Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » New YouGov polling finds that Corbyn has lost his LAB membe

SystemSystem Posts: 11,693
edited July 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » New YouGov polling finds that Corbyn has lost his LAB members’ lifeline. He now looks doomed

Above are some of the key findings from a new YouGov poll of LAB party members – the very people that Corbyn is looking to to help keep him in his job.

Read the full story here


«13456711

Comments

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    First, like May!
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    I call to order an emergency session of the PB Tories 4 Corbyn association!
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Well done Rob! First at last! :)
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    nunu said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Well done Rob! First at last! :)
    Where's peter? He can attest I have been first many times before, much to his chagrin. :D
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    RobD said:

    nunu said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Well done Rob! First at last! :)
    Where's peter? He can attest I have been first many times before, much to his chagrin. :D
    Didn't you once have TSE give u a heads up he was going to make a new thread so that u can be first. Sad. ;)
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    nunu said:

    RobD said:

    nunu said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Well done Rob! First at last! :)
    Where's peter? He can attest I have been first many times before, much to his chagrin. :D
    Didn't you once have TSE give u a heads up he was going to make a new thread so that u can be first. Sad. ;)
    With a prize so lucrative, can you blame me? :p
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    Tim_B said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
    Are the BBC still doing that, after firing Clarkson, or is it a separate venture?
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,151
    The left need to move on and run Clive Lewis. WTF are they thinking?
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    RobD said:

    Tim_B said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
    Are the BBC still doing that, after firing Clarkson, or is it a separate venture?
    I think it is Netflix
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    Off-topic:

    We have discussed driverless cars and automated driving many times in the past..
    The driver of a Tesla car died in Florida in May after colliding with a lorry.
    Under scrutiny is Tesla's Autopilot feature, which automatically changes lanes and reacts to traffic.

    In a statement, Tesla said it appeared the Model S car was unable to recognise "the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky" that had driven across the car's path."
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36680043

    RIP.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Off-topic:

    We have discussed driverless cars and automated driving many times in the past..

    The driver of a Tesla car died in Florida in May after colliding with a lorry.
    Under scrutiny is Tesla's Autopilot feature, which automatically changes lanes and reacts to traffic.

    In a statement, Tesla said it appeared the Model S car was unable to recognise "the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky" that had driven across the car's path."
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36680043

    RIP.

    Sad.

    Good to see you back amongst the insommniacs and expats of PB mornings.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    edited July 2016

    Sad.

    Good to see you back amongst the insommniacs and expats of PB mornings.

    Thanks. It's been a good week. :)

    Edit: and to be frank, what political anorak could miss the last week? Missteps, mistakes and mishaps all round!
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    edited July 2016
    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    Moses_ said:

    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)

    There is a big difference between a Labour member and a Labour voter. That's why Corbyn is in charge.

  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited July 2016
    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    This looks to me like Corbyn is safe. There's no candidate who can beat him. All he needs is one more vote than anyone else and he's fine. This is the hard left we are talking about. They are not going to give up their chance to destroy Labour under any circumstances. Only when the bourgeois, decadent, pro-capitalist entity that currently exists is wiped out can a new extra-parliamentary, proletarian movement rise up and seize power from the ruling classes. This is genuinely how Corbyn, McDonnell, Milne etc think.
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,981
    Moses_ said:

    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)

    You've fallen for the Corbynite fallacy: equating the views of Labour members with those of Labour voters.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,783

    Moses_ said:

    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)

    There is a big difference between a Labour member and a Labour voter. That's why Corbyn is in charge.

    Labour 'members' are London centric......and at this rate, Labour 'voters' will end up that way too.....
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    One of the reasons I'm probably (*) going to join the Lib Dems, or at least am seriously considering it. They were good in the coalition government IMO, and seem a saner alternative vote in England to either Labour or the Greens.

    As a side-point, a slight issue that has stopped me joining is their website. You go to it at http://www.libdems.org.uk/, click on the 'become a member' button, and it takes you to a form that asks for personal information *before* telling you the cost. I haven't progressed past that form as I don't want personal information in their system in case I find the cost is too high. (**)

    https://libdems.secure.force.com/LiberalDemocrats/NewMemberRegistration

    That sort of thing really annoys me. The cost should be visible on either the front page or the 'become a member' page. The Greens (***), Conservatives and Labour get this right.

    https://join.labour.org.uk/
    https://www.conservatives.com/join
    https://my.greenparty.org.uk/civicrm/membership/joining

    It'd be nice to think the power of PB would get this changed. ;)

    (*) Perhaps in the same way I was 'probably' going to vote Leave. Ahem.
    (**) Yes, I found the cost elsewhere - £12 a year. It's still a poor thing for them to do.
    (***) The Greens front page is hideously green. Terrible web design.
  • Options
    paulyork64paulyork64 Posts: 2,461

    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.

    But are the latest batch of £3ers more from the ABC camp?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.

    But are the latest batch of £3ers more from the ABC camp?

    They can be rustled up at a moment's notice. Corbyn is as safe as houses.

  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    Further to my earlier post on the Tesla crash, ArsTechnica has (as usual) excellent comment below the line.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/06/tesla-autopilot-fatal-crash-nhtsa-investigation

    An this earlier crash might indicate the sensors *may* have blind spots for high obstructions;
    https://www.ksl.com/?sid=39727592&nid=148&title=utah-man-says-tesla-car-started-on-its-own-crashed-into-trailer

    As an aside, there're going to be future issues with Tesla (and other manufacturers) having first dibs on the data from cars when there are crashes.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The current Labour leadership are going to need to be dragged out of office and their fingers will need to be peeled off the door frame. The state of the party afterwards is not something that concerns them.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054

    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.

    But are the latest batch of £3ers more from the ABC camp?

    They can be rustled up at a moment's notice. Corbyn is as safe as houses.
    Can we be sure all the £3ers actually exist? What verification is done?
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Further to my earlier post on the Tesla crash, ArsTechnica has (as usual) excellent comment below the line.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/06/tesla-autopilot-fatal-crash-nhtsa-investigation

    An this earlier crash might indicate the sensors *may* have blind spots for high obstructions;
    https://www.ksl.com/?sid=39727592&nid=148&title=utah-man-says-tesla-car-started-on-its-own-crashed-into-trailer

    As an aside, there're going to be future issues with Tesla (and other manufacturers) having first dibs on the data from cars when there are crashes.

    While Beta testing is clearly needed, I am not terribly keen to volunteer!

  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919
    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    edited July 2016

    The current Labour leadership are going to need to be dragged out of office and their fingers will need to be peeled off the door frame. The state of the party afterwards is not something that concerns them.

    Precisely, though it's more accurate to say that the state of the party does not bother them full stop. Labour must be destroyed before it can be rebuilt - taken from Parliament, put out onto the streets. No more bourgeois representative democracy, but direct action. That is the only way to secure the dictatorship of the proletariat. From chaos the workers will emerge triumphant. Seamus Milne learned all this at Winchester.

  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919
    MTimT said:

    RobD said:

    Tim_B said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
    Are the BBC still doing that, after firing Clarkson, or is it a separate venture?
    I think it is Netflix
    Amazon Prime for the Clarkson, May and Hammond show 'The Geand Tour'
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054

    Further to my earlier post on the Tesla crash, ArsTechnica has (as usual) excellent comment below the line.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/06/tesla-autopilot-fatal-crash-nhtsa-investigation

    An this earlier crash might indicate the sensors *may* have blind spots for high obstructions;
    https://www.ksl.com/?sid=39727592&nid=148&title=utah-man-says-tesla-car-started-on-its-own-crashed-into-trailer

    As an aside, there're going to be future issues with Tesla (and other manufacturers) having first dibs on the data from cars when there are crashes.

    While Beta testing is clearly needed, I am not terribly keen to volunteer!
    You've never come across as a crash-test dummy!
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320
    edited July 2016
    Moses_ said:

    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)

    There are very few Labour members left in the Valleys. That's because the current members are colossal members that even tribal Labour voters dislike.

    This is one reason why I foresee a Labour implosion in Wales. There seems a real possibility that at the next election they lose ten poor seats in the Valleys and gain wealthy Cardiff North. Which would speak volumes for what Labour has become!
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    Morning all.

    I think the bods on ITV3 just said Andrea Leadsom is going to be on at 7:10am.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320
    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    If there is an election it's very tempting to pay £3 and vote for the other candidate if it's someone who could pass for sane.

    That let's out Clive 'back end of a goat' Lewis, but I'd vote for Owen Smith. Even though I think he's a dud, he's less of a dud than the Jezziah.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    ydoethur said:

    Moses_ said:

    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)

    There are very few Labour members left in the Valleys. That's because the current members are colossal members that even tribal Labour voters dislike.

    This is one reason why I foresee a Labour implosion in Wales. There seems a real possibility that at the next election they lose ten poor seats in the Valleys and gain wealthy Cardiff North. Which would speak volumes for what Labour has become!
    I was hoping to see that last year in Mr Kinnock's seat, but he won easily. So I'll believe it when I see it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberavon_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    As a matter of interest, is there something preventing someone from being a member of two or more political parties at once?
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Tosh. The good times are coming. The CANZUK alliance will likely head an intergalactic empire by the end of the century.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    As a matter of interest, is there something preventing someone from being a member of two or more political parties at once?

    I think if they find out, they can expel you. But I don't see why they'd bother trying to find out.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919

    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.

    But are the latest batch of £3ers more from the ABC camp?

    They can be rustled up at a moment's notice. Corbyn is as safe as houses.
    Can we be sure all the £3ers actually exist? What verification is done?
    Not enough to stop various children, pets, unsympathetic journalists and members of other parties from signing up last time. They did manage to find a few Tory councillors and even an MP though.
  • Options
    BromptonautBromptonaut Posts: 1,113
    edited July 2016

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    One of the reasons I'm probably (*) going to join the Lib Dems, or at least am seriously considering it. They were good in the coalition government IMO, and seem a saner alternative vote in England to either Labour or the Greens.

    As a side-point, a slight issue that has stopped me joining is their website. You go to it at http://www.libdems.org.uk/, click on the 'become a member' button, and it takes you to a form that asks for personal information *before* telling you the cost. I haven't progressed past that form as I don't want personal information in their system in case I find the cost is too high. (**)

    https://libdems.secure.force.com/LiberalDemocrats/NewMemberRegistration

    That sort of thing really annoys me. The cost should be visible on either the front page or the 'become a member' page. The Greens (***), Conservatives and Labour get this right.

    https://join.labour.org.uk/
    https://www.conservatives.com/join
    https://my.greenparty.org.uk/civicrm/membership/joining

    It'd be nice to think the power of PB would get this changed. ;)

    (*) Perhaps in the same way I was 'probably' going to vote Leave. Ahem.
    (**) Yes, I found the cost elsewhere - £12 a year. It's still a poor thing for them to do.
    (***) The Greens front page is hideously green. Terrible web design.
    It's on the FAQ page - not exactly hidden away!

    I'm also thinking of joining, I've voted Lab/SDP/LD and Green at various times but always felt the LDs are closest to my core values.

    The Brexit vote, Farron's clear and honourable response and the steady march of Labour into the wilderness pretty much are doing it for me.
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    MTimT said:

    RobD said:

    Tim_B said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
    Are the BBC still doing that, after firing Clarkson, or is it a separate venture?
    I think it is Netflix
    Amazon Prime
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    If there is an election it's very tempting to pay £3 and vote for the other candidate if it's someone who could pass for sane.

    That let's out Clive 'back end of a goat' Lewis, but I'd vote for Owen Smith. Even though I think he's a dud, he's less of a dud than the Jezziah.

    Now, more than any other time that I can remember, the country needs an opposition. People who pay £3 to vote for Corbyn in order to scupper Labour are playing pathetic party politics precisly when the government should be subjected to the most intense scrutiny, as it negotiates a deal that will shape our future and even whether the UK will continue to exist. On the other hand, paying £3 to vote against Corbyn would be the act of a patriot. I would urge as many people as possible to do it. :-)

  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    The current Labour leadership are going to need to be dragged out of office and their fingers will need to be peeled off the door frame. The state of the party afterwards is not something that concerns them.

    Precisely, though it's more accurate to say that the state of the party does not bother them full stop. Labour must be destroyed before it can be rebuilt - taken from Parliament, put out onto the streets. No more bourgeois representative democracy, but direct action. That is the only way to secure the dictatorship of the proletariat. From chaos the workers will emerge triumphant. Seamus Milne learned all this at Winchester.

    Anyone who makes plans for after the revolution is a reactionary.

    Mikhail Bakunin
    Read more at: http://mobile.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/m/mikhailbak383410.html
  • Options
    MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Good morning all. Anything on? No! Then I'm going back to bed.

    One of the perks of being an OAP. ;)
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,101

    As a matter of interest, is there something preventing someone from being a member of two or more political parties at once?

    I think if they find out, they can expel you. But I don't see why they'd bother trying to find out.
    They tried to expel people from other parties voting for Corbyn last time.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11815777/Labour-purge-is-deliberate-attempt-by-party-to-stop-Jeremy-Corbyn-winning-former-MP-claims.html
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    As a matter of interest, is there something preventing someone from being a member of two or more political parties at once?

    Honesty. Not sure about how it works elsewhere, but Labour members are not allowed to be members of other parties.

  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited July 2016
    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130

    As a matter of interest, is there something preventing someone from being a member of two or more political parties at once?

    Honesty. Not sure about how it works elsewhere, but Labour members are not allowed to be members of other parties.

    Ditto the Conservatives.
  • Options
    paulyork64paulyork64 Posts: 2,461

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    One of the reasons I'm probably (*) going to join the Lib Dems, or at least am seriously considering it. They were good in the coalition government IMO, and seem a saner alternative vote in England to either Labour or the Greens.

    As a side-point, a slight issue that has stopped me joining is their website. You go to it at http://www.libdems.org.uk/, click on the 'become a member' button, and it takes you to a form that asks for personal information *before* telling you the cost. I haven't progressed past that form as I don't want personal information in their system in case I find the cost is too high. (**)

    https://libdems.secure.force.com/LiberalDemocrats/NewMemberRegistration

    That sort of thing really annoys me. The cost should be visible on either the front page or the 'become a member' page. The Greens (***), Conservatives and Labour get this right.

    https://join.labour.org.uk/
    https://www.conservatives.com/join
    https://my.greenparty.org.uk/civicrm/membership/joining

    It'd be nice to think the power of PB would get this changed. ;)

    (*) Perhaps in the same way I was 'probably' going to vote Leave. Ahem.
    (**) Yes, I found the cost elsewhere - £12 a year. It's still a poor thing for them to do.
    (***) The Greens front page is hideously green. Terrible web design.
    It's on the FAQ page - not exactly hidden away!

    I'm also thinking of joining, I've voted Lab/SDP/LD and Green at various times but always felt the LDs are closest to my core values.

    The Brexit vote, Farron's clear and honourable response and the steady march of Labour into the wilderness pretty much are doing it for me.
    Im instinctively a tory but i did quite like the coalition and hope it gets seen in a better light for the LDs as time passes, not just viewed as betrayal and a power trip for clegg.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919
    edited July 2016

    Further to my earlier post on the Tesla crash, ArsTechnica has (as usual) excellent comment below the line.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/06/tesla-autopilot-fatal-crash-nhtsa-investigation

    An this earlier crash might indicate the sensors *may* have blind spots for high obstructions;
    https://www.ksl.com/?sid=39727592&nid=148&title=utah-man-says-tesla-car-started-on-its-own-crashed-into-trailer

    As an aside, there're going to be future issues with Tesla (and other manufacturers) having first dibs on the data from cars when there are crashes.

    Very interesting. It was obviously always going to happen, and the key will be how liability works out with Tesla and the various insurance companies involved - especially in the litigation happy culture of the US.

    In my mind a semi-autonomous car is the worst of all worlds, allowing the driver to distract himself while still requiring his attention at a second's notice. There's lots of research going on in aviation now regarding this "automation dependency" leading to a lack of basic skills on the day they're suddenly required. See Air France 447 and Air Asia 8501 for details. It's actually worse in a car, because the time between the autopilot saying "you have control" and the accident may only be a second or two, whereas at 40,000' it's usually at least a couple of minutes.

    I'll get an autonomous car when it can drop me at the office door then go and park itself, before being called to pick me up from the pub after dinner and drinks.
  • Options
    FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    POJWAS.

    Where is Big John Owls?
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.
    The SKY temperature map showed 45 degrees in Kuwait today. If you're looking for misery, Kuwait could be your spot!

  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130
    Sandpit said:

    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.

    But are the latest batch of £3ers more from the ABC camp?

    They can be rustled up at a moment's notice. Corbyn is as safe as houses.
    Can we be sure all the £3ers actually exist? What verification is done?
    Not enough to stop various children, pets, unsympathetic journalists and members of other parties from signing up last time. They did manage to find a few Tory councillors and even an MP though.
    But the dogs got through....
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.

    Yep, as self-inflicted wounds go this is a big one. It is, of course, why Corbyn and the hard left were so keen on Brexit. The more the proletariat suffers, the more radicalised it becomes. Victory will be won on the streets, not in Parliament.

    As for emigration. It's not for me. I'd expect at least one of my kids to head off though. The time I spent living abroad was incredibly enriching and eye-opening. It changed me completely.

  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,723
    Last night's by-election results. Great for LibDem, bad for UKIP and Con. Bad for Lab except Bexley.

    Britain Elects ‏@britainelects 7h7 hours ago
    Leatherhead North (Mole Valley) result:
    LDEM: 56.6% (+27.4)
    CON: 22.3% (-11.7)
    UKIP: 10.3% (-7.9)
    LAB: 8.9% (-5.7)
    GRN: 1.8% (-2.1)

    Britain Elects ‏@britainelects 7h7 hours ago
    St Michael's (Bexley) result:
    CON: 37.4% (+2.7)
    LAB: 33.5% (+11.5)
    UKIP: 18.2% (-14.7)
    LDEM: 4.7% (+4.7)
    BNP: 4.2% (-6.3)
    GRN: 2.2% (+2.2)

    Britain Elects ‏@britainelects 7h7 hours ago
    High Town (Luton) result:
    LAB: 39.7% (-13.4)
    GRN: 21.5% (+3.8)
    LDEM: 14.2% (+14.2)
    CON: 11.1% (-18.1)
    IND: 8.0% (+8.0)
    UKIP: 5.4% (+5.4)

  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    "A flashpoint also developed between Gove and Johnson over whether Boris should give George Osborne a top job in his Cabinet.

    As the Chancellor’s old friend, Mr Gove was desperate to bring him on board their operation and bombarded Mr Osborne with texts and calls last weekend.

    But the Chancellor wanted to wait to see how the race played out, and Boris had no intention of offering his old rival anything anyway."

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1371058/inside-story-of-tories-borexit-how-bojos-career-was-left-in-tatters-a-week-after-he-thought-hed-be-next-pm/

    Looks like Gove + Osborne is a thing. Vote anyone-but-gove!
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,723
    Tim_B said:

    MTimT said:

    RobD said:

    Tim_B said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
    Are the BBC still doing that, after firing Clarkson, or is it a separate venture?
    I think it is Netflix
    Amazon Prime
    Top Gear is BBC
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.

    NZ is wonderful if you have a bit of money. The top of the South Island around Nelson - where my brother lives - is paradise. Doctors and others working in essential professions have it all. But it's a tough place to build a future in if you don't have such skills. Lots of kiwis emigrate to Australia these days, I think.

  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919

    Sandpit said:

    You also need to throw the £3ers into the mix. I suspect they were not polled as they are much harder to identify.

    Corbyn is safe. Labour is finished. The hard left has won.

    But are the latest batch of £3ers more from the ABC camp?

    They can be rustled up at a moment's notice. Corbyn is as safe as houses.
    Can we be sure all the £3ers actually exist? What verification is done?
    Not enough to stop various children, pets, unsympathetic journalists and members of other parties from signing up last time. They did manage to find a few Tory councillors and even an MP though.
    But the dogs got through....
    Of course, a quick Google didn't turn up anything unnusual.

    The one good thing they did last time was to have the local associations do the vetting - turned up a load of people that they knew didn't support the Labour Party that wouldn't have come up otherwise such as local activists for other parties. They don't have the Tory membership list though.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,320

    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    If there is an election it's very tempting to pay £3 and vote for the other candidate if it's someone who could pass for sane.

    That let's out Clive 'back end of a goat' Lewis, but I'd vote for Owen Smith. Even though I think he's a dud, he's less of a dud than the Jezziah.

    Now, more than any other time that I can remember, the country needs an opposition. People who pay £3 to vote for Corbyn in order to scupper Labour are playing pathetic party politics precisly when the government should be subjected to the most intense scrutiny, as it negotiates a deal that will shape our future and even whether the UK will continue to exist. On the other hand, paying £3 to vote against Corbyn would be the act of a patriot. I would urge as many people as possible to do it. :-)

    The candidate I would genuinely join to vote for, rather than merely to hurt Jez, would be Jon Cruddas. Is there any chance he might finally be persuaded to put himself forward?
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,027

    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.
    The SKY temperature map showed 45 degrees in Kuwait today. If you're looking for misery, Kuwait could be your spot!

    Housing in NZ is expensive, particularly around Auckland. In NZ money, of course. Having said that a much younger cousin asked my advice about emigrating there 12 or so years ago. I advised to go, he did and he’s never looked back.
    I wisj I’d gone 60 years ago!
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095

    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.
    The SKY temperature map showed 45 degrees in Kuwait today. If you're looking for misery, Kuwait could be your spot!

    The lack of culture would do my head in.. all those sheep and only NZ rugby to watch as a sport.. naah.. its on my bucket list to visit before I pop my clogs though
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054

    It's on the FAQ page - not exactly hidden away!

    I'm also thinking of joining, I've voted Lab/SDP/LD and Green at various times but always felt the LDs are closest to my core values.

    The Brexit vote, Farron's clear and honourable response and the steady march of Labour into the wilderness pretty much are doing it for me.

    It should be on the first page you click on the first joining page, as it is for the other three parties mentioned.

    I have an aversion from webpages and stores that make me enter personal information *before* I know vital information. I'm not the only one, and I guess would-be Lib Dems are likely to be similarly careful with their private information.

    I have just entered some false information on the first page (sorry Lib Dems, but Test House does not exist in the city of Test), and the next page gives you a series of prices for different options. Those options should be on the first page.

    It's also seems inconsistent: from the FAQ: "Membership costs £12 a year - but we hope that you might consider donating a little more. You can join online by paying with either a credit/debit card or direct debit, and will have the option to choose how much you pay there."

    Yet the webform second page defaults to £25 with the text: "We recommend an annual subscription £70, but you can join for as little as £12 (£6 for students/claimants). It's your choice."

    Messy. So very, very messy.
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669

    Tim_B said:

    MTimT said:

    RobD said:

    Tim_B said:

    RobD said:

    First, like May!

    Speaking of May, he appears in neither of the two promos I have seen for the Grand Tour. The first one was Clarkson trying to assemble a DHL cardboard box.The second was Clarkson and Hammond sitting at a table inviting folks to the first studio filming in South Africa in July, unless you are a moron or drive a Peugeot.

    Both were considerably funnier than the new Top Gear - keep Sabine, keep Matt and ditch the rest of them.
    Are the BBC still doing that, after firing Clarkson, or is it a separate venture?
    I think it is Netflix
    Amazon Prime
    Top Gear is BBC
    The now utterly dreadful Flop Gear is BBC, but The Grand Tour -Hammond, Clarkson and May - is Amazon Prime. The first studio episode is being shot in a couple of weeks in Jo'burg.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,050
    edited July 2016

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.

    Yep, as self-inflicted wounds go this is a big one. It is, of course, why Corbyn and the hard left were so keen on Brexit. The more the proletariat suffers, the more radicalised it becomes. Victory will be won on the streets, not in Parliament.

    As for emigration. It's not for me. I'd expect at least one of my kids to head off though. The time I spent living abroad was incredibly enriching and eye-opening. It changed me completely.

    I've been speaking to a couple of my Corbyn buddies. I couldn't help but draw the similarities to the Brexiters- both groups filled by zealous, dangerous ideologues, who seek to destroy this country with their nihilistic ideology for some spurious, ill conceived gain. They are welcome to each other.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919

    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.
    The SKY temperature map showed 45 degrees in Kuwait today. If you're looking for misery, Kuwait could be your spot!

    And it will be 45 or higher every day until the end of September. Humid too. Every time summer comes around you forget how bad it was last year, when you walk outside and your sunglasses steam up, when a two minute walk from your car to the office makes your shirt wet and your face sweaty.

    Winter's great though! :)
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    If there is an election it's very tempting to pay £3 and vote for the other candidate if it's someone who could pass for sane.

    That let's out Clive 'back end of a goat' Lewis, but I'd vote for Owen Smith. Even though I think he's a dud, he's less of a dud than the Jezziah.

    Now, more than any other time that I can remember, the country needs an opposition. People who pay £3 to vote for Corbyn in order to scupper Labour are playing pathetic party politics precisly when the government should be subjected to the most intense scrutiny, as it negotiates a deal that will shape our future and even whether the UK will continue to exist. On the other hand, paying £3 to vote against Corbyn would be the act of a patriot. I would urge as many people as possible to do it. :-)

    The candidate I would genuinely join to vote for, rather than merely to hurt Jez, would be Jon Cruddas. Is there any chance he might finally be persuaded to put himself forward?

    I doubt it. But with a new leader people like Cruddas will be freed up to sit on the shadow government benches. The country needs Labour's big bests - such as they are - to be holding the government to account. With Corbyn in charge that cannot happen. With any other likely leader it would.

  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130

    This looks to me like Corbyn is safe. There's no candidate who can beat him. All he needs is one more vote than anyone else and he's fine. This is the hard left we are talking about. They are not going to give up their chance to destroy Labour under any circumstances. Only when the bourgeois, decadent, pro-capitalist entity that currently exists is wiped out can a new extra-parliamentary, proletarian movement rise up and seize power from the ruling classes. This is genuinely how Corbyn, McDonnell, Milne etc think.

    You'd think that maybe, just maybe, on one of the near 18,000 mornings Corbyn has woken up since his student days, on one of them he might just have thought to himself

    "Hang on a minute. WHAT??? That is just so much bollocks..."
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Amongst the idiots there are some clever people on here, it never ceases to amaze me why they place so much faith in politicians, the last few weeks has proven that the vast majority have no concerns beyond self interest. Both main parties are rancid to the core, alleged friends knifing each other front and back, sycophants jockeying for position, it is nauseating.

    David Cameron must be the most relieved man in the world, looking on at the way our lawmakers conduct themselves. That said, he is a massive contributory factor in all this, he won't feel good about himself, and nor should he.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054

    Last night's by-election results. Great for LibDem, bad for UKIP and Con. Bad for Lab except Bexley.

    (Snip)

    I'm not sure you can spin those as 'great' for the Lib Dems. Leatherhead was good, but the other two evidently did not have LD candidates previously, and only got low percentages.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited July 2016
    Crick and Dorries say Osborne was behind Gove attacking Boris.

    https://twitter.com/NadineDorriesMP

    Vote anyone-but-gove!
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Not sure why anybody would expect Ukip to do well right now, the party is skint, rudderless and devoid of ideas beyond the EU.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    tyson said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.

    Yep, as self-inflicted wounds go this is a big one. It is, of course, why Corbyn and the hard left were so keen on Brexit. The more the proletariat suffers, the more radicalised it becomes. Victory will be won on the streets, not in Parliament.

    As for emigration. It's not for me. I'd expect at least one of my kids to head off though. The time I spent living abroad was incredibly enriching and eye-opening. It changed me completely.

    I've been speaking to a couple of my Corbyn buddies. I couldn't help but draw the similarities to the Brexiters- both groups filled by zealous, dangerous ideologues, who seek to destroy this country with their nihilistic ideology for some spurious, ill conceived gain. They are welcome to each other.

    And the rest of us have to live with it. This country is almost visibly diminishing day by day. Our reputation outside of right wing nationalist circles has been hugely damaged, while Carney made clear yesterday just how much economic harm we have inflicted on ourselves. And yet there is nothing there to hold the Tory Leavers to account. They are going to be hated, but will get away with it scot free.

  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,897

    Not sure why anybody would expect Ukip to do well right now, the party is skint, rudderless and devoid of ideas beyond the EU.

    Depends how angry people are about immigration and how they'll react if the Tories fail again on it. They weren't punished in 2015 admittedly.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    The left need to move on and run Clive Lewis. WTF are they thinking?

    Two thoughts:

    (1) Why would they? There is no mechanism - even without members support - that can force Corbyn to step down. I suppose the NEC could expel him from the party, but that would seem extreme. If there is a chance he/the left would lose, why would he go?

    (2) The 90/10 split of Remain voters looks fishy. I'd thought the Labour *voters* were close to 60/40. Now that could be (a) false recall (b) members are not representative of voters or (c) YouGov has an unbalanced sample. In any event you shouldn't just take at face value
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    They asked me :smiley: I thought it was a bit odd. The filter question at the beginning asked if I'd ever been a member of X Party - I answered honestly and said Tory and Labour. I wouldn't put too much store in this poll unless then removed responses like mine.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    Sandpit said:

    Further to my earlier post on the Tesla crash, ArsTechnica has (as usual) excellent comment below the line.

    http://arstechnica.co.uk/cars/2016/06/tesla-autopilot-fatal-crash-nhtsa-investigation

    An this earlier crash might indicate the sensors *may* have blind spots for high obstructions;
    https://www.ksl.com/?sid=39727592&nid=148&title=utah-man-says-tesla-car-started-on-its-own-crashed-into-trailer

    As an aside, there're going to be future issues with Tesla (and other manufacturers) having first dibs on the data from cars when there are crashes.

    Very interesting. It was obviously always going to happen, and the key will be how liability works out with Tesla and the various insurance companies involved - especially in the litigation happy culture of the US.

    In my mind a semi-autonomous car is the worst of all worlds, allowing the driver to distract himself while still requiring his attention at a second's notice. There's lots of research going on in aviation now regarding this "automation dependency" leading to a lack of basic skills on the day they're suddenly required. See Air France 447 and Air Asia 8501 for details. It's actually worse in a car, because the time between the autopilot saying "you have control" and the accident may only be a second or two, whereas at 40,000' it's usually at least a couple of minutes.

    I'll get an autonomous car when it can drop me at the office door then go and park itself, before being called to pick me up from the pub after dinner and drinks.
    That's a fair summary of my views.

    Edge and corner cases will abound, especially as the tech is not AI-complete.

    I'd also be concerned that much of this tech is being developed in the US, where driving conditions and roads are quite different.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    tyson said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.

    Yep, as self-inflicted wounds go this is a big one. It is, of course, why Corbyn and the hard left were so keen on Brexit. The more the proletariat suffers, the more radicalised it becomes. Victory will be won on the streets, not in Parliament.

    As for emigration. It's not for me. I'd expect at least one of my kids to head off though. The time I spent living abroad was incredibly enriching and eye-opening. It changed me completely.

    I've been speaking to a couple of my Corbyn buddies. I couldn't help but draw the similarities to the Brexiters- both groups filled by zealous, dangerous ideologues, who seek to destroy this country with their nihilistic ideology for some spurious, ill conceived gain. They are welcome to each other.

    And the rest of us have to live with it. This country is almost visibly diminishing day by day. Our reputation outside of right wing nationalist circles has been hugely damaged, while Carney made clear yesterday just how much economic harm we have inflicted on ourselves. And yet there is nothing there to hold the Tory Leavers to account. They are going to be hated, but will get away with it scot free.

    What has happened to you? Get a grip man ffs, you'll make yourself ill over nothing.

    Visibly diminishing day by day.

    Its like a 14 year old's poetry
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,897

    Last night's by-election results. Great for LibDem, bad for UKIP and Con. Bad for Lab except Bexley.

    (Snip)

    I'm not sure you can spin those as 'great' for the Lib Dems. Leatherhead was good, but the other two evidently did not have LD candidates previously, and only got low percentages.
    Looks like a very standard set of by elections, where a big swing agai st dny national picture just happens occasionally.

    Tribal politics is here to stay - it's hard to see, but the Tories are uniting and labour will find a way to pretend they are all fine.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,783

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Oh cheer up. We've seen the last (for a while at least) of the posh boy PMs and are heading for a sensible vicar's daughter - who won't stand any nonsense - ask the Police.....she's also been swift at dumping some baggage - pulling out of the EHCR for example....a year from now we could be looking back on this as a blessing in disguise....
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    tyson said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leaversteam, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.

    Yep, as self-inflicted wounds go this is a big one. It is, of course, why Corbyn and the hard left were so keen on Brexit. The more the proletariat suffers, the more radicalised it becomes. Victory will be won on the streets, not in Parliament.

    As for emigration. It's not for me. I'd expect at least one of my kids to head off though. The time I spent living abroad was incredibly enriching and eye-opening. It changed me completely.

    I've been speaking to a couple of my Corbyn buddies. I couldn't help but draw the similarities to the Brexiters- both groups filled by zealous, dangerous ideologues, who seek to destroy this country with their nihilistic ideology for some spurious, ill conceived gain. They are welcome to each other.

    And the rest of us have to live with it. This country is almost visibly diminishing day by day. Our reputation outside of right wing nationalist circles has been hugely damaged, while Carney made clear yesterday just how much economic harm we have inflicted on ourselves. And yet there is nothing there to hold the Tory Leavers to account. They are going to be hated, but will get away with it scot free.

    What has happened to you? Get a grip man ffs, you'll make yourself ill over nothing.

    Visibly diminishing day by day.

    Its like a 14 year old's poetry

    I wish it were. Sadly, it's not. Hopefully, we can get out of this mess we have created for ourselves.

  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,054
    kle4 said:

    Not sure why anybody would expect Ukip to do well right now, the party is skint, rudderless and devoid of ideas beyond the EU.

    Depends how angry people are about immigration and how they'll react if the Tories fail again on it. They weren't punished in 2015 admittedly.
    Possibly because the Tories had the EU to hide behind. Many voters would have said: "I have concerns about immigration (though I'm not obsessed, and that nice Polish man down the corner shop isn't a real immigrant). But it's all the EU's fault the government can't do more."

    That defence has now disappeared.
  • Options
    tysontyson Posts: 6,050
    The banking crisis destroyed our wealth by about 12%-15% from where it should have been you have to take the amount it fell (about 7%) and add the lack of growth (5-8%) in this period. It left us impoverished and facing years of austerity. The consequences...poverty, bedroom tax, massive cuts to public services, years of squeezed salaries.....

    Debt levels in 2008 were only about 40% of GDP. So, the Govt was able to borrow to offset the economic collapse.

    How much will Brexit destroy our wealth? Even it is something like half (I personally think more), the first Thatcher recession, entirely likely as business uncertainty and lack of investment will surely feed into the real economy and house prices tumble, how will the UK fare? But this time we are much weaker.
  • Options
    FishingFishing Posts: 4,561

    Housing in NZ is expensive, particularly around Auckland. In NZ money, of course. Having said that a much younger cousin asked my advice about emigrating there 12 or so years ago. I advised to go, he did and he’s never looked back.
    I wisj I’d gone 60 years ago!

    But I know somebody who emigrated there but was back a year later. He was bored out of his mind, despite being an outdoorsy person. And don't forget that there are more young Kiwis out of NZ than in it, or nearly so. Each to his own.

    Personally if I emigrated, it would be somewhere English-speaking and wealthy, with better weather. Which basically means Sydney or California.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Oh cheer up. We've seen the last (for a while at least) of the posh boy PMs and are heading for a sensible vicar's daughter - who won't stand any nonsense - ask the Police.....she's also been swift at dumping some baggage - pulling out of the EHCR for example....a year from now we could be looking back on this as a blessing in disguise....

    Next year is when the Brexit-inspired cuts will kick in.

  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    If there is an election it's very tempting to pay £3 and vote for the other candidate if it's someone who could pass for sane.

    That let's out Clive 'back end of a goat' Lewis, but I'd vote for Owen Smith. Even though I think he's a dud, he's less of a dud than the Jezziah.

    Now, more than any other time that I can remember, the country needs an opposition. People who pay £3 to vote for Corbyn in order to scupper Labour are playing pathetic party politics precisly when the government should be subjected to the most intense scrutiny, as it negotiates a deal that will shape our future and even whether the UK will continue to exist. On the other hand, paying £3 to vote against Corbyn would be the act of a patriot. I would urge as many people as possible to do it. :-)

    Disagree. Keeping Corbyn in place destroys the Labour Party.

    Longer term I think Britain would be healthier if it had a sane left party without the institutional links with the unions (they are legitimate interests, like many other organisations, but outrageous they should own and control one of the major political parties).

    Blow up Labour and there is a change that LD/SDP2 could become the main party of opposition.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited July 2016
    Leadsom coming up on on itv3 in a mo.

    EDIT
    Leadsom has landed.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130

    Not sure why anybody would expect Ukip to do well right now, the party is skint, rudderless and devoid of ideas beyond the EU.

    If you were a bright young SPAD wannabe, looking to get on in politics, would you even give UKIP a moments thought in your career path? They still strike me as a party that folks end up at after serious disillusionment with another party, rather than as a go-to party of choice. That in itself means they won't attract these bright young things who bring energy and ideas.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Tim_B said:

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Nuts - come on back home to Georgia: the weather's better and it's much cheaper.
    I have been canvassed for a job in NZ. Smallish city with good climate and the great outdoors on the doorstep.

    A bit too much sunshine and optimism for me, you can only stand so much of that cr@p!

    I like life with a bit of an edge and the possibility of misery. It is what keeps me here.
    The SKY temperature map showed 45 degrees in Kuwait today. If you're looking for misery, Kuwait could be your spot!

    The lack of culture would do my head in.. all those sheep and only NZ rugby to watch as a sport.. naah.. its on my bucket list to visit before I pop my clogs though
    It's like Dorset from the 1950s. Lovely place to visit but wouldn't want to live there.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,783

    On topic:

    I would like to see Corbyn go the same way he got in.

    Without being voted out by the membership there will always be a feeling of betrayal or stab in the back.

    If the membership re-elects Corbyn then it is the end of Labour as a potential alternative.government. We would have a defacto one party state, albeit one party with its own internal opposition.

    And at a time when the Tories are hugely vulnerable. The next Chancellor will be raising taxes and/or making even deeper spending cuts; while the Brexit deal is unlikely to bring immigration down in any significant way. What Tory Leavers promised voters is not going to happen. And Tory Leavers are likely to be a majority in May's cabinet. Can you imagine what a credible opposition could do with a Leave-dominated Treasury team, or defence team, or Home Office, or MoD? It would be open goal after open goal. Instead, Corbyn will give them a free pass and the green light to agree a Brexit deal that harms millions of ordinary people.

    I couldn't agree more. The future looks bleak.

    If I were younger, I would emigrate, but at my age I just have to put up with it as best that I can.
    Oh cheer up. We've seen the last (for a while at least) of the posh boy PMs and are heading for a sensible vicar's daughter - who won't stand any nonsense - ask the Police.....she's also been swift at dumping some baggage - pulling out of the EHCR for example....a year from now we could be looking back on this as a blessing in disguise....

    Next year is when the Brexit-inspired cuts will kick in.

    You write that as though 'living within our means' is a bad thing - and May junked the 'balance the books by 2020' yesterday as well.....
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,313

    Moses_ said:

    So all the Labour members voted remain. That's all a labour members except those members outside London, in the North east heartlands and errr ..... All of Wales except Cardiff which was a close vote anyway.

    Someone is telling porkies.

    (It was the Tories fault naturally....)

    There is a big difference between a Labour member and a Labour voter. That's why Corbyn is in charge.

    Labour 'members' are London centric......and at this rate, Labour 'voters' will end up that way too.....
    I can't remember what proportion of Labour members are in London, but it was publicised during the last leadership election and I remember being surprised at how high it was. Interestingly reflected by my impression of the general pattern of local by-election results; there are always local factors of course, but it does seem that Labour has few problems in the Capital but isn't doing that well everywhere else (tonight's results follow this pattern). And of course London, but few other parts of England, voted Remain.

    In politics as for some economic indicators, London appears to be going its own way.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    mrs May is now at 70% on that link two threads ago. looks like May v Leasdom.(17%)
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,919
    PlatoSaid said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    They asked me :smiley: I thought it was a bit odd. The filter question at the beginning asked if I'd ever been a member of X Party - I answered honestly and said Tory and Labour. I wouldn't put too much store in this poll unless then removed responses like mine.
    You were a £3 member last year, rather than a full member? Trying to understand how representative the poll is, or if it's little more than a voodoo poll because of sampling errors.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    @southam

    You get worse, for everyone other than a few hysterical berks on the internet life goes on as normal, albeit with a broader smile on our faces.

    A journo from something called Vice News rang me yesterday to say she'd heard the Jungle was moving from Calais to Dover. Has anybody ever heard such nonsense?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,937
    Charles said:

    ydoethur said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all. Another quiet day to come? ;)

    Do we know what type of Labour members were polled? Remember that there were four batches of members for the leadership election - the MPs and MEPs, the full party members, the union members and the £3 associate members. My guess would be that this poll only asked one of the four groups, and the second smallest group at that.

    If there is an election it's very tempting to pay £3 and vote for the other candidate if it's someone who could pass for sane.

    That let's out Clive 'back end of a goat' Lewis, but I'd vote for Owen Smith. Even though I think he's a dud, he's less of a dud than the Jezziah.

    Now, more than any other time that I can remember, the country needs an opposition. People who pay £3 to vote for Corbyn in order to scupper Labour are playing pathetic party politics precisly when the government should be subjected to the most intense scrutiny, as it negotiates a deal that will shape our future and even whether the UK will continue to exist. On the other hand, paying £3 to vote against Corbyn would be the act of a patriot. I would urge as many people as possible to do it. :-)

    Disagree. Keeping Corbyn in place destroys the Labour Party.

    Longer term I think Britain would be healthier if it had a sane left party without the institutional links with the unions (they are legitimate interests, like many other organisations, but outrageous they should own and control one of the major political parties).

    Blow up Labour and there is a change that LD/SDP2 could become the main party of opposition.

    Of course you disagree, you are a Tory. But the next few years are pivotal ones for the UK. Indeed, in five years there's a strong chance the UK won't exist. Leaving it all to the Tories, without subjecting them to the detailed scrutiny a credible opposition can provide, is a surefire way to get a poor outcome. That won't affect the establishment, but it will have an impact on millions of ordinary voters.

  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    Charles said:

    The left need to move on and run Clive Lewis. WTF are they thinking?

    Two thoughts:

    (1) Why would they? There is no mechanism - even without members support - that can force Corbyn to step down. I suppose the NEC could expel him from the party, but that would seem extreme. If there is a chance he/the left would lose, why would he go?

    (2) The 90/10 split of Remain voters looks fishy. I'd thought the Labour *voters* were close to 60/40. Now that could be (a) false recall (b) members are not representative of voters or (c) YouGov has an unbalanced sample. In any event you shouldn't just take at face value
    Very likely (b), mostly. The split of Labour MPs would be even more one-sided, wouldn't it?
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    This is on the BBC website, no idea why it makes me laugh so much but it does

    https://youtu.be/vM1pvax-OTk
This discussion has been closed.