New poll has big majority for rejoin – politicalbetting.com
This latest poll from Omnius is in line with other recent polls that we have seen when voters are asked whether they would vote to rejoin the EU if given the opportunity.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.
Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
One thing that doesn’t seem to get understood is how many European politicians see free movement etc.
In many cases, they see it as - they gave up national subsidies, national preferences in contracts, in the labour market etc.
They sacrificed together for the common polity.
Which is why they can’t accept being half in. It’s a bit like a diet club. Everyone is *in*. Or not
Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Surely if you die and dead is actually dead then you can’t discover that as you are dead and actually dead. Do agree with you by the way, just being a tit.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Please outline the "scale of economic damage" caused by Brexit and separate it from 1. Covid and 2. the war
It is almost impossible. Right now it is emotionally satisfying - especially to Remainers - to blame ALL our ills, from sewage to migration - on Brexit. Just as we eurosceptics used to blame all our ills - equally mendaciously - on the EU. Fair's fair
Will it ever tempt Labour or Cons to take the huge generational risk of a refeendum on Rejoin? No, esp when the EU will impose huge costs on us - like the euro, Schenghen, etc. And even then we will do it at the risk of a veto from those parasitic fuckers in Ireland, or Anglophobic France, or Belgium in a bad mood, or Malta just for some leverage coz they lose English language advantage
File under: absolutely never going to happen, which means, it ain't gonna happen within the next 20 years, barring some humongous black swan
38% for stay out of the EU is still 14% higher than the 24% for the Tories on the headline Ominisis voting intention poll so zero chance of the Tories abandoning Brexit.
Under FPTP little chance of Starmer doing so either given he needs the strongly Leave redwall swing seats to go back to Labour so he has a chance of becoming PM.
The LDs might consider it as would the SNP but they only have influence in a hung parliament. In short if Labour win the next general election with a majority at most they will consider tighter alignment to EU regulations and the Customs Union in a first term, with maybe rejoining the EEA and single market if they are re elected and win a second term. I can only see Labour even considering rejoining the full EU after a 3rd consecutive general election victory and even then only if the membership terms are largely as we had at the time of the 2016 referendum
I see on the previous thread that HY is taking comfort from the fact that the Tories are unlikely to fall behind the SNP or LibDems in seats won at the next election.
I've heard of setting a low bar, but that is six foot under.
I think that this government had to recruit a 100,000 extra civil servants just to make sure that we had trade arrangements that were only a little bit worse than the ones we had before we left says it all.
Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
So - Brexit without the Brexit?
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
How is it an "unmitigated disaster"? This is just theology. It is ludicrous
I get that you hate Brexit. That's fine. But you need to remain factual
Remoaners are so fucking religious. Any deviation from the doctrine is heresy. This is not how you conduct politics
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
So - Brexit without the Brexit?
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
I see on the previous thread that HY is taking comfort from the fact that the Tories are unlikely to fall behind the SNP or LibDems in seats won at the next election.
I've heard of setting a low bar, but that is six foot under.
In Canada in 1993 the governing Canadian Tories ended up on just 2 seats and only the 5th largest party, so it could be worse
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.
Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?
Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
So - Brexit without the Brexit?
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
Hah. I was close. I mentioned the Azores in my short list and it is clearly too sunny and warm to be Ireland, hence why I said a western remote coast of the Canaries
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
Ah but we get top drawer banging tunes. At least when it’s me or @ydoethur playing.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
But still ahead of a long list of people they’d ring before they tried Truss’s number?
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
I agree. As others on here have intimated, I suspect there will be a gradual, creeping alignment with the EU involving agreed standards, arrangements for freedom of movement and customs Union, and lots of agreed areas of joint working, but no euro and no full membership. It will improve on our current situation, we will as a compromise be rule followers and not rule makers, but this will be seen as preferable to full fat membership with full political alignment and the euro. But to get there I suspect 10-15 years. Maybe 20.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
I quite like a Sunday morning in Church, though I haven't been for some time. I like hymns where you can give it some welly.
Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.
Up for that. But 'Boris' would burn longer and better.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.
Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?
Not judging just interested.
That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
Ah but we get top drawer banging tunes. At least when it’s me or @ydoethur playing.
Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
So - Brexit without the Brexit?
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
No, it’s code for “if we try what failed, but do it harder, it will work this time”.
Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.
Up for that. But 'Boris' would burn longer and better.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.
Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?
Not judging just interested.
That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.
Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?
Not judging just interested.
That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
That's the trouble with religion. If there was just one of them it'd be a 50/50 call but with so many to choose from the probability of it being true and you picking the right one must be pretty low.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
So - Brexit without the Brexit?
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
No, it’s code for “if we try what failed, but do it harder, it will work this time”.
Personally, I Blame Canada.
You'll have to let me in on what we've actually tried, because I'm struggling. We tried an independent vaccine programme I suppose - that worked pretty well, but the blob reasserted itself and now it's up the swanny.
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK. It's an extraordinary situation and a betrayal of voters on both sides.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
Is he really that bothered? Will he not just pop off to the US once hes no longer PM?
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.
Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?
Not judging just interested.
That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
That's the trouble with religion. If there was just one of them it'd be a 50/50 call but with so many to choose from the probability of it being true and you picking the right one must be pretty low.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
As others on here have intimated, I suspect there will be a gradual, creeping alignment with the EU involving agreed standards, arrangements for freedom of movement and customs Union, and lots of agreed areas of joint working
So the primary outcome of Brexit will be "ever closer union"...
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
What's your take on the ECHR?
Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
You'd be a shoo in. They don't want people with expertise in extinguishing fires in the other place!
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
Ah but we get top drawer banging tunes. At least when it’s me or @ydoethur playing.
Toccata and Fugue in D minor ? :-)
To be honest I’m rubbish at Bach but yes, I can and do play that because people love it so much…
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.
Labour's job is to make our relationship with the EU such that rejoin is simplified, but that also means making our relationship outwith the EU somewhat simplified.
Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)
Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
What's your take on the ECHR?
Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
Why didn't we leave in 2020? How can this be a true Brexit if we're still under the ECHR?
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
Hah. I was close. I mentioned the Azores in my short list and it is clearly too sunny and warm to be Ireland, hence why I said a western remote coast of the Canaries
As others on here have intimated, I suspect there will be a gradual, creeping alignment with the EU involving agreed standards, arrangements for freedom of movement and customs Union, and lots of agreed areas of joint working
So the primary outcome of Brexit will be "ever closer union"...
Awesome.
Sadly, we will never get back the deal we had before. Shakespeare could have written a great tragedy/comedy about Brexit.
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.
...
Perhaps the 190th time you've posted this cartoon. Maybe I'm an old curmudgeon (spoiler: I am) but I don't feel it gains from endless repetition. But you do you
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.
...
I had hoped 'pertaining to the UK' would be enough signal that I didn't mean 'being a ruletaker' regarding the terms of trade with the EU, which is a separate issue. I think most had the nouse to get it.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
Labour's job is to make our relationship with the EU such that rejoin is simplified, but that also means making our relationship outwith the EU somewhat simplified.
Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)
Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).
Yes I agree on this. But B means will will never rejoin
Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
So - Brexit without the Brexit?
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
No, it’s code for “if we try what failed, but do it harder, it will work this time”.
Personally, I Blame Canada.
You'll have to let me in on what we've actually tried, because I'm struggling. We tried an independent vaccine programme I suppose - that worked pretty well, but the blob reasserted itself and now it's up the swanny.
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK. It's an extraordinary situation and a betrayal of voters on both sides.
That is exactly what the Leave campaign promised. They said we’d remain part of a large free trade zone, and that could only have happened by us being rule takers.
Of course, they couldn’t even deliver that, so now we’re rule takers without the free trade zone.
The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
It doesn't work like that.
How do you know?
Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.
Nah, nailed on. Just a matter of time, geography is destiny.
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.
...
Exactly. Not sure where @Luckyguy1983 was during the campaign but that was brought up endlessly by remainers as the likely outcome.
I do think that the poll shows that 62% of the population think the Conservative Party made a huge mistake. Are those 62% lost forever, or at least for a long time, to the Tories? If so, can the Tories win another general election?
The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.
She will age. They all do
At some point Brexity Britain will see a new photo of the EU on Instagram and will think "OMG why were we so in love with THAT?"
Of course, we will be whiskery old fucks by then, but it will happen
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
What's your take on the ECHR?
Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
The smoother option is to copy & paste it into UK law, and then have parliament amend it as & when.
Would limit the international outcry to just the usual suspects, rather than serious objectors.
The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.
Nah, nailed on. Just a matter of time, geography is destiny.
In the era of AI, this is such a bizarre statement
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.
...
Perhaps the 190th time you've posted this cartoon. Maybe I'm an old curmudgeon (spoiler: I am) but I don't feel it gains from endless repetition. But you do you
I don't know about the previous 189 times but it was very very pertinent to that post. Quick thinking by @Scott_P in my opinion.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
What's your take on the ECHR?
Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
Human Rights are so 20th-century. What is the utility of people having rights?
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
It doesn't work like that.
How do you know?
Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
But if God's never talked to me or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
Labour's job is to make our relationship with the EU such that rejoin is simplified, but that also means making our relationship outwith the EU somewhat simplified.
Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)
Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).
Yes I agree on this. But B means will will never rejoin
Or perhaps would keep the EU a teency bit honest in a rejoin negotiation. Actually, even as a remainer who doesn't see malicious motivation in every EU act that takes a dollop of rose tinted optimism to write.
Lol, you motherfuckers! Brexit actually did this as well. 😮
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
What's your take on the ECHR?
Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
Human Rights are so 20th-century. What is the utility of people having rights?
The Realists will tell you that you need to compromise. Facts on the ground etc
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
It doesn't work like that.
How do you know?
Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
Are you the Pope in disguise, and if not who are you to say what's a heresy?
You're in for a nasty surprise when you pop your clogs, or rather you aren't.
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
What's your take on the ECHR?
Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
Human Rights are so 20th-century. What is the utility of people having rights?
Leon doesn't really understand the concept of "other people"
I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
If we accept change is constant, circumstances will change.
The process isn't just to rejoin - it's to seek negotiations to apply to join the EU. This will be the point at which we see what the EU's terms for having us back look like - will it be Euro and Schengen or something more nuanced?
We cannot go back to the status quo ante referendum - the half hearted nature of the membership facilitated the case for leaving. The only two coherent positions are all the way in or all the way out. The former implies Euro membership, Schengen and signing up to the whole federalist agenda.
To do that now is inconceivable - would it be so in 30 or 40 years time? I don't know - perhaps there is a parallel with the NHS here - it was voted in despite big opposition in 1945 but once the Conservatives accepted it, it stopped being a political issue until its limitations were exposed as the demographics changed some 50 years on.
Perhaps we'll see the same with the EU - it may be its limitations will justify us staying out or the limitations of us staying out will make a return if not liked then in the national interest.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
It doesn't work like that.
How do you know?
Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
But if God's never talked to me or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
Today marks the 1,032nd anniversary of the Battle of Maldon in 991 when Byrhtnoth and the Anglo-Saxons were defeated by the Vikings.
King Aethelred (he who wasn't ready) bought off the Vikings with a Danegeld of silver worth about £2 million.
Just a reminder English silver was the nearest thing to a common European currency at the time and we were still uing it to pay off the Danes until 1066.
You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
It doesn't work like that.
How do you know?
Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
But if God's never talked to me or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
Comments
The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.
If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.
Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
In many cases, they see it as - they gave up national subsidies, national preferences in contracts, in the labour market etc.
They sacrificed together for the common polity.
Which is why they can’t accept being half in. It’s a bit like a diet club. Everyone is *in*. Or not
That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
It is almost impossible. Right now it is emotionally satisfying - especially to Remainers - to blame ALL our ills, from sewage to migration - on Brexit. Just as we eurosceptics used to blame all our ills - equally mendaciously - on the EU. Fair's fair
Will it ever tempt Labour or Cons to take the huge generational risk of a refeendum on Rejoin? No, esp when the EU will impose huge costs on us - like the euro, Schenghen, etc. And even then we will do it at the risk of a veto from those parasitic fuckers in Ireland, or Anglophobic France, or Belgium in a bad mood, or Malta just for some leverage coz they lose English language advantage
File under: absolutely never going to happen, which means, it ain't gonna happen within the next 20 years, barring some humongous black swan
Faja Grande on Flores in the Azores.
Under FPTP little chance of Starmer doing so either given he needs the strongly Leave redwall swing seats to go back to Labour so he has a chance of becoming PM.
The LDs might consider it as would the SNP but they only have influence in a hung parliament. In short if Labour win the next general election with a majority at most they will consider tighter alignment to EU regulations and the Customs Union in a first term, with maybe rejoining the EEA and single market if they are re elected and win a second term. I can only see Labour even considering rejoining the full EU after a 3rd consecutive general election victory and even then only if the membership terms are largely as we had at the time of the 2016 referendum
I've heard of setting a low bar, but that is six foot under.
https://www.standard.co.uk/insider/middletons-family-business-collapse-party-pieces-james-kate-william-ella-b1098424.html
We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin
I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides
But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
I get that you hate Brexit. That's fine. But you need to remain factual
Remoaners are so fucking religious. Any deviation from the doctrine is heresy. This is not how you conduct politics
Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?
Not judging just interested.
@Miklosvar is a fule
Nice one. A good challenge. Is it fun? The Azores? I've often wondered
Personally, I Blame Canada.
I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK. It's an extraordinary situation and a betrayal of voters on both sides.
Awesome.
But I think that God's got a sick sense of humour
And when I die I expect to find him laughing
Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)
Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).
Whale and dolphin trips.
We are off to Pico in the next few days to visit the lava vineyards.
Of course, they couldn’t even deliver that, so now we’re rule takers without the free trade zone.
I do think that the poll shows that 62% of the population think the Conservative Party made a huge mistake. Are those 62% lost forever, or at least for a long time, to the Tories? If so, can the Tories win another general election?
At some point Brexity Britain will see a new photo of the EU on Instagram and will think "OMG why were we so in love with THAT?"
Of course, we will be whiskery old fucks by then, but it will happen
Would limit the international outcry to just the usual suspects, rather than serious objectors.
Who is to blame for allowing America to get to a point where the LGBT mob can mock the Bible with 0 consequences?
The Founding Fathers.
https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1690052790108729344
or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
Mind you, they did have some funky views on owning people…
Lol, you motherfuckers! Brexit actually did this as well. 😮
I need a bigger living room, as well
You're in for a nasty surprise when you pop your clogs, or rather you aren't.
The process isn't just to rejoin - it's to seek negotiations to apply to join the EU. This will be the point at which we see what the EU's terms for having us back look like - will it be Euro and Schengen or something more nuanced?
We cannot go back to the status quo ante referendum - the half hearted nature of the membership facilitated the case for leaving. The only two coherent positions are all the way in or all the way out. The former implies Euro membership, Schengen and signing up to the whole federalist agenda.
To do that now is inconceivable - would it be so in 30 or 40 years time? I don't know - perhaps there is a parallel with the NHS here - it was voted in despite big opposition in 1945 but once the Conservatives accepted it, it stopped being a political issue until its limitations were exposed as the demographics changed some 50 years on.
Perhaps we'll see the same with the EU - it may be its limitations will justify us staying out or the limitations of us staying out will make a return if not liked then in the national interest.
King Aethelred (he who wasn't ready) bought off the Vikings with a Danegeld of silver worth about £2 million.
Just a reminder English silver was the nearest thing to a common European currency at the time and we were still uing it to pay off the Danes until 1066.
God told me that. Personally.