Why not? Those who argue for change always do so in favour of an alternative which suits their party more. It's quite transparent and just demeans the person making the argument.
Why not? Those who argue for change always do so in favour of an alternative which suits their party more. It's quite transparent and just demeans the person making the argument.
...no? I'm a big PR supporter despite understanding it would be bad for Labour. It's clearly the right thing to do. I'm not tribal, though.
9 out of every 10 polls overestimated Labour against actual votes this parliament. As was mentioned. But we still had all this Labour's firewall and then E&W swing guff.
All those taxi jokes were correct about the LDs. Remarkable. I think I'm so stunned as I decided to vote for them today, knowing it would be toward a losing cause, but not this much of one.
I already knew I was a weird political wonk, but now being one of the minuscule people who actually liked the LD message of tempering the other two parties(if hardly endorsing all their other policies)? I'm clearly a freak.
Comments
GAIN Eastbourne.
Lewes next?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14000971
"What the FCUK is going on?"
Con +3.3
Lab -0.9
Majority back on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I thought the story of this election was that the Tories couldn't get anywhere near a majority and a good number of Lib Dems would manage to hold on?
well done Ed
The Thurso has lost Thurso.
Soooo loving tonight!
Labour sources say Ed Balls has lost.
She also said we would see a Conservative majority.
https://twitter.com/LibDemDeposits/status/596518336244088833
(I think the Garbage In, Garbage Out principle applies.)
It's the economy, stupid
I already knew I was a weird political wonk, but now being one of the minuscule people who actually liked the LD message of tempering the other two parties(if hardly endorsing all their other policies)? I'm clearly a freak.
Well done.