Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Boris Johnson Invites Himself to the Battle of Ipsus

123468

Comments

  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,071

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    You just have no idea! Corbyn's Labour will be eviscerated. I have seen it myself- Corbyn is "poison on the doorstep"

    Get rid of him whilst you still have a chance..
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    edited August 2019

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    You just have no idea! Corbyn's Labour will be eviscerated. I have seen it myself- Corbyn is "poison on the doorstep"

    Get rid of him whilst you still have a chance..
    Seen it where? I am not a Labour supporter.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,770
    glw said:

    FF43 said:

    The Cummings/Johnson strategy may work, but it depends totally on people who hate their guts doing exactly what C/J want them to do: Political opponents to grant them an election that favours them. Labour voters to switch to the Lib Dems because they don't like Brexit and accidentally voting in a Conservative instead.

    I'm getting extremely fed up with ERG types talking about the government calling an election, as though the government can do such a thing anymore
    I tend to give most people the benefit of the doubt and assume when they say the gov should call an election they mean call for an election, which they presume the opposition will back on the basis of looking cowardly if they don't.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,995
    Elections don’t necessarily result in the expected. Except in dictatorships.
  • Options

    Scott_P said:
    Another example of the crass stupidity of our mps, All police at Downing Street are armed

    It is not as if she was handcuffed and weapons drawn
    Actually that's not true, not all police in Number 10 are armed, they weren't armed when I visited.

    Plus when Operation Temperer was activated in 2017 the reason was to replace unarmed officers with armed soldiers and Downing Street saw their unarmed officers replaces with soldiers
    Thank you and I accept your comment

    However, it is still far too dramatic to say that she was escorted out by armed officers.

    It depends on the personnel available at the time
    The general consensus is of those who I know who have worked in Downing Street/the cabinet office is you only call on the armed officers if there's a clear and present security threat, there's always enough unarmed officers about, otherwise the whole security of Downing Street wouldn't work.
  • Options

    Boris will get an election and he will win.

    The remainers are absolutely delusional about their chances.

    I believe Alexander Johnson has no chance of winning a majority !
    Well, who knows....?

    In which case the bookies, with 30-40% odds on a Con majority,vare easy money for you.....
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    Elections don’t necessarily result in the expected. Except in dictatorships.

    Apparently vast numbers of Tories have somehow failed to grasp that fact.
  • Options
    OllyTOllyT Posts: 4,913

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course the opposition MPs know Cummings is trying to goad them into an election. They also know he is desperate for that election to be BEFORE the sh1t hits the fan on October 31st.

    Beyond that date he will have either opted for a deal and Farage's mob will be on the march with their pitchforks or he has opted for a chaotic No Deal exit. Once he goes past Oct 31st the prospects of a big election win become far less certain.
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,770
    Trying to predict what will happen if there is an election is pointless IMHO. Maybe the Brexit Party votes will mostly go Tory and Johnson will win a massive majority and start his glorious 20 year rule. Or maybe loads of Lib Dem votes will go to Labour and Corbyn wins a majority. Or maybe aliens from the planet Zargog will invade and turn us all into cyborgs.
  • Options

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    edited August 2019

    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    No. Boris will then be in a stronger position.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    TGOHF said:


    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    No. Boris will then be in a stronger position.
    When the shelves are sparse and the sheep are burning?
  • Options
    TabmanTabman Posts: 1,046
    Cyclefree said:

    TGOHF said:

    To be honest there are so many utterly barmy things being said and tweeted there is little doubt the whole country has gone round the bend

    At least with those political geeks repetitively fighting their own unyielding corner

    However, I have news for them, the vast majority are not into the detail but they are wanting this stopped. Arguing over further extensions ( which I agree with ) is not winning the public battle, as seen in the polls and is ironically strengthening Boris nee Cummings

    Boris has a clear message we are out on the 31st October and that is what people want to hear and frankly they do not care too much for the consequences. I have several anecdotes along these lines

    Indeed Big G - this is the reason Boris will not delay beyond 31st. Ending the uncertainty is a bigger prize than the method of leaving.
    Boris would be ending one uncertainty only to replace it by an even bigger uncertainty: about the basis on which pretty much all our trade and other interactions with the world outside these islands will be done. Especially as even the legislation necessary for a No Deal exit will not have been completed by 31 October.

    So to take two examples from my current project: an investigation team currently based in the UK does investigations for other EU countries and receives data from those countries to do so. It also sends people to those countries when necessary to carry out those investigations.

    Post 31 October it is wholly unclear whether it can continue to operate in that way. The likelihood is not. The entity’s risk has just gone up considerably because it now has to manage those investigations in a different way at short notice - and finding skilled investigators in those EU countries is not an easy task. The likelihood is that some of the jobs currently located in London, Leeds and Scotland will need to be moved overseas. That’s just one tiny bit of one very large organisation facing uncertainty and costs and reorganisation and a likely loss of UK jobs.

    It won’t mean visible chaos on day one so Brexiteers will crow about Project Fear having been overstated again. But the effects of that uncertainty will be there and will accumulate over time. It is foolish to suppose otherwise. You may think it worth it.

    But let’s not pretend that any sort of uncertainty is ending on 31 October or that this will be the end of Brexit.
    Very few people understand these sorts of complexities. They think manufacturing has a local supply chain. They don't work in multinational businesses with high numbers of EU employees, as I do.

    I work on a lot of EU contracts and life is much more difficult and uncertain.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    Trapped? If Boris is in office then we leave 31 October.

    You need to remove Boris if you want a change.
    You may be about to discover your mistake on that.
    Just an honest question Alastair.

    Do you think a GE now would change the overall numbers and by default the deadlock
    No - I suspect the SNP will pick up seats (probably 8 Tory seats), Lib Dems will pick up seats (20 or so from the Tories) and Labour may lose some to the Tories.

    I don't think the numbers will change though, just some chairs...
  • Options
    Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 7,981
    Cyclefree said:



    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant databases to check this information?
    Oh... you and your facts!

    We will simply wave our hands in the air and bluster. That will sort it!
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,071

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    It is. I spotted that. It will be interesting to see whether a challenge will be made to those powers. Certainly any sort of Brexit - and especially a No Deal one - will be a bonanza for lawyers.

    So not all bad then. :)
  • Options
    Scott_P said:
    What was it when Major made Maastricht a confidence matter Sherlock?
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    You just have no idea! Corbyn's Labour will be eviscerated. I have seen it myself- Corbyn is "poison on the doorstep"

    Get rid of him whilst you still have a chance..
    Seen it where? I am not a Labour supporter.
    I did think that was rather funny
  • Options
    OllyT said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course the opposition MPs know Cummings is trying to goad them into an election. They also know he is desperate for that election to be BEFORE the sh1t hits the fan on October 31st.

    Beyond that date he will have either opted for a deal and Farage's mob will be on the march with their pitchforks or he has opted for a chaotic No Deal exit. Once he goes past Oct 31st the prospects of a big election win become far less certain.
    No no no...Dont you get it?

    If the oppo take control BEFORE then, then it is no longer BoJo's responsibility. If its immediately afterwards then the adverse effects will still not have been fully felt and he will still win. It Brexit is delayed then no one now is going to blame Con Leavers. They will blame Lab, Con remainers and LDs (in that order). Farage's fox has already been shot. Hence the 10-15 point lead for the Cons in the polls.

    Remain is trapped.
  • Options
    TGOHF said:


    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    No. Boris will then be in a stronger position.
    Exactly.
  • Options

    Scott_P said:
    Another example of the crass stupidity of our mps, All police at Downing Street are armed

    It is not as if she was handcuffed and weapons drawn
    Actually that's not true, not all police in Number 10 are armed, they weren't armed when I visited.

    Plus when Operation Temperer was activated in 2017 the reason was to replace unarmed officers with armed soldiers and Downing Street saw their unarmed officers replaces with soldiers
    Thank you and I accept your comment

    However, it is still far too dramatic to say that she was escorted out by armed officers.

    It depends on the personnel available at the time
    The general consensus is of those who I know who have worked in Downing Street/the cabinet office is you only call on the armed officers if there's a clear and present security threat, there's always enough unarmed officers about, otherwise the whole security of Downing Street wouldn't work.
    Thank you
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    BXP will take enough votes to ensure the Tories don't win the Leave seats they need and won't win any seats at the same time.
  • Options

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
  • Options
    Really pleased about this
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    He can LEAVE.

    You mean resign.

    Awesome.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,071

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    edited August 2019

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    Edit: replied too quickly and didn’t read properly. My bad.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,970

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    And then what?
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,288
    Cumming's reign of Terror, he'll frame that.

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1167918146025443328/photo/1
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
  • Options

    Really pleased about this
    Me too :)
  • Options
    Dominic Cummings is a just a pound shop Damian McBride.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    Tabman said:

    Cyclefree said:

    TGOHF said:

    Indeed Big G - this is the reason Boris will not delay beyond 31st. Ending the uncertainty is a bigger prize than the method of leaving.
    Boris would be ending one uncertainty only to replace it by an even bigger uncertainty: about the basis on which pretty much all our trade and other interactions with the world outside these islands will be done. Especially as even the legislation necessary for a No Deal exit will not have been completed by 31 October.

    So to take two examples from my current project: an investigation team currently based in the UK does investigations for other EU countries and receives data from those countries to do so. It also sends people to those countries when necessary to carry out those investigations.

    Post 31 October it is wholly unclear whether it can continue to operate in that way. The likelihood is not. The entity’s risk has just gone up considerably because it now has to manage those investigations in a different way at short notice - and finding skilled investigators in those EU countries is not an easy task. The likelihood is that some of the jobs currently located in London, Leeds and Scotland will need to be moved overseas. That’s just one tiny bit of one very large organisation facing uncertainty and costs and reorganisation and a likely loss of UK jobs.

    It won’t mean visible chaos on day one so Brexiteers will crow about Project Fear having been overstated again. But the effects of that uncertainty will be there and will accumulate over time. It is foolish to suppose otherwise. You may think it worth it.

    But let’s not pretend that any sort of uncertainty is ending on 31 October or that this will be the end of Brexit.
    Very few people understand these sorts of complexities. They think manufacturing has a local supply chain. They don't work in multinational businesses with high numbers of EU employees, as I do.

    I work on a lot of EU contracts and life is much more difficult and uncertain.
    I don’t blame people for not understanding these complexities. I do blame them for not listening to those who do understand these matters. And then accusing them of being fanatics when they try and point out the difficulties and ask reasonable questions about how these issues are going to be dealt with.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
  • Options
    Cyclefree said:


    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    How about proceeding the same way that the USA does to keep out EU citizens who have committed crimes without access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    And to win those seats he needs the BXP not to stand in those seats - the opposition however needs the BXP to stand.

    So that's the current battle for the next week
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,150
    edited August 2019


    And he cant be removed without putting Corbyn (or a Corbyn acolyte) in charge....Which will utterly destroy Con Remainers and the LDs.

    Putting aside some of the other assumptions in this, an open question that I don't know the answer to is: What does putting Corbyn in do to Con Rebels and LDs.

    I *think* he would be quite scrupulous at playing the role. He's put on a proper suit, visit the Queen and accept the role without attempting to abolish her, look sensible and official when conferring with other heads of state, and if there was some kind of national incident (a shooting or a terrorist attack or whatever) read his script like a serious PM. He would likely accept the restrictions of purdah without giving Britain's nuclear deterrent to Hamas or nationalizing Tescos. This would all be very good for his ratings, which currently price in a whole lot of lunacy and terribleness.

    LD targets are currently nearly all Tory-held seats, so a more respectable Corbyn would probably not be a problem for them. The question is then whether Tory Remainiacs would begrudge them for putting Corbyn in. Until this week I'd have said they would, but with Boris looking (to liberals and pro-stability conservatives) seriously dangerous even beyond the EU issue, and everything polarizing on remain-leave lines, I'm not so sure any more.
  • Options
    Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 7,981

    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?

    He can LEAVE.
    But dare he? Johnson seems to be doing the darnedest to provoke others in starting an election or blocking Brexit.

    What if no one grants him that election? Will he really have the nerve to Leave?

    Remember, he is seeing all the information about what a mess Brexit will make. Do you think he is really the kind of politician to face up to a mess of his own making? Particularly a giantic mess?
  • Options
    eek said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    Trapped? If Boris is in office then we leave 31 October.

    You need to remove Boris if you want a change.
    You may be about to discover your mistake on that.
    Just an honest question Alastair.

    Do you think a GE now would change the overall numbers and by default the deadlock
    No - I suspect the SNP will pick up seats (probably 8 Tory seats), Lib Dems will pick up seats (20 or so from the Tories) and Labour may lose some to the Tories.

    I don't think the numbers will change though, just some chairs...
    Agreed but I expect a nett loss for labour, hit hard in Scotland and possibly Wales, conservatives winning leave seats and lib dems doing very well in London and the South
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Dominic Cummings is a just a pound shop Damian McBride.

    Lol - tell me about McBrides epic success in achieving a legacy for Gordon Brown - wibble wibble..
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    HYUFD said:
    The sooner we have an election the better IMO.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,788

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
    He's not bluffing. He intends to leave. If the EU offered him a deal he would turn it down on a pretext.
  • Options
    dixiedean said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    And then what?
    With a majority of 1? An election shortly thereafter....

    The problem for Labour is that it is now associated in the 'remain public's mind as a 'leave 'party, and in the 'leave' public's mind as a 'remain' party. Which is why Cummings wants to fight them. This is really not a 'leave/remain' partisan point but a statement of fact.

    All the "red mist" and endless angry remain articles on PB from Smithson, Cyclefree, Herdson et al.....are PART of the Cummings strategy. And they dont even realise it!.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    dr_spyn said:

    Cumming's reign of Terror, he'll frame that.

    https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1167918146025443328/photo/1


    The civil service must furious about stuff getting done.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981

    Cyclefree said:


    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    How about proceeding the same way that the USA does to keep out EU citizens who have committed crimes without access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    The US has relevant access to most appropriate data. I've witnessed a lot of interesting conversations while waiting in line.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited August 2019

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
  • Options
    AndyJS said:

    HYUFD said:
    The sooner we have an election the better IMO.
    quite
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    TGOHF said:
    Now is not the time for this sh*t.
  • Options
    OllyTOllyT Posts: 4,913
    edited August 2019

    OllyT said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course the opposition MPs know Cummings is trying to goad them into an election. They also know he is desperate for that election to be BEFORE the sh1t hits the fan on October 31st.

    Beyond that date he will have either opted for a deal and Farage's mob will be on the march with their pitchforks or he has opted for a chaotic No Deal exit. Once he goes past Oct 31st the prospects of a big election win become far less certain.
    No no no...Dont you get it?

    If the oppo take control BEFORE then, then it is no longer BoJo's responsibility. If its immediately afterwards then the adverse effects will still not have been fully felt and he will still win. It Brexit is delayed then no one now is going to blame Con Leavers. They will blame Lab, Con remainers and LDs (in that order). Farage's fox has already been shot. Hence the 10-15 point lead for the Cons in the polls.

    Remain is trapped.
    Just stop telling everyone else that they don't get it and implying we are stupid. Nobody knows how this is going to pan out, w all have different views and yours have no greater validity than anyone else's.

    In my opinion Cummings wants an election before Oct 31st hence his ever more desperate antics to goad parliament into doing what he wants. If parliament doesn't oblige then I think you will find that it is Cummings that is trapped as Oct 31st rolls around.

    Polls taken before we know what Cummings actually does on Oct 31st are practically meaningless. Have you forgotten that May started her election campaign with a 20 point lead?
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,454
    edited August 2019
    TGOHF said:

    Dominic Cummings is a just a pound shop Damian McBride.

    Lol - tell me about McBrides epic success in achieving a legacy for Gordon Brown - wibble wibble..
    What's the legacy he's achieved for Boris Johnson, he might end up as the shortest serving PM since Canning?

    Last time Cummings worked for a government/cabinet minister within in months he turned Gove into the country's most unpopular politician.
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,770
    That article is 4 years old. Also the person who tweeted it is a "Trump supporting Brit Vet".
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,770
    AndyJS said:

    HYUFD said:
    The sooner we have an election the better IMO.
    Funny, I take the opposite view, given there is no certainty that it will make the situation any less fractious or enable a resolution. It's just another diversionary and delaying tactic.
    eek said:

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    And to win those seats he needs the BXP not to stand in those seats - the opposition however needs the BXP to stand.

    So that's the current battle for the next week
    Presumably at least part of the thinking behind floating the idea of casting out anyone who votes for an extension - the idea perhaps being that BXP might not stand candidates in a great many places if they are assured the candidate is committed enough to no deal, but unless those who resist that are cast out they might stand even against all but the most committed Brexiteers, on the basis that you cannot trust them given other candidates standing for the Tories.
  • Options
    eggegg Posts: 1,749

    eek said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    Trapped? If Boris is in office then we leave 31 October.

    You need to remove Boris if you want a change.
    You may be about to discover your mistake on that.
    Just an honest question Alastair.

    Do you think a GE now would change the overall numbers and by default the deadlock
    No - I suspect the SNP will pick up seats (probably 8 Tory seats), Lib Dems will pick up seats (20 or so from the Tories) and Labour may lose some to the Tories.

    I don't think the numbers will change though, just some chairs...
    Agreed but I expect a nett loss for labour, hit hard in Scotland and possibly Wales, conservatives winning leave seats and lib dems doing very well in London and the South
    I say ignore the polls. It all feels fake to me. Boris will lose. An election campaign will show him up as the biggest clearest threat to households with his no deal brexit. As soon as the snap election is called, new leader bounce Boris, his government, Cummings grid all gets elbowed aside as all the opposition parties get their oxygen of publicity too and

    1. The remain parties would be hammering threat to households and the economy of No Deal Brexit
    2. Farage would be insisting Clean Break brexit is the only true brexit, Johnson’s negotiation a con trick and sell out.
    3. And if you don’t like anti semitism and don’t like brexit and you clearly have labour MP feels same as you and hasn’t supported Corbyn, why exactly are you deserting that MP in droves? I expect many of them to pile more votes on.

    Whatever current polls point at certainly ain’t underwritten by any Gold Standard.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
  • Options
    viewcode said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
    He's not bluffing. He intends to leave. If the EU offered him a deal he would turn it down on a pretext.
    No. He would prefer a deal. But he will leave without one if necessary. There is no domestic political downside for him either way now.

    That is the beauty (for him) of his post-May strategy....
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079

    viewcode said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
    He's not bluffing. He intends to leave. If the EU offered him a deal he would turn it down on a pretext.
    No. He would prefer a deal. But he will leave without one if necessary. There is no domestic political downside for him either way now.

    That is the beauty (for him) of his post-May strategy....
    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981
    It's worth remembering that Margaret Beckett is a very possible compromise candidate if Corbyn isn't acceptable (as she is acceptable to Corbyn)..

    I have money on her for exactly that reason..
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205

    Cyclefree said:


    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    How about proceeding the same way that the USA does to keep out EU citizens who have committed crimes without access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    And the details of that procedure are?

    Bear in mind that there are data sharing agreements currently in place between the EU and the USA. So a post-Brexit Britain will not be in the same position as the USA because it won’t have any data-sharing agreements in place. The EU has already said that such an agreement cannot be part of any FTA as data is not considered to be trade.

    Anyway, in your own time ......
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited August 2019
    eek said:

    Cyclefree said:


    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    How about proceeding the same way that the USA does to keep out EU citizens who have committed crimes without access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    The US has relevant access to most appropriate data. I've witnessed a lot of interesting conversations while waiting in line.
    The US actually relies upon self-declaration for most of it.

    They ask you to declare if you have a criminal record and if you say no they don't have access to check if you're lying or not but they're counting on some who have criminal records declaring it honestly.

    And if you lie, enter the USA under false pretences, then get caught committing a crime and they check the records via Interpol and find out you lied on your paperwork then that is an additional offence you can be charged with.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,770

    viewcode said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
    He's not bluffing. He intends to leave. If the EU offered him a deal he would turn it down on a pretext.
    No. He would prefer a deal. But he will leave without one if necessary. There is no domestic political downside for him either way now.

    That is the beauty (for him) of his post-May strategy....
    You keep changing what you say the strategy is.

    Good night all.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,770

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    It might. But not by enough in most of them, given the starting position.
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    My experience is that this "hatred" ( a bad and unpleasant word in politics, dont you think) has been somewhat lessened in recent years by a countervailing "hatred" of the new London metropolitan Labour Party as exemplified by Corbyn?

    Just a thought...
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,970
    CatMan said:

    That article is 4 years old. Also the person who tweeted it is a "Trump supporting Brit Vet".
    Unlikely. British people don't use the word Brit. And vets, of course, are animal doctors. So double fail.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    Whereabouts?
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?

    He must be deputising for HYUFD. I can't take comments like that seriously.

    Time to go.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341
    CatMan said:

    Trying to predict what will happen if there is an election is pointless IMHO. Maybe the Brexit Party votes will mostly go Tory and Johnson will win a massive majority and start his glorious 20 year rule. Or maybe loads of Lib Dem votes will go to Labour and Corbyn wins a majority. Or maybe aliens from the planet Zargog will invade and turn us all into cyborgs.

    Trying to predict what will happen in an election is literally the point of this site!
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981
    dixiedean said:

    CatMan said:

    That article is 4 years old. Also the person who tweeted it is a "Trump supporting Brit Vet".
    Unlikely. British people don't use the word Brit. And vets, of course, are animal doctors. So double fail.
    The Trump supporting Brit Vet was a polite way of saying Cummings or Cummings backer backed twitter bot.
  • Options

    viewcode said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
    He's not bluffing. He intends to leave. If the EU offered him a deal he would turn it down on a pretext.
    No. He would prefer a deal. But he will leave without one if necessary. There is no domestic political downside for him either way now.

    That is the beauty (for him) of his post-May strategy....
    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?
    1) any election will be before then, and anyway...
    2) thus wont happen.

    I look forward to continuing this exchange in the weeks after 31st Oct....
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,125

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    Labour in Scotland used to think that.

    Labour in Wales used to think that.
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    Which is moot. So too are many inner city highly Remain places like inner London and Liverpool.

    What matters are the swing seats. Is Boris targeting swing voters in swing seats?
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,970
    edited August 2019
    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    CatMan said:

    That article is 4 years old. Also the person who tweeted it is a "Trump supporting Brit Vet".
    Unlikely. British people don't use the word Brit. And vets, of course, are animal doctors. So double fail.
    The Trump supporting Brit Vet was a polite way of saying Cummings or Cummings backer backed twitter bot.
    Unlikely to be Cummings directly. He can surely get the basics of vernacular correct.
    Edit. Get you now. durrrr...
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    My experience is that this "hatred" ( a bad and unpleasant word in politics, dont you think) has been somewhat lessened in recent years by a countervailing "hatred" of the new London metropolitan Labour Party as exemplified by Corbyn?

    Just a thought...
    Nope - Corbyn is liked around here as you could witness at this years (and previous years) Durham Miner's Gala.
  • Options
    glw said:

    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?

    He must be deputising for HYUFD. I can't take comments like that seriously.

    Time to go.
    cheerio...
  • Options

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    Labour in Scotland used to think that.

    Labour in Wales used to think that.
    Quite

    There is nowadays considerable "hatred" for Corbyn's Labour in the NW
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981
    dixiedean said:

    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    CatMan said:

    That article is 4 years old. Also the person who tweeted it is a "Trump supporting Brit Vet".
    Unlikely. British people don't use the word Brit. And vets, of course, are animal doctors. So double fail.
    The Trump supporting Brit Vet was a polite way of saying Cummings or Cummings backer backed twitter bot.
    Unlikely to be Cummings directly. He can surely get the basics of vernacular correct.
    It's outsourced to a cheap provider - it's hard to get your english right when you main language is Russian..
  • Options
    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:


    So Priti "Hanging" Patel's first policy is in tatters.
    Good :)

    This is a much smarter way to make changes.
    Really. And how is the government going to keep out EU citizens who have been jailed for 12 months when it will no longer have access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    How about proceeding the same way that the USA does to keep out EU citizens who have committed crimes without access to the relevant EU databases to check this information?
    And the details of that procedure are?

    Bear in mind that there are data sharing agreements currently in place between the EU and the USA. So a post-Brexit Britain will not be in the same position as the USA because it won’t have any data-sharing agreements in place. The EU has already said that such an agreement cannot be part of any FTA as data is not considered to be trade.

    Anyway, in your own time ......
    See my reply to eek.

    Long story short: Ask people to declare if they have a criminal conviction of longer than 12 months.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,071

    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?

    1) any election will be before then, and anyway...
    2) thus wont happen.

    I look forward to continuing this exchange in the weeks after 31st Oct....
    For an election to happen before October 31st it needs to be called before parliament is prorogued. If parliament is prorogued without having forced Boris to extend or given him an election, he'll be stuffed.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    OllyT said:

    OllyT said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course the opposition MPs know Cummings is trying to goad them into an election. They also know he is desperate for that election to be BEFORE the sh1t hits the fan on October 31st.

    Beyond that date he will have either opted for a deal and Farage's mob will be on the march with their pitchforks or he has opted for a chaotic No Deal exit. Once he goes past Oct 31st the prospects of a big election win become far less certain.
    No no no...Dont you get it?

    If the oppo take control BEFORE then, then it is no longer BoJo's responsibility. If its immediately afterwards then the adverse effects will still not have been fully felt and he will still win. It Brexit is delayed then no one now is going to blame Con Leavers. They will blame Lab, Con remainers and LDs (in that order). Farage's fox has already been shot. Hence the 10-15 point lead for the Cons in the polls.

    Remain is trapped.
    Just stop telling everyone else that they don't get it and implying we are stupid. Nobody knows how this is going to pan out, w all have different views and yours have no greater validity than anyone else's.

    In my opinion Cummings wants an election before Oct 31st hence his ever more desperate antics to goad parliament into doing what he wants. If parliament doesn't oblige then I think you will find that it is Cummings that is trapped as Oct 31st rolls around.

    Polls taken before we know what Cummings actually does on Oct 31st are practically meaningless. Have you forgotten that May started her election campaign with a 20 point lead?
    I don’t think they want an election until after Brexit - very simple campaign if we are out.

    The guys who did it vs the numb nuts who want to rejoin.
  • Options
    CatManCatMan Posts: 2,770

    CatMan said:

    Trying to predict what will happen if there is an election is pointless IMHO. Maybe the Brexit Party votes will mostly go Tory and Johnson will win a massive majority and start his glorious 20 year rule. Or maybe loads of Lib Dem votes will go to Labour and Corbyn wins a majority. Or maybe aliens from the planet Zargog will invade and turn us all into cyborgs.

    Trying to predict what will happen in an election is literally the point of this site!
    Well yes, I guess! :D

    Here's my prediction (if it's before 31s Oct): Tories win an overall majority (but not too big), Labour lose a few seats, Lib Dems win a few.

    There!
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    viewcode said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course he wants an election. But he can’t get one without the cooperation of his opponents. They’re unlikely to give it
    Which means Corbyn a PM for 6 months. WHICH DESTROYS CON REMAINERS AND THE LIB DEMS WHEN THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN APRIL.

    Just how dense are you people?

    Not at all. Boris Johnson can be trapped in office.
    You just dont get it all.
    If parliament is prorogued without having taken No Deal off the table or giving Johnson an election, will his strategy have failed?
    It really wont. Because someone has to govern. And if that is not the Cons then it must include Labour, with all the oppo parties in the SHORT interregnum becoming tainted by association.

    Cummings WANTS to fight a Corbyn-led Party. Even better a government that includes a Corbyn-led Labour...
    I think you missed my point. If the opposition sit on their hands and collectively say, "Ok, Boris, let's see if threatening No Deal forces the EU to capitulate," what can he do?
    He can LEAVE.
    He's told everyone that if the EU believe we will leave with No Deal, they will buckle. What will he do if he comes back from the European Council meeting empty handed? He's bluffing.
    He's not bluffing. He intends to leave. If the EU offered him a deal he would turn it down on a pretext.
    No. He would prefer a deal. But he will leave without one if necessary. There is no domestic political downside for him either way now.

    That is the beauty (for him) of his post-May strategy....
    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?
    Don’t forget the boiling seas and the plagues of locusts.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,981
    TGOHF said:

    OllyT said:

    OllyT said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course the opposition MPs know Cummings is trying to goad them into an election. They also know he is desperate for that election to be BEFORE the sh1t hits the fan on October 31st.

    Beyond that date he will have either opted for a deal and Farage's mob will be on the march with their pitchforks or he has opted for a chaotic No Deal exit. Once he goes past Oct 31st the prospects of a big election win become far less certain.
    No no no...Dont you get it?

    If the oppo take control BEFORE then, then it is no longer BoJo's responsibility. If its immediately afterwards then the adverse effects will still not have been fully felt and he will still win. It Brexit is delayed then no one now is going to blame Con Leavers. They will blame Lab, Con remainers and LDs (in that order). Farage's fox has already been shot. Hence the 10-15 point lead for the Cons in the polls.

    Remain is trapped.
    Just stop telling everyone else that they don't get it and implying we are stupid. Nobody knows how this is going to pan out, w all have different views and yours have no greater validity than anyone else's.

    In my opinion Cummings wants an election before Oct 31st hence his ever more desperate antics to goad parliament into doing what he wants. If parliament doesn't oblige then I think you will find that it is Cummings that is trapped as Oct 31st rolls around.

    Polls taken before we know what Cummings actually does on Oct 31st are practically meaningless. Have you forgotten that May started her election campaign with a 20 point lead?
    I don’t think they want an election until after Brexit - very simple campaign if we are out.

    The guys who did it vs the numb nuts who want to rejoin.
    If we are out without a deal - that campaign may go rather differently than you think.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,970
    eek said:

    It's worth remembering that Margaret Beckett is a very possible compromise candidate if Corbyn isn't acceptable (as she is acceptable to Corbyn)..

    I have money on her for exactly that reason..
    There are a few in that category.
    Bring back Red Ed I say. The Tories are already implementing his policies anyway.
    Plus, I am fascinated to see what real "chaos" looks like.
  • Options
    eek said:

    TGOHF said:

    OllyT said:

    OllyT said:

    I am beginning to think that if Boris nee Cummings frames this as a remain parliament obstructing the vote and he has no choice but to call a GE to put democracy and the people first v the HOC, the elite, HOL and the EU he could just win

    He will win. This thread is an echo chamber and just doesnt get it.

    Cummings WANTS an election. That has been the plan all along. Jeez....

    Of course the opposition MPs know Cummings is trying to goad them into an election. They also know he is desperate for that election to be BEFORE the sh1t hits the fan on October 31st.

    Beyond that date he will have either opted for a deal and Farage's mob will be on the march with their pitchforks or he has opted for a chaotic No Deal exit. Once he goes past Oct 31st the prospects of a big election win become far less certain.
    No no no...Dont you get it?

    If the oppo take control BEFORE then, then it is no longer BoJo's responsibility. If its immediately afterwards then the adverse effects will still not have been fully felt and he will still win. It Brexit is delayed then no one now is going to blame Con Leavers. They will blame Lab, Con remainers and LDs (in that order). Farage's fox has already been shot. Hence the 10-15 point lead for the Cons in the polls.

    Remain is trapped.
    Just stop telling everyone else that they don't get it and implying we are stupid. Nobody knows how this is going to pan out, w all have different views and yours have no greater validity than anyone else's.

    In my opinion Cummings wants an election before Oct 31st hence his ever more desperate antics to goad parliament into doing what he wants. If parliament doesn't oblige then I think you will find that it is Cummings that is trapped as Oct 31st rolls around.

    Polls taken before we know what Cummings actually does on Oct 31st are practically meaningless. Have you forgotten that May started her election campaign with a 20 point lead?
    I don’t think they want an election until after Brexit - very simple campaign if we are out.

    The guys who did it vs the numb nuts who want to rejoin.
    If we are out without a deal - that campaign may go rather differently than you think.
    Or it might not.
  • Options
    dixiedean said:

    eek said:

    It's worth remembering that Margaret Beckett is a very possible compromise candidate if Corbyn isn't acceptable (as she is acceptable to Corbyn)..

    I have money on her for exactly that reason..
    There are a few in that category.
    Bring back Red Ed I say. The Tories are already implementing his policies anyway.
    Plus, I am fascinated to see what real "chaos" looks like.
    As entertaining as the last few years have been, at least we avoided the chaos of Ed Miliband.
  • Options
    CatMan said:

    CatMan said:

    Trying to predict what will happen if there is an election is pointless IMHO. Maybe the Brexit Party votes will mostly go Tory and Johnson will win a massive majority and start his glorious 20 year rule. Or maybe loads of Lib Dem votes will go to Labour and Corbyn wins a majority. Or maybe aliens from the planet Zargog will invade and turn us all into cyborgs.

    Trying to predict what will happen in an election is literally the point of this site!
    Well yes, I guess! :D

    Here's my prediction (if it's before 31s Oct): Tories win an overall majority (but not too big), Labour lose a few seats, Lib Dems win a few.

    There!
    "Down with that sort of thing" as Father Ted once said.....
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    Another mass shooting event Stateside
  • Options

    No downside? What is he going to do when the sheep are burning in the fields and petrol is running dry?

    1) any election will be before then, and anyway...
    2) thus wont happen.

    I look forward to continuing this exchange in the weeks after 31st Oct....
    For an election to happen before October 31st it needs to be called before parliament is prorogued. If parliament is prorogued without having forced Boris to extend or given him an election, he'll be stuffed.
    No he wont. He is now indelibly associated with leave by voters.

    If we remain he wins. If we leave he wins.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,970

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    Which is moot. So too are many inner city highly Remain places like inner London and Liverpool.

    What matters are the swing seats. Is Boris targeting swing voters in swing seats?
    Swing voters and swing seats are changing their meaning. It no longer means what it used to mean.
  • Options
    eek said:

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    My experience is that this "hatred" ( a bad and unpleasant word in politics, dont you think) has been somewhat lessened in recent years by a countervailing "hatred" of the new London metropolitan Labour Party as exemplified by Corbyn?

    Just a thought...
    Nope - Corbyn is liked around here as you could witness at this years (and previous years) Durham Miner's Gala.
    Sorry to be a pedant but thats in the NE.....
  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    eek said:

    I think Boris will do well in an election but I’m not convinced the vote will be efficient. They will pile up new votes in Labour seats with huge majorities but not win them.

    What reason do you give for that?

    The safest Labour seats by and large, along with the safest SNP seats are the seats where Remain piled up large majorities.

    Swing seats tended to be won by Leave.

    What you are effectively saying is they will pile up votes in Remain seats. Seems unlikely.
    60% of Labour constituencies voted leave.
    Yes and those 60% largely include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    The 40% largely won't include the target seats Boris will be hoping to win.

    If Boris can win the target seats within the 60% I don't think he'll care too much if he also wins votes in other ones he wasn't targetting. What matters is the target seats.
    What I’m saying is that the people Boris is now appealing to, for example the Northern Working Class, live in relatively safe Labour seats. Boris can pile up new Tory votes in these places and still not win any of them.

    My seat is a prime example. 57% Leave. MP is a ‘diehard Remainer’.

    Labour will easily retain it.
    Do you have any evidence for that?

    Your seat may be an example, but there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and similary] swing seats too. Winning votes in your seat doesn't preclude winning votes in swing seats.

    In fact as has been regularly posted here before the bulk of swing seats fit within a simple type: suburban towns.

    Inner cities tend to be Labour, the rural areas tend to be Tory. It is suburban towns that tend to decide who wins elections and there are plenty of Northern Working Class [and comparable] swing voters in suburban towns.

    There are a lot of swing seats across the North West and Midlands.
    This is Labour country. Hatred of the Tories runs deep. Brexit does not change that.
    My experience is that this "hatred" ( a bad and unpleasant word in politics, dont you think) has been somewhat lessened in recent years by a countervailing "hatred" of the new London metropolitan Labour Party as exemplified by Corbyn?

    Just a thought...
    Nope - Corbyn is liked around here as you could witness at this years (and previous years) Durham Miner's Gala.
    That explains his high favourability ratings I guess


    Oh wait
This discussion has been closed.