Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The first phone poll of the campaign has UKIP down to 4% and t

SystemSystem Posts: 11,017
edited April 2017 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The first phone poll of the campaign has UKIP down to 4% and the Tories at 49%

This morning, in the London Evening Standard, we have the first telephone poll of the general election campaign. The figures are very much in line with the other polls that we’ve seen in the last week.

Read the full story here


«134567

Comments

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,378
    edited April 2017
    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,827

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
  • Options
    For Justin, the Tory lead is only 15% when all voters are taken into account.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    If the Con share gets any bigger on the pie chart it'll be a cross between a smurf and Pacman.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Oh god we are back to margaret from Margate type questions...
  • Options
    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    That was part of Dave and George's masterful strategy to SaveJez.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 38,951

    Oh god we are back to margaret from Margate type questions...

    Don't worry, it may well be the last time.

    But never underestimate Corbyn's ability to cling on to the dying corpse he's leading.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Kim Jong may just laying out how they are going to bury jezza with his team's mad thoughts on abolishing MI5, disarming the plod, etc etc etc
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,827
    Baxtering these figures, and Panelbase's for Scotland, gives the Conservatives 420 seats, and 156 for Labour.
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    Corbyn auditioning for a job as a public sector union official.
  • Options
    Oh dear, Clive Lewis has dug himself into an even bigger hole over that polling 'analysis'

    https://twitter.com/1000cuts/status/857186026896465920
    https://twitter.com/chrishanretty/status/857188075616833536
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Kim Jong may has been doing some prep for this PMQs and jezza has just walked into it.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    This poll is very significant for the reasons Mike gives in the header - it's not dependent on past-vote weighting (which might be very unreliable in the current political climate), and it's not an online poll. It addition, we have the leadership ratings. The fact that it confirms what the other pollsters are showing is a strong indication that the polling figures we're seeing are likely to be reliable.
  • Options

    If the Con share gets any bigger on the pie chart it'll be a cross between a smurf and Pacman.

    Can you answer this question me, what colour would a smurf turn if you tried to strangle it?
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,262

    Oh god we are back to margaret from Margate type questions...

    Don't worry, it may well be the last time.

    But never underestimate Corbyn's ability to cling on to the dying corpse he's leading.
    Quite a sensible strategy, making it a bit more difficult for May to ignore the issues raised by the public and simply churn out her prepared attack lines.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    edited April 2017
    Mr. Eagles, I was annoyed when I couldn't use "The sky was bluer than a drowning smurf" in Sir Edric's Adventures (too modern).

    Edited extra bit: almost as irksome as when I had to axe: "That's about as tempting an offer as a handjob from Edward Scissorhands."
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    chestnut said:

    Corbyn auditioning for a job as a public sector union official.

    It does seems all the people who write to jezza are public sector workers. Not a lot of small business owners.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,917
    Sean_F said:

    Baxtering these figures, and Panelbase's for Scotland, gives the Conservatives 420 seats, and 156 for Labour.

    No chance Labour gets over 150 if the Tories really do hit 49%.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 38,951
    Corbyn: "she writes with a heavy heart."

    Surely that'll make a bit of a mess of the paper?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited April 2017
    Rigged system.....
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,262

    This poll is very significant for the reasons Mike gives in the header - it's not dependent on past-vote weighting (which might be very unreliable in the current political climate), and it's not an online poll. It addition, we have the leadership ratings. The fact that it confirms what the other pollsters are showing is a strong indication that the polling figures we're seeing are likely to be reliable.

    How do phone polls work (randomly) nowadays when younger people increasingly don't bother to have a landline and there isn't any real directory of mobile numbers?
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,704
    Dear God, is this really Corbyn's last pitch at PMQs.

    Just begone, begone.
  • Options
    Carolus_RexCarolus_Rex Posts: 1,414

    Mr. Eagles, I was annoyed when I couldn't use "The sky was bluer than a drowning smurf" in Sir Edric's Adventures (too modern).

    Edited extra bit: almost as irksome as when I had to axe: "That's about as tempting an offer as a handjob from Edward Scissorhands."

    Perhaps you should try a different genre?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105
    This poll is a load of bollocks. No way are Labour going to fall back by only 5% from the tally of Ed the Magnificent....
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,704
    Sybil? Maureen? lol
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    This is truly terrible....
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited April 2017
    The question all those who wish Lbour well are asking is 'why hasn't Corbyn commited seppuku?'
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    Corbyn has found an 88 year old who would vote for him! Remarkable.
  • Options
    I heard that as 'I like Corbyn's butt' and went to the scary visual place.
  • Options
    EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,956

    Oh god we are back to margaret from Margate type questions...

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BookEnds
    Matching scenes at the beginning and end of a story, often to show how things have changed through the course of the series, or to demonstrate that they haven't changed at all.
  • Options
    Complete knock out by Theresa

    Be gone Corbyn, you are a national disgrace
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,704

    I heard that as 'I like Corbyn's butt' and went to the scary visual place.

    I like Corbyn's Butts and i cannot lie?
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 38,951
    Roger said:

    The question all thoe who wish Lbour well are asking is why hasn't Corbyn commited seppuku?

    He hasn't finished the task he was given by the blessed Margaret:

    From the Downing Street confidential files, 5th May 1983:

    MT: So, my friend, it is the election next month.

    JC: Yes.

    MT: And you have managed to complete the first stage of your task: to gain the candidature for Islington North?

    JC: Yes ma'am, overwhelmingly.

    MT: Good, good. (Shuffles in her handbag and checks her makeup in a mirror). I called you in here to confirm you know the mission.

    JC: I am to destroy the Labour party.

    MT: Not destroy. Annihilate. Eradicate.

    JC: But if I may, ma'am, how? I will be just one MP.

    MT: Oh, do keep up JC! They said you were one of our brightest agents!

    JC: It seems an impossible task ma'am. I'll be just one MP against many.

    MT: Just one male MP, you mean. It's not as though Labour will ever elect a female leader!

    (laughter)

    MT: No, we are playing the long game. One of my predecessors put the current Labour leader in place, and he's doing a fine job in destroying his party. It's really a sterling job. Of course I've been helped by the deal I did with the General over that bit of nonsense last year. (winks)

    (more laughter)

    MT: No, we have to play the long game. As good as the present incumbent is, he's not performed well enough. The Labour Party will arise, and will become a power. We have plans to stifle their popularity: perhaps a war in a far-off country, perhaps over oil? How about Iraq? Yes, that'll do. We'll wait for a really popular Labour PM to come along, and drop the WMD-bomb. Not a real bomb, obviously.

    JC: Not yet, ma'am!

    (more laughter)

    MT: And you will, of course, be against the war. You will be a figurehead of the far-left of the party, along with agent Benn. You'll bide your time, creeping amongst the shadows, building support. We all know what the far-left are like: the more stupid, the more implausible the policy, the more they like it!

    JC: I've had an idea, ma'am. How about ballistic missile submarines without any missiles?

    MT: Oh I say! That's rather excellent! Perhaps you are as bright as MI5 claim.

    JC: Thank you, ma'am. So I wait, for what?

    MT: For the moment when a popular Labour leader mucks up - with a little help from us, of course. You can help: undermine them; vote against them: the best thing is they'll expect you to do it!

    (starts to file her claws)

    MT: And then, at the right moment, strike! Go for the leadership! Become leader of the Labour party and make them unelectable! Destroy them! Annihilate them in Scotland! Obliterate them in Wales! Smash them in the cities! Make another Labour government an impossibility!

    JC: Very good, ma'am. But how about the alliance?

    MT: (laughs). Oh don't worry, we have a plan for them as well! The thing with the dog worked well, didn't it?
  • Options
    calumcalum Posts: 3,046

    Corbyn: "she writes with a heavy heart."

    Surely that'll make a bit of a mess of the paper?

    Jeremy from Islington writes ....
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,704
    Did Corbyn really let he 'he's a terrorist sympathiser' jibe just wash over him?
  • Options
    RestharrowRestharrow Posts: 233
    "Clearly the main feature of this campaign has been Labour’s inability to break out of the mid-20s..."

    As soon as Corbyn gets out meeting people I'm fairly sure they'll no longer be in the mid-20s.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    Mr. Rex, it's not common for me to have a modern line, and there lots of great fantasy and historical ones.

  • Options

    I heard that as 'I like Corbyn's butt' and went to the scary visual place.

    A Diane Abbot moment for you.

  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 38,951

    I heard that as 'I like Corbyn's butt' and went to the scary visual place.

    Even Abbot smirked.
  • Options

    Did Corbyn really let he 'he's a terrorist sympathiser' jibe just wash over him?

    Yup.
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Corbyn getting angry is not a pretty or electable sight. This couldn't have gone better for TMay.
  • Options
    Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,300
    Terrible numbers for UKIP. Their problem is that the Tories have seized Brexit and UKIP have yet to find a distinctive voice. The Lib Dems have the repeal-Brexit constituency sewn up, so perhaps UKIP could reinvent themselves as the champions of a more liberal, soft, cosmopolitan Brexit. I'd vote for them if they did!
  • Options
    EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,956
    Sounds like PMQs will be worth a look when I get home.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,262
    May doesn't seem very good at talking and thinking simultaneously
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    @JosiasJessup

    That note from the archives is really rather good. Thank you.
  • Options
    kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 3,942
    Pulpstar said:

    Sean_F said:

    Baxtering these figures, and Panelbase's for Scotland, gives the Conservatives 420 seats, and 156 for Labour.

    No chance Labour gets over 150 if the Tories really do hit 49%.
    Continuing my thoughts from previous thread, you can get Labour 100 - 149 seats at 2.66 on Betfair right now if you fancy it, but for me the really good odds are in the Con Majority section.

    If Labour fall beneath 150 seats the Con majority is almost certainly over 175, you can currently get odds on Con Majority on Betfair:

    175 - 199 at 8
    200 - 224 at 11
    225 - 250 at 10.5

    Worth a punt? I've stuck a few quid on, just in case.
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040
    Both May and Corbyn are poor at this. C.f. with Blair and Hague.
  • Options
    marke09marke09 Posts: 926
    Not long ago the opposition parties were moaning that the youngsters were having to pay for austerity and rich pensioners were getting perk after perk - now those perks may be taken away its cruel and nasty
  • Options
    MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    Ipso Mori poll 26/05/1983 Con 51 Lab 29 All 19 overstated Conservatives by 8%
  • Options
    murali_s said:

    Both May and Corbyn are poor at this. C.f. with Blair and Hague.

    May demolished Corbyn today.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,317
    Not sure why the Tories are still available at 5/1 and 10/1 in West Bromwich West and West Bromwich East.

    The combined Tory/UKIP is at c.45% and Sandwell voted over 66% to Leave.

    If I were Tom Watson, I'd be very worried.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,804
    The wait for a Con 30% will have to continue a bit longer... :D
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105

    Terrible numbers for UKIP. Their problem is that the Tories have seized Brexit and UKIP have yet to find a distinctive voice. The Lib Dems have the repeal-Brexit constituency sewn up, so perhaps UKIP could reinvent themselves as the champions of a more liberal, soft, cosmopolitan Brexit. I'd vote for them if they did!

    It doesn't help that UKIP is led by a hopeless knob.

    You can say what you like about Farage, he wasn't hopeless.

    Just a knob.
  • Options

    Ipso Mori poll 26/05/1983 Con 51 Lab 29 All 19 overstated Conservatives by 8%

    But all the polls are now much in line.

    I cannot see any result other than a conservative majority but accept caution is needed on it's size.

    However, there must be a chance of a labour wipeout and if the move is copied in Scotland and Wales the Lib Dems may not make much headway
  • Options
    rogerhrogerh Posts: 282
    What is difference between headline voting intention and all giving a voting intention? I notice the Tory share is 49 on headline but 45 on the all giving intention?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,917
    kyf_100 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Sean_F said:

    Baxtering these figures, and Panelbase's for Scotland, gives the Conservatives 420 seats, and 156 for Labour.

    No chance Labour gets over 150 if the Tories really do hit 49%.
    Continuing my thoughts from previous thread, you can get Labour 100 - 149 seats at 2.66 on Betfair right now if you fancy it, but for me the really good odds are in the Con Majority section.

    If Labour fall beneath 150 seats the Con majority is almost certainly over 175, you can currently get odds on Con Majority on Betfair:

    175 - 199 at 8
    200 - 224 at 11
    225 - 250 at 10.5

    Worth a punt? I've stuck a few quid on, just in case.
    I've bought Tories on the spreads at 384 and have a few hundred over various numbers.
  • Options

    Not sure why the Tories are still available at 5/1 and 10/1 in West Bromwich West and West Bromwich East.

    The combined Tory/UKIP is at c.45% and Sandwell voted over 66% to Leave.

    If I were Tom Watson, I'd be very worried.

    Incumbency and (Deputy) Leaders get a boost.
  • Options
    BannedInParisBannedInParis Posts: 2,191
    rogerh said:

    What is difference between headline voting intention and all giving a voting intention? I notice the Tory share is 49 on headline but 45 on the all giving intention?

    They whittle it down by "how likely are they to actually vote".
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    edited April 2017
    Mr. Royale, looking at the results from last time, I'm inclined to agree. Especially for West Bromwich West:

    2015 - Lab 16.5k
    UKIP 8.8k
    Con 8.3k

    Huge purple vote to eat into, Labour likely to decline.

    Edited extra bit: anyway, must be off.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891

    Terrible numbers for UKIP. Their problem is that the Tories have seized Brexit and UKIP have yet to find a distinctive voice. The Lib Dems have the repeal-Brexit constituency sewn up, so perhaps UKIP could reinvent themselves as the champions of a more liberal, soft, cosmopolitan Brexit. I'd vote for them if they did!

    LOL! Pehaps the Clactonians will suggest it when the BBC next do a vox pop there.
  • Options
    Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,300
    Labour supporters must be counting the days - Labour's annihilation, Jezza's resultant removal and the processes of rebuilding can't come soon enough.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105

    Not sure why the Tories are still available at 5/1 and 10/1 in West Bromwich West and West Bromwich East.

    The combined Tory/UKIP is at c.45% and Sandwell voted over 66% to Leave.

    If I were Tom Watson, I'd be very worried.

    If I were Tom Watson, my wife would be even more worried....
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    Terrible numbers for UKIP. Their problem is that the Tories have seized Brexit and UKIP have yet to find a distinctive voice. The Lib Dems have the repeal-Brexit constituency sewn up, so perhaps UKIP could reinvent themselves as the champions of a more liberal, soft, cosmopolitan Brexit. I'd vote for them if they did!

    Mr. Dawning, if UKIP were to continue as a political party after their reason for being was accomplished then they would have had to start moving into new areas last June. As I said on here at the time their best hope would have been to stake out the concerns of the working classes as their territory but, as I also predicted, they did not have the will or the ability to do so. Too late now.
  • Options
    MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699

    Ipso Mori poll 26/05/1983 Con 51 Lab 29 All 19 overstated Conservatives by 8%

    But all the polls are now much in line.

    I cannot see any result other than a conservative majority but accept caution is needed on it's size.

    However, there must be a chance of a labour wipeout and if the move is copied in Scotland and Wales the Lib Dems may not make much headway
    They were all in line in 1983 average Conservative overstatement in final polls was 4%
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105
    Plug!!
  • Options
    ProdicusProdicus Posts: 658
    edited April 2017
    Wish I were a cartoonist. I see a bedraggled, mad-eyed Zombie Corbyn determinedly dragging the mangled corpse of Labour, by the heels, into the western sunset, an oblivious expression on his face and trampling hundreds of Stop the War coalition placards as he goes.
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    Not sure why the Tories are still available at 5/1 and 10/1 in West Bromwich West and West Bromwich East.

    The combined Tory/UKIP is at c.45% and Sandwell voted over 66% to Leave.

    If I were Tom Watson, I'd be very worried.

    Midlands subsamples are consistently coming in with the Tories in the high 50s, even low 60s.

    Labour are going to get hammered in middle England if these are repeated on June 8th.

    Handful of seats in Birmingham, Leicester, Nottingham.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,317

    Mr. Royale, looking at the results from last time, I'm inclined to agree. Especially for West Bromwich West:

    2015 - Lab 16.5k
    UKIP 8.8k
    Con 8.3k

    Huge purple vote to eat into, Labour likely to decline.

    Edited extra bit: anyway, must be off.

    Seats like this in the West Midlands will go before numerically lower majority seats in the North East, IMHO.
  • Options
    IanB2 said:

    May doesn't seem very good at talking and thinking simultaneously

    Or even separately
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,317
    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    These sort of leads wouldn't have happened under Dave because his team made it very clear they didn't want UKIP's votes.

    So they didn't get UKIP's votes.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    IanB2 said:

    May doesn't seem very good at talking and thinking simultaneously

    Or even separately
    Yet she seems to have huge poll ratings and is very likely to re-elected with a bigger majority.
  • Options

    Ipso Mori poll 26/05/1983 Con 51 Lab 29 All 19 overstated Conservatives by 8%

    But all the polls are now much in line.

    I cannot see any result other than a conservative majority but accept caution is needed on it's size.

    However, there must be a chance of a labour wipeout and if the move is copied in Scotland and Wales the Lib Dems may not make much headway
    They were all in line in 1983 average Conservative overstatement in final polls was 4%
    Maybe but it is not just the polls. There is a substantial volume of evidence in media reporting across the UK and indeed labour themselves are expecting heavy losses
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040

    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    These sort of leads wouldn't have happened under Dave because his team made it very clear they didn't want UKIP's votes.

    So they didn't get UKIP's votes.
    So we now have the re-toxification of the Tory party? Bigots and racists flocking to the blue banner then? OK...
  • Options
    ProdicusProdicus Posts: 658
    Corbynista Bouattia ousted from NUS chair. Straw in the wind.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,317
    murali_s said:

    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    These sort of leads wouldn't have happened under Dave because his team made it very clear they didn't want UKIP's votes.

    So they didn't get UKIP's votes.
    So we now have the re-toxification of the Tory party? Bigots and racists flocking to the blue banner then? OK...
    That's your prejudice, not mine.

    You have UKIP voters voting for a PM who brought in gay marriage and will maintain international aid. But, she also treats them with respect and will deliver Brexit and immigration control, so they are happy to support her.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Sir Eric Pickles uses his last PMQ to slam Tim Farron.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @MrHarryCole: E Pickles goes nuclear on David Ward with his last ever questions to the Commons. Suspect Mr Ward won't be candidate by the end of the day.
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040
    Scott_P said:
    No deal would be catastrophic. Everyone bar a few right-wing nutters, both here and outside acknowledge this.
  • Options
    MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699

    Ipso Mori poll 26/05/1983 Con 51 Lab 29 All 19 overstated Conservatives by 8%

    But all the polls are now much in line.

    I cannot see any result other than a conservative majority but accept caution is needed on it's size.

    However, there must be a chance of a labour wipeout and if the move is copied in Scotland and Wales the Lib Dems may not make much headway
    They were all in line in 1983 average Conservative overstatement in final polls was 4%
    Maybe but it is not just the polls. There is a substantial volume of evidence in media reporting across the UK and indeed labour themselves are expecting heavy losses
    Of course Labour are heading for a big defeat but IMHO Cons at 43-45 is much more likely than 48-50
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Then Tim Farron is called...
  • Options
    calumcalum Posts: 3,046
    The dwindling band of SLAB supporters I know are starting to shift - in general older voters breaking for SCON - younger for SNP - no interest in LDs/Greens !!
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098
    murali_s said:

    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    These sort of leads wouldn't have happened under Dave because his team made it very clear they didn't want UKIP's votes.

    So they didn't get UKIP's votes.
    So we now have the re-toxification of the Tory party? Bigots and racists flocking to the blue banner then? OK...
    Aren't you happy? If all those bigots and racists are flocking to the Conservatives then, surely, the Labour vote will go up.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105
    Scott_P said:

    Then Tim Farron is called...

    ...after Eric Pickles berates the LibDems for their Bradford candidate. And the PM kicks him in the nuts about it.
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040

    murali_s said:

    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    These sort of leads wouldn't have happened under Dave because his team made it very clear they didn't want UKIP's votes.

    So they didn't get UKIP's votes.
    So we now have the re-toxification of the Tory party? Bigots and racists flocking to the blue banner then? OK...
    That's your prejudice, not mine.

    You have UKIP voters voting for a PM who brought in gay marriage and will maintain international aid. But, she also treats them with respect and will deliver Brexit and immigration control, so they are happy to support her.
    Vague words - what the f*ck does immigration control mean? What does Brexit mean? You don;t know, I don;t know, no-one knows.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @jessicaelgot: PM goes for @timfarron over selection of David Ward in Bradford East "questionable record on antisemitism."How long can LDs let this run on?

    @steve_hawkes: Tim Farron looks like he'd rather go back to answering questions about gay sex
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040

    murali_s said:

    Sean_F said:

    Theresa is crap, Dave got 52% with Ipsos MORI.

    Yes, but the Conservatives were sometimes behind Corbyn's Labour under Dave.
    These sort of leads wouldn't have happened under Dave because his team made it very clear they didn't want UKIP's votes.

    So they didn't get UKIP's votes.
    So we now have the re-toxification of the Tory party? Bigots and racists flocking to the blue banner then? OK...
    Aren't you happy? If all those bigots and racists are flocking to the Conservatives then, surely, the Labour vote will go up.
    In time, my dear friend. In time....
  • Options
    This will 30 mins PMQs will last nearly 60mins
  • Options
    Scott_P said:

    @jessicaelgot: PM goes for @timfarron over selection of David Ward in Bradford East "questionable record on antisemitism."How long can LDs let this run on?

    @steve_hawkes: Tim Farron looks like he'd rather go back to answering questions about gay sex

    Questions on gay sex and antisemitism are going to be a disaster for him
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105
    Looks like the Speaker is calling everyone who is standing down. Will finish about half four....
  • Options
    SirNorfolkPassmoreSirNorfolkPassmore Posts: 6,258
    edited April 2017

    Terrible numbers for UKIP. Their problem is that the Tories have seized Brexit and UKIP have yet to find a distinctive voice. The Lib Dems have the repeal-Brexit constituency sewn up, so perhaps UKIP could reinvent themselves as the champions of a more liberal, soft, cosmopolitan Brexit. I'd vote for them if they did!

    In reality, they just aren't going to do that.

    Carswell was the voice of the "it's not about immigration, it's about sovereignty" brigade. He, and others like him, have signalled "mission accomplished" and returned to the Tories or left the scene.

    It is all, in Cameron's ill-advised phrase, "fruitcakes, loonies, and closet racists" now, albeit increasingly not that well closeted. Their time may come again, although I fervently hope not, but I just don't see how it can (in practice) be as anything other than the BNP in blazers - that's the path they've chosen collectively.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,053
    Apparently he's planning to stand against Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/guidofawkes/status/857201292359462916
  • Options
    ToryJimToryJim Posts: 3,407

    Looks like the Speaker is calling everyone who is standing down. Will finish about half four....

    As PMQs is the biggest opportunity for Bercow to grandstand, could he be about to announce his departure after a final flourish?
  • Options
    trawltrawl Posts: 142
    Re West Bromwich East, that's my home constituency (I'm in a neighbouring Brum constituency but my mom still lives there). May be it's just history but I still can't see it not being Labour which it has been all my life. My mother cannot abide Watson but he has the profile provided by Dep Leader & is visible in the constituency despite presumably being busy with party stuff. I know Scotland 2015 and all that but they had the SNP to vote for. If UKIP had got its act together to take on Labour in its heartlands like they said they would then maybe but a direct switch of a lot of WWC voters to the Tories in what is tbh a bit of a rough place - as I say I' m not convinced. DYOR and throw this advice back in my face in June by all means.
This discussion has been closed.