politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As Trump’s legal troubles mount punters now make it a 34% chance that he’ll win WH2020
If it wasn’t for Brexit we’d be doing several threads a week about the US and particularly the prospects for Trump as the investigations appear to be getting closer.
Be nice for Hillary. After all the abuse she's suffered over the years seeing one of her biggest bullies fall from grace so spectacularly would be some kind of karma.
Be nice for Hillary. After all the abuse she's suffered over the years seeing one of her biggest bullies fall from grace so spectacularly would be some kind of karma.
If Trump really wanted to lock up Hillary he should have offered her a job.
In the long run, it’s not clear how Labour and the Conservatives will accommodate our modern ferment. At the 2017 election, Jeremy Corbyn’s party piled on votes from young, urban and educated people and the Tories found new openings among working-class Brexit supporters, but the result only highlighted our national deadlock. Though Brexit looks to me like an epochal disaster to which the best answer is probably another public vote, there is another question, which politicians’ inevitable fixation with backstops, borders and customs unions leaves untouched: how the array of deep social and cultural questions tangled up in the events of the last two years will eventually be settled. I also wonder how we construct online spaces, public institutions and media outlets that might protect some coherent idea of the national interest and genuinely public debate. One thing, though, seems obvious: that we are in the midst of things we have only just begun to understand, and the deafening noise from Westminster is only the start.
"Fifty percent of Asian investors in EY's latest U.K. Attractiveness Report said they were most worried about losing market access to the EU, compared with 39% of all investors," said Mark Gregory, the company's chief economist for the U.K.
"This reflects the fact that many invest in the U.K. to export to the EU or to locate their regional headquarters."
According to Gregory, "Twenty-five percent of Asian investors say they will move assets out of the U.K. in the next three years, compared with 8% overall."
Piers Morgan is truly dreadful on Good Morning Britain
Those last four words are redundant.
I am not so sure. He makes people phone up a lot. I reckon ITV love it.
Wow. I knew PB drew from across the community, but to find a Piers Morgan fan is genuinely remarkable.
I am not a fan. I was making the point that however ghastly he may be viewers are interacting with ITV by phone and social media . ITV will love it, however disliked he may be.
Strangely enough, I hope Parliament passes a bill to withdraw Article 50. That, at least, would be honest. Admitting that pledging to honour the referendum vote was always a lie. Basically telling the voters that Parliament controls the country's future and not the voters. It's a 'come and have a go if you think you're hard enough' challenge.
Well, another step toward remain is taken. The EU already doesn't believe we will no deal because of how many people say we won't, and thus probably dont see the need to improve their offer, and now they have even less reason to do so as our remain contingent can prevent it altogether rather than no deal.
I wonder how many mps will be honest in their memoires that they never had any intention of leaving if the opportunity arose to remain.
You’ve already lost one despite having the Gov of the day on your side. We had to wait 40 years for a referendum. You want a second after just 2. We should honour the first referendum before having a second.
If I were a Brexiteer I’d see today’s judgment as a chance to start again, armed with the knowledge that the EU has shown exactly how it will handle a Brexit negotiation.
Only a little. It's silly it's unilaterally revocable given potential for being jerked around but if we don't leave no one else will even dare contemplate it, and they get our money forever now, which is the only thing they care about our membership anyway. That's worth the theoretical chance of others messing them about and the continued annoyance of our reluctant membership.
If the government tables its futile deal-no deal referendum, the question is whether there is a majority in Parliament either to add Remain making it a three-way, or replacing no deal with Remain.
You were wrong only in failing to realise that the ECJ is not a rational court of law but is instead a political arm of the "ever closer union" project.
We can either Remain on current terms of rejoin soon replete with membership of the Euro and Schengen.
Your call.
If only it were that simple... the problem is then what happens with the 'next stage' of EU interegation..
Staying is now however the logical choice.
Dave’s Deal looking even better by the day.
I wonder if that’s still available.
A compromise would be this.
Stay in EU Write into the withdrawal agreement that ANY additional 'transfer of power' to the EU must be subject to a referendum, so thats stated in law.
That way, we stay, but the leavers get a chance to block any further change to our status and relationship with the EU.
There won’t be a referendum because Parliament won’t be able to agree a second (or third etc) option (other than remain) to put on the ballot paper. So the only way we remain is if we revoke without a referendum.
We can either Remain on current terms of rejoin soon replete with membership of the Euro and Schengen.
Your call.
If only it were that simple... the problem is then what happens with the 'next stage' of EU interegation..
Staying is now however the logical choice.
Dave’s Deal looking even better by the day.
I wonder if that’s still available.
A compromise would be this.
Stay in EU Write into the withdrawal agreement that ANY additional 'transfer of power' to the EU must be subject to a referendum, so thats stated it law.
That way, we stay, but the leavers get a chance to block any further change to our status and relationship with the EU.
There won’t be a referendum because Parliament won’t be able to agree a second (or third etc) option (other than remain) to put on the ballot paper. So the only way we remain is if we revoke without a referendum.
So no deal must be strong favourite now.
I’m happy with No Deal.
Honours the referendum result and ensures we Rejoin within a decade.
There won’t be a referendum because Parliament won’t be able to agree a second (or third etc) option (other than remain) to put on the ballot paper. So the only way we remain is if we revoke without a referendum.
The Republican establishment can think what it likes, as long as Trump retains the support of the GOP base he will nominee again and as long as the Republicans hold the Senate he is unlikely to be successfully impeached. Indeed if the Democrats pick a left liberal populist like Sanders, Warren or Harris or Ocasio-Cortez he would have a chance of winning the general election again as indeed he would if the Democrats pick a centrist again who does not connect
Mr. Slackbladder, that won't happen. The pro-EU types won't want to risk another chance for the Great Unwashed to stand in the way of their glorious European future.
Mr. Eagles, someone posted here, and it had the ring of truth, that two options were being considered for a second referendum should the 11 December vote be lost.
The first was May's Deal versus Remain.
The second was a two stage referendum, starting Remain versus Leave, then going to May's Deal versus No Deal, should Leave win the first stage.
How likely do you think it is, bearing in mind it would seem to be MPs generally deciding, that it'll be the former?
We can either Remain on current terms of rejoin soon replete with membership of the Euro and Schengen.
Your call.
If only it were that simple... the problem is then what happens with the 'next stage' of EU interegation..
Staying is now however the logical choice.
Dave’s Deal looking even better by the day.
I wonder if that’s still available.
A compromise would be this.
Stay in EU Write into the withdrawal agreement that ANY additional 'transfer of power' to the EU must be subject to a referendum, so thats stated in law.
That way, we stay, but the leavers get a chance to block any further change to our status and relationship with the EU.
You’ve already lost one despite having the Gov of the day on your side.
Tainted with lies and fear.
Lies like the Treasury forecast and punishment budget you mean. Project Fear was a Remain ploy not a Leave one.
Being wrong is not the same as lying.
I suspect that the Treasury* believed there would be an immediate recession in the event of Brexit.
* Not that everyone in the Treasury would think that way, but groupthink is powerful.
The Treasury have since admitted they were very selective about the assumptions they used on Osborne’s instructions. That is lying. No doubt, when Hammond has gone, which can’t happen soon enough, a similar admission will be made.
"Stay in EU Write into the withdrawal agreement that ANY additional 'transfer of power' to the EU must be subject to a referendum, so thats stated it law."
You're suggesting we'd then trust a government that pledges to uphold a referendum result? Really?
Bien joué grand, Sturgeon. Although she may have inadvertently saved the England-Scotland union for now. Northern Ireland are psychologically in the departure lounge now that it's been graphically illustrated how few fucks the British establishment gives about them.
There won’t be a referendum because Parliament won’t be able to agree a second (or third etc) option (other than remain) to put on the ballot paper. So the only way we remain is if we revoke without a referendum.
So no deal must be strong favourite now.
Parliment sure as hell won't that happen.
So you say. There may be a majority to try to prevent it, but to do so (as it is the default) you need a majority for an alternative. I don’t think there is one.
Mr. Slackbladder, that won't happen. The pro-EU types won't want to risk another chance for the Great Unwashed to stand in the way of their glorious European future.
Mr. Eagles, someone posted here, and it had the ring of truth, that two options were being considered for a second referendum should the 11 December vote be lost.
The first was May's Deal versus Remain.
The second was a two stage referendum, starting Remain versus Leave, then going to May's Deal versus No Deal, should Leave win the first stage.
How likely do you think it is, bearing in mind it would seem to be MPs generally deciding, that it'll be the former?
I think any self-serving MP will have two priorities in this: (1) Not to be seen to be going against The Will Of The People. (2) To minimise the likelihood that they will share any responsibility for a "No Deal" outcome.
Comments
But I suspect a GOP Senate will never vote to convict Trump.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/09/joe-biden-2020-vermont-bernie-sanders-1054071
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/10/brexit-divides-tensions-political-vote
What time is the ECJ decision due?
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-Trends/Japanese-companies-look-to-Germany-and-Holland-amid-Brexit-fears
According to consultants EY, Asian businesses tend to have a more negative view of the consequences of Brexit than companies from elsewhere.
"Fifty percent of Asian investors in EY's latest U.K. Attractiveness Report said they were most worried about losing market access to the EU, compared with 39% of all investors," said Mark Gregory, the company's chief economist for the U.K.
"This reflects the fact that many invest in the U.K. to export to the EU or to locate their regional headquarters."
According to Gregory, "Twenty-five percent of Asian investors say they will move assets out of the U.K. in the next three years, compared with 8% overall."
How did she ever become a cabinet minister ?
A bit of a problem for the EU that....
https://twitter.com/eucourtpress/status/1072039706123210752?s=21
That doesn't help Theresa May one little bit.
Well done to Nicola Sturgeon
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/10/brexit-date-is-not-irreversible-says-man-who-wrote-article-50-lord-kerr
Hands up Leavers who are frit of the electorate?
That effectively pushes No deal, and bad deal off the table though...
We can either Remain on current terms of rejoin soon replete with membership of the Euro and Schengen.
Your call.
Genuinely surprised by the ECJ ruling, but May’s travails just got a whole lot worse. Interesting times!
If Brexiteers had any sense they should accept TM deal or it is all over for a generation
The only one which will get through Parliament.
Staying is now however the logical choice.
Mr. Johnstone, not watched it myself but isn't Charlotte Hawkins on it?
I wonder how many mps will be honest in their memoires that they never had any intention of leaving if the opportunity arose to remain.
Remain and Leave in a second referendum are 4 and 4.5 respectively.
I realise that the Brexit project requires a number of gullible punters, but I don't think Big G is among their them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3oBDj5a3VE
Dave’s Deal looking even better by the day.
I wonder if that’s still available.
I’m off to hum and sing ‘Ode to joy’ at the top of my lungs.
Revocation of A50 on Tuesday... submission of A50 on Wednesday...
Stay in EU
Write into the withdrawal agreement that ANY additional 'transfer of power' to the EU must be subject to a referendum, so thats stated in law.
That way, we stay, but the leavers get a chance to block any further change to our status and relationship with the EU.
I'd take that, would you?
I suspect that the Treasury* believed there would be an immediate recession in the event of Brexit.
* Not that everyone in the Treasury would think that way, but groupthink is powerful.
So no deal must be strong favourite now.
I got 15/1 at 10pm on the day of the vote....
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Act_2011
Honours the referendum result and ensures we Rejoin within a decade.
Mr. Eagles, someone posted here, and it had the ring of truth, that two options were being considered for a second referendum should the 11 December vote be lost.
The first was May's Deal versus Remain.
The second was a two stage referendum, starting Remain versus Leave, then going to May's Deal versus No Deal, should Leave win the first stage.
How likely do you think it is, bearing in mind it would seem to be MPs generally deciding, that it'll be the former?
A comfortable majority of the country oppose both extremes
"Stay in EU
Write into the withdrawal agreement that ANY additional 'transfer of power' to the EU must be subject to a referendum, so thats stated it law."
You're suggesting we'd then trust a government that pledges to uphold a referendum result? Really?
(1) Not to be seen to be going against The Will Of The People.
(2) To minimise the likelihood that they will share any responsibility for a "No Deal" outcome.