Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

New poll has big majority for rejoin – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,216
edited August 2023 in General
imageNew poll has big majority for rejoin – politicalbetting.com

This latest poll from Omnius is in line with other recent polls that we have seen when voters are asked whether they would vote to rejoin the EU if given the opportunity.

Read the full story here

«134567

Comments

  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,910
    No to rejoin!
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,910

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855
    Basque country?
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855
    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.
  • tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,565
    15 years out will be enough - rejoin referendum 2031. Channelling the spirit of Rogerdamus.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769
    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,208
    Good to see that there is so much enthusiasm for Schengen the Single Currency.
  • VerulamiusVerulamius Posts: 1,550
    Miklosvar said:

    Basque country?

    No. Most westerly village in Europe
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    Good to see that there is so much enthusiasm for Schengen the Single Currency.

    Plus I suspect an extension of QMV.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.

    Are you suggesting he's a bit of a guy?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,708
    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    The EU have learnt nothing and forgotten nothing.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,769

    Miklosvar said:

    Basque country?

    No. Most westerly village in Europe
    That's Patreksfjörður in Iceland.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138
    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    One thing that doesn’t seem to get understood is how many European politicians see free movement etc.

    In many cases, they see it as - they gave up national subsidies, national preferences in contracts, in the labour market etc.

    They sacrificed together for the common polity.

    Which is why they can’t accept being half in. It’s a bit like a diet club. Everyone is *in*. Or not
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    ydoethur said:

    Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.

    Are you suggesting he's a bit of a guy?
    I’d say more marshmallow and baked spud.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    The EU have learnt nothing and forgotten nothing.
    That takes the biscuit.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,557
    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Surely if you die and dead is actually dead then you can’t discover that as you are dead and actually dead. Do agree with you by the way, just being a tit.
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855
    ydoethur said:

    Miklosvar said:

    Basque country?

    No. Most westerly village in Europe
    That's Patreksfjörður in Iceland.
    Patrick's fjord. I was right in substance.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,405

    Good to see that there is so much enthusiasm for Schengen the Single Currency.

    It goes with the Euro Freedom Of Movement zone.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856
    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    Please outline the "scale of economic damage" caused by Brexit and separate it from 1. Covid and 2. the war

    It is almost impossible. Right now it is emotionally satisfying - especially to Remainers - to blame ALL our ills, from sewage to migration - on Brexit. Just as we eurosceptics used to blame all our ills - equally mendaciously - on the EU. Fair's fair

    Will it ever tempt Labour or Cons to take the huge generational risk of a refeendum on Rejoin? No, esp when the EU will impose huge costs on us - like the euro, Schenghen, etc. And even then we will do it at the risk of a veto from those parasitic fuckers in Ireland, or Anglophobic France, or Belgium in a bad mood, or Malta just for some leverage coz they lose English language advantage

    File under: absolutely never going to happen, which means, it ain't gonna happen within the next 20 years, barring some humongous black swan
  • VerulamiusVerulamius Posts: 1,550
    Miklosvar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Miklosvar said:

    Basque country?

    No. Most westerly village in Europe
    That's Patreksfjörður in Iceland.
    Patrick's fjord. I was right in substance.
    No I was there last year.

    Faja Grande on Flores in the Azores.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,932
    edited August 2023
    38% for stay out of the EU is still 14% higher than the 24% for the Tories on the headline Ominisis voting intention poll so zero chance of the Tories abandoning Brexit.

    Under FPTP little chance of Starmer doing so either given he needs the strongly Leave redwall swing seats to go back to Labour so he has a chance of becoming PM.

    The LDs might consider it as would the SNP but they only have influence in a hung parliament. In short if Labour win the next general election with a majority at most they will consider tighter alignment to EU regulations and the Customs Union in a first term, with maybe rejoining the EEA and single market if they are re elected and win a second term. I can only see Labour even considering rejoining the full EU after a 3rd consecutive general election victory and even then only if the membership terms are largely as we had at the time of the 2016 referendum
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,208
    I see on the previous thread that HY is taking comfort from the fact that the Tories are unlikely to fall behind the SNP or LibDems in seats won at the next election.

    I've heard of setting a low bar, but that is six foot under.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    I think that this government had to recruit a 100,000 extra civil servants just to make sure that we had trade arrangements that were only a little bit worse than the ones we had before we left says it all.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,910
    edited August 2023
    Brexit has had a devastating affect on top drawer British businesses. Thoughts and prayers for these failed entrepreneurs and their creditors.

    https://www.standard.co.uk/insider/middletons-family-business-collapse-party-pieces-james-kate-william-ella-b1098424.html

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,932
    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    Miklosvar said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
    How is it an "unmitigated disaster"? This is just theology. It is ludicrous

    I get that you hate Brexit. That's fine. But you need to remain factual

    Remoaners are so fucking religious. Any deviation from the doctrine is heresy. This is not how you conduct politics
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,208

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138
    edited August 2023

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
    So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,932
    edited August 2023

    I see on the previous thread that HY is taking comfort from the fact that the Tories are unlikely to fall behind the SNP or LibDems in seats won at the next election.

    I've heard of setting a low bar, but that is six foot under.

    In Canada in 1993 the governing Canadian Tories ended up on just 2 seats and only the 5th largest party, so it could be worse
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856
    Miklosvar said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
    I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,557
    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.

    Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?

    Not judging just interested.
  • "He was deceived by a lie. We all were!"
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
    So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
    If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606

    Miklosvar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Miklosvar said:

    Basque country?

    No. Most westerly village in Europe
    That's Patreksfjörður in Iceland.
    Patrick's fjord. I was right in substance.
    No I was there last year.

    Faja Grande on Flores in the Azores.
    Hah. I was close. I mentioned the Azores in my short list and it is clearly too sunny and warm to be Ireland, hence why I said a western remote coast of the Canaries

    @Miklosvar is a fule

    Nice one. A good challenge. Is it fun? The Azores? I've often wondered
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,240

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
    Ah but we get top drawer banging tunes. At least when it’s me or @ydoethur playing.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    edited August 2023

    Miklosvar said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
    I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
    But still ahead of a long list of people they’d ring before they tried Truss’s number?
  • Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    I agree. As others on here have intimated, I suspect there will be a gradual, creeping alignment with the EU involving agreed standards, arrangements for freedom of movement and customs Union, and lots of agreed areas of joint working, but no euro and no full membership. It will improve on our current situation, we will as a compromise be rule followers and not rule makers, but this will be seen as preferable to full fat membership with full political alignment and the euro. But to get there I suspect 10-15 years. Maybe 20.
  • HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    Deluded as ever :lol:
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,910

    Miklosvar said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
    I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
    You mean like your girl Truss? I think not.
  • Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
    I quite like a Sunday morning in Church, though I haven't been for some time. I like hymns where you can give it some welly.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,673

    Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.

    Up for that. But 'Boris' would burn longer and better.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,208
    boulay said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.

    Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?

    Not judging just interested.
    That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
    Ah but we get top drawer banging tunes. At least when it’s me or @ydoethur playing.
    Toccata and Fugue in D minor ? :-)
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
    So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
    If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
    No, it’s code for “if we try what failed, but do it harder, it will work this time”.

    Personally, I Blame Canada.
  • kinabalu said:

    Yes to rejoin. And once it’s happened let’s commemorate the anniversary every year with fireworks and ritual burning of effigies of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool and Stoke on Trent.

    Up for that. But 'Boris' would burn longer and better.
    Too far
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,771
    On a betting site it must be right to discuss Pascal's wager
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,805

    boulay said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.

    Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?

    Not judging just interested.
    That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UbqZ_oN5do
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,899

    boulay said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.

    Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?

    Not judging just interested.
    That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
    That's the trouble with religion. If there was just one of them it'd be a 50/50 call but with so many to choose from the probability of it being true and you picking the right one must be pretty low.
  • HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
    So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
    If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
    No, it’s code for “if we try what failed, but do it harder, it will work this time”.

    Personally, I Blame Canada.
    You'll have to let me in on what we've actually tried, because I'm struggling. We tried an independent vaccine programme I suppose - that worked pretty well, but the blob reasserted itself and now it's up the swanny.

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK. It's an extraordinary situation and a betrayal of voters on both sides.
  • Miklosvar said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    Yes, I was joking. But Sunak is too smart not to see Brexit for the unmitigated disaster it is.
    I hear a lot about Sunak's intelligence, so I suppose it must be true - he strikes me as rather stupid. Happily, his thoughts on Brexit or anything else in British politics will soon be confined to occasional television appearances when they can't get one of the A or B list former PMs.
    Is he really that bothered? Will he not just pop off to the US once hes no longer PM?
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,405

    boulay said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    Is it better to be a religious person spending their life constrained by a set of ancient rules and it turn out that there is no god, or worse you chose the wrong one so are in serious shit with the real one.

    Or being an atheist and trying to blag it with whichever god is real on the basis you didn’t pick a side?

    Not judging just interested.
    That would be funny. All the Christians rocking up to be met by Zeus or Thor or Ra or Krishna and being told to do one.
    That's the trouble with religion. If there was just one of them it'd be a 50/50 call but with so many to choose from the probability of it being true and you picking the right one must be pretty low.
    If you were doing it at random, yes. But we don't
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,405

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,100

    As others on here have intimated, I suspect there will be a gradual, creeping alignment with the EU involving agreed standards, arrangements for freedom of movement and customs Union, and lots of agreed areas of joint working

    So the primary outcome of Brexit will be "ever closer union"...

    Awesome.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606

    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
    Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,208

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    You'd be a shoo in. They don't want people with expertise in extinguishing fires in the other place!
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855
    Casting down my golden crown upon the glassy sea has always sounded like something that would pall after 10 minutes.
  • HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    I don't want to start any blasphemous rumours
    But I think that God's got a sick sense of humour
    And when I die I expect to find him laughing
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,240

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Tripe. And a weak analogy. A Christian dying and entering oblivion doesn't 'discover' anything; they're no worse off than an atheist.
    All those Sunday mornings in church while the rest of us are having a lie in, and perhaps something else, sounds like being worse off to me.
    Ah but we get top drawer banging tunes. At least when it’s me or @ydoethur playing.
    Toccata and Fugue in D minor ? :-)
    To be honest I’m rubbish at Bach but yes, I can and do play that because people love it so much…
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,910

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    Brexit without Brexit suits me just fine. Everyone bis happy!
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,100

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.

    ...
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,352
    Labour's job is to make our relationship with the EU such that rejoin is simplified, but that also means making our relationship outwith the EU somewhat simplified.

    Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)

    Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).

  • Leon said:

    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
    Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
    Why didn't we leave in 2020? How can this be a true Brexit if we're still under the ECHR?
  • viewcode said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
    How do you know?
  • VerulamiusVerulamius Posts: 1,550
    Leon said:

    Miklosvar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Miklosvar said:

    Basque country?

    No. Most westerly village in Europe
    That's Patreksfjörður in Iceland.
    Patrick's fjord. I was right in substance.
    No I was there last year.

    Faja Grande on Flores in the Azores.
    Hah. I was close. I mentioned the Azores in my short list and it is clearly too sunny and warm to be Ireland, hence why I said a western remote coast of the Canaries

    @Miklosvar is a fule

    Nice one. A good challenge. Is it fun? The Azores? I've often wondered
    Lovely. Very remote hardly any Brits. We went Canyoning which is brilliant and a rib boat ride over to Corvo to walk around in the caldera.

    Whale and dolphin trips.

    We are off to Pico in the next few days to visit the lava vineyards.
  • Scott_xP said:

    As others on here have intimated, I suspect there will be a gradual, creeping alignment with the EU involving agreed standards, arrangements for freedom of movement and customs Union, and lots of agreed areas of joint working

    So the primary outcome of Brexit will be "ever closer union"...

    Awesome.
    Sadly, we will never get back the deal we had before. Shakespeare could have written a great tragedy/comedy about Brexit.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    Scott_xP said:

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.

    ...
    Perhaps the 190th time you've posted this cartoon. Maybe I'm an old curmudgeon (spoiler: I am) but I don't feel it gains from endless repetition. But you do you
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,856
    Scott_xP said:

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.

    ...
    I had hoped 'pertaining to the UK' would be enough signal that I didn't mean 'being a ruletaker' regarding the terms of trade with the EU, which is a separate issue. I think most had the nouse to get it.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138
    A

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    Ole Pete wasn’t a forgiving type.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    Pro_Rata said:

    Labour's job is to make our relationship with the EU such that rejoin is simplified, but that also means making our relationship outwith the EU somewhat simplified.

    Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)

    Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).

    Yes I agree on this. But B means will will never rejoin
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,487

    No to rejoin!

    Let's make Brexit work. FoM and a single market please.
    So - Brexit without the Brexit?

    That is the one position I can’t understand. Except as rejoin without the rejoin, I suppose.
    I'd like to try Brexit with the Brexit first. There isn't a single campaigner, for Leave or Remain, who argued that a Leave victory meant staying within the purview of EU law because the CS doesn’t want us to leave. Yet that's what happened.
    So, continue the beatings until morale improves?
    If that's a code phrase for a sensible Government that's prepared to govern in the interests of the British people using the powers that it's been given, yes.
    No, it’s code for “if we try what failed, but do it harder, it will work this time”.

    Personally, I Blame Canada.
    You'll have to let me in on what we've actually tried, because I'm struggling. We tried an independent vaccine programme I suppose - that worked pretty well, but the blob reasserted itself and now it's up the swanny.

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK. It's an extraordinary situation and a betrayal of voters on both sides.
    That is exactly what the Leave campaign promised. They said we’d remain part of a large free trade zone, and that could only have happened by us being rule takers.

    Of course, they couldn’t even deliver that, so now we’re rule takers without the free trade zone.
  • Alphabet_SoupAlphabet_Soup Posts: 3,319
    The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,405

    viewcode said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
    How do you know?
    Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,140

    The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.

    Nah, nailed on. Just a matter of time, geography is destiny.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,945
    Scott_xP said:

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.

    ...
    Exactly. Not sure where @Luckyguy1983 was during the campaign but that was brought up endlessly by remainers as the likely outcome.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,487
    I don’t think we’ll be rejoining soon.

    I do think that the poll shows that 62% of the population think the Conservative Party made a huge mistake. Are those 62% lost forever, or at least for a long time, to the Tories? If so, can the Tories win another general election?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606

    The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.

    She will age. They all do

    At some point Brexity Britain will see a new photo of the EU on Instagram and will think "OMG why were we so in love with THAT?"

    Of course, we will be whiskery old fucks by then, but it will happen
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 4,858
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
    Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
    The smoother option is to copy & paste it into UK law, and then have parliament amend it as & when.

    Would limit the international outcry to just the usual suspects, rather than serious objectors.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    Foxy said:

    The desire to rejoin the EU is like pining after a lost girlfriend. She got married and left the country and she isn't coming back. Should have treated her better the first time.

    Nah, nailed on. Just a matter of time, geography is destiny.
    In the era of AI, this is such a bizarre statement
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,228
    LOL

    Who is to blame for allowing America to get to a point where the LGBT mob can mock the Bible with 0 consequences?

    The Founding Fathers.
    https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1690052790108729344
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,945
    Leon said:

    Scott_xP said:

    I repeat, nobody on any side of the Brexit debate envisaged a situation where we left the EU and remained beholden to its laws and regulations pertaining to the UK.

    ...
    Perhaps the 190th time you've posted this cartoon. Maybe I'm an old curmudgeon (spoiler: I am) but I don't feel it gains from endless repetition. But you do you
    I don't know about the previous 189 times but it was very very pertinent to that post. Quick thinking by @Scott_P in my opinion.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,779
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
    Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
    Human Rights are so 20th-century. What is the utility of people having rights?
  • twistedfirestopper3twistedfirestopper3 Posts: 2,452
    edited August 2023
    .
    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
    How do you know?
    Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
    But if God's never talked to me
    or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138
    Nigelb said:

    LOL

    Who is to blame for allowing America to get to a point where the LGBT mob can mock the Bible with 0 consequences?

    The Founding Fathers.
    https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1690052790108729344

    They did have some funky view on religion.

    Mind you, they did have some funky views on owning people…
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,352
    Leon said:

    Pro_Rata said:

    Labour's job is to make our relationship with the EU such that rejoin is simplified, but that also means making our relationship outwith the EU somewhat simplified.

    Some groundwork I hope the Labour party lays is a referendums act which builds in how future referenda should work. Basically, anything that requires a negotiation should include (a) a proper negotiating brief on which the change option in the first referendum lays and (b) a second referendum on the ultimate negotiation by the original referendees wherever that can be given effect. Never again the likes of a Brexit referendum that lacked (a) and that ultimately would have been allowed (b) (though that wasn't clear at the outset)

    Sindyref too. 2014 met (a) but wouldn't have had (b). Sindyref II would have to have a confirmatory (b).

    Yes I agree on this. But B means will will never rejoin
    Or perhaps would keep the EU a teency bit honest in a rejoin negotiation. Actually, even as a remainer who doesn't see malicious motivation in every EU act that takes a dollop of rose tinted optimism to write.

    Lol, you motherfuckers! Brexit actually did this as well. 😮
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138
    edited August 2023
    Chris said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
    Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
    Human Rights are so 20th-century. What is the utility of people having rights?
    The Realists will tell you that you need to compromise. Facts on the ground etc

    I need a bigger living room, as well

    image
  • MiklosvarMiklosvar Posts: 1,855
    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
    How do you know?
    Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
    Are you the Pope in disguise, and if not who are you to say what's a heresy?

    You're in for a nasty surprise when you pop your clogs, or rather you aren't.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,405
    Chris said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    What's your take on the ECHR?
    Leave today. It is a ridiculous wartime hangover, of near-zero utility
    Human Rights are so 20th-century. What is the utility of people having rights?
    Leon doesn't really understand the concept of "other people"
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,990
    Leon said:

    fitalass said:

    ydoethur said:

    I disagree with the last paragraph. I think Brussels would have us back in a heartbeat. Britain leaving the EU was a significant blow to their beloved project, while an admission of failure and crawling back would be a fillip second to none.

    The snag is, they would set innumerable terms they would think are very reasonable, because they simply don't get how people feel about a United Europe, which would be absolute anathema to a sizeable chunk of wistful rejoiners.

    If people want the status quo ante that's understandable given the catastrophe Johnson wished on us by signing the EU's punishment terms instead of the rather better ones negotiated by May, but that's not likely to be on offer.

    Not short of some fairly radical changes in the EU, anyway.

    Absolutely agree. Its one thing to tick the yes box in a polling survey about rejoining the EU, but is quite another doing it in the ballot box if there was another referendum asking the question if the EU membership deal is not at least what we had before.
    Aaaand it will never be what we had before. The EU - quite rightly, from their perspective - will demand immediate euro membership, so they know we are in it for the long haul and won't get outy again. Once you are in the euro your fate is sealed

    We will never accept the euro. Will will never rejoin

    I predict there will be a fudge on Free Movement within a new peripheral Single Market, once passions have died (and they are dying). The economic benefits are too great for both sides

    But it needs a generation of politicians to die off
    If we accept change is constant, circumstances will change.

    The process isn't just to rejoin - it's to seek negotiations to apply to join the EU. This will be the point at which we see what the EU's terms for having us back look like - will it be Euro and Schengen or something more nuanced?

    We cannot go back to the status quo ante referendum - the half hearted nature of the membership facilitated the case for leaving. The only two coherent positions are all the way in or all the way out. The former implies Euro membership, Schengen and signing up to the whole federalist agenda.

    To do that now is inconceivable - would it be so in 30 or 40 years time? I don't know - perhaps there is a parallel with the NHS here - it was voted in despite big opposition in 1945 but once the Conservatives accepted it, it stopped being a political issue until its limitations were exposed as the demographics changed some 50 years on.

    Perhaps we'll see the same with the EU - it may be its limitations will justify us staying out or the limitations of us staying out will make a return if not liked then in the national interest.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,405

    .

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
    How do you know?
    Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
    But if God's never talked to me or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
    [facepalm]

  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,990
    Today marks the 1,032nd anniversary of the Battle of Maldon in 991 when Byrhtnoth and the Anglo-Saxons were defeated by the Vikings.

    King Aethelred (he who wasn't ready) bought off the Vikings with a Danegeld of silver worth about £2 million.

    Just a reminder English silver was the nearest thing to a common European currency at the time and we were still uing it to pay off the Danes until 1066.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,138
    viewcode said:

    .

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    HYUFD said:

    Miklosvar said:

    You cannot still be a firm believer, it's like being a Christian and dying and discovering that dead is actually dead, no harps or angels or hellfire. Conclusive refutation.

    Or an atheist discovering they end up at the Pearly Gates in front of St Peter
    What a result that would be. Spend my whole life not giving a toss about religion, bemused by true believers . Pop my clogs then still get into heaven.
    It doesn't work like that.
    How do you know?
    Good works are not enough (that's the Pelagian heresy), one must also believe in God. There is no route into Heaven other than by that belief. Atheists have no belief and so cannot enter.
    But if God's never talked to me or shown me the light, then it's his fault that I don't believe so he'll have to tell old St Pete to give me the nod. I can't lose.
    [facepalm]

    It just means he’s a heretic, poor fellow.

    God told me that. Personally.
This discussion has been closed.