Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The money moves sharply to the LDs in North Shropshire – politicalbetting.com

1457910

Comments

  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    Con 4/6
    Ld 6/4
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Labour candidate is personable, and born & bred in the constituency.

    The Tory candidate lives elsewhere.

    The LibDem candidate is a vapid incomer, who made her money elsewhere and went to live in the constituency about 8 years ago.

    I can easily see why someone might want to vote Labour rather than LibDem.

    The result matters not a jot. Boris has a huge majority, and even a loss is not going to presage his resignation in the New Year.
    "vapid incomer"
    "moved to the constituency about 8 years ago"
  • ping said:

    A bit of support for the LDs

    Con 1.55/1.65
    Ld 2.58/2.9

    Stupid to trade this market unless you’ve got very good sources inside the hall, imo

    You're right, I should have stuck with my locked in profit. People inside the hall are going to know far better what's going on. Stupid me, lesson learnt.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,494
    ping said:

    Con 1/2
    Ld 2/1

    If it’s out to 2-1 it’s over surely?
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Are the postal vote totals unembargoed at 10 pm?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    ping said:

    A bit of support for the LDs

    Con 1.55/1.65
    Ld 2.58/2.9

    Stupid to trade this market unless you’ve got very good sources inside the hall, imo

    You’d hope that those sources are moving the market. But it’s too early for that, so far it is just gossip and anecdote
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,248

    Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    Lag cases by about three weeks, but at the moment it's more that the older age groups have very low Covid rates. If that's because of vaccinations, all is relatively well. If it's because the spread has been in schools, and to parents, and will go to the old when the kids kiss granny at Christmas, all bets on death rates are off.
    Admissions are not looking good.

    image
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660

    One thing for certain tonight is that SKS will drop from 2nd place to 3rd and will be nowhere near the 22.1% share of the vote in 2019 (31.7% 2017).

    His record of underperforming "even Corbyn" will yet again be met by silence on here of course.

    When did Corbyn lead on most capable PM
    False forced choice questions are irrelevant.

    Your man is going to take a he'll of a beating tonight again.

    Despite your cultist support his record in actual elections is absolutely dire.
  • Money starting to pile on the Lib Dems? Back in to 2.4
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,368

    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Looks like it could be a better than expected result for Boris.

    Tories scrape home, he avoids a VONC and there is a progressive alliance civil war
    That Labour has decided your leader is such a liability that they are better off leaving him to damage the brand still further, is hardly a vote of confidence.
    Hardly,

    If Boris has become a liability, it is better for the Tories to leave him in place to carry the can for awkward economic decisions in 2022 and 2023.

    A new leader, unsullied by the difficult economic decisions, taking office 6 months to a year before GE 2024 is ideal for the Tories.

    My guess is that could well be Truss.
    I don't often agree with you (Drakeford's travails notwithstanding), but yes, you are bob-on.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    I’ll be buggered if I can find my prediction, posted shortly after I called Old Bexley most accurately.

    If anyone has better PB search skills than me, I’d be most grateful.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552
    LDs fighting back in the Betfair stakes. Almost level again.
  • Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    I am hoping to stretch mine out for quite a while longer....
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited December 2021

    ping said:

    Con 1/2
    Ld 2/1

    If it’s out to 2-1 it’s over surely?
    Not neccecelery

    It remains a distinct possibility that the people pumping money into the market don’t have much better sources than you or I.

    Irrational prices are a feature of political betting, unlike most other sports betting markets.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,631

    Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    Lag cases by about three weeks, but at the moment it's more that the older age groups have very low Covid rates. If that's because of vaccinations, all is relatively well. If it's because the spread has been in schools, and to parents, and will go to the old when the kids kiss granny at Christmas, all bets on death rates are off.
    Admissions are not looking good.

    image
    So far pretty flat on my Manor. Saving it for Christmas 🙄
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    edited December 2021
    As I said during the campaign, an intensive campaign when voters get a lot of contact - canvasses, phone calls, meeting candidates when out shopping etc - and particularly in a seat where voters aren’t used to much party contact - can be cathartic, allowing very unhappy Tories to have a good rant at their party; the risk for LibDems is that by polling day some of them feel they’ve has their protest and already ‘sent their message’.

    Both parties will have been out re-visiting their pledges today, and the campaigns will have got a clear steer from how enthusiastic or otherwise they have been.
  • Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    Lag cases by about three weeks, but at the moment it's more that the older age groups have very low Covid rates. If that's because of vaccinations, all is relatively well. If it's because the spread has been in schools, and to parents, and will go to the old when the kids kiss granny at Christmas, all bets on death rates are off.
    Admissions are not looking good.

    image
    No, although some of this appears to be the data quirk whereby someone who catches Covid while in hospital for other reasons counts as an admission.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,989
    edited December 2021
    New Year Moderna will start testing for Omicron specific version.....BUT....another 2-3 months of trials and even if it goes well, Q2 before any chance of approval.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfXUrJquipk

    Its not going to be until end of Q2 / start of Q3 before they really ramp up production of this.

    Omicron will have gone on its summer holidays by then.
  • Sudden swing
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,984
    Andy_JS said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Labour candidate is personable, and born & bred in the constituency.

    The Tory candidate lives elsewhere.

    The LibDem candidate is a vapid incomer, who made her money elsewhere and went to live in the constituency about 8 years ago.

    I can easily see why someone might want to vote Labour rather than LibDem.

    The result matters not a jot. Boris has a huge majority, and even a loss is not going to presage his resignation in the New Year.
    "vapid incomer"
    "moved to the constituency about 8 years ago"
    Useful predictor I think. Seats where living somewhere for 8 years makes you a “vapid incomer” tend to vote Tory.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660
    What time is the result expected?

    Hopefully relatively early due to a low turnout?

    Should be able to count SKS fans votes in about 10 mins!!
  • Liberals now 1.62
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,826

    Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    Lag cases by about three weeks, but at the moment it's more that the older age groups have very low Covid rates. If that's because of vaccinations, all is relatively well. If it's because the spread has been in schools, and to parents, and will go to the old when the kids kiss granny at Christmas, all bets on death rates are off.
    Admissions are not looking good.

    image
    Those are admissions with covid right? Not necessarily because of?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,188
    Flip flop again, yellow peril back to favouritism. Big lurch for the Lib Dems
  • Liberals now 1.62

    Somebody in the know put some proper money on I guess.
  • Crossover in the market again.

    I've cashed out again, I just keep laying the favourite. Probably should stop doing that, but back in a bigger guaranteed profit at the moment.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,984

    New Year Moderna will start testing for Omicron specific version.....BUT....another 2-3 months of trials and even if it goes well, Q2 before any chance of approval.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfXUrJquipk

    Its not going to be until end of Q2 / start of Q3 before they really ramp up production of this.

    Omicron will have gone on its summer holidays by then.

    By which point we’ll be well past Omicron and on to the next variant.

    Hopefully soon we’ll get a vaccine with efficacy against multiple potential variants.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660

    Liberals now 1.62

    Hopefully we'll justified
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,400
    Woohoo!!
    LD gain from Con in Hexham East.
    Cons lose majority on Northumberland CC.
  • JBriskin3JBriskin3 Posts: 1,254
    No result before 3am according to Jon Craig of Sky.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859

    What time is the result expected?

    Hopefully relatively early due to a low turnout?

    Should be able to count SKS fans votes in about 10 mins!!

    3-5 am
  • BJO is saying Labour were ever in contention to win this seat which is totally absurd, a total strawman.

    He seems unhappy that Labour is currently ahead by between 4 and 9 points, which is weird

  • Meaghan Kall
    @kallmemeg
    ·
    1h
    PSA: England Flag of England has only ~4-5 days left before measuring R or growth rates or doubling time based on case data becomes meaningless as lab capacity gets maxed out.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    Ld 1.79
    Con 2.2
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,984
    'Labour vote non-existent on postals. If carries on libs will smash tories. More tactical vote than expected.'

    -BEP Source at the count-

    https://twitter.com/electpoliticsuk/status/1471616150115082250?s=21
  • I'd laugh so hard if Labour do shock everyone and win. Since I keep trading by laying Tories/LDs, I've got an increasingly big green next to Labour now.
  • dixiedean said:

    Woohoo!!
    LD gain from Con in Hexham East.
    Cons lose majority on Northumberland CC.

    Con lose Hexham. More letters into 22?
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239
    dixiedean said:

    Woohoo!!
    LD gain from Con in Hexham East.

    The LD Hexham campaign was rather fun - lots of shareable graphics of little Lego scenes constructed to make whatever local interest point they were focusing on.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,783
    IanB2 said:

    ping said:

    A bit of support for the LDs

    Con 1.55/1.65
    Ld 2.58/2.9

    Stupid to trade this market unless you’ve got very good sources inside the hall, imo

    You’d hope that those sources are moving the market. But it’s too early for that, so far it is just gossip and anecdote
    Yes. The Libby Wiener(sp) quote that HYUFD put reliance on was probably before any boxes were opened. Although the Tories and LDs will have some feel (and it will just be a feeling unless there is going to be a landslide) for the result the Lab performance at that point in time would have been completely unknown even by Labour.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,400
    Re flip flopping.
    There were reports that the constituency was very patchy earlier. Some villages staying Tory, others switching en masse. Similar with the Labour vote.
    It may, therefore, be a case of which boxes are opened when?
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042
    Pulpstar said:

    Harry Cole
    @MrHarryCole
    · 5h
    JUST IN: Senior Tories think they have lost North Shropshire.

    Hopes of a strongish Labour showing splitting the anti-Tory votes have evaporated, sources say.

    Libby Wiener on ITV news at the count says it looks possible Labour could have deprived the LDs of victory

    Both anecdotes before any boxes opened

    Pip Moss ( @Quincel )

    They don't know! They can't know!

    I stand by this, and think the sudden swings in the market back me up!
  • As a Labour voter I'd have voted Lib Dem today, I am sure most Labour voters will too
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,494
    edited December 2021
    ping said:

    ping said:

    Con 1/2
    Ld 2/1

    If it’s out to 2-1 it’s over surely?
    Not neccecelery

    It remains a distinct possibility that the people pumping money into the market don’t have much better sources than you or I.

    Irrational prices are a feature of political betting, unlike most other sports betting markets.
    But all three parties have declared same thing, Tory win, Turnout and Labour vote higher than expected. Do counts really turn around from that. Bex and Sid didn’t declare for hours past midnight, but everyone new the result by 2315 and the ball parks each party had polled. It must extrapolation. How boxes from areas are breaking you can call accurately with just a little counted.

    I don’t think it would have been a hold held last Friday, but National media coverage since Sunday has been to rally to the flag and give Boris jab boost, partygate just did not come back.
  • HYUFD said:

    What's the best result for Labour....a small Tory win which keeps Boris in place?

    Whoever wins might not matter if these alleged photos of Johnson in a party hat are for real.
    There are likely millions of photos of Boris in a party hat
    But only a party hat?

    Mind bleach etc
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Labour candidate is personable, and born & bred in the constituency.

    The Tory candidate lives elsewhere.

    The LibDem candidate is a vapid incomer, who made her money elsewhere and went to live in the constituency about 8 years ago.

    I can easily see why someone might want to vote Labour rather than LibDem.
    Dude, I can well believe you'd come up with a reason to vote for the Reform Party of the United States of America ahead of the LibDems. Even in North Shropshire.

    @HYUFD will vote LibDem before you do.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Looks like it could be a better than expected result for Boris.

    Tories scrape home, he avoids a VONC and there is a progressive alliance civil war
    That Labour has decided your leader is such a liability that they are better off leaving him to damage the brand still further, is hardly a vote of confidence.
    Hardly,

    If Boris has become a liability, it is better for the Tories to leave him in place to carry the can for awkward economic decisions in 2022 and 2023.

    A new leader, unsullied by the difficult economic decisions, taking office 6 months to a year before GE 2024 is ideal for the Tories.

    My guess is that could well be Truss.
    I don't often agree with you (Drakeford's travails notwithstanding), but yes, you are bob-on.
    And I thought we were besties ... even though you do hobnob with Welsh Tories in the Vale of Glamorgan rather more than I would care to. :)

    Drakeford continues to surprise. Against very strong competition, the closure of the nightclubs on 27th Dec is one of the most nonsensical decisions of the pandemic yet.

    As I am Puritan, of course I believe that the nightclubs should be closed immediately.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,067

    BJO is saying Labour were ever in contention to win this seat which is totally absurd, a total strawman.

    He seems unhappy that Labour is currently ahead by between 4 and 9 points, which is weird

    TBF, so were some Labour leaflets.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,400

    dixiedean said:

    Woohoo!!
    LD gain from Con in Hexham East.
    Cons lose majority on Northumberland CC.

    Con lose Hexham. More letters into 22?
    In fairness. It is the rough end of town. Big Council estate.
    You'd be surprised at the level of deprivation. All in the one of the three wards.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    Farooq said:

    Liberals now 1.62

    Somebody in the know put some proper money on I guess.
    It's not a very liquid market. Someone with plenty of money who either has a finger on the pulse or is comfortable losing a moderate stack. Could very easily be the latter.
    Sudden lurch to Brian Rose on Betfair.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    Ld 1.91
    Con 2.04
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Labour candidate is personable, and born & bred in the constituency.

    The Tory candidate lives elsewhere.

    The LibDem candidate is a vapid incomer, who made her money elsewhere and went to live in the constituency about 8 years ago.

    I can easily see why someone might want to vote Labour rather than LibDem.
    Dude, I can well believe you'd come up with a reason to vote for the Reform Party of the United States of America ahead of the LibDems. Even in North Shropshire.

    @HYUFD will vote LibDem before you do.
    Actually, I voted for a Lib Dem called Mike Smithson in Jericho & Osney in the Oxford City Council election in 2002.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,188
    Is it hard to get into a count - one of us here should try and head to the next by-election and report what's going on without the absolute codswallop most journos seem to come up with when they're trying to mark time.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552
    ping said:

    Ld 1.91
    Con 2.04

    This is turning out to be a real rollercoaster ride. I can't remember a by-election like it.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042

    dixiedean said:

    Woohoo!!
    LD gain from Con in Hexham East.
    Cons lose majority on Northumberland CC.

    Con lose Hexham. More letters into 22?
    Maybe, but can I just say for the record that any MP in any party who tried to depose their leader due to a council by-election should be recalled for the good of the nation.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,067
    Andy_JS said:

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Labour candidate is personable, and born & bred in the constituency.

    The Tory candidate lives elsewhere.

    The LibDem candidate is a vapid incomer, who made her money elsewhere and went to live in the constituency about 8 years ago.

    I can easily see why someone might want to vote Labour rather than LibDem.

    The result matters not a jot. Boris has a huge majority, and even a loss is not going to presage his resignation in the New Year.
    "moved to the constituency about 8 years ago"
    Shameless opportunism !
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552

    I'd laugh so hard if Labour do shock everyone and win. Since I keep trading by laying Tories/LDs, I've got an increasingly big green next to Labour now.

    There is zero chance of Labour winning. Clearly many/most of their supporters have switched to the LDs this time.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298

    BJO is saying Labour were ever in contention to win this seat which is totally absurd, a total strawman.

    He seems unhappy that Labour is currently ahead by between 4 and 9 points, which is weird

    He has half a point.
    Labour might have been in contention if the by-election was called post- party-gate.

    But the accepted wisdom as of the O-Patz defenestration was that the LDs were the only feasible challenger.

    The fact that BJO doesn’t like it, is neither here nor there.
  • Andy_JS said:

    ping said:

    Ld 1.91
    Con 2.04

    This is turning out to be a real rollercoaster ride. I can't remember a by-election like it.
    Market back to an absolute coin toss.

    Nobody has a clue, do they?
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,040
    Green gain in Ashford.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,826
    I walked past Darkeford a few weeks ago in the street. Never seen him before here in his constituency. It was a Sunday afternoon and he was wearing shorts, if I hadn't recognised him I would have mistaken him for a rather doddery pensioner.
  • JBriskin3JBriskin3 Posts: 1,254
    Pulpstar said:

    Is it hard to get into a count - one of us here should try and head to the next by-election and report what's going on without the absolute codswallop most journos seem to come up with when they're trying to mark time.

    PBers might be able to wangle a press pass?
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    Lag cases by about three weeks, but at the moment it's more that the older age groups have very low Covid rates. If that's because of vaccinations, all is relatively well. If it's because the spread has been in schools, and to parents, and will go to the old when the kids kiss granny at Christmas, all bets on death rates are off.
    As one of the 'older' cohort, 67, today I tested positive on two LFT, awaiting PCR result.
    Wait to see how AZ/AZ/Moderna manages severity. Not perfect at protecting against infection!
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Labour candidate is personable, and born & bred in the constituency.

    The Tory candidate lives elsewhere.

    The LibDem candidate is a vapid incomer, who made her money elsewhere and went to live in the constituency about 8 years ago.

    I can easily see why someone might want to vote Labour rather than LibDem.
    Dude, I can well believe you'd come up with a reason to vote for the Reform Party of the United States of America ahead of the LibDems. Even in North Shropshire.

    @HYUFD will vote LibDem before you do.
    Actually, I voted for a Lib Dem called Mike Smithson in Jericho & Osney in the Oxford City Council election in 2002.
    And this Mike Smithson character, he must have crossed you terribly after that.

    Some dark story must explain your LD-phobia.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,494
    edited December 2021
    Quincel said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Harry Cole
    @MrHarryCole
    · 5h
    JUST IN: Senior Tories think they have lost North Shropshire.

    Hopes of a strongish Labour showing splitting the anti-Tory votes have evaporated, sources say.

    Libby Wiener on ITV news at the count says it looks possible Labour could have deprived the LDs of victory

    Both anecdotes before any boxes opened

    Pip Moss ( @Quincel )

    They don't know! They can't know!

    I stand by this, and think the sudden swings in the market back me up!
    Don’t have to open boxes though? Those brilliant exit polls that predict general elections, is before boxes open, though last time they got sample group to repeat on slips what the just done, but you don’t need to go that far for the parties to have feel how it’s gone in certain places they need? Obviously this is my first bet and experience of this, but in bex and sid that same gut feel from the party workers knew the result at 2200 didn’t it?
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,907

    Scott_xP said:

    The LibDems are already suggesting that if #NorthShropshire stays Tory it will be Labour’s fault.

    Labour MPs believe that's an insult to the voters - and proof the LibDems got high on their own hype when Lab have always had a strong chunk of the vote.

    https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1471612116272619520

    Said Labour MPs must be very thick.

    Labour can’t win everywhere. They either figure out how to collaborate with the LDs or they can kiss goodbye to any chance of forming the next government.
    The Tories didn't win an eighty seat majority by thinking "Tories can't win in seats like Leigh, lets collaborate with the LDs to ensure they take them off Labour".

    Labour were second-placed and won over 17,000 votes in this constituency only a few years ago. 17,000 votes would be enough to win most by-elections if they could have got that vote out to give the government a kicking.
    1. This is a by-election not a GE
    2. The psephology for Labour at the next election is quite different from that facing Boris in 2019
    3. As often pointed out; LD ceiling is/was higher than Labour’s in this seat.
    What does 3. mean Lab we're at nearly 32% less than 5 years ago and the LDs close to lost deposit territory
    Lets hope the Labour tactical voters are brighter than you. Sorry your man's Boris i forgot.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660

    As a Labour voter I'd have voted Lib Dem today, I am sure most Labour voters will too

    Why. Lab started 9000 votes ahead of LDs.

    How has it come to this?

    BTW as an ABS voter I would have voted LD too.
  • Andy_JS said:

    ping said:

    Ld 1.91
    Con 2.04

    This is turning out to be a real rollercoaster ride. I can't remember a by-election like it.
    Market back to an absolute coin toss.

    Nobody has a clue, do they?
    Nope.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552
    "Theo Usherwood
    @theousherwood

    Tory view from the North Shropshire count is that from looking at the contents of the ballot boxes that have arrived first, it looks like the protest votes have coalesced around the Lib Dems.

    Conservative source: “We’re in trouble.”

    11:19 PM · Dec 16, 2021"

    https://twitter.com/theousherwood/status/1471620962001076226
  • Andy_JS said:

    "Theo Usherwood
    @theousherwood

    Tory view from the North Shropshire count is that from looking at the contents of the ballot boxes that have arrived first, it looks like the protest votes have coalesced around the Lib Dems.

    Conservative source: “We’re in trouble.”

    11:19 PM · Dec 16, 2021"

    https://twitter.com/theousherwood/status/1471620962001076226

    Bye bye Boris.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552
    Pulpstar said:

    Is it hard to get into a count - one of us here should try and head to the next by-election and report what's going on without the absolute codswallop most journos seem to come up with when they're trying to mark time.

    I was there earlier today but not sure how you get into the count.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,984
    Tories getting walloped in council by-elections so far this evening.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,188
    People on twitter seem to be airbrushing the 1904 Oswestry by-election from history.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,494

    dixiedean said:

    Woohoo!!
    LD gain from Con in Hexham East.

    The LD Hexham campaign was rather fun - lots of shareable graphics of little Lego scenes constructed to make whatever local interest point they were focusing on.
    Brilliant! Infrastructure minister in the next Lib lab coalition. 😀
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    Andy_JS said:

    "Theo Usherwood
    @theousherwood

    Tory view from the North Shropshire count is that from looking at the contents of the ballot boxes that have arrived first, it looks like the protest votes have coalesced around the Lib Dems.

    Conservative source: “We’re in trouble.”

    11:19 PM · Dec 16, 2021"

    https://twitter.com/theousherwood/status/1471620962001076226

    You love to see it.

    I’m trying to go to bed. I just want a clear steer one way or t’other.
  • Gary_BurtonGary_Burton Posts: 737
    edited December 2021
    Andy_JS said:

    I'd laugh so hard if Labour do shock everyone and win. Since I keep trading by laying Tories/LDs, I've got an increasingly big green next to Labour now.

    There is zero chance of Labour winning. Clearly many/most of their supporters have switched to the LDs this time.
    I hope Lib Dems narrowly pull it off and it would be good if there's a by election in e.g. Shrewsbury in the near future where tactical voting could be reciprocated in favour of Labour.

    I think the Lib Dems were always going to struggle to push Labour below 10% whether Labour campaigned or not.
  • Pulpstar said:

    People on twitter seem to be airbrushing the 1904 Oswestry by-election from history.

    People on twitter mis-reporting history, never....
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 50,248
    edited December 2021

    Pulpstar said:

    Another day goes by and we're still talking about omicron cases but not deaths.

    Death takes a while.
    Lag cases by about three weeks, but at the moment it's more that the older age groups have very low Covid rates. If that's because of vaccinations, all is relatively well. If it's because the spread has been in schools, and to parents, and will go to the old when the kids kiss granny at Christmas, all bets on death rates are off.
    Admissions are not looking good.

    image
    Those are admissions with covid right? Not necessarily because of?
    Groan. Not that shit again.....

    EDIT: I will release the mutated flying lawyers with baseball bats if this goes much further....
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552
    Tories having a bad night so far in the local council by-elections.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042

    Quincel said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Harry Cole
    @MrHarryCole
    · 5h
    JUST IN: Senior Tories think they have lost North Shropshire.

    Hopes of a strongish Labour showing splitting the anti-Tory votes have evaporated, sources say.

    Libby Wiener on ITV news at the count says it looks possible Labour could have deprived the LDs of victory

    Both anecdotes before any boxes opened

    Pip Moss ( @Quincel )

    They don't know! They can't know!

    I stand by this, and think the sudden swings in the market back me up!
    Don’t have to open boxes though? Those brilliant exit polls that predict general elections, is before boxes open, though last time they got sample group to repeat on slips what the just done, but you don’t need to go that far for the parties to have feel how it’s gone in certain places they need? Obviously this is my first bet and experience of this, but in bex and sid that same gut feel from the party workers knew the result at 2200 didn’t it?
    You can't do a one-off exit poll, the method works by running it in (mostly) the same places each election and comparing the shift in vote to extrapolate the outcome. So for by-elections you didn't have the data from last time (since the national exit poll doesn't use enough polling stations to give good data for any individual seat).

    In theory party activists could get a sense from the campaign, but my view is that they are generally too emotionally involved and just not good enough at judging the situation from their anecdotal experience.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660

    BJO is saying Labour were ever in contention to win this seat which is totally absurd, a total strawman.

    He seems unhappy that Labour is currently ahead by between 4 and 9 points, which is weird

    Did you not see SKS's leaflets saying it was between Tories and Labour.

    Although obviously he is a lying ****
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,400
    Tories getting a caning in the Councils tonight. If that is any guide.
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,040
    LD gain in West Lindsey. It seems that the anti-Tory vote is making the right choices.
  • As a Labour voter I'd have voted Lib Dem today, I am sure most Labour voters will too

    Why. Lab started 9000 votes ahead of LDs.

    How has it come to this?

    BTW as an ABS voter I would have voted LD too.
    I think if you were after getting tory flippers, it is easier for them to go LD than Lab? And easier then to squeeze the labour votes?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,552
    slade said:

    Green gain in Ashford.

    The Greens keep doing well in Kent local elections.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,400
    Pulpstar said:

    People on twitter seem to be airbrushing the 1904 Oswestry by-election from history.

    How very dare they!!?
  • Tories are going to lose a lot of seats in 2024 to the Lib Dems.

    Lib Dems back up to 20+ seats I reckon, going to see if I can get any odds on Guildford and Winchester being Lib Dem gains.

    Labour/LD C&S has got to be a decent prediction
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,011
    Andy_JS said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Is it hard to get into a count - one of us here should try and head to the next by-election and report what's going on without the absolute codswallop most journos seem to come up with when they're trying to mark time.

    I was there earlier today but not sure how you get into the count.
    Stand as a candidate?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660
    Green Gain from Tory in Asford

    SKS loses another deposit in 4th
  • dixiedean said:

    Tories getting a caning in the Councils tonight. If that is any guide.

    Time for another party Johnson. In your own house.
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042

    Tories are going to lose a lot of seats in 2024 to the Lib Dems.

    Lib Dems back up to 20+ seats I reckon, going to see if I can get any odds on Guildford and Winchester being Lib Dem gains.

    Labour/LD C&S has got to be a decent prediction

    Funny you mention this, there might be an article coming in the next 48 hours about such a bet...
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298

    Pulpstar said:

    People on twitter seem to be airbrushing the 1904 Oswestry by-election from history.

    People on twitter mis-reporting history, never....
    Brilliant!

    Actually, looking at old results, the Libs and it’s successor party have always had a decent following in this part of the world.

    LDs came second as recently as 2010.
  • The Labour/Lib Dem vote seems to be very efficient, if recent results are anything to go by
  • Andy_JS said:

    "Theo Usherwood
    @theousherwood

    Tory view from the North Shropshire count is that from looking at the contents of the ballot boxes that have arrived first, it looks like the protest votes have coalesced around the Lib Dems.

    Conservative source: “We’re in trouble.”

    11:19 PM · Dec 16, 2021"

    https://twitter.com/theousherwood/status/1471620962001076226

    Bye bye Boris.
    Liberals back down to 1.96
  • Did someone say 'rollercoaster'?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,660
    Lab cling on in Telford 9.4% swing Lab to Con compared to "even Corbyn"
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,040
    A Con win in Lichfield. They hold on to a seat there.
  • Did someone say 'rollercoaster'?

    They obviously never gambled on crypto....
  • QuincelQuincel Posts: 4,042

    Green Gain from Tory in Asford

    SKS loses another deposit in 4th

    I'm being pedantic here, but there aren't deposits in local elections are there?
This discussion has been closed.