With 98% of the votes counted the Dems looks set to gain both Georgia US Senate seats – politicalbet
Comments
-
And those who compare Boris to Trump are ridiculoussolarflare said:Every time I think our politics is bad it's comforting to know we're nowhere on the batshit spectrum compared to the USA.
Trump is scary and where this ends goodness knows
Sky have stopped coverage of his rantings and as far as I know the BBC did not show it1 -
The 50k cases wasn't wrong since it was also "if we don't take any action". Action was taken.FrancisUrquhart said:
Also it wasn't mocked for 200 deaths, it was the 3000 daily deaths slide...which was later removed as they accepted it was incorrect...the error bars were nonsense, as they played fast and loose taking an earlier model and presented it as prediction starting from the next day, which meant it had these huge error bars (as it was based on a model that had spat out the prediction weeks before, and was wrong).Philip_Thompson said:
The early slide was the 50k recorded cases a day by mid November, which was also wrong.
Fucking fake news media.2 -
Blimey actually volunteering to wrap yourself round @kinabalu's little finger.MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
Funny to see.0 -
The point was about the god thing.contrarian said:
He really didn'tping said:
“Does that still matter in this country?”AramintaMoonbeamQC said:
He’s hit the nail on the head there.
Trumpism is a kind of post-religious cult.
The American system has given to their citizens, by common consent even on here, an electoral system that to be called third world is a massive insult to the third world.
The courts in almost every case would not let Trump even set out the weak evidence he did have.
Why would Americans have any confidence in any of their institutions now?
The decline in religiousity in the US was a necessary prerequisite for the success of trumpism. Discuss.1 -
Trumspksys are a family of grifters. The move from one con to the next, burning turf as they go then finding new turf to trash. Their "interests" are milking the suckers and living on the proceeds ad infinitum.kle4 said:
It's nice that the Trump children all seem so close with their father that they stump for him politically, but do they not have their own lives and interests? The one benefit to him not being president should be they no longer have to get involved in politics - it's not like they did much before.HYUFD said:
Anyone who ever watched the US version of "The Apprentice" could see for themselves what a total wastes of space is young Don.
Indeed, only reason why folks thought Ivanka might NOT be a total schmuck (wrong!) was because in sheer brains she was so clearly light-years superior to her dad and sibling.
Like the wise man (not Rudi) once said, "In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is king."2 -
Given the current president of Mexico held a fake inauguration when he lost years ago I will be amazed if Trump does not do one.Big_G_NorthWales said:Trump is utterly barking and very dangerous as he winds up his supporters live on TV
This is frankly disgusting and does make you 'weep' for the people of the US1 -
Yes - just the majority won't be from covid. (Not conspiracy, just that lots of people die every die NOT from Covid).rkrkrk said:I'm thinking we are likely to go over 2,000 deaths/day this month. Others agree?
0 -
Calling senators’weak republicans’ isn’t going to win hearts and minds.
0 -
They liked to pose with their trophy big game kills....kle4 said:
It's nice that the Trump children all seem so close with their father that they stump for him politically, but do they not have their own lives and interests? The one benefit to him not being president should be they no longer have to get involved in politics - it's not like they did much before.HYUFD said:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/04/donald-trump-jr-trophy-hunting-auction-nevada-aoe0 -
@Shadsy is trying to take 7-2 on him for the nomination ;pkinabalu said:
I think it will depend on his differential numbers cf Kamala and his health. If it looks like he has the better chance AND he's fit, I would expect him to run. He could be someone who is prepared to voluntarily relinquish great power but it would be unusual. His odds will be interesting when the WH24 market forms.SirNorfolkPassmore said:
I genuinely think he might if he has quite good numbers and midterms, is enjoying life, and feels okay in himself. I think he's 80-90% in himself that he's run his last race, but I don't think he's totally closed it off.kle4 said:
I so want Biden to run again in 2024. Everyone, including probably him, are so certain he will be a one term president, that it will just be comedic for him to say, you know what, I think I'm doing a good job, I've got just as many marbles as I did in 2020, primary me if you want a go now.TheScreamingEagles said:
I think we might need to start making allowances for the fact that a huge number of Trumpers/GOPers will be dead by 2024 as they view Covid-19 as hoax, engage in super spreader events and decline the vaccine.AramintaMoonbeamQC said:Trump super spreader event playing 'In The Air Tonight'. It certainly is.
Even bigger Dem landslide in 2024 as Biden wins in places like Texas.0 -
Actually the best thing that could be done with the Donald is just let him play golf in Scotland. I did wonder slightly when his intention of a flight to Scotland might have him requesting diplomatic asylum on arrival.Carnyx said:
I guess Sturgeon is both flattered and pissed off with his actions.0 -
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/876894066478329857kle4 said:
Sunil holds a patent on misleading bar charts. As a result hes the 5th richest man in the UK.MarqueeMark said:
Did you subcontract that chart out to the LibDems?Sunil_Prasannan said:
https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/1327601642880053250contrarian said:
What's important, surely, is that vast numbers of Republicans believe him, according to polls, and think they do not have a legitimate government.kle4 said:
He really has no idea how anything works, does he?williamglenn said:The reason there were ballots is that there was an election.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1346818855298072576?s=21
Just like the democrats four years ago, in fact.
And that is America now.-1 -
The way things are at the moment West Bromwich West are the better footy side in the West Bromwich area.Sunil_Prasannan said:
Green Street Green Road!SeaShantyIrish2 said:
IF England can have West Bromwich West, then surely America can have West West Virginia!rcs1000 said:
(Shouldn't it be North East Dakota and North West Dakota... and ditto for the South)not_on_fire said:
Stand by for the great states of East and West DakotaMalmesbury said:
{Texas has entered the chat}kle4 said:
Split themselves into more states. The sky is the limit, or rather how small the stars will be in the flagTheScreamingEagles said:I was trying to compile this stat earlier.
https://twitter.com/imillhiser/status/1346834407626334209
(Are you paying attention, TSE???)0 -
Just history...TOPPING said:
Blimey actually volunteering to wrap yourself round @kinabalu's little finger.MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
Funny to see.0 -
Boxing themselves into a corner. They can't not start shooting between now and the 20th now without admitting to being completely irrelevant, on their own terms, to the security of a free State.williamglenn said:Party like it's 1789.
https://twitter.com/EggerDC/status/13468481475538698240 -
Not to mention the Ridings, a concept the US might usefully borrow if it becomes necessary to divide up the flyover States some more.SeaShantyIrish2 said:
IF England can have West Bromwich West, then surely America can have West West Virginia!rcs1000 said:
(Shouldn't it be North East Dakota and North West Dakota... and ditto for the South)not_on_fire said:
Stand by for the great states of East and West DakotaMalmesbury said:
{Texas has entered the chat}kle4 said:
Split themselves into more states. The sky is the limit, or rather how small the stars will be in the flagTheScreamingEagles said:I was trying to compile this stat earlier.
https://twitter.com/imillhiser/status/1346834407626334209
(Are you paying attention, TSE???)0 -
The press is the ‘enemy of the people’. Good grief. Out and out fascism.0
-
Trump has arrived at the rally. Says “We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
Disruption of Inauguration open the cards?0 -
Trump howling at the moon3
-
I used to think the stories of fears of him not going were pure crap .... now ... not so sureOldKingCole said:Trumphas arrived at the rall . Says “We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
Disruption of Inauguration open the cards?0 -
All fine. But just to be clear. My list is not of posters who would have voted for Trump. The entry qualification to get on it was preferring him to win the election (or Biden to lose it).MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
So, telly on, morning of 4/11, what was the hope, whether spoken or unspoken? - this was the question I asked myself of each and every active poster on here, all 300 and odd of them. Took me quite some time as you can imagine. Several hours.
Just a bit of fun though.0 -
Problem is, Trump is enjoying himself too much.
v dangerous.1 -
Currently -turbotubbs said:
Yes - just the majority won't be from covid. (Not conspiracy, just that lots of people die every die NOT from Covid).rkrkrk said:I'm thinking we are likely to go over 2,000 deaths/day this month. Others agree?
0 -
Yep. He's demanding that the crowd storm the capital. Okay, "walk over". he knows what will happen.0
-
Trump's reaction to losing the election is a bit like some pro-Europeans reaction to losing the 2016 Referendum.
If he'd put as much effort into actually winning the election as he has put into overturning it then he might have actually won the election in the first place.2 -
At what point will he be arrested if at allFF43 said:Problem is, Trump is enjoying himself too much.
v dangerous.
This is truly bizarre3 -
Playing for low stakes, then.OldKingCole said:Quote from Giuliani at the Trumps rally:
"I'm willing to stake my reputation on the fact that there is election fraud:"2 -
No need to guess. Just full on pissed off. Just think what it would do to the Scottish Gmt budget for policing.Omnium said:
Actually the best thing that could be done with the Donald is just let him play golf in Scotland. I did wonder slightly when his intention of a flight to Scotland might have him requesting diplomatic asylum on arrival.Carnyx said:
I guess Sturgeon is both flattered and pissed off with his actions.
Also Boris Johnson's reputation if he gives Mr T asylum. Or Mr Raab C. Brexit's. At a time when they will be desperate to build up the Speshul Relashunship with Mr Biden.
Edit: and allowing Mr T to do what he does in Scotland would be as bad as eye tests in Barnard Castle in terms of undermining the fight against the new variant pox.0 -
This is actually an excellent point.Philip_Thompson said:Trump's reaction to losing the election is a bit like some pro-Europeans reaction to losing the 2016 Referendum.
If he'd put as much effort into actually winning the election as he has put into overturning it then he might have actually won the election in the first place.2 -
What is certain is that we will exceed the total civilian death toll of all wars in the 20th century, which is around 80,000.rkrkrk said:I'm thinking we are likely to go over 2,000 deaths/day this month. Others agree?
This national trauma will take many years to overcome, not least because unlike the major wars of the last century, the UK is going to be one of the main losers in both deaths and economic damage.0 -
Not really given Evangelicals voted in droves for Trumpping said:
The point was about the god thing.contrarian said:
He really didn'tping said:
“Does that still matter in this country?”AramintaMoonbeamQC said:
He’s hit the nail on the head there.
Trumpism is a kind of post-religious cult.
The American system has given to their citizens, by common consent even on here, an electoral system that to be called third world is a massive insult to the third world.
The courts in almost every case would not let Trump even set out the weak evidence he did have.
Why would Americans have any confidence in any of their institutions now?
The decline in religiousity in the US was a necessary prerequisite for the success of trumpism. Discuss.0 -
I was no fan of the 17-19 parliament but that's a bit of a stretch.Philip_Thompson said:Trump's reaction to losing the election is a bit like some pro-Europeans reaction to losing the 2016 Referendum.
3 -
As I said, the gullibility of people - as regards how hard this was to do - is disappointing.Philip_Thompson said:
May had the wrong red line. Boris fixed it.kinabalu said:
Exactly. He dropped her red lines and agreed a much easier deal to do. A piece of cake deal in fact. Then sold it as an against-the-odds triumph of hardball and negotiating panache. Pulled this trick twice. In 2019 with the WA. Last month with the FTA. The first won him an election and the power to do the 2nd. The gullibility of people is disappointing but, still, you have to say - what a player.Scott_xP said:
May's priority was no distinction between England and GB, despite the fact that Stormont exists.
Boris's priority was for GB to be free from Europe - and that Stormont must control whether NI continues under its arrangements.
If it was so "easy" to negotiate Stormont being able to unilaterally end NI's special arrangements then why didn't May negotiate that? Throughout May's tenure the EU were explicit there must never be a unilateral end to the backstop as a backstop with a way out is not a backstop in their eyes. That changed when Boris negotiated with them.
But on one point you are quite right. Johnson's Brexit is more faithful to pure Leave.0 -
New thread peeps0
-
He didn't like my bar chartJonathan said:The press is the ‘enemy of the people’. Good grief. Out and out fascism.
0 -
It's the way he tends to stride up and down slowly and carefully, with his black leather gloves while saying this sort of thing, that conveys that sense of menace to the most ardent section of his supporters.Jonathan said:The press is the ‘enemy of the people’. Good grief. Out and out fascism.
1 -
This thread has been de-certified.0
-
CNN - Biden nominates Merrick Garland as AG0
-
Worse than Drakeford?Big_G_NorthWales said:
At what point will he be arrested if at allFF43 said:Problem is, Trump is enjoying himself too much.
v dangerous.
This is truly bizarre1 -
It's fascism alright. A warning not from history but from rolling news in the here and now.WhisperingOracle said:
It's the way he tends to stride up and down slowly and carefully, with his black leather gloves while saying this sort of thing, that conveys that sense of menace to the most ardent section of his supporters.Jonathan said:The press is the ‘enemy of the people’. Good grief. Out and out fascism.
0 -
I called the election for Biden on here at 12.01 am Wednesday. It was obvious the postals would taken him over the limit in the handful of states in play. (I did say that Trump would win Alaska, as he did by 10%, against those rather more excitable types who thought it was in play. Ditto Texas.)kinabalu said:
All fine. But just to be clear. My list is not of posters who would have voted for Trump. The entry qualification to get on it was preferring him to win the election (or Biden to lose it).MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
So, telly on, morning of 4/11, what was the hope, whether spoken or unspoken? - this was the question I asked myself of each and every active poster on here, all 300 and odd of them. Took me quite some time as you can imagine. Several hours.
Just a bit of fun though.
I just think he was a very weak candidate. He handled himself with grace as Trump threw an oh-so-predictable tantrum in the confectionary aisle, when the voters took away his sweeties. But Lord, is Biden uninspiring.1 -
Shithole country ... ?MarqueeMark said:
The sub-thrd world electoral system W-A-Y predates Trump. 2000 and hanging chads, anyone?Pulpstar said:
That's almost entirely Trump's work, he's salted the earth for the GOP.contrarian said:
I repeat: An exit poll from Georgia for CNN showed 75% of repubs think the Presidential election was stolen. Those are voters who turned up for the run=offs. Among those who stayed away it is probably higher.Jonathan said:This Trump March/rally is seriously fucked up. Sorry about language, but it’s appropriate. Never seen anything like it. 🥲America.
Many millions of Americans think they have an illegitimate government and a sub third world electoral system.
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/13468656749882327040 -
Ok, I'll take you off it.MarqueeMark said:
I called the election for Biden on here at 12.01 am Wednesday. It was obvious the postals would taken him over the limit in the handful of states in play. (I did say that Trump would win Alaska, as he did by 10%, against those rather more excitable types who thought it was in play. Ditto Texas.)kinabalu said:
All fine. But just to be clear. My list is not of posters who would have voted for Trump. The entry qualification to get on it was preferring him to win the election (or Biden to lose it).MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
So, telly on, morning of 4/11, what was the hope, whether spoken or unspoken? - this was the question I asked myself of each and every active poster on here, all 300 and odd of them. Took me quite some time as you can imagine. Several hours.
Just a bit of fun though.
I just think he was a very weak candidate. He handled himself with grace as Trump threw an oh-so-predictable tantrum in the confectionary aisle, when the voters took away his sweeties. But Lord, is Biden uninspiring.
But I need a replacement to maintain the Dirty Dozen logo.0 -
Biden was the safe-pair of hands, consensus candidate. It is why he was selected. It was why he won in the way he did.MarqueeMark said:
I called the election for Biden on here at 12.01 am Wednesday. It was obvious the postals would taken him over the limit in the handful of states in play. (I did say that Trump would win Alaska, as he did by 10%, against those rather more excitable types who thought it was in play. Ditto Texas.)kinabalu said:
All fine. But just to be clear. My list is not of posters who would have voted for Trump. The entry qualification to get on it was preferring him to win the election (or Biden to lose it).MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
So, telly on, morning of 4/11, what was the hope, whether spoken or unspoken? - this was the question I asked myself of each and every active poster on here, all 300 and odd of them. Took me quite some time as you can imagine. Several hours.
Just a bit of fun though.
I just think he was a very weak candidate. He handled himself with grace as Trump threw an oh-so-predictable tantrum in the confectionary aisle, when the voters took away his sweeties. But Lord, is Biden uninspiring.0 -
There were around 200 million civilian deaths in wars in the twentieth century.anothernick said:
What is certain is that we will exceed the total civilian death toll of all wars in the 20th century, which is around 80,000.rkrkrk said:I'm thinking we are likely to go over 2,000 deaths/day this month. Others agree?
This national trauma will take many years to overcome, not least because unlike the major wars of the last century, the UK is going to be one of the main losers in both deaths and economic damage.
Or did you mean just on the UK mainland?0 -
Yes UK civilian deaths.ydoethur said:
There were around 200 million civilian deaths in wars in the twentieth century.anothernick said:
What is certain is that we will exceed the total civilian death toll of all wars in the 20th century, which is around 80,000.rkrkrk said:I'm thinking we are likely to go over 2,000 deaths/day this month. Others agree?
This national trauma will take many years to overcome, not least because unlike the major wars of the last century, the UK is going to be one of the main losers in both deaths and economic damage.
Or did you mean just on the UK mainland?0 -
Not being Trump is one of the chief attributes of Biden.kinabalu said:
All fine. But just to be clear. My list is not of posters who would have voted for Trump. The entry qualification to get on it was preferring him to win the election (or Biden to lose it).MarqueeMark said:
I know I'm not on it, because I have consistently said on here since 2016 there's no way I could have voted for Trump.kinabalu said:
It's Sub Judice for obvious reasons. Although I can probably risk disclosing that you are one of those named. Can't see you suing.MrEd said:
Bet you are on the list @MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark said:
I'm betting it includes those so secret, they have continuously said they wouldn't have voted for Trump in 2016 or 2020.... But clearly, they didn't mean it.kinabalu said:
I have a list of PBers who were either overtly or secretly rooting for Trump to beat Biden.Benpointer said:
Not by a long chalk is @Philip_Thompson 'the most Trumpian poster in here'.Nigel_Foremain said:
You fibber, you are the most Trumpian poster on here. I guess you hope that saying you are anti-Trump makes you sound a little more human. Trump is a far right populist and so are you. If you were an American you would be wearing the hat and attending all his rallies and claiming the election was a fraud. You never have any real evidence for your stated views just right wing hunches, just like him. You are probably one of Donald Trump's love childrenPhilip_Thompson said:
Well I'm a right winger who thinks Ronald Reagan was America's best postwar POTUS but I find Trump revolting and am glad the Democrats won.contrarian said:
Wow, another leftist promising conservatives they still have a chance if only they select a candidate the left approves of.Alistair said:I see we are back with the "Trump who got 2 of the 3 lowest Republican votes shares this millennium" is wildly popular line of thinking.
I guess we can expect a great deal of this over the next two years.
Maybe right wingers finding Trump repellant should be taken seriously? Just an idea.
I disagree with what PT says but you need to look elsewhere for PB Trump supporters. It isn't hard.
There are 12 names on it. The Dirty Dozen.
Or either of his opponents.
Hillary was a terrible candidate. Dire.Thankfully the title of first woment President wasn't sullied by having her attached to that bit of history.
And "Not being Trump" wouldn't have been enough reason for me to vote for Biden.
So, telly on, morning of 4/11, what was the hope, whether spoken or unspoken? - this was the question I asked myself of each and every active poster on here, all 300 and odd of them. Took me quite some time as you can imagine. Several hours.
Just a bit of fun though.
He isn't JFK or Lincoln. He's just... normal, really. For an American politician.2 -
And it was in the context of the normal virus strain which, not one which is 50-70% more transmissive and has a base R value 0.7 higher.Philip_Thompson said:
The 50k cases wasn't wrong since it was also "if we don't take any action". Action was taken.FrancisUrquhart said:
Also it wasn't mocked for 200 deaths, it was the 3000 daily deaths slide...which was later removed as they accepted it was incorrect...the error bars were nonsense, as they played fast and loose taking an earlier model and presented it as prediction starting from the next day, which meant it had these huge error bars (as it was based on a model that had spat out the prediction weeks before, and was wrong).Philip_Thompson said:
The early slide was the 50k recorded cases a day by mid November, which was also wrong.
Fucking fake news media.1 -
England has its de facto parliament , Westminster.HYUFD said:
An English Parliament would be a help, so England is finally recognised as an equal partner within the UK alongside Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland which already have their own Parliaments and Assembly as well as still electing MPs to WestminsterTheScreamingEagles said:1