politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » LAB in lead for first time since last May as the Tories pay
Comments
-
Congratulations Lucian!0
-
I thought the Tory vote was split around 50-50 on the EU issue (and much more in his favour on other issues)? Granted, it's not my party, but if a party is split on an issue in such proportions is it really disloyalty to back either side?Dixie said:
Not a fluke. Bleeding obvious. And it is Cameron's fault. He needs to shut up and back the blue side the the Liberal elite. Zac only has 10% chance. Cameron ha skilled him, perhaps deliberately. But Cameron likely to face leadership challenge for his dis-loyalty to the party.bigjohnowls said:
OutliersSpeedy said:Spot the pattern:
ComRes
CON -3
LAB +2
ICM
CON -3
LAB +4
YouGov
CON -4
LAB +4
This is not a fluke.
Of course, many get around that by just claiming nearly all Remainers don't believe it they are just gutless, which I think is more insulting than necessary, and I'm a Leaver!
0 -
Nus Ghani has an "interesting" CV...Tykejohnno said:
Three women candidates -SeanT said:The idea of Osborne as leader is laughable. He must surely see that.
Difficult to see a REMAINIAC winning in any event.
People are skeptical of Boris, Gove is damaged by the Queen thingy, so.... who? If not BoJo?
Penny Mordaunt,Andrea Leadsom and Nus Ghani.0 -
Yes, we appear to be at a point where the public will punish any further cuts that break through into popular discourse at least, but I'd bet good money still won't accept any other measures to pay for what they expect the government to do.MikeL said:
I think we're now at the stage where no benefits can be cut at all - in cash terms. .0 -
-
To be fair, your analysis and foresight was very good there.AlastairMeeks said:
*cough*SeanT said:
Seems to me that the Tory party has fallen apart ever since Cameron brought back the dreadful "deal"TheScreamingEagles said:I've not see so much interest in a poll since the YouGov poll during the Indyref that put Yes ahead.
When historians look at British political history I suspect they will date the peak of Tory hubris to the day before the Deal, when all seemed sunlit uplands: Corbyn as the feeble joke enemy, the Scot Nats defeated, the Lib Dems humiliated, UKIP at bay, the EU referendum a shoo-in.
And now, here we are.
I expect the Tories to win in 2020 if Corbyn stays leader, but the Tories won't be this cocky again for a generation. Or more.
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2015/10/15/antifrank-on-how-the-conservatives-will-lose-their-hegemony/0 -
I'm surprised the whole, remove all schools from local authory control thing, hasn't had more air time.0
-
0
-
The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.0 -
Seems IDS was behind the PIP reductions0
-
It is pretty dire when Emily Thornberry is the best of the bunch.Tykejohnno said:What a awful panel.
twitter.com/bbcquestiontime/status/7105983704406507540 -
No, it really is just about those blue-on-blue attacks. The Tory voters just have a wave of apathy for the party.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.0 -
I stopped watching it years agoTykejohnno said:What a awful panel.
https://twitter.com/bbcquestiontime/status/7105983704406507540 -
And to think morgan thinks she PM material ;-)foxinsoxuk said:
It is pretty dire when Emily Thornberry is the best of the bunch.Tykejohnno said:What a awful panel.
twitter.com/bbcquestiontime/status/7105983704406507540 -
Councils are not exactly highly regarded as institutions...Alistair said:I'm surprised the whole, remove all schools from local authory control thing, hasn't had more air time.
One size fits all education has never been overwhelmingly popular either.
The only people on my timeline who are angry at this are old fashioned Northern lefities. The sort who would rail against the Tories for anything.0 -
Speaking as someone without children, I've never been interested enough to know what academy status means and why it is good/bad, but given how it engages some people so intently I too am surprised the latest happening hasn't been a bigger deal.Alistair said:I'm surprised the whole, remove all schools from local authory control thing, hasn't had more air time.
0 -
Morgan backing away from the disability changes already (while looking like a frightened owl)Tykejohnno said:
And to think morgan thinks she PM material ;-)foxinsoxuk said:
It is pretty dire when Emily Thornberry is the best of the bunch.Tykejohnno said:What a awful panel.
twitter.com/bbcquestiontime/status/7105983704406507540 -
Come on Tories
Vote for a LEAVE man right after the country votes REMAIN
Give us Gove and make the next election competitive0 -
1) 90%+ of people won't have the faintest idea what Cameron got / didn't get from the EU.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
2) If it was EU related, polls would have moved 3 weeks ago, not just now.
3) Lab is more pro EU than Con - so EU dissatisfaction cannot explain Con to Lab shift
It's far more likely to be due to:
1) Con disunity
2) Corbyn less in news - less focus on Lab
3) Budget / economic concerns
4) Disability proposals making Con look like Nasty Party0 -
It's back to 2011-12 levels on spending cuts for the government:
https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/710057214652899328
So no surprise that the Tories have slumped to 2011-12 levels again.0 -
A fair interpretation.MikeL said:
1) 90%+ of people won't have the faintest idea what Cameron got / didn't get from the EU.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
2) If it was EU related, polls would have moved 3 weeks ago, not just now.
3) Lab is more pro EU than Con - so EU dissatisfaction cannot explain Con to Lab shift
Blues knocking lumps off each other is all that is required.0 -
Ian Birrell @ianbirrell
Listening to Nicky Morgan on #bbcqt, sounds like government preparing for rapid U-turn on disability benefit cuts. Good news if true
Sebastian Payne @SebastianEPayne
Nicky Morgan on PIP cuts in the Budget: “we are still engaged in a discussion” #bbcqt0 -
The result of a part time chancellor. Just trying to take all the decisions and not doing a thorough job.glw said:
The omnishambles budget was like that as well. The Treasury seem to make a right balls up in a relatively minor change that overshadows the whole.kle4 said:That's the trouble of course - the budget might not actually be that bad, and the bits that are may well be reversed, but all that will be remembered is the initial reaction.
0 -
When will Cameron and Osborne realise this?TheWhiteRabbit said:
No, it really is just about those blue-on-blue attacks. The Tory voters just have a wave of apathy for the party.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
0 -
LOL. Osborne is the gift that keeps on giving.Tykejohnno said:Ian Birrell @ianbirrell
Listening to Nicky Morgan on #bbcqt, sounds like government preparing for rapid U-turn on disability benefit cuts. Good news if true
Sebastian Payne @SebastianEPayne
Nicky Morgan on PIP cuts in the Budget: “we are still engaged in a discussion” #bbcqt0 -
No it stems from treasury plans from before 2013 and court decisions.Big_G_NorthWales said:Seems IDS was behind the PIP reductions
0 -
Mike Smithson @MSmithsonPB
Meantime Tories lose a council by election.
@britainelects: Liberal Democrat GAIN Aylsham (Broadland) from Conservative.0 -
Jews to boycott Trump
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/group-rabbis-plan-boycott-trump-speech
Well they can't buy him...0 -
*One poll alert*
California: Trump 38, Cruz 22, Kasich 20, Rubio 10
Enough to get Trump 120+ delegates and probably avoid a contested convention, depending on how Rubio's vote (plus undecideds) split.0 -
Switched on QT, interesting hairstyle from Nicky Morgan. (Not being sexist I hope).0
-
A one point opposition lead isn't yet what passes for mid-term success.
And with a referendum that I'd like to see Remain win, the popcorn is going to stay locked in the kitchen cupboard a while longer yet.
Don't rule out the return of insufferably blue bullishness at some point later in the year, even if it turns out again to be short lived.0 -
Lib Dem gain Aylsham from Con
LD 829 Con 654 Lab 2430 -
Being behind Corbyn Labour in a poll. How low the Tories have sunk.0
-
Agreed.SeanT said:
On this - and not much else - I will defend the govt (and indeed the Labour govt prior, which introduced them). Academies are popular. Councils aren't. This is not a vote-changer.Mortimer said:
Councils are not exactly highly regarded as institutions...Alistair said:I'm surprised the whole, remove all schools from local authory control thing, hasn't had more air time.
One size fits all education has never been overwhelmingly popular either.
The only people on my timeline who are angry at this are old fashioned Northern lefities. The sort who would rail against the Tories for anything.
(Nor is it an election winner, as it is seen as bipartisan, if anything)
Short of reintroducing Grammar schools, Academies are an education policy I can support.0 -
I suspect problem for Con is that the public thought the cuts were just about over and the economy was now broadly OK.
Whereas post Budget headlines suggest economic problems ahead.
Result: Public unhappy.
So polls move.0 -
Healthy food is cheaper than unhealthy food. Carrots, beans and cabbage hardly cost anything compared to MacDonalds. (Unless you live in Crouch End, probably).0
-
George Eaton @georgeeaton
After tax credits, Google tax and Sunday Trading, Osborne now heading for retreat over PIP cuts. So many mistakes in so little time.0 -
It is reported in the Telegraph that it was IDS and the DWPTCPoliticalBetting said:
No it stems from treasury plans from before 2013 and court decisions.Big_G_NorthWales said:Seems IDS was behind the PIP reductions
0 -
Agreed - I'm sure people do know that.SeanT said:
People are smart enough to know Cameron got jackshit from Europe.MikeL said:
1) 90%+ of people won't have the faintest idea what Cameron got / didn't get from the EU.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
2) If it was EU related, polls would have moved 3 weeks ago, not just now.
3) Lab is more pro EU than Con - so EU dissatisfaction cannot explain Con to Lab shift
It's far more likely to be due to:
1) Con disunity
2) Corbyn less in news - less focus on Lab
3) Budget / economic concerns
4) Disability proposals making Con look like Nasty Party
But that will not be a driver for Con to Lab movement in voting intention.0 -
Mike Smithson @MSmithsonPB
And another Council defeat for CON
@britainelects: Lincolnshire Independent GAIN Ashby de la Launde & Cranwell (North Kesteven) from CON
Not a good night for the Tories.0 -
My first Question Time for a while. It is shockingly poor.0
-
Con to UKIP possibly though. 33% + 16% is pretty consistent with the GE.MikeL said:
Agreed - I'm sure people do know that.SeanT said:
People are smart enough to know Cameron got jackshit from Europe.MikeL said:
1) 90%+ of people won't have the faintest idea what Cameron got / didn't get from the EU.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
2) If it was EU related, polls would have moved 3 weeks ago, not just now.
3) Lab is more pro EU than Con - so EU dissatisfaction cannot explain Con to Lab shift
It's far more likely to be due to:
1) Con disunity
2) Corbyn less in news - less focus on Lab
3) Budget / economic concerns
4) Disability proposals making Con look like Nasty Party
But that will not be a driver for Con to Lab movement in voting intention.
0 -
breaking: Luxembourg PM tweets that a Turkey migration deal has been agreed...0
-
Seems to me that the Tory party has fallen apart ever since Cameron brought back the dreadful "deal"
Well we shouldn't overreact to a couple of polls.
But - I recall saying that the tactic of taking the public for fools, and indeed publicly gloating about how you are doing just that, was very unwise.0 -
Did you read my post?SeanT said:
But the polls moved BEFORE the Budget. Duh. How many times does this have to be repeated.MikeL said:I suspect problem for Con is that the public thought the cuts were just about over and the economy was now broadly OK.
Whereas post Budget headlines suggest economic problems ahead.
Result: Public unhappy.
So polls move.
The Budget didn't help, but the Tory splits on the EU began damaging HMG a couple of weeks ago.
"Con disunity" was my first reason for the movement in the polls!!!0 -
He's totally focused on taking over from Dave. Everything he does is about that.Tykejohnno said:George Eaton @georgeeaton
After tax credits, Google tax and Sunday Trading, Osborne now heading for retreat over PIP cuts. So many mistakes in so little time.
0 -
Panel or audience?SouthamObserver said:My first Question Time for a while. It is shockingly poor.
0 -
Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.0
-
He seems terrible at it - if he is to succeed Cameron it'll be down to events outside his control like global economic recovery, so he'd do better not trying any maneuvrring and just hoping for the best.SouthamObserver said:
He's totally focused on taking over from Dave. Everything he does is about that.Tykejohnno said:George Eaton @georgeeaton
After tax credits, Google tax and Sunday Trading, Osborne now heading for retreat over PIP cuts. So many mistakes in so little time.
Good night.
0 -
Dave thought he could rush it, bodge it, and sell it. I think we now need to seriously consider the possibility that Dave is in fact a gigantic berk, and not a great statesman.runnymede said:But - I recall saying that the tactic of taking the public for fools, and indeed publicly gloating about how you are doing just that, was very unwise.
0 -
0
-
I think that it is clear that many Tories are for Leave, and even the Remain Tories are halfhearted at best. Voters wanting to kick the government will vote Remain.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
0 -
Where did the telegraph get the information,the Treasury ;-)Big_G_NorthWales said:
It is reported in the Telegraph that it was IDS and the DWPTCPoliticalBetting said:
No it stems from treasury plans from before 2013 and court decisions.Big_G_NorthWales said:Seems IDS was behind the PIP reductions
0 -
The whole thing. Shit panellists, thick audience and a moderator who is all over the place.AndyJS said:
0 -
Boris' disloyalty is really hurting the Tories.0
-
Britain Elects @britainelects
Aylsham (Broadland) result:
LDEM: 48.0% (+17.1)
CON: 37.9% (+5.5)
LAB: 14.1% (-8.0)0 -
Osborne really has turned out to be the most objectionable little sh**, hasn't he? He almost seems to be trying to live up to his own caricature.0
-
It is quite obvious from all the banging on about Europe that the Tories are mostly for Leave. Therefore vote Remain.SeanT said:
uh, no they won't. Not when the Tory PM and the Tory Chancellor are the lead figures for REMAINfoxinsoxuk said:
I think that it is clear that many Tories are for Leave, and even the Remain Tories are halfhearted at best. Voters wanting to kick the government will vote Remain.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
What a silly remark.
Which side are you supporting this week? I find it hard to keep up with your flip-flopping.0 -
George Parker @GeorgeWParker
According to Nicky Morgan the £4bn of savings in the Budget red book from disability benefit cuts are just "a suggestion" #bbcqt0 -
Of course even IDS had a few poll leads but clearly UKIP hitting the Tory share here, Labour still only on their 1992 share0
-
After the EU referendum start,you can put Dave with him.runnymede said:Osborne really has turned out to be the most objectionable little sh**, hasn't he? He almost seems to be trying to live up to his own caricature.
0 -
What an airhead0
-
Went to the National Portrait Gallery this evening and a man was wearing a 'Making America Great Again' baseball cap, not the place you would normally expect to see a Trump supporter0
-
He did a lot of good things in the budget but the PIP decision is just plain wrong. However the back bencher's will force a change but he is not going to be next PM . (Neither is Boris)runnymede said:Osborne really has turned out to be the most objectionable little sh**, hasn't he? He almost seems to be trying to live up to his own caricature.
0 -
Leave benefits Corbyn rather than Cameron, Corbyn voted against the EEC in 1975 anyway and a Leave vote gets rid of Cameron the Tories' best electoral assetSeanT said:
Yes. I see these as BAD polls for REMAIN. The more unpopular Cameron and the Tories become, the more likely voters will ether tick LEAVE to piss off the government or simply abstain and enjoy Tory infighting.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
A double edged sword for lefty europhiles, like yourself. I can easily see this vote being won by LEAVE, because of Labourite apathy - as you have often pointed out.0 -
Be a good idea to get rid of Corbyn at the same timeHYUFD said:
Leave benefits Corbyn rather than Cameron, Corbyn voted against the EEC in 1975 anyway and a Leave vote gets rid of Cameron the Tories' best electoral assetSeanT said:
Yes. I see these as BAD polls for REMAIN. The more unpopular Cameron and the Tories become, the more likely voters will ether tick LEAVE to piss off the government or simply abstain and enjoy Tory infighting.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
A double edged sword for lefty europhiles, like yourself. I can easily see this vote being won by LEAVE, because of Labourite apathy - as you have often pointed out.0 -
This is what Question Time used to be like in June 1984:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ6NPDCbqPE0 -
Pat Buchanan declares for Trump?
'Talking heads are bobbing up on cable TV to declare that if Trump is nominee, they will not vote for him and may vote for Clinton.
This is not unwelcome news. Let them go.
Their departure testifies that Trump is offering something new and different from the foreign policy failures this crowd did so much to produce.
The worst mistake Trump could make would be to tailor his winning positions on trade, immigration and intervention – to court such losers.'
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/suicide-of-gop-or-its-rebirth/#C0KWZspeTY7d61K1.990 -
Zacs odds just get longer....
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-zac-goldsmith-forced-out-7574364#ICID=sharebar_twitter0 -
Corbyn is about as anti EU a leader as Labour are going to get, as I said a Leave vote boosts CorbynBig_G_NorthWales said:
Be a good idea to get rid of Corbyn at the same timeHYUFD said:
Leave benefits Corbyn rather than Cameron, Corbyn voted against the EEC in 1975 anyway and a Leave vote gets rid of Cameron the Tories' best electoral assetSeanT said:
Yes. I see these as BAD polls for REMAIN. The more unpopular Cameron and the Tories become, the more likely voters will ether tick LEAVE to piss off the government or simply abstain and enjoy Tory infighting.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
A double edged sword for lefty europhiles, like yourself. I can easily see this vote being won by LEAVE, because of Labourite apathy - as you have often pointed out.0 -
Simon Richards @simplysimontfa
Emily Thornberry is right to worry about jobs if we leave the EU: the cost of one's domestic servants will go up, as Lord Rose confirmed0 -
Detectives have begun an investigation into allegations of fraud involving the Police Federation of England and Wales.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-358385640 -
Toby Young @toadmeister
If you're interested in the case for #Brexit, I set it out here (and consider the case for Remain, too) http://www.eu-facts.org.uk/2016/03/17/toby-young-why-ill-be-voting-leave-on-23-june/ … #bbcqt
Toby Young: Why I’ll be voting Leave on 23 June
http://www.eu-facts.org.uk/2016/03/17/toby-young-why-ill-be-voting-leave-on-23-june/0 -
The third favourite to be POTUS with Betfair Exchange is more than 40/1. Looks like punters have decided it'll be Clinton vs Trump.0
-
BwahahaFrancisUrquhart said:
Detectives have begun an investigation into allegations of fraud involving the Police Federation of England and Wales.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-358385640 -
Google Puts Boston Dynamics Up for Sale in Robotics Retreat
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-17/google-is-said-to-put-boston-dynamics-robotics-unit-up-for-sale
Perhaps we are safe for a few more years from the bots taking all our jobs.0 -
Went through an admissions appeals process for an academy last year, basically a lot of the same back offices services are contracted back to the council in many cases, but the accountability chain is weakened. We got into appealing the appeal decision and found a lot of detailed guidelines on precedent just didn't apply to academies, even though they were contracted in to an identical appeals process as an LEA school, and the ultimate appeal was to a funding body which was acting somehow as an ombudsman. So, to academise everything the accountability chain certainly needs some improvement. The BBC did note today that DoE is considered to be struggling with their new responsibilities, and that chimes.SeanT said:
On this - and not much else - I will defend the govt (and indeed the Labour govt prior, which introduced them). Academies are popular. Councils aren't. This is not a vote-changer.Mortimer said:
Councils are not exactly highly regarded as institutions...Alistair said:I'm surprised the whole, remove all schools from local authory control thing, hasn't had more air time.
One size fits all education has never been overwhelmingly popular either.
The only people on my timeline who are angry at this are old fashioned Northern lefities. The sort who would rail against the Tories for anything.
(Nor is it an election winner, as it is seen as bipartisan, if anything)
I wonder if by completing the academy conversion process, the government is actually wanting to go back to a more LEA style setup, just without the involvement of the Local Authorities. Essentially the council education departments will be privatised/mutualised becoming third-sector/private academy chains (plus back office services companies that will ultimately be absorbed into all those multinational, often French, service organisations). The ex-LEA academy chains are likely to be stronger than existing bottom up academy chains, potentially absorbing back in schools both inside and outside their parent LEAs. Watch out for those director pay and bonus, consultancy fees and mergers & acquistion stories. I also wonder if the relevant sections of LGOs and various other bodies with a finger in the education pie will be spun off more like the regulators for the utility industries and whether they will sit separately or as part of an expanded Ofsted.0 -
Merrill Arizona
GOP
Trump 31
Cruz 19
Kasich 10
Dems
Clinton 50
Sanders 240 -
Well I've been warning the Tories on here about just how complacent and arrogant they have become to believe that any one of them can beat Corbyn in 2020, and lo and behold they find themselves behind for the first time in this parliament. I have cautioned that absolutely nothing is impossible politically over the next 4 years once the sovereign debt crisis gets into full swing. Trump is showing that anything is possible in this climate in the US right now. Nobody should be so complacent as to believe that there is zero chance of Corbyn ever becoming PM. Under a normal economic climate that would be true, but this isn't normal and the level of public anger and outrage with establishment politics around the world now is such that people like Corbyn and Trump and Marine Le Pen could get into power on the back of this seething swell of anger all around us.0
-
Possible but unlikely. I expect Hillary to eventually see off Sanders and then narrowly beat Trump, Hollande to narrowly beat Le Pen in the second round, Remain to narrowly win EU ref and the Tories to be largest party in a hung parliament in 2020. In every case populists will cause the establishment a shock but will not actually win. Economically we have seen the worst of it in 2008 now is just the aftershock of the crash and concern over immigrationhunchman said:Well I've been warning the Tories on here about just how complacent and arrogant they have become to believe that any one of them can beat Corbyn in 2020, and lo and behold they find themselves behind for the first time in this parliament. I have cautioned that absolutely nothing is impossible politically over the next 4 years once the sovereign debt crisis gets into full swing. Trump is showing that anything is possible in this climate in the US right now. Nobody should be so complacent as to believe that there is zero chance of Corbyn ever becoming PM. Under a normal economic climate that would be true, but this isn't normal and the level of public anger and outrage with establishment politics around the world now is such that people like Corbyn and Trump and Marine Le Pen could get into power on the back of this seething swell of anger all around us.
0 -
I agree, except that I think that for once Corbyn and McDonnell made a decent fist out of focusing discontent in their unequivocal reaction to the Budget. There was no little red book, and this time the Conservatives failed to come up with a dead cat beloved of the far left with which to distract them. (Compare and contrast that absence with the masterful timing of Cameron's announcement of a Syria vote to dominate the news headlines the morning after the Autumn Statement, knowing that Corbyn would immediately fall for it and spend a week splitting his party to absolutely no avail.)MikeL said:
1) 90%+ of people won't have the faintest idea what Cameron got / didn't get from the EU.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about the their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
2) If it was EU related, polls would have moved 3 weeks ago, not just now.
3) Lab is more pro EU than Con - so EU dissatisfaction cannot explain Con to Lab shift
It's far more likely to be due to:
1) Con disunity
2) Corbyn less in news - less focus on Lab
3) Budget / economic concerns
4) Disability proposals making Con look like Nasty Party
I share your view that the Conservative disunity on Europe isn't really harming them. It may be helping them. At least it allows neither In nor Out supporters to conclude that their party is unequivocally at odds with their views. The leadership are In, the bulk of the membership Out. By contrast, by claiming that the EU is the best thing since sliced bread, Labour seems to be doing its damnedness to try and give the impression that it doesn't want the votes of all but the most committed Europhile, that is a small minority of the generally Eurosceptic electorate (including those hostile to the EU but reluctantly toying with an In vote as a least bad option).
0 -
I do not think anything will boost Corbyn. If leave win politics will be dominated by the rightHYUFD said:
Corbyn is about as anti EU a leader as Labour are going to get, as I said a Leave vote boosts CorbynBig_G_NorthWales said:
Be a good idea to get rid of Corbyn at the same timeHYUFD said:
Leave benefits Corbyn rather than Cameron, Corbyn voted against the EEC in 1975 anyway and a Leave vote gets rid of Cameron the Tories' best electoral assetSeanT said:
Yes. I see these as BAD polls for REMAIN. The more unpopular Cameron and the Tories become, the more likely voters will ether tick LEAVE to piss off the government or simply abstain and enjoy Tory infighting.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
A double edged sword for lefty europhiles, like yourself. I can easily see this vote being won by LEAVE, because of Labourite apathy - as you have often pointed out.0 -
It rather looks as if ICM were far too quick to rubbish their own poll!0
-
The right will be split if Leave win even more so if a narrow Remain but that at least keeps Cameron in postBig_G_NorthWales said:
I do not think anything will boost Corbyn. If leave win politics will be dominated by the rightHYUFD said:
Corbyn is about as anti EU a leader as Labour are going to get, as I said a Leave vote boosts CorbynBig_G_NorthWales said:
Be a good idea to get rid of Corbyn at the same timeHYUFD said:
Leave benefits Corbyn rather than Cameron, Corbyn voted against the EEC in 1975 anyway and a Leave vote gets rid of Cameron the Tories' best electoral assetSeanT said:
Yes. I see these as BAD polls for REMAIN. The more unpopular Cameron and the Tories become, the more likely voters will ether tick LEAVE to piss off the government or simply abstain and enjoy Tory infighting.NickPalmer said:Great series of polls - as Speedy illustrates, it does qualify as a trend rather than an outlier. A pro-EU concern, though: there is a traditional tendency for referenda to turn into votes for or against the government, especially among voters who don't care very much. If so, it's an awkward moment for Remain for the Tories to shoot themselves in both feet.
A double edged sword for lefty europhiles, like yourself. I can easily see this vote being won by LEAVE, because of Labourite apathy - as you have often pointed out.0 -
Indeed so - but not until 2003 some two years into the 2001 Parliament.HYUFD said:
Bear in mind though that even IDS had a small lead over Labour in a few polls, in his case helped by Labour voters moving to the LDs just as Corbyn is helped by Tories moving to UKIPjustin124 said:It rather looks as if ICM were far too quick to rubbish their own poll!
0 -
Yes but the key was Iraq which moved Labour voters to the LDs and the key now is EU ref moving Tories to UKIP. IDS also thus achieved leads on just 34% as Corbyn has with yougovjustin124 said:
Indeed so - but not until 2003 some two years into the 2001 Parliament.HYUFD said:
Bear in mind though that even IDS had a small lead over Labour in a few polls, in his case helped by Labour voters moving to the LDs just as Corbyn is helped by Tories moving to UKIPjustin124 said:It rather looks as if ICM were far too quick to rubbish their own poll!
0 -
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2016-03-18/trump-clinton-hold-large-leads-in-n-y-primary-races-poll
New York, Emerson:
Trump 64
Cruz 12
Kasich 1
Hillary 71
Sanders 23
Trump would probably gain all 95 N.Y. delegates, that will erase most of his deficit from Ohio, Utah and N.Dakota.
Goodnight.0 -
It is now very reasonable to say that Labour is performing a fair bit better than at the same stage of the 1987 and 1959 Parliaments. I refer to party lead rather than % vote share because national support has become much more fragmented over the last 20 years or so.0
-
Labour won a majority in 1964 and by 1990 were on 50% plus, so Corbyn has a way to go to match that yetjustin124 said:It is now very reasonable to say that Labour is performing a fair bit better than at the same stage of the 1987 and 1959 Parliaments. I refer to party lead rather than % vote share because national support has become much more fragmented over the last 20 years or so.
0 -
My comparison is with how Labour was faring in April 1988 and August 1960.HYUFD said:
Labour won a majority in 1964 and by 1990 were on 50% plus, so Corbyn has a way to go to match that yetjustin124 said:It is now very reasonable to say that Labour is performing a fair bit better than at the same stage of the 1987 and 1959 Parliaments. I refer to party lead rather than % vote share because national support has become much more fragmented over the last 20 years or so.
0 -
In April 1980 Labour had a big lead and was trounced in 1983 polls go up and downjustin124 said:
My comparison is with how Labour was faring in April 1988 and August 1960.HYUFD said:
Labour won a majority in 1964 and by 1990 were on 50% plus, so Corbyn has a way to go to match that yetjustin124 said:It is now very reasonable to say that Labour is performing a fair bit better than at the same stage of the 1987 and 1959 Parliaments. I refer to party lead rather than % vote share because national support has become much more fragmented over the last 20 years or so.
0 -
Morning! And just 200 minutes after the football finished, the new F1 season gets underway at a rather wet Melbourne track. Nyoommm!0
-
Congratulations to Mr and Mrs Fletcher!Lucian_Fletcher said:Oh dear. Osborne made me leave the Tory party in 2012 and he's now given Labour supporters who actually care about elections their first happy time in yonks. Shame that they don't have a team who could capitalise on that. Real shame.
Second boy arrived yesterday, by the way. Home and well so all good!0 -
I can only assume Osborne is on a mission to make Ed Miliband look normal and socially-competent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FvCUbaf9z8&feature=youtu.be0 -
Spot on, Sir.peter_from_putney said:The Tories dramatic loss of support isn't principally about their being split ..... Labour is split too.
It's actually more about Cameron's very considerable failure in obtaining any significantly improved terms from the EU in his so-called re-negotiations and worse still trying to convince the British electorate to believe the contrary, rounded off by a panic referendum to be held in June when he had originally set himself a timetable until the end of 2017, which would have provided sufficient time for a very much more considered and thorough approach towards our original objectives.
In short Cameron has completely blown it and the British people aren't fools - they know they've been badly let down.
0 -
Angie's problems continue. CSU saying they have real issues with the Chancellors policies. Fortunately her socialist partners are being"helpful" by saying she's in team SPD. That should cheer up the right wingers.
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/fluechtlingskrise/verkehrsminister-dobrindt-zwischen-csu-und-cdu-ist-eine-ernste-situation-eingetreten-14131979.html0 -
Classic.Danny565 said:I can only assume Osborne is on a mission to make Ed Miliband look normal and socially-competent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FvCUbaf9z8&feature=youtu.be0