Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » For Politicalbetting’s 15th anniversary today – a special cart

13567

Comments

  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,216
    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    Even the most primitive leaders realize that they are not just leaders for the half that voted for them but also the half that didn't. Even Mrs Thatcher paid lip service to it

    Mrs May has done everything to alienate the 16,5 million who voted Remain and this alone is why she's now such a dismal failure.

    And now by cancelling Brexit on 29th she's pissed off the 17.4m who voted leave...
    Tbf they already seem to be in a perpetual state of pissed off-ness.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,758
    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    Even the most primitive leaders realize that they are not just leaders for the half that voted for them but also the half that didn't. Even Mrs Thatcher paid lip service to it

    Mrs May has done everything to alienate the 16,5 million who voted Remain and this alone is why she's now such a dismal failure.

    And now by cancelling Brexit on 29th she's pissed off the 17.4m who voted leave...
    If only ...
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    How’s the Brexit petition and march going?
    Irrelevant. The policy decision was taken by national vote and its current measure of support is tested through properly weighted opinion polls, not self-selecting marches and petitions.
  • Options
    notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006

    "But Tony Blair’s actions have not looked like those of a man looking forward to an early retirement. His controversial but strategically brilliant move agreeing to the Euro referendum in April has really taken the edge of the Tory threat and has left Michael Howard without the anti-European rhetoric to deflect the continuing differences over the EU within the Conservative Party."
    Mike Smithson June 2004

    How times have changed!

    It was reneging on this referendum which caused the momentum towards Cameron offering a referendum on the treaty that followed.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Unless JRM is right that we will be hundreds of billions better off, and not just by investing in foreign stock markets like, erm, JRM.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    You are proposing that they have made up the numbers before the march has even assembled? Maybe a bit of a closed mind there?
    Today’s organisers will certainly overcook the numbers.
  • Options
    RobCRobC Posts: 398
    Many happy returns and congratulations to PB. In many ways this is a remarkable political blog - may it thrive for many more years yet!
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320

    matt said:

    Roger said:

    George O is VERY good on radio 4. When the history of Mrs May's many mistakes comes to be written her firing of him might come to be though of as her most egregious

    Being rejected generally changes people. I suspect that you would not have been so kind were he still Chancellor. Although I agree that was a catastrophic error and one I would think was pushed by people who did May’s thinking for her.

    Addendum- Michael Portillo remains for me the best example of rejection and change. Albeit I think he is a wooden and suboptimal television presenter, it’s clear that I’m in the minority.
    I think Portillo's rejection & change story is probably why he (slightly mystifyingly to me) is quite popular. Pastel coloured jackets and occasional self-deprecation go some way to obliterating the memory of his ghastly, onanistic SAS speech.
    You wonder if Osborne isn't secretly rather glad he's missing all of this. He could return to Parliament and become PM in the not too distant future as the person untainted by this mess and with a new perspective on life. After all, he's still not quite 48.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810

    Congratulations Mike and Robert. I’m pretty sure I predate Nick Palmer then-MP and Mr Herdson, both fine writers. I miss some of the former contributors, and was sorry to hear of the passing away of Mark Senior. Never an easy man to cross swords with, he was an astonishingly talented and well-informed advocate for his cause. I’m only popping in cos the provocative SeanT happened to say something nice about me, in passing, a few months ago. Another successful poke, or boot, from the bon viveur. Politicalbetting.com has, like all media outlets, it’s strengths and weaknesses, and I’m not sure that you two are fully aware of what they are. But on a personal level, the wise Mr Meeks (then Antifrank) once said something accurate about the world being full of transmitters and receivers, and that I was most definitely a transmitter. One of the strengths of PB is that it has nudged me a little way along the continuum to being a receiver. A minor achievement for you, but a bit of an eye-opener for me.

    Great to see you back Stuart (I lost my login details so have a new name these days)
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,216
    GIN1138 said:
    'Nigel doesn't have national trust'
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,027

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation
    My numbers aren’t made up there are completely factually based.

    I urge everyone to be very alert today to PV spin and propaganda. Because it will be coming.
    As I'm a Remainer with a very uncomfortable post-operative back, am I classified as a sore loser?
  • Options
    notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006

    notme2 said:

    The ‘losers’ are going to be all of us if a no deal Brexit happens.

    Well get your MP to vote for the WA.
    No thanks mate. Revoke all the way. Only way to end this thing.
    Are you naive enough to think that revoking article 50 ends all this?
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,183
    ydoethur said:

    matt said:

    Roger said:

    George O is VERY good on radio 4. When the history of Mrs May's many mistakes comes to be written her firing of him might come to be though of as her most egregious

    Being rejected generally changes people. I suspect that you would not have been so kind were he still Chancellor. Although I agree that was a catastrophic error and one I would think was pushed by people who did May’s thinking for her.

    Addendum- Michael Portillo remains for me the best example of rejection and change. Albeit I think he is a wooden and suboptimal television presenter, it’s clear that I’m in the minority.
    I think Portillo's rejection & change story is probably why he (slightly mystifyingly to me) is quite popular. Pastel coloured jackets and occasional self-deprecation go some way to obliterating the memory of his ghastly, onanistic SAS speech.
    You wonder if Osborne isn't secretly rather glad he's missing all of this. He could return to Parliament and become PM in the not too distant future as the person untainted by this mess and with a new perspective on life. After all, he's still not quite 48.
    He is untainted by this mess to be sure but his enthusiasm for Remain in 2016 will not ender him to the membership.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444

    IanB2 said:

    Roger said:

    George O is VERY good on radio 4. When the history of Mrs May's many mistakes comes to be written her firing of him might come to be though of as her most egregious

    Yep, he as good as suggested she isn't up to what lies ahead and should step down. Without being unnecessarily rude about it.

    Meanwhile the petition (which he has signed) should achieve 4,000,000 very soon. Oddly the only previous petition that just passed four million also did so on the Saturday of an anti-Brexit demonstration, if a much smaller one.
    The biggest petition ever was the one in June 2016, straight after the Leave vote, demanding an immediate re-run.

    Sore losers then. Bitter losers now.
    The one set up by Leavers in advance of the vote because they thought they were going to lose?
    That one?
    Which just goes to further prove my point about how it’s about the ends not the means.

    There’s no great stand for democracy here. The cynicism is extraordinary.
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    notme2 said:

    Ishmael_Z said:

    notme2 said:

    I have just remembered there is going to be a smorgasbord of smugness snaking its way through the streets of London today.

    The people are out on the streets, but the elites are just sneering condescendingly at them to put it another way.
    The sore losers you mean.
    Do fuck off, you silly little man. Do you really think, looking around you, that leave has anything to be triumphalist about just now?
    People who didn’t want to leave are still stamping their feet’s. Of course i’ll be triumphant. No Conservative prime minister is going to offer a second referendum, the only question is on how we will leave, leave will be done. The stamping of feet is so pleasurable to see, the impotence is so utterly delicious that it makes the whole monstrous nightmare worth while just to expose these people.
    No, i wasnt fussed in 2016 whether we stayed or left. I have only developed strong feelings on the matter since it became clear that leave's attempt to leave was degenerating into what you yourself call "a monstrous nightmare". So even on your infantile "yah boo sucks" level, you fail. Numpty.
  • Options
    JackW said:

    _Anazina_ said:

    The big news of the day is that Uri Geller has intervened to stop Brexit. The nation’s spoons are a small price to pay to stop this crazy madness.

    Mr. Anazina, we've reached a fork in the road. The nation's future is balanced on the edge of a knife.

    You made a hash (spoon) of that comment.

    I take such comments with a pinch of salt.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation
    My numbers aren’t made up there are completely factually based.

    I urge everyone to be very alert today to PV spin and propaganda. Because it will be coming.
    As I'm a Remainer with a very uncomfortable post-operative back, am I classified as a sore loser?
    No, you always conduct yourself with dignity and decorum even when we disagree.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation

    Remember, unless today’s Remain march can identify at least 51 attendees, it will have been beaten by the Leave march.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320

    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
    It's been in trouble for a while. In fact, it nearly went under five years ago. It isn't a great location really - while very beautiful, it's also very remote. When your nearest town is Rugeley, you don't have much for those who want bright lights and places to hang out (like, y'know, teenagers). And unlike Denstone its facilities weren't really good enough to compensate.

    But a phrase about straws and camel's backs springs to mind.
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,183

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    You are proposing that they have made up the numbers before the march has even assembled? Maybe a bit of a closed mind there?
    Today’s organisers will certainly overcook the numbers.
    I thought you were ignoring it? Seems to me like you’re getting your excuses in early.
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,818

    IanB2 said:

    Roger said:

    George O is VERY good on radio 4. When the history of Mrs May's many mistakes comes to be written her firing of him might come to be though of as her most egregious

    Yep, he as good as suggested she isn't up to what lies ahead and should step down. Without being unnecessarily rude about it.

    Meanwhile the petition (which he has signed) should achieve 4,000,000 very soon. Oddly the only previous petition that just passed four million also did so on the Saturday of an anti-Brexit demonstration, if a much smaller one.
    The biggest petition ever was the one in June 2016, straight after the Leave vote, demanding an immediate re-run.

    Sore losers then. Bitter losers now.
    The one set up by Leavers in advance of the vote because they thought they were going to lose?
    That one?
    Which just goes to further prove my point about how it’s about the ends not the means.

    There’s no great stand for democracy here. The cynicism is extraordinary.
    It does rather illustrate the double-standards on offer.
    Leavers love democracy and that's why they don't want another referendum and would have accepted the result if it went against them, while the democracy-hating Remainers signed a petition for another referendum.

    A referendum set up by (democracy-loving) Leavers who thought they were going to lose and didn't want to accept the result if it went against them...
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942

    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
    Private schooling will be hollowed out for plenty of the middle class. The obsession with very expensive sports facilities that only the rich can afford over simply providing a top notch education has grown and grown.
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,981

    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    Even the most primitive leaders realize that they are not just leaders for the half that voted for them but also the half that didn't. Even Mrs Thatcher paid lip service to it

    Mrs May has done everything to alienate the 16,5 million who voted Remain and this alone is why she's now such a dismal failure.

    And now by cancelling Brexit on 29th she's pissed off the 17.4m who voted leave...
    Tbf they already seem to be in a perpetual state of pissed off-ness.
    Yep, they've been the epitome of sore winners from June 24 2016 onwards.
  • Options
    notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006
    Ishmael_Z said:

    notme2 said:

    Ishmael_Z said:

    notme2 said:

    I have just remembered there is going to be a smorgasbord of smugness snaking its way through the streets of London today.

    The people are out on the streets, but the elites are just sneering condescendingly at them to put it another way.
    The sore losers you mean.
    Do fuck off, you silly little man. Do you really think, looking around you, that leave has anything to be triumphalist about just now?
    People who didn’t want to leave are still stamping their feet’s. Of course i’ll be triumphant. No Conservative prime minister is going to offer a second referendum, the only question is on how we will leave, leave will be done. The stamping of feet is so pleasurable to see, the impotence is so utterly delicious that it makes the whole monstrous nightmare worth while just to expose these people.
    No, i wasnt fussed in 2016 whether we stayed or left. I have only developed strong feelings on the matter since it became clear that leave's attempt to leave was degenerating into what you yourself call "a monstrous nightmare". So even on your infantile "yah boo sucks" level, you fail. Numpty.
    But we will be leaving very soon, and any rejoining terms will be so punitive we ain’t ever going back..
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,783
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320
    DougSeal said:

    ydoethur said:

    matt said:

    Roger said:

    George O is VERY good on radio 4. When the history of Mrs May's many mistakes comes to be written her firing of him might come to be though of as her most egregious

    Being rejected generally changes people. I suspect that you would not have been so kind were he still Chancellor. Although I agree that was a catastrophic error and one I would think was pushed by people who did May’s thinking for her.

    Addendum- Michael Portillo remains for me the best example of rejection and change. Albeit I think he is a wooden and suboptimal television presenter, it’s clear that I’m in the minority.
    I think Portillo's rejection & change story is probably why he (slightly mystifyingly to me) is quite popular. Pastel coloured jackets and occasional self-deprecation go some way to obliterating the memory of his ghastly, onanistic SAS speech.
    You wonder if Osborne isn't secretly rather glad he's missing all of this. He could return to Parliament and become PM in the not too distant future as the person untainted by this mess and with a new perspective on life. After all, he's still not quite 48.
    He is untainted by this mess to be sure but his enthusiasm for Remain in 2016 will not ender him to the membership.
    But since there is no plausible Leaver candidate fit to run a sub-post office - including a closed one - that may not be an issue in 36 months.
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,183

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation
    My numbers aren’t made up there are completely factually based.

    I urge everyone to be very alert today to PV spin and propaganda. Because it will be coming.
    Based on what evidence?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130
    Scott_P said:
    A newer, gentler kind of SNP?

    Nah, me neither.....
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,216
    Happy birthday to PB, it provides a comfortably uncomfortable place for this contrarian Nat to kick against the pricks (no names, no pack drill).
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    I must add my congratulations to Mike and the team for the continued success of the site.

    Without it, I doubt very much I would have had the opportunity to spend hundreds of pounds on a share of a racehorse.

    That raced twice...

    Well done, Mr Smithson :smile:
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,183

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    You are proposing that they have made up the numbers before the march has even assembled? Maybe a bit of a closed mind there?
    Today’s organisers will certainly overcook the numbers.

    And you won’t undercook them?
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Happy Birthday PB. I was an earlyish contributor in circa 2005 as I was reading PB from my work station.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    Casino - go back to bed and get some rest man.

    Your anguish will pass.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,844
    DougSeal said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Roger said:

    Even the most primitive leaders realize that they are not just leaders for the half that voted for them but also the half that didn't. Even Mrs Thatcher paid lip service to it

    Mrs May has done everything to alienate the 16,5 million who voted Remain and this alone is why she's now such a dismal failure.

    And now by cancelling Brexit on 29th she's pissed off the 17.4m who voted leave...
    More of a postponement than a cancellation surely?
    Don't know. There's no actual date for when we leave now and my suspicion is that now 29th March has slipped it's probably not going to happen at all.

    Leavers best route to Brexit may be a second referendum and a "tell them again" campaign which I suspect would be highly successful?
  • Options
    notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006
    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
    Private schooling will be hollowed out for plenty of the middle class. The obsession with very expensive sports facilities that only the rich can afford over simply providing a top notch education has grown and grown.
    And private schools have not been able to maintain the differential between public funded schools. The government largesse on state schooling leaves them unable to offer much extras. If you have a nice expensive home in the right area of town you are likely to have pretty good access to a first rate primary or secondary school.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Why are people trying to undermine today’s march before it happens? They seem a little worried about it. Surely with Brexit so righteous and popular it will be a damp squib. Leavers should be more confident.
  • Options
    Great news! My son goes to high school in September. Literally across the playing fields from us is a newish build Academy - wonderful facilities, great staff and a great headteacher. The problem was that the multi academy trust were Godawful - the news this morning is that they are disposing of the school and we can forge a better future without them
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,981
    _Anazina_ said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation

    Remember, unless today’s Remain march can identify at least 51 attendees, it will have been beaten by the Leave march.
    All to play for.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    You are proposing that they have made up the numbers before the march has even assembled? Maybe a bit of a closed mind there?
    Today’s organisers will certainly overcook the numbers.

    And you won’t undercook them?
    No.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320
    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
    Private schooling will be hollowed out for plenty of the middle class. The obsession with very expensive sports facilities that only the rich can afford over simply providing a top notch education has grown and grown.
    Since the only part of Abbot's Bromley that made a profit was its swimming pool, I'm not sure I agree.

    In fact, the only really major cost for private schools are staff salaries, which tend to be about 10% higher than in state schools. That, on its own, is one reason why pensions are proving disastrous.

    And that, in turn, means state schools are facing huge hikes in pension contributions next year to make up the shortfall as private schools close or withdraw. Coupled with frozen pay and collapsing staff retention rates, I'm expecting soaring staff/student ratios and wondering when the strikes will happen.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    Jonathan said:

    Why are people trying to undermine today’s march before it happens? They seem a little worried about it. Surely with Brexit so righteous and popular it will be a damp squib. Leavers should be more confident.

    The target of 51 attendees to beat the Leave march has been set. Leave have points on the board - and it’s not a gimme by any means.
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    Congratulations on the anniversary. I cannot remember how I came across the site but have been looking at the site for a long time and contributing for a long time, originally as ChrisP. My current moniker was suggested during a confusing conversation which included two other Posters called Chris!

    The real strength of the site is the range of opinions and experiences. A real hallmark of this site over others is that people are mostly genuinely respectful and polite even where we don’t agree. Thanks to all the admins, contributors and other posters for supporting the site.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    _Anazina_ said:

    Casino - go back to bed and get some rest man.

    Your anguish will pass.

    I’m good, cheers.

    I just hate spin and bullshit, which is at the heart of today’s march in both its message and its size.

    If you want me to say some generous I’ll say this: I have a modicum of respect for those signing the latest petition to revoke article 50 unilaterally, because at least they’ve broken cover and are being honest.
  • Options
    GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 20,862
    CasinoRoyale’s pissboiling contempt of democratic protest is a fantastic example of the general attempt by Brexiters to run roughshod over the rights of at least 48% of the country.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Are you insinuating that there were in fact fewer than the published 50 attendees at the recent Leave march?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320

    Great news! My son goes to high school in September. Literally across the playing fields from us is a newish build Academy - wonderful facilities, great staff and a great headteacher. The problem was that the multi academy trust were Godawful - the news this morning is that they are disposing of the school and we can forge a better future without them

    The implication of that post is that there are some MATs that are not godawful.

    Which ones would they be?

    I'll happily work in standalone academies, but never ever again in an MAT.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,844
    Jonathan said:

    Why are people trying to undermine today’s march before it happens? They seem a little worried about it. Surely with Brexit so righteous and popular it will be a damp squib. Leavers should be more confident.

    I don't know why they are even having a "People's Vote" march. Brexit has been cancelled by Theresa May and the government.

    For Remainers things couldn't be going any better at this point... A referendum is probably more dangerous to Remainers than the current course which is just to gradually kick the thing into the long grass and very slowly strange Brexit at birth.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation
    My numbers aren’t made up there are completely factually based.

    I urge everyone to be very alert today to PV spin and propaganda. Because it will be coming.
    As I'm a Remainer with a very uncomfortable post-operative back, am I classified as a sore loser?
    I've a hunch(back) you should put some spine into your comments ....
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    We await your own made-up numbers with eager anticipation
    My numbers aren’t made up there are completely factually based.

    I urge everyone to be very alert today to PV spin and propaganda. Because it will be coming.
    Based on what evidence?
    GLA reports, police estimates (unpublished) and academic analysis.

    A lie travels half-way round the world before the truth gets its trousers on.

    The Met police never challenged the original fantasy PV estimate of “700k”, which itself was a travesty and probably a political decision within the organisation, so the propaganda number was never publicly contested and became gospel.

    It is now repeatedly quoted by mindless lazy morons incapable of thinking or analysing for themselves, and the public is misled.
  • Options
    notme2notme2 Posts: 1,006
    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
  • Options
    NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,311
    Scott_P said:
    Corbyn literally travelling hundreds of miles to avoid the march. At least he didn’t join the Leave march
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444

    CasinoRoyale’s pissboiling contempt of democratic protest is a fantastic example of the general attempt by Brexiters to run roughshod over the rights of at least 48% of the country.

    Congratulations on creating the biggest straw man and non sequitur of the day.
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Chill and read this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump

    Scroll down to crowd size. The police and drone or helicopter photos will give some objective numbers, plus it seems there is such a thing as a professor of crowd science, so there.
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,981
    _Anazina_ said:

    Jonathan said:

    Why are people trying to undermine today’s march before it happens? They seem a little worried about it. Surely with Brexit so righteous and popular it will be a damp squib. Leavers should be more confident.

    The target of 51 attendees to beat the Leave march has been set. Leave have points on the board - and it’s not a gimme by any means.
    Call me an absurd optimist, but I think we can do it!!
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Congratulations Mike, Robert, and TSE, on the enduring success of this site.

    As a denizen of the Betfair forums at the time I'm sure I must have started reading almost immediately, though I can't recall when I made my first post. The 2005 General Election was the first one I was in (joint) charge of producing odds for. I was working for Ladbrokes at the time; I moved to Staffordshire and bet365 a few years later.

    I hugely value the diversity of this site and have certainly been influenced by the arguments made from across the spectrum, both above and below the line. Seeing your opponents' point of view more clearly can never be a hindrance: you can choose to use it as it way of sharpening your rebuttal, or as part of a process of synthesis. I recall learning in school debating competitions that the way to win a debate is not to take pot shots at your opponents' weaker points or ill-chosen examples, but to take on the core argument they are making.

    But obviously many of us here hold our core beliefs sufficiently strongly that we are not likely to persuade each other: nevertheless the exercise is still useful and also helps us all to disagree in good humour (for the most part).

    Thank you too for hosting my thoughts above the line from time to time. The array of contributors you have persuaded to post there also serves as a testament to the quality of the audience you have built. Particular thanks to those who have produced posts week-in and week-out: Sean Fear in the earlier days; and David Herdson for what must be getting close to a decade? And of course Alastair Meeks & Cyclefree have been particularly prolific in the last couple of years.

    Last but not least, this site has been an enduring source of betting value. Thanks to everyone who's provided tips and insight. I'll gently remind OGH that I have a 100/1 tip for next President currently trading at 9/1; wouldn't it be a shame to see the famous 50/1 Obama tip eclipsed? [Roger: "No"]

    PB.com has been a huge part of my ever-more-political life for the last 15 years. Thank you once again for both the idea and the execution.

    Aaron
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    _Anazina_ said:

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Are you insinuating that there were in fact fewer than the published 50 attendees at the recent Leave march?
    I’m talking about the PV march.

    I’m not interesting in march size dick-measuring beteeen PV and LeavemeansLeave as the true measure of the support of both.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,218
    Very many congratulations Mike.

    This is a great site and my go to place for news and comment, with some really interesting and informative comments below the line. I first came across it in 2007 and lurked for a long time before venturing a comment. I also want to thank you for publishing my articles. It is a privilege.

    And I am finally putting a bet on! There’s no point rushing these things. :)
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    Ishmael_Z said:

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Chill and read this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump

    Scroll down to crowd size. The police and drone or helicopter photos will give some objective numbers, plus it seems there is such a thing as a professor of crowd science, so there.
    PV are the Trumpians.

    He overestimated his crowd size, just like them.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,216

    CasinoRoyale’s pissboiling contempt of democratic protest is a fantastic example of the general attempt by Brexiters to run roughshod over the rights of at least 48% of the country.

    The amount of scalding piss around nowadays will surely result in a condition named Leavers' Urethra entering future medical textbooks.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    Cyclefree said:

    Very many congratulations Mike.

    This is a great site and my go to place for news and comment, with some really interesting and informative comments below the line. I first came across it in 2007 and lurked for a long time before venturing a comment. I also want to thank you for publishing my articles. It is a privilege.

    And I am finally putting a bet on! There’s no point rushing these things. :)

    On what?
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    CR, sincere advice. Breathe. Turn off the media. Go for a walk. Play with the little one. Today will just be one long wind up exercise for you. It will pass. Best ignored. Keep your powder dry for next week.
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    Ishmael_Z said:

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Chill and read this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump

    Scroll down to crowd size. The police and drone or helicopter photos will give some objective numbers, plus it seems there is such a thing as a professor of crowd science, so there.
    PV are the Trumpians.

    He overestimated his crowd size, just like them.
    I always find it easier to assess events after they have actually happened. Chill.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    If it comes to it, I’d (reluctantly) take it too even though it pisses all over the part of the vote against free movement.

    Maybe we could beef up the emergency brake clause.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    You can indeed, but ignoring what other people think and continuing to plough the same furrow isn't proving a particularly successful strategy for Theresa May right now.

    Oh, and happy birthday PB, and thank you to Smithsons senior, junior, TSE and all. Alternately insightful and exasperating but that's as it should be, and quite the most compelling political site at the moment. I live in hope that one day it will move off the Web 0.5 platform that is Vanilla...
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,444
    Ishmael_Z said:

    Ishmael_Z said:

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Chill and read this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump

    Scroll down to crowd size. The police and drone or helicopter photos will give some objective numbers, plus it seems there is such a thing as a professor of crowd science, so there.
    PV are the Trumpians.

    He overestimated his crowd size, just like them.
    I always find it easier to assess events after they have actually happened. Chill.
    I agree, but I’m altering people to the (inevitable) bullshit spin so they are alert to it when it happens later today and viewing it with a sceptical eye.

    I wouldn’t have to if the authorities did their job properly.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    HYUFD said:
    I can't tell from that tweet which side he's on in the Brexit debate.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,855
    notme2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
    Private schooling will be hollowed out for plenty of the middle class. The obsession with very expensive sports facilities that only the rich can afford over simply providing a top notch education has grown and grown.
    And private schools have not been able to maintain the differential between public funded schools. The government largesse on state schooling leaves them unable to offer much extras. If you have a nice expensive home in the right area of town you are likely to have pretty good access to a first rate primary or secondary school.
    I tend to agree. What's the point of spending £300 K educating two children privately, when you can use the same money to move to a place with good State schools, and still have a valuable asset?
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,855
    Congratulations on the site. I think I came here within a couple of months of it starting.
  • Options
    Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 4,817
  • Options
    solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623
    Happy birthday to PB!

    I've not been here nearly as long as most but have been reading for a few years and posting regularly more recently. A great source of discussion, information and analysis. And puns.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942
    AndyJS said:

    HYUFD said:
    I can't tell from that tweet which side he's on in the Brexit debate.
    Corbyn fan.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Congratulations to PB, the best politics site on the internet.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320

    Happy birthday to PB!

    I've not been here nearly as long as most but have been reading for a few years and posting regularly more recently. A great source of discussion, information and analysis. And puns.

    Humour is the thing that keeps the site punning smoothly.

    I'll get my coat.

    Have a good weekend.
  • Options
    ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,819
    Congrats to the PB team. The articles always take an interesting and non-partisan approach, and the comment section is really one of the few (only?) political forums worth participating in. I go through phases of posting and lurking but have been reading the site for a few years now, and through some excellent tips posted here (particularly whoever tipped Lab to hold Yns Mons at 12/1 in the last election, thank you!) I'm a bit richer thanks to PB as well!
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,855
    AndyJS said:

    HYUFD said:
    I can't tell from that tweet which side he's on in the Brexit debate.
    I think he's Faisal Islam, using a pseudonym.
  • Options

    Congratulations Mike and Robert. I’m pretty sure I predate Nick Palmer then-MP and Mr Herdson, both fine writers. I miss some of the former contributors, and was sorry to hear of the passing away of Mark Senior. Never an easy man to cross swords with, he was an astonishingly talented and well-informed advocate for his cause. I’m only popping in cos the provocative SeanT happened to say something nice about me, in passing, a few months ago. Another successful poke, or boot, from the bon viveur. Politicalbetting.com has, like all media outlets, it’s strengths and weaknesses, and I’m not sure that you two are fully aware of what they are. But on a personal level, the wise Mr Meeks (then Antifrank) once said something accurate about the world being full of transmitters and receivers, and that I was most definitely a transmitter. One of the strengths of PB is that it has nudged me a little way along the continuum to being a receiver. A minor achievement for you, but a bit of an eye-opener for me.

    Good to hear from you, Stuart. We crossed swords here many years ago. I was "Alan" or "Alan J" back then.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    The petition map site is b0rked too at the moment, but last night it was showing some truly remarkable numbers in Remainia Profonde. Both Cambridge and Bristol West were well above 15%, nudging 20%. Boston and Skegness was, shall we say, a little lower.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810

    _Anazina_ said:

    DougSeal said:

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    It hasn’t even started yet. How can they be making up numbers? And you’re not doing a very good job of ignoring it.
    The numbers will certainly be made up.

    Here’s how it works: organisers start by saying they expect “tens of thousands” to attend in friendly newspapers, thus setting expectations low (see here, for an example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-march-london-put-it-to-the-people-live-updates-article-50-a8836386.html) they know at this time what their true numbers will be from their pledges, coaches, trains and organisers, which I expect today will be in the 300-350k box.

    Later on they’ll declare the numbers to be “way above expectations” and go for the highest number they can credibly defend, and they’ll want it to be higher than 700k and, ideally, get a headline saying it’s “close to a million”.

    This is spin. This is politics. This is how it WORKS.

    And, they are advised by Alastair Campbell. Who is very very good at it.
    Are you insinuating that there were in fact fewer than the published 50 attendees at the recent Leave march?
    I’m talking about the PV march.

    I’m not interesting in march size dick-measuring beteeen PV and LeavemeansLeave as the true measure of the support of both.
    Presumably though your analysis would suggest the Leave march numbers were inflated? A shocking allegation Casino!
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    If it comes to it, I’d (reluctantly) take it too even though it pisses all over the part of the vote against free movement.

    Maybe we could beef up the emergency brake clause.
    Both Corbyn and May need to pivot to Common Market 2.0 shortly or the FBPE lot are going to depose Corbyn and the Tories will lose power for a long long time.
  • Options
    TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,713
    On the train to London. Not for the March but for a show my daughter is in. Very busy, not helped by the original train being cancelled. Lots of EU flags and support on display in the train and good natured.

    I may have voted LEAVE but I’ve got to admit May has made a complete hash of the process.

    I wish she’d resign, though that wouldn’t necessarily help with the LOTO even worse!
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,101
    Sean_F said:

    notme2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    Incidentally, when I was criticising Labour's policy on school fees and saying it would raise no money and inflict much higher costs on state schools, many people scoffed at me.

    They might benefit from reading this story:

    https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/burton/abbots-bromley-school-closure-2669716

    That is because of pension changes which have increased employer costs by 7%. It will not be the last school to close this summer as a result.

    What do people think will happen if costs rise by 20%?

    That's such a shame. Several of my family (and more friends) attended AB, and I went to another school in the group.

    It was a good place.
    Private schooling will be hollowed out for plenty of the middle class. The obsession with very expensive sports facilities that only the rich can afford over simply providing a top notch education has grown and grown.
    And private schools have not been able to maintain the differential between public funded schools. The government largesse on state schooling leaves them unable to offer much extras. If you have a nice expensive home in the right area of town you are likely to have pretty good access to a first rate primary or secondary school.
    I tend to agree. What's the point of spending £300 K educating two children privately, when you can use the same money to move to a place with good State schools, and still have a valuable asset?
    A generation or more back one of the advantages of a private education was how it would increase the chances of a university education.

    But with it now be much easier but much more expensive to go to university that reason has effectively disappeared.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,313
    Pulpstar said:

    AndyJS said:

    HYUFD said:
    I can't tell from that tweet which side he's on in the Brexit debate.
    Corbyn fan.
    Precisely
  • Options
    OllyTOllyT Posts: 4,913
    edited March 2019

    IanB2 said:

    4,000,239

    It’s quite funny how the “people’s vote” march today has been overtaken by those who want to skip that step and jump straight to unilateral revocation.

    And they are precisely the same people.

    We can ignore their march today just as we can ignore their made-up numbers.
    How’s the Brexit petition and march going?
    Irrelevant. The policy decision was taken by national vote and its current measure of support is tested through properly weighted opinion polls, not self-selecting marches and petitions.
    Those properly-weighted opinion polls also indicate that people do not now want to leave.
    Nothing is settled yet and therefore remainers are absolutely right to keep up the pressure for a second referendum etc.

    Whether you like it or not today's march will be compared to Farage's pitiful effort (is it still going?) and people will notice. Same with the petition, 4 million signatories in a few days is newsworthy and it's getting plenty of coverage. It's all about shaping the political narrative and where we go from here. Remainers are winning the PR battle hands dow. It may not ultimately matter but you can't blame them from trying.
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    Thomas

    Risky. Public expressions of confidence can come back to bite you.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,293

    TM is nearing the end of the road let down by brexiteers with an unrealistic agenda and remainers who never accepted the result

    She attempted a compromise that is a good deal and respects the vote without completely destroying business and would have generated goodwill throughout Europe if it had passed first time

    TM has many flaws but I doubt anyone could have achieved a harmonious departure from the EU

    I cannot see the point in her going now but she must be running out of time and I expect a successor election from May, with a new PM by summer with a GE to follow fairly soon after

    That is a fair evaluation of TM. A mediocre politician but made to look worse by circumstances. Like you, I doubt that anybody else would have done materially better with the hospital pass of Brexit.

    Oh and that's good news that you are no longer so down on that GENERAL ELECTION that is coming. Wonder who will win it, Corbyn or Gove?

    :-)
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,844
    Pulpstar said:

    notme2 said:

    HYUFD said:
    I would grab this with both hands, but I’m not an ERG zealot or a revoking hypocrite.
    If it comes to it, I’d (reluctantly) take it too even though it pisses all over the part of the vote against free movement.

    Maybe we could beef up the emergency brake clause.
    Both Corbyn and May need to pivot to Common Market 2.0 shortly or the FBPE lot are going to depose Corbyn and the Tories will lose power for a long long time.
    The Tories are going to lose power for a long time whatever happens.

    It's all over.
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,818

    IanB2 said:

    Roger said:

    George O is VERY good on radio 4. When the history of Mrs May's many mistakes comes to be written her firing of him might come to be though of as her most egregious

    Yep, he as good as suggested she isn't up to what lies ahead and should step down. Without being unnecessarily rude about it.

    Meanwhile the petition (which he has signed) should achieve 4,000,000 very soon. Oddly the only previous petition that just passed four million also did so on the Saturday of an anti-Brexit demonstration, if a much smaller one.
    The biggest petition ever was the one in June 2016, straight after the Leave vote, demanding an immediate re-run.

    Sore losers then. Bitter losers now.
    The one set up by Leavers in advance of the vote because they thought they were going to lose?
    That one?
    Which just goes to further prove my point about how it’s about the ends not the means.

    There’s no great stand for democracy here. The cynicism is extraordinary.
    It does rather illustrate the double-standards on offer.
    Leavers love democracy and that's why they don't want another referendum and would have accepted the result if it went against them, while the democracy-hating Remainers signed a petition for another referendum.

    A referendum set up by (democracy-loving) Leavers who thought they were going to lose and didn't want to accept the result if it went against them...
    Very late edit: for "referendum" in the last sentence, read "petition"

    D'Oh.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,216

    Congratulations Mike and Robert. I’m pretty sure I predate Nick Palmer then-MP and Mr Herdson, both fine writers. I miss some of the former contributors, and was sorry to hear of the passing away of Mark Senior. Never an easy man to cross swords with, he was an astonishingly talented and well-informed advocate for his cause. I’m only popping in cos the provocative SeanT happened to say something nice about me, in passing, a few months ago. Another successful poke, or boot, from the bon viveur. Politicalbetting.com has, like all media outlets, it’s strengths and weaknesses, and I’m not sure that you two are fully aware of what they are. But on a personal level, the wise Mr Meeks (then Antifrank) once said something accurate about the world being full of transmitters and receivers, and that I was most definitely a transmitter. One of the strengths of PB is that it has nudged me a little way along the continuum to being a receiver. A minor achievement for you, but a bit of an eye-opener for me.

    Good to see you posting. Any views on the Scottish dimension of the current imbroglio?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,728
    Standing room only on Midland Main Line, full of Remainiacs :)
This discussion has been closed.