Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » When some men want to be humiliated and embarrassed they hire

24567

Comments

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    edited August 2018
    Moeen Ali and Sam Curran are really showing up the top five here. Conditions are far worse and yet they've scored more runs each than the supposed batsmen added together. If I were Keaton Jennings I would take this decision away from Ed Smith, and if I were Joe Root I would be writing a letter of resignation.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,044

    Could Kate Hoey follow suit?

    Wouldn't she defect to the DUP?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Rentool, because at some point Labour MPs (and members) need to decide whether they want Corbyn to be PM or not. Bleating about anti-semitism is all well and good, but those MPs who line up behind Corbyn, even if they grumble, come the next General Election will be campaigning to make him Prime Minister.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,159
    edited August 2018
    notme said:

    We'll see if anyone else joins Frank Fields. Kudos to him for resigning.

    hasnt his local party go infested with corbynites threatening de selection? FF is one of the very few who could possibly pull of as an independent. Though it would be difficult.
    And now every labour mp each time they appear in the media are going to be askew

    'Do you agree with Frank Field's resignation over anti semitism'

    What a descent into turmoil by a once noble party

    And Frank Field was a credit to labour that Corbyn and his cabal can only dream about
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    edited August 2018

    Very sad that a life-long Labourite feels the need to leave the party.

    Much sadder that others don't feel the need to.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840

    https://twitter.com/TimesCorbyn/status/990698081149743106

    We may be dealing with an apartheid regime with despicable views but come on Jeremy protesting outside their embassy just isn't cricket old sport...

    Edit: interesting thread Richard.

    I do admire your stoical defence of Corbyn but nothing you can do now will change the narrative on Corbyn and anti semetic views and this will follow him for as long as he leads the labour party including a GE campaign.

    Who would have thought that virtually all the summer holidays would be dominated with Corbyn's anti semetic issues giving the government a free pass. Labour's lost summer
    The problem with the racism scandals in both parties is the voters either don't care, think the other party is worse or think the other party is just as bad or just disbelieve it.

    With Parliament coming back soon the newspapers will have to actually get back to reporting on the government more regularly, which is probably good for Labour.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,677

    Jonathan said:

    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2018/08/jeremy-corbyn-s-two-universes

    Thought this was quite interesting, not about right or wrong just a reflection on the two different universes (as he puts it) of Corbyn.

    I am more interested in a politician that talks to the second universe of normal people...


    The solution has been obvious for some time. Corbyn needs a partner from the right of the party capable of dealing with press.

    Corbyns error, which will keep him out of office, is that he is unable to work with or motivate people who do not fully agree with him.

    Blair worked with and promoted left wingers.
    It is unfortunate that Corbyn just packed his cabinet and front bench with people who agreed with him and never gave anyone else a chance...

    I don't think the messenger would help much if Corbyn was still leader, he could be a bit smoother with the media but considering how they have been with him I don't expect or perhaps even want him to treat them any differently to how they treat him. I think the problem would largely remain regardless of having someone smooth from the right of the party to deal with the press. They would still really go for Corbyn.

    Abandon the idea of good press and go straight to the voters, the tv rules kick in around election time so there is no choice for the TV coverage but to attempt to show balance and that is when we have the opportunity to get our message across.
    That doesn't work. There are 80000 voters in each constituency. If you want to speak to half of them each year, you need to reach over 100 a day. You need mass media.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
  • I see the cult are already piling on. Dodgy Doctor (Eoin Clarke) blaming Frank Field for all the poverty that exists in society today.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    Mr. Rentool, because at some point Labour MPs (and members) need to decide whether they want Corbyn to be PM or not. Bleating about anti-semitism is all well and good, but those MPs who line up behind Corbyn, even if they grumble, come the next General Election will be campaigning to make him Prime Minister.

    Why did Frank Field nominate Corbyn for a shot at the leadership then ?

    He has known him for years Hardly kudos more like thick as pig shit.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Mr. Rentool, because at some point Labour MPs (and members) need to decide whether they want Corbyn to be PM or not. Bleating about anti-semitism is all well and good, but those MPs who line up behind Corbyn, even if they grumble, come the next General Election will be campaigning to make him Prime Minister.

    What Labour members and MPs opposed to Jeremy Corbyn need to decide is whether it is more important to oppose Jeremy Corbyn or to have a Labour government. It's pretty clear that the option of both is not going to be available unless he chooses to step down voluntarily.

    There is an interesting parallel that I might have drawn attention to in the past. Leave advocates and supporters needed to decide whether it was more important to oppose xenophobic lies or to get Britain to leave the EU. Sadly they by and large decided that the xenophobic lies could be tolerated.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. City, I agree. Nominating Corbyn, whether it was Field, Khan, Beckett, or one of the many others, was incredibly stupid.

    That doesn't make his resignation wrong, however. The bad does not wash away the good.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,158
    edited August 2018
    Yorkcity said:

    Mr. Rentool, because at some point Labour MPs (and members) need to decide whether they want Corbyn to be PM or not. Bleating about anti-semitism is all well and good, but those MPs who line up behind Corbyn, even if they grumble, come the next General Election will be campaigning to make him Prime Minister.

    Why did Frank Field nominate Corbyn for a shot at the leadership then ?

    He has known him for years Hardly kudos more like thick as pig shit.
    I believe his stated reason was that all the other candidates were centrists and he believed that having a left wing voice in the contest was essential to get a range of views even though he didn't want Corbyn to win.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,044

    Mr. Rentool, because at some point Labour MPs (and members) need to decide whether they want Corbyn to be PM or not. Bleating about anti-semitism is all well and good, but those MPs who line up behind Corbyn, even if they grumble, come the next General Election will be campaigning to make him Prime Minister.

    Corbyn or a Tory as PM, I choose Corbyn.

    We aren't electing an all-powerful President, we are electing a parliament. There will be natural checks and balances from within the PLP and other parties a minority Labour government would have to rely on. We'll have a Socialist government, not a Marxist one.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    edited August 2018



    https://twitter.com/TimesCorbyn/status/990698081149743106

    We may be dealing with an apartheid regime with despicable views but come on Jeremy protesting outside their embassy just isn't cricket old sport...

    Edit: interesting thread Richard.

    I do admire your stoical defence of Corbyn but nothing you can do now will change the narrative on Corbyn and anti semetic views and this will follow him for as long as he leads the labour party including a GE campaign.

    Who would have thought that virtually all the summer holidays would be dominated with Corbyn's anti semetic issues giving the government a free pass. Labour's lost summer
    The problem with the racism scandals in both parties is the voters either don't care, think the other party is worse or think the other party is just as bad or just disbelieve it.

    With Parliament coming back soon the newspapers will have to actually get back to reporting on the government more regularly, which is probably good for Labour.
    One slight amendment. You are broadly right but in Labour's case it is the leader of the Party. That makes a big difference (cf Tim Farron).
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Clearly I put the mockers on Moeen.

    But considering he was dropped for his wretched batting form, that 40 made under floodlights should be an abject humiliation to the top six especially the idiot who for the second test running made a dumb decision after winning he toss.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    Jonathan said:

    Cricket or politics. Which is most depressing?

    Tough call, isn't it?
  • Veteran Labour MP Frank Field has quit the party's group in Parliament, saying the leadership has become "a force for anti-Semitism in British politics". The Birkenhead MP also blamed a "culture of intolerance, nastiness and intimidation" in local parties.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45359009

    Not mincing his words.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    ydoethur said:

    Moeen Ali and Sam Curran are really showing up the top five here. Conditions are far worse and yet they've scored more runs each than the supposed batsmen added together. If I were Keaton Jennings I would take this decision away from Ed Smith, and if I were Joe Root I would be writing a letter of resignation.

    I get serious grief for posts like that when a wicket falls.


  • https://twitter.com/TimesCorbyn/status/990698081149743106

    We may be dealing with an apartheid regime with despicable views but come on Jeremy protesting outside their embassy just isn't cricket old sport...

    Edit: interesting thread Richard.

    I do admire your stoical defence of Corbyn but nothing you can do now will change the narrative on Corbyn and anti semetic views and this will follow him for as long as he leads the labour party including a GE campaign.

    Who would have thought that virtually all the summer holidays would be dominated with Corbyn's anti semetic issues giving the government a free pass. Labour's lost summer
    The problem with the racism scandals in both parties is the voters either don't care, think the other party is worse or think the other party is just as bad or just disbelieve it.

    With Parliament coming back soon the newspapers will have to actually get back to reporting on the government more regularly, which is probably good for Labour.
    You are very blinkered and trying to move the goal posts by including both parties when you haven't got a foot to stand on

    Labour under Corbyn are a disgrace to our Country and I simply cannot comprehend how anyone can knock on doors asking for him to become PM.

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Rentool, then I fear you choose wrong, letting the red rosette eclipse the idiocy, misjudgements, and even worse vices of Corbyn.

    A PM is not all-powerful but there is plenty of decision-making that does not require Parliamentary approval, including the disposition of the armed forces.

    I hope we never have to discover whether you or I am right about this, because I'm quite confident I would be, and the consequences for the country would be appalling. [I'd also quite like to have a genuine dilemma over who to vote for, and if Labour had a leader who didn't describe Hamas as his friends or pray at the grave of terrorists, I might just have to consider whether to vote blue or red next time].
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I have to say that's a very muddled resignation letter.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    edited August 2018
    TOPPING said:



    https://twitter.com/TimesCorbyn/status/990698081149743106

    We may be dealing with an apartheid regime with despicable views but come on Jeremy protesting outside their embassy just isn't cricket old sport...

    Edit: interesting thread Richard.

    I do admire your stoical defence of Corbyn but nothing you can do now will change the narrative on Corbyn and anti semetic views and this will follow him for as long as he leads the labour party including a GE campaign.

    Who would have thought that virtually all the summer holidays would be dominated with Corbyn's anti semetic issues giving the government a free pass. Labour's lost summer
    The problem with the racism scandals in both parties is the voters either don't care, think the other party is worse or think the other party is just as bad or just disbelieve it.

    With Parliament coming back soon the newspapers will have to actually get back to reporting on the government more regularly, which is probably good for Labour.
    One slight amendment. You are broadly right but in Labour's case it is the leader of the Party. That makes a big difference (cf Tim Farron).
    Is this a reference to the hostile environment policy towards the windrush generation and the citizens of nowhere comment?

    She was merely a prominent Conservative who didn't speak out during the london mayoral campaign so I guess she can only be partially blamed there.

    Good point.

    Edit: Not seeing a rush to discipline Boris for his recent comments either...
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    That’s a good call. The batsmen have totally and utterly failed to perform in this series, there’s no reason they should keep their places except that they feel entitled to them. If we lose this Test the selectors need to do something radical next week.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,220
    Not to sound like a Lib Dem Tory apologist for Corbyn but are we sure Field's resignation isn't more to do with his probable deselection by the europhiles than Corbyn ?
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821

    I have to say that's a very muddled resignation letter.

    Yes, I thought that. It starts off well enough but then goes off into a strange rant about one very minor figure.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    F1: Twitter reckons Kvyat might be in with a shot of returning, with a seat at Toro Rosso.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,677

    I have to say that's a very muddled resignation letter.

    Yes, I thought that. It starts off well enough but then goes off into a strange rant about one very minor figure.
    Clever. Not so minor now.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
    Oh, and fair play to Frank Field, an honest and longstanding public servant who’s given his life to the Labour Party. Hopefully the next few weeks will see more sensible Labour MPs also resign the whip.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840



    https://twitter.com/TimesCorbyn/status/990698081149743106

    We may be dealing with an apartheid regime with despicable views but come on Jeremy protesting outside their embassy just isn't cricket old sport...

    Edit: interesting thread Richard.

    I do admire your stoical defence of Corbyn but nothing you can do now will change the narrative on Corbyn and anti semetic views and this will follow him for as long as he leads the labour party including a GE campaign.

    Who would have thought that virtually all the summer holidays would be dominated with Corbyn's anti semetic issues giving the government a free pass. Labour's lost summer
    The problem with the racism scandals in both parties is the voters either don't care, think the other party is worse or think the other party is just as bad or just disbelieve it.

    With Parliament coming back soon the newspapers will have to actually get back to reporting on the government more regularly, which is probably good for Labour.
    You are very blinkered and trying to move the goal posts by including both parties when you haven't got a foot to stand on

    Labour under Corbyn are a disgrace to our Country and I simply cannot comprehend how anyone can knock on doors asking for him to become PM.

    With the greatest of respect you have rose tinted glasses towards the Conservative party and the opposite towards the Labour party. Whilst you may see the current Labour party as racist and the current Conservative one as not many people have the exact opposite view, many people wonder how people can knock doors and vote for the Conservatives.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,301
    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    But who is Bell making his runs against ? (hint, most of them against the bottom of the second division...)
    He's a plausible short term expedient, but no more than that.

    England's problem is, of course, at 1,2 and 3.

    It's not as though we haven't tried a large number of options as openers; all have failed, and Cook is done.
    We don't have a number three at all (Root should be batting at four where he belongs - and though I agree he shouldn't be captain, there is no obvious replacement, though Woakes and Buttler are possibilities).

    We have a fine middle order and decent bowling options. And no solutions at the top of the order.
  • Sandpit said:

    Oh, and fair play to Frank Field, an honest and longstanding public servant who’s given his life to the Labour Party. Hopefully the next few weeks will see more sensible Labour MPs also resign the whip.

    If only the likes of Chuka and Kinnock Jnr had any backbone.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    One practical point: Frank Field chairs the DWP Select Committee. Will he have to give that up now?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Urquhart, have to wait and see if others follow suit. It's just broken, after all.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    Mr. City, I agree. Nominating Corbyn, whether it was Field, Khan, Beckett, or one of the many others, was incredibly stupid.

    That doesn't make his resignation wrong, however. The bad does not wash away the good.

    Very true.
    They initially caused this mess and they were aware of his past , and suitability to lead the Labour Party.



  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821

    One practical point: Frank Field chairs the DWP Select Committee. Will he have to give that up now?

    I don't imagine so.
  • A council finance manager has admitted defrauding £60,000 from the Grenfell Fire victim fund in the latest shocking fraud case linked to the disaster.

    Jenny McDonagh, 39, stole cash meant for survivors of the west London tragedy, spending it on holidays to Dubai and Los Angeles, as well as expensive dinners out, designer hairstyles and online gambling.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6113131/Grenfell-council-worker-helped-money-meant-victims-charged-fraud.html
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    One practical point: Frank Field chairs the DWP Select Committee. Will he have to give that up now?

    yes
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    I was thinking about pointing out that he was likely to be deselected and perhaps jumped before he was pushed but I decided to leave it.

    We are a similar age, I have the baby face thing going on as well although to a lesser extent and the politics but I think we pretty much separate at that point.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,301
    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    Moeen Ali and Sam Curran are really showing up the top five here. Conditions are far worse and yet they've scored more runs each than the supposed batsmen added together. If I were Keaton Jennings I would take this decision away from Ed Smith, and if I were Joe Root I would be writing a letter of resignation.

    I get serious grief for posts like that when a wicket falls.
    I think we've passed beyond grief....
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    But who is Bell making his runs against ? (hint, most of them against the bottom of the second division...)
    He's a plausible short term expedient, but no more than that.

    England's problem is, of course, at 1,2 and 3.

    It's not as though we haven't tried a large number of options as openers; all have failed, and Cook is done.
    We don't have a number three at all (Root should be batting at four where he belongs - and though I agree he shouldn't be captain, there is no obvious replacement, though Woakes and Buttler are possibilities).

    We have a fine middle order and decent bowling options. And no solutions at the top of the order.
    There are plenty of good bowling attacks in Division Two. No bowling attack containing Michael Hogan and Graham Wagg can be considered a pushover.

    There is a serious shortage of good batsmen, especially in the clubs at the bottom end.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,044

    Mr. Rentool, then I fear you choose wrong, letting the red rosette eclipse the idiocy, misjudgements, and even worse vices of Corbyn.

    A PM is not all-powerful but there is plenty of decision-making that does not require Parliamentary approval, including the disposition of the armed forces.

    I hope we never have to discover whether you or I am right about this, because I'm quite confident I would be, and the consequences for the country would be appalling. [I'd also quite like to have a genuine dilemma over who to vote for, and if Labour had a leader who didn't describe Hamas as his friends or pray at the grave of terrorists, I might just have to consider whether to vote blue or red next time].

    Come off it MD, you're as Tory as they come.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Scott_P said:

    One practical point: Frank Field chairs the DWP Select Committee. Will he have to give that up now?

    yes
    Why? Surely the rule is it is an opposition MP who chairs it. Unless he's planning something really drastic he still fulfills that criteria.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    ydoethur said:

    Why? Surely the rule is it is an opposition MP who chairs it. Unless he's planning something really drastic he still fulfills that criteria.

    Allocated on Party lines. Labour are now 1 short
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    At least England are slightly less abject with the bat than Nottinghamshire.

    Admittedly this is like saying someone is less crazy than Chris Williamson, but let's take the positives here.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Unconventional reaction from the party deputy leader to the resignation of one of his party's MPs:

    https://twitter.com/hzeffman/status/1035192373461045248
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,301
    I don't really approve of psychoanalysing politicians, but this one is a doozy:
    https://slate.com/technology/2018/08/no-matter-how-bad-it-gets-trump-will-never-give-up.html?

    And in that context...
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45358883


  • https://twitter.com/TimesCorbyn/status/990698081149743106

    We may be dealing with an apartheid regime with despicable views but come on Jeremy protesting outside their embassy just isn't cricket old sport...

    Edit: interesting thread Richard.

    I do admire your stoical defence of Corbyn but nothing you can do now will change the narrative on Corbyn and anti semetic views and this will follow him for as long as he leads the labour party including a GE campaign.

    Who would have thought that virtually all the summer holidays would be dominated with Corbyn's anti semetic issues giving the government a free pass. Labour's lost summer
    The problem with the racism scandals in both parties is the voters either don't care, think the other party is worse or think the other party is just as bad or just disbelieve it.

    With Parliament coming back soon the newspapers will have to actually get back to reporting on the government more regularly, which is probably good for Labour.
    You are very blinkered and trying to move the goal posts by including both parties when you haven't got a foot to stand on

    Labour under Corbyn are a disgrace to our Country and I simply cannot comprehend how anyone can knock on doors asking for him to become PM.

    With the greatest of respect you have rose tinted glasses towards the Conservative party and the opposite towards the Labour party. Whilst you may see the current Labour party as racist and the current Conservative one as not many people have the exact opposite view, many people wonder how people can knock doors and vote for the Conservatives.
    I see Corbyn as a real threat to this Country with his views and as long as he leads labour the party will continue to plumb the depths. Labour need to rid themselves of him and install someone like Thornberry
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Rentool, I've voted for at least five different parties at various elections. Two at General Elections. I'm rather disheartened by the current state of the blues, but the reds are led by a complete imbecile, with a habit of siding with this nation's enemies.

    In a May versus (say) Cooper contest, I'd need to weigh things up.

    In an Anyone Else versus Corbyn contest, Anyone Else has my vote.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    Scott_P said:

    ydoethur said:

    Why? Surely the rule is it is an opposition MP who chairs it. Unless he's planning something really drastic he still fulfills that criteria.

    Allocated on Party lines. Labour are now 1 short
    Allocated, yes, but does that not apply only at the time that they are appointed?

    I don't know for sure, but I thought so. I might be wrong though.
  • So much for Nick P's strategy of keeping quiet about antisemitism. Every time the story looks like it might die down, something comes up to push it back up the news agenda.

    The fact that Corbyn can't kill this row suggests that if he becomes PM and has to deal with a crisis, it won't go very well.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631

    A council finance manager has admitted defrauding £60,000 from the Grenfell Fire victim fund in the latest shocking fraud case linked to the disaster.

    Jenny McDonagh, 39, stole cash meant for survivors of the west London tragedy, spending it on holidays to Dubai and Los Angeles, as well as expensive dinners out, designer hairstyles and online gambling.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6113131/Grenfell-council-worker-helped-money-meant-victims-charged-fraud.html

    If ever there was a case for imposing an exemplary sentence on someone. 10 years?
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    So the only two Labour MPs to quit so far are one who was facing a sexual misconduct investigation, and one who had been deselected.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Sandpit said:

    A council finance manager has admitted defrauding £60,000 from the Grenfell Fire victim fund in the latest shocking fraud case linked to the disaster.

    Jenny McDonagh, 39, stole cash meant for survivors of the west London tragedy, spending it on holidays to Dubai and Los Angeles, as well as expensive dinners out, designer hairstyles and online gambling.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6113131/Grenfell-council-worker-helped-money-meant-victims-charged-fraud.html

    If ever there was a case for imposing an exemplary sentence on someone. 10 years?
    If we wanted to make the punishment fit the crime, she should work as unpaid secretary to Emma Dent Coad for five years.

    That'll learn her not to touch things that don't belong to her.
  • So much for Nick P's strategy of keeping quiet about antisemitism. Every time the story looks like it might die down, something comes up to push it back up the news agenda.

    The fact that Corbyn can't kill this row suggests that if he becomes PM and has to deal with a crisis, it won't go very well.

    I do not think that was ever in doubt
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091


    In a May versus (say) Cooper contest, I'd need to weigh things up.

    LOL, stop being disingenuous. You claimed even Ed Miliband was too "bonkers" and near-Marxist.
  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092

    So much for Nick P's strategy of keeping quiet about antisemitism. Every time the story looks like it might die down, something comes up to push it back up the news agenda.

    The fact that Corbyn can't kill this row suggests that if he becomes PM and has to deal with a crisis, it won't go very well.

    These things aren't organically "coming up", they're deliberately being put on the news agenda. The wreath story is a rerun, it was a story during the 2017 election. The public ignored it.
  • Forget Dave on his push bike and the car behind carrying his red box....

    Imran Khan mocked for helicopter home-to-work commute

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-45356096
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    Danny565 said:

    So the only two Labour MPs to quit so far are one who was facing a sexual misconduct investigation, and one who had been deselected.

    It is almost as if they didn't quit to take a brave principled stand on anti-Semitism....
  • Like I said in the previous thread, nothing will happen... watch this turn into a mass of whip resignations just to make me look foolish...
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,728
    Danny565 said:

    So the only two Labour MPs to quit so far are one who was facing a sexual misconduct investigation, and one who had been deselected.

    Point of order: isn't it that he had been threatened with deselection?

    In which case, the path to absolute power within the Labour Party is clear for Momentum ...
  • surbysurby Posts: 1,227

    But one thing is clear. Salmond, innocent or guilty, is signalling his power in a way I find deeply worrying. The message being sent out to women is that if you make accusations you will be up against enormous power and wealth....
    ......massive donations to crowdfunders send the same old signal to us: what happens to women is always less important than the reputation of “great” men.


    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/30/alex-salmond-crowdfunding-scottish-independence?CMP=share_btn_tw

    And, what if he is innocent ?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,220
    Perhaps the answer is to clone Sam Curran 5 times ?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    Pulpstar said:

    Perhaps the answer is to clone Sam Curran 5 times ?

    Top scorer again today. Just embarrassing.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Allocated, yes, but does that not apply only at the time that they are appointed?

    I don't know for sure, but I thought so. I might be wrong though.

    You might be right though...

    https://twitter.com/hzeffman/status/1035195615947497473
  • Hide away all those who excuse Corbyn, the media reporting of Frank Fields resignation is going to be explosive
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,677

    Danny565 said:

    So the only two Labour MPs to quit so far are one who was facing a sexual misconduct investigation, and one who had been deselected.

    It is almost as if they didn't quit to take a brave principled stand on anti-Semitism....
    You're better than that. Something is wrong if FF cannot sit comfortably in the Labour party. Whether that is the mob in the CLP or anti-Semitism.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,301
    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    But who is Bell making his runs against ? (hint, most of them against the bottom of the second division...)
    He's a plausible short term expedient, but no more than that.

    England's problem is, of course, at 1,2 and 3.

    It's not as though we haven't tried a large number of options as openers; all have failed, and Cook is done.
    We don't have a number three at all (Root should be batting at four where he belongs - and though I agree he shouldn't be captain, there is no obvious replacement, though Woakes and Buttler are possibilities).

    We have a fine middle order and decent bowling options. And no solutions at the top of the order.
    There are plenty of good bowling attacks in Division Two...
    But he hasn't been making the heavy runs against all of them... and has been out cheaply in recent FC innings.
    But as I said, he a plausible short term expedient.

    Who do we have as a real prospect at three ?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631
    edited August 2018
    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    A council finance manager has admitted defrauding £60,000 from the Grenfell Fire victim fund in the latest shocking fraud case linked to the disaster.

    Jenny McDonagh, 39, stole cash meant for survivors of the west London tragedy, spending it on holidays to Dubai and Los Angeles, as well as expensive dinners out, designer hairstyles and online gambling.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6113131/Grenfell-council-worker-helped-money-meant-victims-charged-fraud.html

    If ever there was a case for imposing an exemplary sentence on someone. 10 years?
    If we wanted to make the punishment fit the crime, she should work as unpaid secretary to Emma Dent Coad for five years.

    That'll learn her not to touch things that don't belong to her.
    I did think of something similar, but who would trust her with anything?

    I can’t imagine that stealing government emergency relief money will go down too well with the girls inside.

    On a personal note, usually government bureaucracy that keeps money from people (welfare, housing etc) is met with harsh critism for being unfair on people. With Grenfell we got to see what happens when the government takes the opposite approach of making immediate handouts and asking questions later. At least a dozen people in prison for fraud and theft. That’s very sad to see.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,220
    ydoethur said:

    Scott_P said:

    One practical point: Frank Field chairs the DWP Select Committee. Will he have to give that up now?

    yes
    Why? Surely the rule is it is an opposition MP who chairs it. Unless he's planning something really drastic he still fulfills that criteria.
    https://twitter.com/hzeffman/status/1035195615947497473
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,728

    Like I said in the previous thread, nothing will happen... watch this turn into a mass of whip resignations just to make me look foolish...

    Frank Field is a well-known Labour MP for a backbencher, but an important question is how well he is regarded by his fellow Labour MPs.

    This may be both directly important in terms of who might join him, but also how they react to the sh*t he will receive from the Corbynite faction.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,916

    Forget Dave on his push bike and the car behind carrying his red box....

    Imran Khan mocked for helicopter home-to-work commute

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-45356096

    That seems entirely reasonable to me. Benazir Bhutto was killed due to a bombing of a vehicle she was in, and Pervez Musharraf survived a couple of attempts to blow him up when in his car.

    If you are the leader in Pakistan stay away from public roads.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,692
    Woodcock, Gapes, Field, Austin, Hodge.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW-0kbIcf1E
  • glw said:

    Forget Dave on his push bike and the car behind carrying his red box....

    Imran Khan mocked for helicopter home-to-work commute

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-45356096

    That seems entirely reasonable to me. Benazir Bhutto was killed due to a bombing of a vehicle she was in, and Pervez Musharraf survived a couple of attempts to blow him up when in his car.

    If you are the leader in Pakistan stay away from public roads.
    I think it is the claim of it being super cheap that is being mocked.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,159
    edited August 2018
    Listening to the BBC reporting they are not holding back quoting from Frank Field's letter
  • surbysurby Posts: 1,227

    Could Kate Hoey follow suit?

    I hope so. Also, Mann and Stringer.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,631

    Like I said in the previous thread, nothing will happen... watch this turn into a mass of whip resignations just to make me look foolish...

    Ha ha. Good thread by the way, there’s clearly a lot of very conflicted people in the Labour Party.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    But who is Bell making his runs against ? (hint, most of them against the bottom of the second division...)
    He's a plausible short term expedient, but no more than that.

    England's problem is, of course, at 1,2 and 3.

    It's not as though we haven't tried a large number of options as openers; all have failed, and Cook is done.
    We don't have a number three at all (Root should be batting at four where he belongs - and though I agree he shouldn't be captain, there is no obvious replacement, though Woakes and Buttler are possibilities).

    We have a fine middle order and decent bowling options. And no solutions at the top of the order.
    There are plenty of good bowling attacks in Division Two...
    But he hasn't been making the heavy runs against all of them... and has been out cheaply in recent FC innings.
    But as I said, he a plausible short term expedient.

    Who do we have as a real prospect at three ?
    That's easy. Nobody.

    In the longer term Steve Eskinazi of Middlesex may come into the equation, but he isn't making runs at all against any sort of attack. Harry Finch of Sussex looks promising, but he's still young.

    There is a reason Root is there, and before him, Vince. It's called 'a dearth of alternatives.'
  • Whether Jeremy Corbyn becomes Prime Minister or not, the far-left will make sure we suffer

    https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/whether-corbyn-becomes-prime-minister-or-not-the-far-left-will-make-sure-we-suffer-1.469009

    Some disgusting examples of the cult on twitter / blogging.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091

    Danny565 said:

    So the only two Labour MPs to quit so far are one who was facing a sexual misconduct investigation, and one who had been deselected.

    Point of order: isn't it that he had been threatened with deselection?

    In which case, the path to absolute power within the Labour Party is clear for Momentum ...
    I think you're right: he'd already had a motion of no confidence passed in him, which obviously indicates a strong likelihood of deselection, but it hadn't formally happened yet.

    I've always quite liked Field; he's always been a genuinely independently-minded MP, who doesn't just have kneejerk stances depending on what other people on his "wing" of the party thought (although people mainly focus on some his more right-wing stances, he also has sometimes criticised the Labour leadership from the left, e.g. Harriet Harman's stupid support of the government's welfare cuts). I wouldn't have voted for the motion of no confidence personally. But still, anyone who thinks this is about the principle rather than the personal is kidding themselves.
  • Listening to the BBC reporting they are not holding back quoting from Frank Field's letter

    Frank Field is one of the good guys. We want more MPs like him.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,677

    Woodcock, Gapes, Field, Austin, Hodge.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW-0kbIcf1E

    The appeal narrows down to the true believers and yet they dance. Fools.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Like I said in the previous thread, nothing will happen... watch this turn into a mass of whip resignations just to make me look foolish...

    I think you're probably safe enough. Frank Field is from the wrong Brexit wing for this to become an avalanche.

    I can identify with the commentator's curse. Boy I've made some mistaken predictions in the past.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    But who is Bell making his runs against ? (hint, most of them against the bottom of the second division...)
    He's a plausible short term expedient, but no more than that.

    England's problem is, of course, at 1,2 and 3.

    It's not as though we haven't tried a large number of options as openers; all have failed, and Cook is done.
    We don't have a number three at all (Root should be batting at four where he belongs - and though I agree he shouldn't be captain, there is no obvious replacement, though Woakes and Buttler are possibilities).

    We have a fine middle order and decent bowling options. And no solutions at the top of the order.
    There are plenty of good bowling attacks in Division Two...
    But he hasn't been making the heavy runs against all of them... and has been out cheaply in recent FC innings.
    But as I said, he a plausible short term expedient.

    Who do we have as a real prospect at three ?
    That's easy. Nobody.

    In the longer term Steve Eskinazi of Middlesex may come into the equation, but he isn't making runs at all against any sort of attack. Harry Finch of Sussex looks promising, but he's still young.

    There is a reason Root is there, and before him, Vince. It's called 'a dearth of alternatives.'
    That is a little unfair. Root is a class act, normally in the top 3 batsmen in the world.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,728
    Danny565 said:

    Danny565 said:

    So the only two Labour MPs to quit so far are one who was facing a sexual misconduct investigation, and one who had been deselected.

    Point of order: isn't it that he had been threatened with deselection?

    In which case, the path to absolute power within the Labour Party is clear for Momentum ...
    I think you're right: he'd already had a motion of no confidence passed in him, which obviously indicates a strong likelihood of deselection, but it hadn't formally happened yet.

    I've always quite liked Field; he's always been a genuinely independently-minded MP, who doesn't just have kneejerk stances depending on what other people on his "wing" of the party thought (although people mainly focus on some his more right-wing stances, he also has sometimes criticised the Labour leadership from the left, e.g. Harriet Harman's stupid support of the government's welfare cuts). I wouldn't have voted for the motion of no confidence personally. But still, anyone who thinks this is about the principle rather than the personal is kidding themselves.
    It's probably both, perhaps with some other factors thrown in as well.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,692

    Listening to the BBC reporting they are not holding back quoting from Frank Field's letter

    Frank Field is one of the good guys. We want more MPs like him.
    You mean he props up May??
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    Should England really be taking a leg bye to put Broad back on strike at the end of the over?
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    edited August 2018

    So much for Nick P's strategy of keeping quiet about antisemitism. Every time the story looks like it might die down, something comes up to push it back up the news agenda.

    The fact that Corbyn can't kill this row suggests that if he becomes PM and has to deal with a crisis, it won't go very well.

    These things aren't organically "coming up", they're deliberately being put on the news agenda. The wreath story is a rerun, it was a story during the 2017 election. The public ignored it.
    I agree with this. What I don’t know is who is responsible for these stories dominating the news agenda. My guess is the Labour Right.

    Of course, it is perfectly fair, as this is what your political enemies do. I doubt if the story of Toff Cameron & the pig was true, but it was cleverly used by his enemies and played into Cameron’s weakness as seemingly very rich & privileged.

    A good politician should be able to move the news agenda on. Corbyn has not managed to do this.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,677
    edited August 2018

    Listening to the BBC reporting they are not holding back quoting from Frank Field's letter

    Frank Field is one of the good guys. We want more MPs like him.
    You mean he props up May??
    Nominated Corbyn. What an error of judgement.
  • Listening to the BBC reporting they are not holding back quoting from Frank Field's letter

    Frank Field is one of the good guys. We want more MPs like him.
    You mean he props up May??
    No he stands for what he believes in across a whole range of issues. He has a long record of trying to help people without enriching himself.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,206
    Kudos to Frank Field for doing the recent thing and resigning the Labour whip, as an independent he also avoids any deselection attempts
  • A Labpur Party that has no room in it for people like Field should be ashamed of itself.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    Nigelb said:

    ydoethur said:

    DavidL said:

    ydoethur said:

    England's top six today scored a grand total of 71.

    Ian Bell is 141 not out, on a day when pretty much every other side is struggling with the bat (if you want to see a car crash, look at Leicestershire).

    Can I remind people I recently tipped him to be recalled for Sri Lanka?

    Good call. I would play him at 3 and drop Root to 4. The problem, however, is who plays 1 and 2.
    I wouldn't play Root either. Give him the winter off.

    As a temporary measure, Denly and Burns to open, Bell at three, maybe Buttler at four as captain, Bairstow, Stokes, Ali, Woakes (also either captain or vice captain) Curran, Rashid, Porter.

    I think that would be an interesting side and give our misfiring seniors (a) a much needed break and (b) a sharp reminder that they perform or they're out.
    But who is Bell making his runs against ? (hint, most of them against the bottom of the second division...)
    He's a plausible short term expedient, but no more than that.

    England's problem is, of course, at 1,2 and 3.

    It's not as though we haven't tried a large number of options as openers; all have failed, and Cook is done.
    We don't have a number three at all (Root should be batting at four where he belongs - and though I agree he shouldn't be captain, there is no obvious replacement, though Woakes and Buttler are possibilities).

    We have a fine middle order and decent bowling options. And no solutions at the top of the order.
    There are plenty of good bowling attacks in Division Two...
    But he hasn't been making the heavy runs against all of them... and has been out cheaply in recent FC innings.
    But as I said, he a plausible short term expedient.

    Who do we have as a real prospect at three ?
    That's easy. Nobody.

    In the longer term Steve Eskinazi of Middlesex may come into the equation, but he isn't making runs at all against any sort of attack. Harry Finch of Sussex looks promising, but he's still young.

    There is a reason Root is there, and before him, Vince. It's called 'a dearth of alternatives.'
    That is a little unfair. Root is a class act, normally in the top 3 batsmen in the world.
    He's a good batsman although in the last year he's been very been prone to pretty cameos.

    But he is not a number 3, unfortunately, or at least, not a number three cum captain.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    A Labpur Party that has no room in it for people like Field should be ashamed of itself.

    +1
  • glwglw Posts: 9,916

    I think it is the claim of it being super cheap that is being mocked.

    Okay the claims about the costs are silly, but it probably is the cheapest secure way for Khan to travel.
This discussion has been closed.