Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Things that nobody knows. What to watch out for in the coming

12467

Comments

  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,813
    edited October 2019
    BigRich said:

    Unlike Facebook, i didn't think that there where that many paid political adds on Twiter? may be wrong.
    Given twitter have no bloody idea who their users are, it seems like a terrible way of advertising anyway.

    Facebook on the other hand, know every left handed half Asian cat loving non-smokers in Bognor and will let you advertise directly to them.
  • AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,644
    viewcode said:

    nunu2 said:

    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    ydoethur said:

    That’s disappointing but not terribly surprising.
    We need barnsien to put that into his model
    My model gives these results for NE Somerset

    Model/Poll

    Con 49/44
    LD 24/28
    Lab 14/14
    BXP 8/7
    Grn 3/3
    So you’re currently spot on for lab, tbp and green but underestimating LD
    Yes - but in Cambridge, my model was over estimating the LDs compared to the poll and underestimating the Green - so not a consistent pattern.

    Based on this NE Somerset poll, I'm not adjusting my weights or assumptions. It looks reasonably good.

    Doing this modelling for every constituency gives

    Con 314
    Lab 220
    LD 45

    This will change as new national polls come in and as I tune it as constituency polls come in.
    If those are the numbers on results day.....ffs this will never end! Please dont let it be.
    Con minority government on those numbers, and the Deal will be in before Jan 31st.
    How does a Con minority government get this Deal through without an amendment forcing a confirmatory referendum?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    I once had a teacher who refused to accept that Northants was in the East Midlands and insisted we omit it from our sketch maps of the region.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,497

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Is Northampton South-East?
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749

    rcs1000 said:

    Can anyone explain the logic of this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/liberal-democrats-face-being-frozen-out-of-live-tv-debates-general-election

    Surely Swinson being frozen out of the debates massively favours Corbyn? If the voters polarise between Corbyn and Johnson that could result in a 2017-style result.

    It does.
    So why would Boris's team be in favour of this? Surely Boris should want to have a 7-way debate like Cameron dominated in 2015?
    Dominated it. He was marginalised as Nogi of the North won massive victory.

    Meanwhile CCHQ think Corbyn is their secret weapon.

    Dear God Thomo. Corbyn is a socialist didn’t you know. And this is 2019
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,607
    Good news.

    FB wont follow.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
    It’s not even the smallest county. That’s the Isle of Wight - at low tide.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    3-4
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Is Northampton South-East?
    East Midlands, officially.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,644

    rcs1000 said:

    Can anyone explain the logic of this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/liberal-democrats-face-being-frozen-out-of-live-tv-debates-general-election

    Surely Swinson being frozen out of the debates massively favours Corbyn? If the voters polarise between Corbyn and Johnson that could result in a 2017-style result.

    It does.
    So why would Boris's team be in favour of this? Surely Boris should want to have a 7-way debate like Cameron dominated in 2015?
    Boris thinks he can out-debate Corbyn but is scared of Swinson?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437
    I’m in a right muddle. I think I want to vote Lib Dem but my Labour MP is very pro-Remain and not exactly on the far left of the party. Tough.
  • viewcode said:

    nunu2 said:

    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    ydoethur said:

    That’s disappointing but not terribly surprising.
    We need barnsien to put that into his model
    My model gives these results for NE Somerset

    Model/Poll

    Con 49/44
    LD 24/28
    Lab 14/14
    BXP 8/7
    Grn 3/3
    So you’re currently spot on for lab, tbp and green but underestimating LD
    Yes - but in Cambridge, my model was over estimating the LDs compared to the poll and underestimating the Green - so not a consistent pattern.

    Based on this NE Somerset poll, I'm not adjusting my weights or assumptions. It looks reasonably good.

    Doing this modelling for every constituency gives

    Con 314
    Lab 220
    LD 45

    This will change as new national polls come in and as I tune it as constituency polls come in.
    If those are the numbers on results day.....ffs this will never end! Please dont let it be.
    Con minority government on those numbers, and the Deal will be in before Jan 31st.
    How does a Con minority government get this Deal through without an amendment forcing a confirmatory referendum?
    We are going to have many scenarios before this is over so who knows until 13th December provides the answers
  • How does this work? A political party or candidate can't advertise - presumably a partisan fake news site still can, though?
  • How does this work? A political party or candidate can't advertise - presumably a partisan fake news site still can, though?
    They can advertise in the US.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 95,994

    I’m in a right muddle. I think I want to vote Lib Dem but my Labour MP is very pro-Remain and not exactly on the far left of the party. Tough.

    And on the same reasoning many will stick with Labour. Corbyn's positioning will make very little difference.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,607
    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437

    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    You can thank Brexit for that. Nice one Leavers. 👍
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749

    egg said:

    This Workington Man stuff looks like another cringeworthy shot in the foot for the Tories.

    Haven’t we been here before though? 2017, all those Labour MPs up North in leave constituency’s, Brexit means brexit, crush the saboteurs and get the job done, and Tory focus in Labour heartlands.

    So what’s any different this time?

    I can think of one big difference. Surely the flaw in trying to reproduce Brexit and Trump win in 2016, or even do as well as May did in 2017 is there are less leavers and more remainers now? How could we forget Grabcocque and his St Gammons Day? My point being He didn’t invent it, was it not Prof Curtice or someone who had scientifically worked it all out.
    What’s St Gammon’s Day? I missed that but sounds, erm, interesting...
    It didn’t do for Grab, he done for himself revelling in the death of old folk.

    But one of the political scientists came up with it I’m sure. And my point is Boris has to do better than May with less leavers to play with.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    4-4
  • We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
  • 4 - 4
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,854

    I presume Roger only got half the story. I am going to guess the caveat was something like assuming the Tories do "this" badly in Scotland and in London, yadda yadda yadda, then in the remaining seats they will need this mega swing.

    I have just checked. What Gary Gibbon said is "The psephologists are coming out of the their labs and have been crawling over the numbers and what they are all saying is that for Boris Johnson to get a majority some of the numbers he's going to have to overturn in Labour seats are on a scale of the Blair landslide of 1997. An amazing thought.."
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,644

    viewcode said:

    nunu2 said:

    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    ydoethur said:

    That’s disappointing but not terribly surprising.
    We need barnsien to put that into his model
    My model gives these results for NE Somerset

    Model/Poll

    Con 49/44
    LD 24/28
    Lab 14/14
    BXP 8/7
    Grn 3/3
    So you’re currently spot on for lab, tbp and green but underestimating LD
    Yes - but in Cambridge, my model was over estimating the LDs compared to the poll and underestimating the Green - so not a consistent pattern.

    Based on this NE Somerset poll, I'm not adjusting my weights or assumptions. It looks reasonably good.

    Doing this modelling for every constituency gives

    Con 314
    Lab 220
    LD 45

    This will change as new national polls come in and as I tune it as constituency polls come in.
    If those are the numbers on results day.....ffs this will never end! Please dont let it be.
    Con minority government on those numbers, and the Deal will be in before Jan 31st.
    How does a Con minority government get this Deal through without an amendment forcing a confirmatory referendum?
    We are going to have many scenarios before this is over so who knows until 13th December provides the answers
    Fair point - it's all just speculation... for the next six weeks 😱
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,607
    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,497
    AndyJS said:

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Is Northampton South-East?
    East Midlands, officially.
    It’s definitely not Nottingham(ish). London is closer.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,679
    edited October 2019

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    MRP was spot on in 2017, I predicted a Tory majority of 40 earlier based on current poll averages.

    189 Labour MPs would be worse than Foot's 1983 trouncing for the party and the lowest Labour seat total since 1935
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    edited October 2019
    SF received a bequest in a will of £1.5 million from an Englishman who felt the British state conspired against him. He wanted to stick to fingers up at the establishment! The DUP might find they have a more potent enemy at this election as a consequence.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    HYUFD said:

    Worth remembering

    2015 - UKIP stood in 624 constituencies and polled 12.6% = Tory majority

    2017 - UKIP stood in 378 constituencies and polled 1.8% = Hung Parliament

    2015 - Modern liberal Cameron as Tory leader = Tory majority
    2017 - Vile authoritarian May as leader = Hung Parliament
    2019 - Modern liberal Boris as Tory leader = ???
    I still expect May to have got a higher voteshare than Boris or Cameron but Boris to get a majority as Cameron did in 2015
    In light of this post we should all pile on a Labour landslide.
    But you won't. Because *shock horror* HYUFD could be right....
    He might. I am however wondering where these seats will come from.

    I can see the Tories retaking Stroud, capturing Newcastle under Lyme and Bishop Auckland and picking up perhaps four seats in Wales - Delyn, Alyn and Deeside, Cardiff North and Bridgend - without making a huge effort. Other realistic targets include Bolsover, Canterbury, Eastbourne, Darlington, North Norfolk, Bedford, Westmoreland and Lonsdale, Barrow, Chester, Lincoln.

    But after that I am struggling to see where these gains will come from. And even those won’t offset likely losses in Scotland and the South East. For example, Kensington, for all it’s so marginal and represented by somebody who looks and behaves like a refugee from the Producers, is probably safe for Labour for now given today’s Grenfell report. Meanwhile surely nobody is expecting that idiot Goldsmith to hold Richmond Park.
    Labour's majority in Chester in 2017 was almost 10,000.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
    It’s not even the smallest county. That’s the Isle of Wight - at low tide.
    High tide surely.
  • After the events of 2017, can anyone really call this election?
  • BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,492

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437
    BigRich said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
    There’s 59 seats in Scotland. The SNP won 35 in 2017.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,679
    BigRich said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
    No, it is less than the 56 seats the SNP got in 2015 let alone all of the seats in Scotland
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    After the events of 2017, can anyone really call this election?

    No - Scotland has 59 seats. This is quite an old poll including fieldwork from September.
  • BigRich said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
    59 seats in Scotland.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,282
    If I was a soft Tory I might be tempted by the Liberal Democrats.

    I certainly wouldn’t by “I’m with Jo”, and her divisive identity politics.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,899

    How does this work? A political party or candidate can't advertise - presumably a partisan fake news site still can, though?
    As I understand it it's the content not the source that will determine whether it is allowed. I'm sure there will be problems with the ban, but it's great to see a social media company actually willing to say they will try to sort the issue out.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,813
    edited October 2019
    Roger said:

    I presume Roger only got half the story. I am going to guess the caveat was something like assuming the Tories do "this" badly in Scotland and in London, yadda yadda yadda, then in the remaining seats they will need this mega swing.

    I have just checked. What Gary Gibbon said is "The psephologists are coming out of the their labs and have been crawling over the numbers and what they are all saying is that for Boris Johnson to get a majority some of the numbers he's going to have to overturn in Labour seats are on a scale of the Blair landslide of 1997. An amazing thought.."
    So not what you said at all then. Some of the numbers in Labour seats. Not all. And that still sounds incorrect / incomplete. Think about it logically. It has to be predicated on Tories losing a load of seats elsewhere in the country.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,005
    AndyJS said:

    The leader of the SDP, William Clouston, has decided to stand in Leeds Central.

    https://twitter.com/WilliamClouston/status/1189625289208455168

    Hilary will be bricking himself.


    Not.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,607

    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
    It has become completely out of hand.

    We need new long, long sentences for these people.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
    It’s not even the smallest county. That’s the Isle of Wight - at low tide.
    The island is part of Hampshire.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437
    HYUFD said:

    BigRich said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
    No, it is less than the 56 seats the SNP got in 2015 let alone all of the seats in Scotland
    You getting the troops ready for the invasion?
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    How embarrassing. The Tory majority would be notionally 80-odd on these figures. That will teach me not to copy the Grauniad's figures verbatim!
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    MRP was spot on in 2017, I predicted a Tory majority of 40 earlier based on current poll averages.

    189 Labour MPs would be worse than Foot's 1983 trouncing for the party and the lowest Labour seat total since 1935
    But 364 Tory MPs actually implies a majority of 78! Old polling data though.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437
    rpjs said:

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
    It’s not even the smallest county. That’s the Isle of Wight - at low tide.
    The island is part of Hampshire.
    I don’t think it is anymore.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,007

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Is Northampton South-East?
    I think it's North of Hampton. I'm very sure it's North of Southampton. .. :)
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124
    Who does everyone want to see as a 'Portillo moment'?

    Niche choice in my case, but it's Darren Jones (Lab, Bristol NW). He used to work with Mrs Drutt and he's the most insufferable person either of us have ever met at work. We have about thirty years in law firms between us so this is a high bar.

    I can't find him longer than evens and the size of the BF exchange market won't buy a pint.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979

    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
    Another reason not to have an election when day light is in short supply IMO. I have a really bad feeling that someone is going to get attacked as the papers crank up division and hatred. It might not be an MP seeking re-election but a foot soldier who is taken unawares...
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,702
    Plenty of food for thought in the thread header; thanks AM.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,005

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Is Northampton South-East?
    Yes. Used to get 'Network South-East' trains. Same as Peterborough.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    I don't want to discount this without reason but they (Focaldata) don't look like a company who will be publishing their polling tables. I'd want to see one from a company I'd heard from (was it yougov doing this kind of thing last time?).
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,846

    rpjs said:

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
    It’s not even the smallest county. That’s the Isle of Wight - at low tide.
    The island is part of Hampshire.
    I don’t think it is anymore.
    Hasn’t been for some time (although there is recurrent talk of creating some sort of Solent partnership with Portsmouth and Southampton
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,282
    I wonder if the "we're all up for thwacking our MP with a baseball bat, if that's what it takes" opinion poll of last week has had a bearing on the decision of so many to stand down?
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    Drutt said:

    Who does everyone want to see as a 'Portillo moment'?

    Niche choice in my case, but it's Darren Jones (Lab, Bristol NW). He used to work with Mrs Drutt and he's the most insufferable person either of us have ever met at work. We have about thirty years in law firms between us so this is a high bar.

    I can't find him longer than evens and the size of the BF exchange market won't buy a pint.

    I think that Andrew Bridgen is one I would like to see defeated or Rees-Mogg. BJ would be the icing on the cake! :smiley:
  • AndyJS said:

    The leader of the SDP, William Clouston, has decided to stand in Leeds Central.

    https://twitter.com/WilliamClouston/status/1189625289208455168

    Hilary will be bricking himself.


    Not.
    Incredible to think they've stuck with the same logo for nearly 40 years.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,679
    edited October 2019

    HYUFD said:

    BigRich said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
    No, it is less than the 56 seats the SNP got in 2015 let alone all of the seats in Scotland
    You getting the troops ready for the invasion?
    If the SNP are doing worse than they did in 2015 even before Brexit, no need
  • Drutt said:

    Who does everyone want to see as a 'Portillo moment'?

    Niche choice in my case, but it's Darren Jones (Lab, Bristol NW). He used to work with Mrs Drutt and he's the most insufferable person either of us have ever met at work. We have about thirty years in law firms between us so this is a high bar.

    I can't find him longer than evens and the size of the BF exchange market won't buy a pint.

    Always good to see the loss of the thick and arrogant, so IDS.

    For the sake of the good people of Aberdeen South, Ross 'Handsy' Thomson.

    Swinson getting punted would be highly amusing.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,578

    Roger said:

    Swinson very impressive with Andrew Neil.

    Cleverly by contrast being skewered

    Roger said:

    Swinson very impressive with Andrew Neil.

    Cleverly by contrast being skewered

    Why dont you just come out and admit how biased your opinion us...
    You have to admit that Cleverly was struggling - actually gulping. He became incoherent. Swinson, in contrast, was relaxed yet focused. She has a good rapport with Neil. I don't think Neil respects Cleverly. Cleverly was saying things like:- you and I know that Labour would wreck the economy. He was appealing for support from Neil! Which he didn't get because Neil is a professional.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
  • We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
    Another reason not to have an election when day light is in short supply IMO. I have a really bad feeling that someone is going to get attacked as the papers crank up division and hatred. It might not be an MP seeking re-election but a foot soldier who is taken unawares...
    I do not think we should be intimidated though
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    A very divided constituency.
  • DruttDrutt Posts: 1,124
    The FT had a dataviz of 'toxic tweets' sent to MPs. Boris had so many more than everyone else they had to do the scale *logarithmically*
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    I wonder if the "we're all up for thwacking our MP with a baseball bat, if that's what it takes" opinion poll of last week has had a bearing on the decision of so many to stand down?

    That was proven to be fake news.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437
    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Oh give over. If Leavers had compromised we would have left by now.

    The Leave vote enabled the nasty BNP/EDL/UKIP undesirables to come out into the open and sensible people like you and @HYUFD are egging them on as footsoldiers in your culture war.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,846

    Drutt said:

    Who does everyone want to see as a 'Portillo moment'?

    Niche choice in my case, but it's Darren Jones (Lab, Bristol NW). He used to work with Mrs Drutt and he's the most insufferable person either of us have ever met at work. We have about thirty years in law firms between us so this is a high bar.

    I can't find him longer than evens and the size of the BF exchange market won't buy a pint.

    Always good to see the loss of the thick and arrogant, so IDS.

    For the sake of the good people of Aberdeen South, Ross 'Handsy' Thomson.

    Swinson getting punted would be highly amusing.
    IDS. JRM. Defeat the acronyms!
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Bollox
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749

    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
    Another reason not to have an election when day light is in short supply IMO. I have a really bad feeling that someone is going to get attacked as the papers crank up division and hatred. It might not be an MP seeking re-election but a foot soldier who is taken unawares...
    I do not think we should be intimidated though
    On the one hand winter elections in history got big turnouts, despite dark, winter, no excuse for snowflakes not to register a vote by post or on foot. On the other hand though historically “the season to be jolly” was probably more jolly and less stressy in run up to Christmas due to being not such a great consumerfest holiday time as it in in the present day. Truth is although there has been December election, the psychology of how it plays not tested in this modern era.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,679
    edited October 2019

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    How embarrassing. The Tory majority would be notionally 80-odd on these figures. That will teach me not to copy the Grauniad's figures verbatim!
    The report also has Tories 308, Labour 233 and LD 34 if 30% of Remain voters vote tactically and Tories 276, Labour 255 and LDs 44 if 40% of Remain voters vote tactically.

    So the Tories are ahead regardless but they need to keep Remainers tactical voting down for a majority and to secure Brexit (which should be easier in Tory v Labour seats given Corbyn than Tory v LD seats so I think the LDs will do a bit better than the headline suggests).
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Some people don't seem to be able to exercise self-control on social media, whereas in face to face situations they would never behave in the same way.
  • We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    Even on this site, female MPs tend to get completely disproportionate stick compared to male MPs. More abusive, less related to facts and policies and more repetitive. It is not just the real idiots with the death threats who need to calm down.
  • HYUFD said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    How embarrassing. The Tory majority would be notionally 80-odd on these figures. That will teach me not to copy the Grauniad's figures verbatim!
    The report also has Tories 308, Labour 233 and LD 34 if 30% of Remain voters vote tactically and Tories 276, Labour 255 and LDs 44 if 40% of Remain voters vote tactically.

    So the Tories are ahead regardless but they need to keep Remain tactical voting down for a majority and to secure Brexit (which should be easier in Tory v Labour seats given Corbyn than Tory v LD seats so I think the LDs will do a bit better than the headline suggests).
    Does it assume any Leave tactical voting, or not?
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749
    nichomar said:

    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Bollox
    More than that, this is a post as distasteful as anything a banned poster has posted ☹️
  • Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    I think you'll find Jo Cox was not a "remainer MP trying to overturn the vote".
  • We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    Even on this site, female MPs tend to get completely disproportionate stick compared to male MPs. More abusive, less related to facts and policies and more repetitive. It is not just the real idiots with the death threats who need to calm down.
    I didn't know Boris and Jezza were transitioning. The female political figure that seems to get most criticism on here is LauraK.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,679

    HYUFD said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    How embarrassing. The Tory majority would be notionally 80-odd on these figures. That will teach me not to copy the Grauniad's figures verbatim!
    The report also has Tories 308, Labour 233 and LD 34 if 30% of Remain voters vote tactically and Tories 276, Labour 255 and LDs 44 if 40% of Remain voters vote tactically.

    So the Tories are ahead regardless but they need to keep Remain tactical voting down for a majority and to secure Brexit (which should be easier in Tory v Labour seats given Corbyn than Tory v LD seats so I think the LDs will do a bit better than the headline suggests).
    Does it assume any Leave tactical voting, or not?
    It assumes no Leave tactical voting
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,519

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    Astonishing and horrible - I don't care what party she is, it's just disgusting.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,846
    edited October 2019

    I’m in a right muddle. I think I want to vote Lib Dem but my Labour MP is very pro-Remain and not exactly on the far left of the party. Tough.

    Question is how confident you are that he would go against the Labour Party whip if it comes to the crunch? Otherwise you are just voting for Corbyn (or whoever)
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Oh give over. If Leavers had compromised we would have left by now.

    The Leave vote enabled the nasty BNP/EDL/UKIP undesirables to come out into the open and sensible people like you and @HYUFD are egging them on as footsoldiers in your culture war.
    Give over.

    If I was an MP and I stood up and did my obvious best to overturn a democratic vote, then I would expect a violent reaction. I would expect death threats. I would anticipate the need for police protection.

    The whole point of democracy - votes, referendums, elections - is to take away the anger of war and strife, in the destiny of nations, and turn it into a legal process, with rules and limits, which allow for passionate disagreement but vent the wild anger in a safe way.

    The floor of the House of Commons is divided by sword lengths, from the era of duelling.

    If you then stand up and say democracy is cancelled, the votes of certain people mean nothing, and must be reversed, well then you are inviting the return of political violence. It is a basic rule of human history. Someone like Soubry has been courting disaster for three years. She needs to stop and see the danger: for all of us,
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited October 2019

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    That's a Tory majority of 78 not 44. (650 seats: Con 364, Others 286).
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,007
    spudgfsh said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    I don't want to discount this without reason but they (Focaldata) don't look like a company who will be publishing their polling tables. I'd want to see one from a company I'd heard from (was it yougov doing this kind of thing last time?).
    YouGov did MRP, as did Ashcroft. YouGov did well, Ashcroft did badly. Problem is, YouGov has had some personnel changes when Delta poll started up, so I don't know what they lost in the move. However I still await the YouGov MRP poll with great interest... :)
  • eggegg Posts: 1,749
    HYUFD said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    How embarrassing. The Tory majority would be notionally 80-odd on these figures. That will teach me not to copy the Grauniad's figures verbatim!
    The report also has Tories 308, Labour 233 and LD 34 if 30% of Remain voters vote tactically and Tories 276, Labour 255 and LDs 44 if 40% of Remain voters vote tactically.

    So the Tories are ahead regardless but they need to keep Remainers tactical voting down for a majority and to secure Brexit (which should be easier in Tory v Labour seats given Corbyn than Tory v LD seats so I think the LDs will do a bit better than the headline suggests).
    Do we know the remain tactical vote % 2017, was it as ridiculously as low as 40?
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,807
    justin124 said:

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    HYUFD said:

    Worth remembering

    2015 - UKIP stood in 624 constituencies and polled 12.6% = Tory majority

    2017 - UKIP stood in 378 constituencies and polled 1.8% = Hung Parliament

    2015 - Modern liberal Cameron as Tory leader = Tory majority
    2017 - Vile authoritarian May as leader = Hung Parliament
    2019 - Modern liberal Boris as Tory leader = ???
    I still expect May to have got a higher voteshare than Boris or Cameron but Boris to get a majority as Cameron did in 2015
    In light of this post we should all pile on a Labour landslide.
    But you won't. Because *shock horror* HYUFD could be right....
    He might. I am however wondering where these seats will come from.

    I can see the Tories retaking Stroud, capturing Newcastle under Lyme and Bishop Auckland and picking up perhaps four seats in Wales - Delyn, Alyn and Deeside, Cardiff North and Bridgend - without making a huge effort. Other realistic targets include Bolsover, Canterbury, Eastbourne, Darlington, North Norfolk, Bedford, Westmoreland and Lonsdale, Barrow, Chester, Lincoln.

    But after that I am struggling to see where these gains will come from. And even those won’t offset likely losses in Scotland and the South East. For example, Kensington, for all it’s so marginal and represented by somebody who looks and behaves like a refugee from the Producers, is probably safe for Labour for now given today’s Grenfell report. Meanwhile surely nobody is expecting that idiot Goldsmith to hold Richmond Park.
    Labour's majority in Chester in 2017 was almost 10,000.
    Agreed, no chance in Chester.

    There are quite a few other seats the Tories could win on a good day (and some that are have slimmer majorities than those listed). On a good day, mind:

    Crewe and Nantwich, Warwick and Leamington, Penistone and Stocksbridge, Colne Valley, Wakefield, Blackpool South, Dewsbury, Stockton South, Northfield, West Bromwich West, Bassetlaw, Keighley.

    It’s not beyond the realms of possibility for a good chunk of those to turn blue if the stars align.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,437
    IanB2 said:

    I’m in a right muddle. I think I want to vote Lib Dem but my Labour MP is very pro-Remain and not exactly on the far left of the party. Tough.

    Question is how confident you are that he would go against the Labour Party whip if it comes to the crunch? Otherwise you are just voting for Corbyn (or whoever)
    It’s a she - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_McKinnell

    That’s the problem - I don’t want my vote to be counted as pro Corbyn but I do want to remain in the EU.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 95,994
    edited October 2019
    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Oh give over. If Leavers had compromised we would have left by now.

    The Leave vote enabled the nasty BNP/EDL/UKIP undesirables to come out into the open and sensible people like you and @HYUFD are egging them on as footsoldiers in your culture war.
    Give over.

    If I was an MP and I stood up and did my obvious best to overturn a democratic vote, then I would expect a violent reaction. I would expect death threats. I would anticipate the need for police protection.

    The whole point of democracy - votes, referendums, elections - is to take away the anger of war and strife, in the destiny of nations, and turn it into a legal process, with rules and limits, which allow for passionate disagreement but vent the wild anger in a safe way.

    The floor of the House of Commons is divided by sword lengths, from the era of duelling.

    If you then stand up and say democracy is cancelled, the votes of certain people mean nothing, and must be reversed, well then you are inviting the return of political violence. It is a basic rule of human history. Someone like Soubry has been courting disaster for three years. She needs to stop and see the danger: for all of us,
    Despicable attempt to justify actual death threats. It's one hair's breadth from endorsing them.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979

    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
    Another reason not to have an election when day light is in short supply IMO. I have a really bad feeling that someone is going to get attacked as the papers crank up division and hatred. It might not be an MP seeking re-election but a foot soldier who is taken unawares...
    I do not think we should be intimidated though
    I would not door knock or deliver leaflets if I was paid for any party at the moment! :wink:

    On a similar subject:
    Daniel Finkelstein once said of the 1997 election that the Tories had elaborate plans to mobilise Tory voters but no one to do it! I do wonder if the Tories will suffer the same fate in this election. Some hot headed individuals get very worked up about Brexit but do nothing to get the Tories elected. Membership has declined if not collapsed where as Corbyn has Half a million potential members as foot soldiers! Just saying...
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    justin124 said:

    After the events of 2017, can anyone really call this election?

    No - Scotland has 59 seats. This is quite an old poll including fieldwork from September.
    I don't remember the YouGov MRP figures changing as much as the traditional polls during the 2017GE campaign. And I'm pretty sure the traditional polls were not as good for the Tories in September anyway.

    This poll should have anyone opposed to Johnson terrified.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,930

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    I’ll describe it as I like. Nowhere did I deny it was in Leicestershire. E.g. Long Eaton is in Derbyshire but still Nottingham(ish). For crying out loud man.
    Agreed. @YBarddCwsc is just being disobliging.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479
    High tide
  • Barnesian said:

    Roger said:

    Swinson very impressive with Andrew Neil.

    Cleverly by contrast being skewered

    Roger said:

    Swinson very impressive with Andrew Neil.

    Cleverly by contrast being skewered

    Why dont you just come out and admit how biased your opinion us...
    You have to admit that Cleverly was struggling - actually gulping. He became incoherent. Swinson, in contrast, was relaxed yet focused. She has a good rapport with Neil. I don't think Neil respects Cleverly. Cleverly was saying things like:- you and I know that Labour would wreck the economy. He was appealing for support from Neil! Which he didn't get because Neil is a professional.
    Absolutely. I am certainly not in Roger's camp and it was absolutely clear to me that Cleverly was being taken apart very professionally by Neil.

    The big issue is these were all obvious attack lines that any interviewer worth their salt is going to use against the party Chairman as we run into a campaign. And yet Cleverly seemed completely unprepared and relied just on soundbites and deflections. A very sub-standard performance. I hope the Tories start putting up some better spokespeople.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,813
    edited October 2019

    We need a Royal Commission or Speakers Conference into the potential destruction of representative democracy through the intimidation of MPs.

    We are courting disaster by allowing this to continue.

    MPs are quitting in fear.

    It is unacceptable and very worrying
    Another reason not to have an election when day light is in short supply IMO. I have a really bad feeling that someone is going to get attacked as the papers crank up division and hatred. It might not be an MP seeking re-election but a foot soldier who is taken unawares...
    I do not think we should be intimidated though
    I would not door knock or deliver leaflets if I was paid for any party at the moment! :wink:

    On a similar subject:
    Daniel Finkelstein once said of the 1997 election that the Tories had elaborate plans to mobilise Tory voters but no one to do it! I do wonder if the Tories will suffer the same fate in this election. Some hot headed individuals get very worked up about Brexit but do nothing to get the Tories elected. Membership has declined if not collapsed where as Corbyn has Half a million potential members as foot soldiers! Just saying...
    Erhhh rather than declining isn't the Tory membership the highest its been in ages (170k or something), while its Labour who have been losing members (albeit still with way more than the Tories)?
  • nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453

    HYUFD said:

    BigRich said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    52 for the SNP, is that all of the seats in Scotland?
    No, it is less than the 56 seats the SNP got in 2015 let alone all of the seats in Scotland
    You getting the troops ready for the invasion?
    He's going to split Scotland based on how they vote.........
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 70,930
    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    What has happened to our country? We are heading into a very dark world.

    Very depressing.

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189630063748235265

    https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/status/1189638740060332032

    This is wrong and sad. And it's not all Brexit, a lot of it is just the horrible effect of social media, making everyone angrier. That's what it does

    But Remainer MPs who have been trying to overturn the vote have no excuse, they should have expected this. They are literally saying to voters: your vote does not count, you have no say, you should shut up and go away and let me decide what happens to you and your family and your country. You are inferior.

    If people say that then they tend to get killed. This is historical fact, not hysteria.
    Oh give over. If Leavers had compromised we would have left by now.

    The Leave vote enabled the nasty BNP/EDL/UKIP undesirables to come out into the open and sensible people like you and @HYUFD are egging them on as footsoldiers in your culture war.
    Give over.

    If I was an MP and I stood up and did my obvious best to overturn a democratic vote, then I would expect a violent reaction. I would expect death threats. I would anticipate the need for police protection.

    The whole point of democracy - votes, referendums, elections - is to take away the anger of war and strife, in the destiny of nations, and turn it into a legal process, with rules and limits, which allow for passionate disagreement but vent the wild anger in a safe way.

    The floor of the House of Commons is divided by sword lengths, from the era of duelling.

    If you then stand up and say democracy is cancelled, the votes of certain people mean nothing, and must be reversed, well then you are inviting the return of political violence. It is a basic rule of human history. Someone like Soubry has been courting disaster for three years. She needs to stop and see the danger: for all of us,
    Balls.
    And a reminder of your fondness for forms of fascism. Or was that SeanT ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,846
    edited October 2019

    If I was a soft Tory I might be tempted by the Liberal Democrats.

    I certainly wouldn’t by “I’m with Jo”, and her divisive identity politics.


    Soft Tories are key (and have been fertile territory for the Libs since the 1970s). 2010 showed how difficult it is for the LDs to make seat gains if the Tory vote isn’t falling.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    viewcode said:

    spudgfsh said:

    Ignore the headline and the tactical voting hypotheticals, we have the first proper MRP poll reported in the Guardian. Sample of 46,000 and seat totals of:

    Conservative 364
    Labour 189
    Scottish National 52
    Liberal Democrat 23

    Conservative majority of 44 would be their largest since 1987.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study

    I don't want to discount this without reason but they (Focaldata) don't look like a company who will be publishing their polling tables. I'd want to see one from a company I'd heard from (was it yougov doing this kind of thing last time?).
    YouGov did MRP, as did Ashcroft. YouGov did well, Ashcroft did badly. Problem is, YouGov has had some personnel changes when Delta poll started up, so I don't know what they lost in the move. However I still await the YouGov MRP poll with great interest... :)
    as do I but I've learnt to take all polls and regressions with a pinch of salt. this particular one is short on detail on how it was done and who was polled.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479
    rpjs said:

    AndyJS said:

    Nicky Morgan standing down.

    She cites personal abuse and the effect on her family.
    Another Nottingham(ish) MP stands down
    Loughborough is in Leicestershire.
    Hence why I said ish. It’s very close to Nottingham.
    Well, the whole of the East Midlands is not that big, so everything can be described as Nottingham(ish).

    Derby is Nottingham(ish), Lincoln is Nottingham(ish). Leicester is Nottingham(ish).

    But, if I was a Londoner, I'd try and get these things right.
    I‘m originally from Nottingham you plum. I know where Loughborough is.
    Well, then you can describe it correctly as in Leicestershire.
    Nonono, in political discourse, “East Midlands” means only Mansfield, Broxtowe and Ashfield or whatever it’s called.

    Which irks me mightily as an exiled Rutlander.
    Rutland's tiny, it isn't a real county.

    I've been in hotels that occupy more acres than Rutland.
    It’s not even the smallest county. That’s the Isle of Wight - at low tide.
    The island is part of Hampshire.
    Nope, not for a long time.
This discussion has been closed.