Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

Friends, countrymen, lend me your Keirs, this is going to be a long night but who does this higher t

1246

Comments

  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    That's provincial compared to North London.
    She is OK, but I don't listen to her and hear small town Britain. She sounds just like the city dwelling middle class activist types I know across the UK, who don't know anyone who votes Tory or voted for Brexit. The anger she shows and that of the people trying to cancel Brexit sound the same to me There is a disconnect between the evidence (votes) and their experience (twitter and friendship bubble) which means they cannot hear. This is fundamental to Labours current problems.
    She’s really not middle class. She’s echt working class. A single Mum from a Stockport comp with no GCSEs who made it to MP and deputy leader? That’s admirable, however you spin it

    But this Palestine stuff is depressing, however righteous. They all get captured by this
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125
    Floater said:

    The Conservatives have won the first seat to be declared in the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council elections.

    The Tories have taken the previously Labour stronghold seat in the Kingswood ward in Nuneaton.

    They polled 793 votes, compared to 530 for Labour, 80 for the Green Party and 32 for the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition.

    In the Midlands, and could mean that Nuneaton could be another Con GAIN Council?
    https://twitter.com/jonnyross05/status/1390468884638142469

    Hearing Conservatives are well on course to GAIN Nuneaton and Bedworth council from No Overall Control.
    Places that used to be reliably Labour but have gone from them in the past couple of decades.
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Sunderland

    2 Lab in Shiney Row
    1 Lab and 1 Con in Washington South
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    Washington South (Sunderland) council result:

    Con: 37.0% (+8.5)
    Lab: 36.5% (-22.7)
    Grn: 16.3% (+16.3)
    LDem: 7.5% (-4.0)
    UKIP: 2.7% (+2.7)
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    edited May 2021
    https://twitter.com/JHarrisonLDR/status/1390464287928463361

    38 is the magic number for a majority in Sunderland.
    Labour had 51 yesterday, currently down to 45 with another 13 wards still to declare, including two double-headers.
    I think Fergie called this "squeaky bum time"

    Currently I believe that Labour are up to 44 (he's counting undeclared as no change until declared), with 11 seats left (both double headers declared, 3 Lab hold, 1 Con gain), so 33 to 44 the possible range.
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    edited May 2021

    Washington South (Sunderland) council result:

    Con: 37.0% (+8.5)
    Lab: 36.5% (-22.7)
    Grn: 16.3% (+16.3)
    LDem: 7.5% (-4.0)
    UKIP: 2.7% (+2.7)

    It was a double vacancy.
    1 Con and 1 Lab elected.
    Defence was 1 Lab (elected in 2016) and 1 Green (elected in 2019)

    In 2019 it was Green 24.8 Lab 24.7 Con 19.3 UKIP 18.7
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    So how far back in the mists of time will Justin have to go to spin this?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited May 2021

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    I'm more working class than Owen Jones.
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580
    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,067
    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    More likely Count Binface ...
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    When did we last have a single Mum prime minister from Stockport?

    I appreciate Stockport is considerably nicer than Moss Side, but Rayner is no Etonian. It would be nice to have an actual working class Brit with a poor and difficult background, in number 10. Someone who doesn’t feel entitled to the job. Refreshing

    Image-wise, this is where Labour needs to go, even if Rayner isn’t The One
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    "Grew up in Stockport? Luxury!"
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125
    edited May 2021

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    How many transfers does Khan get? Not a vast number I would guess. Probably enough though.

    Seismic for him to lose London. Literally, unthinkable. Unless the capital has had an influx of a couple of million Hong Kong soft furnishings salesmen.....
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967
    Turnout around 50% for Hartlepool. Not bad.
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,288
    Hartlepool turnout over 50%.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    Over 50% turnout in Hartlepool. Just under 58% in the 2019 election.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited May 2021
    RobD said:

    Turnout around 50% for Hartlepool. Not bad.

    5...4...3....2....1...somebody on twitter claims it would have been higher but Boris personally killed 25% of the electorate there.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    How many transfers does Khan get? Not a vast number I would guess. Probably enough though.

    Seismic for him to lose London. Literally, unthinkable. Unless the capital has had an influx of a couple of million Hong Kong soft furnishings salesmen.....
    Kahn isn't going to lose London.

  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    That's provincial compared to North London.
    She is OK, but I don't listen to her and hear small town Britain. She sounds just like the city dwelling middle class activist types I know across the UK, who don't know anyone who votes Tory or voted for Brexit. The anger she shows and that of the people trying to cancel Brexit sound the same to me There is a disconnect between the evidence (votes) and their experience (twitter and friendship bubble) which means they cannot hear. This is fundamental to Labours current problems.
    She’s really not middle class. She’s echt working class. A single Mum from a Stockport comp with no GCSEs who made it to MP and deputy leader? That’s admirable, however you spin it

    But this Palestine stuff is depressing, however righteous. They all get captured by this
    Of course she's middle class. Unless she still lives on the estate. She will now live a middle class life unrelated to her previous experience growing up.
  • Options
    CursingStoneCursingStone Posts: 421

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    How many transfers does Khan get? Not a vast number I would guess. Probably enough though.

    Seismic for him to lose London. Literally, unthinkable. Unless the capital has had an influx of a couple of million Hong Kong soft furnishings salesmen.....
    Do Hong Kong British passports overseas holders get the automatic right to vote like commonwealth citizens?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125
    Hartlepool turnout north of 50%.....
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Floater said:

    So how far back in the mists of time will Justin have to go to spin this?

    I hear the 1741 elections showed a similar pattern....
    Actually an impressive increase in Labour support in 2021 compared with 1741.
  • Options
    MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,442
    edited May 2021

    Nunu3 said:

    The problem is not the leader of Labour, as I've said before, its that Labour is a fundamentally broken institution, with an appeal that is too narrow.

    I'm not sure the appeal is too much of a problem but the demography is now v-unfavourable.

    Is this the Cummings effect: pushing the conservatives to grasp the disenfranchised lower-middle incomes?
    Part Cummings; part Boris. Broken record mode ON. Boris won in 2019 by running on Labour's 2017 platform.

    So why vote Labour in 2021? More nurses? More infrastructure spending? More investment up north? You can get all those from Boris.

    I suppose the Labour party will have to grin and bear it for the foreseeable.

    For me this is what happens when you loose your party's base through triangulation. Its just that the home counties are yet to feel the political alienation of the northern small towners.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967

    Floater said:

    So how far back in the mists of time will Justin have to go to spin this?

    I hear the 1741 elections showed a similar pattern....
    Actually an impressive increase in Labour support in 2021 compared with 1741.
    Infinite, some might say.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    edited May 2021
    Bar Pool (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 55.8% (+26.3)
    Lab: 32.7% (-13.8)
    Grn: 8.2% (+3.2)
    Ind: 3.3% (+3.3)

    No UKIP (-17.5) as prev.

    Con GAIN from Lab

    Con gain council from NOC
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215

    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    That's provincial compared to North London.
    She is OK, but I don't listen to her and hear small town Britain. She sounds just like the city dwelling middle class activist types I know across the UK, who don't know anyone who votes Tory or voted for Brexit. The anger she shows and that of the people trying to cancel Brexit sound the same to me There is a disconnect between the evidence (votes) and their experience (twitter and friendship bubble) which means they cannot hear. This is fundamental to Labours current problems.
    She’s really not middle class. She’s echt working class. A single Mum from a Stockport comp with no GCSEs who made it to MP and deputy leader? That’s admirable, however you spin it

    But this Palestine stuff is depressing, however righteous. They all get captured by this
    Of course she's middle class. Unless she still lives on the estate. She will now live a middle class life unrelated to her previous experience growing up.

    Absurd. She left school at 16 with no qualifications, and pregnant. Her mother could not read or write.

    She has fought through all this to become deputy leader of Labour. It is an inspirational story. She is not middle class. She’s working class but ambitious. This is exactly the ‘kind’ of leader that Labour needs, even if she is not the one herself, in the end

    Labour needs to try something very new.
  • Options
    CursingStoneCursingStone Posts: 421
    Is the West Yorkshire mayoral election now in play for the cons?
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580
    RobD said:

    Floater said:

    So how far back in the mists of time will Justin have to go to spin this?

    I hear the 1741 elections showed a similar pattern....
    Actually an impressive increase in Labour support in 2021 compared with 1741.
    Infinite, some might say.
    Not really. Just take tonight's numbers from where-ever, then subtract zero?

    Perhaps I could prepare a series of bar graphs!
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    "Grew up in Stockport? Luxury!"
    Where I grew up was just as good if not slightly better, it just winds me up that in the great story of Labour that somehow Stockport is massively deprived. If you asked anyone from the North West to list the worst areas it would be a long time until they got to Stockport.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    How many transfers does Khan get? Not a vast number I would guess. Probably enough though.

    Seismic for him to lose London. Literally, unthinkable. Unless the capital has had an influx of a couple of million Hong Kong soft furnishings salesmen.....
    Do Hong Kong British passports overseas holders get the automatic right to vote like commonwealth citizens?
    If not, they soon will.....
  • Options
    MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,442

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    edited May 2021

    Is the West Yorkshire mayoral election now in play for the cons?

    It will be close, but Lab are definite favourites. I think that I got a ridiculously good value loser by betting on a Con win there.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    How many transfers does Khan get? Not a vast number I would guess. Probably enough though.

    Seismic for him to lose London. Literally, unthinkable. Unless the capital has had an influx of a couple of million Hong Kong soft furnishings salesmen.....
    Do Hong Kong British passports overseas holders get the automatic right to vote like commonwealth citizens?
    If not, they soon will.....
    They should.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,639
    "Bar Pool (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 55.8% (+26.3)
    Lab: 32.7% (-13.8)
    Grn: 8.2% (+3.2)
    Ind: 3.3% (+3.3)

    No UKIP (-17.5) as prev.

    Con GAIN from Lab"

    https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1390473482509721600
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
  • Options
    CursingStoneCursingStone Posts: 421
    RobD said:

    Imagine if Shaun Bailey somehow wins.
    How many transfers does Khan get? Not a vast number I would guess. Probably enough though.

    Seismic for him to lose London. Literally, unthinkable. Unless the capital has had an influx of a couple of million Hong Kong soft furnishings salesmen.....
    Do Hong Kong British passports overseas holders get the automatic right to vote like commonwealth citizens?
    If not, they soon will.....
    They should.
    https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/running-electoral-registration-england/eligibility-register-vote/what-are-nationality-requirements-register-vote/can-a-citizen-british-overseas-territories-register-vote
    Looks like it.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited May 2021
    And the Labour leader from a council in the West Midlands is banging on about Boris wallpaper, and the NHS the NHS the NHS the NHS.....

    What about the stuff you actually control, the bins, the street lights, etc. What are you going to be doing about this.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,639
    "Britain Elects
    @BritainElects
    Arbury (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 67.4% (+24.6)
    Lab: 25.7% (-9.5)
    Grn: 5.4% (-)
    Ind: 1.4% (+1.4)

    No UKIP (-15.2)

    Con HOLD"

    https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1390474851308167172
  • Options
    CursingStoneCursingStone Posts: 421

    And the Labour leader from a council in the West Midlands is banging on about Boris wallpaper, and the NHS the NHS the NHS the NHS.....

    What about the stuff you actually control, the bins, the street lights, etc. What are you going to be doing about this.

    Is that the guy who in one sentence said we are both in the middle of the pandemic and at the end of it ?
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,395

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125
    Andy_JS said:

    "Britain Elects
    @BritainElects
    Arbury (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 67.4% (+24.6)
    Lab: 25.7% (-9.5)
    Grn: 5.4% (-)
    Ind: 1.4% (+1.4)

    No UKIP (-15.2)

    Con HOLD"

    https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1390474851308167172

    17-20% swings Lab --> Con so far.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Did he? I thought it has been alleged that he was rather keen on using his charity as a personal piggy bank.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125
    Be astonished if Andy Street doesn't hold on.
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    "Grew up in Stockport? Luxury!"
    Where I grew up was just as good if not slightly better, it just winds me up that in the great story of Labour that somehow Stockport is massively deprived. If you asked anyone from the North West to list the worst areas it would be a long time until they got to Stockport.
    Was just joking. But of course everything is relative.

    Personally grew up in (what was then) a reasonably prosperous corner of a pretty depressed state (even then), West Virginia.

    From point of view of an upscale suburb, my county would appear like Dogpatch. But from perspective of a TRULY impoverished area, would look like a little slice of heaven.

    Which is why many left the true back of beyond to relocate there, back in the day (1955 to 1985)
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,298

    Be astonished if Andy Street doesn't hold on.

    Maybe the question should be will Starmer resign
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,067

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    "Grew up in Stockport? Luxury!"
    Where I grew up was just as good if not slightly better, it just winds me up that in the great story of Labour that somehow Stockport is massively deprived. If you asked anyone from the North West to list the worst areas it would be a long time until they got to Stockport.
    Was just joking. But of course everything is relative.

    Personally grew up in (what was then) a reasonably prosperous corner of a pretty depressed state (even then), West Virginia.

    From point of view of an upscale suburb, my county would appear like Dogpatch. But from perspective of a TRULY impoverished area, would look like a little slice of heaven.

    Which is why many left the true back of beyond to relocate there, back in the day (1955 to 1985)
    Is Dogpatch used as an expression? I only know it as an area of San Francisco.
  • Options
    AberjeffreyAberjeffrey Posts: 20
    Andy_JS said:

    "Britain Elects
    @BritainElects
    Arbury (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 67.4% (+24.6)
    Lab: 25.7% (-9.5)
    Grn: 5.4% (-)
    Ind: 1.4% (+1.4)

    No UKIP (-15.2)

    Con HOLD"

    https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1390474851308167172

    Some of these are just mad, 67%? 👌
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Don't bet on it! Secret of his "success" is to ALWAYS let somebody else pick up the tab, one way or another.

    Always.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.
  • Options
    CursingStoneCursingStone Posts: 421

    Andy_JS said:

    "Britain Elects
    @BritainElects
    Arbury (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 67.4% (+24.6)
    Lab: 25.7% (-9.5)
    Grn: 5.4% (-)
    Ind: 1.4% (+1.4)

    No UKIP (-15.2)

    Con HOLD"

    https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1390474851308167172

    17-20% swings Lab --> Con so far.
    What if it’s better than expected for cons everywhere? A few percent transform number of seat in Scotland!
  • Options
    MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,442

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    I suppose the party is just further beholden to the man.

    Not knowing anything about Republican machinations I was assuming one of the acolytes was in with a chance, Pompeo in particular. but could a Trump be on the ticket 2024?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Is that Starmer has to go territory?
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,395

    Nunu3 said:

    The problem is not the leader of Labour, as I've said before, its that Labour is a fundamentally broken institution, with an appeal that is too narrow.

    I'm not sure the appeal is too much of a problem but the demography is now v-unfavourable.

    Is this the Cummings effect: pushing the conservatives to grasp the disenfranchised lower-middle incomes?
    Part Cummings; part Boris. Broken record mode ON. Boris won in 2019 by running on Labour's 2017 platform.

    So why vote Labour in 2021? More nurses? More infrastructure spending? More investment up north? You can get all those from Boris.

    I suppose the Labour party will have to grin and bear it for the foreseeable.

    For me this is what happens when you loose your party's base through triangulation. Its just that the home counties are yet to feel the political alienation of the northern small towners.
    Theresa May spoke about the JAMs who had lost out under Cameron. Just About Managing. Maybe those small-C conservative JAMs are the Tory equivalent of Labour's lost voters left behind.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967
    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967

    Andy_JS said:

    "Britain Elects
    @BritainElects
    Arbury (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result:

    Con: 67.4% (+24.6)
    Lab: 25.7% (-9.5)
    Grn: 5.4% (-)
    Ind: 1.4% (+1.4)

    No UKIP (-15.2)

    Con HOLD"

    https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1390474851308167172

    17-20% swings Lab --> Con so far.
    What if it’s better than expected for cons everywhere? A few percent transform number of seat in Scotland!
    Ross next FM? Who had a bet on that?
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,288
    With results like this, Boris can surely get away with literally anything.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215
    Nuneaton was strongly LEAVE

    The brexiteer hobbits are coming out for Gandalf the White-hair
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    She has a remarkable back story



    ‘Rayner was born in Stockport, where she attended the state secondary Avondale School. She left school aged 16 whilst pregnant and without any qualifications. She later trained in social care, eventually becoming a trade union representative within Unison, during which time she joined the Labour Party. Selected to contest Ashton-under-Lyne in 2014, Rayner was elected for the seat at the 2015 general election.’

    Good for her
    Absolutely good for her. But having grown up about 10 miles away I don't see Stockport as that bad, not compared to moss side, cheatham hill, or going out to Oldham or Rochdale.

    Same goes for Owen Jones grew up in Stockport both parents working one as a lecturer. Its not the worst place in the world.
    "Grew up in Stockport? Luxury!"
    Where I grew up was just as good if not slightly better, it just winds me up that in the great story of Labour that somehow Stockport is massively deprived. If you asked anyone from the North West to list the worst areas it would be a long time until they got to Stockport.
    Was just joking. But of course everything is relative.

    Personally grew up in (what was then) a reasonably prosperous corner of a pretty depressed state (even then), West Virginia.

    From point of view of an upscale suburb, my county would appear like Dogpatch. But from perspective of a TRULY impoverished area, would look like a little slice of heaven.

    Which is why many left the true back of beyond to relocate there, back in the day (1955 to 1985)
    Is Dogpatch used as an expression? I only know it as an area of San Francisco.
    Dogpatch is from the classic US comix strip "Li'l Abner" it was hillbilly heaven, presumably somewhere in deepest, darkest Appalachia.

    In words of creator Andy Capp:

    Dogpatch was "an average stone-age community nestled in a bleak valley, between two cheap and uninteresting hills somewhere." The inhabitants were mostly lazy hillbillies, who usually wanted nothing to do with progress. Li'l Abner's backwater hometown chiefly consisted of dismal log cabin hovels, pine trees, “tarnip” fields and hog wallows—and was often referred to by its inhabitants and outsiders as being the most miserable and unnecessary place on earth. The menfolk were too lazy to work, yet Dogpatch gals were desperate enough to chase them (see Sadie Hawkins Day). Those who farmed their turnip fields watched Turnip Termites swarm by the billions once a year, locust-like, to devour Dogpatch's only crop (along with their livestock and all their clothing.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogpatch
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580
    MikeL said:

    With results like this, Boris can surely get away with literally anything.

    Don't tempt him!
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,288
    Camp Hill (Nuneaton and Bedworth) council result

    Con: 53.1% (+35.3)
    Lab: 33.0% (-15.7)
    Grn: 10.9% (+5.6)
    Oth: 3.0% (-)

    No UKIP (-25.3)

    Con GAIN from Lab
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    Sky just said that they're hearing likely 4,000 to 5,000 majority in Hartlepool, which is consistent with ~15pts
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,288
    These Nuneaton results are a total annihilation.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Is that Starmer has to go territory?
    If Con gain WYorks Mayor, I think so.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Sky were reporting that Labour think Oldham has gone badly.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995
    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215
    MikeL said:

    With results like this, Boris can surely get away with literally anything.

    Wait. It’s just Leave areas so far

    However, this may not be a problem for Bojo. My guess is Leave voters are rewarding him for seeing thru Brexit, and respecting British democracy. At the same time Remainers are apathetic and split, multiple ways. So he wins
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,395

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Did he? I thought it has been alleged that he was rather keen on using his charity as a personal piggy bank.
    Donald Trump's Louis XIVth apartment is truly, erm, remarkable.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns5bMU4bYKc
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited May 2021
    I don't know if it was a benefit or not for Labour to have Starmer wasting his time in places like Bath arguing with a nutter during the campaign.
  • Options
    MightyAlexMightyAlex Posts: 1,442

    Nunu3 said:

    The problem is not the leader of Labour, as I've said before, its that Labour is a fundamentally broken institution, with an appeal that is too narrow.

    I'm not sure the appeal is too much of a problem but the demography is now v-unfavourable.

    Is this the Cummings effect: pushing the conservatives to grasp the disenfranchised lower-middle incomes?
    Part Cummings; part Boris. Broken record mode ON. Boris won in 2019 by running on Labour's 2017 platform.

    So why vote Labour in 2021? More nurses? More infrastructure spending? More investment up north? You can get all those from Boris.

    I suppose the Labour party will have to grin and bear it for the foreseeable.

    For me this is what happens when you loose your party's base through triangulation. Its just that the home counties are yet to feel the political alienation of the northern small towners.
    Theresa May spoke about the JAMs who had lost out under Cameron. Just About Managing. Maybe those small-C conservative JAMs are the Tory equivalent of Labour's lost voters left behind.
    And a good proportion will be having to fund the cladding work on their mis-sold high rises.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967
    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Isn't that a bit of a shock? It wasn't a guarantee that all of the UKIP votes would go Blue.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125
    Leon said:

    Nuneaton was strongly LEAVE

    The brexiteer hobbits are coming out for Gandalf the White-hair

    No no no - we keep hearing on this very site that he is the Bal-rogerer.....
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Is that Starmer has to go territory?
    No.

    (1) There's no obvious and credible replacement
    (2) There's no mechanism
    (3) A new leader doesn't solve the fundamental strategic challenges Labour has

    Plus:

    (4) Tomorrow and the weekend will be better days for Labour. This evening, this is Red Wall Thursday, where we saw from 2019 that Labour was getting absolutely hammered. Most of these results are just the trends from last GE confirmed. By contrast Labour will do better in metropolitan areas and Scotland than previously.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,067
    edited May 2021
    RobD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Isn't that a bit of a shock? It wasn't a guarantee that all of the UKIP votes would go Blue.
    Owen Jones made that point. It went wrong for Labour post 2017.

    "@OwenJones84
    This denialism is the problem.

    UKIP's vote was higher in Hartlepool in 2015 than the Brexit Party was in 2019.

    But in 2017, UKIP's collapse boosted Labour and won it over half the vote.

    Why can't Labour pull the same trick with Brexit voters today?"


    https://twitter.com/OwenJones84/status/1390423898504708105
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,395

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Don't bet on it! Secret of his "success" is to ALWAYS let somebody else pick up the tab, one way or another.

    Always.
    Since Trump was paying no tax and stiffing most of his contractors...
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    I suppose the party is just further beholden to the man.

    Not knowing anything about Republican machinations I was assuming one of the acolytes was in with a chance, Pompeo in particular. but could a Trump be on the ticket 2024?
    Pompeo is NOT a hot prospect, though he'd like to be. De Santis is currently leading the rabid Republican pack.

    Trumpsky do a Grover Cleveland? Or try to?

    My guess is that The Donald would rather be Kingmaker than Kingfish = POTUS.

    Been there, done that.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995
    RobD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Isn't that a bit of a shock? It wasn't a guarantee that all of the UKIP votes would go Blue.
    Yes: I assumed than 60% of UKIP/BXP would go to Con, 20% would go Lab, and 20% would stay home. So it's a big move towards Con.
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    That's provincial compared to North London.
    She is OK, but I don't listen to her and hear small town Britain. She sounds just like the city dwelling middle class activist types I know across the UK, who don't know anyone who votes Tory or voted for Brexit. The anger she shows and that of the people trying to cancel Brexit sound the same to me There is a disconnect between the evidence (votes) and their experience (twitter and friendship bubble) which means they cannot hear. This is fundamental to Labours current problems.
    She’s really not middle class. She’s echt working class. A single Mum from a Stockport comp with no GCSEs who made it to MP and deputy leader? That’s admirable, however you spin it

    But this Palestine stuff is depressing, however righteous. They all get captured by this
    Of course she's middle class. Unless she still lives on the estate. She will now live a middle class life unrelated to her previous experience growing up.

    Absurd. She left school at 16 with no qualifications, and pregnant. Her mother could not read or write.

    She has fought through all this to become deputy leader of Labour. It is an inspirational story. She is not middle class. She’s working class but ambitious. This is exactly the ‘kind’ of leader that Labour needs, even if she is not the one herself, in the end

    Labour needs to try something very new.
    Through the poor character of Brown and Corbyn, rivals were torpedoed. This is the result - trying something new rather than trying something popular or electable
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Don't bet on it! Secret of his "success" is to ALWAYS let somebody else pick up the tab, one way or another.

    Always.
    Since Trump was paying no tax and stiffing most of his contractors...
    Just the tip of the rotten iceberg.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Did he? I thought it has been alleged that he was rather keen on using his charity as a personal piggy bank.
    Donald Trump's Louis XIVth apartment is truly, erm, remarkable.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns5bMU4bYKc
    Is that Piers Morgan?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125

    I don't know if it was a benefit or not for Labour to have Starmer wasting his time in places like Bath arguing with a nutter during the campaign.

    Well, it amused me...
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Did he? I thought it has been alleged that he was rather keen on using his charity as a personal piggy bank.
    Donald Trump's Louis XIVth apartment is truly, erm, remarkable.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns5bMU4bYKc
    Classic Turkish whorehouse. Of course whorehouses being a old Trump family tradition.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Trump
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Just on the number from last time 5k majority and on on decreased turnout less. The worry for labour must be what is seen elsewhere - Tories not just picking up bxt party but exceeding it
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215
    rcs1000 said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Is that Starmer has to go territory?
    No.

    (1) There's no obvious and credible replacement
    (2) There's no mechanism
    (3) A new leader doesn't solve the fundamental strategic challenges Labour has

    Plus:

    (4) Tomorrow and the weekend will be better days for Labour. This evening, this is Red Wall Thursday, where we saw from 2019 that Labour was getting absolutely hammered. Most of these results are just the trends from last GE confirmed. By contrast Labour will do better in metropolitan areas and Scotland than previously.
    Not at all sure they will do better in Scotland. Mood music suggests a polarizing tendency behind the Nats and the Tories
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Did he? I thought it has been alleged that he was rather keen on using his charity as a personal piggy bank.
    Yes, but at least it was his own charity.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,639
    The way things are going, I'd be more concerned about Andy Burnham and Sadiq Khan than I would about the likes of Andy Street in the West Midlands.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995

    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Just on the number from last time 5k majority and on on decreased turnout less. The worry for labour must be what is seen elsewhere - Tories not just picking up bxt party but exceeding it
    I forecast Con 13k vs 11.5k for Lab. I think my Lab number will only be slightly out, but Cons will be around 16-17k.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    Greenstead (Colchester) council result:

    Lab: 52.0% (+12.3)
    Con: 28.4% (+10.5)
    LDem: 10.5% (-2.9)
    Grn: 6.4% (-0.3)
    Oth: 2.7% (+1.3)

    No UKIP (-14.6) as prev.

    Lab HOLD
    More:

    Now this is more interesting. Still not amazing for Labour.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215
    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Isn't that a bit of a shock? It wasn't a guarantee that all of the UKIP votes would go Blue.
    Yes: I assumed than 60% of UKIP/BXP would go to Con, 20% would go Lab, and 20% would stay home. So it's a big move towards Con.
    I recall when received opinion said ‘these voters may go BXP or UKIP, they will never go Tory’. Oops
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,995
    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Is that Starmer has to go territory?
    No.

    (1) There's no obvious and credible replacement
    (2) There's no mechanism
    (3) A new leader doesn't solve the fundamental strategic challenges Labour has

    Plus:

    (4) Tomorrow and the weekend will be better days for Labour. This evening, this is Red Wall Thursday, where we saw from 2019 that Labour was getting absolutely hammered. Most of these results are just the trends from last GE confirmed. By contrast Labour will do better in metropolitan areas and Scotland than previously.
    Not at all sure they will do better in Scotland. Mood music suggests a polarizing tendency behind the Nats and the Tories
    I think Cons will lose seats in Scotland, while Labour will stand still. I think it's entirely possible Labour will be back in second place in Scotland.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,395

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Brom said:

    Has any opposition leader had a poor first election and gone on to win a general election? I believe Thatcher, Blair and Cameron all did rather well (and I can’t be arsed to trawl further back than that).

    I would imagine it’s an ominous sign, if you’re associated with being a loser early on it becomes hard to shake that label.

    They might have to go the full Angela Rayner. Provincial working class giantess.

    If that doesn’t work, disband
    They need someone who gets the modern provincial working class. Starmer seems to have a caricature in his head from the 1970s.
    Yes exactly. I think a white provincial working class woman like Rayner could work well. She’s not to everyone’s taste, but nor is Boris, and he’s doing OK

    It is the obvious next move. After that, I run out of potential moves for Labour

    Without Scotland, perhaps they are simply finished
    But Rayner is not provincial. She is from Manchester.
    That's provincial compared to North London.
    She is OK, but I don't listen to her and hear small town Britain. She sounds just like the city dwelling middle class activist types I know across the UK, who don't know anyone who votes Tory or voted for Brexit. The anger she shows and that of the people trying to cancel Brexit sound the same to me There is a disconnect between the evidence (votes) and their experience (twitter and friendship bubble) which means they cannot hear. This is fundamental to Labours current problems.
    She’s really not middle class. She’s echt working class. A single Mum from a Stockport comp with no GCSEs who made it to MP and deputy leader? That’s admirable, however you spin it

    But this Palestine stuff is depressing, however righteous. They all get captured by this
    Of course she's middle class. Unless she still lives on the estate. She will now live a middle class life unrelated to her previous experience growing up.

    Absurd. She left school at 16 with no qualifications, and pregnant. Her mother could not read or write.

    She has fought through all this to become deputy leader of Labour. It is an inspirational story. She is not middle class. She’s working class but ambitious. This is exactly the ‘kind’ of leader that Labour needs, even if she is not the one herself, in the end

    Labour needs to try something very new.
    Through the poor character of Brown and Corbyn, rivals were torpedoed. This is the result - trying something new rather than trying something popular or electable
    That is not really true. Gordon Brown's Cabinet was stuffed with Labour's big beasts and rivals. Nor did Jeremy Corbyn banish the rebels: rather, they self-isolated by refusing to serve.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215
    Better for Labour


    Old Heath and The Hythe (Colchester) council result:

    Lab: 53.3% (+13.1)
    Con: 26.6% (+11.1)
    Grn: 10.9% (-5.2)
    LDem: 9.1% (-17.6)

    Lab HOLD
    More:
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,395
    RobD said:

    Meanwhile back at the ranch . . .

    Politico.com - MAGA world pans [US Rep Elise] Stefanik
    Donald Trump’s populist base has serious issues with the New York congresswoman who’s poised to replace Rep. Liz Cheney.

    . . . Within minutes of Trump’s endorsement of the New York congresswoman for GOP conference chair on Wednesday, top MAGA voices erupted in anger — a rare break with the former president. The invective aimed at Stefanik, who was perceived to be insufficiently conservative and a relative newcomer to the Trump cause, continued to zoom through the MAGA-sphere on Thursday. . . .

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/06/elise-stefanik-maga-trump-485584

    Do you think Trump is expecting inducements for his patronage?
    Doubt it. Not because he wouldn't IF he needed the money. But right now he's raking it in from the MAGA maniacs, and of course raking his personal cut off the top (expenses, you know).
    Say what you like about Donald Trump, at least he paid for his own gold wallpaper.
    Did he? I thought it has been alleged that he was rather keen on using his charity as a personal piggy bank.
    Donald Trump's Louis XIVth apartment is truly, erm, remarkable.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns5bMU4bYKc
    Is that Piers Morgan?
    An early series of The Apprentice where the contestants were invited for dinner.
  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,639
    "Shlomo.
    @hapoelorient
    I agree with the #StarmerOut campaign but frankly getting rid of him is not enough. Rather we need an almost total clearout of "Centrist" MPs in the Party who are only in politics for their own career and spend more life going after the Left than holding the Tories to account."

    https://twitter.com/hapoelorient/status/1390478650621906944
  • Options
    SeaShantyIrish2SeaShantyIrish2 Posts: 15,580
    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    RobD said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Gadzooks.
    To be fair, we're seeing Cons hoovering up the UKIP/BXP vote everywhere, which would be consistent with a victory of that margin in Hartlepool.
    Isn't that a bit of a shock? It wasn't a guarantee that all of the UKIP votes would go Blue.
    Yes: I assumed than 60% of UKIP/BXP would go to Con, 20% would go Lab, and 20% would stay home. So it's a big move towards Con.
    I recall when received opinion said ‘these voters may go BXP or UKIP, they will never go Tory’. Oops
    Halfway house. For recovering Labour legacy voters. Who've now completed their 12-step program.
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311

    Nunu3 said:

    The problem is not the leader of Labour, as I've said before, its that Labour is a fundamentally broken institution, with an appeal that is too narrow.

    I'm not sure the appeal is too much of a problem but the demography is now v-unfavourable.

    Is this the Cummings effect: pushing the conservatives to grasp the disenfranchised lower-middle incomes?
    Part Cummings; part Boris. Broken record mode ON. Boris won in 2019 by running on Labour's 2017 platform.

    So why vote Labour in 2021? More nurses? More infrastructure spending? More investment up north? You can get all those from Boris.

    I suppose the Labour party will have to grin and bear it for the foreseeable.

    For me this is what happens when you loose your party's base through triangulation. Its just that the home counties are yet to feel the political alienation of the northern small towners.
    Theresa May spoke about the JAMs who had lost out under Cameron. Just About Managing. Maybe those small-C conservative JAMs are the Tory equivalent of Labour's lost voters left behind.
    And a good proportion will be having to fund the cladding work on their mis-sold high rises.
    Good proportion?!? Well below 1% will be affected
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,215
    rcs1000 said:

    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Chameleon said:

    Wow, seen someone semi-credible on twitter claiming that they think that Con wins Hartlepool by 20pts.

    Is that Starmer has to go territory?
    No.

    (1) There's no obvious and credible replacement
    (2) There's no mechanism
    (3) A new leader doesn't solve the fundamental strategic challenges Labour has

    Plus:

    (4) Tomorrow and the weekend will be better days for Labour. This evening, this is Red Wall Thursday, where we saw from 2019 that Labour was getting absolutely hammered. Most of these results are just the trends from last GE confirmed. By contrast Labour will do better in metropolitan areas and Scotland than previously.
    Not at all sure they will do better in Scotland. Mood music suggests a polarizing tendency behind the Nats and the Tories
    I think Cons will lose seats in Scotland, while Labour will stand still. I think it's entirely possible Labour will be back in second place in Scotland.
    The very last polls show Labour 3rd, definitely. And excited tweets since have come from Tories and Nats, not lab (mainly excited by turnout). We shall see
This discussion has been closed.