Categories
Options
LAB could be taking a big risk with ads like this – politicalbetting.com
LAB could be taking a big risk with ads like this – politicalbetting.com
It will be interesting to see if this approach cuts through. I'm expecting at least one poll tonight which asks how corrupt voters think BoJo is https://t.co/uqBoQ19Xdx
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The paper I bought today (Daily Star, they'd run out of Expresses and I can't afford broadsheets) - Said this-
Bozo Off Hook-
Bozo Johnson's holiday to Marbella at Tory peer Zac Goldsmith's villa has been declared in accordance with rules.
Labour's deputy Angela Rayner said it had not been declared. But a Downing Street spokesman said "The Prime Minister met transparency requirement requirements in relation to this"
180 or so, to chase 2nd place in the league, not that England will care too much if it means the convicts get knocked out…
There are several fundamentals:
The Tories truly are corrupt. Openly, brazenly. So there isn't a "Jennifer's Ear" risk where they get caught in a lie
The public don't care. Previous political standards have been set aside.
So this either cuts through or it doesn't - I don't see the downside in taking the risk in calling a corrupt party out as corrupt. Also, with the Electoral Commission about to report and the Independent Standards Commissioner about to go into bat there is plenty of new material that could follow quickly.
Build a narrative that takes on a life of its own and the gamble pays off.
Who you on with?
Better than the scoreboard in the ground!
Should either go bust you're probably going to be screwed as to your money.
So Smarkets have a liquidity issue in that nobody has so much money there. They also have the ridiculous chance percentage system which makes total sense in the abstract, but runs against far too many accustomed habits.
But no betting market existed before today.
Edit I think England's run rate is such that they have nothing to fear
Double jabbed: flu and booster on same day, one in each arm.
No side effects so far...
If England score 86 or less, it's SA, Aus, Eng, and England knocked out.
87-105, and it's SA, Eng, Aus, and Australia knocked out.
106-131 and it's Eng, SA, Aus, with Australia knocked out.
132+ and it's Eng, Aus, SA, with SA knocked out.
(someone might want to check my numbers, but that's what I've got)
Two words: Edwina Currie!
There was an earlier Smarkets market for a Labour lead bet so ease off!
Just realised that's a much harder bet to win when batting second as can run out of runs to chase and have too many 6s but not enough 4s or vice versa.
Brandreth; 'he is such a gentleman. Edwina told me that when they shared a bath he always sat with his back to the taps.'
Merton: 'I'd have sat with my back to her.'
*improbable though that sentence may seem.
Nope, missing.
What’s the TV delay, enough for courtsiding bets?
Australia hatersProtea supporters.The end of Johnson and Nippy would be cause for celebration. Much less concerned about the Labour lead, than seeing the back of Boris the Clown and Wee Jimmy Krankie. That would be such a bonus.
Was wondering if anyone here can take advantage, if I were to post W, 4 and 6 as quickly as possible?
The smallest non-prime btw.
Clearly very, very unfortunate for Roy.
Edit - looks like severe cramp. Hope it's nothing more serious.
I think the delay between you posting and us getting the info would be too long.
I know nothing of it as a number. Not even the slightest of interesting mathematical facts. I know very little about any of this by the way.
He has resigned as an MP Angela
Has Claudia Webb, and how about the £249 you falsely claimed for Air pods Angela