Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » You can’t blame Bercow for enforcing what is a sensible preced

SystemSystem Posts: 12,172
edited March 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » You can’t blame Bercow for enforcing what is a sensible precedent

The speaker, John Bercow, as you’d expect, gets a lot of stick from the right wing press this morning following his ruling yesterday stopping the tabling of the government motion for a third time.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,483
    First?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497
    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497
    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,298
    The deal was going to go down to another big defeat again.
    I don't see that Bercow has made Brexit more or less likely through this action.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Good morning, everyone.

    Mr. rkrkrk, he did remove the slim chance of the deal going through. Perhaps more significantly, whatever dubious action he takes next in this matter will be seen in the light of what he did yesterday.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,289
    If one contends that the people knew exactly what they were doing when they voted, that must surely apply equally to GE2017 as to the referendum.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.

    The main mistake the campaign made was telling the truth about how social care needs to be funded. We can bet that no party will make that mistake again.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.

    the tories are just a shower of shite atm, no unity, no ideas, no purpose.

    fortunately for them Labour are just as bad.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497
    rkrkrk said:

    The deal was going to go down to another big defeat again.
    I don't see that Bercow has made Brexit more or less likely through this action.

    I think a defeat by about 50-60 votes.

    PfP got the maths right.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497

    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.

    the tories are just a shower of shite atm, no unity, no ideas, no purpose.

    fortunately for them Labour are just as bad.
    Yes, but May’s lack of majority is a big part of the reason for that.

    A hung parliament is just crippling.
  • Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    "You can't just keep voting until you get the result you want" (c) all Brexiteers until very, very recently.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Indeed.

    And it's the same principle that keeps Mrs May herself in her job, Tory Party rules preventing her malcontent MPs from re-tabling a confidence vote in her for a year after the previous one.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497
    AndyJS said:

    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.

    The main mistake the campaign made was telling the truth about how social care needs to be funded. We can bet that no party will make that mistake again.
    It took the electorate and victory for granted.

    Timothy forgot the first rule of manifesto writing: sell a programme for Government that the electorate can buy into and wins votes.

    Instead he stuck all the turds that the Government wanted a mandate to do - but would normally be coy about or avoid - because he took a landslide for granted, and presented precious little positive vision of a better future to compensate.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    rkrkrk said:

    The deal was going to go down to another big defeat again.
    I don't see that Bercow has made Brexit more or less likely through this action.

    The government minister on R4 this morning saying Bercow had made Brexit more complicated clearly didn't seem to understand this. Brexit always was complicated.

    The strategy of putting the same failing proposition to a vote over and over might have been simple, but it had become displacement activity for a government unable or unwilling to face the facts.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.

    the tories are just a shower of shite atm, no unity, no ideas, no purpose.

    fortunately for them Labour are just as bad.
    Yes, but May’s lack of majority is a big part of the reason for that.

    A hung parliament is just crippling.
    nah cant see it

    what do the conservatives actually stand for these days ? Cameron had no ideology and treated it like a big PR exercise. That 10 year gap is still at the heart of the conservatives and since they cant find a purpose they cant find unity.

    by contrast Jezza has an ideology but its pissing off half his party and theyre too spineless to do anything about it.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    The rest of the article is fair comment. May clearly needed a majority of about 50+ and came up about 35 MPs short.

    This is why I find it so hard to listen to the criticisms of Nick Timothy, who is totally culpable in this.

    the tories are just a shower of shite atm, no unity, no ideas, no purpose.

    fortunately for them Labour are just as bad.
    Yes, but May’s lack of majority is a big part of the reason for that.

    A hung parliament is just crippling.
    Except that extra seats for the Tories could easily have meant extra nutters on her own side.
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Knowing little about parliamentary procedure I always assumed a Speaker was meant to be impartial, a sort of referee. He may be, but once he or she become the main talking point, it means they're failing.

    I don't argue about the ruling, but I'm surprised he didn't warn the miscreants he was intending to do this. That looks like showboating.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,741

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    In other news, from last night's Standard:

    Senior members of the shadow cabinet have told The Londoner that they understand Jeremy Corbyn would like to step down as leader of the Labour Party. The sources say that a number of those around the leader are also of the view that Corbyn, who is 70 in May, would like to pass on the reins of his surprisingly successful socialist project. One member of the shadow cabinet told us: “He’s tired and fed up.” Another: “Corbyn is ready to step down. He wants to step down.”
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,483
    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    CD13 said:

    Knowing little about parliamentary procedure I always assumed a Speaker was meant to be impartial, a sort of referee. He may be, but once he or she become the main talking point, it means they're failing.

    I don't argue about the ruling, but I'm surprised he didn't warn the miscreants he was intending to do this. That looks like showboating.

    He DID warn them, saving the embarrassment of having their motion tabled and then ruled out of order.

    The government hadn't put anything down for debate, nor advised the Speaker they so intended. Bercow was reacting ahead of time on the basis of media speculation.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,617
    IanB2 said:

    Indeed.

    And it's the same principle that keeps Mrs May herself in her job, Tory Party rules preventing her malcontent MPs from re-tabling a confidence vote in her for a year after the previous one.

    Can we prorogue the 1922 Committee? Re-set the clock?
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,741

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    It has no legal force. There has to be a positive vote for something else.

    The track record of May at meetings with the EU27 leaders is so pisspoor that we shouldn't expect her to get much on Thursday.

    The Tories chose a dud, then decided to stick with her.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,741

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    They've had what you might call a King Canute vote, but they haven't decided what form of sea defences they intend to build to hold back the inevitable legal tide of leaving without a deal.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,617
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    It has no legal force. There has to be a positive vote for something else.

    The track record of May at meetings with the EU27 leaders is so pisspoor that we shouldn't expect her to get much on Thursday.

    The Tories chose a dud, then decided to stick with her.
    The ERG-ers were cheering because No Deal is still very much in rude good health.

    Many have been saying that a half-arsed PM and a half-arsed Parliament would stumble into a half-arsed No Deal Brexit, despite it being literally the worst thing any of them could ever imagine. I am now somewhat less skeptical of that outcome than I was.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,167
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    It has no legal force. There has to be a positive vote for something else.

    The track record of May at meetings with the EU27 leaders is so pisspoor that we shouldn't expect her to get much on Thursday.

    The Tories chose a dud, then decided to stick with her.
    It will likely be a 21 month extension quite possibly leading to No Brexit at all, Parliament has already voted for extension and the EU may well demand that long or else the Withdrawal Agreement with the backstop amended to a permanent Customs Union
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Not all of "France" is on Strike.....
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Just so brexit maniacs dont feel we're all alone, here's the Germans saying Macron is a laughing stock and France is not a serious country

    https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article190488619/Gelbwesten-in-Paris-Die-Regierung-Macron-wirkt-erschreckend-hilflos.html
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Not all of "France" is on Strike.....
    never is

    but just enough to fk things up for the rest of the country
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    Thinking about it, Bercow probably is right. There's another explicitly soft Brexit option that would solve the DUP issue and would likely pass in parliament. It would break the Tories, but that isn't the Speaker's problem.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497
    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    Brexit isn’t about narrow minded nativism, dumbo.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    Morning PB - Unless there's a legal change we're now ten day from "departure" deal or no deal! :D
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,497

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.


    These marches really f**k me off and boil my piss.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,741
    HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    It has no legal force. There has to be a positive vote for something else.

    The track record of May at meetings with the EU27 leaders is so pisspoor that we shouldn't expect her to get much on Thursday.

    The Tories chose a dud, then decided to stick with her.
    It will likely be a 21 month extension quite possibly leading to No Brexit at all, Parliament has already voted for extension and the EU may well demand that long or else the Withdrawal Agreement with the backstop amended to a permanent Customs Union
    I think 21 months too, as that matches the WA, but we will have to explain and justify the delay.

    Mrs May is not good at explaining things though.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    edited March 2019
    I thought the decision, while well within the scope of the Speaker’s discretion, was a poor one given that sands did seem to be shifting. However, the government’s response since is effectively to continue to ignore the fact that its policy has been crushingly defeated twice and ruled beyond consideration without changes and to seek cosmetic changes only. That is worse.

    The government has to rethink properly.
  • Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    Brexit isn’t about narrow minded nativism, dumbo.
    That description certainly applies for a proportion of the Brexit vote, inspired at a popular level by people with other goals.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    It has no legal force. There has to be a positive vote for something else.

    The track record of May at meetings with the EU27 leaders is so pisspoor that we shouldn't expect her to get much on Thursday.

    The Tories chose a dud, then decided to stick with her.
    As did the electorate and the House of Commons...
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,247
    A glimpse of future negotiations ?

    https://www.thelocal.ch/20190318/swiss-mps-agree-to-pay-1-billion-for-eu-cohesion-fund
    The elephant in the room was the current stand-off between Bern and Brussels over a deal that aims to set the ground rules for their future relations.

    The draft of the so-called framework agreement has been years in the making. It is designed to tidy up relations which are currently based on around 20 main agreements and 100 secondary agreements.

    The EU – frustrated by years of protracted talks – has repeatedly said the deal on the table is a done thing and there will be no more talks.

    But within Switzerland the draft agreement has been met by a barrage of criticism, with many arguing it is dead in the water. The left argue threatens the country’s high wages by watering down salary protection measures while the right believes the document's legal mechanisms seriously threaten Switzerland’s sovereignty....
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,741

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    Brexit isn’t about narrow minded nativism, dumbo.

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.


    These marches really f**k me off and boil my piss.
    The Cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.

    Laters guys, it's off to work I go :)
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Mr Brooke,

    Cameron was a good politician as was Blair who he copied, but that isn't a compliment. May is verging on being totally useless as a politician, but retains a certain sympathy because she seems to be the only adult in the room (even with her incompetence). Dealing effectively with the squabbling children after the referendum would take the patience of a saint and the skills of a diplomat. She has neither, but at least looks as if she's trying.

    One group thought they'd won and now have gone into mardy-mode after seeing the prize being sneaked away, the other group can't come to terms with being defied. Both have a strong feeling of entitlement.

    Jezza was a joke pick, but is actually learning how to be a politician (brains aren't required).

    The LDs have lost their gloss. Lying about pledges and not even playing lip-service to democracy doesn't fit with what it says on the tin. they'll be a long rime coming back.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.


    These marches really f**k me off and boil my piss.
    Calm down, dear (TM)

    I only get annoyed when they clog up the traffic

    Tourists on the Abbey Road zebra crossing are more irritating
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    GIN1138 said:

    Morning PB - Unless there's a legal change we're now ten day from "departure" deal or no deal! :D

    255 hours!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,167
    Foxy said:

    HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    It has no legal force. There has to be a positive vote for something else.

    The track record of May at meetings with the EU27 leaders is so pisspoor that we shouldn't expect her to get much on Thursday.

    The Tories chose a dud, then decided to stick with her.
    It will likely be a 21 month extension quite possibly leading to No Brexit at all, Parliament has already voted for extension and the EU may well demand that long or else the Withdrawal Agreement with the backstop amended to a permanent Customs Union
    I think 21 months too, as that matches the WA, but we will have to explain and justify the delay.

    Mrs May is not good at explaining things though.
    A majority of Tory MPs have already voted to keep No Deal on the table and not extend Article 50, it is only SNP, LD and Labour MPs and Tory Remainer rebels who have forced the extension vote through so even if the EU demanded EUref2 or permanent Customs Union for extension I think that group would vote it through
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,167
    edited March 2019
    Scott_P said:
    The Speaker could call the Kyle amendment etc first and only allow the MV to be voted on again if that passes or MPs could vote to ignore the convention and allow the MV to be held
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,617
    Scott_P said:
    Then everyone can blame the death of Brexit on one man.....
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,167
    edited March 2019

    Not all of "France" is on Strike.....
    never is

    but just enough to fk things up for the rest of the country
    France has different problems to Britain. Much worse inter-ethnic cohesion and bouts of self-righteous hubris among its political class, but more broadly a stronger and more questioning resistance to forces that have weakened communities and cultural and intellectual horizons in Britain over the last thirty years.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.


    These marches really f**k me off and boil my piss.
    Well that's not the intention, but it is certainly a bonus.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    CD13 said:

    Mr Brooke,

    Cameron was a good politician as was Blair who he copied, but that isn't a compliment. May is verging on being totally useless as a politician, but retains a certain sympathy because she seems to be the only adult in the room (even with her incompetence). Dealing effectively with the squabbling children after the referendum would take the patience of a saint and the skills of a diplomat. She has neither, but at least looks as if she's trying.

    One group thought they'd won and now have gone into mardy-mode after seeing the prize being sneaked away, the other group can't come to terms with being defied. Both have a strong feeling of entitlement.

    Jezza was a joke pick, but is actually learning how to be a politician (brains aren't required).

    The LDs have lost their gloss. Lying about pledges and not even playing lip-service to democracy doesn't fit with what it says on the tin. they'll be a long rime coming back.

    Cameron couldnt do party management thats not the basis for being a successful leader. Cameron was a man with a lot of potential who frittered his political capital away on idiocies.

  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    It would mean all those things, none of those things and everything else you can imagine.

    Just as Brexit has been impossible to pin down. But right now it simply means not Brexit, not this mess, and especially not Theresa May's mess.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    It would mean all those things, none of those things and everything else you can imagine.

    Just as Brexit has been impossible to pin down. But right now it simply means not Brexit, not this mess, and especially not Theresa May's mess.
    precisely

    remainers dont understand what they are seeking to remain in, therein lies a whole new set of problems
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    We'll work something out.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,617
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    The Speaker could call the Kyle amendment etc first and only allow the MV to be voted on again if that passes or MPs could vote to ignore the convention and allow the MV to be held
    Westminster can Take Back Control.....from the Speaker!
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    We'll work something out.
    J Recidivist-Mogg
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    Brexit isn’t about narrow minded nativism, dumbo.

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.


    These marches really f**k me off and boil my piss.
    The Cognitive dissonance is strong in this one.

    Laters guys, it's off to work I go :)
    Me too. But let's all remember what Oscar Wilde said. There comes a time when speaking out for what is right and decent ceases to be an obligation and becomes a pleasure.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Scott_P said:
    The government in another impressive display of political imagination.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Scott_P said:
    An idiotic move given that the ruling has been given broad expert support.

    At the least it means MV3 is the last throw of the dice, and there won't be an MV4
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Jonathan said:

    Scott_P said:
    The government in another impressive display of political imagination.
    The Einstein quote about insanity does seem to apply here.
  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.


    These marches really f**k me off and boil my piss.
    Why?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,537
    Scott_P said:
    Good luck with that strategy. Bercow enjoys people trying to intimidate him and makes a point of doing the opposite.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain

    For me, it starts with not regarding the countries closest to us as enemies seeking to do us down.

  • _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    Not referring to French people as Frogs while clutching our pearls at the phrase Little Englander, as is commonplace on this forum, would be a start. From small acorns doth mighty oaks grow.
  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    Can someone please remind me, did Parliament vote for a specific length of extension, or just the generic concept ?
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Mr Meeks,

    Albert denied he said it. But I know what you mean.

    I feel like a political orphan. May is incompetent, Corbyn has the brains of an intelligent cabbage, and the LDs are anything but democratic. Fortunately, the rest of the electorate seem to be joining me in my opinion of politicians.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868
    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    MaxPB said:

    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.

    The government literally has no other idea what to do.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain

    For me, it starts with not regarding the countries closest to us as enemies seeking to do us down.

    Well thats the Euro Disney version, but out in the wide world countries do compete and national interests clash. You dont have to think of your neighbour as an enemy if you dont agree on a point.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    It would mean all those things, none of those things and everything else you can imagine.

    Just as Brexit has been impossible to pin down. But right now it simply means not Brexit, not this mess, and especially not Theresa May's mess.
    precisely

    remainers dont understand what they are seeking to remain in, therein lies a whole new set of problems
    Speak for yourself. I knew what I was voting for in 2016 and I would be very content with the deal now, which is leaving (much as some doltish Leavers don’t seem to think so).

    If the government forces another referendum on us I would have a lot of thinking to do. And googling.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    Can someone please remind me, did Parliament vote for a specific length of extension, or just the generic concept ?

    I believe the wording was general, but it was on the basis put by the PM - a short extension if there is a deal and a long one if there is not, subjec obviously to the EU's response
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    edited March 2019
    _Anazina_ said:

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    Not referring to French people as Frogs while clutching our pearls at the phrase Little Englander, as is commonplace on this forum, would be a start. From small acorns doth mighty oaks grow.
    There is hardly a monoply on name calling on this site everyone does it to some extent, they simply differ on the targets.
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,802
    Well if he pissed off the Mail and the Sun he must have done the right thing.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    MaxPB said:

    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.

    Good displacement activity, people can blame Bercow for a bit instead of concentrating on the issues. But a decision has to eventually be made and god knows what it is but I don't expect yours to be the route taken...

    I guess that is what you think the government should do rather than what you think it will do?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    TOPPING said:

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain
    It would mean all those things, none of those things and everything else you can imagine.

    Just as Brexit has been impossible to pin down. But right now it simply means not Brexit, not this mess, and especially not Theresa May's mess.
    precisely

    remainers dont understand what they are seeking to remain in, therein lies a whole new set of problems
    Speak for yourself. I knew what I was voting for in 2016 and I would be very content with the deal now, which is leaving (much as some doltish Leavers don’t seem to think so).

    If the government forces another referendum on us I would have a lot of thinking to do. And googling.
    LOL

    how could you know what you were voting for. Youre old and stupid and blinded by buses and you were lied to.

    Really Mr T stop bigging yourself up :-)
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,146
    edited March 2019
    On reflection I believe Bercow's ruling is correct and I actually consider it is good news for TM as it prevents her suffering a further defeat this week just before the EU Council and it does open the window to an indication, if not confirmation, of an extension, or otherwise, and the conditions the EU may well demand from the UK

    In a strange way this will focus minds on the EU and even indicate a pathway to the future.

    Of course, ERG knee jerk reaction was to high five each other and whistle the great escape but, sadly, their intelligence levels are so non existent they would not realise how idiotic they look.

    My concern with Bercow is that he clearly is not independent, and actively attempts to put roadblocks in front of brexit, and at the same time smirks at his own arrogance and preens like a narcissist, which is wholly unacceptable from someone who should demonstrate neutrality and even handedness at all times.

    Also his attack on some of the front bench and reply to Andrea Leadsom was unacceptable, bullying, and verging on mysogyny
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    Bercow looks Happy again, at least.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    MaxPB said:

    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.

    Good displacement activity, people can blame Bercow for a bit instead of concentrating on the issues. But a decision has to eventually be made and god knows what it is but I don't expect yours to be the route taken...

    I guess that is what you think the government should do rather than what you think it will do?
    Logically I don't see an alternative May will go for.

    She is committed now to ask for a long extension. A long extension must have a purpose. Another election is preferable to another referendum.
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Mr Brooke,

    I'd define my son as being pro-Europe. He lives and works in Copenhagen but is amused by some of their characteristics - in a very British way. He has an Irish passport but supports the English rugby team (league and union). He's marrying a Danish woman, can speak Danish, but they both speak English at home. And he'd probably have voted Remain, but remains cynical about the EU as an organisation.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    MaxPB said:

    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.

    Good displacement activity, people can blame Bercow for a bit instead of concentrating on the issues. But a decision has to eventually be made and god knows what it is but I don't expect yours to be the route taken...

    I guess that is what you think the government should do rather than what you think it will do?
    Logically I don't see an alternative May will go for.

    She is committed now to ask for a long extension. A long extension must have a purpose. Another election is preferable to another referendum.
    An election is very possible (as much as other things) I just wasn't sure about the whole binding Tory MPs to the deal, maybe involving deselection (I assumed that part wrongly maybe)

    The maybe 30-40 ultimate holdouts (from both ends of the party) are too much damage I would have thought...
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449

    MaxPB said:

    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.

    Good displacement activity, people can blame Bercow for a bit instead of concentrating on the issues. But a decision has to eventually be made and god knows what it is but I don't expect yours to be the route taken...

    I guess that is what you think the government should do rather than what you think it will do?
    Logically I don't see an alternative May will go for.

    She is committed now to ask for a long extension. A long extension must have a purpose. Another election is preferable to another referendum.

    MaxPB said:

    What's the point in bringing MV3 back, even if the speaker doesn't rule it out of order it will fail by at least 50 votes. Even if the DUP can be bought, that's 30 votes short. Where are the government going to find 10 further converts and 10-20 abstentions?

    Bercow did the government and May a favour, go back to Brussels, get an extension and find a deal that will pass through the house or hold an election to bind Tory MPs to the deal with a manifesto commitment.

    Good displacement activity, people can blame Bercow for a bit instead of concentrating on the issues. But a decision has to eventually be made and god knows what it is but I don't expect yours to be the route taken...

    I guess that is what you think the government should do rather than what you think it will do?
    Logically I don't see an alternative May will go for.

    She is committed now to ask for a long extension. A long extension must have a purpose. Another election is preferable to another referendum.
    Why? A GE would effectivley be a 2nd referendum but with the votes of anyone who doesn’t live in a safe seat ignored
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain

    For me, it starts with not regarding the countries closest to us as enemies seeking to do us down.

    Well thats the Euro Disney version, but out in the wide world countries do compete and national interests clash. You dont have to think of your neighbour as an enemy if you dont agree on a point.

    Yes, I know. I’m a pro-European.

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    CD13 said:

    Mr Brooke,

    I'd define my son as being pro-Europe. He lives and works in Copenhagen but is amused by some of their characteristics - in a very British way. He has an Irish passport but supports the English rugby team (league and union). He's marrying a Danish woman, can speak Danish, but they both speak English at home. And he'd probably have voted Remain, but remains cynical about the EU as an organisation.

    my son's not much different. UK and Irish passports, French girlfriend, supports Ireland in Rugby, England in football, follows Paris saint Germain, voted Leave as he's totally cynical about the EU bureaucracy.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?

    Full integration into the EU with currency, borders and defence ?
    Some halfway house which is neither in nor out ?
    Eating croissants while holidaying in the Dordogne ?

    Can you explain

    For me, it starts with not regarding the countries closest to us as enemies seeking to do us down.

    Well thats the Euro Disney version, but out in the wide world countries do compete and national interests clash. You dont have to think of your neighbour as an enemy if you dont agree on a point.

    Yes, I know. I’m a pro-European.

    Like me, but Im not pro EU
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,167
    edited March 2019

    Scott_P said:
    Good luck with that strategy. Bercow enjoys people trying to intimidate him and makes a point of doing the opposite.
    Yes. And beyond the tabloid headline reaction my sense is also that the popular reaction to this isn't quite as the government might have hoped. Large numbers of reader contributors at the Mail's website, for instance, seem to be vastly enjoying this reversal for the government.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653

    CD13 said:

    Mr Brooke,

    I'd define my son as being pro-Europe. He lives and works in Copenhagen but is amused by some of their characteristics - in a very British way. He has an Irish passport but supports the English rugby team (league and union). He's marrying a Danish woman, can speak Danish, but they both speak English at home. And he'd probably have voted Remain, but remains cynical about the EU as an organisation.

    my son's not much different. UK and Irish passports, French girlfriend, supports Ireland in Rugby, England in football, follows Paris saint Germain, voted Leave as he's totally cynical about the EU bureaucracy.

    The luxury of an entirely consequence-free vote. Lucky lad. He will continue to benefit from all the EU offers.

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    Foxy said:

    Just been emailing around organising transport for our trip to London for the march on Saturday. It's a measure of the confused state of the government's handling that we aren't entirely sure what we'll be protesting against/for yet.

    Yes, but important to show the depth of Pro Europe opinion in the country, for the world to see that we will not be defined by narrow minded nativism. See you there, weather forecast looks good!
    What does Pro Europe actually mean ?
    Guy explains:

    https://twitter.com/theJeremyVine/status/1107718377336909826
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    Can someone please remind me, did Parliament vote for a specific length of extension, or just the generic concept ?


    Since no extension of any duration is within their gift......
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    Scott_P said:
    Good luck with that strategy. Bercow enjoys people trying to intimidate him and makes a point of doing the opposite.
    Yes. And beyond the tabloid headline reaction my sense is also that the popular reaction to this isn't quite as the government might have hoped. Large numbers of reader contributors at the Mail's website, for instance, seem to be vastly enjoying this reversal for the government.
    People don't need to be experts in parliamentary procedure to see the vacuity in putting the same thing to the vote over and over.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    CD13 said:

    Mr Brooke,

    I'd define my son as being pro-Europe. He lives and works in Copenhagen but is amused by some of their characteristics - in a very British way. He has an Irish passport but supports the English rugby team (league and union). He's marrying a Danish woman, can speak Danish, but they both speak English at home. And he'd probably have voted Remain, but remains cynical about the EU as an organisation.

    my son's not much different. UK and Irish passports, French girlfriend, supports Ireland in Rugby, England in football, follows Paris saint Germain, voted Leave as he's totally cynical about the EU bureaucracy.

    The luxury of an entirely consequence-free vote. Lucky lad. He will continue to benefit from all the EU offers.

    Im glad you have come round to my point of view. Ive been telling you for ages there will be no serious consequences post Brexit but youve been glooming me with economic disasters, food shortgaes, war death and plague.

    In other news youve been beaten to the annual drought warning by the Environment Agency

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47620228
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,006

    Foxy said:

    Remainer supports Remainer Speaker frustrating Brexit: shock.

    Nah, What the Speaker has done is neutral. That is why the hard Brexiteers were cheering. The default is No Deal Brexit on the 29th, not Remain.
    Wasn't there a vote which said that couldn't happen?
    They've had what you might call a King Canute vote, but they haven't decided what form of sea defences they intend to build to hold back the inevitable legal tide of leaving without a deal.
    I prefer the Cnut spelling.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    The man's a total fkwit. he lives in a world where Queen Victoria is still on the throne and the english aspire for world domination.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,167
    edited March 2019
    Excellent. Brief but covers many essential points. He always brings a unique kind of psycho-political perspective to things.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    I do think the picture editors have done a more entertaining job than the headline writers.

    Bercow is his own worst enemy (not while I'm alive, says Andrea) - a procedurally perfectly defensible move (arguably a week late) done before the government tabled any motion, thus saving it some embarrassment, snookered by his smug pompous hectoring style.
This discussion has been closed.