Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As we edge towards the enactment of the A50 Bill Nicola has ju

1246

Comments

  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    Is the end of the UK the price we'll pay for Brexit?
  • Options
    SaltireSaltire Posts: 525
    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    This is true but since Yes had majority in the under 35s and also the C2DEs I would say that they have a bigger task than the No camp and anecdotally I know of many more Yes than No voters who had never voted before.
    This might well be a war of attrition regarding enthusiasm since 2 years is a long way off!
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Jonathan said:

    Is the end of the UK the price we'll pay for Brexit?

    No

    The final bill will be much higher than that
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,079
    Saltire said:

    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    This is true but since Yes had majority in the under 35s and also the C2DEs I would say that they have a bigger task than the No camp and anecdotally I know of many more Yes than No voters who had never voted before.
    This might well be a war of attrition regarding enthusiasm since 2 years is a long way off!
    Ugh, it's as long as an american presidential election, but much much worse because it is closer to home.
    Jonathan said:

    Is the end of the UK the price we'll pay for Brexit?

    Hopefully not.
    chestnut said:

    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    Ipsos have some likely to vote numbers.

    The frailest are the young and among renters. Both are Yes friendly.
    Where my faint hope remains. But they came out last time.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    Can anyone explain to me why Manchester United spent £89 million on Paul Pogba, he seems a very expensive Eric Djemba-Djemba

    Because they missed out on signing Pan Ic
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,017
    Scott_P said:

    Jonathan said:

    Is the end of the UK the price we'll pay for Brexit?

    No

    The final bill will be much higher than that
    Which twat called this referendum?
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,319
    Lords Division on Amendment 2.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,079
    SeanT said:

    How to destroy a TV show.

    Top Gear ratings falling again. Down from last week, down 2m from the awful Chris Evans version. Dying.

    http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/national/article/Call-The-Midwife-finale-puts-brakes-on-Top-Gear-viewing-figures-bc95b8ae-6d71-443c-900f-c9b66ca95b4e-ds

    I maintain Clarkson wanted to go. He was the one who told everybody he was on his last chance, without telling people that it seems conceivable the BBC would have fudged things so they didn't have to sack him.

    What they need to do now is do what Amazon did with GBBO - let someone else keep the brand name, but have their own version which is the same old crew and even better.
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited March 2017
    Saltire said:

    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    This is true but since Yes had majority in the under 35s and also the C2DEs I would say that they have a bigger task than the No camp and anecdotally I know of many more Yes than No voters who had never voted before.
    This might well be a war of attrition regarding enthusiasm since 2 years is a long way off!
    Yes have the classic losing demographic.

    Brexit was won by the homeowning 50 plussers and lost by the can't-be-arsed, twenty-something renters who would rather play Grand Theft Auto.

    And that is for the best because the 20 something renters will grow to be 50 plus homeowners one day but the reverse will never happen.
  • Options
    CyanCyan Posts: 1,262
    edited March 2017
    Janan Ganesh is right that Sturgeon's proposal was meant to be rejected, so that she could stamp her foot and whip up the north-of-the-border nationalism that is based precisely on foot-stamping. But other than that, what is he talking about?

    "Mrs May cannot sign off on hard exit terms without risking the loss of Scotland, three-fifths of whose electorate voted for the EU."

    So what? What proportion of the Scottish electorate has switched to being pro-independence because if Scotland becomes independent there's a possibility that it might be able to join the EU? 1%? And what proportion will keep to that view once it's pointed out to them that they'll have to install customs posts at the border and check passports, and let in all the Bulgarians and Romanians who want to come, even if they just want to get to England, because that's what the EU will tell them? 0.2%?

    "Such terms would not just threaten material harm to a small, trading economy, they would communicate England’s hauteur to the smaller nation."

    However much the xenophobic SNP say otherwise, Theresa May does not represent England when she talks with Nicola Sturgeon. May represents Scotland as much as she represents England. And much as it sticks in my craw to say so, May deserves praise for telling Sturgeon to stick her timetable up her sporran.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

  • Options
    BojabobBojabob Posts: 642
    Possible North London Derby FA Cup Final for the first time in history.
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,319
    edited March 2017
    Division List on EU Amendment 1.

    25 Lab peers voted for the amendment
    Zero Con Peers voted for the amendment
    216 Con Peers present

    http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/business-papers/lords/lords-divisions/
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,175
    The SNP getting some support from Dean the Scream.

    https://twitter.com/govhowarddean/status/841348291006722049
  • Options
    Bojabob said:

    Possible North London Derby FA Cup Final for the first time in history.

    Wenger's last match in charge of Arsenal could be losing the FA Cup final to Spurs.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    and the bbc have replaced them with little and large.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913

    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    and the bbc have replaced them with little and large.
    Who were popular and went on for years.
  • Options

    Bojabob said:

    Possible North London Derby FA Cup Final for the first time in history.

    Wenger's last match in charge of Arsenal could be losing the FA Cup final to Spurs.
    spurs winning 2 matches at Wemberlee..... hmm we can dream!
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    The Grand Tour was weird. Some moments of genius, some long moments of boredom, too much money, not enough sharp editing. But there were hints it could be great again, at least for a handful of seasons.

    There is no such hope in Top Gear. It's now just a really really average-to-dull show about cars, which, of course, Top Gear was until Clarkson revolutionised it.

    If I had to bet I'd say the Grand Tour is the more likely survivor, but what's certain is that the BBC has lost its cash cow. Ten zillion people across the world are not gonna watch that dreck with Le Blanc.
    The American is decent, celebrity brain crash bloody awful. The episodes that were good were very good, but there were too many very poor ones (by poor I mean boring rather than Chris Evans poor)
  • Options

    Bojabob said:

    Possible North London Derby FA Cup Final for the first time in history.

    Wenger's last match in charge of Arsenal could be losing the FA Cup final to Spurs.
    spurs winning 2 matches at Wemberlee..... hmm we can dream!
    Is it next season you play all your games at Wembley?

    If so, I'm sticking a cheeky ton on you lot to get relegated.
  • Options
    CyanCyan Posts: 1,262

    Is this true, did she really say this:

    ' Joanna Cherry (SNP, Edinburgh South West) raised the temperature yet further by quoting a Lithuanian constituent who had told her this country is now “worse than Lithuania under the Soviets”. '

    http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2017/03/andrew-gimsons-commons-sketch-england-is-the-mother-of-brexit.html

    If she did, she's a moron. Support for independence in the Lithuanian referendum of 1991 was 93%. In Scotland in 2014 it was 45%. Turnout was the same in both referendums: 85%.

    Time for an intelligence test before someone is allowed to become an MP?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    and the bbc have replaced them with little and large.
    Who were popular and went on for years.
    I was of course referring to modern day sad, depressing end of pier little and large.
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,319
    edited March 2017
    High turnout of Con Peers arriving early for EU Bill led to Government winning two very close votes at Report Stage on Higher Education Bill - though they still lost one by a wide margin.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    The Grand Tour was weird. Some moments of genius, some long moments of boredom, too much money, not enough sharp editing. But there were hints it could be great again, at least for a handful of seasons.

    There is no such hope in Top Gear. It's now just a really really average-to-dull show about cars, which, of course, Top Gear was until Clarkson revolutionised it.

    If I had to bet I'd say the Grand Tour is the more likely survivor, but what's certain is that the BBC has lost its cash cow. Ten zillion people across the world are not gonna watch that dreck with Le Blanc.
    Both will end. The cast will move on to other things. 16 years is an amazing run, but it's over.

  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,319
    EU Amendment 2:

    For - 118
    Against - 274

    Government wins.

    That's it!
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,636
    edited March 2017
    This is HUUUUUGGE

    EXCLUSIF. Présidentielle : Valls va appeler à soutenir Macron dès le premier tour

    http://www.leparisien.fr/elections/presidentielle/presidentielle-l-appel-de-valls-a-soutenir-macron-des-le-premier-tour-13-03-2017-6759426.php
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Cyan said:

    Janan Ganesh is right that Sturgeon's proposal was meant to be rejected, so that she could stamp her foot and whip up the north-of-the-border nationalism that is based precisely on foot-stamping. But other than that, what is he talking about?

    "Mrs May cannot sign off on hard exit terms without risking the loss of Scotland, three-fifths of whose electorate voted for the EU."

    So what? What proportion of the Scottish electorate has switched to being pro-independence because if Scotland becomes independent there's a possibility that it might be able to join the EU? 1%? And what proportion will keep to that view once it's pointed out to them that they'll have to install customs posts at the border and check passports, and let in all the Bulgarians and Romanians who want to come, even if they just want to get to England, because that's what the EU will tell them? 0.2%?

    "Such terms would not just threaten material harm to a small, trading economy, they would communicate England’s hauteur to the smaller nation."

    However much the xenophobic SNP say otherwise, Theresa May does not represent England when she talks with Nicola Sturgeon. May represents Scotland as much as she represents England. And much as it sticks in my craw to say so, May deserves praise for telling Sturgeon to stick her timetable up her sporran.

    You seem upset by all of this. Tell me about your mother.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    The Grand Tour was weird. Some moments of genius, some long moments of boredom, too much money, not enough sharp editing. But there were hints it could be great again, at least for a handful of seasons.

    There is no such hope in Top Gear. It's now just a really really average-to-dull show about cars, which, of course, Top Gear was until Clarkson revolutionised it.

    If I had to bet I'd say the Grand Tour is the more likely survivor, but what's certain is that the BBC has lost its cash cow. Ten zillion people across the world are not gonna watch that dreck with Le Blanc.
    Both will end. The cast will move on to other things. 16 years is an amazing run, but it's over.

    Maybe. That's what I've been thinking, too. But Clarkson is an authentic comic genius. He will have read the critiques, seen what's wrong, and he is capable of fixing it - perhaps.

    No one on or near Top Gear is a comic genius. It's dead.
    They would be better relaunching top gear as something different, not looking like the fake Elvis of labour party fame to the genuine article.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @ChrisMasonBBC: BREAKING: The Brexit Bill has cleared the Lords unamended allowing the Prime Minister to begin talks on a divorce deal for leaving the EU.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    Top Gear was dying before Clarkson left. The Grand Tour reminds me of when Morecambe and Wise went to ITV.

    The Grand Tour was weird. Some moments of genius, some long moments of boredom, too much money, not enough sharp editing. But there were hints it could be great again, at least for a handful of seasons.

    There is no such hope in Top Gear. It's now just a really really average-to-dull show about cars, which, of course, Top Gear was until Clarkson revolutionised it.

    If I had to bet I'd say the Grand Tour is the more likely survivor, but what's certain is that the BBC has lost its cash cow. Ten zillion people across the world are not gonna watch that dreck with Le Blanc.
    Both will end. The cast will move on to other things. 16 years is an amazing run, but it's over.

    Maybe. That's what I've been thinking, too. But Clarkson is an authentic comic genius. He will have read the critiques, seen what's wrong, and he is capable of fixing it - perhaps.

    No one on or near Top Gear is a comic genius. It's dead.
    They should have stuck to doing one off specials. Clarkson clearly misses the BBC. I suspect he'll be back one day when the Amazon money is gone.
  • Options
    Sky report from Coldstream showed virtual unanimity against the idea of a second referendum.

    Very nostalgic for me as a young man in my early teens I used to canoe under the bridge shown on the report on my way to Berwick, ironically weaving in and out of Scotland
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,106
    When is royal assent officially given?
  • Options
    HOL now passed the act and on it's way to the Palace
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,175
    Manuel Valls calling for people to vote for Macron in round 1 of the French election.
  • Options

    Manuel Valls calling for people to vote for Macron in round 1 of the French election.

    I posted that down thread.
  • Options

    When is royal assent officially given?

    Reported that it will be following the Queens breakfast tomorrow
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,328

    Sky report from Coldstream showed virtual unanimity against the idea of a second referendum.

    Very nostalgic for me as a young man in my early teens I used to canoe under the bridge shown on the report on my way to Berwick, ironically weaving in and out of Scotland

    Sky have actually gone to a place & spoken to people rather than quote 'sources'?

    Novel.
  • Options
    Alistair said:

    Cyan said:

    Janan Ganesh is right that Sturgeon's proposal was meant to be rejected, so that she could stamp her foot and whip up the north-of-the-border nationalism that is based precisely on foot-stamping. But other than that, what is he talking about?

    "Mrs May cannot sign off on hard exit terms without risking the loss of Scotland, three-fifths of whose electorate voted for the EU."

    So what? What proportion of the Scottish electorate has switched to being pro-independence because if Scotland becomes independent there's a possibility that it might be able to join the EU? 1%? And what proportion will keep to that view once it's pointed out to them that they'll have to install customs posts at the border and check passports, and let in all the Bulgarians and Romanians who want to come, even if they just want to get to England, because that's what the EU will tell them? 0.2%?

    "Such terms would not just threaten material harm to a small, trading economy, they would communicate England’s hauteur to the smaller nation."

    However much the xenophobic SNP say otherwise, Theresa May does not represent England when she talks with Nicola Sturgeon. May represents Scotland as much as she represents England. And much as it sticks in my craw to say so, May deserves praise for telling Sturgeon to stick her timetable up her sporran.

    You seem upset by all of this. Tell me about your mother.
    Voight-Kampff?
  • Options

    Sky report from Coldstream showed virtual unanimity against the idea of a second referendum.

    Very nostalgic for me as a young man in my early teens I used to canoe under the bridge shown on the report on my way to Berwick, ironically weaving in and out of Scotland

    Sky have actually gone to a place & spoken to people rather than quote 'sources'?

    Novel.
    Yes and it is a place full of happy childhood memories - but not a good report for Nicola.

  • Options
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Mrs May has a tiny majority.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    SeanT said:

    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.

    The SNP slogan is Take Back Control

    https://twitter.com/brianspanner1/status/746488316510482433
  • Options
    SaltireSaltire Posts: 525

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    Not sure that UKIP really have much say in this unless one D Carswell has that much clout in Parliament....
    I think what Sean has proposed is actually quite possible to happen, it would seem a more reasonable timetable than one that Nicola has come up with.
    I don't think that the SNP could keep Scotland in the EU before Brexit takes affect if Scotland votes YES in 2018 or 2019 therefore it make it more sensible to have the vote afterwards.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,238
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Boris is a complete fucking wanker. If anything would encourage an independent Scotland, it's him. Maybe they can paint him on the side of a bus.
  • Options
    steve_garnersteve_garner Posts: 1,019
    The PM should be most grateful to Gina Miller. The passing of the A50 bill puts her in a much stronger position than if she'd triggered it without parliamentary approval.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    The only surprising thing is that people are surprised by this. It was clear that Brexit would revive Scottish Independence. The tragedy is that our politics is now in a far weaker state. As we saw in Brexit, economic arguments don't work.
  • Options

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Mrs May has a tiny majority.
    No matter - the whips have been fantastic even persuading the rebels to abstain tonight. Not one voted against their Government
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189

    This is HUUUUUGGE

    EXCLUSIF. Présidentielle : Valls va appeler à soutenir Macron dès le premier tour

    http://www.leparisien.fr/elections/presidentielle/presidentielle-l-appel-de-valls-a-soutenir-macron-des-le-premier-tour-13-03-2017-6759426.php

    Assume you are being sarcastic. Valls and Macron both served in the French cabinet together, he obviously hates Hamon who beat him in the PS primary and he is hardly going to endorse Le Pen or Fillon.

    2 new polls today IFOP has Le Pen ahead on 26.5% to 25% for Macron, Opinion Way Le Pen ahead on 27% to 25% for Macron


    http://dataviz.ifop.com:8080/IFOP_ROLLING/IFOP_13-03-2017.pdf
    http://presicote.factoviz.com/index/more/id/qoo_lew_1
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,482

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Boris is a complete fucking wanker. If anything would encourage an independent Scotland, it's him. Maybe they can paint him on the side of a bus.
    Scotland can't be INDEPENDENT if she wears an pro-EU gimp suit :lol:
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,145
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    There will be Conservatives who are thinking that getting rid of 50+ leftist Scottish MPs has its advantages.
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    Yorkcity said:

    The Conservatives in parliament are totally united you have to hand it to them .They show no qualms which is doing well in the polls.

    Parliament has proven to be spineless. We have a ruling party with a large percentage of xenophobes, scoundrels and throwbacks, an opposition that is lost gazing in its own navel, an ineffective third party waiting for the voters to flock to its banners and a collection of other flotsam & jetsam.

    Frankly, I am not sure that Westminster (and by implication the UK) is saveable.
    I don't understand what your objection to a Conservative government is. You wanted it, pre-2010, and now you've got it. Theresa May and her Cabinet aren't by any means extremists.
    Pre 2010 we had Gordon running up massive debt and a labour govt that was riven by factionalism. They were wrecking the country

    Read what I wrote more carefully. I did not say that May was an extremist but that her party had a sizeable number of them. They are wrecking the country
    You should try living in a country where the ruling party really is full of extremists. You might come to appreciate your own country a bit more.
    Mrs C is from Northern Ireland :-)
    Compared to Sinn Fein and the DUP the Tories are bleeding hearts.
    :)
    I like your Sinn Fein flag, Bev :lol:
    I think not.....

    Here - treat yourself :)http://www.sinnfeinbookshop.com/sinn-fein-flag/
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300

    The PM should be most grateful to Gina Miller. The passing of the A50 bill puts her in a much stronger position than if she'd triggered it without parliamentary approval.

    I am not sure the MBE is in the post just yet.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,911
    edited March 2017
    chestnut said:

    Saltire said:

    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    This is true but since Yes had majority in the under 35s and also the C2DEs I would say that they have a bigger task than the No camp and anecdotally I know of many more Yes than No voters who had never voted before.
    This might well be a war of attrition regarding enthusiasm since 2 years is a long way off!
    Yes have the classic losing demographic.

    Brexit was won by the homeowning 50 plussers and lost by the can't-be-arsed, twenty-something renters who would rather play Grand Theft Auto.

    And that is for the best because the 20 something renters will grow to be 50 plus homeowners one day but the reverse will never happen.
    Brexit was won by the hangers and floggers and that's official
  • Options

    The PM should be most grateful to Gina Miller. The passing of the A50 bill puts her in a much stronger position than if she'd triggered it without parliamentary approval.

    Yes - Ironic
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,328
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Boris will just have to suck it up, particularly since he can't plead ignorance or innocence.

    'Boris Johnson predicted Brexit vote could break-up UK

    BORIS Johnson warned an English-only vote for Brexit could lead to Scottish independence and the break-up of the Union, a previously secret newspaper column has revealed.

    Written in February, two days before he backed the Leave side, the unpublished article also said remaining in the EU would be a “boon for the world and for Europe”.'

    http://tinyurl.com/zeys2jt
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,482

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    Yorkcity said:

    The Conservatives in parliament are totally united you have to hand it to them .They show no qualms which is doing well in the polls.

    Parliament has proven to be spineless. We have a ruling party with a large percentage of xenophobes, scoundrels and throwbacks, an opposition that is lost gazing in its own navel, an ineffective third party waiting for the voters to flock to its banners and a collection of other flotsam & jetsam.

    Frankly, I am not sure that Westminster (and by implication the UK) is saveable.
    I don't understand what your objection to a Conservative government is. You wanted it, pre-2010, and now you've got it. Theresa May and her Cabinet aren't by any means extremists.
    Pre 2010 we had Gordon running up massive debt and a labour govt that was riven by factionalism. They were wrecking the country

    Read what I wrote more carefully. I did not say that May was an extremist but that her party had a sizeable number of them. They are wrecking the country
    You should try living in a country where the ruling party really is full of extremists. You might come to appreciate your own country a bit more.
    Mrs C is from Northern Ireland :-)
    Compared to Sinn Fein and the DUP the Tories are bleeding hearts.
    :)
    I like your Sinn Fein flag, Bev :lol:
    I think not.....

    Here - treat yourself :)http://www.sinnfeinbookshop.com/sinn-fein-flag/
    I thought your Avatar might have been an Indian flag, but rotated 90 degrees :)
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189

    The SNP getting some support from Dean the Scream.

    https://twitter.com/govhowarddean/status/841348291006722049

    Well if he wants to interfere in our referendums I hope he doesn't complain when Brits back the Californian secessionist movement
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,017
    edited March 2017
    True Brexiteers will accept any deal that gets us out. Even a deal that is the same as being in. This is like the wisdom of Solomon, we don't want our baby killed, let someone else be in charge if need be

    If the voters want hard Brexit, they will get it eventually. Our relationship w the EU will change w each parliament. The big worry is still that the establishment will find a way to keep us in. Look how many different tricks they've thrown at us! I feel like the bloke in midnight express who keeps thinking he's gonna get released
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited March 2017
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Scotland is going to need a hell of a lot of pork thrown its way in order to avoid independence. It'll have to be done very publicly too.

    Little England will go nuts.

    "Your £350m a week? Yeah, sorry we're giving it to scotland instead"

    Needs must old chap
  • Options
    CyanCyan Posts: 1,262

    Sky report from Coldstream showed virtual unanimity against the idea of a second referendum.

    Very nostalgic for me as a young man in my early teens I used to canoe under the bridge shown on the report on my way to Berwick, ironically weaving in and out of Scotland

    Sky have actually gone to a place & spoken to people rather than quote 'sources'?

    Novel.
    Yes and it is a place full of happy childhood memories - but not a good report for Nicola.
    Film idea: tour the external EU borders, the hard ones where both the single market and the customs union stop. Morocco-Ceuta; Russia-Finland; Kaliningrad-Lithuania; Belarus-Poland; Bosnia-Croatia. Interview residents, lorry drivers, etc.

  • Options
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Mrs May has a tiny majority.
    But there's a big majority for Soft Brexit in the Commons.

    Mrs May has signed up to hard Brexit, that's what we're getting.

    And remember we might want a soft Brexit, but we might get a hard Brexit from the rest of the EU.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189
    Pong said:

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-nireland-idUKKBN16K28E

    "Northern Ireland's largest Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein on Monday said it wanted a referendum on splitting from the United Kingdom "as soon as possible", hours after Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon demanded a new independence vote."

    Yes, well unlike the SNP they do not have a majority at Stormont so tough
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    SeanT said:

    Jonathan said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    The only surprising thing is that people are surprised by this. It was clear that Brexit would revive Scottish Independence. The tragedy is that our politics is now in a far weaker state. As we saw in Brexit, economic arguments don't work.
    I'm not surprised by it. This was always the big risk of Brexit (and I said so on here). I am surprised by Sturgeon's timing. I genuinely can't work out if it's clever or stupid.
    It's aggressive and uncompromising, whilst Westminster is weak.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,079

    The PM should be most grateful to Gina Miller. The passing of the A50 bill puts her in a much stronger position than if she'd triggered it without parliamentary approval.

    Given how well the timeline has worked out with the self imposed deadline of the end of March, I'd almost be inclined to say it was planned around assuming the government would lose that case. But strengthening the position is one reason even if it was not legally required it seemed like it would have been a good idea.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 36,005
    Roger said:

    chestnut said:

    Saltire said:

    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    This is true but since Yes had majority in the under 35s and also the C2DEs I would say that they have a bigger task than the No camp and anecdotally I know of many more Yes than No voters who had never voted before.
    This might well be a war of attrition regarding enthusiasm since 2 years is a long way off!
    Yes have the classic losing demographic.

    Brexit was won by the homeowning 50 plussers and lost by the can't-be-arsed, twenty-something renters who would rather play Grand Theft Auto.

    And that is for the best because the 20 something renters will grow to be 50 plus homeowners one day but the reverse will never happen.
    Brexit was won by the hangers and floggers and that's official
    That's good.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,010

    The PM should be most grateful to Gina Miller. The passing of the A50 bill puts her in a much stronger position than if she'd triggered it without parliamentary approval.

    Constitutional clarity is never a bad thing.
  • Options
    CyanCyan Posts: 1,262
    HYUFD said:

    Pong said:

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-nireland-idUKKBN16K28E

    "Northern Ireland's largest Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein on Monday said it wanted a referendum on splitting from the United Kingdom "as soon as possible", hours after Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon demanded a new independence vote."

    Yes, well unlike the SNP they do not have a majority at Stormont so tough
    The SNP don't have a majority at Holyrood. Take another look!
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256


    Not at all, but remainers seem to have sunk into a narrative that

    everything about Brexit is bad
    anything bad that happens is a result of Brexit

    :astonished:

    usually expressed in emotive language

    Emotive? Moi???

    I feel like I am watching a trainee magician starting his chainsaw and telling his beautiful assistant not to worry, he is fairly sure that he has figured out how the trick is done. Now, stand here and we'll give it a go....


  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 41,017
    Cyan said:

    Sky report from Coldstream showed virtual unanimity against the idea of a second referendum.

    Very nostalgic for me as a young man in my early teens I used to canoe under the bridge shown on the report on my way to Berwick, ironically weaving in and out of Scotland

    Sky have actually gone to a place & spoken to people rather than quote 'sources'?

    Novel.
    Yes and it is a place full of happy childhood memories - but not a good report for Nicola.
    Film idea: tour the external EU borders, the hard ones where both the single market and the customs union stop. Morocco-Ceuta; Russia-Finland; Kaliningrad-Lithuania; Belarus-Poland; Bosnia-Croatia. Interview residents, lorry drivers, etc.

    Monkey tennis!
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,079
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Mrs May has a tiny majority.
    But there's a big majority for Soft Brexit in the Commons.

    They've not been inclined to push for that to date. The government has done a good job in presenting only its version as the only true Brexit.
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,145

    The PM should be most grateful to Gina Miller. The passing of the A50 bill puts her in a much stronger position than if she'd triggered it without parliamentary approval.

    Has Gina Miller given permission for a Scottish IndyRef yet ?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Mrs May has a tiny majority.
    But there's a big majority for Soft Brexit in the Commons.

    Mrs May has signed up to hard Brexit, that's what we're getting.

    And remember we might want a soft Brexit, but we might get a hard Brexit from the rest of the EU.
    Mrs May has actually never said she backed hard of soft Brexit, what she backs is a job offer requirement on immigration and bilateral trade agreements and probably some limited EU budget contributions, that is not the soft Brexit Remainers want but nor is it the hard Brexit UKIP want either
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    edited March 2017

    Mrs May has a tiny majority.

    And Boris and Michael have tiny .....
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,145
    Pong said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Scotland is going to need a hell of a lot of pork thrown its way in order to avoid independence. It'll have to be done very publicly too.

    Little England will go nuts.

    "Your £350m a week? Yeah, sorry we're giving it to scotland instead"

    Needs must old chap
    More likely May promises devolution to Holyrood of many of the powers recovered from Brussels.

    Now would Scotland want to give control of farming and fisheries back to Brussels upon Independence.
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    Sky report from Coldstream showed virtual unanimity against the idea of a second referendum.

    Very nostalgic for me as a young man in my early teens I used to canoe under the bridge shown on the report on my way to Berwick, ironically weaving in and out of Scotland

    Sky have actually gone to a place & spoken to people rather than quote 'sources'?

    Novel.
    Yes and it is a place full of happy childhood memories - but not a good report for Nicola.

    This is hardly surprising. Polls show that a fairly small minority of Scots want a vote pre-Brexit. 70% want to wait. In the Borders it will be 95%.

    This is the risk Sturgeon is taking (against her own instincts, if Sky are correct). The timing is clearly wrong. She is relying on TMay refusing in a helpful way.
    I expect TM to play with her - promise she will not stop a referendum but will not agree prior to Brexit. By that time the wording of the referendum will need to be agreed with the electoral commission, the legislation will need to be laid in Parliament and then go on to the Lords.

    The ability to be seen to consent by TM but allow the process to delay the actual vote till late 2019 or later which will be after we have left the EU will create far more problems for Nicola than TM.

  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189
    edited March 2017
    Cyan said:

    HYUFD said:

    Pong said:

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-nireland-idUKKBN16K28E

    "Northern Ireland's largest Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein on Monday said it wanted a referendum on splitting from the United Kingdom "as soon as possible", hours after Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon demanded a new independence vote."

    Yes, well unlike the SNP they do not have a majority at Stormont so tough
    The SNP don't have a majority at Holyrood. Take another look!
    They do with the Greens and the Greens back independence, that is a completely different prospect to Stormont where neither SF nor SF+SDLP have a majority or indeed Cardiff where PC are not only not the largest party but have no allies for independence either
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,175
    HYUFD said:

    what she backs is a job offer requirement on immigration

    Given the number of times you post this perhaps you can point to a quote where she said it?
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,238

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Saltire said:

    Part of the reason why I think they have decided to go for it now is that they know that they might not have the votes in Holyrood in the next Parliament and it is harder to have a referendum in 2020 or 2021 due to a GE and Holyrood elections.

    Surely this is key.

    SNP doesn't even have a majority now - they only just scrape over the line with the Greens.

    Any fallback at the next Holyrood elections and they couldn't call another referendum.
    Tempting for TMay to say the SNP cannot call a referendum during Brexit (which is true) then drag out the Brexit *transitional arrangements* til, ooh, late 2021.

    Then "allow" indyref2.

    TMay might just be the kind of flinty bitch that would do that. No man would dare.
    You think UKIP and Tory Brexiteers will find that acceptable?
    UKIP no, Tory Brexiteers yes. Remember people like Gove and Johnson are serious unionists.

    Yes yes, but also true.
    Gove and Johnson yes, I'm thinking of your hardcore Leavers.

    Try selling that to the likes of Andrew Rossindell, Philip Holloborne, Peter Bone et al.
    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.
    Mrs May has a tiny majority.
    But there's a big majority for Soft Brexit in the Commons.

    Mrs May has signed up to hard Brexit, that's what we're getting.

    And remember we might want a soft Brexit, but we might get a hard Brexit from the rest of the EU.
    Now, now , TSE, Brexit is going to be red, white and blue, and involve unicorns, fairies and lashings of ginger beer at Hobbiton, whilst we all watch Gandalf cycling across the village green to reminisce with his mates about how they defended blighty against the hun back in 41.

    Any suggestion that our negotiating position is desperately weak will be stamped on by Big Mother.

  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154
    Scott_P said:

    SeanT said:

    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.

    The SNP slogan is Take Back Control

    https://twitter.com/brianspanner1/status/746488316510482433
    Somewhere between the four thousandth and five thousandth time of your posting that link, it might perhaps be funny.

    But probably for ironic reasons.

  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,291
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,145
    Roger said:

    chestnut said:

    Saltire said:

    kle4 said:

    Saltire said:

    Also when it comes to changes in the vote from last time it is hard to imagine that the turnout will be any higher than the 85% that was achieved last time and indeed it might well be lower next time. It is one of the big challenges that face the YES camp is to get normal non-voters to turnout again.

    There is also the challenge of No for the same (some of them at any rate will have been No supporters), and also ensuring in general No voters are as enthused to come out as last time.
    This is true but since Yes had majority in the under 35s and also the C2DEs I would say that they have a bigger task than the No camp and anecdotally I know of many more Yes than No voters who had never voted before.
    This might well be a war of attrition regarding enthusiasm since 2 years is a long way off!
    Yes have the classic losing demographic.

    Brexit was won by the homeowning 50 plussers and lost by the can't-be-arsed, twenty-something renters who would rather play Grand Theft Auto.

    And that is for the best because the 20 something renters will grow to be 50 plus homeowners one day but the reverse will never happen.
    Brexit was won by the hangers and floggers and that's official
    So is that why you have an obsession with Hartlepool - for hanging a monkey.
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    The idea that 'soft Brexit' will appease the nationalists is foolish. They want one thing and one thing only.

    So, stop appeasing them. The Scots that value the UK need to get together and stick it to them.
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256

    I thought your Avatar might have been an Indian flag, but rotated 90 degrees :)

    What about the big swirly flower the Indian flag has? You are not trying to imply it is a type of shoe are you?

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    edited March 2017
    Talking of dead bbc programmes... Newsnight.

    I remember when the government felt compelled to put up somebody every night to defend their position, now nobody of any importance is a guest. (Government or opposition).
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189
    edited March 2017

    HYUFD said:

    what she backs is a job offer requirement on immigration

    Given the number of times you post this perhaps you can point to a quote where she said it?
    It has already been put to a Cabinet sub committee by Amber Rudd, EU workers will get a visa provided they have a skilled job to go to in the UK. Tourists and students would still have free access post Brexit. That is the basis of the immigration deal the UK government will offer the EU in return for a trade deal of some form
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3839154/EU-workers-visa-skilled-job.html
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,482

    I thought your Avatar might have been an Indian flag, but rotated 90 degrees :)

    What about the big swirly flower the Indian flag has? You are not trying to imply it is a type of shoe are you?

    It's not a flower, but a 24-spoked wheel:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka_Chakra
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,238
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    what she backs is a job offer requirement on immigration

    Given the number of times you post this perhaps you can point to a quote where she said it?
    It has already been put to a Cabinet sub committee by Amber Rudd, EU workers will get a visa provided they have a skilled job to go to in the UK. Tourists and students would still have free access post Brexit. That is the basis of the immigration deal the UK government will offer the EU in return for a trade deal of some form
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3839154/EU-workers-visa-skilled-job.html
    Is picking broccoli in the fens a skilled job? Or egg packing?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    edited March 2017
    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    SeanT said:

    They are a tiny minority. Bojo and Gove will be horrified by the idea of Joxit.

    Boris was particularly emotional during indyref1, and wrote some great unionist essays. Gove is a Scot, of course.

    There will be furrowed brows in Tory Brexit Central tonight.

    The SNP slogan is Take Back Control

    https://twitter.com/brianspanner1/status/746488316510482433
    Somewhere between the four thousandth and five thousandth time of your posting that link, it might perhaps be funny.

    But probably for ironic reasons.

    Dominic Cummings explained that photo in one of his brilliant essays. Apparently BoJo and Gove and the rest were ecstatic at the victory, and walked into Brexit HQ at 8am drinking Pol Roger from the bottle and high-fiving everyone.

    But by the time it came to that press conference Cameron had resigned and some felt genuinely sad and others felt they has to fake solemnity and grief, or it would be unseemly.

    Hence their sober, even glum expressions.
    Haven't you heard, facts are irrelevant these days.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 117,189

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    what she backs is a job offer requirement on immigration

    Given the number of times you post this perhaps you can point to a quote where she said it?
    It has already been put to a Cabinet sub committee by Amber Rudd, EU workers will get a visa provided they have a skilled job to go to in the UK. Tourists and students would still have free access post Brexit. That is the basis of the immigration deal the UK government will offer the EU in return for a trade deal of some form
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3839154/EU-workers-visa-skilled-job.html
    Is picking broccoli in the fens a skilled job? Or egg packing?
    Well we can get some of the Leavers to get off their backsides and do those
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154
    Lord Mandelson looking crest-fallen on Newsnight.

    Brexit, the gift that keeps on giving.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 59,018
    SeanT said:
    Cameron having two lumps of sugar in his tea rather than one would have also been sufficient grounds. :smiley:
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,300
    edited March 2017

    Lord Mandelson looking crest-fallen on Newsnight.

    Brexit, the gift that keeps on giving.

    Metaphor for newsnight...A has been.

    Coming after the big guest....Nicola sturgeons biographer to tell us about sindy. I am presuming her hairdresser was busy.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    SeanT said:

    WTF is that? That's not a "spread". It's tragic.

    I would literally puke in the living face of some hotelier who tried to pass that off at an opening night. I would horizontally vomit into their eyes, pre-emptively, until they went blind.

    It's all we can afford "post Brexit"...
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,145
    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:
    WTF is that? That's not a "spread". It's tragic.

    I would literally puke in the living face of some hotelier who tried to pass that off at an opening night. I would horizontally vomit into their eyes, pre-emptively, until they went blind.
    Out of curiosity what meltdowns have you undergone in the face of a bad restaurant or hotel experience ?
  • Options
    CyanCyan Posts: 1,262
    HYUFD said:

    Cyan said:

    HYUFD said:

    Pong said:

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-nireland-idUKKBN16K28E

    "Northern Ireland's largest Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein on Monday said it wanted a referendum on splitting from the United Kingdom "as soon as possible", hours after Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon demanded a new independence vote."

    Yes, well unlike the SNP they do not have a majority at Stormont so tough
    The SNP don't have a majority at Holyrood. Take another look!
    They do with the Greens and the Greens back independence, that is a completely different prospect to Stormont where neither SF nor SF+SDLP have a majority or indeed Cardiff where PC are not only not the largest party but have no allies for independence either
    From the Scottish Greens' manifesto:

    "In assessing public appetite for a second referendum we will respect new kinds of citizen-led initiatives - for example, a call for a referendum signed by up to 1 million people on the electoral register."
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,913
    So if we Brexit and Scotland leave, I wonder whether Leavers here will see that as a good result. I imagine many will love the idea of a Balkan Britain.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,238
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    what she backs is a job offer requirement on immigration

    Given the number of times you post this perhaps you can point to a quote where she said it?
    It has already been put to a Cabinet sub committee by Amber Rudd, EU workers will get a visa provided they have a skilled job to go to in the UK. Tourists and students would still have free access post Brexit. That is the basis of the immigration deal the UK government will offer the EU in return for a trade deal of some form
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3839154/EU-workers-visa-skilled-job.html
    Is picking broccoli in the fens a skilled job? Or egg packing?
    Well we can get some of the Leavers to get off their backsides and do those
    Farmers need people who are actually going to get out of bed you know...
  • Options
    I think they've misinterpreted the PB/Polling Matters poll.

    They've taken the Scottish sub-sample from the GB wide poll.

    I've dropped Adam from Opinium a message to confirm that they haven't done any Scotland only Indyref polling.
This discussion has been closed.