Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

YouGov polls: From Hartlepool to North Shropshire – politicalbetting.com

1456810

Comments

  • TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    Stocky said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    Alternatively, he is willing to accept the risks that are part of life and is taking responsibility for his own health.
    And sheer irresponsibility for those who may die because he wants to "crack on".
    But hang on, I'm 60 and I want to crack on, as do all the people in their 80s who I know well enough to know what they think about it. They and I would much rather life went on, at considerable enhanced personal risk, than more lockdown.
    I agree with you, I have had two Christmas socials already with four more coming up before Christmas and intend to attend all of them. I'm 56, many of my friends are older. We have reduced the risk to an acceptable level, let's get on with it.
    The biggest risk is getting pinged.

    Think about that - there is a risk that because someone you were near had an infection you would be confined to your home for 10 days.
    Well, I just have been, it was tedious, but not the worst thing in the world. I would cancel my Christmas leave and work from home to give me something to do.
    Hoping that your employer would roll over enough days to 2022.
    Being a Civil Servant I'm allowed to carry over 10, and my leave year ends May anyway.
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    tlg86 said:

    Endillion said:

    Scott_xP said:

    This is outrageous. Vaccine passports are not expected to apply to MPs in the House of Commons. Them & us personified. They are taking the piss out of us. Repeatedly. https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status/1470780968302788620/photo/1

    That's not "them and us", that's to avoid the possibility of the public electing someone to represent them in Parliament, whom Parliament then bans from showing up because of a personal choice. If anything, it's MPs accepting greater risk on themselves for the sake of democracy.
    But then it should make them stop and think about the whole thing. What if an anti-vaxxer MP spreads COVID to my MP and kills them? How is that good for democracy?
    It's rubbish for democracy, but the logical conclusion is to make vaccinations compulsory, not impose vaxports.
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,813
    maaarsh said:

    TOPPING said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    Stocky said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    Alternatively, he is willing to accept the risks that are part of life and is taking responsibility for his own health.
    And sheer irresponsibility for those who may die because he wants to "crack on".
    But hang on, I'm 60 and I want to crack on, as do all the people in their 80s who I know well enough to know what they think about it. They and I would much rather life went on, at considerable enhanced personal risk, than more lockdown.
    I agree with you, I have had two Christmas socials already with four more coming up before Christmas and intend to attend all of them. I'm 56, many of my friends are older. We have reduced the risk to an acceptable level, let's get on with it.
    The biggest risk is getting pinged.

    Think about that - there is a risk that because someone you were near had an infection you would be confined to your home for 10 days.
    Does anyone still use track and trace?

    No, the biggest risk is that you and yours actually contract the thing. That is what is causing labour shortages in everything from Scotrail to DHL to the Premier League already.
    A lot of people seem to be saying they've tested positive but without symptoms which makes me wonder, if you didn't have to, why they took the test?

    If you're positive and asymptomatic and never take a test, then are you a "case"?
    Nasty case of paid leave.
    That, and a lot of people just do regular LFTs out of habit for various reasons (e.g. that the Government has recommended it, that their employer likes them to, or that they have interactions with vulnerable people.)
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 4,874
    Leon said:

    Sitting outside a charming cafe in A BALEARIC ISLAND in mild winter sun drinking an excellent Ribuero del Duero which is 3 euro a go.

    Drink myself to death Y/N?

    At 3 euros, it won’t matter if you can’t taste or smell it.
  • Labour MPs arguing to back lockdown but against NHS workers being expected to be vaccinated because unions aren't OK with it.

    So hospitality businesses etc can be destroyed to protect the NHS but NHS staff can't be expected to get the vaccine?

    Labour are nowhere close to fit for office.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,890
    I note Aaron hasn't raised his head above the parapet so I presume he's voting with the Gov't.
  • Endillion said:

    Daily Boosters: 513,722
    Current Leader: @Endillion
    All entries still in the competition (i.e. could still win)

    Stop the count!

    Edit: for the avoidance of doubt, mine was mostly a joke entry, and I hope very much it doesn't win.
    Your strategy of coming up with a number that had already been exceeded may be genius.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    England and Scotland potential third dose vaccinations (13th December)

    image
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,080

    TOPPING said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    Stocky said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    Alternatively, he is willing to accept the risks that are part of life and is taking responsibility for his own health.
    And sheer irresponsibility for those who may die because he wants to "crack on".
    But hang on, I'm 60 and I want to crack on, as do all the people in their 80s who I know well enough to know what they think about it. They and I would much rather life went on, at considerable enhanced personal risk, than more lockdown.
    I agree with you, I have had two Christmas socials already with four more coming up before Christmas and intend to attend all of them. I'm 56, many of my friends are older. We have reduced the risk to an acceptable level, let's get on with it.
    The biggest risk is getting pinged.

    Think about that - there is a risk that because someone you were near had an infection you would be confined to your home for 10 days.
    Does anyone still use track and trace?

    No, the biggest risk is that you and yours actually contract the thing. That is what is causing labour shortages in everything from Scotrail to DHL to the Premier League already.
    A lot of people seem to be saying they've tested positive but without symptoms which makes me wonder, if you didn't have to, why they took the test?

    If you're positive and asymptomatic and never take a test, then are you a "case"?
    We will take LFTs before we leave on Thursday to visit Bath. If we were asymptomatic, but infectious, then it's reasonable (if annoying) to stay home and avoid infecting others. This is a basic public health measure to slow down the spread and lessen the size of the peak.

    It's a bit more of an intervention than simply asking people to stay home if symptomatic, but not an assault on liberty. I'd hope that LFTs for asymptomatic testing would be dropped after this winter.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    UK cases by specimen date

    image
  • Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    UK cases by specimen date and scaled to 100K

    image
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    UK Local R

    image
  • glwglw Posts: 9,871

    Labour MPs arguing to back lockdown but against NHS workers being expected to be vaccinated because unions aren't OK with it.

    So hospitality businesses etc can be destroyed to protect the NHS but NHS staff can't be expected to get the vaccine?

    Labour are nowhere close to fit for office.

    We should sack them all. Given them 48 hours to book a vaccine or they get the boot.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639
    Farooq said:

    Carnyx said:

    Endillion said:

    Endillion said:

    "The country will face an “exit wave” of coronavirus infections whenever restrictions are lifted, England’s chief medical officer has said."

    DEMONSTRABLY AN ABUSE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE

    If we had seen cases rise and fall then fine. But we didn't. Cases rose. And with some variations at the top stayed largely the same. We didn't see the dropping away as we exit that wave. Its just stayed high permanently.
    We did see them fall.

    Because in the first phase schools were closed, in the second the schools were reopened.

    Unless you have come to some perverted belief that schools don't affect transmission? Is that your claim now?
    Lol

    Covid cases 17th May 2,220 (7 day average). Then after we made changes a big spike and the pogoing highs and lows around the new baseline.

    Peak 47,114 (21/07), trough 25,722 (02/08), peak 38,459 (09/09), trough 28.928 (17/09), peak 47,209 (23/10), trough 33,477 (10/11), peak 51,176 (13/12).

    When you say "we did see them fall" it was to 25,722, a mere 11.5x higher than the start. And then up and up and up.
    You are being so insane now, May was during restrictions, why the hell would it have to fall beneath the figure that is only achievable with restrictions? What an absurd suggestion (!)

    Are you so naive and so unwilling to be realistic now that you can't tell the difference between transmission with schools closed and transmission with schools open now?

    16 July 47,970.4
    13 September 28,540.4

    So the 7 day average halved until the schools went back, that's one wave.

    You seem to be in utter denial. First you want us to exit the virus, then you want cases to fall below what they were when we were in lockdown. You just clearly haven't grasped the severity of reality have you?

    You're getting irate at others because you're in complete denial.
    More belly laughs at my end - this is great! Had it dropped to 28k and kept falling then that would have been great! Instead that was the new floor and then we saw an ever-increasing level of new floors. 28k. 33k, now 51k.

    You said "We did see them fall. Because in the first phase schools were closed, in the second the schools were reopened." Yes. And then they went up again. And up some more. And some more.

    We replaced the 2k cases a day with mask restrictions with a very best 28k a day and then up and up. If an ever-increasing number of cases is us exiting having cases then black truly is white.

    Do keep it up, you're as funny as HYUFD foaming on about Toryism.
    Why would it keep falling? Schools reopened! Then it became winter.

    You are utterly delusional. Had we not had the exit wave we would have seen exponential growth with schools open, no restrictions and winter. To keep levels flat, while circumstances are getting worse, is proof that the wave has happened.
    I'm not an expert on waves, but I don't think they're supposed to peak, and then just keep going at the level of the peak indefinitely.
    One reason waves in the water form the pattern they do is the ground level is rising which causes the water to rise too.

    In the UK since lifting lockdown the ground level for Covid's spread has been rising: Schools reopened, summer ended, winter began. And yet despite the ground level rising, the cases have been flat. Why?

    The only reason the cases have been flat despite the higher ground level, is that the prior wave had just happened.

    Imagine if it was the other way around, starting in winter with schools open, then going into spring, then summer, then the schools closed over summer holidays - if cases were flat over that, then you'd be confused why.

    To have cases flat, while the ground level to boost Covid is getting higher, is proof that the wave had happened, not proof it didn't.
    It's proof that the wave isn't over yet, which is proof that the (presumed) prior belief that it would crest and then break was wrong. In short, it is now conclusively proven to be Not a Wave.

    Look at it another way: six months ago, was anyone predicting an "exit wave" that got stuck around 50k cases reported per day for months on end, if restrictions lifted?
    Waves is funny things. One never knows, the dynamics muight have generatyed a soliton which moves forward as quickly as we do in time: see this ship in a canal 2:30 ON.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D14QuUL8x60
    I think I understood this. Waves travel through time, meaning that a wave can happen before the event that caused it.
    I think I could squeeze a paper out of this and it'll make a big splash.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SknvLa8qEu0

    Especially when you get to the end of time.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,123

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    edited December 2021
    Case summary

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Hospitals

    image
    image
    image
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Deaths

    image
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639
    IanB2 said:

    Farooq said:

    maaarsh said:

    Scott_xP said:

    15-minute wait after Pfizer jab suspended by CMOs.

    This will allow 500,000 more boosters

    So far 17 people have had anaphylactic reactions during the observation period. None fatal

    Pretty understandable trade-off


    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/suspension-of-the-15-minute-wait-for-vaccination-with-mrna-vaccine-for-covid-19-uk-cmos-opinion/suspension-of-the-15-minute-wait-for-vaccination-with-mrna-vaccine-for-covid-19-uk-cmos-opinion

    Every single person at the centre I was at this morning left within 15 seconds of jabbing, and that is not even an exaggeration.
    15 minute wait was closely monitored and perfectly observed from my booster today, from what I had a chance to observe. Rows of seats corresponding to time of jab, a worker walking up and down checking everybody felt fine.
    Nah. I just walked out; I had the dog in the car and I am sure he would have gone and summoned help Lassie-style in the almost infintessimal chance that it might have been necessary.
    Didn't bother in my case when I got the booster - we were getting a taxi home and I had had enough of the crowded venue. (Or seemingly crowded: nothing to compare with the pics today, thouigh (at least here) it was very fully booked and people being processed without gaps, a month back).
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,639

    Carnyx said:

    dixiedean said:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/14/motorist-jailed-for-running-over-cyclist-who-spat-on-his-car

    18 months. What do we think? I'm not sure why the driver wasn't prosecuted for attempted murder.

    Violent criminal who is "one of us."
    Not "one of them."
    Aside from the sentence.
    3 year ban? For a man prepared to use his vehicle as a weapon?
    If it had been a gun, would he ever be allowed one again? I think not.
    A 74 year old engineer is "one of us?"

    I think this is another case of "With cars, it is completely different" - it's as if there is a special sentencing section for "done with a car"
    Quite.

    You would have thought that the concept of a car as a weapon had been demonstrated well enough recently.

    Why is it OK to terrorise cyclists but not pedestrians?
    Only fair, seeingf as how cyclists terrorise us pedestrians. (Not serious in that sense: but still there is an issue.)
    You might want to ask why cyclists are terrorising pedestrians (if they are, I don't) when it is always quicker to ride on the road...
    Where I live, they find it quicker to ride on the pavement and n pedestrianised areas!
  • glwglw Posts: 9,871
    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Age related case data

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Age related admissions data

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,573
    Pulpstar said:

    I note Aaron hasn't raised his head above the parapet so I presume he's voting with the Gov't.

    He gave a bit of a toady intervention to Javid, so you presume correctly.
  • glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    Good for them.

    Vaccines have been rolled out, why shouldn't they have freedom? 👍
  • maaarsh said:

    Cases up quite a bit. Testing still rising faster. Number of people in English hospital beds up by just 39, so now a full 10k less than same day last year. Deaths down.

    Positivity rate 4.6% - still within WHO guidelines, unlike some of our European peers (some of whom also appear to have significant data lags):


  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895
    Me: “What are the chances of a lockdown after Christmas?”

    Senior Tory MP: “8 out of 10”

    😔

    https://twitter.com/MhariAurora/status/1470785055656132624
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,477
    This town pub quite busy! Lots of people sitting outside though, as am I. Lovely mild night for December.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    UK COVID Summary

    Cases - rising. London is really accelerating now. Reaching into the older groups
    Admissions - rising. London is really not looking good
    Deaths - surprisingly flat so far. That will change.

    image
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,921
    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736
    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
  • glwglw Posts: 9,871

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    Good for them.

    Vaccines have been rolled out, why shouldn't they have freedom? 👍
    They aren't doing it because they've done a good job with vaccinating and the coronavirus in under control, they are doing it to oppose the Biden administration.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895
    Former chief whip @Mark_J_Harper criticises the PM's Sunday night Omicrom broadcast: accuses him of "scaring people witless".
    Urges ministers to promise they will give MPs a say before imposing any tougher measures.

    https://twitter.com/GuardianHeather/status/1470794331296514054
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,890
    What's the daily CONFIRMED Omicron number (No not Javid's) ?

    Can't find it anywhere.
  • StockyStocky Posts: 10,113

    UK COVID Summary

    Cases - rising. London is really accelerating now. Reaching into the older groups
    Admissions - rising. London is really not looking good
    Deaths - surprisingly flat so far. That will change.

    image

    Hospitalisation rising but only 4% higher than same day last week (7672 vs 7373).
  • maaarsh said:

    Cases up quite a bit. Testing still rising faster. Number of people in English hospital beds up by just 39, so now a full 10k less than same day last year. Deaths down.

    Positivity rate 4.6% - still within WHO guidelines, unlike some of our European peers (some of whom also appear to have significant data lags):


    Nearly 30% in the Netherlands? 😖

    This winter is going to be awful and entirely avoidably awful for many of our neighbouring nations because they were so badly mismanaged they failed to get a steady state of having an exit wave over the summer.

    No immunity and now Omicron. It was entirely preventable the imbeciles just needed to lift restrictions and let it rip over the summer. Instead now it's going to rip over the winter for more atrocious consequences.

    What a tragedy. It's absolutely awful.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    dixiedean said:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/14/motorist-jailed-for-running-over-cyclist-who-spat-on-his-car

    18 months. What do we think? I'm not sure why the driver wasn't prosecuted for attempted murder.

    Violent criminal who is "one of us."
    Not "one of them."
    Aside from the sentence.
    3 year ban? For a man prepared to use his vehicle as a weapon?
    If it had been a gun, would he ever be allowed one again? I think not.
    A 74 year old engineer is "one of us?"

    I think this is another case of "With cars, it is completely different" - it's as if there is a special sentencing section for "done with a car"
    Quite.

    You would have thought that the concept of a car as a weapon had been demonstrated well enough recently.

    Why is it OK to terrorise cyclists but not pedestrians?
    Only fair, seeingf as how cyclists terrorise us pedestrians. (Not serious in that sense: but still there is an issue.)
    You might want to ask why cyclists are terrorising pedestrians (if they are, I don't) when it is always quicker to ride on the road...
    Where I live, they find it quicker to ride on the pavement and n pedestrianised areas!
    Safer, generally.

    A comic note - on one of the approach roads to Richmond park, the cycle path is a bit of a wide pavement, marked off.

    Since Richmond park is a very popular venue for cycling, you might think this gets used a lot. It doesn't.

    The pavement is moderately irregular - to the point of making it unpleasant to ride on with a mountain bike with front fork suspension.

    Nearly all of the cyclists heading to and from Richmond park are on racing bikes - part of the attraction of Richmond Park is the good road surfaces.
  • tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    That's probably because both cases and deaths fell to a fraction of their level in early January within a few months of him leaving office. They have picked up and are currently running at about half that peak level. Once omicron takes hold I am guessing we will see new peaks, but those affected will mostly be freedom loving Trumpster anti vaxers so they won't be complaining and I'm guessing nobody else will either.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    Bit weak, mate.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,123
    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    I see New York has it bad again...

    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/new-york/
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,314
    Having studied all the experts on this thread, and other sources, I'm pleased to say I think I've come up with a definitive answer to the question of the impact of Omicron in the UK.

    Question: Will Omicron lead to unbearable pressure on the NHS and an unacceptable level of deaths?

    Answer: I don't know, and nor does anybody else. Get back to me in 4-6 weeks for an updated definitive answer.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,753
    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    How do you know it was a bloke.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947

    TOPPING said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    Stocky said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    Alternatively, he is willing to accept the risks that are part of life and is taking responsibility for his own health.
    And sheer irresponsibility for those who may die because he wants to "crack on".
    But hang on, I'm 60 and I want to crack on, as do all the people in their 80s who I know well enough to know what they think about it. They and I would much rather life went on, at considerable enhanced personal risk, than more lockdown.
    I agree with you, I have had two Christmas socials already with four more coming up before Christmas and intend to attend all of them. I'm 56, many of my friends are older. We have reduced the risk to an acceptable level, let's get on with it.
    The biggest risk is getting pinged.

    Think about that - there is a risk that because someone you were near had an infection you would be confined to your home for 10 days.
    Does anyone still use track and trace?

    No, the biggest risk is that you and yours actually contract the thing. That is what is causing labour shortages in everything from Scotrail to DHL to the Premier League already.
    A lot of people seem to be saying they've tested positive but without symptoms which makes me wonder, if you didn't have to, why they took the test?

    If you're positive and asymptomatic and never take a test, then are you a "case"?
    We will take LFTs before we leave on Thursday to visit Bath. If we were asymptomatic, but infectious, then it's reasonable (if annoying) to stay home and avoid infecting others. This is a basic public health measure to slow down the spread and lessen the size of the peak.

    It's a bit more of an intervention than simply asking people to stay home if symptomatic, but not an assault on liberty. I'd hope that LFTs for asymptomatic testing would be dropped after this winter.
    That's exactly right. I did an LTR - my 1st and only - in prep for a big family get together 2 weeks ago. Everyone did one and posted a pic of their clear result on the WhatsApp. It was a little bit of a 'papers please' approach to the event. No papers, no access to Uncle Albert. I imagine similar is happening all over the country.
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,573
    South African deaths down on last week, still resolutely at background radiation levles.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528
    tlg86 said:

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    I see New York has it bad again...

    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/new-york/
    Impossible, they all wear masks! I've been told repeatedly that this is impossible.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,753

    Having studied all the experts on this thread, and other sources, I'm pleased to say I think I've come up with a definitive answer to the question of the impact of Omicron in the UK.

    Question: Will Omicron lead to unbearable pressure on the NHS and an unacceptable level of deaths?

    Answer: I don't know, and nor does anybody else. Get back to me in 4-6 weeks for an updated definitive answer.

    Oh so now you're a grandfather you've come over all wise and knowledgeable, eh?

    :smile:
  • tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    Omi is in 34 states says NY Times.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Stocky said:

    UK COVID Summary

    Cases - rising. London is really accelerating now. Reaching into the older groups
    Admissions - rising. London is really not looking good
    Deaths - surprisingly flat so far. That will change.

    image

    Hospitalisation rising but only 4% higher than same day last week (7672 vs 7373).
    Look at the regional graphs - that's why I posted them. An iron law of the epidemic is that what starts happening in a couple of regions, will be coming to your area. Real soon now....
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,813

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    Good for them.

    Vaccines have been rolled out, why shouldn't they have freedom? 👍
    Vaccines have indeed been rolled out, but the state of the vaccination programme varies wildly between the states.

    According to the helpful resource provided by ourworldindata.org, as of yesterday the UK had delivered 178 doses per 100 people, versus 146 in the US. However, looking at the states individually, only one (Vermont, 190 doses/100 people) is ahead of us, whereas at the other end of the scale Idaho has only managed 110.

    In short, if Britain, which has managed to get at least one dose into almost 90% of everyone over the age of 12, is meant to be in considerable peril from Omicron, the Americans may well be stuffed as TSE suggests.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,753
    tlg86 said:

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    I see New York has it bad again...

    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/new-york/
    They didn't seem to care at MSG for Loma vs Commey. Not a mask in sight.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,114
    rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    Friday night in the city. Relais de Venise had a queue out of the door. The Counting House was rammo until later than usual.

    Was in Balham on Sunday. Pub quiz as busy and rowdy as ever.

    I went to Soho last night.

    The waiting time for Zedels was 90 minutes.

    On a Monday.

    My main impression so far:

    Many people are happy to revert to WFH in the run up to Xmas. But they're still boozing and enjoying themselves. And us youngsters want to crack on.

    I'd be surprised if restos wanted added work of vaccine passports. They all seem understaffed at the moment as it is.

  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,314
    TOPPING said:

    Having studied all the experts on this thread, and other sources, I'm pleased to say I think I've come up with a definitive answer to the question of the impact of Omicron in the UK.

    Question: Will Omicron lead to unbearable pressure on the NHS and an unacceptable level of deaths?

    Answer: I don't know, and nor does anybody else. Get back to me in 4-6 weeks for an updated definitive answer.

    Oh so now you're a grandfather you've come over all wise and knowledgeable, eh?

    :smile:
    Very good. I was wise and knowledgeable before, but grandfather-hood has led to an exponential growth in my wisdom and knowledgeability. Sadly, it's not contagious.
  • Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077

    Stocky said:

    UK COVID Summary

    Cases - rising. London is really accelerating now. Reaching into the older groups
    Admissions - rising. London is really not looking good
    Deaths - surprisingly flat so far. That will change.

    image

    Hospitalisation rising but only 4% higher than same day last week (7672 vs 7373).
    Look at the regional graphs - that's why I posted them. An iron law of the epidemic is that what starts happening in a couple of regions, will be coming to your area. Real soon now....
    Those London admission figures look bad - but it's also worth remembering that London has lower vaccinations levels than elsewhere.
  • jonny83jonny83 Posts: 1,270
    Cases rising, hospitalisations will follow and then sadly deaths. We are in for a hard winter, just a question of how tough is it going to get?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    Bit weak, mate.
    On the subject of personal responsibility. Consider the following thought experiment...

    Take a legally owned, empty shotgun into the garden, point it at the neighbours and go click.

    The real world number on accidents with guns suggest that the chance of something awful happening is in the 1 in a million line.

    Do that and you are looking at societal condemnation and prison.

    Go down the pub, when feeling rough and give your neighbour COVID.....
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,895
    Conservatives now 10/11 (from 6/4 this morning) to win in North Shropshire. Could be an interesting couple of days ahead.

    https://sports.ladbrokes.com/event/politics/uk/uk-politics/north-shropshire-by-election/234187518/all-markets https://twitter.com/LadPolitics/status/1470796578973696012/photo/1
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
  • pigeon said:

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    Good for them.

    Vaccines have been rolled out, why shouldn't they have freedom? 👍
    Vaccines have indeed been rolled out, but the state of the vaccination programme varies wildly between the states.

    According to the helpful resource provided by ourworldindata.org, as of yesterday the UK had delivered 178 doses per 100 people, versus 146 in the US. However, looking at the states individually, only one (Vermont, 190 doses/100 people) is ahead of us, whereas at the other end of the scale Idaho has only managed 110.

    In short, if Britain, which has managed to get at least one dose into almost 90% of everyone over the age of 12, is meant to be in considerable peril from Omicron, the Americans may well be stuffed as TSE suggests.
    Let it rip.

    If the unvaccinated in America die heavily then that could save help American democracy. Every cloud and all that . . .
  • MaffewMaffew Posts: 235

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    dixiedean said:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/14/motorist-jailed-for-running-over-cyclist-who-spat-on-his-car

    18 months. What do we think? I'm not sure why the driver wasn't prosecuted for attempted murder.

    Violent criminal who is "one of us."
    Not "one of them."
    Aside from the sentence.
    3 year ban? For a man prepared to use his vehicle as a weapon?
    If it had been a gun, would he ever be allowed one again? I think not.
    A 74 year old engineer is "one of us?"

    I think this is another case of "With cars, it is completely different" - it's as if there is a special sentencing section for "done with a car"
    Quite.

    You would have thought that the concept of a car as a weapon had been demonstrated well enough recently.

    Why is it OK to terrorise cyclists but not pedestrians?
    Only fair, seeingf as how cyclists terrorise us pedestrians. (Not serious in that sense: but still there is an issue.)
    You might want to ask why cyclists are terrorising pedestrians (if they are, I don't) when it is always quicker to ride on the road...
    Where I live, they find it quicker to ride on the pavement and n pedestrianised areas!
    Safer, generally.

    A comic note - on one of the approach roads to Richmond park, the cycle path is a bit of a wide pavement, marked off.

    Since Richmond park is a very popular venue for cycling, you might think this gets used a lot. It doesn't.

    The pavement is moderately irregular - to the point of making it unpleasant to ride on with a mountain bike with front fork suspension.

    Nearly all of the cyclists heading to and from Richmond park are on racing bikes - part of the attraction of Richmond Park is the good road surfaces.
    It's also narrow and you have to give way at side roads.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,921

    TOPPING said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    Stocky said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    Alternatively, he is willing to accept the risks that are part of life and is taking responsibility for his own health.
    And sheer irresponsibility for those who may die because he wants to "crack on".
    But hang on, I'm 60 and I want to crack on, as do all the people in their 80s who I know well enough to know what they think about it. They and I would much rather life went on, at considerable enhanced personal risk, than more lockdown.
    I agree with you, I have had two Christmas socials already with four more coming up before Christmas and intend to attend all of them. I'm 56, many of my friends are older. We have reduced the risk to an acceptable level, let's get on with it.
    The biggest risk is getting pinged.

    Think about that - there is a risk that because someone you were near had an infection you would be confined to your home for 10 days.
    Does anyone still use track and trace?

    No, the biggest risk is that you and yours actually contract the thing. That is what is causing labour shortages in everything from Scotrail to DHL to the Premier League already.
    A lot of people seem to be saying they've tested positive but without symptoms which makes me wonder, if you didn't have to, why they took the test?

    If you're positive and asymptomatic and never take a test, then are you a "case"?
    If it's a home LFT, then no. Most people who test positively at home just stay home.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,477
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    Friday night in the city. Relais de Venise had a queue out of the door. The Counting House was rammo until later than usual.

    Was in Balham on Sunday. Pub quiz as busy and rowdy as ever.

    I went to Soho last night.

    The waiting time for Zedels was 90 minutes.

    On a Monday.

    My main impression so far:

    Many people are happy to revert to WFH in the run up to Xmas. But they're still boozing and enjoying themselves. And us youngsters want to crack on.

    I'd be surprised if restos wanted added work of vaccine passports. They all seem understaffed at the moment as it is.

    Who exactly is going to enforce these vaxports? I suppose you could make them a sale condition of buying a round, which is not quite the same thing.
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,573
    edited December 2021

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    You think the government is trying to play this down? They'r desperate to amp up fear - if reinfection starts to drive a material number, they will be added in pdq.
  • Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Wow you've really drunk the kool aid now. 🤦‍♂️

    You're making Chris look calm and measured.
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,813

    Stocky said:

    UK COVID Summary

    Cases - rising. London is really accelerating now. Reaching into the older groups
    Admissions - rising. London is really not looking good
    Deaths - surprisingly flat so far. That will change.

    image

    Hospitalisation rising but only 4% higher than same day last week (7672 vs 7373).
    Look at the regional graphs - that's why I posted them. An iron law of the epidemic is that what starts happening in a couple of regions, will be coming to your area. Real soon now....
    You may well be right, although regarding London, it's hampered by high population density, high reliance on public transport, and a lot of people who are poor and/or from ethnic minorities - both indicators for suboptimal health outcomes and vaccine hesitancy. If the hospitalisation problem spreads into the Home Counties then that would be a more alarming indicator of a possible re-run of last January.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586

    TOPPING said:

    Having studied all the experts on this thread, and other sources, I'm pleased to say I think I've come up with a definitive answer to the question of the impact of Omicron in the UK.

    Question: Will Omicron lead to unbearable pressure on the NHS and an unacceptable level of deaths?

    Answer: I don't know, and nor does anybody else. Get back to me in 4-6 weeks for an updated definitive answer.

    Oh so now you're a grandfather you've come over all wise and knowledgeable, eh?

    :smile:
    Very good. I was wise and knowledgeable before, but grandfather-hood has led to an exponential growth in my wisdom and knowledgeability. Sadly, it's not contagious.
    Sagacity is the word you are looking for.

    You now have more sagacity than Plato's Academy during a lunchtime test of the Philosopher's Dining problem.
  • FlatlanderFlatlander Posts: 4,597

    Stocky said:

    UK COVID Summary

    Cases - rising. London is really accelerating now. Reaching into the older groups
    Admissions - rising. London is really not looking good
    Deaths - surprisingly flat so far. That will change.

    image

    Hospitalisation rising but only 4% higher than same day last week (7672 vs 7373).
    Look at the regional graphs - that's why I posted them. An iron law of the epidemic is that what starts happening in a couple of regions, will be coming to your area. Real soon now....
    For once I'm glad that London always gets things first.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077
    edited December 2021
    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Really? - we laughed when Robert Peston made the comment a while back but I don't think the methodology has changed.

    Oh and I would recommend posting something beyond a single word reply - it's not adding anything and will probably result in someone's account being suspended as the admins get fed up with it.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,477

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Isn’t that fake news? It has greater reinfections than Delta, but still in low single figures in percentage terms I think.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586
    Maffew said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    dixiedean said:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/dec/14/motorist-jailed-for-running-over-cyclist-who-spat-on-his-car

    18 months. What do we think? I'm not sure why the driver wasn't prosecuted for attempted murder.

    Violent criminal who is "one of us."
    Not "one of them."
    Aside from the sentence.
    3 year ban? For a man prepared to use his vehicle as a weapon?
    If it had been a gun, would he ever be allowed one again? I think not.
    A 74 year old engineer is "one of us?"

    I think this is another case of "With cars, it is completely different" - it's as if there is a special sentencing section for "done with a car"
    Quite.

    You would have thought that the concept of a car as a weapon had been demonstrated well enough recently.

    Why is it OK to terrorise cyclists but not pedestrians?
    Only fair, seeingf as how cyclists terrorise us pedestrians. (Not serious in that sense: but still there is an issue.)
    You might want to ask why cyclists are terrorising pedestrians (if they are, I don't) when it is always quicker to ride on the road...
    Where I live, they find it quicker to ride on the pavement and n pedestrianised areas!
    Safer, generally.

    A comic note - on one of the approach roads to Richmond park, the cycle path is a bit of a wide pavement, marked off.

    Since Richmond park is a very popular venue for cycling, you might think this gets used a lot. It doesn't.

    The pavement is moderately irregular - to the point of making it unpleasant to ride on with a mountain bike with front fork suspension.

    Nearly all of the cyclists heading to and from Richmond park are on racing bikes - part of the attraction of Richmond Park is the good road surfaces.
    It's also narrow and you have to give way at side roads.
    Someone offended me quite badly by suggesting it was a chocolate teapot.

    If you have a chocolate teapot, you have chocolate. If you have a complete useless cyclepath, you don't have chocolate....
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,114
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    Friday night in the city. Relais de Venise had a queue out of the door. The Counting House was rammo until later than usual.

    Was in Balham on Sunday. Pub quiz as busy and rowdy as ever.

    I went to Soho last night.

    The waiting time for Zedels was 90 minutes.

    On a Monday.

    My main impression so far:

    Many people are happy to revert to WFH in the run up to Xmas. But they're still boozing and enjoying themselves. And us youngsters want to crack on.

    I'd be surprised if restos wanted added work of vaccine passports. They all seem understaffed at the moment as it is.

    Also Ottolenghi in Spitalfields on Saturday.

    Basically I've eaten really well this weekend. And so have lots of others. Don't see people voting with their feet in the same way as before.
  • MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Bless
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    That's probably because both cases and deaths fell to a fraction of their level in early January within a few months of him leaving office. They have picked up and are currently running at about half that peak level. Once omicron takes hold I am guessing we will see new peaks, but those affected will mostly be freedom loving Trumpster anti vaxers so they won't be complaining and I'm guessing nobody else will either.
    And we lack a President who will create a story by saying or doing something moronic on a daily basis.
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,813

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    Friday night in the city. Relais de Venise had a queue out of the door. The Counting House was rammo until later than usual.

    Was in Balham on Sunday. Pub quiz as busy and rowdy as ever.

    I went to Soho last night.

    The waiting time for Zedels was 90 minutes.

    On a Monday.

    My main impression so far:

    Many people are happy to revert to WFH in the run up to Xmas. But they're still boozing and enjoying themselves. And us youngsters want to crack on.

    I'd be surprised if restos wanted added work of vaccine passports. They all seem understaffed at the moment as it is.

    Who exactly is going to enforce these vaxports? I suppose you could make them a sale condition of buying a round, which is not quite the same thing.
    That is a good point. In theory I expect the poor bloody businesses are going to have to check them on the doors. In practice, it's not as if the police are liable to be dressing up in civvies and doing secret customer swoops on these establishments to see whether or not they're bothering. Or at least I hope not.

    The authorities may be reliant on indignant sticklers amongst the general population to grass up places that aren't doing the checks.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528
    eek said:

    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Really - we laughed when Robert Peston made the comment a while back but I don't think the methodology has changed.
    No the moronic bit is suggesting that Omicron completely evades immunity from prior infection. We know that not to be true. RP is a moron and he's making things up to support his pro-lockdown forever view. I know he says otherwise but every post he makes is filled with the same bullshit zero COVID rhetoric from last year.
  • Pulpstar said:

    What's the daily CONFIRMED Omicron number (No not Javid's) ?

    Can't find it anywhere.

    It will appear here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-sars-cov-2-variants-technical-briefings

    Latest is yesterday's
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736
    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    Bit weak, mate.
    Bit weak? Quoting the anti-vaccine crap I was replying to?

    Jesus wept!
  • rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    This has been the case for many months. Not heard of a single restaurant that requires them, although lots of events venues have been doing so. Any restaurant with a front of house could have implemented it anytime since July without much hassle. Massive seller of your 60-70%, doubt it would be even 6-7% voluntarily enforcing it.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,077
    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    Friday night in the city. Relais de Venise had a queue out of the door. The Counting House was rammo until later than usual.

    Was in Balham on Sunday. Pub quiz as busy and rowdy as ever.

    I went to Soho last night.

    The waiting time for Zedels was 90 minutes.

    On a Monday.

    My main impression so far:

    Many people are happy to revert to WFH in the run up to Xmas. But they're still boozing and enjoying themselves. And us youngsters want to crack on.

    I'd be surprised if restos wanted added work of vaccine passports. They all seem understaffed at the moment as it is.

    London was busy all weekend. The only place that was quiet was the restaurant in Fenwicks Bond Street and that was probably because few people know Fenwicks exists (it was surprisingly quiet given how busy Bond Street was).
  • Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Isn’t that fake news? It has greater reinfections than Delta, but still in low single figures in percentage terms I think.
    In Wales, if you test positive after six weeks, you get counted again in the headline figure.

    There has been no explosion in Welsh cases.
  • New market: Will pubs in England be forced to close again by the end of January 2022?

    https://smarkets.com/event/42517275/politics/uk/coronavirus/pubs-to-close-again
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,921
    pigeon said:

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    Good for them.

    Vaccines have been rolled out, why shouldn't they have freedom? 👍
    Vaccines have indeed been rolled out, but the state of the vaccination programme varies wildly between the states.

    According to the helpful resource provided by ourworldindata.org, as of yesterday the UK had delivered 178 doses per 100 people, versus 146 in the US. However, looking at the states individually, only one (Vermont, 190 doses/100 people) is ahead of us, whereas at the other end of the scale Idaho has only managed 110.

    In short, if Britain, which has managed to get at least one dose into almost 90% of everyone over the age of 12, is meant to be in considerable peril from Omicron, the Americans may well be stuffed as TSE suggests.
    I have friends who have a blueberry and hazelnut farm in Oregon. They are vaccinated, but it probably doesn't matter. The reality is that they sometimes go weeks without seeing other people. Idaho is going to have plenty of people on farms like that, who simply don't interact with other people regularly.

    Rural America probably doesn't have to worry too much.

    Urban America, on the other hand, will have big problems.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528

    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Bless
    Going to provide evidence that Omicron completely evades prior immunity then? Oh right you can't.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 49,586

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Isn’t that fake news? It has greater reinfections than Delta, but still in low single figures in percentage terms I think.
    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.11.21266068v2

    Raw numbers

    "Results 35,670 suspected reinfections were identified among 2,796,982 individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 who had a positive test result at least 90 days prior to 27 November 2021."

  • Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Isn’t that fake news? It has greater reinfections than Delta, but still in low single figures in percentage terms I think.
    "Fake news". We know for a fact that the "catch rate" of infections is a percentage of the total. The official number is estimated by them to be c. 40% of the total number of actual infections. And its true that they don't count reinfections.

    So even if the reinfection rate is only say 8% higher than Delta, we can do the maths easily. 60k cases today is 40%, so 150k total. And as that number rises the 8% example (if thats correct) propels the gap higher and the % caught in the official figure gets lower.

    Either way the 200k that was rounds mocked by some on here the other day sounds like its realistic based on this.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,753
    edited December 2021
    Chris said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    Bit weak, mate.
    Bit weak? Quoting the anti-vaccine crap I was replying to?

    Jesus wept!
    Chris there you are. Please let us know what your plan is for the next 18 months would be very grateful. Also this 800k cases/day looks bolted on. Let me know how much free money you would like for our bet. I have a maximum obvs but it might do your self-esteem a ton of good to win something like this.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,921
    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    Don't spout crap

    Would you like to me to compare your forecasts for Covid cases in the UK with mine? And then we can talk about who has been talking crap.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528
    edited December 2021

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Isn’t that fake news? It has greater reinfections than Delta, but still in low single figures in percentage terms I think.
    "Fake news". We know for a fact that the "catch rate" of infections is a percentage of the total. The official number is estimated by them to be c. 40% of the total number of actual infections. And its true that they don't count reinfections.

    So even if the reinfection rate is only say 8% higher than Delta, we can do the maths easily. 60k cases today is 40%, so 150k total. And as that number rises the 8% example (if thats correct) propels the gap higher and the % caught in the official figure gets lower.

    Either way the 200k that was rounds mocked by some on here the other day sounds like its realistic based on this.
    It's ~5%. You've literally made up that 40% figure from thin air.
  • eek said:

    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Really? - we laughed when Robert Peston made the comment a while back but I don't think the methodology has changed.

    Oh and I would recommend posting something beyond a single word reply - it's not adding anything and will probably result in someone's account being suspended as the admins get fed up with it.
    I like him calling me a moron as he flails about in a panicked rage. If thats an outlet to keep him sane as the shitey depressing reality kicks in I am happy to provide the service.

    I was an elected councillor where the mayor / council chair posted on Facebook that I should go back to where I came from and never darken his town again with my forrin genes. I laughed at that, I'm hardly going to be wound up by "moron" comments. It only bites when you respect their opinion.
  • Pagan2Pagan2 Posts: 9,848

    Mortimer said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Regarding vaccine passports, can I suggest a compromise?

    Firms are free to require vaccine passports, but are not obliged. We would probably find that 60-70% of restaurants would require them (pretty much any with elder clientele), but individual businesses would not be forced to require them.

    Friday night in the city. Relais de Venise had a queue out of the door. The Counting House was rammo until later than usual.

    Was in Balham on Sunday. Pub quiz as busy and rowdy as ever.

    I went to Soho last night.

    The waiting time for Zedels was 90 minutes.

    On a Monday.

    My main impression so far:

    Many people are happy to revert to WFH in the run up to Xmas. But they're still boozing and enjoying themselves. And us youngsters want to crack on.

    I'd be surprised if restos wanted added work of vaccine passports. They all seem understaffed at the moment as it is.

    Who exactly is going to enforce these vaxports? I suppose you could make them a sale condition of buying a round, which is not quite the same thing.
    Simple loophole there, each group only needs one person with a vaxport and just send them up with the money
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,921
    MaxPB said:

    tlg86 said:

    glw said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    If anything some of the states are becoming more idiotically opposed to taking action agains the coronavirus since Trump left. Their leaders see to see it as taking a stand against Biden and the Democrats by allowing many more of those they represent to die in the name of "freedom".
    I see New York has it bad again...

    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/new-york/
    Impossible, they all wear masks! I've been told repeatedly that this is impossible.
    Ummm... New York has been very much a mask free zone.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528
    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chris said:

    Eabhal said:

    Chris said:

    Mortimer said:

    Mortimer said:

    MaxPB said:

    MaxPB said:

    I have to say in two years "exit the virus" is surely up there among the most stupid things said about it. That there's anyone who believes that is worrying and the government Comms needs to be updated to warn everyone that we're all going to get it and the best way to decrease likelihood of symptoms is to get vaccinated. There is no other game in town.

    I agree! So why do you keep saying we had an exit wave?
    Because we did? Immunity and vaccine coverage in the UK is the highest in the world. Despite all of the doom rhetoric from the scientists we're not in any lockdown while most of Europe has got severe restrictions on going anywhere. Omicron may change the game, it may not. But in the summer to now 11-13m people got the virus, 70-80% of them unvaccinated by choice. Would you rather they had zero immunity heading into the Omicron wave?

    Don't take my word for it Chris Whitty said it in June. It was and remains the right strategy, everyone is going ti get COVID. Lockdowns and NPIs displace infections, but now the vaccine cavalry is already here, last winter it wasn't so displacement of 1000 infections was ~9.5 lives saved. Today displacement of infections will save close to zero lives, anyone who wants to be can get vaccinated. I walked into a pharmacy with my wife yesterday and we both got our boosters.

    Again and again, the only game in town is vaccines. Lockdowns will do nothing because the moment we unlock the virus will be back. Infecting all those same idiots who refused the vaccine. Lockdown to save people who refused the vaccine is immoral, better to tell them to die at home.
    The reality is that those who are calling for lockdowns are looking for a legislative safety blanket where none exists.

    It has been my view throughout that it is not the role of the state to protect people from a virus. Measures to fundamentally restrict the liberties of e.g. children to 'protect' the very elderly and vulnerable are not IMO morally justified at the current CFR. Excessive safetyism is not a road I want the state to go down.

    I am very proud to see so many Tory 'rebel' MPs standing up for liberty today. I would vote exactly the same way.
    So I read, I am a foaming lockdown forever advocate. And yet I said days ago I would also vote against. We need measures to sustain businesses who get screwed by the shutdown being caused by Omicron running rampant. Not half-measures and excuses.

    We need to see MPs back reviewing the latest data and proposals as they come out - instead Javid is proposing another enabling act where Peppa will rule by decree through the Christmas recess.

    Unacceptable.
    Or let those of us who want to continue as is, continue.

    I'm in my early 30s. As are most of my mates. All of us just want to crack on.

    Could you make it any more obvious you think you're invulnerable and you couldn't give a damn about anyone else?
    @Chris, I'm in my late 20s so liable to piss you off even more than Mortimer.

    The disease appears to be even less dangerous to us than it was before. We've got vaxxed even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so.

    Uni/college students and school pupils have missed out on the education that we all got. And people my age haven't travelled, met partners etc for nearly two years.

    Do you give a damn about anyone else?
    Not about people who are so self-obsessed that they're willing to put a higher priority on travel, "meeting partners" and respecting their anti-vaccine fantasies than on giving a toss whether other people die or not.

    It's not that I think I'm particularly at risk myself. I don't have any particular risk factors and I've had a booster. It's just that people like you turn my stomach with your grotesque selfishness.
    Ummm, other than @rural_voter, who has "anti-vaccine fantasies" on here?
    The bloke I was replying to, in the post I was replying to, when he said "even when it was probably not in our personal interest to do so [get vaccinated, even though he was in his 20s]".

    Recommendation: Don't spout crap, unless you can be bothered to read what you're spouting about (or unless this site is now an anti-vaccination propaganda outlet).
    Don't spout crap

    Would you like to me to compare your forecasts for Covid cases in the UK with mine? And then we can talk about who has been talking crap.
    Honestly, Robert, there's a lot of crap being spouted today, I'm learning that all of the studies into reinfection are completely wrong and it's actually 40%, not 5%. But it's fine, @RochdalePioneers needs a way to deflect from the fact that he was wrong to oppose a full reopening and building a wall of natural immunity. Made up figures are all good if you have a point to make.
  • MaxPB said:

    eek said:

    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Really - we laughed when Robert Peston made the comment a while back but I don't think the methodology has changed.
    No the moronic bit is suggesting that Omicron completely evades immunity from prior infection. We know that not to be true. RP is a moron and he's making things up to support his pro-lockdown forever view. I know he says otherwise but every post he makes is filled with the same bullshit zero COVID rhetoric from last year.
    Yes the notion that prior infection provides zero protection against Omicron has to be the most absurd hysterical nonsense of this entire pandemic.

    And he's inventing it because he wants to prove prior infections were a bad idea, not a good thing.

    Either no intellectual honesty, or a complete moron.
  • This should help reduce the number of Tory rebels.

    Jeremy Corbyn just hinted he'll vote against the "totally wrong attempt to force vaccinations and passports on people".

    Was in response to Labour MP Rachael Maskell opposing mandatory vaccinations in the NHS, but line about passports suggests his broader opposition


    https://twitter.com/hzeffman/status/1470798733340258312
  • kinabalu said:

    tlg86 said:

    Does anyone have a précis of the Omicron situation in the United States?

    Given the high level of unvaccinated out there it's going to cause carnage isn't it?

    Since the orange one left office, our media has stopped reporting on COVID in the US&A.
    That's probably because both cases and deaths fell to a fraction of their level in early January within a few months of him leaving office. They have picked up and are currently running at about half that peak level. Once omicron takes hold I am guessing we will see new peaks, but those affected will mostly be freedom loving Trumpster anti vaxers so they won't be complaining and I'm guessing nobody else will either.
    And we lack a President who will create a story by saying or doing something moronic on a daily basis.
    Is this the start of a campaign for President Burgon of the UK?
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528

    MaxPB said:

    eek said:

    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Really - we laughed when Robert Peston made the comment a while back but I don't think the methodology has changed.
    No the moronic bit is suggesting that Omicron completely evades immunity from prior infection. We know that not to be true. RP is a moron and he's making things up to support his pro-lockdown forever view. I know he says otherwise but every post he makes is filled with the same bullshit zero COVID rhetoric from last year.
    Yes the notion that prior infection provides zero protection against Omicron has to be the most absurd hysterical nonsense of this entire pandemic.

    And he's inventing it because he wants to prove prior infections were a bad idea, not a good thing.

    Either no intellectual honesty, or a complete moron.
    That's all he wants, for everyone who suggested building up natural immunity over the summer to be wrong. How can he now admit that it was a good idea?
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528

    eek said:

    MaxPB said:

    Don't forget folks, the infections number is the government measure that counts first infections only. And Omicron cares not whether you had a previous variant.

    Moron.
    Really? - we laughed when Robert Peston made the comment a while back but I don't think the methodology has changed.

    Oh and I would recommend posting something beyond a single word reply - it's not adding anything and will probably result in someone's account being suspended as the admins get fed up with it.
    I like him calling me a moron as he flails about in a panicked rage. If thats an outlet to keep him sane as the shitey depressing reality kicks in I am happy to provide the service.

    I was an elected councillor where the mayor / council chair posted on Facebook that I should go back to where I came from and never darken his town again with my forrin genes. I laughed at that, I'm hardly going to be wound up by "moron" comments. It only bites when you respect their opinion.
    No panic, I just actually think you're a moron. I think you have so little understanding about what you're talking about but keep spouting the same bullshit zero COVID lies that it must mean you're a moron. I don't think you're being dishonest, you just simply lack the mental capacity to understand.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 77,890

    Pulpstar said:

    What's the daily CONFIRMED Omicron number (No not Javid's) ?

    Can't find it anywhere.

    It will appear here:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-sars-cov-2-variants-technical-briefings

    Latest is yesterday's
    OK

    The sequencing from the 13th is of 10th/11th December.

    The S gene target failure (Probable Omicron) is 20.6% with 3,110 new cases.

    That means the probable number of Omicron is 48,854 * 20.6% with 10,063 cases.

    So we're sequencing ~ 31% (Or a third is near enough close)
This discussion has been closed.