politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Rule of Law 1 Cummings/Johnson 0

politicalbetting.com is proudly powered by WordPress with "Neat!" theme. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
0
This discussion has been closed.
politicalbetting.com is proudly powered by WordPress with "Neat!" theme. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
Comments
No call to resign (just "consider his position"). Seems no VONC.
Flunks it.
(But then seems to call for a GE. But when?)
Surely he doesn't make his speech to business leaders in NY now?
*rues bent needle*
*calls maintenance company to have it recalibrated*
Wowzers. When she said at the top it was unanimous, I thought Boris was home and dry.
To have such a clear-cut, unanimous judgment leaves La Boz absolutely out of wiggle-room.
The result of the election is uncertain, but it is coming whether you like it or not.
The court has ruled, the government must implement its ruling. That's separation of powers in a nutshell. Courts shouldn't result in changes of government. That would put far too much undue pressure on court cases which should stand on their own merit.
All those no deal bills that died with prorogation are no active again.
Are we still laying 2019 GE?
Should Tories be 1.41 most seats?
Boris has shown conclusively that he needs a majority in the next election or there will be no Brexit.
Boris = Watford.
Where is Ave It when you need him?
https://twitter.com/PoliticsJOE_UK/status/1176431923100618754
Avoided no deal (Boris and Cummings have never been no dealers) and responsibility for delivering no deal (hard work, loads of responsibility and blame)
Brings in more potential loyalists Tory MPs and less rebels after a GE
Plays fine with his base, who think he has been stopped from delivering Brexit by 31 Oct
The prorogation was designed to get an extension - it is the only logical conclusion beyond incredible incompetence.
Also Business Questions to the Leader of the House is going to be a real popcorn moment.
If they miss this chance he'll have time to regroup ready to shaft them again.
Surely they have to table a VONC? Anything else is tacit confidence in law breaking?!
That's particularly relevant if a VONC is passed. Theoretically, it might've been possible for Boris to refuse to resign, and not recommend Liz appoint anyone else, which would mean an automatic election after two weeks. But now, she'll probably be more inclined to go with Parliament's judgement (if a majority of MPs nominate an alternative PM) than just what Boris says.
Laura says it's a triumph for Boris.
Prorogue now for Queen's speech in 5 weeks time is unlawful.
The "only a few days" argument is dead because the SC clearly stated that recess is not the same as Prorogue.
Bercow has the extra protection of art ix bill of rights ( no court can make a call on ops in parliament), but I thought that protected the order in council for the prorogation too.
So yeah I don't know
Over in the States you can pretty much predict how each Justice will vote beforehand, not here.
Some of us said that it was unbelievably dumb at the time.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/09/24/labour-party-conference-vote-brexit-jeremy-corbyn-private-schools/
Oh boy..... Delegates to walk out of Watson's speech
https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1167376931014225920