Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Labour’s fan club is far too confident: 10 reasons why 2019 ma

1234568

Comments

  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,238
    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794
    eristdoof said:

    justin124 said:

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    At what point in 2017 - ie how many weeks before the election - did Corbyn start his resurgence? That’s the pattern we should be looking for. If he’s gonna do it again he needs an exact repeat.

    I think it was YouGov, fieldwork on 25/26 April with a 16-point lead compared to the previous 23-point lead. Assume poll published on 27th and that was 42 days before polling day.

    We are 40 days from polling day.

    So it should start around now. Hmm. Makes for a nervy week.
    In their favour they don't start so far behind the Tories, and gains by the Lib Dems and SNP will mean that a small swing to the Tories will still leave them short of a majority. So there's a bit of leeway.

    There will probably be enough polls published in the Sunday papers tomorrow that one of them, randomly, will have good news for Labour. Pretty dire if that's not the case.
    I'd be astonished if there isn't an upswing for Labour after their campaign launch. There'll be a lot of Labour voters who will previously have flirted with other parties who'll use a Corbyn stump speech on telly as a psychological crutch - an excuse for discarding their doubts and reverting to type. You get the general idea - "Well, there were all these stories on the telly about Labour being soft on Europe, economically suicidal and rabidly anti-Semitic - but I liked what Jeremy said about the NHS and the bankers, and he sounds very nice, and I'm sure all the negative stuff people say about Labour is just the work of the biased MSM, and the Liberals are just Tories, and the Greens can never win, so yeah I'm voting Labour because I've always voted Labour in every election ever anyway."

    There was an example of just such a biddable idiot as this who took the time to call into a show I was listening to on 5 Live earlier this week. There are an awful lot of them out there.
    Similar things could be said re-Johnson's closeness to the Arbeit Macht Frei wing of the Tory party.
    He's done it again. Is he a troll?
    Apparently the only form of political analogy that can be used is to the Nazis. It's not like there's hundreds of years of alternative parties and positions over several continents to choose from. That would just be silly... :)
  • No idea if these figs are accurate, but if so it looks like de yoot could be getting politically aware and may get off its sorry arse to vote.

    https://twitter.com/norsel1on/status/1190538265276952576?s=20

    On the one hand, we should welcome greater voter participation.

    On the other, if they all then troop down to the polling stations and shore up the Far Left vote it could be a catastrophe.

    The overriding priority in this election is neither the EU nor the survival of the Union - it's keeping Corbyn and McDonnell away from the levers of power. Every single gain made from Labour is, to a greater or lesser extent, to be welcomed.
    What in heaven's name could they do that is worse than what the Tories have already done?
    Corbyn will take that as a challenge...
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774
    First the crow in Thompson’s bedroom, now the Rugby. The gods aren’t happy with us.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794

    The Tories are more Jedem das Seine than Arbeit Macht Frei.

    Last time you used a word I didn't understand I had to clear my browser history and run CCleaner to clean the disk[1]. Before I google "Jedem das Seine", does it involve something that would get me arrested for Googling?


    [1] Which is a bugger because now I'm on Windows 10 (spit) I don't know what Cortana is recording even tho I'm not signed in
  • Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    Yes. Someone on here said the big launch for Unite to Remain would be early next week, so expect most to be announced then. Those are the three that I've heard of.

    Assume Brighton Pavilion and Brecon will be as before. There's lots of speculation. Greens standing aside in Totnes for new Lib Dem Wollaston is an obvious one, but also a big concession by the Greens who finished ahead of the Lib Dems in GE2015 with 10.3% of the vote.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    PClipp said:

    MaxPB said:

    Foxy said:

    malcolmg said:

    AndyJS said:

    Confirmation that the LDs are to stand aside for the Greens in the Isle of Wight:
    https://twitter.com/iwightnews/status/1190577399664185345

    Funny how all the disgruntled Tories are flocking to the Lib Dems, they see it as the other Tory party.
    It really is simple. You win elections by getting people to support you who didn't in the last election. So 22% of 2017 Lab voters, thank you very much and 10% of 2017 Con voters and a few MPs are welcome imo.
    The MPs you've welcomed - you're welcome to them!
    Indeed. Honestly I'm glad we've managed to get rid of them, they will cause exactly the same trouble for the Lib Dems when they see a policy they don't like. They want it to be all about them, not the party.
    There is a point not discussed but if any of these ex conservative mps get elected as liberals, apart from Brexit, they remain conservatives at heart and in a tight HOC they would be likely to support a lot of the conservative manifesto
    "They remain conservatives at heart", do they? Tons of wishful thinking there, BigG. Quite the contrary. The more they have to do with people with liberal values, the more Liberal they will become. It is time that everybody who wants to see a liberal society came together in the Liberal Democrats. That applies just as much to liberals still n the Labour Party. And of course that is what people are doing.
    Quite. Conservatives were once a mix of liberals and tories. The tories have taken over and the whole party has become infested with nationalists and racists because that's what tories are.
    The liberal wing, including those who style themselves as "one nation" conservatives are deluding themselves into thinking their party exists any more. They really only have three choices: leave and support another party like the Lib Dems, stay and fight to win back the soul of their party from the tories (which they aren't doing), or bury their heads in the sand and prop up the nationalists.
    I have all the time and encouragement for those in the first two camps, but those in the third camp are fucking ridiculous. Ridiculous because they know deep down that they're propping up a regressive and small-minded racist as their party leader. And if they get their election win, they will smile, gloat, enjoy a brief sugar high, then have to endure years of regret as they watch the boot come down over and over again.

    The worst people in the whole world are the ones who know the difference between right and wrong, and choose the side they know is wrong.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736
    I see Trump described one of his political opponents as a poor bastard who quit(ted) like a dog.

    I just hope he's wrong in his assumption that that kind of language will be appealing to the US electorate.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,503
    edited November 2019
    PClipp said:



    "They remain conservatives at heart", do they? Tons of wishful thinking there, BigG. Quite the contrary. The more they have to do with people with liberal values, the more Liberal they will become. It is time that everybody who wants to see a liberal society came together in the Liberal Democrats. That applies just as much to liberals still n the Labour Party. And of course that is what people are doing.

    Liberal, like Nick Clegg's thoughts on gay marriage? I know lots of people in all parties and I'm in coalition with LibDems, many of whom I really like. But I wouldn't say you could reliably predict who will have moderate, tolerant values based on which party they're in. It's as much a temperamental thing as a political one.

    The more fundamental problem that would stop me ever thinking of joining the LibDems is that, more than any of the other parties, they seem to be a club for winning elections rather than a party with a coherent concept of what Britain should be like, and it's a moveable feast which they quite openly shift around according to current public mood. Like their famous bar charts, it seems to me fundamentally unreliable. Better than the Tories or BXP, sure. But nonetheless uneasy ground.

    I understand where, say, Nigel Farage wants to get to. I think I get the general idea of where Boris Johnson wants to go. I certainly know what Jeremy Corbyn wants. But the LibDems? What would Britain look like after 10 years of LibDem government?
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736
    viewcode said:

    The Tories are more Jedem das Seine than Arbeit Macht Frei.

    Last time you used a word I didn't understand I had to clear my browser history and run CCleaner to clean the disk[1]. Before I google "Jedem das Seine", does it involve something that would get me arrested for Googling?


    [1] Which is a bugger because now I'm on Windows 10 (spit) I don't know what Cortana is recording even tho I'm not signed in
    Can you really be arrested for Googling something these days?
  • Before the whole rugby WC gets consigned to the 'move along, nothing to see here' dustbin of broken dreams.

    https://twitter.com/mrdavidwhitley/status/1190551726731878400?s=20
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,428
    @NickPalmer probably a lot like Blair’s Britain but with less authoritarianism and more electoral reform.
  • Chris said:

    I see Trump described one of his political opponents as a poor bastard who quit(ted) like a dog.

    I just hope he's wrong in his assumption that that kind of language will be appealing to the US electorate.

    I was mostly upset at what an appallingly bad analogy it was. A famous characteristic of dogs is that they do NOT quit, even when they should... think dogged, dog in the manger, terrier-like, like a dog with a bone etc.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    Yes. Someone on here said the big launch for Unite to Remain would be early next week, so expect most to be announced then. Those are the three that I've heard of.

    Assume Brighton Pavilion and Brecon will be as before. There's lots of speculation. Greens standing aside in Totnes for new Lib Dem Wollaston is an obvious one, but also a big concession by the Greens who finished ahead of the Lib Dems in GE2015 with 10.3% of the vote.
    Yes, there should be a Remain alliance announcement next week. I shared the IOW announcement last night, having checked to make sure it wasn’t embargoed - of course the numpty who sent it to me then came back with a “p.s. don’t tell anyone” - so as it happens you heard it here first. Although I see the decision has now leaked out at least to the local media.

    The fact the Remain parties are prepared to work together to offer a single candidate in a range of key seats is a welcome development.
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736

    PClipp said:



    "They remain conservatives at heart", do they? Tons of wishful thinking there, BigG. Quite the contrary. The more they have to do with people with liberal values, the more Liberal they will become. It is time that everybody who wants to see a liberal society came together in the Liberal Democrats. That applies just as much to liberals still n the Labour Party. And of course that is what people are doing.

    Liberal, like Nick Clegg's thoughts on gay marriage?
    Did Clegg have bad thoughts about gay marriage?
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,463
    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    west oxfordshire (namely Wantage) saw a huge cooperation between LDs and Greens in May so not really a surprise, also a big REMAIN vote but Ed Vaizey the sitting Tory has fairly strong remain credentials so should be a fairly safe Con hold though he was suspended over "that" vote but now back in fold.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,503
    kinabalu said:

    I really enjoy Kinabalu’s posts. They give me a good laugh, which is what I think they’re intended to do.

    :smile:

    I like to make intelligent points in a stupid way.

    So often one sees the opposite.
    Ouch. (fingers cap uneasily)
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736

    Chris said:

    I see Trump described one of his political opponents as a poor bastard who quit(ted) like a dog.

    I just hope he's wrong in his assumption that that kind of language will be appealing to the US electorate.

    I was mostly upset at what an appallingly bad analogy it was. A famous characteristic of dogs is that they do NOT quit, even when they should... think dogged, dog in the manger, terrier-like, like a dog with a bone etc.
    Well, I did wonder whether dogs were generally regarded as quitters.

    Still, it's mostly the rudeness that offended me.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Wonder what the maximum number of seats the LDs would stand aside in would be.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    IanB2 said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    Yes. Someone on here said the big launch for Unite to Remain would be early next week, so expect most to be announced then. Those are the three that I've heard of.

    Assume Brighton Pavilion and Brecon will be as before. There's lots of speculation. Greens standing aside in Totnes for new Lib Dem Wollaston is an obvious one, but also a big concession by the Greens who finished ahead of the Lib Dems in GE2015 with 10.3% of the vote.
    Yes, there should be a Remain alliance announcement next week. I shared the IOW announcement last night, having checked to make sure it wasn’t embargoed - of course the numpty who sent it to me then came back with a “p.s. don’t tell anyone” - so as it happens you heard it here first. Although I see the decision has now leaked out at least to the local media.

    The fact the Remain parties are prepared to work together to offer a single candidate in a range of key seats is a welcome development.
    I posted it on the VoteUK forum last night after seeing it on here.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,428
    nichomar said:

    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
    This.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774
    nichomar said:

    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
    The rumour I heard is that a few prominent Labour remainers might be given a free run. But I don’t know for sure. What would be clever is for Labour to give the LibDems/Greens a free run in just a few key seats - for example JRM’s - but of course because it would be clever we can put money on tribal Labour not being willing to do so.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    west oxfordshire (namely Wantage) saw a huge cooperation between LDs and Greens in May so not really a surprise, also a big REMAIN vote but Ed Vaizey the sitting Tory has fairly strong remain credentials so should be a fairly safe Con hold though he was suspended over "that" vote but now back in fold.
    Yes, the winnability of such seats is another thing entirely. But South Oxon is interesting because the Conservatives have been in a state of civil war there and lost the council a few months ago.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    I think Labour's chances in Canterbury are higher with a Lib Dem than with clear run.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774

    @NickPalmer probably a lot like Blair’s Britain but with less authoritarianism and more electoral reform.

    Because we all remember the public protest, the resignation, the angry press releases, from Palmer when Labour reneged on its promise to introduce a fairer voting system when they were in power? I must have been out of the country that month.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979

    MaxPB said:

    Foxy said:

    malcolmg said:

    AndyJS said:

    Confirmation that the LDs are to stand aside for the Greens in the Isle of Wight:

    https://twitter.com/iwightnews/status/1190577399664185345

    Funny how all the disgruntled Tories are flocking to the Lib Dems, they see it as the other Tory party.
    It really is simple. You win elections by getting people to support you who didn't in the last election. So 22% of 2017 Lab voters, thank you very much and 10% of 2017 Con voters and a few MPs are welcome imo.
    The MPs you've welcomed - you're welcome to them!
    Indeed. Honestly I'm glad we've managed to get rid of them, they will cause exactly the same trouble for the Lib Dems when they see a policy they don't like. They want it to be all about them, not the party.
    There is a point not discussed but if any of these ex conservative mps get elected as liberals, apart from Brexit, they remain conservatives at heart and in a tight HOC they would be likely to support a lot of the conservative manifesto

    Once they have left the party they have no obligation to support the Tories. LD voted consistently against the Blair govt (before iraq) even when the two parties were on the same page!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774
    AndyJS said:

    IanB2 said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    Yes. Someone on here said the big launch for Unite to Remain would be early next week, so expect most to be announced then. Those are the three that I've heard of.

    Assume Brighton Pavilion and Brecon will be as before. There's lots of speculation. Greens standing aside in Totnes for new Lib Dem Wollaston is an obvious one, but also a big concession by the Greens who finished ahead of the Lib Dems in GE2015 with 10.3% of the vote.
    Yes, there should be a Remain alliance announcement next week. I shared the IOW announcement last night, having checked to make sure it wasn’t embargoed - of course the numpty who sent it to me then came back with a “p.s. don’t tell anyone” - so as it happens you heard it here first. Although I see the decision has now leaked out at least to the local media.

    The fact the Remain parties are prepared to work together to offer a single candidate in a range of key seats is a welcome development.
    I posted it on the VoteUK forum last night after seeing it on here.
    Since I didn’t say, “p.s. don’t tell anyone”, fair enough.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    IanB2 said:

    nichomar said:

    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
    The rumour I heard is that a few prominent Labour remainers might be given a free run. But I don’t know for sure. What would be clever is for Labour to give the LibDems/Greens a free run in just a few key seats - for example JRM’s - but of course because it would be clever we can put money on tribal Labour not being willing to do so.
    That would make little sense . Labour was within 5000 votes of JRM in 2010 and well ahead of the LDs in an election in which the latter polled 23% nationally to Labour's 29.7%.. Moreover, Labour would probably have won the seat on such boundaries in 2005.
  • Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    west oxfordshire (namely Wantage) saw a huge cooperation between LDs and Greens in May so not really a surprise, also a big REMAIN vote but Ed Vaizey the sitting Tory has fairly strong remain credentials so should be a fairly safe Con hold though he was suspended over "that" vote but now back in fold.
    Yes, the winnability of such seats is another thing entirely. But South Oxon is interesting because the Conservatives have been in a state of civil war there and lost the council a few months ago.
    Wantage is not in West Oxfordshire. Witney is however the same as West Oxon.

    Which gives me the chance to say that it is also very remain, with an avowedly Brexit m.p. who is too new to have a personal following. Tories win partly due to a divided opposition - Witney Chipping Norton are Labour but the villages on the edge of Oxford Lib Dem. Tories will probably win not least because Labour have built up a good base in Witney itself. Even so, for the first time, by-elections excepted, it is interesting here.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    edited November 2019

    No idea if these figs are accurate, but if so it looks like de yoot could be getting politically aware and may get off its sorry arse to vote.

    https://twitter.com/norsel1on/status/1190538265276952576?s=20

    On the one hand, we should welcome greater voter participation.

    On the other, if they all then troop down to the polling stations and shore up the Far Left vote it could be a catastrophe.

    The overriding priority in this election is neither the EU nor the survival of the Union - it's keeping Corbyn and McDonnell away from the levers of power. Every single gain made from Labour is, to a greater or lesser extent, to be welcomed.
    What in heaven's name could they do that is worse than what the Tories have already done?
    The expropriation of private property (whether paid for at an arbitrary rate, well short of market value, voted through by Parliament, or outright) would be enough to completely destroy the economy on its own. And yes, I'm sure there'd be fountains of cash for Our Beloved NHS, and pretty much everything else, but since it would be about as valuable as sheets of toilet paper (and, indeed, best used as such, since one would otherwise have to queue for four hours at the local Red Star Supermarket to obtain one's ration of the real thing,) this would hardly help.

    The core of the Labour leadership - and most of the mass membership of the party - resemble a bunch of crazed revolutionaries from one of the more radical South American movements. Scandinavian Social Democrats they ain't.
  • Molly Scott Cato, the Green MEP for the South West, is standing in Stroud, where the Greens have seven councillors in the constituency. That would seem like another strong possibility for the Liberal Democrats to stand aside for the Greens.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774
    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    nichomar said:

    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
    The rumour I heard is that a few prominent Labour remainers might be given a free run. But I don’t know for sure. What would be clever is for Labour to give the LibDems/Greens a free run in just a few key seats - for example JRM’s - but of course because it would be clever we can put money on tribal Labour not being willing to do so.
    That would make little sense . Labour was within 5000 votes of JRM in 2010 and well ahead of the LDs in an election in which the latter polled 23% nationally to Labour's 29.7%.. Moreover, Labour would probably have won the seat on such boundaries in 2005.
    What matters is the number of voters who didn’t vote for you last time who are prepared to consider doing so this time. For Labour, that means they can never win the seat. Indeed a lot of the voters who plumped for them last time are already looking elsewhere.

    It is time that Labour got real. There isn’t going to be a majority Labour Government, ever, again.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited November 2019

    Molly Scott Cato, the Green MEP for the South West, is standing in Stroud, where the Greens have seven councillors in the constituency. That would seem like another strong possibility for the Liberal Democrats to stand aside for the Greens.

    The seat is currently held by Labour, although I don't know what the sitting MP's views on Europe are.
  • Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    I think Labour's chances in Canterbury are higher with a Lib Dem than with clear run.
    I have seen plenty of stuff that says while Labour people vote Lib Dem, Lib Dems themselves split much more evenly. To the point of having a neutral effect were they to withdraw.

    Also will the arrival, no matter how temporary, of a bunch of Tory mp's have an effect on the Lib Dem's positioning?
  • IanB2 said:

    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    nichomar said:

    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
    The rumour I heard is that a few prominent Labour remainers might be given a free run. But I don’t know for sure. What would be clever is for Labour to give the LibDems/Greens a free run in just a few key seats - for example JRM’s - but of course because it would be clever we can put money on tribal Labour not being willing to do so.
    That would make little sense . Labour was within 5000 votes of JRM in 2010 and well ahead of the LDs in an election in which the latter polled 23% nationally to Labour's 29.7%.. Moreover, Labour would probably have won the seat on such boundaries in 2005.
    What matters is the number of voters who didn’t vote for you last time who are prepared to consider doing so this time. For Labour, that means they can never win the seat. Indeed a lot of the voters who plumped for them last time are already looking elsewhere.

    It is time that Labour got real. There isn’t going to be a majority Labour Government, ever, again.
    I think it’s highly possible that there will be a Labour majority government, but certainly not under its current leadership.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    IanB2 said:

    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    nichomar said:

    PClipp said:

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    Rosie Duffield is a member of the Labour Party, isn`t she? with all that that implies.

    In contrast, Anna Soubry and Dominic Grieve are no longer members of the Tories.

    It does make a difference.
    Also labour aren’t interested in the remain alliance are they so why should they be accommodated?
    The rumour I heard is that a few prominent Labour remainers might be given a free run. But I don’t know for sure. What would be clever is for Labour to give the LibDems/Greens a free run in just a few key seats - for example JRM’s - but of course because it would be clever we can put money on tribal Labour not being willing to do so.
    That would make little sense . Labour was within 5000 votes of JRM in 2010 and well ahead of the LDs in an election in which the latter polled 23% nationally to Labour's 29.7%.. Moreover, Labour would probably have won the seat on such boundaries in 2005.
    What matters is the number of voters who didn’t vote for you last time who are prepared to consider doing so this time. For Labour, that means they can never win the seat. Indeed a lot of the voters who plumped for them last time are already looking elsewhere.

    It is time that Labour got real. There isn’t going to be a majority Labour Government, ever, again.
    A non sequitur based on wishful thinking.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,428
    Byronic said:

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
    Farage dgaf
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774
    Byronic said:

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
    As a self-declared remainer, I am sure that is the last thing you would want to see.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    Incidentally, mods, I STILL can't see comments on the normal site. Using Chrome on Windows. Is there a fix??
  • Gabs2Gabs2 Posts: 1,268
    Dura_Ace said:

    felix said:

    AndyJS said:

    Confirmation that the LDs are to stand aside for the Greens in the Isle of Wight:

    https://twitter.com/iwightnews/status/1190577399664185345

    How can Jo Swinson say she will be PM and stand down candidates in a GE

    Last night's 5 live and question time were not at all kind on 'revoke'

    Not sure it is as good a policy as she thinks it is
    justin124 said:

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    At what point in 2017 - ie how many weeks before the election - did Corbyn start his resurgence? That’s the pattern we should be looking for. If he’s gonna do it again he needs an exact repeat.

    I think it was YouGov, fieldwork on 25/26 April with a 16-point lead compared to the previous 23-point lead. Assume poll published on 27th and that was 42 days before polling day.

    We are 40 days from polling day.

    So it should start around now. Hmm. Makes for a nervy week.
    In their favour they don't start so far behind the Tories, and gains by the Lib Dems and SNP will mean that a small swing to the Tories will still leave them short of a majority. So there's a bit of leeway.

    There will probably be enough polls published in the Sunday papers tomorrow that one of them, randomly, will have good news for Labour. Pretty dire if that's not the case.
    how I was listening to on 5 Live earlier this week. There are an awful lot of them out there.
    Similar things could be said re-Johnson's closeness to the Arbeit Macht Frei wing of the Tory party.
    Moderator alert! This sort of post really is unacceptable. The only charitable explanation is drunkeness.
    The Tories are more Jedem das Seine than Arbeit Macht Frei.
    Another day, another mininisation of the Holocaust on PB. Shameful.
  • Gabs2Gabs2 Posts: 1,268

    Byronic said:

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
    Farage dgaf
    Exactly. He doesn't really want to leave. He loses his gravy train ticket and political relevance.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    Byronic said:

    Incidentally, mods, I STILL can't see comments on the normal site. Using Chrome on Windows. Is there a fix??

    I found clearing the history and the cookies did it for me!
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    IanB2 said:

    Byronic said:

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
    As a self-declared remainer, I am sure that is the last thing you would want to see.
    When it comes to Brexit, I hover in a quantum superposition of states, neither one thing or the other, but somehow both at the same time, until I am observed. Rather like the country.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    Byronic said:

    Incidentally, mods, I STILL can't see comments on the normal site. Using Chrome on Windows. Is there a fix??

    I found clearing the history and the cookies did it for me!
    Ta. Shall have a go
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,528

    Byronic said:

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
    Farage dgaf
    Tbh, it might not be up to Nige.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Let us spare a thought for a moment for those England rugby fans who are also Man U supporters. This is not a position that one would wish to occupy in a Venn diagram right now.
  • alb1onalb1on Posts: 698
    Byronic said:

    kinabalu said:

    How much of a bounce were you expecting given the Tories are already hitting 40+ in the polls?

    2% or so. But of course zero now - or possibly even a drop due to the letdown. It's why I was rooting for SA despite being an avid patriot. Johnson cannot in fairness be blamed, he wasn't playing, he had no role in team selection, but since when has politics been fair? It was bad, it happened on his watch, there's an election on. About time he got unlucky because he's been getting all the breaks so far.
    I’m sorry but this is embarrassing pifflewank
    Whilst I agree with the sentiment I would avoid words like 'pifflewank' as people will assume you are Boris.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794
    Chris said:


    viewcode said:

    The Tories are more Jedem das Seine than Arbeit Macht Frei.

    Last time you used a word I didn't understand I had to clear my browser history and run CCleaner to clean the disk[1]. Before I google "Jedem das Seine", does it involve something that would get me arrested for Googling?


    [1] Which is a bugger because now I'm on Windows 10 (spit) I don't know what Cortana is recording even tho I'm not signed in
    Can you really be arrested for Googling something these days?
    I get my laptops checked and cleared down every two/three years, and I occasionally have to pass security checks (not big ones!). It's best not to do something that looks weird, even if it is ultimately innocuous.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,851
    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794
    kinabalu said:

    I like to make intelligent points in a stupid way. So often one sees the opposite.

    Hah! I like to make stupid points in a stupid way! Which isn't the opposite! That told you, huh!??!!

    [Thinks for a minute. Bugger... :) ]

  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    alb1on said:

    Byronic said:

    kinabalu said:

    How much of a bounce were you expecting given the Tories are already hitting 40+ in the polls?

    2% or so. But of course zero now - or possibly even a drop due to the letdown. It's why I was rooting for SA despite being an avid patriot. Johnson cannot in fairness be blamed, he wasn't playing, he had no role in team selection, but since when has politics been fair? It was bad, it happened on his watch, there's an election on. About time he got unlucky because he's been getting all the breaks so far.
    I’m sorry but this is embarrassing pifflewank
    Whilst I agree with the sentiment I would avoid words like 'pifflewank' as people will assume you are Boris.
    I am constantly presumed to be someone I am not, so I shall not lament.

    Thanks to Taxman: clearing out all the cookies and crap has restored me to commenting health. I feel like a new PBer.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    I am off on my holidays! I am on my own for a whole week. Just tipped a waitress at Manchester Airport because I fancied her! No doubt SeanT would have provided a different kind of tip! :wink:

  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    Byronic said:

    alb1on said:

    Byronic said:

    kinabalu said:

    How much of a bounce were you expecting given the Tories are already hitting 40+ in the polls?

    2% or so. But of course zero now - or possibly even a drop due to the letdown. It's why I was rooting for SA despite being an avid patriot. Johnson cannot in fairness be blamed, he wasn't playing, he had no role in team selection, but since when has politics been fair? It was bad, it happened on his watch, there's an election on. About time he got unlucky because he's been getting all the breaks so far.
    I’m sorry but this is embarrassing pifflewank
    Whilst I agree with the sentiment I would avoid words like 'pifflewank' as people will assume you are Boris.
    I am constantly presumed to be someone I am not, so I shall not lament.

    Thanks to Taxman: clearing out all the cookies and crap has restored me to commenting health. I feel like a new PBer.
    Good! When I could not get the comments I wondered what had happened. OGH has a very good website. Keep it up sir!
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,361
    Roger said:

    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!

    Let us know if you take him up on it. This is a betting site after all.....
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,774

    Roger said:

    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!

    Let us know if you take him up on it. This is a betting site after all.....
    Surely it’s about time people started paying for the costs of their care home.....? ;)
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,361
    Gabs2 said:

    Byronic said:

    I was wondering about whether this would happen. But for the Conservatives' stand on Brexit, Soubry would otherwise have been very content to stay within the Conservative Party. Unlike Allen and Wollaston, Soubry clearly sees differences between her wider Conservative values and those of the Lib Dems that she views as irreconcilable, hence her decision to stay with the corpse of whatever her flatlining new party calls itself nowadays. So putting Brexit aside, the decision of the Lib Dems to nonetheless endorse Soubry does say quite a lot about the direction that Swinson wants to take the Lib Dems.
    If the Remain vote is allying with itself in Remain areas, that puts more pressure on Farage to see sense and do the same for Leave.
    Farage dgaf
    Exactly. He doesn't really want to leave. He loses his gravy train ticket and political relevance.
    I think Farage is rather vulnerble to that point being made loudly and often....
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Perhaps we'll get some polls tonight from the Sunday newspapers.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 62,749
    edited November 2019
    felix said:

    AndyJS said:

    Confirmation that the LDs are to stand aside for the Greens in the Isle of Wight:

    https://twitter.com/iwightnews/status/1190577399664185345

    How can Jo Swinson say she will be PM and stand down candidates in a GE

    Last night's 5 live and question time were not at all kind on 'revoke'

    Not sure it is as good a policy as she thinks it is
    justin124 said:

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    At what point in 2017 - ie how many weeks before the election - did Corbyn start his resurgence? That’s the pattern we should be looking for. If he’s gonna do it again he needs an exact repeat.

    I think it was YouGov, fieldwork on 25/26 April with a 16-point lead compared to the previous 23-point lead. Assume poll published on 27th and that was 42 days before polling day.

    We are 40 days from polling day.

    So it should start around now. Hmm. Makes for a nervy week.
    In their favour they don't start so far behind the Tories, and gains by the Lib Dems and SNP will mean that a small swing to the Tories will still leave them short of a majority. So there's a bit of leeway.

    There will probably be enough polls published in the Sunday papers tomorrow that one of them, randomly, will have good news for Labour. Pretty dire if that's not the case.
    I'd be astonished if there isn't an upswing for Labour after their campaign launch. There'll be a lot of Labour voters who will previously have flirted with other parties who'll use a Corbyn stump speech on telly as a psychological crutch - an excuse for discarding their doubts and reverting to type. You get the general idea - "Well, there were all these stories on the telly about Labour being soft on Europe, economically suicidal and rabidly anti-Semitic - but I liked what Jeremy said about the NHS and the bankers, and he sounds very nice, and I'm sure all the negative stuff people say about Labour is just the work of the biased MSM, and the Liberals are just Tories, and the Greens can never win, so yeah I'm voting Labour because I've always voted Labour in every election ever anyway."

    There was an example of just such a biddable idiot as this who took the time to call into a show I was listening to on 5 Live earlier this week. There are an awful lot of them out there.
    Similar things could be said re-Johnson's closeness to the Arbeit Macht Frei wing of the Tory party.
    Moderator alert! This sort of post really is unacceptable. The only charitable explanation is drunkeness.
    I can only assume Justin has issues but I would agree about your Moderator alert

  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    viewcode said:

    Hah! I like to make stupid points in a stupid way! Which isn't the opposite! That told you, huh!??!!

    [Thinks for a minute. Bugger... :) ]

    Don't think I've ever seen you make an authentically proper stupid point, tbh.

    You did MASSIVELY overrate the chance of No Deal, of course, but you were in good company there. Plenty of this site's very best did that.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,551

    @NickPalmer probably a lot like Blair’s Britain but with less authoritarianism and more electoral reform.

    And more devolution to local authorities including the right to raise their own finance.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,736

    Chris said:

    Nigelb said:

    Byronic said:

    And Sky moved on and featuring the conservatives moratorium on fracking and how popular it will be in the North of England. Yougov poll shows 67% oppose fracking

    It was mentioned last night that Carrie is very much into green issues and it is believed she is behind this and other green policies yet to be announced


    The fracking ban is really clever politics.

    Fracking is dying anyway. Renewables have suddenly reached critical mass, they are about to make fracking in the UK pointlessly difficult and pricey.

    An easy goal for Boris to score.
    It’s not dying any time soon, as it produces the cheapest fossil fuel on the planet. But will quite probably not happen in the UK at all now.

    The issue of the associated earthquakes is just too problematic in a country as intensively populated as England. They've tried it; it doesn't work here. Shame, because as you say it is relatively cheap energy.
    Surely a few earthquakes are "a price well worth paying," if there's profit to be made?
    In Scotland maybe. There are far fewer people to bother in big chunks of it. And you can pay them off.

    But who is going to invest big money in a country threatening to go independent, with no certainty on currency and taxation risk?
    I was attempting satire. I should know better these days.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    edited November 2019
    Roger said:

    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!

    Me too! Chest swelling. Might take it seriously and offer up a couple of ideas. "Citizens Bond" is one that springs to mind. McDonnell in particular might be receptive to that.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,551

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    west oxfordshire (namely Wantage) saw a huge cooperation between LDs and Greens in May so not really a surprise, also a big REMAIN vote but Ed Vaizey the sitting Tory has fairly strong remain credentials so should be a fairly safe Con hold though he was suspended over "that" vote but now back in fold.
    I think Wantage is a clear Tory HOLD.

    Con/Lab/LD/BXP/Grn

    MRP projection 39/15/29/10/6
    My model 45/12/26/11/5
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,551

    Standing against Rosie Duffield but not Anna Soubry or Dominic Grieve is not great optics for the Lib Dems, even if I can see the internal logic of the position.
    I think Labour's chances in Canterbury are higher with a Lib Dem than with clear run.
    Canterbury
    Con/Lab/LD/BXP/Grn
    MRP 32/26/22/11/9
    Model 36/33/17/9/5
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794
    IanB2 said:

    First the crow in Thompson’s bedroom, now the Rugby. The gods aren’t happy with us.

    Yes. The black crow in the locked bedroom. On Hallowe'en. That's not even slightly worrysome. Oh dear me no... :)
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,269
    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,344
    edited November 2019

    felix said:

    AndyJS said:

    Confirmation that the LDs are to stand aside for the Greens in the Isle of Wight:

    https://twitter.com/iwightnews/status/1190577399664185345

    How can Jo Swinson say she will be PM and stand down candidates in a GE

    Last night's 5 live and question time were not at all kind on 'revoke'

    Not sure it is as good a policy as she thinks it is
    justin124 said:

    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    At what point in 2017 - ie how many weeks before the election - did Corbyn start his resurgence? That’s the pattern we should be looking for. If he’s gonna do it again he needs an exact repeat.

    I think it was YouGov, fieldwork on 25/26 April with a 16-point lead compared to the previous 23-point lead. Assume poll published on 27th and that was 42 days before polling day.

    We are 40 days from polling day.

    So it should start around now. Hmm. Makes for a nervy week.
    In their favour they don't start so far behind the Tories, and gains by the Lib Dems and SNP will mean that a small swing to the Tories will still leave them short of a majority. So there's a bit of leeway.

    There will probably be enough polls published in the Sunday papers tomorrow that one of them, randomly, will have good news for Labour. Pretty dire if that's not the case.


    There was an example of just such a biddable idiot as this who took the time to call into a show I was listening to on 5 Live earlier this week. There are an awful lot of them out there.
    Similar things could be said re-Johnson's closeness to the Arbeit Macht Frei wing of the Tory party.
    Moderator alert! This sort of post really is unacceptable. The only charitable explanation is drunkeness.
    I can only assume Justin has issues but I would agree about your Moderator alert

    LD's won the damn seat in living..... at least my..... memory! (refers to IoW..... vanilla strikes again!)
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,551

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    Noo said:

    AndyJS said:

    That's 3 seats where the LDs aren't standing so far.
    Which ones?
    Is Wantage one of those?
    Beaconsfield (Grieve)
    Broxtowe (Soubry)
    Isle of Wight (Greens)
    Sorry, I got it wrong. Wantage will go the other way, Greens standing down. Watch out for Henley, could see the Lib Dems withdrawing there for the Greens.
    Also, Brighton? Norwich? Bristol? Surely at least one of those?
    west oxfordshire (namely Wantage) saw a huge cooperation between LDs and Greens in May so not really a surprise, also a big REMAIN vote but Ed Vaizey the sitting Tory has fairly strong remain credentials so should be a fairly safe Con hold though he was suspended over "that" vote but now back in fold.
    Yes, the winnability of such seats is another thing entirely. But South Oxon is interesting because the Conservatives have been in a state of civil war there and lost the council a few months ago.
    Wantage is not in West Oxfordshire. Witney is however the same as West Oxon.

    Which gives me the chance to say that it is also very remain, with an avowedly Brexit m.p. who is too new to have a personal following. Tories win partly due to a divided opposition - Witney Chipping Norton are Labour but the villages on the edge of Oxford Lib Dem. Tories will probably win not least because Labour have built up a good base in Witney itself. Even so, for the first time, by-elections excepted, it is interesting here.
    Witney
    Con/Lab/LD/BXP/Grn
    MRP 41/12/28/11/7
    Model 47/6/32/11/4
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,928
    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    What's worse is that he's doing this at John Lewis. That's normally the oasis of civilization at Brent Cross.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,344
    edited November 2019
    Within the last few minutes the BBC reports that the Continent is isolated, due to strong winds between Dover and Calais.
  • XtrainXtrain Posts: 341
    IanB2 said:

    Roger said:

    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!

    Let us know if you take him up on it. This is a betting site after all.....
    Surely it’s about time people started paying for the costs of their care home.....? ;)
    Jeremy will announce free care for the elderly. You just have to sign your home over to the state and make spare rooms available to the homeless and Gardens will become community allotments.
    Not so outrageous in an ideal world.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    Noo said:

    Conclusion: concentrating wealth in the hands of a few individuals creates stark risks for the tax base and gives enormous political power to those people. It's not healthy for democracy or the economy to have huge inequalities of wealth.

    OK, but I sense that was not the direction the interesting factoid introducer was going in. I was hoping for a discussion whereby a person's economic value to the nation gets erroneously conflated with the size of their tax bill. That way I could wing in with some corrective nuggets. But it didn't happen. Not this time anyway.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    I would've thought that the staff would have tasered him and thrown him out the tradesman's entrance by now. Standards at John Lewis are obviously slipping, alas.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,428
    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    I blame Boris.
  • kinabalu said:

    Roger said:

    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!

    Me too! Chest swelling. Might take it seriously and offer up a couple of ideas. "Citizens Bond" is one that springs to mind. McDonnell in particular might be receptive to that.
    Is that like a bail bond, to be paid by people rich enough to be considered a flight risk before they travel abroad?
  • PaulMPaulM Posts: 613
    Roger said:

    Just got an email from Jeremy Corbyn. "Would you like to help us write our manifesto Roger"

    Blimey!

    Given your advertising background you should offer to proof read and edit it. Make it readable and quotable as opposed to the usual stuff parties come up with.
    Didn't Labour try a few years back to have a manifesto that was aimed at a broader mass market readership and sold at WH Smiths and the like?
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    edited November 2019

    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    I blame Boris.
    Boris hasn't had the time or Parliamentary backing to pass the Public Execution for Impolite Table Manners Act yet. Give him a chance...

    Anyway, the individual in question probably spent their formative years under a Labour Government.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    What earthly reason could there be for your being in Brent X? I’m guessing you’re waiting for a lift up the M1? It’s the only plausible explanation.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947

    The expropriation of private property (whether paid for at an arbitrary rate, well short of market value, voted through by Parliament, or outright) would be enough to completely destroy the economy on its own. And yes, I'm sure there'd be fountains of cash for Our Beloved NHS, and pretty much everything else, but since it would be about as valuable as sheets of toilet paper (and, indeed, best used as such, since one would otherwise have to queue for four hours at the local Red Star Supermarket to obtain one's ration of the real thing,) this would hardly help.

    The core of the Labour leadership - and most of the mass membership of the party - resemble a bunch of crazed revolutionaries from one of the more radical South American movements. Scandinavian Social Democrats they ain't.

    Frothy. Very frothy.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,928
    Ishmael_Z said:

    Late to David's excellent and informative thread. To add to the 10 points, here are three more that should give Labour cause for concern:

    11. Following each GE, polling companies make adjustments to their methodology to try and avoid repeating past mistakes, and 2017 is no exception. Actual adjustments made since 2017 are summed up by Anthony Wells here: "... in the 2017 election, most of the difference between polls was indeed down to how polling companies predicted likelihood to vote, and this was the biggest cause of polling error. However when those new turnout models backfired and went wrong, polling companies dropped them. There are no longer any companies using demographic based turnout models that have a huge impact on voting intention figures and weight down young people. These days almost everyone has gone back to basing their turnout models primarily on how likely respondents themselves say they are to vote, a filter that typically only has a modest impact."
    http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/10093

    ...

    Whatever your methodology you can *always* produce an infinite number of "improvements" by fine tuning and backtesting. Say your basic method is examining the entrails of chickens. You go back over your data and see whether examinations before or after lunch, or of male vs female chicken entrails, or conducted wearing a swimsuit vs wearing evening dress, were better predictors. Every single parameter you can think of yields an "improvement" in one direction or the other (except a few which give a neutral result, randomness being what it is) without actually making any difference at all to the objective value of your method.
    In data science / machine learning, beginners often make the mistake of "overfitting". This produces a model that deals very well with the training data, but is a poor generalised model.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,428
    @Barnesian what does your model say for Newcastle upon Tyne North?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 56,928
    Chris said:

    PClipp said:



    "They remain conservatives at heart", do they? Tons of wishful thinking there, BigG. Quite the contrary. The more they have to do with people with liberal values, the more Liberal they will become. It is time that everybody who wants to see a liberal society came together in the Liberal Democrats. That applies just as much to liberals still n the Labour Party. And of course that is what people are doing.

    Liberal, like Nick Clegg's thoughts on gay marriage?
    Did Clegg have bad thoughts about gay marriage?
    He was well known for his secret bad thoughts about gay marriage.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,361
    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    Hang around. He'll slurp his coffee from the saucer.

    And it will have chocolate on it.......
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,361
    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Nigelb said:

    Byronic said:

    And Sky moved on and featuring the conservatives moratorium on fracking and how popular it will be in the North of England. Yougov poll shows 67% oppose fracking

    It was mentioned last night that Carrie is very much into green issues and it is believed she is behind this and other green policies yet to be announced


    The fracking ban is really clever politics.

    Fracking is dying anyway. Renewables have suddenly reached critical mass, they are about to make fracking in the UK pointlessly difficult and pricey.

    An easy goal for Boris to score.
    It’s not dying any time soon, as it produces the cheapest fossil fuel on the planet. But will quite probably not happen in the UK at all now.

    The issue of the associated earthquakes is just too problematic in a country as intensively populated as England. They've tried it; it doesn't work here. Shame, because as you say it is relatively cheap energy.
    Surely a few earthquakes are "a price well worth paying," if there's profit to be made?
    In Scotland maybe. There are far fewer people to bother in big chunks of it. And you can pay them off.

    But who is going to invest big money in a country threatening to go independent, with no certainty on currency and taxation risk?
    I was attempting satire. I should know better these days.
    So was I. Thought the Nats would bite......
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    IanB2 said:

    What matters is the number of voters who didn’t vote for you last time who are prepared to consider doing so this time. For Labour, that means they can never win the seat. Indeed a lot of the voters who plumped for them last time are already looking elsewhere.

    It is time that Labour got real. There isn’t going to be a majority Labour Government, ever, again.

    Not you as well, Ian. Usually so calm and reasonable. Truly remarkable final sentence! We only need about 50 more seats than now. Few years of Blondie and Brexit, new leader with new appeal, and you say no chance of winning? C'mon.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,798
    edited November 2019

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Nigelb said:

    Byronic said:

    And Sky moved on and featuring the conservatives moratorium on fracking and how popular it will be in the North of England. Yougov poll shows 67% oppose fracking

    It was mentioned last night that Carrie is very much into green issues and it is believed she is behind this and other green policies yet to be announced


    The fracking ban is really clever politics.

    Fracking is dying anyway. Renewables have suddenly reached critical mass, they are about to make fracking in the UK pointlessly difficult and pricey.

    An easy goal for Boris to score.
    It’s not dying any time soon, as it produces the cheapest fossil fuel on the planet. But will quite probably not happen in the UK at all now.

    The issue of the associated earthquakes is just too problematic in a country as intensively populated as England. They've tried it; it doesn't work here. Shame, because as you say it is relatively cheap energy.
    Surely a few earthquakes are "a price well worth paying," if there's profit to be made?
    In Scotland maybe. There are far fewer people to bother in big chunks of it. And you can pay them off.

    But who is going to invest big money in a country threatening to go independent, with no certainty on currency and taxation risk?
    I was attempting satire. I should know better these days.
    So was I. Thought the Nats would bite......
    Just back from getting my sides stitched up after 'England 2nd half = Boris 2019'. Did I miss anything?
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    Cyclefree said:

    Well, completely off topic: I am in the John Lewis restaurant in Brent X minding my own business with a nice cup of coffee and at the next table there is a man who is eating his lunch in quite the most revolting way imaginable - half with his fingers, half with a fork used as a spade shovelling it all in and spluttering everywhere. Honestly, I’ve seen chimps eat with more grace. How do people become adults without acquiring even the most elementary manners?

    lol - you made me smile! :smile: I cannot laugh as i am in a public place! I once went to a wedding where the people I was sat with started scrapping waste food onto one plate! I did not say anything and funnily enough I did not have any conversation I can remember! Some people do not know any better. But they are still people! A few thousand years ago our ancestors were livining in North Africa or the middle east as hunter gatherers! Indeed Seant wrote a book on it!
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794
    edited November 2019
    kinabalu said:

    Me too! Chest swelling...

    You can get pills for that... :)

  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,551

    @Barnesian what does your model say for Newcastle upon Tyne North?

    @Barnesian what does your model say for Newcastle upon Tyne North?

    @Gallowgate
    Newcastle upon Tyne North

    Con/Lab/LD/BXP/Grn
    MRP 28/32/16/17/5
    Model 26/42/15/13/4
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,361

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Nigelb said:

    Byronic said:

    And Sky moved on and featuring the conservatives moratorium on fracking and how popular it will be in the North of England. Yougov poll shows 67% oppose fracking

    It was mentioned last night that Carrie is very much into green issues and it is believed she is behind this and other green policies yet to be announced


    The fracking ban is really clever politics.

    Fracking is dying anyway. Renewables have suddenly reached critical mass, they are about to make fracking in the UK pointlessly difficult and pricey.

    An easy goal for Boris to score.
    It’s not dying any time soon, as it produces the cheapest fossil fuel on the planet. But will quite probably not happen in the UK at all now.

    The issue of the associated earthquakes is just too problematic in a country as intensively populated as England. They've tried it; it doesn't work here. Shame, because as you say it is relatively cheap energy.
    Surely a few earthquakes are "a price well worth paying," if there's profit to be made?
    In Scotland maybe. There are far fewer people to bother in big chunks of it. And you can pay them off.

    But who is going to invest big money in a country threatening to go independent, with no certainty on currency and taxation risk?
    I was attempting satire. I should know better these days.
    So was I. Thought the Nats would bite......
    Just back from getting my sides stitched up after 'England 2nd half = Boris 2019'. Did I miss anything?
    Time will tell about my prophesy skills......
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,428
    Barnesian said:

    @Barnesian what does your model say for Newcastle upon Tyne North?

    @Barnesian what does your model say for Newcastle upon Tyne North?

    @Gallowgate
    Newcastle upon Tyne North

    Con/Lab/LD/BXP/Grn
    MRP 28/32/16/17/5
    Model 26/42/15/13/4
    Bloody hell that MRP prediction is too close for comfort.

    I hope your model is right. Looks like I’m going to have to vote Labour.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 21,794
    edited November 2019

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Nigelb said:

    Byronic said:

    And Sky moved on and featuring the conservatives moratorium on fracking and how popular it will be in the North of England. Yougov poll shows 67% oppose fracking

    It was mentioned last night that Carrie is very much into green issues and it is believed she is behind this and other green policies yet to be announced


    The fracking ban is really clever politics.

    Fracking is dying anyway. Renewables have suddenly reached critical mass, they are about to make fracking in the UK pointlessly difficult and pricey.

    An easy goal for Boris to score.
    It’s not dying any time soon, as it produces the cheapest fossil fuel on the planet. But will quite probably not happen in the UK at all now.

    The issue of the associated earthquakes is just too problematic in a country as intensively populated as England. They've tried it; it doesn't work here. Shame, because as you say it is relatively cheap energy.
    Surely a few earthquakes are "a price well worth paying," if there's profit to be made?
    In Scotland maybe. There are far fewer people to bother in big chunks of it. And you can pay them off.

    But who is going to invest big money in a country threatening to go independent, with no certainty on currency and taxation risk?
    I was attempting satire. I should know better these days.
    So was I. Thought the Nats would bite......
    Just back from getting my sides stitched up after 'England 2nd half = Boris 2019'. Did I miss anything?
    Time will tell about my prophesy skills......
    Which is, in itself, a prophecy... :)
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 41,947
    Chris said:

    I see Trump described one of his political opponents as a poor bastard who quit(ted) like a dog.

    I just hope he's wrong in his assumption that that kind of language will be appealing to the US electorate.

    Ditto in spades. The guy is a truly bottom drawer specimen. Can the good people of America really do that again? I don't think so. If they do - well let's not even go there.
  • Sean_F said:

    MaxPB said:

    Foxy said:

    malcolmg said:

    AndyJS said:

    Confirmation that the LDs are to stand aside for the Greens in the Isle of Wight:

    https://twitter.com/iwightnews/status/1190577399664185345

    Funny how all the disgruntled Tories are flocking to the Lib Dems, they see it as the other Tory party.
    It really is simple. You win elections by getting people to support you who didn't in the last election. So 22% of 2017 Lab voters, thank you very much and 10% of 2017 Con voters and a few MPs are welcome imo.
    The MPs you've welcomed - you're welcome to them!
    Indeed. Honestly I'm glad we've managed to get rid of them, they will cause exactly the same trouble for the Lib Dems when they see a policy they don't like. They want it to be all about them, not the party.
    There is a point not discussed but if any of these ex conservative mps get elected as liberals, apart from Brexit, they remain conservatives at heart and in a tight HOC they would be likely to support a lot of the conservative manifesto

    I am not sure that is the case. It may well be ex-smoker syndrome, where those who have given up the habit are the most fanatical critics.
    In the case of Dominic Grieve, Philip Lee, Guto Bebb, Sarah Wollaston, I think they've wanted Out of the Conservative Party for a long time, and in the case of Heidi Allen, she only joined it by accident.
    I agree with all of that except Dominic Grieve.

    I think he's a Conservative, albeit a solid Remainer, and one nation one, and still exhibits levels of social conservatism over some matters.

    More accurate to call him a male version of Anna Soubry. He thinks no price is too high to stop Brexit.
  • I'm not sure I can be arsed building a model.

    Instead, I'm going to scan Tory, Lab and LD target seats and use "informed gut instinct", qualified by views and intelligence posted on here.
  • Within the last few minutes the BBC reports that the Continent is isolated, due to strong winds between Dover and Calais.

    So Brexit has happened
This discussion has been closed.