Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Whatever the numbers today’s march will reinforce both CON and

SystemSystem Posts: 12,173
edited October 2018 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Whatever the numbers today’s march will reinforce both CON and LAB anti-Brexit MPs

Inevitably there are massively different estimates of how many people have been marching in London today against Brexit but judging by the TV pictures it does seem to be very large. Whether it’s up to the anti Iraq war demonstrations of 2003 I don’t know but it’s still pretty substantial.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • No surrender
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    edited October 2018
    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    On topic, no. Desperate stuff from a desperate Remainer.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    'So the next six months could see BINO, a postponement of Article 50, a decision on a new referendum or Britain leaving without a deal. It could also see a new general election and a new CON leader.'

    But that aside, it should be fairly quiet on the political front.
  • You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.
  • FPT
    tlg86 said:

    I reckon Mourinho has real issues. He needs to take a break from football.

    Somebody needs to stick their finger in Mourinho's eye for the LOLZ.
  • ydoethur said:

    'So the next six months could see BINO, a postponement of Article 50, a decision on a new referendum or Britain leaving without a deal. It could also see a new general election and a new CON leader.'

    But that aside, it should be fairly quiet on the political front.

    Mike hasn't informed me of any holidays he's got scheduled.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202

    You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    If No Deal I think that is likely, if May can agree the backstop for NI (and even most NI voters want to stay in the SM and CU) then a FTA for GB is still possible and Brexit can be saved.

  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,710
    If there's that many folk it'll be more of a shuffle than a march, presumably.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    My main problem with a second referendum is that I have yet to meet anyone on either side who would vote any differently. There are a number of younger people who would vote in this one but I'm not sure that there'd be enough to tip the balance. it would remain very close and not resolve the situation in the long term.
  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Eagles, you yourself wanted to leave the EU, or so you said. But you wanted to wait a decade.

    Those on the losing side are often more fired up. Just from a psychological perspective, if we do have another vote and choose to remain it'd be interesting to see how, and how soon, they'd deploy a 'we've settled the issue, now let's unite' line.

    If we do leave and things go poorly, many of those who wanted to leave (assuming we have no deal, if we have one, May will be blame for capitulation) will blame hardline EU-philes for batting for the other side.

    As for fear, there are worse things than that. If the electorate are taught democracy means asking the electorate until they give the 'right' answer that will have profoundly negative consequences for the body politic. Not only that, the political class will have learnt the pesky voters can't be trusted, massively reducing the chances of any future referendum being offered by mainstream parties (and the far left socialist organisation squatting on the Opposition benches currently).
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    F1: it's weird having qualifying so late. The pre-qualifying ramble should be up in about five and a half hours or so.

    The delayed qualifying is apparently due to the cretins in charge having the concert before rather than after qualifying. Nincompoops.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    spudgfsh said:

    My main problem with a second referendum is that I have yet to meet anyone on either side who would vote any differently. There are a number of younger people who would vote in this one but I'm not sure that there'd be enough to tip the balance. it would remain very close and not resolve the situation in the long term.

    No Deal though would likely shift the balance to Remain
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Incidentally, the odds on a second referendum before the end of 2019 haven't changed recently. Still 4 on Ladbrokes.
  • grabcocquegrabcocque Posts: 4,234
    edited October 2018
    Reading through the comments here today, I realise that *nothing* brings out the self-pitying whining of right wingers more than a mass protest.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The real question is whether Kantar’s finding of a Remain 60:40 lead will be echoed by other pollsters. If opinion starts shifting in that way then the idea of a second referendum producing a decisive result doesn’t look so far fetched and Brexit sceptics will be emboldened.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    Reading through the comments here today, I realise that *nothing* brings out the self-pitying whining of right wingers than a mass protest.

    I'm disappointed you missed the opportunity to go for a pun about 'right whingers'...
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    HYUFD said:

    spudgfsh said:

    My main problem with a second referendum is that I have yet to meet anyone on either side who would vote any differently. There are a number of younger people who would vote in this one but I'm not sure that there'd be enough to tip the balance. it would remain very close and not resolve the situation in the long term.

    No Deal though would likely shift the balance to Remain
    The only way the matter would be settled properly by another referendum if there was a significant win for one side or the other. I'd go for 60/40 and in order to win by that margin the pro-EU side would have to win another 4000000 votes or so. I can't see even the no-deal scenario making that much of a difference
  • grabcocquegrabcocque Posts: 4,234
    One way or another, all the signs point to the beginning a decisive shift in British public opinion towards the EU, and we have the Brexit Buccanneers to thank for this generous gift.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    edited October 2018
    Stop. I've got exactly what's happening here.

    Peoples vote are being advised on spin by Alastair Campbell. He's worked out (correctly) that it matters little whether the headline numbers are 80,000 or 240,000. What happens is the game of expectations management.

    He's doing a reverse bus. He knew correctly that turnout today would be well north of 200k, but the spin was over a hundred thousand until just a couple of hours ago. It was just a question of how to pitch the number and when.

    We know this because they declared turnout too early and too accurately, at exactly 570k, by lunchtime. It doesn't matter whether it's 500k, or 300k now. And debating it from Leavers will just keep the story in the headlines. And the story will be "exceeded all expectations" now when, actually, this was precisely their expectation all along.

    Clever. They are being advised expertly on PR.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506

    You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    Traitor.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494

    The real question is whether Kantar’s finding of a Remain 60:40 lead will be echoed by other pollsters. If opinion starts shifting in that way then the idea of a second referendum producing a decisive result doesn’t look so far fetched and Brexit sceptics will be emboldened.

    A poll by populus conducted on the day before the referendum had remain on a 10% lead. I'd be very careful into reading what you want into a single poll
  • grabcocquegrabcocque Posts: 4,234

    You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    Traitor.
    I think you meant traiteur because we all know he's a sweetie.
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    The real question is whether Kantar’s finding of a Remain 60:40 lead will be echoed by other pollsters. If opinion starts shifting in that way then the idea of a second referendum producing a decisive result doesn’t look so far fetched and Brexit sceptics will be emboldened.

    Their poll on 15th October would make it 52% Remain to 48% Leave. Are you thinking of the non-comparable poll that included 15 year olds and non-citizens?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    spudgfsh said:

    The real question is whether Kantar’s finding of a Remain 60:40 lead will be echoed by other pollsters. If opinion starts shifting in that way then the idea of a second referendum producing a decisive result doesn’t look so far fetched and Brexit sceptics will be emboldened.

    A poll by populus conducted on the day before the referendum had remain on a 10% lead. I'd be very careful into reading what you want into a single poll
    Which is why I didn’t.
  • You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    Traitor.
    Harsh on Gove.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    I think the critical point is the parliamentary position. As the header implies the Iraq War protest situation could essentially be ignored because the parliamentary position was secure. With Brexit the position is far from secure, so while I simply do not believe the march, like any march, is actually significant in itself, it does reflect that the situation is very up in the air, and it is not as though what they want (which is not a vote, let's be honest, it is a vote with the right outcome ) is impossible to obtain.

    But then again it does seem as though each side is its own worst enemy sometimes. Some purist Brexiteers are so desperate for proper Brexit they may unintentionally scupper hope of any Brexit (in fairness some may intentionally do that, thinking no Brexit is better than a bad Brexit), while others who pretend they will do anything to stop no deal (pretend because they won't actually vote for any deal, making their protests hollow) make see no no deal happen as they chase an ultimate prize of Remain.

    And that is really May's problem - since all options really are still on the table, some more plausibly than others, there's no reason for continuity remainers to vote for a deal, and no reason for Brexiteers to vote for a deal, since both think they can get what they want instead.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,746
    RoyalBlue said:

    The real question is whether Kantar’s finding of a Remain 60:40 lead will be echoed by other pollsters. If opinion starts shifting in that way then the idea of a second referendum producing a decisive result doesn’t look so far fetched and Brexit sceptics will be emboldened.

    Their poll on 15th October would make it 52% Remain to 48% Leave. Are you thinking of the non-comparable poll that included 15 year olds and non-citizens?
    No polls so far have been based on the real choice - the one that Theresa May is confronted with.
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    Reading through the comments here today, I realise that *nothing* brings out the self-pitying whining of right wingers more than a mass protest.

    In a liberal democracy with freedom of the press that has had a referendum on the issue in hand, a mass protest is the definition of self-pitying whining.

    Today’s march will not change anyone’s mind. All it will do is consolidate existing views on both sides.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    Traitor.
    Harsh on Gove.
    Reckless of you to make that comment...
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March

    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Congratulations to them, being able to say a cool half million turned out is a nice, sizable figure to use. Given how formulaic today is in praise and dismissal of the event, I do wonder at what point either lot would have had to change their messaging - 1 million and thought some lines could still be used in dismissal the tone would surely have to be different, less than 100k I think definitely would put a block on some of the more optimistic rallying cries.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    FPT

    tlg86 said:

    I reckon Mourinho has real issues. He needs to take a break from football.

    Somebody needs to stick their finger in Mourinho's eye for the LOLZ.
    I hadn’t seen what that idiot from the Chelsea backroom staff did. They all deserve each other.

    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    Sorry, but I think this is nonsense. There is a sizeable minority who would have stay in even if we had got a moon on a stick.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    More bollocks from someone who talks constant bollocks.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    Strictly speaking didn't 4 million already demand a second referendum in a petition to parliament?
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    I'm guessing the bar for perceived success in the turnout estimation would be to exceed that of the countryside march.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301

    You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    Traitor.
    Harsh on Gove.
    Ought to be a new measurement of time, how long before someone is called a traitor in the comments.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    kle4 said:

    I'm guessing the bar for perceived success in the turnout estimation would be to exceed that of the countryside march.

    Which the People's Vote claims it already has but we need to see Police estimates too
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    It’s the lack of introspection on the Leave side about why it’s all going so terribly that’s most illuminating. So long as they get to indulge their antipathy to the EU, they simply don’t care how damaging Brexit is.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    I think parliament will fail to agree any options and therefore asking the people again will be necessary just to get things moving again (though that will be a sign of the failure of parliament) but that marches are only significant when parliament cannot decide rather undermines the inherent significance of even a very large march.
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223
    Scott_P said:
    “People’s Vote. Rally. Demand.”

    Mob rule. No thanks.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    spudgfsh said:

    HYUFD said:

    spudgfsh said:

    My main problem with a second referendum is that I have yet to meet anyone on either side who would vote any differently. There are a number of younger people who would vote in this one but I'm not sure that there'd be enough to tip the balance. it would remain very close and not resolve the situation in the long term.

    No Deal though would likely shift the balance to Remain
    The only way the matter would be settled properly by another referendum if there was a significant win for one side or the other. I'd go for 60/40 and in order to win by that margin the pro-EU side would have to win another 4000000 votes or so. I can't see even the no-deal scenario making that much of a difference
    No Deal takes it to 55% Remain 45% Leave ie the same margin as the 2014 indyref vote according to YouGov

    http://uk.businessinsider.com/yougov-poll-voters-would-rather-remain-in-eu-than-accept-a-no-deal-brexit-2018-7
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    HYUFD said:

    kle4 said:

    I'm guessing the bar for perceived success in the turnout estimation would be to exceed that of the countryside march.

    Which the People's Vote claims it already has but we need to see Police estimates too
    If memory serves police estimates for marches tend to be quite a bit lower than organisers, clearly both have an interest in downplaying or overplaying the numbers.

    But I'd agree with the view that quibbling over the precise numbers is not really worth it for opponents. Unless the organisers are out by a significant factor, say by half, and they can be labelled as Trump like to be mocked for overegging it, there is enough truth to say it is very big, whether it is, say, 400k or 700k. The same arguments will continue to apply for or against a second referendum whichever is correct.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,621
    The march still s stretches from Park Lane to Parliament Square with people still joining. It's truly massive. Not a SWP banner in sight. A counter demo by six kippers got as ironic cheer. Bless.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    I'm not one for crowds, in any situation really. What does one do if caught near the centre and you really need to use the lavatory? Cannot be easy to fight your way to somewhere on the edge with portaloos.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. HYUFD, I maintain the best hope for Remain is a terrible May deal. That'll depress in both senses Leave voters.

    No deal will worry some a lot, but for others they'll be glad of the opportunity to leave. May's capitulation would be worse than either staying or leaving.

    Of course, we'll never know which one of us is right, but that's what I think.

    And, if there is to be another vote, it must be next year. Any later than that, and my bet won't come off.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    HYUFD said:

    spudgfsh said:

    HYUFD said:

    spudgfsh said:

    My main problem with a second referendum is that I have yet to meet anyone on either side who would vote any differently. There are a number of younger people who would vote in this one but I'm not sure that there'd be enough to tip the balance. it would remain very close and not resolve the situation in the long term.

    No Deal though would likely shift the balance to Remain
    The only way the matter would be settled properly by another referendum if there was a significant win for one side or the other. I'd go for 60/40 and in order to win by that margin the pro-EU side would have to win another 4000000 votes or so. I can't see even the no-deal scenario making that much of a difference
    No Deal takes it to 55% Remain 45% Leave ie the same margin as the 2014 indyref vote according to YouGov

    http://uk.businessinsider.com/yougov-poll-voters-would-rather-remain-in-eu-than-accept-a-no-deal-brexit-2018-7
    That's not a comparison which inspires confidence of it being over following a second reference.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 8,621
    Scott_P said:
    That is a tiny fraction of the march. Doesn't do it justice.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,777
    Barnesian said:

    Scott_P said:
    That is a tiny fraction of the march. Doesn't do it justice.
    That's more than the Trump inauguration.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    Barnesian said:

    Scott_P said:
    That is a tiny fraction of the march. Doesn't do it justice.
    Yes, it is no doubt very large. And now what? I back a second vote, but do you think that because there is a large turnout for a second vote (and I have no doubt the vast majority of that turnout want to vote remain in that second vote) that if we get one Remain will win? It's been the case for awhile that more people think the vote to leave was wrong than think it was right, but do enough of those follow through in thinking it is a wrong which must be completely overturned?

    That's the thing I find tedious about marches and political rallies - it looks like people are having a jolly good time, and they get very fired up and are an admirable reflection of people getting passionate about a party or cause...but while it might end up aligning with what the people as a whole would do, the certainty that that will be the case is often unfounded.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914
    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    It was close and that was when Leavers were saying it would be easy, we hold the cards, sunlit uplands, £350m/week to NHS etc. Are you still saying those things?
    Things have changed, we don't have to cut off our nose to spite our face.
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/nobody-said-it-was-easy

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    Well they didn't have consistent leads for a period after Chequers through to around September IIRC, but it is an interesting point. OK not every pollster has the Tories with relatively comfy leads, but a lot do, and either the public are incredibly more forgiving of political dysfunction than we think, and a lot more worried about Corbyn than many of us think, or many pollsters are completely off again.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    So (at least) over 96% of those who voted Remain couldn't be bothered to turn out on this march?

    Interesting.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,299

    You can smell the fear of the Leavers.

    Gove's right, the referendum created a new/strong pro EU movement in this country, and he's right, if Brexit turns into a disaster this movement will be primed to take us back in.

    Traitor.
    You sound like Roderick Spode.

  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    It was close and that was when Leavers were saying it would be easy, we hold the cards, sunlit uplands, £350m/week to NHS etc. Are you still saying those things?
    Things have changed, we don't have to cut off our nose to spite our face.
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/nobody-said-it-was-easy

    I'm not lobbying for a second referendum, but if parliament et al legislate for one that would be absolutely fine by me.
  • Barnesian said:

    Scott_P said:
    That is a tiny fraction of the march. Doesn't do it justice.
    The reality is the number on the march is a small fraction of the number who voted Leave in London.

    Or for that matter the number of people from other EU countries who live in London.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914
    John_M said:

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    It was close and that was when Leavers were saying it would be easy, we hold the cards, sunlit uplands, £350m/week to NHS etc. Are you still saying those things?
    Things have changed, we don't have to cut off our nose to spite our face.
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/nobody-said-it-was-easy

    I'm not lobbying for a second referendum, but if parliament et al legislate for one that would be absolutely fine by me.
    If TMay's deal gets voted down, what other option would there be?
    No Deal or New Referendum.
    Are there any Brexiteers (Wrexiteers) who campaigned for No Deal?
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.

    Just two hours ago, Charles of this parish was speculating it would be “less than 20,000”.

    What a muppet.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,777
    March now leading on BBC news website front.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    So (at least) over 96% of those who voted Remain couldn't be bothered to turn out on this march?

    Interesting.
    Weird comment - can you imagine an extra 16 million people in London this afternoon.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,819

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    So (at least) over 96% of those who voted Remain couldn't be bothered to turn out on this march?

    Interesting.
    That has to be one of the most ridiculous statements made.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    John_M said:

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    It was close and that was when Leavers were saying it would be easy, we hold the cards, sunlit uplands, £350m/week to NHS etc. Are you still saying those things?
    Things have changed, we don't have to cut off our nose to spite our face.
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/nobody-said-it-was-easy

    I'm not lobbying for a second referendum, but if parliament et al legislate for one that would be absolutely fine by me.
    If TMay's deal gets voted down, what other option would there be?
    No Deal or New Referendum.
    Are there any Brexiteers (Wrexiteers) who campaigned for No Deal?
    I enjoy a good Internet argument as much as the next anonymous person, but this is an area where I fear to tread. May has proven to be completely unpredictable. I mean, yes, predictably shit and underperforming even my worst fears, but who knows what she'll do? She's notoriously secretive and non-collegiate.

    My guess, and it's of the wild-ass variety is that whatever sack of shit May brings before parliament will be voted through. But there are any number of cups 'twixt lip and sip here, and my honest view is, I don't know what will happen, second referendum or no.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    edited October 2018

    Mr. HYUFD, I maintain the best hope for Remain is a terrible May deal. That'll depress in both senses Leave voters.

    No deal will worry some a lot, but for others they'll be glad of the opportunity to leave. May's capitulation would be worse than either staying or leaving.

    Of course, we'll never know which one of us is right, but that's what I think.

    And, if there is to be another vote, it must be next year. Any later than that, and my bet won't come off.

    If there is a May Deal, any deal ie on the NI backstop leading ultimately to a FTA for GB then Brexit is safe in my view.

    If No Deal Remain have a real chance of reversing Brexit in EUref2 early next year.

    We shall see anyway
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,777
    kjh said:

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    So (at least) over 96% of those who voted Remain couldn't be bothered to turn out on this march?

    Interesting.
    That has to be one of the most ridiculous statements made.
    Isn't there some ratio that pol scientists use? For every x marcher there are y at home who agree.

  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    If you make rough and ready assumptions that people are marching 25 abreast and a yard apart, that’s 44,000 people per marching mile. It shouldn’t be too difficult for someone monitoring the start or finish points to calculate how many miles of people passed through.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    Every time there is a rally on anything - left or right - people whine that rallies don’t count.

    It’s incredibly tedious.

    The point is is that upwards of half a million feel passionately enough about the clusterfuck that is Brexit to get of their arse and protest about it.
  • If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    It could be going better and it could be going a lot worse.

    We haven't had that recession or the refugee camps at Dover so confidently predicted by Remainers.

    The reality is that we tend to do mediocrity in this country and where the government is involved lots of posturing and inattention to detail.

    That was the situation before the Referendum, would have been the situation if Remain had won and will continue to be the situation however the future plays out.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    kjh said:

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    So (at least) over 96% of those who voted Remain couldn't be bothered to turn out on this march?

    Interesting.
    That has to be one of the most ridiculous statements made.
    Why is that? The whole commentary about marches are ridiculous - by their nature while they can be big there is no guarantee they are representative of opinion 300k, 500k, 800k, 1million, all would be impressive numbers and worthy of praise, but neither number is any more of a guarantee that it is reflective of opinion. Indeed, at least on this issue the demand is for a vote to check if the people actually do want to do something rather thank blanket claiming for certain that the people want to remain (though I expect a few speakers will say that). But a large march just indicates a lot of people care about something. There is nothing particularly ridiculous is countering that many many many more did not care enough to march. It doesn't invalidate a march, but it is true nonetheless.

    And personally I'm annoyed that a second referendum is clearly, for many, just a proxy for wanting to remain. If it is actually about confirming things it would be nice it things were more welcoming of deal supporters or even no dealers who want to extra confirm they are happy to go (though granted the latter are likely a smaller grouping).
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914
    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    I can't find any aerial views of the pro-Brexit rally in Harrogate this afternoon.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    What’s incredible actually is that the “People’s Vote” campaign is totally insipid and smug. It’s probably turned as many off as on.

    Even I as a die-hard Remainer can see this.

    And yet still they come out to march, potentially in numbers not seen since the Iraq War.
  • Suspect if no deal is orchestrated by the ERG / DUP (and this becomes the obvious outcome) then remain will start shifting materially vs. leave in opinion polls.

    And the pressure for another referendum will be become significant.

    Ironic if the ERG help to cause this....
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177

    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    Every time there is a rally on anything - left or right - people whine that rallies don’t count.

    It’s incredibly tedious.

    The point is is that upwards of half a million feel passionately enough about the clusterfuck that is Brexit to get of their arse and protest about it.
    Yes, and that's nice, but it doesn't make the tediousness of the script any less tedious, and as you point out it is not a left or right thing, depending on the issue the same script will be used by either side. The politicians at least might as well take the day off, set an auto reply with their talking points no matter the crowd size, and then wait until parliament is back and vote the way they will vote.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    kle4 said:

    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    Every time there is a rally on anything - left or right - people whine that rallies don’t count.

    It’s incredibly tedious.

    The point is is that upwards of half a million feel passionately enough about the clusterfuck that is Brexit to get of their arse and protest about it.
    Yes, and that's nice, but it doesn't make the tediousness of the script any less tedious, and as you point out it is not a left or right thing, depending on the issue the same script will be used by either side. The politicians at least might as well take the day off, set an auto reply with their talking points no matter the crowd size, and then wait until parliament is back and vote the way they will vote.
    I like that people are marching. It's healthy, no matter what the cause, even if it's one I disagree with. I hope we'd all agree that it's more significant than yet another #twitterstorm.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177

    Suspect if no deal is orchestrated by the ERG / DUP (and this becomes the obvious outcome) then remain will start shifting materially vs. leave in opinion polls.

    And the pressure for another referendum will be become significant.

    Ironic if the ERG help to cause this....

    I think the ERG have played a big role in aiding the Remain cause.

    But that is not actually entirely unreasonable. If they think the wrong type of Brexit is so bad then they should oppose it, even if that risks remaining and bringing down the government. Similarly if people genuinely think no deal is apocalyptic then they should be much more open to backing even a crappy deal, even if that ensures the survival of the government (for now).
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177

    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    I can't find any aerial views of the pro-Brexit rally in Harrogate this afternoon.
    And? What's that got to do with the arguments that are happening are incredibly stock?

    Plus while the crowd is I am sure very anti-Brexit it is not the case that everyone who wants a second vote would back remain.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    What’s incredible actually is that the “People’s Vote” campaign is totally insipid and smug. It’s probably turned as many off as on.

    Even I as a die-hard Remainer can see this.

    And yet still they come out to march, potentially in numbers not seen since the Iraq War.

    It’s a proxy for the emotional reaction to the hopelessness of Brexit. If Brexit weren’t so bad that its execution was being disowned by everyone, it would be received with sullen acquiescence by even ardent Remain supporters. But as it is they feel obliged to demonstrate their hostility.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    edited October 2018

    What’s incredible actually is that the “People’s Vote” campaign is totally insipid and smug. It’s probably turned as many off as on.

    Even I as a die-hard Remainer can see this.

    And yet still they come out to march, potentially in numbers not seen since the Iraq War.

    Apart from anything else, it's such a stupid name. Insofar as it echoes anything, it echoes Blair, the most elitist, lazy and ineffectual prime minister of the twentieth century. In other words, a key turnoff for those groups it should be trying to attract to its standard.
    kle4 said:

    Well they didn't have consistent leads for a period after Chequers through to around September IIRC, but it is an interesting point. OK not every pollster has the Tories with relatively comfy leads, but a lot do, and either the public are incredibly more forgiving of political dysfunction than we think, and a lot more worried about Corbyn than many of us think, or many pollsters are completely off again.
    Or all of the above, of course.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    edited October 2018
    John_M said:

    kle4 said:

    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    Every time there is a rally on anything - left or right - people whine that rallies don’t count.

    It’s incredibly tedious.

    The point is is that upwards of half a million feel passionately enough about the clusterfuck that is Brexit to get of their arse and protest about it.
    Yes, and that's nice, but it doesn't make the tediousness of the script any less tedious, and as you point out it is not a left or right thing, depending on the issue the same script will be used by either side. The politicians at least might as well take the day off, set an auto reply with their talking points no matter the crowd size, and then wait until parliament is back and vote the way they will vote.
    I like that people are marching. It's healthy, no matter what the cause, even if it's one I disagree with. I hope we'd all agree that it's more significant than yet another #twitterstorm.
    I like that people care enough to march. I don't even think it is pointless in this instance, because the parliamentary arithmetic and political wrangling going on means the path ahead is very uncertain and a show of strength for some option can be compelling. I just don't think it is as significant an event as organisers of this type of thing always claim, even if it is not as meaningless as opponents will claim, because ultimately the problem is numbers in parliament for any particular option, and if that is resolved (which is not certain by any means) then like other marches it will get ignored.
  • shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672
    Bloke in the picture centre seems particularly repellent. Socks with his sandals?
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914
    kle4 said:

    kle4 said:

    I see we are now wibbling about whether whether the rally has attracted over half a million or not.
    .

    I see a lot more people querying whether the actual size matters or not than those wibbling about the size. The script for this day was written months ago.
    I can't find any aerial views of the pro-Brexit rally in Harrogate this afternoon.
    And? What's that got to do with the arguments that are happening are incredibly stock?

    Plus while the crowd is I am sure very anti-Brexit it is not the case that everyone who wants a second vote would back remain.
    I suppose some would back 'No Deal', but very few people have a good word to say for it.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    shiney2 said:

    Bloke in the picture centre seems particularly repellent. Socks with his sandals?

    LD uniform I suspect.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    I believe the rule of thumb is to halve the organisers and double the police estimate

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12879582
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    Because May has poor judgement and the team has handled negotiations appallingly badly from the beginning

  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    Charles said:

    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    Because May has poor judgement and the team has handled negotiations appallingly badly from the beginning
    They are one and the same thing. appointing David Davis was always a mistake
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Charles said:

    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    Because May has poor judgement and the team has handled negotiations appallingly badly from the beginning

    As always, it’s never Leavers’ fault.

    The seeds of the current debacle were sown in the referendum campaign that Leavers happily fell in behind. Winning with xenophobic lies was the catastrophe. The detail might have been finessed better but the trap was sprung then.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    kle4 said:

    I'm guessing the bar for perceived success in the turnout estimation would be to exceed that of the countryside march.

    Except that only 8% of the population live in the countryside

    To be comparable you’d need to be 10x as large,,,
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,746
    Charles said:

    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    Because May has poor judgement and the team has handled negotiations appallingly badly from the beginning

    Are we doing a post mortem already?
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    Charles said:

    If Brexit were going better there wouldn’t be a big turnout for such marches. Leavers could usefully reflect on why Brexit has become such a fiasco.

    Because May has poor judgement and the team has handled negotiations appallingly badly from the beginning

    “Forward, the Light Brigade!”
    Was there a man dismayed?
    Not though the soldier knew
    Someone had blundered.
    Theirs not to make reply,
    Theirs not to reason why,
    Theirs but to do and die.
    Into the valley of Death
    Rode the six hundred.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Walker, saw a bit of Gina Miller being interviewed on Sky News. She did a good job, and a more matter-of-fact approach would have more success than the 'quivering little British bodies' and 'don't top yourself' nonsense.

    That said, there's some weakness in ContinuityRemain caused by the refusal of some to accept the result almost from the first day.

    Mr. Charles, quite. I still fully expect a rancid capitulation by May.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,819

    kjh said:

    RoyalBlue said:

    HYUFD said:

    People's Vote campaign claiming 570,000 marching today which would overtake the 400,000 who attended the Countryside March and be the second biggest March in postwar UK history I think after the anti Iraq War March
    https://twitter.com/peoplesvote_uk/status/1053628358536429568?s=20

    Bollocks.
    What do you put the number on?
    It will be somewhere north of 100k and beneath 500k. And it doesn't matter. It's not representative.

    A big march but very far from the biggest ever.
    The size of the march is unimportant. Britain is not an absolute monarchy or dictatorship in which the rulers can only gauge the mood of the people by what they do in the street.

    We had a referendum, and the people voted to leave. That trumps any protest.
    So (at least) over 96% of those who voted Remain couldn't be bothered to turn out on this march?

    Interesting.
    That has to be one of the most ridiculous statements made.
    Isn't there some ratio that pol scientists use? For every x marcher there are y at home who agree.

    That is logical
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,705
    RoyalBlue said:

    Reading through the comments here today, I realise that *nothing* brings out the self-pitying whining of right wingers more than a mass protest.

    In a liberal democracy with freedom of the press that has had a referendum on the issue in hand, a mass protest is the definition of self-pitying whining.

    Today’s march will not change anyone’s mind. All it will do is consolidate existing views on both sides.
    You'd prefer a liberal democracy with no right to protest?
This discussion has been closed.