politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Betting on whether or not we’ll have another EU referendum bef
Options
Comments
-
They weren't on Obama's listdaodao said:Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Our country needs strong borders and extreme vetting, NOW. Look what is happening all over Europe and, indeed, the world - a horrible mess!
1:08 PM - 29 Jan 2017
The policy has been implemented as an instantaneous executive order, and the details haven't been properly worked out, but why is it is wrong per se? If anything, it may be too restricted to be effective - why doesn't it cover all countries in the Levant and Arabia, extending to Pakistan?0 -
What the hell has AV got to do with Trumpton's visit? Even on AV-threader loving PB that's a stretch. Should we expect a new thread?0
-
Is that a fact or an alternative fact?GIN1138 said:
Yeah but... He's completely loopy...FrancisUrquhart said:
What gives you that idea? According to trump it is all working nicely.GIN1138 said:I'm not sure Donald Trumps Presidency is going to work out all that well...
0 -
It is in Saudi Arabia and under Daesh it's all embracing down to the last comma.MattW said:
That Twit seems to be taking a carefully misleading view of Sharia Law. It is not a monolith.MikeK said:https://twitter.com/SandraTXAS/status/825672301966397440
If I commented I might be banned!0 -
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment0 -
Hit 210,000 just now.david_herdson said:
170,000 now. Clictivism in action.dr_spyn said:100,000 now signed up to save HMQ from embarrassment.
0 -
Statistically it seems unlikely... There was Finnish-born guy called Tsurunen Marutei who naturalized and became an MP, so there's still hope if you really want to do it.MonikerDiCanio said:
Doubt Tokyo will elect a white Anglo-Saxon Protestant mayor any time soon.edmundintokyo said:
Tokyo doesn't have an immigration policy, because there is free movement within Japan and such things are decided at national level. Japan's immigration system doesn't discriminate by religion.MonikerDiCanio said:
What's Tokyo's policy on Islamic immigration ?edmundintokyo said:
I think that's over-stating it, but it's pretty obvious his Reichstag fire is going to be Islamic terrorism. His opponents need to prosecute the case that he's *incompetent*. There's no point convincing people that he's an arsehole if they think he's their arsehole.MonikerDiCanio said:
When he receives a hero's welcome from the public, the anti-democratic fuddy duddies will stroke out.Scott_P said:@PaulBrandITV: Hard to see how Trump visit will be anything other than disaster now. Even if PM ignores outrage, thin-skinned President will hate protests.
The current Leader of the Opposition is half-Taiwanese (born Taiwanese, naturalized Japanese in 1985), and got in a bit of trouble recently when it emerged that she still had Taiwanese citizenship, which is forbidden as Japan doesn't allow dual citizenship. She goes "Renho", which is a foreign derivation-sounding version of her Chinese name that she formerly used when she worked in soft porn [slightly NSFW for soft porn]. She came first in Tokyo in the last elections by quite a decent margin.0 -
https://twitter.com/FiveRights/status/825550863863255042
Letting you know who's taking the piss.0 -
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment0 -
https://twitter.com/drapermark37/status/825704822653411332
Of course not ONE refugee, Syrian or otherwise has been let in to Saudi.0 -
-
I doubt that there is anything fishy going on. Had looked at it earlier on this morning. Had same message from a Twitter link - but signature can only be added if confirmation email is received and acknowledged. Unless of course Russian hackers have broken the system.PlatoSaid said:Dizzy
Something fishy going on with this petition. I clicked a link to it from Twitter and it appears to have auto-signed it. https://t.co/ya8TXhBFdU0 -
Yep, because we should allow our standards to be set by a motley collection of theocracies, dictatorships and one party states.MikeK said:
0 -
Classic tennis final....0
-
It's wishful thinking maybe, but I hope that Trump finds that it's no coincidence that the Labrea Tar Pits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pits
and the Tar Baby
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar-Baby
are American.0 -
Someone who whines about being banned calls for ban. Marvellous stuff.isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
Anyway, as your hero said, what's wrong with racism?0 -
I don't blame her for that at all. As I have said on here a few times, what else could she do? She could hardly tell him to piss off. But it is a powerful photo, nevertheless. And May's reactions to the Trump ban yesterday made it even more powerful. She said that together the US and the UK will once again lead the world. She has made her bed with Trump. That photo will come up time and time again.isam said:
I wonder if the hand grab by Trump was entirely because he was about to launch this policy? Hard to know what TM the PM could have done, I think it is harsh to blame herSouthamObserver said:
So, just over 48% of the population. Isn't this supposed to be a time of healing and coming together? Clearly, by walking hand-in-hand with President Trump our PM is failing to achieve that aim.Sean_F said:
I doubt if Trump will get a hero's welcome, but the outrage about his visit is mostly confined to places that voted Yes to AV.Roger said:
A hero's welcome? They've just got 100,000 signatures in half an hour saying the trip should be cancelled.MonikerDiCanio said:
When he receives a hero's welcome from the public, the anti-democratic fuddy duddies will stroke out.Scott_P said:@PaulBrandITV: Hard to see how Trump visit will be anything other than disaster now. Even if PM ignores outrage, thin-skinned President will hate protests.
0 -
There is a very strong correlation between areas which voted YesToAV and those people signing the Trump position (and indeed the previous Ban Trump petition).Jobabob said:What the hell has AV got to do with Trumpton's visit? Even on AV-threader loving PB that's a stretch. Should we expect a new thread?
Whereas the people who signed the 'stop immigration' petitions had a good correlation with marginal constituencies.
I don't think it will be long before we have media reports that all the people in a Crouch End café have signed the Trump petition.
Though I suspect we'll get fewer reports on the thoughts from Nuneaton pubs.
0 -
Well I get banned all the time for much less., virtually nothing in fact. Consistency would be nice.Theuniondivvie said:
Someone who whines about being banned calls for ban. Marvellous stuff.isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
Anyway, as your hero said, what's wrong with racism?
He didn't mean "what's wrong with being nasty to people because of their race"... he was talking of a time when nationality and race were less fluid than now. I blame the fact he was on his death bed with Parkinson's for him being a bit out of touch0 -
T shirt for President Trump's State Visit to The United Kingdom.
https://twitter.com/Queen_UK/status/8257028343143424020 -
No, it's far more than that. Over a thousand people are signing every minute. Frankly, I'm tempted to. It's ludicrous that a full state visit has been offered so early. It's a massive hostage to fortune. Better to leave it to a second term, which might not happen and which might mean he can't avoid Charles.AndyJS said:
The usual suspects who sign these petitions.Bromptonaut said:Petition opposing Trump's visit to the UK has passed 100,000.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928
Edit - Whoops, old news.
Given his thin-skinness, he could well pull out anyway.0 -
"Trump’s temporary immigration ban set a mental anchor in your brain that is frankly shocking. It will make his eventual permanent immigration plan (”extreme vetting”) look tame by comparison. The Persuasion Filter says that’s his strategy. Because that’s ALWAYS his strategy. He acts the same way every time. He wrote a book about it. He talks about it publicly. Then he does it right in front of us, over and over. And no matter how many times he does it, half the country still thinks the opening offer is the real one.
I’ve mentioned in this blog a few times that persuasion works even when the subject of the persuasion recognizes all the techniques as they happen. This is a perfect case. The left has been watching Trump make big offers and dial them back for the past year. And yet they still think this time it will be different. The Persuasion Filter says that 70-year old Trump will act the same way today as he has for the past several decades: Big first offer, then negotiate.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/156532225711/the-persuasion-filter-and-immigration0 -
His question wasn't about surveillance, it was about immigration.SeanT said:
Lol. You're a moron and a hypocriteedmundintokyo said:
Tokyo doesn't have an immigration policy, because there is free movement within Japan and such things are decided at national level. Japan's immigration system doesn't discriminate by religion.MonikerDiCanio said:
What's Tokyo's policy on Islamic immigration ?edmundintokyo said:
I think that's over-stating it, but it's pretty obvious his Reichstag fire is going to be Islamic terrorism. His opponents need to prosecute the case that he's *incompetent*. There's no point convincing people that he's an arsehole if they think he's their arsehole.MonikerDiCanio said:
When he receives a hero's welcome from the public, the anti-democratic fuddy duddies will stroke out.Scott_P said:@PaulBrandITV: Hard to see how Trump visit will be anything other than disaster now. Even if PM ignores outrage, thin-skinned President will hate protests.
"Japan's Supreme Court has upheld the government's blanket surveillance of the country's Muslim community."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/muslims-japan-government-surveillance-top-court-green-lit-islamaphobia-a7109761.html0 -
I see. Thanks. Be interesting to see the correlation between the "stop immigration" signatories and areas with very low immigration.....another_richard said:
There is a very strong correlation between areas which voted YesToAV and those people signing the Trump position (and indeed the previous Ban Trump petition).Jobabob said:What the hell has AV got to do with Trumpton's visit? Even on AV-threader loving PB that's a stretch. Should we expect a new thread?
Whereas the people who signed the 'stop immigration' petitions had a good correlation with marginal constituencies.
I don't think it will be long before we have media reports that all the people in a Crouch End café have signed the Trump petition.
Though I suspect we'll get fewer reports on the thoughts from Nuneaton pubs.0 -
Is there a date for this state visit ?david_herdson said:
No, it's far more than that. Over a thousand people are signing every minute. Frankly, I'm tempted to. It's ludicrous that a full state visit has been offered so early. It's a massive hostage to fortune. Better to leave it to a second term, which might not happen and which might mean he can't avoid Charles.AndyJS said:
The usual suspects who sign these petitions.Bromptonaut said:Petition opposing Trump's visit to the UK has passed 100,000.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928
Edit - Whoops, old news.
Given his thin-skinness, he could well pull out anyway.
Offering a state visit is not necessarily the same as hosting one.
HMQ's diary might be as fully booked as your local dentist's.
Especially with her and Philip's age and health.0 -
When is the Trumpet due to arrive for his 'State Visit' ?david_herdson said:
No, it's far more than that. Over a thousand people are signing every minute. Frankly, I'm tempted to. It's ludicrous that a full state visit has been offered so early. It's a massive hostage to fortune. Better to leave it to a second term, which might not happen and which might mean he can't avoid Charles.AndyJS said:
The usual suspects who sign these petitions.Bromptonaut said:Petition opposing Trump's visit to the UK has passed 100,000.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928
Edit - Whoops, old news.
Given his thin-skinness, he could well pull out anyway.0 -
But seeing as you and I are both reasonably intelligent men, who don't think the world should be run to suit a 24hr news cycle, shouldn't we pity the fact that it will be used against her rather than keep citing it?SouthamObserver said:
I don't blame her for that at all. As I have said on here a few times, what else could she do? She could hardly tell him to piss off. But it is a powerful photo, nevertheless. And May's reactions to the Trump ban yesterday made it even more powerful. She said that together the US and the UK will once again lead the world. She has made her bed with Trump. That photo will come up time and time again.isam said:
I wonder if the hand grab by Trump was entirely because he was about to launch this policy? Hard to know what TM the PM could have done, I think it is harsh to blame herSouthamObserver said:
So, just over 48% of the population. Isn't this supposed to be a time of healing and coming together? Clearly, by walking hand-in-hand with President Trump our PM is failing to achieve that aim.Sean_F said:
I doubt if Trump will get a hero's welcome, but the outrage about his visit is mostly confined to places that voted Yes to AV.Roger said:
A hero's welcome? They've just got 100,000 signatures in half an hour saying the trip should be cancelled.MonikerDiCanio said:
When he receives a hero's welcome from the public, the anti-democratic fuddy duddies will stroke out.Scott_P said:@PaulBrandITV: Hard to see how Trump visit will be anything other than disaster now. Even if PM ignores outrage, thin-skinned President will hate protests.
0 -
Just watching BBC news after lunch at the in laws...... father in law asks "what is brexit"....
0 -
I understand his confusion - I have no idea myself! ;-)Scrapheap_as_was said:Just watching BBC news after lunch at the in laws...... father in law asks "what is brexit"....
0 -
Michael McFaul @McFaul · 7h7 hours ago
Syrian human rights activist @radwanziadeh is trapped in Istanbul & cant come home. He's lived in US for 10 years; 3 kids all US citizens
0 -
The petition appears to have a widespread of signatures - South Africa, South Sandwich Islands.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928.json
0 -
Footie on telly has got him off the channels he watches otherwise. Westerns, midsummer murders, columbo, murder she wrote et al. He does watch country file though for the weeks weather.Jobabob said:
I understand his confusion - I have no idea myself! ;-)Scrapheap_as_was said:Just watching BBC news after lunch at the in laws...... father in law asks "what is brexit"....
Astonishing tho.0 -
Brexit is brexit! You're most welcome.Jobabob said:
I understand his confusion - I have no idea myself! ;-)Scrapheap_as_was said:Just watching BBC news after lunch at the in laws...... father in law asks "what is brexit"....
Just completed weekly round-robin call with the sibs. Both blissfully ignorant of the raging furore of the past 24 hours (which is about 20 Twitter lifetimes). It's clear that not all of us exist on the cutting edge of current affairs. 0 -
isam said:
But seeing as you and I are both reasonably intelligent men, who don't think the world should be run to suit a 24hr news cycle, shouldn't we pity the fact that it will be used against her rather than keep citing it?SouthamObserver said:
I don't blame her for that at all. As I have said on here a few times, what else could she do? She could hardly tell him to piss off. But it is a powerful photo, nevertheless. And May's reactions to the Trump ban yesterday made it even more powerful. She said that together the US and the UK will once again lead the world. She has made her bed with Trump. That photo will come up time and time again.isam said:
I wonder if the hand grab by Trump was entirely because he was about to launch this policy? Hard to know what TM the PM could have done, I think it is harsh to blame herSouthamObserver said:
So, just over 48% of the population. Isn't this supposed to be a time of healing and coming together? Clearly, by walking hand-in-hand with President Trump our PM is failing to achieve that aim.Sean_F said:
I doubt if Trump will get a hero's welcome, but the outrage about his visit is mostly confined to places that voted Yes to AV.Roger said:
A hero's welcome? They've just got 100,000 signatures in half an hour saying the trip should be cancelled.MonikerDiCanio said:
When he receives a hero's welcome from the public, the anti-democratic fuddy duddies will stroke out.Scott_P said:@PaulBrandITV: Hard to see how Trump visit will be anything other than disaster now. Even if PM ignores outrage, thin-skinned President will hate protests.
It's all rather like the rush to give Obama a Nobel Peace Prize months after his inauguration. Trump does not a need a state visit in order to come here and discuss policy with the government.david_herdson said:
No, it's far more than that. Over a thousand people are signing every minute. Frankly, I'm tempted to. It's ludicrous that a full state visit has been offered so early. It's a massive hostage to fortune. Better to leave it to a second term, which might not happen and which might mean he can't avoid Charles.AndyJS said:
The usual suspects who sign these petitions.Bromptonaut said:Petition opposing Trump's visit to the UK has passed 100,000.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928
Edit - Whoops, old news.
Given his thin-skinness, he could well pull out anyway.
0 -
Scrapheap_as_was said:
Just watching BBC news after lunch at the in laws...... father in law asks "what is brexit"....
Brexit is what you have in the morning.
In the middle of the day, you get Lunchit.
0 -
What's Tokyo's policy on Islamic immigration ?
Tokyo doesn't have an immigration policy, because there is free movement within Japan and such things are decided at national level. Japan's immigration system doesn't discriminate by religion.
Is this an appropriate time to use the word synecdoche?
0 -
That petition may end up understating opposition as a lot of Corbynistas won't sign it:
https://twitter.com/david__osland/status/8256959696059924480 -
deleted0
-
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.0 -
Asked a class of Y11s last week who the Prime Minister was: got the confident and unironc reply of "David Cameron" from the first boy I asked (and this is in a grammar school). He seemed shocked when the rest of the class reacted with derision...Scrapheap_as_was said:Just watching BBC news after lunch at the in laws...... father in law asks "what is brexit"....
0 -
I am with Dizzy on this petition. It is telling me I have already signed when that is untrue.
Either the thing is being manipulated or the system is not working as it should.
Any journalists around to cover this?
https://twitter.com/mattwardman/status/8257139876984913940 -
Ha! It wouldn't embarrass her in the slightest. She's had to put up with worse than him.SouthamObserver said:That petition may end up understating opposition as a lot of Corbynistas won't sign it:
https://twitter.com/david__osland/status/8256959696059924480 -
Another moron who should clearly know better.PlatoSaid said:I see India Knight of STimes fame has joined the ranks of those suggesting Trump should be assassinated - and duly reported to the Secret Service.
Hope she isn't planning a trip to the US anytime in the next few yrs.
Surely people have realised by now that making comments about wanting senior politicians killed, tends to attract the not inconsiderable attention of those charged with making sure they're not!0 -
-
Sounds as if 'Operation Trump' was launched by a couple of advisers who were more keen than capable:SouthamObserver said:isam said:
But seeing as you and I are both reasonably intelligent men, who don't think the world should be run to suit a 24hr news cycle, shouldn't we pity the fact that it will be used against her rather than keep citing it?SouthamObserver said:
I don't blame her for that at all. As I have said on here a few times, what else could she do? She could hardly tell him to piss off. But it is a powerful photo, nevertheless. And May's reactions to the Trump ban yesterday made it even more powerful. She said that together the US and the UK will once again lead the world. She has made her bed with Trump. That photo will come up time and time again.isam said:
I wonder if the hand grab by Trump was entirely because he was about to launch this policy? Hard to know what TM the PM could have done, I think it is harsh to blame herSouthamObserver said:
So, just over 48% of the population. Isn't this supposed to be a time of healing and coming together? Clearly, by walking hand-in-hand with President Trump our PM is failing to achieve that aim.Sean_F said:
I doubt if Trump will get a hero's welcome, but the outrage about his visit is mostly confined to places that voted Yes to AV.Roger said:
A hero's welcome? They've just got 100,000 signatures in half an hour saying the trip should be cancelled.
It's all rather like the rush to give Obama a Nobel Peace Prize months after his inauguration. Trump does not a need a state visit in order to come here and discuss policy with the government.david_herdson said:
No, it's far more than that. Over a thousand people are signing every minute. Frankly, I'm tempted to. It's ludicrous that a full state visit has been offered so early. It's a massive hostage to fortune. Better to leave it to a second term, which might not happen and which might mean he can't avoid Charles.AndyJS said:
The usual suspects who sign these petitions.Bromptonaut said:Petition opposing Trump's visit to the UK has passed 100,000.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/171928
Edit - Whoops, old news.
Given his thin-skinness, he could well pull out anyway.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/05/theresa-may-sent-two-closest-aides-meet-donald-trump-backed/
Panic had set in when the Farage-in-the-lift photo was being beamed across the globe, so the comment about 24-hour news cycles is apposite.0 -
Well some would say its not racism because its not racism. She could have been a white bloke for all I know, couldn't tell.JosiasJessop said:
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.
The rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions would not allow mass immigration of a religion that is at odds with the host society0 -
It's because some people are sharing a link with their own session id in the URL so it shows that it's been signed already. It doesn't mean the count is dodgy.MattW said:I am with Dizzy on this petition. It is telling me I have already signed when that is untrue.
Either the thing is being manipulated or the system is not working as it should.0 -
England desparately trying NOT to get a wicket in the T20.0
-
NEW THREAD
0 -
I want good relations with individuals. You prefer to lump certain groups together so that real and perceived bad things done by *some* becomes a reason to take away rights from *all* of that group.SeanT said:
Do you want "good relations" with men and communities that put their women in burqas? Would you want good relations with white communities that kept their servile blacks on a leash?JosiasJessop said:
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.
There is no difference.
I want these communities to fuck off.
As you showed yesterday, when a Muslim woman doing her job at an airport was verbally and physically abused, you backed the attacker.0 -
Hmm.williamglenn said:
It's because some people are sharing a link with their own session id in the URL so it shows that it's been signed already. It doesn't mean the count is dodgy.MattW said:I am with Dizzy on this petition. It is telling me I have already signed when that is untrue.
Either the thing is being manipulated or the system is not working as it should.
I followed the one from Jonathon Freedland here:
https://twitter.com/Freedland/status/825689782974050305
The link is a couple of hours old so the session id - and I couldn't obviously see one on the link - should have expired.0 -
So you are stupid, sexist, and a coward. And yes, I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward.isam said:
Well some would say its not racism because its not racism. She could have been a white bloke for all I know, couldn't tell.JosiasJessop said:
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.
The rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions would not allow mass immigration of a religion that is at odds with the host society
If the man had turned around and decked you - as many men of whatever ethnicity would, you'd be playing the victim.
But he didn't, so you try to play the victim card by stating how nervous you were on the journey home.
What a low, pathetic individual you are.0 -
Who ran away?JosiasJessop said:
So you are stupid, sexist, and a coward. And yes, I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward.isam said:
Well some would say its not racism because its not racism. She could have been a white bloke for all I know, couldn't tell.JosiasJessop said:
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.
The rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions would not allow mass immigration of a religion that is at odds with the host society
If the man had turned around and decked you - as many men of whatever ethnicity would, you'd be playing the victim.
But he didn't, so you try to play the victim card by stating how nervous you were on the journey home.
What a low, pathetic individual you are.
You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on0 -
I will say it to your face. And the great thing is, in that little dried-up slug that passes for your soul, you will know I'm right.isam said:
Who ran away?JosiasJessop said:
So you are stupid, sexist, and a coward. And yes, I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward.isam said:
Well some would say its not racism because its not racism. She could have been a white bloke for all I know, couldn't tell.JosiasJessop said:
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.
The rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions would not allow mass immigration of a religion that is at odds with the host society
If the man had turned around and decked you - as many men of whatever ethnicity would, you'd be playing the victim.
But he didn't, so you try to play the victim card by stating how nervous you were on the journey home.
What a low, pathetic individual you are.
You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on
I mean, leaving all the other complicating factors aside, do you really think that wolf-whistling is acceptable nowadays? And the fact you publicise it by mentioning it on here (in what reads like a mistaken act of bravado): really?0 -
I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertionJosiasJessop said:
I will say it to your face. And the great thing is, in that little dried-up slug that passes for your soul, you will know I'm right.isam said:
Who ran away?JosiasJessop said:
So you are stupid, sexist, and a coward. And yes, I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward.isam said:
Well some would say its not racism because its not racism. She could have been a white bloke for all I know, couldn't tell.JosiasJessop said:
Back on January 4th you posted the following:isam said:
@PBModerator Ban this idiot, I am not a racistRoger said:
You're a Powellite which makes you a racist which pisses a lot of people off. Actually not as many as it shouldisam said:
Ok. Sad that there has to be sanctions! I'd keep a careful eye on the "indirectly" part if I were you.PBModerator said:Isam/Jobabob
This conversation is now at an end.
In future neither of you are to interact with each other, directly or indirectly.
Let it be known though for the record, that I did not say the things he is accusing me of.
If he changes name again be sure to alert me so I know not to comment
"I wolf whistled at a woman in a burqa in front of her old man in Covent Garden last year just to mess with him... a very nervous tube ride home"
Now, some will say that that's not racism. But it is hardly the actions of a rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions.
The rational person who wants good relations between people of different religions would not allow mass immigration of a religion that is at odds with the host society
If the man had turned around and decked you - as many men of whatever ethnicity would, you'd be playing the victim.
But he didn't, so you try to play the victim card by stating how nervous you were on the journey home.
What a low, pathetic individual you are.
You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on
I mean, leaving all the other complicating factors aside, do you really think that wolf-whistling is acceptable nowadays? And the fact you publicise it by mentioning it on here (in what reads like a mistaken act of bravado): really?
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.0 -
Excuses, excuses.isam said:I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertion
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.
You actively want conflict. And before you start creating self-serving excuses again, just remember that the very people you seem to hate make exactly the same arguments you do.
E.g. on a middle-eastern beach: "But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman in a bikini I felt like ridiculing it."
You and the Muslim extremists are more alike than you'd like to admit. Any excuse for hate.0 -
Of course I don't want conflict. But when you import masses of people with a completely different worldview to the county they arrive in, conflict is unavoidable.JosiasJessop said:
Excuses, excuses.isam said:I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertion
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.
You actively want conflict. And before you start creating self-serving excuses again, just remember that the very people you seem to hate make exactly the same arguments you do.
E.g. on a middle-eastern beach: "But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman in a bikini I felt like ridiculing it."
You and the Muslim extremists are more alike than you'd like to admit. Any excuse for hate.
It seems like you want conflict.. with me!0 -
@CharlesCharles said:
Do you have a source? I'm sure I'd seem somewhere that it was more than all over Presidents added together!SouthamObserver said:An interesting fact: President Obama issued fewer executive orders than any two-term US president since the 1890s.
I suspect that you are thinking of his horrible record-breaking pardoning of criminals.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/obama-granted-clemency-unlike-any-other-president-in-history/
0 -
You say you don't want conflict, yet you actively do something that might cause conflict with a stranger for absolutely no reason. As I say below, it rather sounds as if you hoped there would be conflict.isam said:
Of course I don't want conflict. But when you import masses of people with a completely different worldview to the county they arrive in, conflict is unavoidable.JosiasJessop said:
Excuses, excuses.isam said:I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertion
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.
You actively want conflict. And before you start creating self-serving excuses again, just remember that the very people you seem to hate make exactly the same arguments you do.
E.g. on a middle-eastern beach: "But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman in a bikini I felt like ridiculing it."
You and the Muslim extremists are more alike than you'd like to admit. Any excuse for hate.
It seems like you want conflict.. with me!
And you're the person who wrote: "You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on"0 -
It wasn't for no reason, it was because his wife was wearing a burqa. Could have been his sister or his mum I suppose.JosiasJessop said:
You say you don't want conflict, yet you actively do something that might cause conflict with a stranger for absolutely no reason. As I say below, it rather sounds as if you hoped there would be conflict.isam said:
Of course I don't want conflict. But when you import masses of people with a completely different worldview to the county they arrive in, conflict is unavoidable.JosiasJessop said:
Excuses, excuses.isam said:I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertion
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.
You actively want conflict. And before you start creating self-serving excuses again, just remember that the very people you seem to hate make exactly the same arguments you do.
E.g. on a middle-eastern beach: "But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman in a bikini I felt like ridiculing it."
You and the Muslim extremists are more alike than you'd like to admit. Any excuse for hate.
It seems like you want conflict.. with me!
And you're the person who wrote: "You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on"
Yes, I wrote that as a reaction to "I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward."
All I said was say it and see... it's all a bit silly, you aren't going to say it to my face are you, as we are unlikely to ever meet.
Do you think there is a point in keeping on about this? I am no less certain I am right than when you first started baiting me, I am sure you feel the same
0 -
Yes just like him, more faces than the town clockFreggles said:
Like Boris Johnson?malcolmg said:
I think you will find a lot of heads nodding and saying brave man, a bit over the top but someone needs to sort it out and at least he is first one to try. Only Liberal lefties will be crying into their quinoa.Freggles said:If Theresa May is to continue enabling Trump in his neo fascist agenda, I will.consider her less electable than Jezza
0 -
leaves 65,000,000 to like him does it not.Freggles said:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-poll-international-countries-uk-hillary-clinton-rcp-us-presidential-live-election-a7367591.html?amp?client=ms-android-motorolaRoger said:
A hero's welcome? They've just got 100,000 signatures in half an hour saying the trip should be cancelled.MonikerDiCanio said:
When he receives a hero's welcome from the public, the anti-democratic fuddy duddies will stroke out.Scott_P said:@PaulBrandITV: Hard to see how Trump visit will be anything other than disaster now. Even if PM ignores outrage, thin-skinned President will hate protests.
0 -
As the next thread says, we shouldn't tolerate the intolerant. Your actions show that you are just as intolerant as the people you hate. Worse, you brag about it.isam said:
It wasn't for no reason, it was because his wife was wearing a burqa. Could have been his sister or his mum I suppose.JosiasJessop said:
You say you don't want conflict, yet you actively do something that might cause conflict with a stranger for absolutely no reason. As I say below, it rather sounds as if you hoped there would be conflict.isam said:
Of course I don't want conflict. But when you import masses of people with a completely different worldview to the county they arrive in, conflict is unavoidable.JosiasJessop said:
Excuses, excuses.isam said:I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertion
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.
You actively want conflict. And before you start creating self-serving excuses again, just remember that the very people you seem to hate make exactly the same arguments you do.
E.g. on a middle-eastern beach: "But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman in a bikini I felt like ridiculing it."
You and the Muslim extremists are more alike than you'd like to admit. Any excuse for hate.
It seems like you want conflict.. with me!
And you're the person who wrote: "You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on"
Yes, I wrote that as a reaction to "I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward."
All I said was say it and see... it's all a bit silly, you aren't going to say it to my face are you, as we are unlikely to ever meet.
Do you think there is a point in keeping on about this? I am no less certain I am right than when you first started baiting me, I am sure you feel the same
"it was because his wife was wearing a burqa"
This is exactly the same sort of pathetic excuse as: "It was because she was Jewish / English / she looked at me in a funny way." I'm guessing you would probably find such excuses distasteful?
Just to make it clear: I don't like the burqa; I find it distasteful. There are a few other things that I find distasteful, but I accept that, from the law at the moment, people can do them and that I should not abuse them in the street for it.0 -
Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagreeJosiasJessop said:
As the next thread says, we shouldn't tolerate the intolerant. Your actions show that you are just as intolerant as the people you hate. Worse, you brag about it.isam said:
It wasn't for no reason, it was because his wife was wearing a burqa. Could have been his sister or his mum I suppose.JosiasJessop said:
You say you don't want conflict, yet you actively do something that might cause conflict with a stranger for absolutely no reason. As I say below, it rather sounds as if you hoped there would be conflict.isam said:
Of course I don't want conflict. But when you import masses of people with a completely different worldview to the county they arrive in, conflict is unavoidable.JosiasJessop said:
Excuses, excuses.isam said:I am afraid you are wrong on that first assertion
On your second, I would never wolf whistle in any other circumstance, don't think I ever have. But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman dressed up in medieval garb in 21st Century London I felt like ridiculing it, so I did.
You actively want conflict. And before you start creating self-serving excuses again, just remember that the very people you seem to hate make exactly the same arguments you do.
E.g. on a middle-eastern beach: "But when I saw the creepy sight of a woman in a bikini I felt like ridiculing it."
You and the Muslim extremists are more alike than you'd like to admit. Any excuse for hate.
It seems like you want conflict.. with me!
And you're the person who wrote: "You can say it to my face if you like and see how you get on"
Yes, I wrote that as a reaction to "I'd call you all of these, and a racist, to your face. And unlike you I wouldn't run away, because I'm right and you're a coward."
All I said was say it and see... it's all a bit silly, you aren't going to say it to my face are you, as we are unlikely to ever meet.
Do you think there is a point in keeping on about this? I am no less certain I am right than when you first started baiting me, I am sure you feel the same
"it was because his wife was wearing a burqa"
This is exactly the same sort of pathetic excuse as: "It was because she was Jewish / English / she looked at me in a funny way." I'm guessing you would probably find such excuses distasteful?
Just to make it clear: I don't like the burqa; I find it distasteful. There are a few other things that I find distasteful, but I accept that, from the law at the moment, people can do them and that I should not abuse them in the street for it.0 -
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.0 -
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.0 -
It's not a barrage of abuse; and that's a bit rich from someone who thinks it's good to abuse someone on the streets for reasons of their religion.isam said:
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.
You'd be outraged if a Muslim abused a white woman on the street for wearing a miniskirt, even if he just said "I was just mucking about."
I am hoping you might actually see that what you did was stupid and intolerant. And that's the best I can say about it.0 -
Crucial difference being white women are not generally forced to wear mini skirts whenever out in public by their husbands (who hold a disproportionate amount of influence over them, backed by their strict religious community)JosiasJessop said:
It's not a barrage of abuse; and that's a bit rich from someone who thinks it's good to abuse someone on the streets for reasons of their religion.isam said:
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.
You'd be outraged if a Muslim abused a white woman on the street for wearing a miniskirt, even if he just said "I was just mucking about."
I am hoping you might actually see that what you did was stupid and intolerant. And that's the best I can say about it.
You can go on all day if you like, I will never give in. I would do the same again in the blink of an eye, no regrets whatsoever. Just accept we don't agree, I am not trying to convince you to like me or what I say, as I said I couldn't care less0 -
I guess you'd do the same thing again; the fact you're willing to admit that says more about you and your hate-filed views of life than anything I could say.isam said:
Crucial difference being white women are not generally forced to wear mini skirts whenever out in public by their husbands (who hold a disproportionate amount of influence over them, backed by their strict religious community)JosiasJessop said:
It's not a barrage of abuse; and that's a bit rich from someone who thinks it's good to abuse someone on the streets for reasons of their religion.isam said:
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.
You'd be outraged if a Muslim abused a white woman on the street for wearing a miniskirt, even if he just said "I was just mucking about."
I am hoping you might actually see that what you did was stupid and intolerant. And that's the best I can say about it.
You can go on all day if you like, I will never give in. I would do the same again in the blink of an eye, no regrets whatsoever. Just accept we don't agree, I am not trying to convince you to like me or what I say, as I said I couldn't care less
As I said before: you're just as bad as the people you hate. It's quite delicious to see you actually admit it.0 -
Whatever, bore someone who caresJosiasJessop said:
I guess you'd do the same thing again; the fact you're willing to admit that says more about you and your hate-filed views of life than anything I could say.isam said:
Crucial difference being white women are not generally forced to wear mini skirts whenever out in public by their husbands (who hold a disproportionate amount of influence over them, backed by their strict religious community)JosiasJessop said:
It's not a barrage of abuse; and that's a bit rich from someone who thinks it's good to abuse someone on the streets for reasons of their religion.isam said:
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.
You'd be outraged if a Muslim abused a white woman on the street for wearing a miniskirt, even if he just said "I was just mucking about."
I am hoping you might actually see that what you did was stupid and intolerant. And that's the best I can say about it.
You can go on all day if you like, I will never give in. I would do the same again in the blink of an eye, no regrets whatsoever. Just accept we don't agree, I am not trying to convince you to like me or what I say, as I said I couldn't care less
As I said before: you're just as bad as the people you hate. It's quite delicious to see you actually admit it.
What do I have to do to make you stop? Do you want the last word?0 -
It's not about having the last word or not; it's trying to get you to see some sense. Sadly it seems that you are incapable of seeing the folly of your actions.isam said:
Whatever, bore someone who caresJosiasJessop said:
I guess you'd do the same thing again; the fact you're willing to admit that says more about you and your hate-filed views of life than anything I could say.isam said:
Crucial difference being white women are not generally forced to wear mini skirts whenever out in public by their husbands (who hold a disproportionate amount of influence over them, backed by their strict religious community)JosiasJessop said:
It's not a barrage of abuse; and that's a bit rich from someone who thinks it's good to abuse someone on the streets for reasons of their religion.isam said:
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
Wolf-whistling is not 'making fun', especially when you do it for the intolerant, hate-filled reasons you did it. And your reaction - that *you* were nervous on the way home - is just delicious. You try to make yourself the victim.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You really are like the people you hate.
You'd be outraged if a Muslim abused a white woman on the street for wearing a miniskirt, even if he just said "I was just mucking about."
I am hoping you might actually see that what you did was stupid and intolerant. And that's the best I can say about it.
You can go on all day if you like, I will never give in. I would do the same again in the blink of an eye, no regrets whatsoever. Just accept we don't agree, I am not trying to convince you to like me or what I say, as I said I couldn't care less
As I said before: you're just as bad as the people you hate. It's quite delicious to see you actually admit it.
What do I have to do to make you stop? Do you want the last word?
You've actually made things worse by admitting you'd do it again.
You're going to end up getting arrested or beaten up. Either of which would probably make you feel a martyr.0 -
I have said "agree to disagree".JosiasJessop said:
It's not about having the last word or not; it's trying to get you to see some sense. Sadly it seems that you are incapable of seeing the folly of your actions.isam said:
Whatever, bore someone who caresJosiasJessop said:
I guess you'd do the same thing again; the fact you're willing to admit that says more about you and your hate-filed views of life than anything I could say.isam said:
Crucial difference being white women are not generally forced to wear mini skirts whenever out in public by their husbands (who hold a disproportionate amount of influence over them, backed by their strict religious community)JosiasJessop said:
I am hoping you might actually see that what you did was stupid and intolerant. And that's the best I can say about it.isam said:
I was just mucking about, get over it. I really couldn't care less what you think, don't see what you are getting out of continuing this futile barrage of abuse.JosiasJessop said:
You really are like the people you hate.isam said:Well I don't think making fun of something is beyond the pale, you obviously do, what can I say? Agree to disagree
You can go on all day if you like, I will never give in. I would do the same again in the blink of an eye, no regrets whatsoever. Just accept we don't agree, I am not trying to convince you to like me or what I say, as I said I couldn't care less
As I said before: you're just as bad as the people you hate. It's quite delicious to see you actually admit it.
What do I have to do to make you stop? Do you want the last word?
You've actually made things worse by admitting you'd do it again.
You're going to end up getting arrested or beaten up. Either of which would probably make you feel a martyr.
You can think whatever you like and make incorrect predictions of how I would feel or act, what can I do about that? This whole nonsense started on an incorrect remark from you, as I have no problem with Asian people, I have several Asian friends, and would not wolf whistle sarcastically at an Asian woman who wasn't wearing a burqa, or a woman on her own who was wearing one. I would not be friends with someone whose wife wore a burqa, and the wolf whistle was to annoy the man who is comfortable with his wife wearing one
None of that is racist
I doubt I would get beaten up0 -
The law might (and I think will) disagree with you on that point.
Besides, it all started when you tried to be a braggart with your sick prejudices and hatred.
You had absolutely no idea about their situation, or what was happening. All you did was spread a little more hatred in the world. Well done!0 -
Couldn'tJosiasJessop said:The law might (and I think will) disagree with you on that point.
Besides, it all started when you tried to be a braggart with your sick prejudices and hatred.
You had absolutely no idea about their situation, or what was happening. All you did was spread a little more hatred in the world. Well done!
Care
Less
xxx0
This discussion has been closed.