That's a big move towards Remain from the money in the last 48 hours.
Some value in the 12/5 (3.4) now available for Leave, on the basis that it should get tighter at some point in the next two months?
For anyone who wants better returns than a savings account, there's £2800 available with Betfair at 1.01 on there being a referendum during this Parliament!
<55% turnout at 7.2 also some value? Does anyone so far think Labour are close to getting their vote out for Remain?</p>
It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)
The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.
True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
Can someone remind what the punters thought of the likelihood of a Conservative Majority, prior to the results of the GE last year?
Most of us, self included, were commenting on the value in the 1/8 available on NOM, during Election Day. It was around the Nuneaton declaration at 12:30am that it was realised that the majority might actually be on.
Interesting comments on the Guardian about Obama's c"back of the queue" words - most comments were pretty vehemently against him and a good chunk of those mentioned that it would of course be in the US's interests because of TTIP etc. Another good chunk said they hoped we would be in the back of the queue for any future US-led military actions.
I do wonder if Cameron has made a major blunder here in getting Obama to speak out so bluntly - I think he views the left and centre-left as all sewn up for Remain and all that is needed is to persuade Tory voters to swing to Remain. But, as we are all know, there is a good chunk of the left that views anything backed by the US with suspicion. Add into that mix the view that TTIP is a plot to allow US private providers to take over the NHS and the left-wing vote for Remain may not look so certain.
It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)
The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.
True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
Leave a rather begiinning to specialise in playing without a goalkeeper. First they say that we'll have no problem cutting shiny new trade deals outside of the EU only to be contradicted by Obama. Then they decide to combat that with their 'lame duck' President line leaving a gaping hole for Clinton to charge through. So they basically seem to be stuck with 'vote leave if you both want Trump to win and think he will win'!
And that's without actually knowing what stance Trump is going to take now he's looking to switch to act "Presidential"
Oh gods, I'm not sure I like, well, liking a Ted Cruz comment (though personally I'm not incandescent with rage about Obama and Hillary saying what they did, more disappointed how much Leavers have reacted to it)
It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)
The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.
True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
Leave a rather begiinning to specialise in playing without a goalkeeper. First they say that we'll have no problem cutting shiny new trade deals outside of the EU only to be contradicted by Obama. Then they decide to combat that with their 'lame duck' President line leaving a gaping hole for Clinton to charge through. So they basically seem to be stuck with 'vote leave if you both want Trump to win and think he will win'!
Obama said what his host (Cameron) asked him to say.
It doesn't add much to the arguments.
The US will do a deal if it's in their interests to do so. Which it will be. Speeches today notwithstanding.
Interesting comments on the Guardian about Obama's c"back of the queue" words - most comments were pretty vehemently against him
Well that's it. If Ciffers don't like it, the game is over.
Or not
Not saying that - just saying his comments seems to have stirred up something of a hornet's nest and that many are attacking Obama's comments from a left-wing standpoint. Hillary's intervention will not help on that score either, as she is also viewed with suspicion.
As I said, the general consensus has been that the left-wing vote is in the bag for Remain - Obama may have upset that equation with what he said.
That's a model answer on how to respond to questions of another country's politics. Well done Ted Cruz, which is not something I think I've ever said before!!
Sorry to bang on about the London elections, but I was very grateful to Nick Palmer for giving his view on what is happening in the Labour party, stating that there is lots going on.
According to me red sources, apparently, Labour do have as many events as any London campaign but less activists are turning out. Also, they claim their vote is down, but I can't work out if that is versus the last Mayoral, 4 years ago or at the GE in 2015.
Clearly, if the latter, turnout will be about half, so of course their vote is down. If it is down versus 2012, then we Tories will be happy.
Re; Mayoralty, Labour have gone from quiet confidence to arrogance, Sadiq has won, absolute 100% certainty they say. So, they may be a smidgeon of value on the day if Zac drifts to a silly figure like 10 to 1. Zac still has a chance if Tories turn out and the quiet voters turn out too. Remember the GE. There's a chance.
For Assembly Member elections, we are in the dark. One senior Labour man told me that they might lose Brent & Harrow. F*ck me, if true, that is amazing. Therefore there might be a bet there, a fiver or so. Labour also claim they are struggling in Barnet & Camden and Ealing & Hillingdon. But they feel strong in North-east. The trouble with all this chat, is that the data is small in figures and lots of hearsay. On the other hand, the polls were great for Labour, but they didn't change their confidence/arrogance monitor. They (& Tories) are only reading their own data, the polls are too volatile.
According to BF GO is less likely to be next PM than Corbyn.
Interesting...
I'm positioned against that nonsense anyway, but as I don't really believe GO will be next PM, and that I've no great wish to tie up funds waiting on Corbyn to self-identify with the tit-he-is I'm not piling in.
My money, as I think I've said before, is on Rees-Mogg! (Fun market in the odd fiver)
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I think it'll be hilarious if Gove or IDS and the other Tory Leavers come out again and say they still think Cameron is the bestest guy evar and should lead the negotiations for Leave.
It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)
The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.
True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
There are merits to LIFO?
Weirdly i just answered a query posted later than yours.
Which makes this response a) an answer to your query, b) an example of the phenomenon, and c) recursive to boot.
And now if you'll forgive me, I have to go do some work
I'm struggling to see the Tories still being in with a chance though. Ed M clearly didn't inspire people to vote for him in droves nationally, but Khan seems to have the Corbynite crowd on site, without any first preference being syphoned off by Galloway, without putting off the rest of Labour voters who might otherwise stay at home as well, so will presumably maximise the Labour support, particularly since the Tories are internally divided at the moment, the LDs nowhere, and Zac being no Boris.
I'll happily admit I know little of London, but from the outside it's looking like Labour arrogance is well founded on this one.
No British politician advocates the way Americans should vote after all.
Assuming other US political candidates stay clear then good for them, and bad for those that seem unable to do so.
Are we betting without Donald Trump? "'Divisive, stupid and wrong" -- D Cameron.
Well.. a good point (I don't know the context of that quote. When was it?). Cameron shouldn't have commented if Trump was in any way at the time running for office.
The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat
Oh dear.
Someone needs to give the Leave campaign a massive kick in the arse. They need to stick to the Goves, Hannans, Hoeys and a couple of kippers, letting the Boris's and Nigels loose to shout their mouths off on the front pages really aren't helping the cause one little bit.
It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)
The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.
True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
There are merits to LIFO?
Weirdly i just answered a query posted later than yours.
Which makes this response a) an answer to your query, b) an example of the phenomenon, and c) recursive to boot.
And now if you'll forgive me, I have to go do some work
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
Am I imagining it or has Cameron been resorting to comfort eating to assuage the stress of the referendum? He seems decidedly podgy in recent photos.
Maybe a little, but I don't think it's very noticeable - I think he tends to fluctuate quite a bit on the weight side in any case, so might just be at the plump end of his personal spectrum right now.
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
Plenty of time left for the narrative to change. The big cards have surely been played, and now it's for the long long grind to the end for Leave to chip away at.
I can only conclude that he is passionately europhile, on a scale that makes Ken Clarke look like Nige Farage. Which also means he is a fraud and a liar.
That penny dropped for me with the non-negotiation, negotiation fiasco.
He's a fake, a liar, a fraud. a bully and a complete and utter waste of space!
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
Maybe we ought to be grateful that they care.
It really has been a 'nuclear' option by the US so you have to assume they really believe in the UK in the EU. Wonder how leave will accuse Cameron of writing Clinton's speech
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
Plenty of time left for the narrative to change. The big cards have surely been played, and now it's for the long long grind to the end for Leave to chip away at.
The narrative has been set by remain very early in the campaign and I believe it has taken leave completely by surprise
I can only conclude that he is passionately europhile, on a scale that makes Ken Clarke look like Nige Farage.
He just passionately detests the Eurosceptic wing of his own party and sees this as a one-off opportunity to bury them. Unfortunately he's only feeding the resentment.
I only hope the referendum result is so decisive that the losing side has to accept the result with good grace, whatever opinion they have of the way the campaign was fought.
Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?
Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.
Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.
If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.
Perhaps Boris is playing the "long game"?
Let Osborne become leader. Osborne proves to be even more toxic and useless than El Gord. Tories defeated heavily in 2020 with Osborne humiliated (hey a guy can dream) Boris comes in and saves the day.
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?
Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.
Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.
If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.
Perhaps Boris is playing the "long game"?
Let Osborne become leader. Osborne proves to be even more toxic and useless than El Gord. Tories defeated heavily in 2020 with Osborne humiliated (hey a guy can dream) Boris comes in and saves the day.
Osborne nor Boris will even make it to the final two.
How lucky for Cameron that the main OUT figurehead is Boris who has clearly lost it.
Boris has lost it, but so has Cameron (see their relative poll ratings, both falling). I am utterly mystified by the "back of the queue" bollocks (and I don't believe for a minute Obama would have said this without Cameron urging it, or even writing it).
It's unnecessary. It's very risky. It looks terrible. REMAIN are very likely to win anyway. Why make yourself look like a snivelling treacherous c*nt, as Cameron has done? Bizarre.
"snivelling treacherous c*nt"
Can we use that as the standard description for Cameron from now on? Happy to credit it where necessary.
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
Plenty of time left for the narrative to change. The big cards have surely been played, and now it's for the long long grind to the end for Leave to chip away at.
The narrative has been set by remain very early in the campaign and I believe it has taken leave completely by surprise
Indeed, Remain had all the resources initially in their favour.
Boris would have had a better chance supporting Remain, backing Cameron 100% and then becoming Foreign Secretary. With Osborne fatally damaged, Boris could then have won by default - his "personality" overcoming any downside with the members who supported Brexit.
A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.
Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.
I'm struggling to see the Tories still being in with a chance though. Ed M clearly didn't inspire people to vote for him in droves nationally, but Khan seems to have the Corbynite crowd on site, without any first preference being syphoned off by Galloway, without putting off the rest of Labour voters who might otherwise stay at home as well, so will presumably maximise the Labour support, particularly since the Tories are internally divided at the moment, the LDs nowhere, and Zac being no Boris.
I'll happily admit I know little of London, but from the outside it's looking like Labour arrogance is well founded on this one.
I think I'm trying to be optimistic. There is value in a bet though. Mayoral and Assembly Member elections wildly different, mind.
There's a certain demographic of Guardian reading Corbyn supporters who are usually deeply suspicious of anything the US supports. I wonder how many left of centre voters also see the whole thing as an internal Tory party struggle and won't bother to turn out on the day.
The already soft Remain vote could be being made softer by the PMs use of American politicians to try and help his cause.
Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
Maybe we ought to be grateful that they care.
It really has been a 'nuclear' option by the US so you have to assume they really believe in the UK in the EU. Wonder how leave will accuse Cameron of writing Clinton's speech
Clinton hasn't said "get to the back of the queue, you smelly British twats" while standing at a lectern IN BRITAIN.
I can only conclude that he is passionately europhile, on a scale that makes Ken Clarke look like Nige Farage.
He just passionately detests the Eurosceptic wing of his own party and sees this as a one-off opportunity to bury them. Unfortunately he's only feeding the resentment.
I only hope the referendum result is so decisive that the losing side has to accept the result with good grace, whatever opinion they have of the way the campaign was fought.
He wouldn't be in power with the "eurosceptic wing" of his party given that he and his europhile opinions are in the minority within the party...
As for "accepting the defeat with grace".. Well, the British people's view will have to be respected but there will be plenty of people waiting to rip Cameron and Osborne to pieces in the coming months and years. Myself included.
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
Does Cameron get knifed in a VoC straight after the referendum?
Sorry to bang on about the London elections, but I was very grateful to Nick Palmer for giving his view on what is happening in the Labour party, stating that there is lots going on.
According to me red sources, apparently, Labour do have as many events as any London campaign but less activists are turning out. Also, they claim their vote is down, but I can't work out if that is versus the last Mayoral, 4 years ago or at the GE in 2015.
Clearly, if the latter, turnout will be about half, so of course their vote is down. If it is down versus 2012, then we Tories will be happy.
Re; Mayoralty, Labour have gone from quiet confidence to arrogance, Sadiq has won, absolute 100% certainty they say. So, they may be a smidgeon of value on the day if Zac drifts to a silly figure like 10 to 1. Zac still has a chance if Tories turn out and the quiet voters turn out too. Remember the GE. There's a chance.
For Assembly Member elections, we are in the dark. One senior Labour man told me that they might lose Brent & Harrow. F*ck me, if true, that is amazing. Therefore there might be a bet there, a fiver or so. Labour also claim they are struggling in Barnet & Camden and Ealing & Hillingdon. But they feel strong in North-east. The trouble with all this chat, is that the data is small in figures and lots of hearsay. On the other hand, the polls were great for Labour, but they didn't change their confidence/arrogance monitor. They (& Tories) are only reading their own data, the polls are too volatile.
Labour hold the seat of Westminster North - Karen Buck. Happily the council is controlled by the Tories. We have nice clean streets (well ish), and a low count of daft beards. Ms Buck is spectacularly ineffective in bringing socialism in her wake. No doubt she has some good stickers that she can deploy. She is a terrible MP.
Harrow should be safe Tory, but somehow it's not. There has been some awful local government there.
How lucky for Cameron that the main OUT figurehead is Boris who has clearly lost it.
Boris has lost it, but so has Cameron (see their relative poll ratings, both falling). I am utterly mystified by the "back of the queue" bollocks (and I don't believe for a minute Obama would have said this without Cameron urging it, or even writing it).
It's unnecessary. It's very risky. It looks terrible. REMAIN are very likely to win anyway. Why make yourself look like a snivelling treacherous c*nt, as Cameron has done? Bizarre.
"snivelling treacherous c*nt"
Can we use that as the standard description for Cameron from now on? Happy to credit it where necessary.
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
Despite being plainly a Europhile it is quite clear a large number of Eurosceptic Conservatives thought Cameron was "one of us".
Boris would have had a better chance supporting Remain, backing Cameron 100% and then becoming Foreign Secretary. With Osborne fatally damaged, Boris could then have won by default - his "personality" overcoming any downside with the members who supported Brexit.
A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.
Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.
It's hers to lose now.
Johnson's no more likely to become leader than Osborne. And he's got loser written all over his pasty face.
Cameron's salted the earth for any posho public schoolboy types with hopes of being in charge of the Tories, so whatever remains of the sub 100K member Conservative party will have to look elsewhere for a saviour. And they'll need to be capable of building bridges with big donors such as the MIC.
If REMAIN wins by margin Cameron will be totally ruthless with those who were on the other side. He's going to be hard to shift.
10 MPS. That's all it takes to block every single measure he wants to pursue in Parliament.
And he is earning the abiding hatred of many of the people - the activists on the ground - who the Tory party will rely upon to get re-elected.
He may not be able to be moved until he chooses to go but his legacy is toast. He will forever more be viewed in the same light as Heath. Burnt in effigy every November the 5th.
My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.
If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.
I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
As a party member of twenty years, I contacted quite a few fellow members in recent days, even the leavers aren't that het up. Gay marriage was more of an issue than this has been.
Some of them remember the 90s and don't want to make the same mistake of the 90s, this includes people that have never been that favourable to Cameron from the start.
Obviously I might be wrong, and you could be right, the local election results will be a good indicator.
I'm spending most of the next fortnight helping a Tory hold a council seat in West Yorkshire, I'll let you know what the other activists say.
Boris would have had a better chance supporting Remain, backing Cameron 100% and then becoming Foreign Secretary. With Osborne fatally damaged, Boris could then have won by default - his "personality" overcoming any downside with the members who supported Brexit.
A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.
Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.
It's hers to lose now.
Maybe Boris will come back into frame if/when all Cameron and Osborne's lies about how everything is gonna be amazing by shackling ourselves ever tighter to the EU comes back to bite them and the Tories?
Do you really trust losers like Juncker not to send the whole thing tits up in the years ahead? The euro is probably one more recession away from complete impolosion,etc...
Course we might finish up with a new Jerusalem through the EU but my guess is that a complete economic and political meltdown is more likely. If/when that happens maybe they'll send for Boris.
Comments
https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/723966508859269120
Besides, the best ones are unintentional.
https://twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/723966827085336576
Can someone remind what the punters thought of the likelihood of a Conservative Majority, prior to the results of the GE last year?
I do wonder if Cameron has made a major blunder here in getting Obama to speak out so bluntly - I think he views the left and centre-left as all sewn up for Remain and all that is needed is to persuade Tory voters to swing to Remain. But, as we are all know, there is a good chunk of the left that views anything backed by the US with suspicion. Add into that mix the view that TTIP is a plot to allow US private providers to take over the NHS and the left-wing vote for Remain may not look so certain.
No British politician advocates the way Americans should vote after all.
Assuming other US political candidates stay clear then good for them, and bad for those that seem unable to do so.
Or not
“Rather than scolding our closest allies for even considering exercising their rights as a sovereign nation, the President of the United States should look for ways to make Brexit, if it happens, an opportunity to enhance and strengthen the special relationship between our two countries.”
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/22/exclusive-sen-cruz-obama-brexit-comments-prez-make-opportunity-strengthen-special-relationship/
And that's without actually knowing what stance Trump is going to take now he's looking to switch to act "Presidential"
Wow, it's almost like they are both quoting the same US policy.
But that can't be, Dominic Raab assured us he knows better...
Obama said what his host (Cameron) asked him to say.
It doesn't add much to the arguments.
The US will do a deal if it's in their interests to do so. Which it will be. Speeches today notwithstanding.
As I said, the general consensus has been that the left-wing vote is in the bag for Remain - Obama may have upset that equation with what he said.
According to me red sources, apparently, Labour do have as many events as any London campaign but less activists are turning out. Also, they claim their vote is down, but I can't work out if that is versus the last Mayoral, 4 years ago or at the GE in 2015.
Clearly, if the latter, turnout will be about half, so of course their vote is down. If it is down versus 2012, then we Tories will be happy.
Re; Mayoralty, Labour have gone from quiet confidence to arrogance, Sadiq has won, absolute 100% certainty they say. So, they may be a smidgeon of value on the day if Zac drifts to a silly figure like 10 to 1. Zac still has a chance if Tories turn out and the quiet voters turn out too. Remember the GE. There's a chance.
For Assembly Member elections, we are in the dark. One senior Labour man told me that they might lose Brent & Harrow. F*ck me, if true, that is amazing. Therefore there might be a bet there, a fiver or so. Labour also claim they are struggling in Barnet & Camden and Ealing & Hillingdon. But they feel strong in North-east. The trouble with all this chat, is that the data is small in figures and lots of hearsay. On the other hand, the polls were great for Labour, but they didn't change their confidence/arrogance monitor. They (& Tories) are only reading their own data, the polls are too volatile.
Interesting...
I'm positioned against that nonsense anyway, but as I don't really believe GO will be next PM, and that I've no great wish to tie up funds waiting on Corbyn to self-identify with the tit-he-is I'm not piling in.
My money, as I think I've said before, is on Rees-Mogg! (Fun market in the odd fiver)
https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/723973515251212288
Which makes this response a) an answer to your query, b) an example of the phenomenon, and c) recursive to boot.
And now if you'll forgive me, I have to go do some work
I'm struggling to see the Tories still being in with a chance though. Ed M clearly didn't inspire people to vote for him in droves nationally, but Khan seems to have the Corbynite crowd on site, without any first preference being syphoned off by Galloway, without putting off the rest of Labour voters who might otherwise stay at home as well, so will presumably maximise the Labour support, particularly since the Tories are internally divided at the moment, the LDs nowhere, and Zac being no Boris.
I'll happily admit I know little of London, but from the outside it's looking like Labour arrogance is well founded on this one.
Someone needs to give the Leave campaign a massive kick in the arse. They need to stick to the Goves, Hannans, Hoeys and a couple of kippers, letting the Boris's and Nigels loose to shout their mouths off on the front pages really aren't helping the cause one little bit.
http://viz.co.uk/raffles-the-gentleman-thug/
My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
He's a fake, a liar, a fraud. a bully and a complete and utter waste of space!
Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.
Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.
If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.
US presidential hopeful weighs in on forthcoming vote as No 10 welcomes latest backing ahead of 23 June referendum
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/23/hillary-clinton-britain-should-stay-in-eu?CMP=twt_a-politics_b-gdnukpolitics
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/23/hillary-clinton-britain-should-stay-in-eu#comments
I thought Leave were claiming he had no influence whatsoever...
Exclusive @YouGov poll for @CapX: 59% of Americans say UK should "never" be at back of queue http://capx.co/59-of-americans-say-no-obama-britain-should-never-be-at-back-of-line/ …
I only hope the referendum result is so decisive that the losing side has to accept the result with good grace, whatever opinion they have of the way the campaign was fought.
Let Osborne become leader. Osborne proves to be even more toxic and useless than El Gord. Tories defeated heavily in 2020 with Osborne humiliated (hey a guy can dream) Boris comes in and saves the day.
Can we use that as the standard description for Cameron from now on? Happy to credit it where necessary.
Indeed, Remain had all the resources initially in their favour.
Lots to play for yet, though.
And Peter Bone.
What more could they possibly want?
A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.
Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.
It's hers to lose now.
The already soft Remain vote could be being made softer by the PMs use of American politicians to try and help his cause.
As for "accepting the defeat with grace".. Well, the British people's view will have to be respected but there will be plenty of people waiting to rip Cameron and Osborne to pieces in the coming months and years. Myself included.
NOT queueing would make you a traitor. Queueing like a true Brrit is the most patriotic of acts.
Harrow should be safe Tory, but somehow it's not. There has been some awful local government there.
http://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/
https://twitter.com/Trev_Forrester/status/723920875301527552
If it's anywhere up near 60% then it's a very bad defeat and makes Boris look bad in two ways:
1) being integral to a very unsuccessful campaign - not being able to make an impact
2) picking the wrong side in the first place - poor judgement
Which as an outsider is completely unfathomable.
Cameron's salted the earth for any posho public schoolboy types with hopes of being in charge of the Tories, so whatever remains of the sub 100K member Conservative party will have to look elsewhere for a saviour. And they'll need to be capable of building bridges with big donors such as the MIC.
And he is earning the abiding hatred of many of the people - the activists on the ground - who the Tory party will rely upon to get re-elected.
He may not be able to be moved until he chooses to go but his legacy is toast. He will forever more be viewed in the same light as Heath. Burnt in effigy every November the 5th.
Some of them remember the 90s and don't want to make the same mistake of the 90s, this includes people that have never been that favourable to Cameron from the start.
Obviously I might be wrong, and you could be right, the local election results will be a good indicator.
I'm spending most of the next fortnight helping a Tory hold a council seat in West Yorkshire, I'll let you know what the other activists say.
Do you really trust losers like Juncker not to send the whole thing tits up in the years ahead? The euro is probably one more recession away from complete impolosion,etc...
Course we might finish up with a new Jerusalem through the EU but my guess is that a complete economic and political meltdown is more likely. If/when that happens maybe they'll send for Boris.
Who knows...