Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Biden way ahead in tonight’s four big primaries

12346»

Comments

  • BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,492
    eadric said:

    Rumours still sweeping Twitter that lockdown commences as early as Thursday.

    Before this is over there will be lots of rummer on Twitter,
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767
    Amazon is suspending shipments of nonessential items to its warehouses in the United States and United Kingdom following shortages triggered by the coronavirus outbreak.

    "We are seeing increased online shopping and as a result some products such as household staples and medical supplies are out of stock," a spokesperson for the online retail giant said in a statement to The Hill Tuesday. "With this in mind, we are temporarily prioritizing household staples, medical supplies and other high-demand products coming into our fulfillment centers so we can more quickly receive, restock and ship these products to customers."

    The freeze will be effective from Tuesday through April 5, according to Amazon, although an extension has not been ruled out.

    (The Hill)
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    Actually you can do a heck of a lot on a ZX81, very much doubt you "wore out the possibilities" in a week!! Still have no idea how 3D Monster Maze worked on that thing (though admittedly it didn't fit on 1 kB, needed the memory expansion).
    It was way too limiting. I was at the start of my programming career and I needed a machine with halfway decent capabilities and more than one programming language. I had BCPL as well as BBC Pascal. BCPL was fun.

    Nowadays, after a couple of decades, I have used more programming languages than enough. I always had a bit of a soft spot for System/36 OCL... :D
    I learned to program in Cobol, PL/I and Assembler on an IBM System/360 running OS/360, release 16. Yup, that long ago.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    eadric said:

    RobD said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Because when they go back to their house with Grandpa Eadric they'd probably kill him.
    It is a serious question. The world is already skewed in terms of wealth, property, assets in favour of the old.

    And now a nineteen year is being expected not to go out.

    Maybe that is just about fine for a couple of weeks, but for two years, or more?

    What has Grandpa Eadric ever done for the young ?

    I recollect he was a pretty selfish, hard-partying bastard when he was young.
    Well lots of old people are about to DIE, so maybe the world is rebalancing itself. And that's maybe a good thing. Albeit a bit tough on those that cop a particularly nasty death.

    That's what bugs me about this bug. It's a really bad way to go. Drowning in your own lung fluid, over two days, alone in a ward full of other people dying, with no relatives of friends around, holding an iPad to say goodbye to everyone (that's what they do in Italian hospitals). The disease cruelly keeps you lucid to the bitter end.

    And then they take your corpse and it is rapidly burned in Corpse Burning Unit 956XF, with no proper funeral.

    Christ. I'd rather die at home of heroin. Ta v much.
    if you described pretty much any illness in literal detail like that it would sound as scary.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,720
    .
    Tim_B said:

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    Actually you can do a heck of a lot on a ZX81, very much doubt you "wore out the possibilities" in a week!! Still have no idea how 3D Monster Maze worked on that thing (though admittedly it didn't fit on 1 kB, needed the memory expansion).
    It was way too limiting. I was at the start of my programming career and I needed a machine with halfway decent capabilities and more than one programming language. I had BCPL as well as BBC Pascal. BCPL was fun.

    Nowadays, after a couple of decades, I have used more programming languages than enough. I always had a bit of a soft spot for System/36 OCL... :D
    I learned to program in Cobol, PL/I and Assembler on an IBM System/360 running OS/360, release 16. Yup, that long ago.
    Did you hold the punched tape up to the light to see where you needed to debug?
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    https://twitter.com/BBCkatyaadler/status/1240040741927358465

    Not sure how that will be obeyed, if it is true.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,037



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
  • CatManCatMan Posts: 3,060
    edited March 2020
    BigRich said:

    BigRich said:

    BigRich said:

    Last week in my church the, the dioceses had invoked the 1542 Sacrament act, so that communion was given in just one kind (bread) and not wine so there was no need to use a shared chalices.

    It felt quite reassuring so how to know that this had been foreseen almost half a millennium ago.
    I dunno how many Catholics or Anglo-Catholics are In Da House tonight, but something I've wondered without knowing a lot about religious matters.

    What's the big objection to using individual Communion cups like the Baptists, Methodists, Reformed churches etc? This kind of kit always struck me as more hygienic - always found it a bit icky when watching Catholic/Anglican services with a shared cup, but I guess it depends what you grow up with as "normal".

    https://www.jmchurchsupplies.co.uk/product-category/communion-cups/

    https://www.jmchurchsupplies.co.uk/product-category/trays/
    I think is about the idea of 'communion' being 'communal', and therfore the sharing of a cup is part of that.

    but I suspect its also about maintaining a tradition because its 'normal' to each geration.

    Arguably as nobody shares a cup in normal life nowadays, (even when going to the pub in a virus Pandemic) its no longer holds the same symbolic value, which why newer denominations have not felt the ergeg to emulate that practice.
    Interesting point, I hadn't considered how culturally drinking from a shared container was a major part of life for thousands of years. Much the same principle as with a Viking drinking horn full of mead being passed around the table at a feast.
    The modern equivalents perhaps being passing a Joint or a 'crak' pipe, not my thing, but I understand the custom is to pass to the left, the same a bottle of port.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTTMXHrqwgo
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
  • Pro_Rata said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Actually, I agree with you.

    If I was 18 and desperate to get drunk and meet girls and have druggy fun, as I once was, how long would I tolerate sitting at home watching Netflix? Twonyears? No way.

    The government will have to play this aspect carefully.

    But Justin is 65 and it is inexcusable. Get home, have a biscuit, stop being a selfish arse.

    Incidentally, as I said I did see SOME people in pubs on my evening walk - and most were over 40, if not over 50. Maybe there is some truth in the boomer/Gen X accusation.
    I am glad you agree.

    There is no way 18 years olds are going to sit at home worrying about coronavirus transmission rates for 2 weeks -- let alone for however long this goes on for.

    And, I see their point of view. Why should they not dance and drink and screw?
    Because their parents might end up dead?
    If they're 18, their parents are probably 40-50. It is not a big risk.
    OK, their grandparents.
    Plenty of 40-50 years old are sending up on an ICU, plenty are being hospitalised with mild [sic] pneumonia. Who is to say this is not taking a significant lump of of their parents overall level of health, out of their remaining life expectancy.
    What are the practical actions we can do to reduce our chances of getting pneumonia, and if we get it stop it requiring hospitalisation?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,533
    edited March 2020
    geoffw said:



    Did you hold the punched tape up to the light to see where you needed to debug?

    yes!
  • MyBurningEarsMyBurningEars Posts: 3,651

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    Actually you can do a heck of a lot on a ZX81, very much doubt you "wore out the possibilities" in a week!! Still have no idea how 3D Monster Maze worked on that thing (though admittedly it didn't fit on 1 kB, needed the memory expansion).
    It was way too limiting. I was at the start of my programming career and I needed a machine with halfway decent capabilities and more than one programming language. I had BCPL as well as BBC Pascal. BCPL was fun.

    Nowadays, after a couple of decades, I have used more programming languages than enough. I always had a bit of a soft spot for System/36 OCL... :D
    I still miss WordBASIC... pretty similar to the QBASIC I'd learned back in the days of DOS but I found the ability to edit a Word document very powerful because I could use it for metaprogramming. I've always been really into algorithmic art, and if I copied e.g. some simple Logo code (or other graphical programming language) as my Word document I could then use a WordBASIC macro to perturb it or add some extra complexity. Was really annoyed when VBA came along with Word 97 and all my old code became useless :frowning:
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    For those in London, the Hawksmoor restaurants have closed and some of their staff let go.

    The first of many I suspect.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    RobD said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Because when they go back to their house with Grandpa Eadric they'd probably kill him.
    It is a serious question. The world is already skewed in terms of wealth, property, assets in favour of the old.

    And now a nineteen year is being expected not to go out.

    Maybe that is just about fine for a couple of weeks, but for two years, or more?

    What has Grandpa Eadric ever done for the young ?

    I recollect he was a pretty selfish, hard-partying bastard when he was young.
    Well lots of old people are about to DIE, so maybe the world is rebalancing itself. And that's maybe a good thing. Albeit a bit tough on those that cop a particularly nasty death.

    That's what bugs me about this bug. It's a really bad way to go. Drowning in your own lung fluid, over two days, alone in a ward full of other people dying, with no relatives of friends around, holding an iPad to say goodbye to everyone (that's what they do in Italian hospitals). The disease cruelly keeps you lucid to the bitter end.

    And then they take your corpse and it is rapidly burned in Corpse Burning Unit 956XF, with no proper funeral.

    Christ. I'd rather die at home of heroin. Ta v much.
    if you described pretty much any illness in literal detail like that it would sound as scary.
    Not true at all. Take cancer. Many cancer victims end up in a hospice where they are slowly euthanised with morphine. They gently drift away, submerged in opiates,a and hopefully their last vague memory is a blur of friendly, loving faces around the death-bed.

    This is really not like that.
    That does sound better!
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    For those in London, the Hawksmoor restaurants have closed and some of their staff let go.

    The first of many I suspect.

    Christ. They were good. Ace steaks.
    The last steak I ate, back in August
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    geoffw said:

    .

    Tim_B said:

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    Actually you can do a heck of a lot on a ZX81, very much doubt you "wore out the possibilities" in a week!! Still have no idea how 3D Monster Maze worked on that thing (though admittedly it didn't fit on 1 kB, needed the memory expansion).
    It was way too limiting. I was at the start of my programming career and I needed a machine with halfway decent capabilities and more than one programming language. I had BCPL as well as BBC Pascal. BCPL was fun.

    Nowadays, after a couple of decades, I have used more programming languages than enough. I always had a bit of a soft spot for System/36 OCL... :D
    I learned to program in Cobol, PL/I and Assembler on an IBM System/360 running OS/360, release 16. Yup, that long ago.
    Did you hold the punched tape up to the light to see where you needed to debug?
    No paper tape. We did have a data cell though! We even had a 1401 in the computer room for legacy programs.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Still like to know if deaths from influenza and pneumonia are up, down or steady this year
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,037
    Cyclefree said:

    For those in London, the Hawksmoor restaurants have closed and some of their staff let go.

    The first of many I suspect.

    I don’t understand why any bar or restaurant is still open. We've been told not to go, they should not be facilitating bad behaviour.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,570

    stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.

    I had a sudden vision of starchy home counties lasses scrubbing down Eadric with Dettol and stiff bristled brushes.
    You know he is going to be dreaming that every night now until this is over don't you. :)
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767
    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
    Who knows.
    Of course you can. How on earth would that be stopped?

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767
    Seems to be a gap over rent in all these plans.

    Slip up?

    Or another announcement due?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    For anyone who's into their retrocomputing, there's still a ZX81 demoscene!! Not as big as the Commodore/Amiga or Speccie demoscenes, but arguably even more hardcore. Anyone with fondish 80s/earlys 90s memories of the limitations of their Spectrum or C64 or Amiga 500 should browse the demoscene vids on Youtube. What the masters can get out of that hardware is incredible, and every now and then some new tricks come along.

    Bearing in mind the limitations of the ZX81, especially the fact it didn't originally come with a way to do "hi-res" i.e. pixel-by-pixel graphics (though ways around this have been found), the following demos are astonishing:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X92xvLlbnVg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKj6TaADFWo
    That is utterly outrageous. Jaw dropping. I frankly can't believe that.

    Brightened my day!
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,720
    Tim_B said:

    geoffw said:

    .

    Tim_B said:

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    Actually you can do a heck of a lot on a ZX81, very much doubt you "wore out the possibilities" in a week!! Still have no idea how 3D Monster Maze worked on that thing (though admittedly it didn't fit on 1 kB, needed the memory expansion).
    It was way too limiting. I was at the start of my programming career and I needed a machine with halfway decent capabilities and more than one programming language. I had BCPL as well as BBC Pascal. BCPL was fun.

    Nowadays, after a couple of decades, I have used more programming languages than enough. I always had a bit of a soft spot for System/36 OCL... :D
    I learned to program in Cobol, PL/I and Assembler on an IBM System/360 running OS/360, release 16. Yup, that long ago.
    Did you hold the punched tape up to the light to see where you needed to debug?
    No paper tape. We did have a data cell though! We even had a 1401 in the computer room for legacy programs.
    Ah! those were the days!
  • MyBurningEarsMyBurningEars Posts: 3,651
    theProle said:

    BigRich said:

    Last week in my church the, the dioceses had invoked the 1542 Sacrament act, so that communion was given in just one kind (bread) and not wine so there was no need to use a shared chalices.

    It felt quite reassuring so how to know that this had been foreseen almost half a millennium ago.
    I dunno how many Catholics or Anglo-Catholics are In Da House tonight, but something I've wondered without knowing a lot about religious matters.

    What's the big objection to using individual Communion cups like the Baptists, Methodists, Reformed churches etc? This kind of kit always struck me as more hygienic - always found it a bit icky when watching Catholic/Anglican services with a shared cup, but I guess it depends what you grow up with as "normal".

    https://www.jmchurchsupplies.co.uk/product-category/communion-cups/

    https://www.jmchurchsupplies.co.uk/product-category/trays/
    The individual cups comes from the tea-total movement - if you use non-alcholic communion wine, hygiene becomes more of an issue.
    In normal times, I think a shared cup is more appropriate for two reasons - first, the Bible doesn't say "And after supper he took the tray of little shot glasses and having given thanks gave to his disciples saying take one of these and drink it in remembrance of me." and secondly its a powerful picture of our unity in Christ - it's a pointer to all that we share as brothers and sisters in Christ.
    Ahh, that's an interesting perspective thanks. You're evangelical Anglican if I recall correctly so to some extent a foot in both camps (that is if you're the same theProle I know from chez Timmy's site?).

    If you are who I think you are then (1) please stick around and post more often, you post some really interesting stuff from what would be an unusual perspective on PB (well, stick around even if you aren't who I think you are!), (2) don't know if you spotted this downthread but this seemed absolutely your kind of thing...

    I was very proud when the boiler I built passed a rigorous safety test ( 300% of working pressure) by the Society of Model And Experimental Engineers boiler tester. He died a couple of weeks later - think he was 93.

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,225
    edited March 2020
    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    Not exactly right; there is a distinction between the advice for the at risk groups and others
    (though it is evolving still):
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-for-vulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-and-protecting-older-people-and-vulnerable-adults
    Everyone should be trying to follow these measures as much as is pragmatic.

    We strongly advise you to follow the above measures as much as you can and to significantly limit your face-to-face interaction with friends and family if possible, particularly if you:

    are over 70
    have an underlying health condition
    are pregnant
    This advice is likely to be in place for some weeks....


    But yes, social distancing is important for everyone to practice.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695
    edited March 2020
    Tim_B said:

    geoffw said:

    .

    Tim_B said:

    kingbongo said:

    kingbongo said:

    ...
    I honestly lose track of all these titles. I was born in 1965. Is that Baby Boomer? Or Gen X? I think I ought to know so I can behave accordingly.

    I was also born in 65 and would like a definitive ruling on this
    It appears that there is no definitive year. According to Wikipedia the crossover is somewhere between 1960 and 1965.

    "Generation X (or Gen X for short) is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. Researchers and popular media typically use birth years around 1965 to 1980 to define Generation Xers, although some sources use birth years beginning as early as 1960 and ending somewhere from 1977 to 1984."
    Gen X birth year 1964 to 1981 for our company’s stats etc.
    That sounds official enough for me - I read Douglas Coupland novels and learned to program on a Research Machines Z80 so maybe proto-Gen X rather than full on
    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.
    Actually you can do a heck of a lot on a ZX81, very much doubt you "wore out the possibilities" in a week!! Still have no idea how 3D Monster Maze worked on that thing (though admittedly it didn't fit on 1 kB, needed the memory expansion).
    It was way too limiting. I was at the start of my programming career and I needed a machine with halfway decent capabilities and more than one programming language. I had BCPL as well as BBC Pascal. BCPL was fun.

    Nowadays, after a couple of decades, I have used more programming languages than enough. I always had a bit of a soft spot for System/36 OCL... :D
    I learned to program in Cobol, PL/I and Assembler on an IBM System/360 running OS/360, release 16. Yup, that long ago.
    Did you hold the punched tape up to the light to see where you needed to debug?
    No paper tape. We did have a data cell though! We even had a 1401 in the computer room for legacy programs.
    COBOL on an ICL 1900 for me back in 1981. Coding sheets, punch cards with no automatic sequencing (don't drop the deck before first compiliation!), 16kb module limit, 6 bit characters, 24 bit words, 8,388,608 was the largest value you could hold in a single word computational field...

    Ah, those were the days!
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    isam said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
    So work goes on then but no socialising. Is that it? Is the government closing all shops / restaurants then? And who defines crucial work?

    I am homeless as of Sunday and have to move to the place I have rented until mid-May on Monday. At which point I go into self-isolation.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,570



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    Well now we know why this certainly isn't the Greatest Generation.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    JM1 said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    RobD said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Because when they go back to their house with Grandpa Eadric they'd probably kill him.
    It is a serious question. The world is already skewed in terms of wealth, property, assets in favour of the old.

    And now a nineteen year is being expected not to go out.

    Maybe that is just about fine for a couple of weeks, but for two years, or more?

    What has Grandpa Eadric ever done for the young ?

    I recollect he was a pretty selfish, hard-partying bastard when he was young.
    Well lots of old people are about to DIE, so maybe the world is rebalancing itself. And that's maybe a good thing. Albeit a bit tough on those that cop a particularly nasty death.

    That's what bugs me about this bug. It's a really bad way to go. Drowning in your own lung fluid, over two days, alone in a ward full of other people dying, with no relatives of friends around, holding an iPad to say goodbye to everyone (that's what they do in Italian hospitals). The disease cruelly keeps you lucid to the bitter end.

    And then they take your corpse and it is rapidly burned in Corpse Burning Unit 956XF, with no proper funeral.

    Christ. I'd rather die at home of heroin. Ta v much.
    if you described pretty much any illness in literal detail like that it would sound as scary.
    Not true at all. Take cancer. Many cancer victims end up in a hospice where they are slowly euthanised with morphine. They gently drift away, submerged in opiates,a and hopefully their last vague memory is a blur of friendly, loving faces around the death-bed.

    This is really not like that.
    That does sound better!
    Don't forget the hell of chemotherapy / surgery, often for years, that can (often does) precede the end. It's truly awful to see someone you love die of cancer.
    My Dad has his biopsy next week to check the chemotherapy has worked. Today we saw on the news that non urgent ops are cancelled after April 15th, and when he realised this meant he still had to go he looked so disappointed, it has made me very teary
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    Nigelb said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    Not exactly right; there is a distinction between the advice for the at risk groups and others
    (though it is evolving still):
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-for-vulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-and-protecting-older-people-and-vulnerable-adults
    Everyone should be trying to follow these measures as much as is pragmatic.

    We strongly advise you to follow the above measures as much as you can and to significantly limit your face-to-face interaction with friends and family if possible, particularly if you:

    are over 70
    have an underlying health condition
    are pregnant
    This advice is likely to be in place for some weeks....


    But yes, social distancing is important for everyone to practice.
    OK - that is what I thought. Thank you.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
    Who knows.
    Of course you can. How on earth would that be stopped?

    Hopefully they can’t. In La Linea people In an apartment block are taking it in turns walking the same dog!
  • rural_voterrural_voter Posts: 2,038

    Pro_Rata said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Actually, I agree with you.

    If I was 18 and desperate to get drunk and meet girls and have druggy fun, as I once was, how long would I tolerate sitting at home watching Netflix? Twonyears? No way.

    The government will have to play this aspect carefully.

    But Justin is 65 and it is inexcusable. Get home, have a biscuit, stop being a selfish arse.

    Incidentally, as I said I did see SOME people in pubs on my evening walk - and most were over 40, if not over 50. Maybe there is some truth in the boomer/Gen X accusation.
    I am glad you agree.

    There is no way 18 years olds are going to sit at home worrying about coronavirus transmission rates for 2 weeks -- let alone for however long this goes on for.

    And, I see their point of view. Why should they not dance and drink and screw?
    Because their parents might end up dead?
    If they're 18, their parents are probably 40-50. It is not a big risk.
    OK, their grandparents.
    Plenty of 40-50 years old are sending up on an ICU, plenty are being hospitalised with mild [sic] pneumonia. Who is to say this is not taking a significant lump of of their parents overall level of health, out of their remaining life expectancy.
    What are the practical actions we can do to reduce our chances of getting pneumonia, and if we get it stop it requiring hospitalisation?
    There's a pneumonia vaccine. It's available on demand to any over-65. So I asked for a vaccination, given the arrival of COVID-19. Incredibly, I was told that the NHS at least in Wales and W Midlands has been out of stock for 3-4 months.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,225
    isam said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
    That isn’t the advice; this is -
    Social distancing measures are steps you can take to reduce the social interaction between people. This will help reduce the transmission of coronavirus (COVID-19).

    They are:

    Avoid contact with someone who is displaying symptoms of coronavirus (COVID-19). These symptoms include high temperature and/or new and continuous cough
    Avoid non-essential use of public transport, varying your travel times to avoid rush hour, when possible
    Work from home, where possible. Your employer should support you to do this. Please refer to employer guidance for more information
    Avoid large gatherings, and gatherings in smaller public spaces such as pubs, cinemas, restaurants, theatres, bars, clubs
    Avoid gatherings with friends and family. Keep in touch using remote technology such as phone, internet, and social media
    Use telephone or online services to contact your GP or other essential services
    Everyone should be trying to follow these measures as much as is pragmatic....


    Over 70s and at risk groups are encouraged just to stay at home for the next twelve weeks.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,225



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    No, the government is.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767
    "expand the list of people who can register a death to include funeral directors acting on behalf of the family"

    Startling.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,533

    Andy_JS said:

    Just been for a drink at the local pub. Not very crowded. Average age about 35.

    Idiots.
    A friend who I've known for 50 years is finally getting married, a civil ceremony at his local registry office. He's asked me to do one of the readings and then join him and his relatives in a pub, which he expects to be airy and little-used in mid-afternoon.

    I'm 70. I don't want to disappoint him on his special day, so I'll do the reading. But I'm thinking of jibbing at the pub. I feel a bit selfish and cowardly, but in a way think it's a reasonable compromise between friendship and health.

    I imagine little decisions like that are being made all over the country. The small moral dilemmas of a changed world.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318

    Cyclefree said:

    For those in London, the Hawksmoor restaurants have closed and some of their staff let go.

    The first of many I suspect.

    I don’t understand why any bar or restaurant is still open. We've been told not to go, they should not be facilitating bad behaviour.
    The government has just told them that they can do takeaway food. So they’re doing exactly what the government is advising.

    Either close and provide proper compensation - not loans repayable in 6 months (out of what income??).

    Or allow them to provide alternative services and advise people about what they can do to protect their health and that of others, dependant on their risk factors.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767
    I guess the drop in R4 Today and Newsnight audiences has now been reversed?
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    I cannot forget the joys of punching cards, sending off a pile about 2 inches high and getting a print out 2 weeks later of simple calculations.

    On the other hand, dropping the pile of cards did get some odd results.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,037



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    Missing a party versus premature death. Get real.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Nigelb said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    Not exactly right; there is a distinction between the advice for the at risk groups and others
    (though it is evolving still):
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-for-vulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-and-protecting-older-people-and-vulnerable-adults
    Everyone should be trying to follow these measures as much as is pragmatic.

    We strongly advise you to follow the above measures as much as you can and to significantly limit your face-to-face interaction with friends and family if possible, particularly if you:

    are over 70
    have an underlying health condition
    are pregnant
    This advice is likely to be in place for some weeks....


    But yes, social distancing is important for everyone to practice.
    OK - that is what I thought. Thank you.
    NigelB is wrong. I believe.
    What he’s quoted is what the government advice is. For the moment.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767
    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    For those in London, the Hawksmoor restaurants have closed and some of their staff let go.

    The first of many I suspect.

    I don’t understand why any bar or restaurant is still open. We've been told not to go, they should not be facilitating bad behaviour.
    The government has just told them that they can do takeaway food. So they’re doing exactly what the government is advising.

    Either close and provide proper compensation - not loans repayable in 6 months (out of what income??).

    Or allow them to provide alternative services and advise people about what they can do to protect their health and that of others, dependant on their risk factors.
    I would be interest on the medical view (foxy??) on take away food and the virus.

    Several times this month I have hesitated over the delivery order of pizza or curry, worrying that someone had inadvertently coughed over my meal.

    I ordered in the end, but for how much longer?

    Does heat (eg a pizza oven) kill this evil little bat bastard?
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    Nigelb said:



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    No, the government is.
    And how will they be compensated? The world is already skewed in favour of the elderly.

    If this goes on for a protracted period of time, how are the old going to reward the young?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    More satire.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,037

    Andy_JS said:

    Just been for a drink at the local pub. Not very crowded. Average age about 35.

    Idiots.
    A friend who I've known for 50 years is finally getting married, a civil ceremony at his local registry office. He's asked me to do one of the readings and then join him and his relatives in a pub, which he expects to be airy and little-used in mid-afternoon.

    I'm 70. I don't want to disappoint him on his special day, so I'll do the reading. But I'm thinking of jibbing at the pub. I feel a bit selfish and cowardly, but in a way think it's a reasonable compromise between friendship and health.

    I imagine little decisions like that are being made all over the country. The small moral dilemmas of a changed world.
    Going to the pub would be selfish. Indeed, having more than the 2 witnesses at the ceremony should be canned if they want to still have the wedding.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,318
    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
    So work goes on then but no socialising. Is that it? Is the government closing all shops / restaurants then? And who defines crucial work?

    I am homeless as of Sunday and have to move to the place I have rented until mid-May on Monday. At which point I go into self-isolation.
    Move quickly.
    I can’t. The property is not available.
  • isam said:

    JM1 said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    RobD said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Because when they go back to their house with Grandpa Eadric they'd probably kill him.
    It is a serious question. The world is already skewed in terms of wealth, property, assets in favour of the old.

    And now a nineteen year is being expected not to go out.

    Maybe that is just about fine for a couple of weeks, but for two years, or more?

    What has Grandpa Eadric ever done for the young ?

    I recollect he was a pretty selfish, hard-partying bastard when he was young.
    Well lots of old people are about to DIE, so maybe the world is rebalancing itself. And that's maybe a good thing. Albeit a bit tough on those that cop a particularly nasty death.

    That's what bugs me about this bug. It's a really bad way to go. Drowning in your own lung fluid, over two days, alone in a ward full of other people dying, with no relatives of friends around, holding an iPad to say goodbye to everyone (that's what they do in Italian hospitals). The disease cruelly keeps you lucid to the bitter end.

    And then they take your corpse and it is rapidly burned in Corpse Burning Unit 956XF, with no proper funeral.

    Christ. I'd rather die at home of heroin. Ta v much.
    if you described pretty much any illness in literal detail like that it would sound as scary.
    Not true at all. Take cancer. Many cancer victims end up in a hospice where they are slowly euthanised with morphine. They gently drift away, submerged in opiates,a and hopefully their last vague memory is a blur of friendly, loving faces around the death-bed.

    This is really not like that.
    That does sound better!
    Don't forget the hell of chemotherapy / surgery, often for years, that can (often does) precede the end. It's truly awful to see someone you love die of cancer.
    My Dad has his biopsy next week to check the chemotherapy has worked. Today we saw on the news that non urgent ops are cancelled after April 15th, and when he realised this meant he still had to go he looked so disappointed, it has made me very teary

    Watching someone you love fight that horrible bastard cancer can be debilitating, isam. At times over the past year I didn't know my arse from my elbow, all the while trying to be the cool, calm, I-can-fix-owt type of guy that I think I need to be. We're all facing a shite foreseeable future, so just let it go sometimes mate. Let's all get through this.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,720
    Newsnight presents clips of politicians' speeches accompanied by doom-laden music. I really think that is not called for. "Music" accompanying a serious report is a disservice to an audience looking for reliable information and thoughtful commentary.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    More satire.
    isam said:

    JM1 said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    RobD said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Because when they go back to their house with Grandpa Eadric they'd probably kill him.
    It is a serious question. The world is already skewed in terms of wealth, property, assets in favour of the old.

    And now a nineteen year is being expected not to go out.

    Maybe that is just about fine for a couple of weeks, but for two years, or more?

    What has Grandpa Eadric ever done for the young ?

    I recollect he was a pretty selfish, hard-partying bastard when he was young.
    Well lots of old people are about to DIE, so maybe the world is rebalancing itself. And that's maybe a good thing. Albeit a bit tough on those that cop a particularly nasty death.

    That's what bugs me about this bug. It's a really bad way to go. Drowning in your own lung fluid, over two days, alone in a ward full of other people dying, with no relatives of friends around, holding an iPad to say goodbye to everyone (that's what they do in Italian hospitals). The disease cruelly keeps you lucid to the bitter end.

    And then they take your corpse and it is rapidly burned in Corpse Burning Unit 956XF, with no proper funeral.

    Christ. I'd rather die at home of heroin. Ta v much.
    if you described pretty much any illness in literal detail like that it would sound as scary.
    Not true at all. Take cancer. Many cancer victims end up in a hospice where they are slowly euthanised with morphine. They gently drift away, submerged in opiates,a and hopefully their last vague memory is a blur of friendly, loving faces around the death-bed.

    This is really not like that.
    That does sound better!
    Don't forget the hell of chemotherapy / surgery, often for years, that can (often does) precede the end. It's truly awful to see someone you love die of cancer.
    My Dad has his biopsy next week to check the chemotherapy has worked. Today we saw on the news that non urgent ops are cancelled after April 15th, and when he realised this meant he still had to go he looked so disappointed, it has made me very teary

    Ah, that’s horrible. My sympathies.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609
    isam said:

    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    If you live near fields you can’t go for a run over them?
    Who knows.
    Of course you can. How on earth would that be stopped?

    Hopefully they can’t. In La Linea people In an apartment block are taking it in turns walking the same dog!
    When the dogs no longer want to go for walks, you'll know you've overdone it!
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486

    I guess the drop in R4 Today and Newsnight audiences has now been reversed?

    Newsnight has been by far the best TV news source since the crisis began. (admittedly a lowish bar, but still)
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    Missing a party versus premature death. Get real.
    It is not one party.

    This will go on until there is a vaccine.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163

    Tim_B said:

    ...

    No paper tape. We did have a data cell though! We even had a 1401 in the computer room for legacy programs.

    COBOL on an ICL 1900 for me back in 1981. Coding sheets, punch cards with no automatic sequencing (don't drop the deck before first compiliation!), 16kb module limit, 6 bit characters, 24 bit words, 8,388,608 was the largest value you could hold in a single word computational field...

    Ah, those were the days!
    George II anyone? 2 character filenames! I hated that OS. It had a language that used decision tables for its logic, but I cannot recall the name.

    RPG II, RPG/400, RPG IV, COBOL, C, C++, SQL, PHP, Python, Java, Javascript, Dataflex,... oh Synon/2 (that was a nice little earner)

    I wish I was as good at human languages :D
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 8,163


    // LOAD NEW-THREAD
    // RUN

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,225
    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Nigelb said:

    eadric said:

    Cyclefree said:

    This lockdown - is this the one of everyone over 70 and those with high risk conditions?

    No, it's the one of EVERYONE.

    Like in Italy and Spain and elsewhere.

    It's the one that says Stay in your home apart from essential trips to doctors, to buy food, to go to crucial work.

    It the Wuhan Clang. Life, as we know it, ends.
    Not exactly right; there is a distinction between the advice for the at risk groups and others
    (though it is evolving still):
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-for-vulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-and-protecting-older-people-and-vulnerable-adults
    Everyone should be trying to follow these measures as much as is pragmatic.

    We strongly advise you to follow the above measures as much as you can and to significantly limit your face-to-face interaction with friends and family if possible, particularly if you:

    are over 70
    have an underlying health condition
    are pregnant
    This advice is likely to be in place for some weeks....


    But yes, social distancing is important for everyone to practice.
    OK - that is what I thought. Thank you.
    NigelB is wrong. I believe.
    What he’s quoted is what the government advice is. For the moment.
    Yes, but the point we were all arguing is that the advice is about to change, drastically

    ie lockdown
    That’s really not clear at the moment.
    Lockdown for the over 79s and at risk groups, yes. But I’m not all clear on what will be proposed for the rest of us. I guess it depends to some extent on how many Justins are out there.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,767

    This thread is at the undertakers

  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,037



    Exactly. Many of us in that age range have kids who are older teenagers and parents who are in their 70s or 80s and pretty fragile. The risk is that we pick the virus up off our kids and pass it on to our parents while caring for them.

    We have no guarantee that a vaccine can be produced even within two years.

    You don't have the right to erase two or more years of the lives of an entire generation of young people.
    But you can literally erase the last 15 years of the life of a 70 year old who would otherwise have reached 85.
    The 70 year old is asking the 19 year old not to do something. By what right?

    The 19 year old is not asking anything of the 70 year old.

    What about the love affairs that did not happen, the parties they did not go to, the bands they did not play in, while you enforce a lockdown for years of their youth ?
    Missing a party versus premature death. Get real.
    It is not one party.

    This will go on until there is a vaccine.
    I'll just check with the ghost of Jeremy Bentham on how many parties are needed to achieve greater utility than avoiding premature death.

    Perhaps someone could offer a spread bet on the result?

    Things are getting rather insane. Good night all. Stay safe and help keep everyone else safe.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,609

    This thread is at the undertakers

    No mourners.....
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    isam said:

    JM1 said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    isam said:

    eadric said:

    RobD said:

    eadric said:

    eadric said:



    The government has specifically said DO NOT GO TO PUBS

    Why do you think Belgium, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, and many other countries have CLOSED all bars, restaurants, cafes, etc?

    Is it for a laugh? Are they self harming their economies because they are over-reacting?

    Coronavirus can go two ways. You lock it down and you get near to South Korea. You don't, and you become Iran. If people won't voluntarily isolate, the government has to step in, and lock us all up. Great.

    The old world has gone and won't be back till there is a vaccine, two years away at least.

    When you were young, you went to pubs, you drank and took drugs, you fell in love, you played in bands, you went to parties, you did wild and irresponsible things, no ?

    Why should young people lose a year or two years out of their glorious youth in lockdown? They are not going to get seriously ill, anyhow.

    Who are you -- an elderly Malvolio -- to say there shall be no more cakes and ale?
    Justin is 65
    I am talking about the young.

    As there is no end to this without a vaccine, why should young people lose precious, glorious years of their lives stuck inside the house with Grandpa Eadric and his antiseptic gels.
    Because when they go back to their house with Grandpa Eadric they'd probably kill him.
    It is a serious question. The world is already skewed in terms of wealth, property, assets in favour of the old.

    And now a nineteen year is being expected not to go out.

    Maybe that is just about fine for a couple of weeks, but for two years, or more?

    What has Grandpa Eadric ever done for the young ?

    I recollect he was a pretty selfish, hard-partying bastard when he was young.
    Well lots of old people are about to DIE, so maybe the world is rebalancing itself. And that's maybe a good thing. Albeit a bit tough on those that cop a particularly nasty death.

    That's what bugs me about this bug. It's a really bad way to go. Drowning in your own lung fluid, over two days, alone in a ward full of other people dying, with no relatives of friends around, holding an iPad to say goodbye to everyone (that's what they do in Italian hospitals). The disease cruelly keeps you lucid to the bitter end.

    And then they take your corpse and it is rapidly burned in Corpse Burning Unit 956XF, with no proper funeral.

    Christ. I'd rather die at home of heroin. Ta v much.
    if you described pretty much any illness in literal detail like that it would sound as scary.
    Not true at all. Take cancer. Many cancer victims end up in a hospice where they are slowly euthanised with morphine. They gently drift away, submerged in opiates,a and hopefully their last vague memory is a blur of friendly, loving faces around the death-bed.

    This is really not like that.
    That does sound better!
    Don't forget the hell of chemotherapy / surgery, often for years, that can (often does) precede the end. It's truly awful to see someone you love die of cancer.
    My Dad has his biopsy next week to check the chemotherapy has worked. Today we saw on the news that non urgent ops are cancelled after April 15th, and when he realised this meant he still had to go he looked so disappointed, it has made me very teary

    Fingers crossed all best wishes.
  • MyBurningEarsMyBurningEars Posts: 3,651
    edited March 2020
    BigRich said:

    Interesting point, I hadn't considered how culturally drinking from a shared container was a major part of life for thousands of years. Much the same principle as with a Viking drinking horn full of mead being passed around the table at a feast.

    The modern equivalents perhaps being passing a Joint or a 'crak' pipe, not my thing, but I understand the custom is to pass to the left, the same a bottle of port.

    Ha! A Paraguayan friend showed me their flasks for mate and tereré. Was apparently common for them all to be shared around with your friends actually and the idea of sucking the same straw seemed a bit off to me but they didn't seem to mind (wonder how COVID-19 changes things!). To quote someone who I think has it right whereas my memory might be a bit dodgy, https://www.bradtguides.com/articles/terere-mate/

    Both mate and tereré are made with yerba mate, which means ‘mate leaf ’, but people usually just say yerba for short. The cup for the leaves is called a guampa, and there are different types for tereré and for mate. For tereré, a cow’s horn is generally used, with the point cut and filled in with a wooden stopper, so that it will stand up. For mate, people usually use a wooden guampa, because it has to be something with insulation against the heat of the water. In both cases a metal straw is used, called a bombilla, which has a flattened end with a strainer on it, so that the yerba leaves do not pass up the straw. Only one guampa and one bombilla is used, and it is passed around the group for each to drink in turn. This can be found distasteful by many foreigners, who are afraid of getting infections, but in fact that is very unlikely, although not totally unknown.

    Just as there are two kinds of guampa, there are two kinds of vacuum flask. The one that holds hot water for mate is similar to the kind of Thermos you can buy in other countries. But the kind for holding iced water has to have a much broader mouth, because the ice is made in thick bars of about 4cm diameter. This fat kind of vacuum flask uses polystyrene as the insulation material, and is very light to carry. Beautiful souvenir vacuum flasks are made with a decorated leather casing, and guampas can have details of silverwork on them. You will see a lot of these in Luque.
  • MyBurningEarsMyBurningEars Posts: 3,651
    edited March 2020
    Alistair said:



    I wore out the programming possibilities of a ZX81 in a week and traded it in against a BBC Model B which lasted me about 10 years.

    For anyone who's into their retrocomputing, there's still a ZX81 demoscene!! Not as big as the Commodore/Amiga or Speccie demoscenes, but arguably even more hardcore. Anyone with fondish 80s/earlys 90s memories of the limitations of their Spectrum or C64 or Amiga 500 should browse the demoscene vids on Youtube. What the masters can get out of that hardware is incredible, and every now and then some new tricks come along.

    Bearing in mind the limitations of the ZX81, especially the fact it didn't originally come with a way to do "hi-res" i.e. pixel-by-pixel graphics (though ways around this have been found), the following demos are astonishing:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X92xvLlbnVg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKj6TaADFWo
    That is utterly outrageous. Jaw dropping. I frankly can't believe that.

    Brightened my day!
    There's loads more on youtube, it's a whole subculture of the most gifted geek-artistes. I fear anyone born after, what, maybe 1990(?), will find it hard to understand why we are fussing over it. But it is mind-blowing.

    The Spectrum demos are great, to someone who remembers the original software it's freakish to see how they can get past the issue of attribute clash (aka colour bleeding: the way each 8x8 tile of pixels could only have two colours). There's a nice selection here, you can zoom forwards in time to the

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vtUCTX4qrA

    Oh, and then someone thought they it sounded a great idea to port Doom to it!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v7cFGneuaw
This discussion has been closed.