“A” customs union is crap we have to allow tariff free access to other countries but it’s not reciprocated. The only customs union worth being in is “the” customs union but the EU will not allow that as it threatens the integrity of the single market
And ultimately covered in shit and flushed down the drain.
I must admit I hadn't realised until today that Andrex is so called because it was invented by Andrea Leadsom during her time at ICI (though it was unaccountably omitted from her Nobel Prize citation).
You know that's going to become an urban myth now don't you?
Once it's on Wikipedia its fact!
I found out only recently how simple it is to become a Wikipedia editor (to expand and correct the entry for our village).
I shall resist the temptation to add the Andrex story to Leadsom's entry for fear of finding out how easy it is to be banned as a Wiki editor.
Any news on their signature colour? Pink is available.
Personally, I don't like it. First of all there are organisations like change.org, which might not align perfectly with the party's views. Secondly, change is not necessarily for the better ...
More importantly everyone's going to call them centrist CUKs
TIG to apply to be listed as a political party so they should be a permanent feature of polls soon
Tried to oust a Democratically elected leader of Labour
Trying to overturn a democratic referendum
Refuse to call by elections to ratify their switch of party
What a refreshing change! The Anti Democratic League for the bored middle class
What’s the problem in trying to oust a democratically elected leader? If a leader were awful should people have to sit and wait for them to quit of their own accord?
Well their reasoning for trying to oust him was that he was going to be awful, then he got their best election result in years. So their judgement is as poor as their principles
Perhaps so, but the point that a democratically elected leader does not and should not make someone immune to an ousting remains fair.
As part of a series it is meaningful
Umunna never has the guts to stand for anything independently (leadership bottle/by election) and has a habit of trying to overturn votes he disagrees with (Corbyn/Brexit), or run off. Not the kind of change the country is crying out for I'd say
No less shit than historic names Conservatives or Labour. At least it says what they want.
To change the UK by keeping things the same?
Well they don't want to do that, do they? They want to change the UK by pushing the assortment of extremists, thickos, bigots, xenophobes, quarterwits and clowns who have taken over the main two parties back into the wilderness.
More power to their elbows.
So their vision of the UK is one that looks exactly like the UK right now except that watching PMQs won't make their delicate centrist souls sad any more?
If you think that's how the UK looks now I have a bridge to sell you. Populism is on the rise.
Any news on their signature colour? Pink is available.
Personally, I don't like it. First of all there are organisations like change.org, which might not align perfectly with the party's views. Secondly, change is not necessarily for the better ...
More importantly everyone's going to call them centrist CUKs
More people have signed the petition than voted for all the other parties (non-CON or LAB) during the 2017 GE.
More people have signed the petition than voted for UKIP at its peak in the 2015 GE.
And over one eighth of the Total UK Electorate have now signed the 'Revoke' petition.
Um no. That assumes that all those who signed are part of the UK electorate. How many of the 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK have signed?
A lot of those 3.5mn will be joining the UK electorate in the next few years, incidentally. I think it's safe to assume they will not provide fertile ground for the Conservative party.
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
The shambolic and one-side way in which her party tried to manage Brexit. I dare say if they'd embraced your own model for leaving, she would still be in the Tory party today Richard.
More people have signed the petition than voted for all the other parties (non-CON or LAB) during the 2017 GE.
More people have signed the petition than voted for UKIP at its peak in the 2015 GE.
And over one eighth of the Total UK Electorate have now signed the 'Revoke' petition.
Um no. That assumes that all those who signed are part of the UK electorate. How many of the 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK have signed?
A lot of those 3.5mn will be joining the UK electorate in the next few years, incidentally. I think it's safe to assume they will not provide fertile ground for the Conservative party.
Any news on their signature colour? Pink is available.
Personally, I don't like it. First of all there are organisations like change.org, which might not align perfectly with the party's views. Secondly, change is not necessarily for the better ...
More importantly everyone's going to call them centrist CUKs
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
The shambolic and one-side way in which her party tried to manage Brexit. I dare say if they'd embraced your own model for leaving, she would still be in the Tory party today Richard.
She could have voted for the Deal rather than opposing it from the start in spite of what she claimed to her constituents. But then like most politicians she is far too dishonest to do that. The only principle she believes in is staying in her seat.
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
The shambolic and one-side way in which her party tried to manage Brexit. I dare say if they'd embraced your own model for leaving, she would still be in the Tory party today Richard.
She could have voted for the Deal rather than opposing it from the start in spite of what she claimed to her constituents. But then like most politicians she is far too dishonest to do that. The only principle she believes in is staying in her seat.
She is Dee C Lee to Chuka's Paul Weller in the CUKs Style Council of Equality
Yes, the only realistic path to avoid a GE is that a cross party coalition with a new PM is formed and holds together for long enough to pilot through a new softer brexit deal and/or a second referendum.
I see that as unlikely. A 2019 GE has now (finally!) gone to better than evens chance in the betting, and even where it is now (1.85) it is IMO more of a back than a lay.
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
I don't think she lied to constituents at all that I am aware of. Unless you hold to the rather ridiculous arcane idea that MPs have to stand on a manifesto dictated by some teenaged scribbler from No10, or conjured by the 2 brain celled bonce of Mr Thicky, and that they should all agree to it without deviation when elected, like so many automatons from a rubber stamping chamber in North Korea.
It is similarly ridiculous to say that just because someone disagrees with your world view they are unprincipled. I happen to think Jacob Rees-Mogg is a complete plonker, but I would never say he is unprincipled. Boris Johnson is, of course, a completely different kettle of bullshit.
More people have signed the petition than voted for all the other parties (non-CON or LAB) during the 2017 GE.
More people have signed the petition than voted for UKIP at its peak in the 2015 GE.
And over one eighth of the Total UK Electorate have now signed the 'Revoke' petition.
Um no. That assumes that all those who signed are part of the UK electorate. How many of the 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK have signed?
A lot of those 3.5mn will be joining the UK electorate in the next few years, incidentally. I think it's safe to assume they will not provide fertile ground for the Conservative party.
Until they actually have to I doubt many will have taken UK citizenship so my point stands.
I would also dispute that they may not vote Tory (though I have no interest in whether they do or not). Until such times as Corbyn buggers off and is replaced by someone sane I suspect the most likely course of action for many of them will be to abstain or to vote on the issues at the time which by then hopefully will not include Brexit.
For the record I speak as someone who will certainly not vote Tory as long as May is in charge. My vote is up for grabs if anyone wants it.
Corbyn sounds like he's choking on his cornflakes any time anything about another vote comes out. 5 whole seconds in his speech about any sort of ref then straight to a GE !
Anyone asked these nutjobs whether they want MPs to vote for the deal or not? Seeing as the latter leads away from Brexit.
I suspect just about every one of them will be wanting us to Leave without a Deal today - and declare war on the EU a few minutes later. Anything less would be unpatriotic.
Yes, the only realistic path to avoid a GE is that a cross party coalition with a new PM is formed and holds together for long enough to pilot through a new softer brexit deal and/or a second referendum.
I see that as unlikely. A 2019 GE has now (finally!) gone to better than evens chance in the betting, and even where it is now (1.85) it is IMO more of a back than a lay.
All roads lead to Prime minister Kenneth Clarke (if I say it enough it might come true!)
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
I don't think she lied to constituents at all that I am aware of. Unless you hold to the rather ridiculous arcane idea that MPs have to stand on a manifesto dictated by some teenaged scribbler from No10, or conjured by the 2 brain celled bonce of Mr Thicky, and that they should all agree to it without deviation when elected, like so many automatons from a rubber stamping chamber in North Korea.
It is similarly ridiculous to say that just because someone disagrees with your world view they are unprincipled. I happen to think Jacob Rees-Mogg is a complete plonker, but I would never say he is unprincipled. Boris Johnson is, of course, a completely different kettle of bullshit.
She is also representing the views of her constituents, as shown in the referendum that matter so much to Richard.
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
I don't think she lied to constituents at all that I am aware of. Unless you hold to the rather ridiculous arcane idea that MPs have to stand on a manifesto dictated by some teenaged scribbler from No10, or conjured by the 2 brain celled bonce of Mr Thicky, and that they should all agree to it without deviation when elected, like so many automatons from a rubber stamping chamber in North Korea.
It is similarly ridiculous to say that just because someone disagrees with your world view they are unprincipled. I happen to think Jacob Rees-Mogg is a complete plonker, but I would never say he is unprincipled. Boris Johnson is, of course, a completely different kettle of bullshit.
She put out personal statements in her own leaftlets and on twitter and other media that she stood by the result of the referendum.
Direct quotes:
“We must respect the democratic outcome of the referendum and work positively together to ensure we make Brexit a success.”
“I was a remainer, but the EU ref result is final and cannot be rerun.”
Yes, the only realistic path to avoid a GE is that a cross party coalition with a new PM is formed and holds together for long enough to pilot through a new softer brexit deal and/or a second referendum.
I see that as unlikely. A 2019 GE has now (finally!) gone to better than evens chance in the betting, and even where it is now (1.85) it is IMO more of a back than a lay.
All roads lead to Prime minister Kenneth Clarke (if I say it enough it might come true!)
I'm thinking Hague myself. Have a nibble on that too.
A mate has £2 on Chukka. I may join him, just in case. He would gloat for months if it came off and I wasn't party to it.
Yes, the only realistic path to avoid a GE is that a cross party coalition with a new PM is formed and holds together for long enough to pilot through a new softer brexit deal and/or a second referendum.
I see that as unlikely. A 2019 GE has now (finally!) gone to better than evens chance in the betting, and even where it is now (1.85) it is IMO more of a back than a lay.
But with Corbyn leading Labour we might well end up with another hung parliament and no resolution of anything.
Corbyn sounds like he's choking on his cornflakes any time anything about another vote comes out. 5 whole seconds in his speech about any sort of ref then straight to a GE !
Wait till he has to renew Trident next parliament. They'll never get him to sign the paperwork.
More people have signed the petition than voted for all the other parties (non-CON or LAB) during the 2017 GE.
More people have signed the petition than voted for UKIP at its peak in the 2015 GE.
And over one eighth of the Total UK Electorate have now signed the 'Revoke' petition.
Um no. That assumes that all those who signed are part of the UK electorate. How many of the 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK have signed?
A lot of those 3.5mn will be joining the UK electorate in the next few years, incidentally. I think it's safe to assume they will not provide fertile ground for the Conservative party.
Until they actually have to I doubt many will have taken UK citizenship so my point stands.
You doubt... I think that many already have or are actively in the process of applying for UK citizenship.
More people have signed the petition than voted for all the other parties (non-CON or LAB) during the 2017 GE.
More people have signed the petition than voted for UKIP at its peak in the 2015 GE.
And over one eighth of the Total UK Electorate have now signed the 'Revoke' petition.
Um no. That assumes that all those who signed are part of the UK electorate. How many of the 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK have signed?
A lot of those 3.5mn will be joining the UK electorate in the next few years, incidentally. I think it's safe to assume they will not provide fertile ground for the Conservative party.
Until they actually have to I doubt many will have taken UK citizenship so my point stands.
You doubt... I think that many already have or are actively in the process of applying for UK citizenship.
Yor opinion against mine.
Yep I wasn't saying you were wrong. But out of perhaps 40 or 50 EU citizens I know either as friends or work colleagues not a single one has chosen to take UK citizenship since the referendum. In contrast I am standing as a reference for a Vietnamese friend and his wife who have applied for UK citizenship and hope to hear by May.
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
I don't think she lied to constituents at all that I am aware of. Unless you hold to the rather ridiculous arcane idea that MPs have to stand on a manifesto dictated by some teenaged scribbler from No10, or conjured by the 2 brain celled bonce of Mr Thicky, and that they should all agree to it without deviation when elected, like so many automatons from a rubber stamping chamber in North Korea.
It is similarly ridiculous to say that just because someone disagrees with your world view they are unprincipled. I happen to think Jacob Rees-Mogg is a complete plonker, but I would never say he is unprincipled. Boris Johnson is, of course, a completely different kettle of bullshit.
She put out personal statements in her own leaftlets and on twitter and other media that she stood by the result of the referendum.
Direct quotes:
“We must respect the democratic outcome of the referendum and work positively together to ensure we make Brexit a success.”
“I was a remainer, but the EU ref result is final and cannot be rerun.”
She lied to her constituents to get elected.
Since her constituency - in which I live - was strongly remain, you could argue that those statements cost her votes.
Besides, when the situation changes (and it sure as heck has changed), reasonable people can change their minds. We're nearly three years on from the referendum, and it's all a bit of a mess, isn't it?
Well, for the first time ever, I have a party leader for an MP!
Heidi is a great choice for party leader – media savvy, telegenic, friendly. Normal.
Shame she’s also vacuous and unprincipled.
She is indeed principled – hence why she quit the unprincipled assortment of fuckwits that is the modern day Tory party.
So what principle led her to lie to her own constituents repeatedly during the 2017 election campaign?
I don't think she lied to constituents at all that I am aware of. Unless you hold to the rather ridiculous arcane idea that MPs have to stand on a manifesto dictated by some teenaged scribbler from No10, or conjured by the 2 brain celled bonce of Mr Thicky, and that they should all agree to it without deviation when elected, like so many automatons from a rubber stamping chamber in North Korea.
It is similarly ridiculous to say that just because someone disagrees with your world view they are unprincipled. I happen to think Jacob Rees-Mogg is a complete plonker, but I would never say he is unprincipled. Boris Johnson is, of course, a completely different kettle of bullshit.
She is also representing the views of her constituents, as shown in the referendum that matter so much to Richard.
So why did she go out of her way to say she would abide by the referendum result? If she were so sure that she would be able to get re-elected without lying, why did she lie?
Since her constituency - in which I live - was strongly remain, you could argue that those statements cost her votes.
Besides, when the situation changes (and it sure as heck has changed), reasonable people can change their minds. We're nearly three years on from the referendum, and it's all a bit of a mess, isn't it?
You have my pity. Being represented by a liar like that cannot be something any reasonable person would be proud of.
Richard, I don't think you are familiar with the area she represents. It is one of the strongest remain areas in the country. With respect to those quotes, they are not necessarily lies. I think the benefit of the doubt and some respect is due to those that change their mind when the facts become clearer, and they become clearer by the day that Brexit is a fiasco. I am sure you know the quote from John Maynard Keynes.
More people have signed the petition than voted for all the other parties (non-CON or LAB) during the 2017 GE.
More people have signed the petition than voted for UKIP at its peak in the 2015 GE.
And over one eighth of the Total UK Electorate have now signed the 'Revoke' petition.
Um no. That assumes that all those who signed are part of the UK electorate. How many of the 3.5 million EU citizens living in the UK have signed?
A lot of those 3.5mn will be joining the UK electorate in the next few years, incidentally. I think it's safe to assume they will not provide fertile ground for the Conservative party.
Until they actually have to I doubt many will have taken UK citizenship so my point stands.
I would also dispute that they may not vote Tory (though I have no interest in whether they do or not). Until such times as Corbyn buggers off and is replaced by someone sane I suspect the most likely course of action for many of them will be to abstain or to vote on the issues at the time which by then hopefully will not include Brexit.
For the record I speak as someone who will certainly not vote Tory as long as May is in charge. My vote is up for grabs if anyone wants it.
Some of them have already started the process, based on my own circle. Of course my circle is probably heavily biased towards the hideous Liberal Metropolitan Elite but my impression is they're not queueing up to thank the Tories for throwing their lives into confusion and creating a toxic nationalistic atmosphere. They will also help tilt the inevitable rejoin the EU referendum in the direction of yes in a few years, and perhaps even a revocation referendum if they can get the paperwork through in time.
Since her constituency - in which I live - was strongly remain, you could argue that those statements cost her votes.
Besides, when the situation changes (and it sure as heck has changed), reasonable people can change their minds. We're nearly three years on from the referendum, and it's all a bit of a mess, isn't it?
You have my pity. Being represented by a liar like that cannot be something any reasonable person would be proud of.
I don't need your pity, thanks. I actually quite like what she's done. You're traditionally someone who's against the party system and whipping in particular; I think what she's done is perfectly in line with that.
She's representing the views of her constituents; at least as far as we can tell.
Since her constituency - in which I live - was strongly remain, you could argue that those statements cost her votes.
Besides, when the situation changes (and it sure as heck has changed), reasonable people can change their minds. We're nearly three years on from the referendum, and it's all a bit of a mess, isn't it?
You have my pity. Being represented by a liar like that cannot be something any reasonable person would be proud of.
As I have met her on a number of occasions Richard, I have to tell you, you are talking bollox. She strikes me as a highly principled person. You don't agree with her world view, fine, but she is no more a liar than anyone else. Boris Johnson or Nigel Farage she ain't
I'm on the "Noe" side of the bet, but I think this is a very decent winding up speech by May actually.
For all the attacks she receives she is more knowledgeable, more competent, and grown up than so many ,including Corbyn, and may only be missed when she has resigned
I'm on the "Noe" side of the bet, but I think this is a very decent winding up speech by May actually.
For all the attacks she receives she is more knowledgeable, more competent, and grown up than so many ,including Corbyn, and may only be missed when she has resigned
Yep, for all her faults she's probably going to be a damned sight better than whichever wonder follows next. Hunt probably the best option for the country, though I do have some err... personal hopes for Steve Baker
Richard, I don't think you are familiar with the area she represents. It is one of the strongest remain areas in the country. With respect to those quotes, they are not necessarily lies. I think the benefit of the doubt and some respect is due to those that change their mind when the facts become clearer, and they become clearer by the day that Brexit is a fiasco. I am sure you know the quote from John Maynard Keynes.
I have little or no respect for MPs even at the best of times. But I certainly have no respect for MPs that lie openly to get themselves elected.
Can't help feeling with a bit of planning the Govt could have pulled it off today by splitting it into two stages, reaching out, trying to find consensus on the PD element, and by May not announcing she was going to quit if it passed. Properly planned, and signalled a week ago when the EU confirmed the extension arrangements, this might have worked.
Announcing she was quitting was what scuppered a potentially otherwise good way of breaking the impasse. In any event, had it passed, it would have been a moment of utter triumph for her not reason to quit.
She should be quitting in half an hour when yet another defeat on her deal is announced.
I'm on the "Noe" side of the bet, but I think this is a very decent winding up speech by May actually.
For all the attacks she receives she is more knowledgeable, more competent, and grown up than so many ,including Corbyn, and may only be missed when she has resigned
Yep, for all her faults she's probably going to be a damned sight better than whichever wonder follows next. Hunt probably the best option for the country, though I do have some err... personal hopes for Steve Baker
I think David Lidington as PM while they sort out the election of Steve Baker as party leader would be entirely appropriate.
Totally off topic....just hearing about south africas new interwebs content laws. They make article 13 look well thought out.
All content has to be sent for classification, and by all it includes YouTube videos, twitch streams and sharing any unclassified content via twitter /. Facebook etc those sharing it are also liable. So retweeting a YouTube video can get you locked up.
Sounds also a perfect way to censor anything the government doesn't like.
I'm on the "Noe" side of the bet, but I think this is a very decent winding up speech by May actually.
For all the attacks she receives she is more knowledgeable, more competent, and grown up than so many ,including Corbyn, and may only be missed when she has resigned
Yep, for all her faults she's probably going to be a damned sight better than whichever wonder follows next. Hunt probably the best option for the country, though I do have some err... personal hopes for Steve Baker
I think David Lidington as PM while they sort out the election of Steve Baker as party leader would be entirely appropriate.
I'm on the "Noe" side of the bet, but I think this is a very decent winding up speech by May actually.
For all the attacks she receives she is more knowledgeable, more competent, and grown up than so many ,including Corbyn, and may only be missed when she has resigned
She is lacking in the one thing that is essential for a leader, emotional intelligence. Blair had it, Cameron had it, Brown and May both lack it and is that defect that is the downfall for both.
Can't help feeling with a bit of planning the Govt could have pulled it off today by splitting it into two stages, reaching out, trying to find consensus on the PD element, and by May not announcing she was going to quit if it passed. Properly planned, and signalled a week ago when the EU confirmed the extension arrangements, this might have worked.
Announcing she was quitting was what scuppered a potentially otherwise good way of breaking the impasse. In any event, had it passed, it would have been a moment of utter triumph for her not reason to quit.
She should be quitting in half an hour when yet another defeat on her deal is announced.
Sigh,,,
That would be assuming the the ERG holdouts were open to reason. They're not and hopes of anything but a most godawful customs union style brexit are now dashed.
Comments
As I keep saying
I shall resist the temptation to add the Andrex story to Leadsom's entry for fear of finding out how easy it is to be banned as a Wiki editor.
They'll just be generally referred to as Change, I'd venture.
The bigger question is what signature colour will they choose? Stick with charcoal or grab the available pink?
I'd go with pink.
Umunna never has the guts to stand for anything independently (leadership bottle/by election) and has a habit of trying to overturn votes he disagrees with (Corbyn/Brexit), or run off. Not the kind of change the country is crying out for I'd say
If they won't, there can't be a GE until July at the earliest - two months even for an accelerated Con leadership contest + 5 weeks for GE campaign.
And in practice that probably means October - has there ever been a GE in July/Aug/Sept?
And all the immediate pressures are now - if a one year extension is agreed then the pressure will be off come June anyway.
An early GE must mean a May v Corbyn contest - anyone expecting an early GE should bet on Corbyn in next PM market.
It'd better be three months without pay and expenses too...
She hasn’t.
I see that as unlikely. A 2019 GE has now (finally!) gone to better than evens chance in the betting, and even where it is now (1.85) it is IMO more of a back than a lay.
It is similarly ridiculous to say that just because someone disagrees with your world view they are unprincipled. I happen to think Jacob Rees-Mogg is a complete plonker, but I would never say he is unprincipled. Boris Johnson is, of course, a completely different kettle of bullshit.
I would also dispute that they may not vote Tory (though I have no interest in whether they do or not). Until such times as Corbyn buggers off and is replaced by someone sane I suspect the most likely course of action for many of them will be to abstain or to vote on the issues at the time which by then hopefully will not include Brexit.
For the record I speak as someone who will certainly not vote Tory as long as May is in charge. My vote is up for grabs if anyone wants it.
Direct quotes:
“We must respect the democratic outcome of the referendum and work positively together to ensure we make Brexit a success.”
“I was a remainer, but the EU ref result is final and cannot be rerun.”
She lied to her constituents to get elected.
A mate has £2 on Chukka. I may join him, just in case. He would gloat for months if it came off and I wasn't party to it.
Yor opinion against mine.
https://twitter.com/starsports_bet/status/1111629849016369154?s=21
Besides, when the situation changes (and it sure as heck has changed), reasonable people can change their minds. We're nearly three years on from the referendum, and it's all a bit of a mess, isn't it?
https://twitter.com/jbickertonuk/status/1111612501995732993?s=21
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/mar/29/independent-group-to-register-as-change-uk-party-under-heidi-allen
She's representing the views of her constituents; at least as far as we can tell.
Hunt probably the best option for the country, though I do have some err... personal hopes for Steve Baker
Is she his carer?
Or perhaps he is just using her for the colour of her skin....
Quislings! Traitors! The worst betrayal for 200 years! Even worse than when Bob Dylan went electric!
Announcing she was quitting was what scuppered a potentially otherwise good way of breaking the impasse. In any event, had it passed, it would have been a moment of utter triumph for her not reason to quit.
She should be quitting in half an hour when yet another defeat on her deal is announced.
Sigh,,,
All content has to be sent for classification, and by all it includes YouTube videos, twitch streams and sharing any unclassified content via twitter /. Facebook etc those sharing it are also liable. So retweeting a YouTube video can get you locked up.
Sounds also a perfect way to censor anything the government doesn't like.
https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1111638074352680961
"Today we can show we can come together in the national internet..."
✔
@dansabbagh
Labour sources in the division lobbies saying they think they have won comfortably