Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » For Politicalbetting’s 15th anniversary today – a special cart

12346

Comments

  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    In times past you'd have been smashing up looms.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    No referendum option? "Abandon" implies straight revoke for most people I'd assume, and there will be plenty remainers very uncomfortable with that (at least without the figleaf-democratic justification of another vote).
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019
    So revoke Article 50 and abandon Brexit is the most popular option, but Leave with a Deal and Leave with No Deal combined has more support than revoke Article 50. Leave with a Deal is thus still the favoured option of the median voter
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    Thanks Mike, and well done us! #pb15
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    We meaning the Conservative party?
    I was meaning British governments generically whether Major with his community of nations, Blair with the CAP reform (hah!) or Cameron’s Bloomberg speech

    IMV all of those would have been improvements but there wasn’t the support for them in the EU
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117
    Well done Mike- who made this site from his study at Lonsdale Road in Oxford if I recall.

    I'm a latecomer- crashing on the site during the 2005 election. My highlight remains the 2006 Italian election- a Monday night when Prodi was interchanging with Berlusconi and the betfair markets were going bananas. PbCOM at it's best.

    Good to see the old guard still around too.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    IT is for me. And I am part of us as much as anyone else. Am getting increasingly tired of being told, from the PM downwards, what we, and therefore, by extension I think.
    If there's one thing we have learned from Brexit, it is that there is no us.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019
    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
  • nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    Andrew said:

    No referendum option? "Abandon" implies straight revoke for most people I'd assume, and there will be plenty remainers very uncomfortable with that (at least without the figleaf-democratic justification of another vote).
    I think abandon could mean a bit of both . They should have been clearer .
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    edited March 2019
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    In times past you'd have been smashing up looms.
    No, I wouldn’t.

    But I wouldn’t have been investing in cartwainers after the invention of the motor car
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    dixiedean said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    IT is for me. And I am part of us as much as anyone else. Am getting increasingly tired of being told, from the PM downwards, what we, and therefore, by extension I think.
    If there's one thing we have learned from Brexit, it is that there is no us.
    The PM thinking it was wise to address a divided nation on TV with the strapline "I am on your side" remains the most breathtaking misjudgement.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Happy Birthday! The one thing that led me to register and comment on this site for the first time this year, after 5 or 6 years of lurking, was my blood boiling at the use of the word “subjugation” and “vassalage” in the context of Brexit. England (the Celts get a pass on this one) is a very lucky country that has not suffered subjugation for nearly a millennium. To actually be subjugated, to experience the horror of it, makes the use of that word to describe a legally binding customs arrangement, which one wouldn’t know much about unless one were interested in such matters, and that certainly would have little impact on day to day life, border on the obscene. Only we English could be so historically tin-eared as use it in this context when our neighbours have suffered the real thing in living memory - inflicted by ourselves in at least one case. As for vassalage - I’m not entirely sure that people using it in this context know what that feudal term actually means.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    IanB2 said:

    dixiedean said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    IT is for me. And I am part of us as much as anyone else. Am getting increasingly tired of being told, from the PM downwards, what we, and therefore, by extension I think.
    If there's one thing we have learned from Brexit, it is that there is no us.
    The PM thinking it was wise to address a divided nation on TV with the strapline "I am on your side" remains the most breathtaking misjudgement.
    May has never missed an opportunity to shit on the the young, the metropolitans, the immigrants, and the makers.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    dixiedean said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    IT is for me. And I am part of us as much as anyone else. Am getting increasingly tired of being told, from the PM downwards, what we, and therefore, by extension I think.
    If there's one thing we have learned from Brexit, it is that there is no us.
    Thing is there is a profound disagreement in this country on the way forward

    In past times we might of got pointy sticks and selected some fields up and down the country to thrash out our differences

    But there’s this wonderful thing called democracy. We asked everyone their opinion, added up the totals and went down the path that more people preferred

    Isn’t that a wonderful system?
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    Don’t forget to subtract 4 for Andrew’s experiments
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,580
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Excepting the Casino theory that these photos are all photoshopped, this march in London is going to be big.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914
    Charles said:

    eristdoof said:

    Charles said:

    notme2 said:

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Well get your MP to vote for the WA.
    No thanks mate. Revoke all the way. Only way to end this thing.
    The one thing that revoke is guaranteed not to do is “end this thing”!
    Nothing is "going to end this thing" what ever happens. The country is split and passions are strong.
    Nah after we leave we’ll have 3 months of anguished “what have we done” articles, 6 months of doom spotting and then we’ll move onto other things

    The FTA will attract much less attention.

    The autumn GE is going to be fun though :)
    Tories out for 12 years minimum - all due to Brexit.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    edited March 2019
    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    In times past you'd have been smashing up looms.
    No, I wouldn’t.

    But I wouldn’t have been investing in cartwainers after the invention of the motor car
    Well, as a gentlemens' disagreement, I think that you would. It's all about hankering for an irretrievable past.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Charles said:

    dixiedean said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    IT is for me. And I am part of us as much as anyone else. Am getting increasingly tired of being told, from the PM downwards, what we, and therefore, by extension I think.
    If there's one thing we have learned from Brexit, it is that there is no us.
    Thing is there is a profound disagreement in this country on the way forward

    In past times we might of got pointy sticks and selected some fields up and down the country to thrash out our differences

    But there’s this wonderful thing called democracy. We asked everyone their opinion, added up the totals and went down the path that more people preferred

    Isn’t that a wonderful system?
    For sure. It's great that we spent nearly three years following that path. Then reached the dead end that forces us to rethink.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    Charles said:

    dixiedean said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    IT is for me. And I am part of us as much as anyone else. Am getting increasingly tired of being told, from the PM downwards, what we, and therefore, by extension I think.
    If there's one thing we have learned from Brexit, it is that there is no us.
    Thing is there is a profound disagreement in this country on the way forward

    In past times we might of got pointy sticks and selected some fields up and down the country to thrash out our differences

    But there’s this wonderful thing called democracy. We asked everyone their opinion, added up the totals and went down the path that more people preferred

    Isn’t that a wonderful system?
    IT is indeed. Which is why I dissent.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,136

    viewcode said:

    AndyJS said:

    I'm considering whether to join this party:

    https://sdp.org.uk/new-declaration/

    Rod Liddle has just joined it, I believe. So if you want to be in the same party as Rod Liddle, there is...that.
    So has Giles Fraser I think. If that's not an inducement...
    I kind of despair. We have people who are the epitome of metropolitan elites bemoaning other metropolitan elites as if they were working-class. The Spectator is a very well-funded support group for twats. It attracts people who earn way too much money writing polemics, have no observable job, and have repellent personal habits that nobody has ever slapped them out of. I just can't help but think "Look, get a proper job, see if you can hold it down for more than five minutes, and fix your fucking teeth while you're at it. God knows you can afford it."
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,414
    Charles said:

    eek said:

    Charles said:

    notme2 said:

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Well get your MP to vote for the WA.
    No thanks mate. Revoke all the way. Only way to end this thing.
    The one thing that revoke is guaranteed not to do is “end this thing”!
    And May’s deal with all negotiations to follow ends things?
    It’s a step on the path.

    9-12 months after we leave people will be talking about something else
    Yep. Rejoining.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,387
    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    Floater said:
    But only 24% support no deal. So there’s no mandate for a no deal . And the ERG telling everyone Leavers voted for no deal in 2016 is just another lie being peddled by them.

    The ERG stance is making things worse and is driving Remainers who were willing to accept and move on into the either just revoke or another EU vote .
    Indeed. Take out the DKs, and Revoke is already in the low 40s. Given that a fair chunk of those wanting a new deal and later exit will be supporting a soft Brexit, that's where the consensus is right now.
    I think you're getting high on your own supply. Revoke is certainly not the consensus among the public.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    Defeat of ISIS claimed as their last territory falls to the Syrian Democratic Forces

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-47678157#
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,951
    IanB2 said:

    Excepting the Casino theory that these photos are all photoshopped, this march in London is going to be big.

    Good luck to all attending. I would rather we leave with a deal, but the right to protest is something we should cherish in a free society.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    Floater said:
    This is not news. Among the public, as in parliament, there are a large number of remainers who feel it's important to respect the result of the referendum. This does not mean they'd vote Leave if we had a second referendum.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,042
    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,628

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    That's a lot of steam.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Sean_F said:

    IanB2 said:

    nico67 said:

    Floater said:
    But only 24% support no deal. So there’s no mandate for a no deal . And the ERG telling everyone Leavers voted for no deal in 2016 is just another lie being peddled by them.

    The ERG stance is making things worse and is driving Remainers who were willing to accept and move on into the either just revoke or another EU vote .
    Indeed. Take out the DKs, and Revoke is already in the low 40s. Given that a fair chunk of those wanting a new deal and later exit will be supporting a soft Brexit, that's where the consensus is right now.
    I think you're getting high on your own supply. Revoke is certainly not the consensus among the public.
    You misunderstood. Very soft Brexit is the current consensus. Although every action by the Brexit ultras pushes it towards calling the whole thing off.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,008

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    And the steam from Leavers' boiling piss is inexhaustible, so a clear win for them.
  • tottenhamWCtottenhamWC Posts: 352

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    edited March 2019

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    And the steam from Leavers' boiling piss is inexhaustible, so a clear win for them.
    i bow to your superior knowledge on that

    i prefer Evian
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,042
    edited March 2019

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,042
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited March 2019

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    I thought the same with Mrs JackW's solo efforts to revive the British shoe industry .... not quite 5-6 million pairs but at times it appears too close to call !! .... :astonished:
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    AndyJS said:

    I'm considering whether to join this party:

    https://sdp.org.uk/new-declaration/

    It's not 1982. Joining the SDP in 2019 is throwing yourself into the political wilderness where the rest of us can ignore you.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,387

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's an impressive number, but 16m voted Remain, and clicking a website requires little effort.
  • tottenhamWCtottenhamWC Posts: 352

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Funnily enough that would also have the benefit of killing Corbyn with referendum / remain backers
    ....
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    Here twitchers are going crazy over a rare UK sighting of a Great Spotted Cuckoo
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,136

    Far too many old friends on PB to attempt to list them here, as one is sure to forget a good few, but also a time to remember those who have sadly passed on over the past 15 years.
    For me at least, PB.com's Halcyon years were between 2004 - 2010 when the site was good to its name in terms of the betting side of politics, featuring as it then did several brilliant tipsters, a feature which more recently has been all but lost.

    Mark Senior died. Plato (Phillipa IRL) also died. We've had quite a few deaths and long-term illnesses amongst contributors recently, and one of our happy band had his wife die. No matter how good the party is, everybody goes home in the end.
  • kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Meanwhile 17.4 million people who quietly voted leave who go and and work and don’t go marching and shouting quietly wait for their democratic vote to be honoured. Who were told the vote would be implemented
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,008

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    And the steam from Leavers' boiling piss is inexhaustible, so a clear win for them.
    i bow to your superior knowledge on that

    i prefer Evian
    You piss Evian? I'm assuming it's still pretty steamy when it escapes.
  • tottenhamWCtottenhamWC Posts: 352
    kjohnw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Meanwhile 17.4 million people who quietly voted leave who go and and work and don’t go marching and shouting quietly wait for their democratic vote to be honoured. Who were told the vote would be implemented
    Yes - and who knows in what form? I think no deal was certainly not advertised as the outcome though so a bit of reflection on that would work wonders and the naysayers might back her deal... or run the risk of remaining
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,387

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    I hear owls, but never see them.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,914

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Call me old fashioned but perhaps the government should honour the biggest vote ever, before they start worrying about the biggest petition, and the biggest march.
  • tottenhamWCtottenhamWC Posts: 352
    glw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Call me old fashioned but perhaps the government should honour the biggest vote ever, before they start worrying about the biggest petition, and the biggest march.
    But they can't - in large part because the ERG Brexiteers won't support it. What irony, hey :)
  • hamiltonacehamiltonace Posts: 660
    kjohnw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Meanwhile 17.4 million people who quietly voted leave who go and and work and don’t go marching and shouting quietly wait for their democratic vote to be honoured. Who were told the vote would be implemented
    Shows how stupid May was to try and drive through a marginal decision with such large implications and an entrenched opposition.
  • BigIanBigIan Posts: 198

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    Is there a graph anywhere of volume over time?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    IanB2 said:

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    Here twitchers are going crazy over a rare UK sighting of a Great Spotted Cuckoo
    Here PB twitchers are going crazy over a rare UK sighting of the Great Tit Stuart Dickson ....
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    kjohnw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Meanwhile 17.4 million people who quietly voted leave who go and and work and don’t go marching and shouting quietly wait for their democratic vote to be honoured. Who were told the vote would be implemented
    As a point of order, many Leavers don’t work.

    Remain had a clear majority among those in work.


    Ashcroft: A majority of those working full-time or part-time voted to remain in the EU; most of those not working voted to leave. More than half of those retired on a private pension voted to leave, as did two thirds of those retired on a state pension.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    glw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Call me old fashioned but perhaps the government should honour the biggest vote ever, before they start worrying about the biggest petition, and the biggest march.
    As with Blair, it wont influence the decision, but it may well shape the legacy.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    BigIan said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    Is there a graph anywhere of volume over time?
    Launched in February. Slowly rose to 60,000 sigs before the moment that our PriMino decided it was a good idea to go live on TV. Since when it has spiralled inexorably upwards.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    edited March 2019
    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
    But then you have to think in an actual referendum the remain campaign would be worth at least another 4% for leave...

    I mean given these are people who think it's actually a good idea to gloat about the number of grannies that have died since 2016...

    Image the kind of campaign they'd run in a second go-round.

    I think it'd be very close again but certainly wouldn't rule out NO DEAL winning a People's Vote.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,951
    glw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Call me old fashioned but perhaps the government should honour the biggest vote ever, before they start worrying about the biggest petition, and the biggest march.
    If we crash out to no deal, how is that honouring the vote? It isn't honouring mine. I voted to leave, but on the presumption - which now looks somewhat foolish - that we would leave in an orderly fashion, in a way that maintained close ties with our neighbours while disentangling ourselves from the political project of the EU. I did not vote to leave so that a small minority of hardliners within Parliament could force us out on the worst possible terms and quite probably tank the economy while doing so, all to prove an ideological point.

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Sean_F said:

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    I hear owls, but never see them.
    We all heard of the owls and then Ed got a public BREXIT
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    HYUFD said:


    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/

    That would be hilarious, given the anger it would cause among many Tory MPs. I suppose the questions are whether enough Tories hate the idea that it would not pass even with many Labour MPs in support, and whether the Cabinet factions would blow up over the idea, because it really really seems like the sort of option that will cause X number to say they will resign and so she won't do it. The number of angry Tory MPs is almost a secondary consideration because in several votes a majority have been against her anyway, and everyone knows she will not be post much longer, so its about whether she can keep it together long enough to hold a vote.

    Charles said:

    eristdoof said:

    Charles said:

    notme2 said:

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Well get your MP to vote for the WA.
    No thanks mate. Revoke all the way. Only way to end this thing.
    The one thing that revoke is guaranteed not to do is “end this thing”!
    Nothing is "going to end this thing" what ever happens. The country is split and passions are strong.
    Nah after we leave we’ll have 3 months of anguished “what have we done” articles, 6 months of doom spotting and then we’ll move onto other things

    The FTA will attract much less attention.

    The autumn GE is going to be fun though :)
    Tories out for 12 years minimum - all due to Brexit.
    That doesn't sound that remarkable to me. Labour were out of power for 18 years, then Tories out for 13 years, and Tories (albeit not in a majority for most of it) have led the government for the last 9 years. It would seem pretty normal if, in the event of a GE, the Tories are out for around a decade.

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    edited March 2019

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Not if you want it to pass (I don't believe we'll even see if come forward). But Corbyn's version is probably more popular on the basis he could get a lot of Lab MPs to do it and some Tory MPs, whereas May's deal can get most Tory MPs and virtually no Lab MPs.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,628

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    No House Sparrows ?

    No Collared Doves, Pied Wagtails, Magpies, Gulls, Ducks ?

    Too early for House Martins etc.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:


    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/

    That would be hilarious, given the anger it would cause among many Tory MPs. I suppose the questions are whether enough Tories hate the idea that it would not pass even with many Labour MPs in support, and whether the Cabinet factions would blow up over the idea, because it really really seems like the sort of option that will cause X number to say they will resign and so she won't do it. The number of angry Tory MPs is almost a secondary consideration because in several votes a majority have been against her anyway, and everyone knows she will not be post much longer, so its about whether she can keep it together long enough to hold a vote.

    Charles said:

    eristdoof said:

    Charles said:

    notme2 said:

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Well get your MP to vote for the WA.
    No thanks mate. Revoke all the way. Only way to end this thing.
    The one thing that revoke is guaranteed not to do is “end this thing”!
    Nothing is "going to end this thing" what ever happens. The country is split and passions are strong.
    Nah after we leave we’ll have 3 months of anguished “what have we done” articles, 6 months of doom spotting and then we’ll move onto other things

    The FTA will attract much less attention.

    The autumn GE is going to be fun though :)
    Tories out for 12 years minimum - all due to Brexit.
    That doesn't sound that remarkable to me. Labour were out of power for 18 years, then Tories out for 13 years, and Tories (albeit not in a majority for most of it) have led the government for the last 9 years. It would seem pretty normal if, in the event of a GE, the Tories are out for around a decade.

    And how they would deserve it, for putting their obsessions ahead of the national interest. If only we had a credible alternative government in waiting.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019
    kjohnw said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    It's a statement of intent. Biggest petition ever and (maybe - we will see) the biggest march ever in UK too.

    Doubt it achieves anything specific but it puts a clear marker against no deal at a minimum and may encourage MPs to have the courage of their convictions to act accordingly - on all sides.
    Meanwhile 17.4 million people who quietly voted leave who go and and work and don’t go marching and shouting quietly wait for their democratic vote to be honoured. Who were told the vote would be implemented
    I thought some of those Leavers were marching from Sunderland to London? Farage even addressed 200 of them in Nottinghamshire this morning.

    On Friday there is the 'March to Leave' in London too

    https://m.evensi.uk/29th-march-parliament-square-leave/295655450
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    Leavers are suddenly on the back foot and need to tread carefully... eg. there's a blockade of Fishguard planned for tomorrow, which will feed into the narrative of Leave being disruptive (and Leavers being sore winners). If Leavers in parliament don't tell May quickly that they'll swallow their pride and back her, their Brexit dream may soon be over.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,914
    kyf_100 said:

    If we crash out to no deal, how is that honouring the vote? It isn't honouring mine. I voted to leave, but on the presumption - which now looks somewhat foolish - that we would leave in an orderly fashion, in a way that maintained close ties with our neighbours while disentangling ourselves from the political project of the EU. I did not vote to leave so that a small minority of hardliners within Parliament could force us out on the worst possible terms and quite probably tank the economy while doing so, all to prove an ideological point.

    Neither did I. I'm merely pointing out that people arguing for second referendums based upon the numbers signing a petition or marching ought first to consider the much larger number of people who actually voted.

    If you think 4 million "signatures" means something then surely 17 million votes is even more significant.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Pretty much, with Labour, SNP, LD and Tory Remainer votes it would probably get a majority too
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    "Trump on track for landslide win in 2020, according to multiple economic models that have consistently predicted presidential winners

    President's re-election could be propelled by strong economic figures and incumbent advantages"

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/trump-2020-win-polls-us-election-campaign-democrats-a8835186.html
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,042

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    No House Sparrows ?

    No Collared Doves, Pied Wagtails, Magpies, Gulls, Ducks ?

    Too early for House Martins etc.
    The lack of House Sparrows and Collared Doves is definitely a surprise. Plenty of gulls in the area but they don't drop in to the garden. There was a redwing in next door's garden back in January but it failed to come into ours.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,387
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but thatip.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over N

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Not if you want it to pass (I don't believe we'll even see if come forward). But Corbyn's version is probably more popular on the basis he could get a lot of Lab MPs to do it and some Tory MPs, whereas May's deal can get most Tory MPs and virtually no Lab MPs.
    If it does go to indicative voting, I guess it would be something like:-

    Revoke 120
    Second Referendum (but on what?) 150
    Leave without a Deal 120
    Norway 50
    May's Deal 150
    CU 50

    at stage 1.

    Revoke, May's Deal, and No Deal start high, but won't pick up many additional votes,

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Pretty much, with Labour, SNP, LD and Tory Remainer votes it would probably get a majority too
    It's a nice thought, but do you actually think it is actually being considered or is it just talk designed to try to scare ERG types?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
    But then you have to think in an actual referendum the remain campaign would be worth at least another 4% for leave...

    I mean given these are people who think it's actually a good idea to gloat about the number of grannies that have died since 2016...

    Image the kind of campaign they'd run in a second go-round.

    I think it'd be very close again but certainly wouldn't rule out NO DEAL winning a People's Vote.
    Perhaps, but it is all hypothetical anyway as the Commons would only ever allow a Remain v Deal 2nd referendum, it would never vote to allow No Deal on the ballot paper
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    edited March 2019
    Dadge said:

    Leavers are suddenly on the back foot and need to tread carefully... eg. there's a blockade of Fishguard planned for tomorrow, which will feed into the narrative of Leave being disruptive (and Leavers being sore winners). If Leavers in parliament don't tell May quickly that they'll swallow their pride and back her, their Brexit dream may soon be over.

    Given as far as we know Brexit has been cancelled (29th March is off and there's no other firm date for Leave) I would expect civil disobedience to grow incrementally through the week.

    I doubt there's anything any politician can do to stop it we just have to hope there's no violence.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:


    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/

    That would be hilarious, given the anger it would cause among many Tory MPs. I suppose the questions are whether enough Tories hate the idea that it would not pass even with many Labour MPs in support, and whether the Cabinet factions would blow up over the idea, because it really really seems like the sort of option that will cause X number to say they will resign and so she won't do it. The number of angry Tory MPs is almost a secondary consideration because in several votes a majority have been against her anyway, and everyone knows she will not be post much longer, so its about whether she can keep it together long enough to hold a vote.

    Charles said:

    eristdoof said:

    Charles said:

    notme2 said:

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Well get your MP to vote for the WA.
    No thanks mate. Revoke all the way. Only way to end this thing.
    The one thing that revoke is guaranteed not to do is “end this thing”!
    Nothing is "going to end this thing" what ever happens. The country is split and passions are strong.
    Nah after we leave we’ll have 3 months of anguished “what have we done” articles, 6 months of doom spotting and then we’ll move onto other things

    The FTA will attract much less attention.

    The autumn GE is going to be fun though :)
    Tories out for 12 years minimum - all due to Brexit.
    That doesn't sound that remarkable to me. Labour were out of power for 18 years, then Tories out for 13 years, and Tories (albeit not in a majority for most of it) have led the government for the last 9 years. It would seem pretty normal if, in the event of a GE, the Tories are out for around a decade.

    A majority of Tory MPs have already voted to keep No Deal on the table and against an extension of Article 50 but MPs as a whole voted to rule out No Deal and for extension. In a hung parliament May's Deal and permanent Customs Union would probably get through given May is proposing it would be part of a series of indicative votes including No Deal and revoke Article 50 rather than just a one off vote
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    Charles said:

    IanB2 said:

    After this mess is fixed, we need to reinvigorate the Conservative Party. It needs to be a party which is in tune with the the Conservative instincts of the backbone of this great Country, not runs scared of the liberal elites in the establishment.(who cocked up Brexit when they should have played hard ball). And, as is already the case, be a party that is is firmly rooted in the domestic agenda to improve people's lives.

    The problem is that Brexit isn't actually conservative. Despite what so many party members think.
    That’s a misunderstanding of what it means to be conservative.

    “Reform that ye may preserve” is the watchword
    Walking out is not reform.
    It is for this country

    We’ve tried to reform the EU but our partners want something different to us. Good luck to them and I hope it works out, but it’s not for us.
    In times past you'd have been smashing up looms.
    No, I wouldn’t.

    But I wouldn’t have been investing in cartwainers after the invention of the motor car
    Well, as a gentlemens' disagreement, I think that you would. It's all about hankering for an irretrievable past.
    I think I have a better idea than you about what I “hanker for”!
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,580

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    No House Sparrows ?

    No Collared Doves, Pied Wagtails, Magpies, Gulls, Ducks ?

    Too early for House Martins etc.
    Be thankful there are no magpies. If there were a fair few of the birds on Sandy's list would be absent. Having Magpies in your garden is almost as bad as having a cat.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    glw said:

    kyf_100 said:

    If we crash out to no deal, how is that honouring the vote? It isn't honouring mine. I voted to leave, but on the presumption - which now looks somewhat foolish - that we would leave in an orderly fashion, in a way that maintained close ties with our neighbours while disentangling ourselves from the political project of the EU. I did not vote to leave so that a small minority of hardliners within Parliament could force us out on the worst possible terms and quite probably tank the economy while doing so, all to prove an ideological point.

    Neither did I. I'm merely pointing out that people arguing for second referendums based upon the numbers signing a petition or marching ought first to consider the much larger number of people who actually voted.

    If you think 4 million "signatures" means something then surely 17 million votes is even more significant.
    There is a bit of a misconception that the petition is intended in some way to displace the referendum. Petitions are, and always have been, a request to Parliament to consider an issue. It’s only recently that information technology has allowed them to be presented in this manner. The petition is currently the only means by which people who really think that the country is headed down a disasterous road can put their case to the sole body that can make a difference. It’s not a pissing contest with the referendum. It couldn’t be. No one has promised to honour the petition - it is merely an address to Parliament to debate reconsidering acting on the referendum in the light of subsequent events. It will be rejected, but it will have made its poitnt, and may possibly act as leverage to a softer Brexit - as with the march today.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    Pies
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
    But then you have to think in an actual referendum the remain campaign would be worth at least another 4% for leave...

    I mean given these are people who think it's actually a good idea to gloat about the number of grannies that have died since 2016...

    Image the kind of campaign they'd run in a second go-round.

    I think it'd be very close again but certainly wouldn't rule out NO DEAL winning a People's Vote.
    No sensible politician will allow no deal onto a ballot paper. Direct democracy is all very well but there is no point in offering people idiotic solutions.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    JackW said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    I thought the same with Mrs JackW's solo efforts to revive the British shoe industry .... not quite 5-6 million pairs but at times it appears too close to call !! .... :astonished:
    She’s putting her heart and sole into it. Your job is to toe the line and unlace the purse strings. Don’t let your tongue flap or she’ll call you to heel as soon as you blow your horn
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,387
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesn't necessarily mean it is possible within the rules of the various organisations. A permanent Customs Union is, I believe, mutually exclusive with EFTA membership.
    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Pretty much, with Labour, SNP, LD and Tory Remainer votes it would probably get a majority too
    It's a nice thought, but do you actually think it is actually being considered or is it just talk designed to try to scare ERG types?
    Pretty sure it would not be supported by Lib Dems, SNP, TIG, Plaid, or Lucas. That's 62 votes. Many Labour Remainers would oppose it, along with Conservative hardliners.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    viewcode said:

    Far too many old friends on PB to attempt to list them here, as one is sure to forget a good few, but also a time to remember those who have sadly passed on over the past 15 years.
    For me at least, PB.com's Halcyon years were between 2004 - 2010 when the site was good to its name in terms of the betting side of politics, featuring as it then did several brilliant tipsters, a feature which more recently has been all but lost.

    Mark Senior died. Plato (Phillipa IRL) also died. We've had quite a few deaths and long-term illnesses amongst contributors recently, and one of our happy band had his wife die. No matter how good the party is, everybody goes home in the end.
    I hadn’t realised Plato had died. Sorry to hear that - when did it happen?
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited March 2019
    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
    That's why, if we have another referendum, the first round would have to be a repeat of the 23rd June 2016 vote, ie. just Remain or Leave. The second round would then have to determine what type of Remaining or Leaving it would be. Doing it the other way round would lead to a lot of disillusionment.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,628
    Sean_F said:

    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:


    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but thatip.

    Then we stay in the single market and Customs Union anyway and do not apply to join EFTA until a solution has finally been agreed on the Irish border
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over N

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Not if you want it to pass (I don't believe we'll even see if come forward). But Corbyn's version is probably more popular on the basis he could get a lot of Lab MPs to do it and some Tory MPs, whereas May's deal can get most Tory MPs and virtually no Lab MPs.
    If it does go to indicative voting, I guess it would be something like:-

    Revoke 120
    Second Referendum (but on what?) 150
    Leave without a Deal 120
    Norway 50
    May's Deal 150
    CU 50

    at stage 1.

    Revoke, May's Deal, and No Deal start high, but won't pick up many additional votes,

    I still find it incredible that a third of Conservative MPs are willing to 'twist on twenty' by supporting No Deal.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,183
    edited March 2019
    kle4 said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    I think the main problem with this us that EFTA membership and a Customs union with the EU are mutually exclusive. I am not sure but I think this is indeed another unicorn.
    Customs Union is required for the backstop, once solution agreed for NI no backstop needed.

    The Commons is likeliest to vote for permanent Customs Union above all though over No Deal, Deal, revoke, EUref2, even Norway Plus
    The Commons can vote for what they like - and I wish they would.- but that doesnbership.
    Then we stay in the der
    We cannot. Single Market membership is a function of membership of the EEA and you can only be in the EEA if you are in the EU or EFTA. This is just more unicorns.
    We probably can. It is the EU who have said we have to stay in the Customs Union to avoid a hard border in Ireland until an alternative solution is found, if we agree to free movement we could probably stay in the single market too and be a third element of the EEA.

    If not then we would just leave the full single market and EEA but stay in a permanent Customs Union which Juncker has confirmed is an option for us in terms of revisiting the backstop and the Commons would vote for permanent Customs Union over No Deal

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/26/juncker-may-backstop-eu-customs-union
    Indeed May is already said to be considering allowing a vote on her Deal with a permanent Customs Union attached to win over Labour MPs

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/03/22/theresa-may-gambles-customs-union-vote-boris-johnson-reminds/
    Wouldn't that be better referred to as Corbyn's Deal?
    Pretty much, with Labour, SNP, LD and Tory Remainer votes it would probably get a majority too
    It's a nice thought, but do you actually think it is actually being considered or is it just talk designed to try to scare ERG types?
    Absolutely it is being considered, May will apparently propose it as part of a series of indicative votes alongside her Deal as it is, revoke Article 50, EUref2, No Deal and single market and customs union. The aim being to force the Commons to come to a decision
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    IanB2 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
    But then you have to think in an actual referendum the remain campaign would be worth at least another 4% for leave...

    I mean given these are people who think it's actually a good idea to gloat about the number of grannies that have died since 2016...

    Image the kind of campaign they'd run in a second go-round.

    I think it'd be very close again but certainly wouldn't rule out NO DEAL winning a People's Vote.
    No sensible politician will allow no deal onto a ballot paper. Direct democracy is all very well but there is no point in offering people idiotic solutions.
    I believe "The Master" himself is on record as saying another referendum would have to have some form of Farage type"hard" Brexit on it (as well as other options) ? :D
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,042

    Off topic: Lesser Redpoll in the garden. 28th species to visit this year.

    What are the other 27 ?
    OK - here goes:

    Blackbird
    Great spotted woodpecker
    Coal tit
    Great tit
    Blue tit
    Dunnock
    Jackdaw
    Chaffinch
    Wood pigeon
    Robin
    Jay
    Nuthatch
    Magpie
    Carrion crow
    Tree sparrow
    Long tailed tit
    Starling
    Sparrowhawk
    Wren
    Bullfinch
    Goldfinch
    Pheasant
    Siskin
    Stock dove
    Tawny owl
    Greenfinch
    Song thrush
    No House Sparrows ?

    No Collared Doves, Pied Wagtails, Magpies, Gulls, Ducks ?

    Too early for House Martins etc.
    Be thankful there are no magpies. If there were a fair few of the birds on Sandy's list would be absent. Having Magpies in your garden is almost as bad as having a cat.
    Magpie is on the list.

    For completeness, we've also had a Tree Creeper, but that was last year.
  • DadgeDadge Posts: 2,052
    GIN1138 said:

    Dadge said:

    Leavers are suddenly on the back foot and need to tread carefully... eg. there's a blockade of Fishguard planned for tomorrow, which will feed into the narrative of Leave being disruptive (and Leavers being sore winners). If Leavers in parliament don't tell May quickly that they'll swallow their pride and back her, their Brexit dream may soon be over.

    Given as far as we know Brexit has been cancelled (29th March is off and there's no other firm date for Leave) I would expect civil disobedience to grow incrementally through the week.

    I doubt there's anything any politician can do to stop it we just have to hope there's no violence.
    This is the kind of ridiculous rhetorical statement that is giving Brexiters such a bad name. Brexit has not been cancelled. MPs, including Brexiters, have voted against the WA, but parliament has also voted against a 2nd referendum. There is still a significant majority in Parliament committed to seeing Brexit through. Brexiters would do well to work constructively with that, rather than destroying their own cause by attacking the institution that is trying to give them what they want.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Poor Farage, the former master of publicity, his pitiful march has simply exposed him to ridicule.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    BigIan said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,242,721. Officially the largest ever petition on the government website.

    I think it runs out of steam somewhere between 5 and 6 million
    Is there a graph anywhere of volume over time?
    Launched in February. Slowly rose to 60,000 sigs before the moment that our PriMino decided it was a good idea to go live on TV. Since when it has spiralled inexorably upwards.
    I though it was because a celeb (Lilly Allen?) retweeted a link - so it’s lots of fans rather than necessarily deep political thinkers
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    Charles said:

    viewcode said:

    Far too many old friends on PB to attempt to list them here, as one is sure to forget a good few, but also a time to remember those who have sadly passed on over the past 15 years.
    For me at least, PB.com's Halcyon years were between 2004 - 2010 when the site was good to its name in terms of the betting side of politics, featuring as it then did several brilliant tipsters, a feature which more recently has been all but lost.

    Mark Senior died. Plato (Phillipa IRL) also died. We've had quite a few deaths and long-term illnesses amongst contributors recently, and one of our happy band had his wife die. No matter how good the party is, everybody goes home in the end.
    I hadn’t realised Plato had died. Sorry to hear that - when did it happen?
    It was reported on here 2-3 months ago but I think she actually died back last Summer? :(
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251
    edited March 2019
    tyson said:

    Well done Mike- who made this site from his study at Lonsdale Road in Oxford if I recall.

    I'm a latecomer- crashing on the site during the 2005 election. My highlight remains the 2006 Italian election- a Monday night when Prodi was interchanging with Berlusconi and the betfair markets were going bananas. PbCOM at it's best.

    Good to see the old guard still around too.

    Mention of Berlusconi reminded me of one of Marf's finest

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2011/11/page/9/

    Congrats to PB on its 15th!
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    HYUFD said:


    Absolutely it is being considered, May will apparently propose it as part of a series of indicative votes alongside her Deal as it is, revoke Article 50, EUref2, No Deal and single market and single market and customs union. The aim being to force the Commons to come to a decision


    Makes sense. May will know she has weeks at most left now, and that's going to free her up a bit - some sort of crossparty deal maybe becomes more likely as a result.

    Of course, that presumes Corbyn won't just continue refusing everything, hoping for crash no-deal.
  • brendan16brendan16 Posts: 2,315
    edited March 2019
    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    GIN1138 said:

    The question is where would the people who want to leave with a deal (either May's deal or another deal) go if forced to choose between Remain/Revoke and No Deal...
    Many would go to No Deal but enough would switch to Remain for Remain to win.

    Yougov has it Remain 57% Leave with No Deal 43%

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/a4zdts/yougov_poll_remain_57_5_no_deal_43_5/
    But then you have to think in an actual referendum the remain campaign would be worth at least another 4% for leave...

    I mean given these are people who think it's actually a good idea to gloat about the number of grannies that have died since 2016...

    Image the kind of campaign they'd run in a second go-round.

    I think it'd be very close again but certainly wouldn't rule out NO DEAL winning a People's Vote.
    Perhaps, but it is all hypothetical anyway as the Commons would only ever allow a Remain v Deal 2nd referendum, it would never vote to allow No Deal on the ballot paper
    Unlike last time Parliament will no doubt ensure it picks referendum questions which ensure the public delivers the right answer! A remain vs May's deal referendum (no doubt stipulating May must lead the campaign for her deal!) would no doubt result in a clear remain win on a much lower turnout than in 2016 - as large sections of the country would have no option they could vote for.

    Not having a leave with no deal or other option would on some polling by like holding a general election in which the Tories or Labour were not allowed to stand! It would not lance the boil and merely confirm the division for good.

    Another wheeze would be to have multiple leave options - thus splitting the leave campaign and votes - and only one remain. Why couldn't we have multiple remain options as well - as remain isn't status quo for ever:

    remain - even if we lose our rebate at the next budget round
    remain but join Schengen and the Euro
    remain but just join Schengen
    Full European superstate and EU army now on speed!


This discussion has been closed.