Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » David Herdson: The election remains far from a foregone con

SystemSystem Posts: 12,217
edited May 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » David Herdson: The election remains far from a foregone conclusion

Groupthink can be a most dangerous thing. To listen to many commentators, analysts and indeed many politicians, such is the consensus that you might believe that the election was all over and the result in; that result being Con and Lab roughly level, an SNP landslide in Scotland, the Lib Dems parliamentary party halved and UKIP and the Greens failing to register meaningfully.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    First, and I particularly enjoy the first scenario :)
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited May 2015
    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    They did have Tories on 37 in one poll, I think Labour were on 35 in the same poll.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,415
    I've travelled all the way up from Leeds !
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Pulpstar said:

    I've travelled all the way up from Leeds !

    To where?
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    Two Threads Ago:

    Croydon - Pelling. 6.5% Tory vote to squeeze for the blues. Safe as Battersea.

    The votes which Andrew Pelling got in 2010 should not be regarded as being votes which would otherwise be Conservative. Canvassing in 2010 showed that they would otherwise have been more-or-less evenly split between Conservativ & Labour.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,415
    RobD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    I've travelled all the way up from Leeds !

    To where?
    Will you let me finish ;)
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Pulpstar said:

    RobD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    I've travelled all the way up from Leeds !

    To where?
    Will you let me finish ;)
    "I've started, so I'll finish..."
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Not really, the way they now weight to something highly correlated with current VI, namely Jan/Feb VI, means that their normal MoE is less than the 3% or whatever you' might have expected from their sample size, and relatedly the probability of them randomly getter numbers more than 3% out is less than 5%.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Not really, the way they now weight to something highly correlated with current VI, namely Jan/Feb VI, means that their normal MoE is less than the 3% or whatever you' might have expected from their sample size, and relatedly the probability of them randomly getter numbers more than 3% out is less than 5%.
    It'd be interesting to see what the results were be if it were referenced to a different date, either before or after.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    RobD said:

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Not really, the way they now weight to something highly correlated with current VI, namely Jan/Feb VI, means that their normal MoE is less than the 3% or whatever you' might have expected from their sample size, and relatedly the probability of them randomly getter numbers more than 3% out is less than 5%.
    It'd be interesting to see what the results were be if it were referenced to a different date, either before or after.
    Probably not very different - the Jan/Feb results will in turn be sampled/weighted to be representative of the voting population, so the only thing this should affect is daily volatility.

    That said, there may be something systematically wrong with the whole approach - for example the mere fact of having been asked the same question in Jan/Feb may make people who said Lab more likely to say Lab again, or something like that.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Not really, the way they now weight to something highly correlated with current VI, namely Jan/Feb VI, means that their normal MoE is less than the 3% or whatever you' might have expected from their sample size, and relatedly the probability of them randomly getter numbers more than 3% out is less than 5%.
    So about one in twenty.

    We've had 28 YouGovs to date......
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    OT.. I was just looking on the BBC constituency poll website here: http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2015-31712045

    "Witney

    Poll suggests Con may hold this seat"

    Titter.....
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Not really, the way they now weight to something highly correlated with current VI, namely Jan/Feb VI, means that their normal MoE is less than the 3% or whatever you' might have expected from their sample size, and relatedly the probability of them randomly getter numbers more than 3% out is less than 5%.
    So about one in twenty.

    We've had 28 YouGovs to date......
    There'll also be a probability in the chance you don't have an outlier after 28 polls, which will probably not be zero (it'd be small though).
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    FPT
    HYUFD said:

    Sunil They elect the state legislatures who elect the upper house by PR, end of conversation, even India is not fully FPTP

    HYUFD All the state legislatures are elected via single-member FPTP - end of conversation!
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044

    FPT

    HYUFD said:

    Sunil They elect the state legislatures who elect the upper house by PR, end of conversation, even India is not fully FPTP

    HYUFD All the state legislatures are elected via single-member FPTP - end of conversation!
    Sunil, the real question is how is the Galactic Senate elected??
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    No. of opinion polls per month since August:
    https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594242341826928640/photo/1
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    edited May 2015

    No. of opinion polls per month since August:
    twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594242341826928640/photo/1

    Maybe online non-YouGov, online YouGov would be good categories to use.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    Labour % leads in monthly "super-ELBOWs" split into YouGov and non-YG:

    https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594269928120786944
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    And here's the split into Phone polls v. Online: https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594264607885254657
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    RobD said:

    FPT

    HYUFD said:

    Sunil They elect the state legislatures who elect the upper house by PR, end of conversation, even India is not fully FPTP

    HYUFD All the state legislatures are elected via single-member FPTP - end of conversation!
    Sunil, the real question is how is the Galactic Senate elected??
    Ahem - Imperial Senate ;)
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    RobD said:

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Not really, the way they now weight to something highly correlated with current VI, namely Jan/Feb VI, means that their normal MoE is less than the 3% or whatever you' might have expected from their sample size, and relatedly the probability of them randomly getter numbers more than 3% out is less than 5%.
    So about one in twenty.

    We've had 28 YouGovs to date......
    There'll also be a probability in the chance you don't have an outlier after 28 polls, which will probably not be zero (it'd be small though).
    Yes, but the 'coincidence' is stretching further and further - a bit like when OGH told me the SNP lead in the YouGov subsamples post SindyRef was meaningless......
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    ELBOW weekly Lab % leads - YG and non-YG updated for "week"-ending 1st May. NB. The last ELBOW of the campaign will cover polls 1st May to 6th May :)

    YG more favourable to Lab since "methodology change"?

    https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594281021631246336
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    For old time's sake, the traditional ELBOW updated for 1st May:
    https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594276237624942592

  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,149
    Ooops, 5 am - better get some sleep :lol:

    @RobD - weell, OK, I'll consider "online non-YG" data ;)
  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    It's fascinating stuff, and of course anything could happen, how the Lib Dems hold up wil be vital.

    There's been 209 polls this year, in my model only the Ashcroft in mid Jan with labour at 28% suggested a situation where Con+LD can muster a majority.

    I have the luxury of fundamentally not giving a jot who wins, my betfair positions are mostly green, overall profit looks safe. I don't have to live with the consequences of the results, If I can resist trading it's all just entertainment.
  • GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191
    Moving average chart of the 100 most recent YouGov polls. Click to enlarge...

    Simple, Free Image and File Hosting at MediaFire

    YouGov's methology changed at data point number 76 and took 5 days to fully impact upon the moving average.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Gadfly said:

    Moving average chart of the 100 most recent YouGov polls. Click to enlarge...

    Simple, Free Image and File Hosting at MediaFire

    YouGov's methology changed at data point number 76 and took 5 days to fully impact upon the moving average.

    So it looks like it may have taken a point or two off the Blues (or they could have fallen due to actual opinion changes). Wish they published both numbers so we could see the effect.
  • GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191
    This year's telephone polls vs YouGov polls. Click charts to enlarge...

    Simple, Free Image and File Hosting at MediaFire

    Simple, Free Image and File Hosting at MediaFire
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    What a great thread by Mr Herdson. Several variables mentioned without bias. Im really jittery about this election cos I'm worried both phone & online polls have big flaws. Somethings badly badly wrong with YG & thats not helping. Even if the 2 big guns finish neck & neck YG polls should NOT show so little variation. As say somethings badly badly wrong there.
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    Off topic thinking about the QT I'm not sure Camerons actual message was the dogs balls. He went really big on cuts ahead but thats not the greatest sales pitch. It seemed kinda harsh & uncaring. The nasty side of the tories I thought they'd buried? Don't know but Miliband was a bit more humane.

    Less confident after yesterdays polls that tories will win. Tonights pretty crucial. Royal baby to save the tories?!
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    edited May 2015

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Yes its a big big problem. There should be outliers with so many polls. Instead theres almost no variation - like 1 or 2% either side of the split. Its all wrong. They've got big problems & that makes me blimmin jittery about the other's.

    Im honestly wondering if were heading for a 1992 style polling disaster.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    And here's the split into Phone polls v. Online: https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594264607885254657

    IF the result is markedly different from the consensus - this chart could be very telling.....
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    ElectionForecast: coalition parties on 46% and 306 seats. With some PR electoral systems 46% can be enough to win a majority.
  • TabmanTabman Posts: 1,046
    RobD said:

    OT.. I was just looking on the BBC constituency poll website here: http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2015-31712045

    "Witney

    Poll suggests Con may hold this seat"

    Titter.....

    THREE Labour posters up in Witney this morning!
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,950
    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    If YouGov is right, we are ALL in the early stages of Labour.....
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693

    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    If YouGov is right, we are ALL in the early stages of Labour.....
    I suspect this joke is going to get endlessly recycled over the next 24 hours.

    You should claim copyright!
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    If YouGov is right, we are ALL in the early stages of Labour.....
    At least the pain of Labour is worthwhile for the Duchess...
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,950
    Pong said:

    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    If YouGov is right, we are ALL in the early stages of Labour.....
    I suspect this joke is going to get endlessly recycled over the next 24 hours.

    You should claim copyright!
    Thank you for the upgrade from "wry observation" to "joke"!
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,950
    edited May 2015
    On topic, whilst a complete buggers muddle is still the most likely outcome, it is still possible that we will be gathering here on Friday after the polls failed to spot a late-breaking surge to the Tories, with a wipe-out of Labour in Scotland, a Farage-free HoC, a very poor performance by Labour in Yorkshire, the Midlands and the south outside London, a minibus of LibDems with no Nick Clegg, with Cameron back in Downing Street and us all waiting for the resignation of Ed Miliband as party leader.....

    Which would have to rank as one of the most astonishing elections any of us have known.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    Expect the election to take the back burner for the next day or so...
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Penultimate ARSE with added APLOMB 2015 General Election & "JackW Dozen" Prediction Countdown :

    2 hours 2 minutes 2 seconds
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044
    JackW said:

    Penultimate ARSE with added APLOMB 2015 General Election & "JackW Dozen" Prediction Countdown :

    2 hours 2 minutes 2 seconds

    Saw this today, and thought of you:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Jacobite_Party

    :D
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,950
    RobD said:

    Expect the election to take the back burner for the next day or so...

    Did the clocks stop when Princess Anne was born? Or Harry? How can people get so worked up about the spare to the heir?

    No doubt it will happen, but as a monarchist-because-it-annoys-the-republican-Left, I just don't get it......
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,044

    RobD said:

    Expect the election to take the back burner for the next day or so...

    Did the clocks stop when Princess Anne was born? Or Harry? How can people get so worked up about the spare to the heir?

    No doubt it will happen, but as a monarchist-because-it-annoys-the-republican-Left, I just don't get it......
    Because the press love it
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,706
    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    Well the parties might as well forget any last minute 'gamechanging' TV stuff they had planned this weekend.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Morning all – and thanks once again Mr Herdson, for your thoughts.

    As we settle down to enjoy the Bank Holiday weekend, may I extend my good wishes to the Duke & Duchess of Cambridge on the imminent birth of their second child - and thank them both for a timely distraction from daily politics. :lol:
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited May 2015
    It'll knock the politics off the front pages on the last sunday before the election - I expect any major scoops/announcements/narrative changes etc will be delayed. Labour will be glad the, err, labour is safely out of the way before thursday - and they'll hope this will move things on from the implications of their Scotastrophe

    I just really hope, in this febrile atmosphere, that all sides can keep from trying to use the birth to score political points. It's inevitable that someone, somewhere is going to say something stupid/insensitive - when it happens, can we please just ignore them, whatever the colour of their rosette?

    Anyway,

    Good luck to William & Kate. And welcome to the world, Prince Nigel!
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    Pong said:

    It'll knock the politics off the front pages on the last sunday before the election -

    Only if she gives birth by 10pm. Thats likely but not a given.
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Expect the election to take the back burner for the next day or so...

    Did the clocks stop when Princess Anne was born? Or Harry? How can people get so worked up about the spare to the heir?

    No doubt it will happen, but as a monarchist-because-it-annoys-the-republican-Left, I just don't get it......
    Because the press love it
    So do the people.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976

    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Expect the election to take the back burner for the next day or so...

    Did the clocks stop when Princess Anne was born? Or Harry? How can people get so worked up about the spare to the heir?

    No doubt it will happen, but as a monarchist-because-it-annoys-the-republican-Left, I just don't get it......
    Because the press love it
    So do the people.
    Hmm - and some more than others...!

    http://media.themalaysianinsider.com/assets/uploads/articles/britain_royal_baby_watchers_london_afp_300415.jpg
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    edited May 2015
    So whats effect of the royal baby likely to be? Good points by Pong about not using him or her for party political ends so heres some lowdown.

    Mondays papers & maybe tomorrows if Kates birthed by 10pm, as probable, will be awash with baby headers and pictures. But remember its a bank holiday weekend anyway so politically the timings perfect. Sunday / Monday paper sales may be up with souvenir editions.

    Tuesday will be half and half I think. Half pics and half politics. Wednesday will be right back to politics.

    So news wise I don't think it'll matter much as its bank holiday weekend. People aren't thinking politics over a bank holiday.

    Feel good? Dunno. Maybe. Assuming alls fine that should help tories. Good wishes to the lovely couple anyhows. Cute.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711
    Great article, David. I'm on the SNP in Glasgow NE.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    On topic, whilst a complete buggers muddle is still the most likely outcome, it is still possible that we will be gathering here on Friday after the polls failed to spot a late-breaking surge to the Tories, with a wipe-out of Labour in Scotland, a Farage-free HoC, a very poor performance by Labour in Yorkshire, the Midlands and the south outside London, a minibus of LibDems with no Nick Clegg, with Cameron back in Downing Street and us all waiting for the resignation of Ed Miliband as party leader.....

    Which would have to rank as one of the most astonishing elections any of us have known.

    Who would be astonished? Shadsy offers 11/2 against a Conservatve overall majority, so roughly a 15 per cent chance of it happening. That corresponds to mildly surprising, not astonishing. There does not even have to be a late surge for the Conservatives, just a well-targeted one.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Will the nation follow suit and shortly enter into a lengthy period of Labour .... ??

    Find out at 9:00am as the birth of a new ARSE reveals all .... :smile:

  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766

    On topic, whilst a complete buggers muddle is still the most likely outcome, it is still possible that we will be gathering here on Friday after the polls failed to spot a late-breaking surge to the Tories, with a wipe-out of Labour in Scotland, a Farage-free HoC, a very poor performance by Labour in Yorkshire, the Midlands and the south outside London, a minibus of LibDems with no Nick Clegg, with Cameron back in Downing Street and us all waiting for the resignation of Ed Miliband as party leader.....

    Which would have to rank as one of the most astonishing elections any of us have known.

    Who would be astonished? Shadsy offers 11/2 against a Conservatve overall majority, so roughly a 15 per cent chance of it happening. That corresponds to mildly surprising, not astonishing. There does not even have to be a late surge for the Conservatives, just a well-targeted one.
    Spot on. Its only those certain polling is right who would be astonished & even then ignoring the occasional 5% or even 6% tory lead. If these latter are right then the odds of a majority are close to evens.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    And here's the split into Phone polls v. Online: https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594264607885254657

    That's illuminating.

    The phones picking up a sharp swingback, the internet saying small swingback.

    When it comes down to demographics and randomisation, it's easy to hypothesise why.
  • PurseybearPurseybear Posts: 766
    JackW said:

    Will the nation follow suit and shortly enter into a lengthy period of Labour .... ??

    Nah. We'll be delivered of that.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Pong said:

    It'll knock the politics off the front pages on the last sunday before the election - I expect any major scoops/announcements/narrative changes etc will be delayed. Labour will be glad the, err, labour is safely out of the way before thursday - and they'll hope this will move things on from the implications of their Scotastrophe

    I just really hope, in this febrile atmosphere, that all sides can keep from trying to use the birth to score political points. It's inevitable that someone, somewhere is going to say something stupid/insensitive - when it happens, can we please just ignore them, whatever the colour of their rosette?

    Anyway,

    Good luck to William & Kate. And welcome to the world, Prince Nigel!

    I think royalty do not vote, but prince Nigel may cause a kipper surge in 20 years time:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/32264700
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    JackW said:

    Will the nation follow suit and shortly enter into a lengthy period of Labour .... ??

    Nah. We'll be delivered of that.
    There may be sleepless nights and wailing ahead...
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711

    And here's the split into Phone polls v. Online: https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594264607885254657

    Great work Sunil. It looks like the Tories are banking on the phone polls being right.

    I just don't know who's right. My instinct is the Tories are 2% ahead, which isn't enough of course.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711

    JackW said:

    Will the nation follow suit and shortly enter into a lengthy period of Labour .... ??

    Nah. We'll be delivered of that.
    There may be sleepless nights and wailing ahead...
    But while there's music and moonlight and love and romance.
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    A good laugh to start the day.

    Back in the Eighties, Jackie magazine famously published strips of melodramatic teenage romances.

    As the election campaign rolls interminably on, we've decide to create our own photo casebook featuring that ever-flirting pair Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon.

    The teenage Nicola is sweet on the nerdy youngster, but can she seduce him with her charm and wiles when he's only got eyes for her friend Clegg?

    Read on...

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3064879/Ed-Nicola-Jackie-Magazine-special-Scots-lass-loved-independence-met-class-nerd-anorak-Ed-fall-wee-mouse-liker-her.html
  • TabmanTabman Posts: 1,046

    On topic, whilst a complete buggers muddle is still the most likely outcome, it is still possible that we will be gathering here on Friday after the polls failed to spot a late-breaking surge to the Tories, with a wipe-out of Labour in Scotland, a Farage-free HoC, a very poor performance by Labour in Yorkshire, the Midlands and the south outside London, a minibus of LibDems with no Nick Clegg, with Cameron back in Downing Street and us all waiting for the resignation of Ed Miliband as party leader.....

    Which would have to rank as one of the most astonishing elections any of us have known.

    Given there is no option on the ballot paper to vote for Coalition 2.0 I think it's more likely than many suspect; a Tory majority untempered by the Lib Dems being safer than McMiliband even if not the first choice.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Great article, David. I'm on the SNP in Glasgow NE.

    So am I. The SNP seem to have strengthened further on the west coast of Scotland since that was polled and I now would not be particularly surprised if that bet came home. We are in the Scotterdämmerung.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Chan e of seeing no outliers can be calculated as 0.95 to the power of N where N is the number of days. Over a 20 day run there is a better than 1 in 3 Chance of seeing no outliers. Over 30 days it is still 1 in 5 of seeing no outliers.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,706
    Do we know whether phone polls use mobiles? If they don't they clearly aren't sampling the full population.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    antifrank said:

    Great article, David. I'm on the SNP in Glasgow NE.

    So am I. The SNP seem to have strengthened further on the west coast of Scotland since that was polled and I now would not be particularly surprised if that bet came home. We are in the Scotterdämmerung.
    I took 5/1 on them there as a trading bet as I thought betting market hadn't caught up with polls. Now, amazingly, I am letting it ride as the polls have overtaken my perception
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711
    Jonathan said:

    Do we know whether phone polls use mobiles? If they don't they clearly aren't sampling the full population.

    Yes.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,672
    The most astonishing result would be a Labour majority. The second most astonishing a Labour plurality. The most likely result is a comfortable Tory plurality. A Tory majority would be mildly surprising. In short, the campaign has changed very little.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711
    antifrank said:

    Great article, David. I'm on the SNP in Glasgow NE.

    So am I. The SNP seem to have strengthened further on the west coast of Scotland since that was polled and I now would not be particularly surprised if that bet came home. We are in the Scotterdämmerung.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4n--IXg6HY
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,711

    The most astonishing result would be a Labour majority. The second most astonishing a Labour plurality. The most likely result is a comfortable Tory plurality. A Tory majority would be mildly surprising. In short, the campaign has changed very little.

    100/1 available on Betfair for a Labour majority.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited May 2015
    antifrank said:

    Great article, David. I'm on the SNP in Glasgow NE.

    So am I. The SNP seem to have strengthened further on the west coast of Scotland since that was polled and I now would not be particularly surprised if that bet came home. We are in the Scotterdämmerung.
    Scotterdammerung! Great neologism!
    Financier said:

    A good laugh to start the day.

    Back in the Eighties, Jackie magazine famously published strips of melodramatic teenage romances.

    As the election campaign rolls interminably on, we've decide to create our own photo casebook featuring that ever-flirting pair Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon.

    The teenage Nicola is sweet on the nerdy youngster, but can she seduce him with her charm and wiles when he's only got eyes for her friend Clegg?

    Read on...

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3064879/Ed-Nicola-Jackie-Magazine-special-Scots-lass-loved-independence-met-class-nerd-anorak-Ed-fall-wee-mouse-liker-her.html

    Classic! Though more than a little wierd. I like the bit where jilted Nicola breaks into "Eds humble North London Mansion" and is shocked by his two kitchens.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    I only mentioned this last night as a "black signet" event ( even if known about and the signets are actually white at birth I believe.)

    This could play well for Milliband as some of the electorate will think " going into Labour" is Kate's endorsement of the red team as such they will vote same way.
    ;-)

    Or is Cameron just a lucky general again.... .?
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    JackW said:

    Will the nation follow suit and shortly enter into a lengthy period of Labour .... ??

    Nah. We'll be delivered of that.

    If Labour finishes well then the only contractions will be in the economy
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,706
    edited May 2015

    The most astonishing result would be a Labour majority. The second most astonishing a Labour plurality. The most likely result is a comfortable Tory plurality. A Tory majority would be mildly surprising. In short, the campaign has changed very little.

    A Tory majority would be unexpected.

    If the polls tell us anything it's that Labour are up and the Tories are down wrt to 2010.

    In 2010, with 37% and an 8 pt lead the Tories didn't win a majority.
    In 1992, they barely scraped a majority with 42% of the vote.

  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Sunil's phone v online graph is great. Two minor points in favour of the phone pollsters:

    (a) they have shown what was generally expected a priori and a continuation of the trend. Bayesian logic is therefore a point in their favour
    (b) Populus tweaked their internet methodology the other day - this might just be herding but it's interesting that it's come from the internet side
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,808
    Pong said:

    It'll knock the politics off the front pages on the last sunday before the election - I expect any major scoops/announcements/narrative changes etc will be delayed. Labour will be glad the, err, labour is safely out of the way before thursday - and they'll hope this will move things on from the implications of their Scotastrophe

    I just really hope, in this febrile atmosphere, that all sides can keep from trying to use the birth to score political points. It's inevitable that someone, somewhere is going to say something stupid/insensitive - when it happens, can we please just ignore them, whatever the colour of their rosette?

    Anyway,

    Good luck to William & Kate. And welcome to the world, Prince Nigel!

    If only!
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,834
    antifrank said:

    Great article, David. I'm on the SNP in Glasgow NE.

    So am I. The SNP seem to have strengthened further on the west coast of Scotland since that was polled and I now would not be particularly surprised if that bet came home. We are in the Scotterdämmerung.
    Scotterdämmerung: that is brilliant! I've just googled it and it's returned three hits. You really ought to get your credit in before someone in the national media nicks it.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,672

    The most astonishing result would be a Labour majority. The second most astonishing a Labour plurality. The most likely result is a comfortable Tory plurality. A Tory majority would be mildly surprising. In short, the campaign has changed very little.

    100/1 available on Betfair for a Labour majority.

    Taking out a few notes and using them to light a fire would be a better use of money than placing a bet on a Labour majority!

    My final forecast range:
    Tories - 285-305
    Labour - 245-265
    LibDems - 20-30
    SNP - 55-59



  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    @Purseybear

    YouGov's incredibly stable outcome is actually what we should expect if opinion hasn't changed. Statistical MOE on opinion polls isn't actually 3% (because of weighting) and they are now weighting to prior opinion rather than just demography which will increase stability still further [by design]. Look up edmundintokyo's posts yesterday for more on this.

    The issue is whether the internet panels are full of more politically aware people who are more likely than average to be committed. But they tracked the Labour slump just fine until January. If the phone pollsters prove correct I think we will have to consider the infiltration & manipulation hypothesis.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    On Scotterdammerung:

    There will be a lot of unemployed SLAB MPs shortly. No doubt many are fairly useless lobby fodder, but there must be a fair number who are reasonably talented and not wanting to give up politics.

    Surely the obvious outlet is to become MSP's next year?

    This would have two effects: some degree of opposition to SNP hegemony; and secondly to make Scottish politics even more inward looking.

    Interesting times!
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Another +1 for Scotterdämmerung :)
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,516
    edited May 2015
    So three days of Royal baby stories ahead, spinners planning their last push messages will be pushed off the air waves.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032

    And here's the split into Phone polls v. Online: https://twitter.com/Sunil_P2/status/594264607885254657


    I do think/hope that this chart could prove to be one of the most significant of the election and well done to Sunil for collating it. It shows a consistent and increasing swing to the Tories in the phone polls indicative of a lead by polling day of maybe 4%. This is being masked by Yougov in particular which is showing a swing back to Labour and dragging the average back to flat.

    I don't think anyone can be completely confident about who is right and who is wrong in this polling but one delivers one of David's surprises and one delivers another. In court cases that are not clear cut one of the tests is which side would you rather be on? I think in this case I would rather be on the side of the phones.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,834
    edited May 2015
    Alistair said:

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Chan e of seeing no outliers can be calculated as 0.95 to the power of N where N is the number of days. Over a 20 day run there is a better than 1 in 3 Chance of seeing no outliers. Over 30 days it is still 1 in 5 of seeing no outliers.
    But an outlier is one beyond the MoE, which is usually quoted as 3%. Even if methodology has reduced that number a bit, we're barely seeing any variation more than one point either side of the mode. Indeed, since Easter, there's only been one YouGov poll to put the Tories outside 34±1, none to have put Labour outside 35±1, none to have put the Lib Dems outside 8±1, none to have put UKIP outside 13±1 and none to have put the Greens outside 5±1.

    That is more than consistent.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    SPIN - Con +25
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,834
    Moses_ said:

    TGOHF said:

    @SkyNewsBreak: The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital and is in the early stages of labour #RoyalBaby

    I only mentioned this last night as a "black signet" event ( even if known about and the signets are actually white at birth I believe.)

    ...
    I believe they're usually gold.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Good morning, everyone.

    Still undecided about how I'll follow things, and for how long. The agony of choice!

    If Witcher 3 came out earlier, I'd just play that for ages and occasionally flick back onto the TV in between playing cards and severing heads.

    Mr. Herdson's quite right. This election's as hard to call as the start of the 2012 F1 season (when the first seven races had seven different winners).
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited May 2015

    Another +1 for Scotterdämmerung :)

    I don't get it.

    "dämmerung" is twilight, right?

    so, Scottish twilight. In German. Presumably there's more to it that that, or some cultural/political/historical reference I'm not getting?
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039

    Alistair said:

    Excellent article Mr Herdson.

    The thing that strikes me as odd about Yougov is the consistency of their polls - surely they should have thrown up one outlier by now?

    Chan e of seeing no outliers can be calculated as 0.95 to the power of N where N is the number of days. Over a 20 day run there is a better than 1 in 3 Chance of seeing no outliers. Over 30 days it is still 1 in 5 of seeing no outliers.
    But an outlier is one beyond the MoE, which is usually quoted as 3%. Even if methodology has reduced that number a bit, we're barely seeing any variation more than one point either side of the mode. Indeed, since Easter, there's only been one poll to put the Tories outside 34±1, none to have put Labour outside 35±1, none to have put the Lib Dems outside 8±1, none to have put UKIP outside 13±1 and none to have put the Greens outside 5±1.

    That is more than consistent.
    Once you start weighting to known (not recalled) prior opinions as well as demographics I think the statistical MoE might actually be more like 1-1.5%.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,505

    On Scotterdammerung:

    There will be a lot of unemployed SLAB MPs shortly. No doubt many are fairly useless lobby fodder, but there must be a fair number who are reasonably talented and not wanting to give up politics.

    Surely the obvious outlet is to become MSP's next year?

    This would have two effects: some degree of opposition to SNP hegemony; and secondly to make Scottish politics even more inward looking.

    Interesting times!

    However , Lamont closed the lists last year and said that sitting MSP's could not be ousted for carpet baggers , she knew what was coming.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,672
    Jonathan said:

    The most astonishing result would be a Labour majority. The second most astonishing a Labour plurality. The most likely result is a comfortable Tory plurality. A Tory majority would be mildly surprising. In short, the campaign has changed very little.

    A Tory majority would be unexpected.

    If the polls tell us anything it's that Labour are up and the Tories are down wrt to 2010.

    In 2010, with 37% and an 8 pt lead the Tories didn't win a majority.
    In 1992, they barely scraped a majority with 42% of the vote.

    I think Labour's vote % will go up and the Tories will get more or less what they got in 2010. But Labour needs around 38-40 gains in E&W just to stand still. That is a very tough ask, as a lot of Red LDs will "come home" in existing Labour seats. I also fancy we'll see a fair bit of Tory tactical voting for incumbent LD MPs where they are up against a Labour challenger. I expect Labour will win fewer than 10 seats against the LDs. I doubt UKIP will take any Labour seats, but it would not surprise me if they did.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,032

    On Scotterdammerung:

    There will be a lot of unemployed SLAB MPs shortly. No doubt many are fairly useless lobby fodder, but there must be a fair number who are reasonably talented and not wanting to give up politics.

    Surely the obvious outlet is to become MSP's next year?

    This would have two effects: some degree of opposition to SNP hegemony; and secondly to make Scottish politics even more inward looking.

    Interesting times!

    The quality of SLAB MPs and the sort of institutional arrogance that allowed such placemen to become candidates is not the least of the problems they are facing at this election. SLAB have tested the donkey with the rosette theory to destruction. Very few would add much to the generally embarrassing level of debate in the Scottish Parliament.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Ok it's official sky's Kay "it's a babeeee" Burley on scene at the hospital now reporting so the Royal Sprog can be officially dropped.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Pong said:

    Another +1 for Scotterdämmerung :)

    I don't get it.

    "dämmerung" is twilight, right?

    so, Scottish twilight. In German. Presumably there's more to it that that, or some cultural/political/historical reference I'm not getting?
    It's the last of the Ring Cycle operas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Götterdämmerung

    Interminable etc. etc. ;)
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,964
    Mr. Pong, Gotterdammerung[sp], I think is Wagner reference.
  • TabmanTabman Posts: 1,046
    Pong said:

    Another +1 for Scotterdämmerung :)

    I don't get it.

    "dämmerung" is twilight, right?

    so, Scottish twilight. In German. Presumably there's more to it that that, or some cultural/political/historical reference I'm not getting?
    It's a pun on Gotterdammerung or twilight of the gods, from the Wagner Ring Cycle. As Hitler's (no Godwin!) favourite composer it also got used as shorthand for the collapse of the Third Reich
This discussion has been closed.