I think she has pulled it back to level - the EC is biased towards the Republicans, currently.
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
I think she has pulled it back to level - the EC is biased towards the Republicans, currently.
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
If I have the energy I will be doing a thread on why it is now possible the Dems lose the popular vote and win the electoral college
Safe choice: Doesn't add much to the ticket, but no obvious skeletons or people likely to be offended. (Although I see Twitter has this story about how he changed the Minnesota state flag so it looked more like the Somali flag, so that Minnesota could be more welcoming to Muslims.)
I think that's wrong.
He will be a hugely popular pick within the Democratic Party - he probably wouldn't even have made it this far had there not been intensive grassroots lobbying for him.
He adds non-Beltway, flyover state cred. And he's a bloody good governor. That's quite significant.
Also ex-teacher, so beyond criticism.
'Corbyn will be a hugely popular pick within the Labour Party - he probably wouldn't even have made it this far had there not been intensive grassroots lobbying for him.'
That you're even comparing the two says much about your comprehension of US politics.
And Corbyn doesn't strike me as the type to spend 24 years serving in the National Guard.
Bernie Sanders also endorsed Joe Biden in 2020 to become President, I am guessing Biden lost after getting the endorsement of Sanders.
After Biden had got the nomination, Sanders was Biden's main opponent in the primaries!
A Harris-Walz ticket basically looks like a Dukakis-Mondale ticket in all but name
Dukakis -Monsale was 40 years ago. It means nothing. You use lots of historical precedents to demonstrate Kamala can't win. These references are meaningless.
It's like saying Aston Villa have a great record of seven wins in the FA Cup, they should be one of the favourites this season!*
NYT - Tim Walz Is Kamala Harris’s Choice for Vice President: Live Election Updates
The Minnesota governor, a former high school teacher and National Guard member, brings to the ticket Midwestern appeal and a plain-spoken way of talking about Donald Trump.
I think she has pulled it back to level - the EC is biased towards the Republicans, currently.
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
If I have the energy I will be doing a thread on why it is now possible the Dems lose the popular vote and win the electoral college
That would be both interesting and valuable. Please do.
To answer the thread - imo we should describe her as the favourite if, and only if, she is shorter odds than Trump in the markets. Even if she were 99% to win in reality. Because that's what favourite means.
To answer the thread - imo we should describe her as the favourite if, and only if, she is shorter odds than Trump in the markets. Even if she were 99% to win in reality. Because that's what favourite means.
I think she has pulled it back to level - the EC is biased towards the Republicans, currently.
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
If I have the energy I will be doing a thread on why it is now possible the Dems lose the popular vote and win the electoral college
That would be both interesting and valuable. Please do.
Please don't. I've been quietly building up a position there in a thin market
Kamala Harris @KamalaHarris I am proud to announce that I've asked @Tim_Walz to be my running mate. As a governor, a coach, a teacher, and a veteran, he's delivered for working families like his. It's great to have him on the team. Now let’s get to work. Join us:
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
You'd think his daughter, Hope, would carefully enunciate her name. I thought she said Ho.
Speaking of names, the Kamala/Walz ticket now has two names with unclear pronunciations. From that video, Walz is pronounced Walls, like ice cream and sausages.
I think she has pulled it back to level - the EC is biased towards the Republicans, currently.
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
If I have the energy I will be doing a thread on why it is now possible the Dems lose the popular vote and win the electoral college
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
The America goes at the top method? The Yanks typically go be number of medals, as opposed to the rest of the world which goes by number of golds. The table you’ve posted appears to be a screwed up hybrid.
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
I'll take a guess. The Chinese have just won their diving gold. The table has updated the Golds for that but, for some reason, it has not been reordered (maybe it is done on a time delay but that feels strange).
So I think it is based on Gold but it may be a timing issue.
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
Doesn't that look like something like a 3, 2, 1 or 3, 1, 1 points system?
The criteria is to avoid the USA's self-regard balloon going pop.
I think she has pulled it back to level - the EC is biased towards the Republicans, currently.
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
If I have the energy I will be doing a thread on why it is now possible the Dems lose the popular vote and win the electoral college
I think that is a good bet.
Differential turnout, or the polls plain wrong?
As it stands, Harris polls slightly ahead on simple votes.
The more I think of the Walz choice, the better it looks. The teacher/union stuff shores up the left - which gets the activists/get out the vote people onboard (a lot of the Democrat party volunteers/low level people are on the Left). Plus he can reach out to Independents - long term National Guard, family man, ran his state well.
EDIT: and, of course, as a Governor, no problems over a Senate seat.
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
The objection to blocking Twitter is not its technical complexity or the symbolism of stricter political censorship than Russia, but kicking off a trade dispute with the incoming President of the United States.
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
It's believed that the bans etc on ISIS and related websites has had next to no effect.
Tragically, @DavidL (among others) can probably confirm that images of utter horror are widespread.
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Walz has two great advantages as a politician: He is not a lawyer -- and he is a winning football coach. (Most Americans dislike lawyers -- and love winning coaches, especially football coaches.) "After returning, Walz took a job teaching and coaching in Alliance, Nebraska, where he met his wife, Gwen Whipple, a fellow teacher.[11] He and Gwen married in 1994, and moved two years later to Mankato in Minnesota, his wife's home state,[11] where he worked as a geography teacher and coach at Mankato West High School.[10] He coached the football team to its first state championship in 1999." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz
And, then there is this: "Walz was ranked the 7th-most bipartisan House member during the 114th Congress (and the most bipartisan member from Minnesota) in the Bipartisan Index created by The Lugar Center and the McCourt School of Public Policy, which ranks members of Congress by measuring how often their bills attract co-sponsors from the opposite party and how often they co-sponsor bills by members of the opposite party."
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
It's believed that the bans etc on ISIS and related websites has had next to no effect.
Tragically, @DavidL (among others) can probably confirm that images of utter horror are widespread.
We have just had a high profile court case opening a window into one way such images are now shared.
Either the Tories or Reform need to take the lead in GE voting intention in the coming polls, as Hauge's Tories did during the fuel protests early in Blair's tenure. If they don't, then it will mean the public regard the Right as equally culpable, which won't do them much good politically.
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Dave had similar levels during the 2011 riots but his ratings improved as time went by as more and more thugs got locked up.
Only 30% say Cameron has done a good job, against 44% who say the opposite, a net negative score of -14. For Johnson, the figures are 28% good job and 38% bad, a negative of -10 points. By contrast, 45% think that the acting commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Tim Godwin, has done well against 27% who say the opposite – a positive score of 18.
Another online poll, conducted this week by YouGov, found similar levels of support for the police response over that of politicians
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
The objection to blocking Twitter is not its technical complexity or the symbolism of stricter political censorship than Russia, but kicking off a trade dispute with the incoming President of the United States.
I don't think it would be much of a trade dispute if the UK decided to block Twitter. Various countries do.
The biggest question would be - why not Telegram and all the others hosting similar (or worse) content?
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
It's believed that the bans etc on ISIS and related websites has had next to no effect.
Tragically, @DavidL (among others) can probably confirm that images of utter horror are widespread.
We have just had a high profile court case opening a window into one way such images are now shared.
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Yes, for me the problem isn't so much the pomposity - hard to disapprove of rioters without sounding pompous - or the ineffectuality - a common failing in the face of rioting - but that he seemed so equivocal about rioting until it was poor white people doing it.
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
The objection to blocking Twitter is not its technical complexity or the symbolism of stricter political censorship than Russia, but kicking off a trade dispute with the incoming President of the United States.
I don't think it would be much of a trade dispute if the UK decided to block Twitter. Various countries do.
The biggest question would be - why not Telegram and all the others hosting similar (or worse) content?
The naughty people are and have been on Telegram for a long time. Things like its groups functionality are very useful for organising among bad people.
One other story before I go back to work: it seems that Trump's former lawyer Jenna Ellis is taking a plea deal and cooperating with the prosecution in the Arizona fake electors case. If Trump loses in November... he's going to be in a world of hurt.
On the Q from the previous thread, the infra to block twitter would be exactly the same as the infra used to block anything else, such as child abuse images.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
The objection to blocking Twitter is not its technical complexity or the symbolism of stricter political censorship than Russia, but kicking off a trade dispute with the incoming President of the United States.
I don't think it would be much of a trade dispute if the UK decided to block Twitter. Various countries do.
The biggest question would be - why not Telegram and all the others hosting similar (or worse) content?
The naughty people are and have been on Telegram for a long time.
Yes - notice how the scum trying to organise riots were promoting and using it?
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Dave had similar levels during the 2011 riots but his ratings improved as time went by as more and more thugs got locked up.
Only 30% say Cameron has done a good job, against 44% who say the opposite, a net negative score of -14. For Johnson, the figures are 28% good job and 38% bad, a negative of -10 points. By contrast, 45% think that the acting commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Tim Godwin, has done well against 27% who say the opposite – a positive score of 18.
Another online poll, conducted this week by YouGov, found similar levels of support for the police response over that of politicians
Without reading/absorbing/analyzing details regarding Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, my immediate take is that it vindicates the view, that while geography is a traditional AND contemporary consideration re: VP selection, in practice REGIONAL appeal trumps (ahem) STATE electoral vote chasing.
Appears coming out of the gate, that IF Kamala Harris is gonna need help anywhere in general, it's gonna be the Midwest. KH + TW is likely to aid her, to a limited degree anyway. IN ADDITION to national considerations.
And now, a musical interlude for your listening pleasure . . .
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
Self-ID.
America is top based on medal count because that's how they ID the table.
We are under Australia because that's how we ID the table.
Either the Tories or Reform need to take the lead in GE voting intention in the coming polls, as Hauge's Tories did during the fuel protests early in Blair's tenure. If they don't, then it will mean the public regard the Right as equally culpable, which won't do them much good politically.
They won’t
Starmer may be a dork but he is a lucky dork. The right is grievously divided. He won’t lose his poll lead
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Dave had similar levels during the 2011 riots but his ratings improved as time went by as more and more thugs got locked up.
Only 30% say Cameron has done a good job, against 44% who say the opposite, a net negative score of -14. For Johnson, the figures are 28% good job and 38% bad, a negative of -10 points. By contrast, 45% think that the acting commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Tim Godwin, has done well against 27% who say the opposite – a positive score of 18.
Another online poll, conducted this week by YouGov, found similar levels of support for the police response over that of politicians
Interesting. I’d say the difference here is the “two tier” accusation, which makes this a potentially more dangerous political moment
The initial reaction to the 2011 riots was spectacularly feeble, I certainly remember that
I’ve been doing some research on those riots so I could write a thread on the 2024 riots and it is similar, out of touch politicians on holiday get lambasted but as soon as the judges start locking up the thugs the ratings went up, I think we’ll see similar with Starmer.
This is the medals table from the Microsoft Start webpage:
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
Doesn't that look like something like a 3, 2, 1 or 3, 1, 1 points system?
The criteria is to avoid the USA's self-regard balloon going pop.
Either of those schemes would have put the UK above Australia. You need at least a 8-1 ratio of Gold to Bronze points to get Australia above the UK.
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Actually I think you have missed a greater risk from the riots, if Farage or the tabloids run with it. The riots themselves will blow out soon. What might stick around is the perception of Starmer jailing rioters while letting out rapists and murderers (which also fits the two tier Keir nickname you have raised).
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
How many people voted in the recent election based on partygate or PPE fast lanes. Precious few. He has plenty of time to turn it around.
Getting reports on my local Facebook of a proposed demo in a town nearby and lots of hospitality businesses not opening as a consequence. Disgraceful. Especially on a gorgeous day like today. People damaging businesses in their own community. Shocking.
Walz has two great advantages as a politician: He is not a lawyer -- and he is a winning football coach. (Most Americans dislike lawyers -- and love winning coaches, especially football coaches.) "After returning, Walz took a job teaching and coaching in Alliance, Nebraska, where he met his wife, Gwen Whipple, a fellow teacher.[11] He and Gwen married in 1994, and moved two years later to Mankato in Minnesota, his wife's home state,[11] where he worked as a geography teacher and coach at Mankato West High School.[10] He coached the football team to its first state championship in 1999." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz
And, then there is this: "Walz was ranked the 7th-most bipartisan House member during the 114th Congress (and the most bipartisan member from Minnesota) in the Bipartisan Index created by The Lugar Center and the McCourt School of Public Policy, which ranks members of Congress by measuring how often their bills attract co-sponsors from the opposite party and how often they co-sponsor bills by members of the opposite party."
Good comment. Neither part of the "liberal elitist" tag is going to stick.
Early signs are that the Trump campaign is already flailing around, trying to find an effective attack.
Walz has two great advantages as a politician: He is not a lawyer -- and he is a winning football coach. (Most Americans dislike lawyers -- and love winning coaches, especially football coaches.) "After returning, Walz took a job teaching and coaching in Alliance, Nebraska, where he met his wife, Gwen Whipple, a fellow teacher.[11] He and Gwen married in 1994, and moved two years later to Mankato in Minnesota, his wife's home state,[11] where he worked as a geography teacher and coach at Mankato West High School.[10] He coached the football team to its first state championship in 1999." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz
And, then there is this: "Walz was ranked the 7th-most bipartisan House member during the 114th Congress (and the most bipartisan member from Minnesota) in the Bipartisan Index created by The Lugar Center and the McCourt School of Public Policy, which ranks members of Congress by measuring how often their bills attract co-sponsors from the opposite party and how often they co-sponsor bills by members of the opposite party."
Good comment. Neither part of the "liberal elitist" tag is going to stick.
Early signs are that the Trump campaign is already flailing around, trying to find an effective attack.
But that’s also true of Kamala Harris as well. They don’t seem to have a clue how to,attack her.
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Dave had similar levels during the 2011 riots but his ratings improved as time went by as more and more thugs got locked up.
Only 30% say Cameron has done a good job, against 44% who say the opposite, a net negative score of -14. For Johnson, the figures are 28% good job and 38% bad, a negative of -10 points. By contrast, 45% think that the acting commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Tim Godwin, has done well against 27% who say the opposite – a positive score of 18.
Another online poll, conducted this week by YouGov, found similar levels of support for the police response over that of politicians
Interesting. I’d say the difference here is the “two tier” accusation, which makes this a potentially more dangerous political moment
The initial reaction to the 2011 riots was spectacularly feeble, I certainly remember that
I’ve been doing some research on those riots so I could write a thread on the 2024 riots and it is similar, out of touch politicians on holiday get lambasted but as soon as the judges start locking up the thugs the ratings went up, I think we’ll see similar with Starmer.
It all depends on whether starmer is getting dissed because of the “two tier/hypocrisy” accusations OR because of the mere fact the riots are taking place and he’s in charge. If it is the latter then you are surely right, his polling will recover as the bloody assizes transport everyone
Low stakes conspiracy theory: Elon Musk is trying to provoke Starmer into nationalising Twitter as the only way to get back the $40 billion he paid for it.
Yes but the next general election is four or five years away. Things that ought to matter, often don't.
Indeed
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
Dave had similar levels during the 2011 riots but his ratings improved as time went by as more and more thugs got locked up.
Only 30% say Cameron has done a good job, against 44% who say the opposite, a net negative score of -14. For Johnson, the figures are 28% good job and 38% bad, a negative of -10 points. By contrast, 45% think that the acting commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Tim Godwin, has done well against 27% who say the opposite – a positive score of 18.
Another online poll, conducted this week by YouGov, found similar levels of support for the police response over that of politicians
Low stakes conspiracy theory: Elon Musk is trying to provoke Starmer into nationalising Twitter as the only way to get back the $40 billion he paid for it.
Except that falls down on *how* he nationalises it.
Mind you, Starmer could just rock up and say "$40 billion, cash"
Comments
Watch the EC numbers like a hawk. Both for swing states and the possibility of states becoming swing states. The later is quite unlikely at the moment, but worth checking.
https://x.com/jjabbott/status/1820808291083026854?t=rI9nU3w5xLR0dWUgH2SgkQ&s=19
TLDR he’s like Ed Davey if Ed Davey had been in the Territorial Army
It's like saying Aston Villa have a great record of seven wins in the FA Cup, they should be one of the favourites this season!*
*Spoiler, the last win was 1957.
The Minnesota governor, a former high school teacher and National Guard member, brings to the ticket Midwestern appeal and a plain-spoken way of talking about Donald Trump.
FFS. Don't encourage Musk!
https://x.com/Tim_Walz/status/1819737187832709552?t=nrTAox_icT3Ir77qTyLMZQ&s=19
Still think he is an out of touch liberal @HYUFD?
EDIT: Ninja'd
Walz is also an old style labor union leftist Democrat not a centrist who could win independents in a key swing state like Shapiro.
Harris likely gets a bounce post convention but in the end I think Trump wins by about the same margin Bush defeated Kerry by in 2004
https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/no-toss-up/electoral-college
4.5 on pubs is great value.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2004/oct/22/kerry-hunts-for-birds-votes/
In US politics, you can be quite a way from the hard left and be a Union Man. Joe Six Pack is a Union Man.
Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
I am proud to announce that I've asked @Tim_Walz
to be my running mate.
As a governor, a coach, a teacher, and a veteran, he's delivered for working families like his.
It's great to have him on the team.
Now let’s get to work. Join us:
https://x.com/KamalaHarris/status/1820828396298879294
But it's now a proper contest again.
Walz is a permitting reform champion:
Last year, Minnesota passed a law mandating 100% clean electricity by 2040.
But due to red tape, they were projected to miss the target by decades.
So they passed permitting reform, which will cut overall project approval time by 50%.
https://x.com/AlecStapp/status/1820819272727232658
Can anyone explain how the sorting works? It clearly isn't on Golds, or China would be first... but it clearly isn't on total medal count, or the UK would be ahead of Australia.
It is quite captivating, although it would be much enhanced by a sharkpool at the foot of the wall.
Speaking of names, the Kamala/Walz ticket now has two names with unclear pronunciations. From that video, Walz is pronounced Walls, like ice cream and sausages.
“Britons tend to think that Keir Starmer is handling the riots badly
Well: 31%
Badly: 49%”
yougov.co.uk/politics/artic…
https://x.com/yougov/status/1820830612829208905?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw
This is quite a big one to fail
A few more like that and I could become a vegetarian.
It's been in place for 15-20 years. There was a day in ~2008 iirc where they blocked Wikipedia by mistake.
It won't be 100% - nothing ever is, but it will be 98%+, surmountable by some internet tricks and established routes used by privacy activists.
So I think it is based on Gold but it may be a timing issue.
The criteria is to avoid the USA's self-regard balloon going pop.
As it stands, Harris polls slightly ahead on simple votes.
The more I think of the Walz choice, the better it looks. The teacher/union stuff shores up the left - which gets the activists/get out the vote people onboard (a lot of the Democrat party volunteers/low level people are on the Left). Plus he can reach out to Independents - long term National Guard, family man, ran his state well.
EDIT: and, of course, as a Governor, no problems over a Senate seat.
Tragically, @DavidL (among others) can probably confirm that images of utter horror are widespread.
However isn’t it a political truism that perceptions are crucially formed in the first 100 days of office? And after that they become hard to shift
Starmer has been given a seriously tough test on his second month of office. I don’t envy him. However he came in with baggage that is entirely his own fault - taking the knee AFTER the BLM riots
The British public believe he is making a hash of this major crisis. Pompous but ineffective, hypocritical and bloviating?
He may find this perception hangs around
That said there are exceptions to the rule. Thatcher was massively unpopular at first but became more popular over time
"After returning, Walz took a job teaching and coaching in Alliance, Nebraska, where he met his wife, Gwen Whipple, a fellow teacher.[11] He and Gwen married in 1994, and moved two years later to Mankato in Minnesota, his wife's home state,[11] where he worked as a geography teacher and coach at Mankato West High School.[10] He coached the football team to its first state championship in 1999."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz
And, then there is this: "Walz was ranked the 7th-most bipartisan House member during the 114th Congress (and the most bipartisan member from Minnesota) in the Bipartisan Index created by The Lugar Center and the McCourt School of Public Policy, which ranks members of Congress by measuring how often their bills attract co-sponsors from the opposite party and how often they co-sponsor bills by members of the opposite party."
Only 30% say Cameron has done a good job, against 44% who say the opposite, a net negative score of -14. For Johnson, the figures are 28% good job and 38% bad, a negative of -10 points. By contrast, 45% think that the acting commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Tim Godwin, has done well against 27% who say the opposite – a positive score of 18.
Another online poll, conducted this week by YouGov, found similar levels of support for the police response over that of politicians
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/aug/12/riot-poll-public-back-police
The biggest question would be - why not Telegram and all the others hosting similar (or worse) content?
The initial reaction to the 2011 riots was spectacularly feeble, I certainly remember that
Appears coming out of the gate, that IF Kamala Harris is gonna need help anywhere in general, it's gonna be the Midwest. KH + TW is likely to aid her, to a limited degree anyway. IN ADDITION to national considerations.
And now, a musical interlude for your listening pleasure . . .
Minnesota Waltz - Nod Landstrich And His Polka Waltz Orchestra 1950
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiL-j3bDnvo
America is top based on medal count because that's how they ID the table.
We are under Australia because that's how we ID the table.
Starmer may be a dork but he is a lucky dork. The right is grievously divided. He won’t lose his poll lead
Tory councillor resigns over anti-Muslim remarks as 400 arrested for riots
The Conservatives have now suspended Susan Scott.
https://x.com/REWearmouth/status/1820839276130496803
Getting reports on my local Facebook of a proposed demo in a town nearby and lots of hospitality businesses not opening as a consequence. Disgraceful. Especially on a gorgeous day like today. People damaging businesses in their own community. Shocking.
Neither part of the "liberal elitist" tag is going to stick.
Early signs are that the Trump campaign is already flailing around, trying to find an effective attack.
https://www.businessinsider.com/tim-walz-kamala-harris-israel-gaza-pro-palestinian-protests-2024-8
Any details on this? And any mea culpa from the Beeb?
Was it Lee Anderson who came up with it? Damn the man!
Mind you, Starmer could just rock up and say "$40 billion, cash"