Deal – politicalbetting.com
Deal – politicalbetting.com
Final delicate details of the intricate Brexit Deal being carefully worked through, by the guy sacked for making stuff up as a journalist and the woman who didn't notice that 43.5% of her PhD thesis pages contained plagiarism.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The best since that Turkish conscript one.
I doff my cap to you.
Please note: when ordering sprouts from @Tesco
online, quantity 1 does not mean 1 bag of sprouts. It means 1 sprout. Thank you and good night
Flag Quote · Off Topic Like
Please note: when ordering sprouts from @Tesco
online, quantity 1 does not mean 1 bag of sprouts. It means 1 sprout. Thank you and good night
Remainers == Charlie Hawtrey.
Leavers == Sid James ?
Not paying billions in subscription fees? ✅
Outside of the Single Market ✅
Outside of the Customs Union ✅
Outside of the ECJ ✅
Able to diverge ✅
Laws set in Westminster ✅
Control of our waters ✅
Able to sign trade deals with the rest of the world ✅
Able to decide how to control migration ✅
I've probably missed things. What you consider worse red tape is what others wanted us to achieve to make things better.
"Everything in the world is dynamic and it doesn't stop. The EU is going to develop, the United Kingdom is going to develop... but the geography isn't going to change.
Is a reminder that voting Remain wasn't a vote for the status quo....the choice was out vs ever closer union.
https://twitter.com/Kent_Online/status/1342047174071377924
https://www.noradsanta.org/
One key distinction between Boris's deal and May's atrocious backstop is there are termination clauses within Boris's deal.
That means to one extent is actually matters much less if there is bad stuff buried in the deal - we can always face that down the road. If something becomes particularly irritating we can serve notice and quit the deal unilaterally, which wasn't possible with the backstop under international law.
This is part too of taking back control. We don't just elect a government, we then go back to the polls every five years at the max. Nothing therefore lasts for life - anything we dislike can be overturned no more than five years later. No Parliament can bind it's successors. That wasn't possible under the ratchet of the EU where once something was implemented (like Lisbon) Parliament had no real ability to turn back the clock.
On services whilst I have no doubt there will be a minor GDP growth hit in the short-medium term from not having these included I think this can also be overblown.
With equivalence for financial services, recognition of professional qualifications and short business visit visas we will be achieve the vast majority of what we want to do.
I wouldn't want to go any further. The political costs are too high and there are better markets elsewhere.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/23/lockdown-money-printing-sets-us-even-greater-covid-collapse/
A scary read this xmas eve.
There is a cost to 1 which most believe is higher.
Why would we diverge?
From personal experience I have benefited from ECJ when Westminster sat on its hands ( can detail if you wish) through incompetence.
8, deals negotiated on worse terms due to economy of scale.
Control of waters - big deal
Immigration - doubt it will have any impact on numbers but has restricted me and my children's freedom of movement.
It is, I know...
https://twitter.com/estellecostanza/status/1342044259743096832
https://youtu.be/zSZmlGa51W4
We would diverge because we chose to do so. Democratically.
Our Parliament subjected to our scrutiny at elections and our Courts subjected to our Parliament's scrutiny should be the ones to decide the law. Not the ECJ.
Restrictions on your ability to move are more theoretical than real. Most British expats go to non EU nations like Australia and Canada.
Just off out on last lot of Christmas Card rounds...
So it is sadly a bit too unbelievable to be truly amusing. If I were doing a parody like that I'd have had the shop people bring it up 'So what do you think about Boris, mate?' style, like an Albanian taxi driver story.
Still no deal.
Goes back to making brandy butter and mulled wine.
Impressive.
Anyway, peace and goodwill.
Except for those three. Fuck them."
So true.
Good entertaining header Alastair.
Only extremists think it is as simple as which way someone voted in 2016 alone.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9084435/Lets-leave-culture-war-time-writes-former-MEP-DANIEL-HANNAN.html
I hasten to add I did not vote for Corbyn, but advocated enough people do so to get a hung parliament that would enable a referendum. Fortunately there's no point voting Labour round here, so I didn't have to face that option.
Depending on the detail ...
The footballer and food poverty campaigner Marcus Rashford is to turn his focus to the social security safety net and will hold talks with the welfare secretary to discuss a £6bn-a-year boost to universal credit payments, the Guardian has learned.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/24/marcus-rashford-to-fight-for-permanent-rise-in-universal-credit
Only £6bn......
- Yes, let's deal.
[They do No Deal.]
https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1342100906192592896?s=20
https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1342104292241661952?s=20
It's always easier to give (or to freeze) something than to take it away once given.
https://twitter.com/IanDarke/status/1341904890914885641?s=20
https://metro.co.uk/2020/12/19/man-utd-preparing-new-contract-for-marcus-rashford-with-huge-pay-rise-13777255/