The UKIP vote in Scotland was remarkably even throughout the country, at about 10%. They did best in Dumfries & Galloway (13.4%) and worst in the capital Edinburgh (7.7%).
Other notable Scottish results:
- Not a single Scottish council area, out of 32, awarded any one party anything even close to a majority. The days when the SLab vote used to be weighed throughout west central Scotland are long over. The strongest single result was the SNP in Dundee (40.2%).
- SCON won in East Renfrewshire - Jim Murphy's seat
- the SLDs got just 14.2% in East Dunbartonshire - Jo Swinson's seat
- the SNP won Falkirk, the vacant IND seat
- SLAB just pipped the SNP in Edinburgh, by 0.1 points
City results:
Aberdeen City: SNP 15,412 (29.5%) Lab 12,420 (23.8%) Con 9824 (18.8%) UKIP 5025 (9.6%) LD 4605 (8.8%) Green 3723 (7.1%)
Dundee: SNP 13,573 (40.2%), Lab 9050 (26.8%) Con 4010 (11.9%) UKIP 2965 (8.8%) Green 2193 (6.5%) LD 1248 (3.7%)
Edinburgh: Lab 32,758 (23.1%) SNP 32,721 (23%) Con 27,554 (19.4%) Green 22,836 (16.1%) LD 12,575 (8.9%) UKIP 10,992 (7.7%)
Glasgow: Lab 45,676 (35.2%) SNP 37,820 (29.1%) Green 15,359 (11.8%) UKIP 12,638 (9.7%) Con 10,985 (8.5%) LD 6830 (3%)
Strangely if last nights results were repeated in a GE www.electoralcalculus.co.uk predicts labour making 46 gains and being almost the same size as a Con \ UKIP block, with a rump LD and various nationalists deciding who governs. You'd imagine they'd go with Labour, in that circumstance
The worst result for his party and the country was Nick Clegg getting fecked by the Tories and not asking if they were wearing a condom while they were shafting him.
Strangely if last nights results were repeated in a GE www.electoralcalculus.co.uk predicts labour making 46 gains and being almost the same size as a Con \ UKIP block, with a rump LD and various nationalists deciding who governs. You'd imagine they'd go with Labour, in that circumstance
YouGov seem by some distance to have had the best performance by a pollster in judging these elections, getting both the right order and reasonably close approximations of the shares of the top three.
YouGov seem by some distance to have had the best performance by a pollster in judging these elections, getting both the right order and reasonably close approximations of the shares of the top three.
Glass half full types for each party will see consolations, and glass half-empty types for each party will see disappointments. The great unanswered question: what would UKIP's share have been without the intense focus on it in the last week or so?
"He has done what those who elected him wanted him to do, rejecting the effort to appeal beyond the core vote at all costs in the Tony Blair manner to reiterate more traditional Labour and social democratic values."
"Whether the vagaries of a four-party battle on unreformed boundaries will allow Labour to win a Commons majority with a core vote strategy is one of the unknowns of the next 12 months. Whether winning with a percentage share in the low 30s would be sustainable in office is questionable. Like it or not, though, this has been Mr Miliband's strategy. It is a bit rich of his party to panic about it, when Mr Miliband is doing what he promised all along."
Incidentally, the BBC report Jobbik came second in Hungary, which is true. However, their vote share of 18% is down on the general election and they came second largely because the centre left coalition at the general election broke into its constituent parts for this one.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
Yes, AIFE cost UKIP 2 seats by my count. Nattrass played the spoiler and in this he was successful.
If AIFE was the spoiler in England, UKIP themselves were the spoiler in Scotland. Without the strong UKIP performance the Scottish Conservatives would almost certainly have had their best result in 30 years.
So we're moving into 4 party politics and FPTP - that'll cause some fun!
I wonder if we will see more tactical voting. I could see Tories who had all but given up in the North voting tactically (for UKIP) on a 'keep the weirdo out' ticket.
Good result for UKIP, horrendous for the Lib Dems. For a governing party four years in I guess the Tories will be reasonably happy with their result, and Labour, opposition one year out from the GE, have pause for thought.
UKIP MEP in "social democratic Scotland" was certainly not in the YESNP's script....
Looking through the EU wide results, I was quite shocked at how distored these euro elections are. Thay make UK consituencies seem even.
Malta, pop 418,000 = 6 seats Luxembourg pop 531,000 = 6 seats Cyprus (southern) pop 839,000 = 6 seats Estonia population 1.339 million = 6 seats Latvia population 2.025 = 8 seats Slovenia 2.058 million = 8 seats Lithuania population 3 million = 11 seats R of Ireland pop 4.6 million = 11 seats (nb compare with NI 1.8m pop = 3 seats) Finland Population 5.4 million =13 seats Slovakia population 5.4 million = 13 seats Denmark Population 5.6 million = 13 seats Sweden 9.6 million = 20 seats Hungary 10 million =21 seats Czech Republic 10.5 million = 21 seats
Combined population of this lot = 61.3 million, seats = 163
UK Population =63 million, seats = 74
So a lower population has more than twice the seats as the UK with Malta which has only 418,000 population having 6 seats with 70,000 population per seat (about the size of a small westminster consituency against UK with 851,000 population per seat, over ten times the size.
This is rotten to the core and also means that federalist countries like Luxembourg are disproportionately represented.
Looking through the EU wide results, I was quite shocked at how distored these euro elections are. Thay make UK consituencies seem even.
Malta, pop 418,000 = 6 seats Luxembourg pop 531,000 = 6 seats Cyprus (southern) pop 839,000 = 6 seats Estonia population 1.339 million = 6 seats Latvia population 2.025 = 8 seats Slovenia 2.058 million = 8 seats Lithuania population 3 million = 11 seats R of Ireland pop 4.6 million = 11 seats (nb compare with NI 1.8m , pop = 3 seats) Finland Population 5.4 million =13 seats Slovakia population 5.4 million = 13 seats Denmark Population 5.6 million = 13 seats Sweden 9.6 million = 20 seats Hungary 10 million =21 seats Czech Republic 10.5 million = 21 seats
Combined population of this lot = 61.3 million, seats = 163
UK Population =63 million, seats = 74
So a lower population has more than twice the seats as the UK with Malta which has only 418,000 population having 6 seats with 70,000 population per seat (about the size of a small westminster consituency against UK with 851,000 population per seat, over ten times the size.
This is rotten to the core and also means that federalist countries like Luxembourg are disproportionately represented.
You could add Scotland pop 5.3 million = 6 seats, ie the same as Malta, and barely more than half what the Irish get with a smaller population.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
I expect the walls of the sandcastle will simply be built higher.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
That's a good result for UKIP, not an earth shattering one. Given the polls they must have been secretly hoping for 30% plus. The Tories have done pretty well. Labour less well but just about OK. The LibDems - I'm struggling to see Anti-Frank's half full glass.
There's nothing in these results to suggest anything other than a Hung Parliament next year. MP numbers will depend on how the UKIP vote redistributes, whether Greens stick or twist and what Thursday's non-voters do. Labour may well get a slightly disproportionate boost from the latter two.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
Who knows but anticipating difficulty shouldn't negate the attempt.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
They have a lot to answer for.
The amusing feature of the LD's backing the babyeaters meme is the naive belief that Labour can somehow reverse the 'cuts' via the fruit from the magic money tree - clearly jo public is unconvinced. One feature of note - Tories outperfoming the opinion polls again - shy Tory syndrome?
Finally Scotland begins to loook a little better fron the Tory perspective - little sign also of a pro-independence surge.
Stripping out some of the worst aspects of the Lansley health bill for one.
But a lot of the moderating behind the scenes, in cabinet. Have no doubt that we would have had a much harder line government under a Conservative majority government.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
The great thing about the word "reform" is that it means something different to everybody. I'm still not sure what Cameron actually wants, but I'm pretty sure he's not demanding more protectionism and less globalization.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
Why would anyone backing independence have voted Labour in Scotland last Thursday though?
For the first time in modern history neither labour or tories won an election and this is Just good?
Mind you the telegraph blogger who is claiming that the "Tory Machine Walked Away a Good Result" has to take the biscuit. The first time EVER the tories did not get first or second and it is a good result. Hate to think what a mediocre one would be.
As Nick Robinson suddenly stopped mid conversation and pointed out when the panel were earnestly discussing how many seats UKIP would get at this election, such a conservation would have been incredible only a few weeks ago.
PS - apologies for accidently clicking off topic, pressed wrong button.
Although my ARSE did not cover the Euro Elections the JackW prediction of :
Ukip 27% .. Lab 24% .. Con 22% .. Green 8% .. LibDem 8%
wasn't too shabby.
I'm hoping to put all the local/Euro numbers into ARSE by Wednesday to issue the latest ARSE 2015 GE prediction by Thursday. I also hope to name all the "JackW Dozen" - 13 constituencies that will determine the shape of the GE - by a week tomorrow.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
...not to mention get past their terminally narked-off electorates. Certainly not "less banking regulation" or "less worker protection" or "special deals for Britain with nothing in return for us"...
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
The great thing about the word "reform" is that it means something different to everybody. I'm still not sure what Cameron actually wants, but I'm pretty sure he's not demanding more protectionism and less globalization.
Oh of course but there has to be an opportunity to utilise the increased hostility to advantage the negotiations. I don't necessarily think it increases chances of successful negotiations but it may and it may be a means of widening the front on which renegotiation is attempted.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
Why would anyone backing independence have voted Labour in Scotland last Thursday though?
For the first time in modern history neither labour or tories won an election and this is Just good?
Mind you the telegraph blogger who is claiming that the "Tory Machine Walked Away a Good Result" has to take the biscuit. The first time EVER the tories did not get first or second and it is a good result. Hate to think what a mediocre one would be.
As Nick Robinson suddenly stopped mid conversation and pointed out when the panel were earnestly discussing how many seats UKIP would get at this election, such a conservation would have been incredible only a few weeks ago.
PS - apologies for accidently clicking off topic, pressed wrong button.
It's a good result, no doubt. And certainly an historic one. But 27.5% of a 36% turnout election in which the result makes no practical difference to any voters' lives is not a political earthquake. This is UKIP's summit and it's not as high as a few of us had expected.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
Those mysterious reforms that we're not allowed to be told about but that the cheerleaders guarantee will happen.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
Who knows but anticipating difficulty shouldn't negate the attempt.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
They have a lot to answer for.
Now we’ve got that sorted what long-term policies has Labour got? Freezing energy prices (bit Freudian, that) and rents doesn’t come to grips with the long term problems.
Stripping out some of the worst aspects of the Lansley health bill for one.
But a lot of the moderating behind the scenes, in cabinet. Have no doubt that we would have had a much harder line government under a Conservative majority government.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Old King Cole [7.54am] I asked local Lib Dem what difference they'd made and he told me it was all about taxation. Don't believe what you read in the Grauniad!
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
They have a lot to answer for.
Now we’ve got that sorted what long-term policies has Labour got? Freezing energy prices (bit Freudian, that) and rents doesn’t come to grips with the long term problems.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
The great thing about the word "reform" is that it means something different to everybody. I'm still not sure what Cameron actually wants, but I'm pretty sure he's not demanding more protectionism and less globalization.
Oh of course but there has to be an opportunity to utilise the increased hostility to advantage the negotiations. I don't necessarily think it increases chances of successful negotiations but it may and it may be a means of widening the front on which renegotiation is attempted.
Maybe if you give us some examples of the kind of things you think Cameron wants, the centrist majority won't automatically spike and Syriza and the Front National will be helpful with that'll make it clearer.
A fascinating night of entertainment spoiled only by the yellow pox retaining 1 MEP. 4 party politics is well and truly here, ditch your models that exclude UKIP (and opinion polls that don't prompt for them), ditch your comparisons to elections without a big UKIP block, welcome to madness.
Under FPTP with what we saw last night its almost a lottery. Its going to reinforce the reality of this electoral system that national percentage shares and proportion of seats really have no meaning. Funnily enough Farage understands this better than anyone, and I think we're going to see them win more than the zero seats so many of you confidently state they will win based on 3 party thinking and national swings.
According to Wiki turnout in 2009 was 34.7% and turnout this time according to the BBC is 34.19%. I think I might have won my bet with Nick after all which is a bit unexpected to be honest.
Some of the factors on which I based my assessment have certainly been proven to be correct. The Labour vote where there were no other elections has not bothered. UKIP has not caused a surge in the NOTA who sat on their arses as usual. The LIb Dems face an extinction event and the tories turned out with heavy hearts on the back of quite a good internet campaign.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Still, UKIP 4th is a long way from the UK result as a whole. Would they get any MPs in Scotland on that sort of level of support when the Tories are already in panda territory?
Something occurs to me. It has been much touted on here that a Yes vote would have a very nice consolation prize for the Tories in EWNI of permanently losing the anti-Tory voting Scots. The same is true for UKIP but also the quickest way for UKIP to get the issue of the UK's membership of the EU into question is simply to support the Yes side. A Yes victory would necessitate negotiations between EWNI and the EU for EWNI's continuing membership. This is not to suggest whether EWNI is or is not the continuing UK: it is a practical point forced by the loss of such things as Scottish fishing resources (access to which was used by the UK Government to gain concessions in other areas). And once negotiations are forced ...
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
The detailed Scottish numbers will bare some close scrutiny but my first thoughts were that the Conservatives polled very decently, YES will be concerned and the Scottish LibDems polled better than some regions in England.
The main change of the bill was to increase the clnician input into commissioning services. This is working much better than I expected, with a much more positive and collaborative approach than Labours internal market.
I saw Andy Burnham speak on the subject last year, and he promised to work within the new structures. His only major proposal was to put local councillors on the boards to increase democratic accountability.
His more radical plans to integrate health and social care seems to have been vetoed by the two Eds, which is a pity.
Stripping out some of the worst aspects of the Lansley health bill for one.
But a lot of the moderating behind the scenes, in cabinet. Have no doubt that we would have had a much harder line government under a Conservative majority government.
Blaming the LibDems for Tory Policies and for the rise of UKIP is a bit perverse. In a coalition the junior partner can only get some of their policies through (e.g. the tax threshold rise) and stop some of the larger party's excesses. As for UKIP, the LDs attacked them but Labour was happy to see them taking votes off the Tories. Maybe now they'll wake up.
The Guardian has been a shill for the Liberal Democrats and the results of that party in government have been
Food banks Bedroom tax Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream Demonisation of the disabled is respectable Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria) The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
Great to see that the BNP have been wiped out altogether, and the LibDems reduced to just a single seat. It looks as if the public managed to see through Clegg's preposterous cozening and dissembling on Europe.
Labour needs to spend less time hating on the Lib Dems, and a bit more on understanding why a vast proportion of its core vote are now flirting outrageously with a party with a hard right agenda.
That's a good result for UKIP, not an earth shattering one. Given the polls they must have been secretly hoping for 30% plus. The Tories have done pretty well. Labour less well but just about OK. The LibDems - I'm struggling to see Anti-Frank's half full glass.
There's nothing in these results to suggest anything other than a Hung Parliament next year. MP numbers will depend on how the UKIP vote redistributes, whether Greens stick or twist and what Thursday's non-voters do. Labour may well get a slightly disproportionate boost from the latter two.
Straining hard, the Lib Dems got a seat. And they outpolled recent Survation polls in Scotland.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Salmond spent the last two weeks talking about nothing but UKIP and then last night complained that the BbC was responsible for their success by giving them too much coverage. Old fool.
Incidentally, for the purposes of the OfCom rules, there is no way that the LibDems will be a major party at the next European Parliamentary Elections, if the Green Party was not a major party in these elections.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Still, UKIP 4th is a long way from the UK result as a whole. Would they get any MPs in Scotland on that sort of level of support when the Tories are already in panda territory?
Something occurs to me. It has been much touted on here that a Yes vote would have a very nice consolation prize for the Tories in EWNI of permanently losing the anti-Tory voting Scots. The same is true for UKIP but also the quickest way for UKIP to get the issue of the UK's membership of the EU into question is simply to support the Yes side. A Yes victory would necessitate negotiations between EWNI and the EU for EWNI's continuing membership. This is not to suggest whether EWNI is or is not the continuing UK: it is a practical point forced by the loss of such things as Scottish fishing resources (access to which was used by the UK Government to gain concessions in other areas). And once negotiations are forced ...
That line of logic is reminiscent of the US Army spokesman in Vietnam who announced: 'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it'.
Labour needs to spend less time hating on the Lib Dems, and a bit more on understanding why a vast proportion of its core vote are now flirting outrageously with a party with a hard right agenda.
I genuinely don't think most of our "flirting with UKIP" voters actually know what UKIP policies are. What we heard on the doorstep was Labour people saying they wpuild vote for us at the GE but UKIP in the Euros to send a message. Have any Tory posters heard the same from their door knocking?
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
The great thing about the word "reform" is that it means something different to everybody. I'm still not sure what Cameron actually wants, but I'm pretty sure he's not demanding more protectionism and less globalization.
Oh of course but there has to be an opportunity to utilise the increased hostility to advantage the negotiations. I don't necessarily think it increases chances of successful negotiations but it may and it may be a means of widening the front on which renegotiation is attempted.
Maybe if you give us some examples of the kind of things you think Cameron wants, the centrist majority won't automatically spike and Syriza and the Front National will be helpful with that'll make it clearer.
We're promised that Cameron's EU negotiation will achieve great things but nobody is to know what they are.
Reminds me of that conman in the South Sea Bubble who set up a company which promised "an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is"
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Still depressing that they move from Lib Dem to UKIP. I find it hard to see why they would vote for an English Independence Party.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Salmond spent the last two weeks talking about nothing but UKIP and then last night complained that the BbC was responsible for their success by giving them too much coverage. Old fool.
And Nicola Sturgeon:
Nicola Sturgeon: 'Voting SNP is the only way to stop Ukip'
The remarks, which came at the SNP's European election manifesto launch in Edinburgh, suggest the party has moved from viewing Ukip as an irrelevance in Scotland to a genuine political contender.
Last year Alex Salmond dismissed Ukip's appeal north of the border by saying they "dislike everybody" and know "absolutely nothing about Scotland".
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
The detailed Scottish numbers will bare some close scrutiny but my first thoughts were that the Conservatives polled very decently, YES will be concerned and the Scottish LibDems polled better than some regions in England.
I don't see this having any bearing on the referendum , good to see Lib Dems wiped out but dire that UKIP get to 10%. SNP winning after so long in government shows how well they are doing even if it would have been better to get the 3rd seat.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
The great thing about the word "reform" is that it means something different to everybody. I'm still not sure what Cameron actually wants, but I'm pretty sure he's not demanding more protectionism and less globalization.
Oh of course but there has to be an opportunity to utilise the increased hostility to advantage the negotiations. I don't necessarily think it increases chances of successful negotiations but it may and it may be a means of widening the front on which renegotiation is attempted.
Maybe if you give us some examples of the kind of things you think Cameron wants, the centrist majority won't automatically spike and Syriza and the Front National will be helpful with that'll make it clearer.
We're promised that Cameron's EU negotiation will achieve great things but nobody is to know what they are.
Reminds me of that conman in the South Sea Bubble who set up a company which promised "an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is"
Don't worry. Whilst its 100% nailed on that ex Labour voters going UKIP will stay there, and bring their friends, its also 200% guaranteed that most Kipper voters will come home to the Tories as for seen by Vernon Bogdanor last night.
Apparently a promise of an unknown shopping list of reforms followed by a referendum in which the Tories would campaighn to stay in has big appeal to voters who don't like Europe and think Cameron is an untrustworthy liar who already broke the last pledge.
To ensure that this narrative is maintained the pollsters may well continue as they have so far with a 3 party model and UKIP not prompted.
Great to see that the BNP have been wiped out altogether, and the LibDems reduced to just a single seat. It looks as if the public managed to see through Clegg's preposterous cozening and dissembling on Europe.
Labour needs to spend less time hating on the Lib Dems, and a bit more on understanding why a vast proportion of its core vote are now flirting outrageously with a party with a hard right agenda.
Because a large part of the Labour vote has a hard right agenda. It's just that it's a hard right social agenda, not an economic one, a point the metropolitan liberal elite in all parties and commentariat neglect to consider or wilfully ignore.
Mr. G, didn't UKIP very nearly beat Labour in Wales? Calling UKIP English is what some Scots really hate: describing something British as English.
MD, but they really are and their only policy is UK out of EU. Can only assume they picked up people who want out of EU and especially the anti immigration people. You have to wonder at the mentality of the no immigration mob, who do they think will fund their welfare benefits in the future.
My ready reckoner (not sure where I saw it, so please correct me if I'm wrong) is that UKIP's +11 came largely from increased turnout (+5) and previous BNP voters (+6)
If this is the case, and that is replicated at a GE, doesn't that mean they could have a relatively limited impact in terms of seats?
I guess what you are looking for is where UKIP is currently within (BNP vote share + 5) of winning a seat. I know this is a little simplistic, but perhaps an interesting thought.
Not too disappointed the Lib Dems got a seat. May help keep Clegg in place.
There's no danger of Clegg going.
As I indicated way back in June 2010 they yellow peril were in this to the bitter end and basically bet the farm on events running their way in May 2015. They may still prove to be correct albeit with a diminished number of 40ish MP's -
Yes, we should celebrate the fact that our nutjobs aren't half as nutty as most of the nutjobs around the EU. Sitting here in Hungary, where a party that has had a paramilitary wing has tallied just under 20% of the vote, makes me appreciate that while UKIP are rancid and vile, they are merely highly reactionary and bigoted rather than outright threatening.
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
If you assume 25% of Labour and LDs will vote yes, then the balance of Indyref is far closer - about 45/55 if my mental arithmetic on the BBC data is correct - with some months to go. And remember that this does not allow for the impact of UKIP winning, and Labour only tying for 2nd equal with the Tories, and a majority of right-wing parties (not counting Labour) in the UK as a whole. The turnout is also about half of the likely Indyref turnout.
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
Carnyx, twisted Tory Scottish hating logic, apples and oranges points to pears.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
Salmond spent the last two weeks talking about nothing but UKIP and then last night complained that the BbC was responsible for their success by giving them too much coverage. Old fool.
And Nicola Sturgeon:
Nicola Sturgeon: 'Voting SNP is the only way to stop Ukip'
The remarks, which came at the SNP's European election manifesto launch in Edinburgh, suggest the party has moved from viewing Ukip as an irrelevance in Scotland to a genuine political contender.
Last year Alex Salmond dismissed Ukip's appeal north of the border by saying they "dislike everybody" and know "absolutely nothing about Scotland".
I see you are unwilling to discuss Tory thrashing in England, keep pointing north where UKIP got 10% and ignore the embarrassment of Tory thrashing down south.
Glass half full types for each party will see consolations, and glass half-empty types for each party will see disappointments. The great unanswered question: what would UKIP's share have been without the intense focus on it in the last week or so?
Probably lower.
The Great British Public tends to sympathise with puppies that are being kicked.
Labour needs to spend less time hating on the Lib Dems, and a bit more on understanding why a vast proportion of its core vote are now flirting outrageously with a party with a hard right agenda.
I will reserve judgement on whether they have a hard right agenda until I see their manifesto. They know they won't win votes off labour with uber thatcherism and, more importantly, they have gained so many members since 2010 that their 2010 manifesto can't be seen as a true reflection of the party.
The problem labour has is that some aspects of Thatcherism were very popular with their core voters, as Mrs Thatcher demonstrated, however a good chunk of their core would never vote tory EVER. That dosent apply to UKIP. I expect to see and hear from people like Paul Nuttal a lot over the next year.
I wonder if Boris might have chosen a happier metaphor than 'Peasant's revolt' to describe the success of UKIP and its disparate brethren across Europe:
Mr. G, they've won seats in England and Wales, and will pick up a seat in Scotland too.
I do wonder if this will affect how Scots and leftwing areas elsewhere view the Conservatives. Will they remain the evil baby-eaters, or will UKIP assume that mantle and the blues be seen as at least 'better than UKIP'.
Mr. W, the General Election's looking interesting.
Do we know if UKIP voters are more likely to vote at Euro elections than the other parties? If so would the 4.4 mil voters be the ceiling for a general election ~ 14.7%? Which doesn't quite seem high enough to gain more than half a dozen seats - less than the Sinn Fein no shows for instance - hardly a position of holding the balance of power?
Feel free to correct my logic - just pondering the question...
With the 'Referendum Period' starting in 4 days, the Weir's Euromillions have been spent....what is going to budge 'No's 10 point lead?
I think that's too specific a comparison between incommensurables. And as for what is going to budge it, I refer you to the bits of my posting you carefully deleted, and especially the impact of the new prospect of a right-wing government (and not just Labour) in Westminster for the foreseeable future.
The Tory vote holding up relatively well is a crumb of comfort, and suggests that there is still all to play for next year. One thing I've been considering is that the rise in support for parties who are to a greater or lesser degree eurosceptic across Europe may paradoxically strengthen Cameron's hand. It may make European governments more receptive to a case for reform.
The great thing about the word "reform" is that it means something different to everybody. I'm still not sure what Cameron actually wants, but I'm pretty sure he's not demanding more protectionism and less globalization.
Oh of course but there has to be an opportunity to utilise the increased hostility to advantage the negotiations. I don't necessarily think it increases chances of successful negotiations but it may and it may be a means of widening the front on which renegotiation is attempted.
Maybe if you give us some examples of the kind of things you think Cameron wants, the centrist majority won't automatically spike and Syriza and the Front National will be helpful with that'll make it clearer.
We're promised that Cameron's EU negotiation will achieve great things but nobody is to know what they are.
Reminds me of that conman in the South Sea Bubble who set up a company which promised "an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is"
Don't worry. Whilst its 100% nailed on that ex Labour voters going UKIP will stay there, and bring their friends, its also 200% guaranteed that most Kipper voters will come home to the Tories as for seen by Vernon Bogdanor last night.
Well this one won't be, EVER. And I am delighted that in Central Beds, comprising two ultra safe tory seats UKIP were top of the popular vote. - Nadine if you want my vote in 2015 you will only get it as a member of UKIP.
Labour needs to spend less time hating on the Lib Dems, and a bit more on understanding why a vast proportion of its core vote are now flirting outrageously with a party with a hard right agenda.
I genuinely don't think most of our "flirting with UKIP" voters actually know what UKIP policies are. What we heard on the doorstep was Labour people saying they wpuild vote for us at the GE but UKIP in the Euros to send a message. Have any Tory posters heard the same from their door knocking?
Yes, my worry though is that there's a clever bait and switch going on here, and that the proportion of the kipper vote that comes from Con will return home for the GE in a differentially higher proportion than ex Lab. This could be disastrous for Lab and they need to address explicitly the issues that resonate in WWC areas, immigration, meaningful jobs and pay, dismantling of councils and services etc, to stop it happening.
I wonder if Boris might have chosen a happier metaphor than 'Peasant's revolt' to describe the success of UKIP and its disparate brethren across Europe:
He at least is truthful and shows his complete disdain for ordinary people , the other Tory millionaire spivs just put on oily smiles and lie through their teeth.
Glass half full types for each party will see consolations, and glass half-empty types for each party will see disappointments. The great unanswered question: what would UKIP's share have been without the intense focus on it in the last week or so?
Much the same outside London, I should think. Inside London, I think it cost the party a second seat.
Comments
UKIP currently on 27.50% - may round down to 27% when Western Isles is added.
AIFE cost UKIP 2 seats if all their votes had gone to UKIP. Those 2 seats both went Green instead - lucky Greens!
LOL.
Other notable Scottish results:
- Not a single Scottish council area, out of 32, awarded any one party anything even close to a majority. The days when the SLab vote used to be weighed throughout west central Scotland are long over. The strongest single result was the SNP in Dundee (40.2%).
- SCON won in East Renfrewshire - Jim Murphy's seat
- the SLDs got just 14.2% in East Dunbartonshire - Jo Swinson's seat
- the SNP won Falkirk, the vacant IND seat
- SLAB just pipped the SNP in Edinburgh, by 0.1 points
City results:
Aberdeen City: SNP 15,412 (29.5%) Lab 12,420 (23.8%) Con 9824 (18.8%) UKIP 5025 (9.6%) LD 4605 (8.8%) Green 3723 (7.1%)
Dundee: SNP 13,573 (40.2%), Lab 9050 (26.8%) Con 4010 (11.9%) UKIP 2965 (8.8%) Green 2193 (6.5%) LD 1248 (3.7%)
Edinburgh: Lab 32,758 (23.1%) SNP 32,721 (23%) Con 27,554 (19.4%) Green 22,836 (16.1%) LD 12,575 (8.9%) UKIP 10,992 (7.7%)
Glasgow: Lab 45,676 (35.2%) SNP 37,820 (29.1%) Green 15,359 (11.8%) UKIP 12,638 (9.7%) Con 10,985 (8.5%) LD 6830 (3%)
31 out of 32 council areas declared:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/euro-elections-how-scotland-voted-area-by-area.1401053220
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jec6uNhtCJ_ZTmfrwhZ8MmUPmdj4BuFHXVVtT6cxNyM/edit
Strangely if last nights results were repeated in a GE www.electoralcalculus.co.uk predicts labour making 46 gains and being almost the same size as a Con \ UKIP block, with a rump LD and various nationalists deciding who governs. You'd imagine they'd go with Labour, in that circumstance
Surely the worst result all round ?
2) "YouGov were clear winners of the EP14 polling face."
(1) and (2) don't follow unless yougov subtracted an estimate for the AIFE effect (and UK EPP in London).
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/25/labour-local-elections-miliband-ukip-editorial
"He has done what those who elected him wanted him to do, rejecting the effort to appeal beyond the core vote at all costs in the Tony Blair manner to reiterate more traditional Labour and social democratic values."
"Whether the vagaries of a four-party battle on unreformed boundaries will allow Labour to win a Commons majority with a core vote strategy is one of the unknowns of the next 12 months. Whether winning with a percentage share in the low 30s would be sustainable in office is questionable. Like it or not, though, this has been Mr Miliband's strategy. It is a bit rich of his party to panic about it, when Mr Miliband is doing what he promised all along."
Food banks
Bedroom tax
Racism with a grin on its face is now mainstream
Demonisation of the disabled is respectable
Support for their pet project, the EU, is in ashes
The party of the crofters has now become the party of the lairds
The 'peace party' has become the 'war party' (Syria)
The dismantling of the welfare state stared by the old Liberal Party in connivance with their Tory buddies
The most reactionary party since at least 1832 won the most votes in a national election.....
They have a lot to answer for.
Yes 11/4 (various)
No 1/3 (various)
I wonder if we will see more tactical voting. I could see Tories who had all but given up in the North voting tactically (for UKIP) on a 'keep the weirdo out' ticket.
UKIP MEP in "social democratic Scotland" was certainly not in the YESNP's script....
Malta, pop 418,000 = 6 seats
Luxembourg pop 531,000 = 6 seats
Cyprus (southern) pop 839,000 = 6 seats
Estonia population 1.339 million = 6 seats
Latvia population 2.025 = 8 seats
Slovenia 2.058 million = 8 seats
Lithuania population 3 million = 11 seats
R of Ireland pop 4.6 million = 11 seats (nb compare with NI 1.8m pop = 3 seats)
Finland Population 5.4 million =13 seats
Slovakia population 5.4 million = 13 seats
Denmark Population 5.6 million = 13 seats
Sweden 9.6 million = 20 seats
Hungary 10 million =21 seats
Czech Republic 10.5 million = 21 seats
Combined population of this lot = 61.3 million, seats = 163
UK Population =63 million, seats = 74
So a lower population has more than twice the seats as the UK with Malta which has only 418,000 population having 6 seats with 70,000 population per seat (about the size of a small westminster consituency against UK with 851,000 population per seat, over ten times the size.
This is rotten to the core and also means that federalist countries like Luxembourg are disproportionately represented.
Separatist Parties: 37%
Unionist Parties: 63%
Now of course not all SLAB will vote no (tho the vast majority of Con will).......but it's hardly got "Yes landslide" written all over it....
There's nothing in these results to suggest anything other than a Hung Parliament next year. MP numbers will depend on how the UKIP vote redistributes, whether Greens stick or twist and what Thursday's non-voters do. Labour may well get a slightly disproportionate boost from the latter two.
Finally Scotland begins to loook a little better fron the Tory perspective - little sign also of a pro-independence surge.
But a lot of the moderating behind the scenes, in cabinet. Have no doubt that we would have had a much harder line government under a Conservative majority government.
For the first time in modern history neither labour or tories won an election and this is Just good?
Mind you the telegraph blogger who is claiming that the "Tory Machine Walked Away a Good Result" has to take the biscuit. The first time EVER the tories did not get first or second and it is a good result. Hate to think what a mediocre one would be.
As Nick Robinson suddenly stopped mid conversation and pointed out when the panel were earnestly discussing how many seats UKIP would get at this election, such a conservation would have been incredible only a few weeks ago.
PS - apologies for accidently clicking off topic, pressed wrong button.
Although my ARSE did not cover the Euro Elections the JackW prediction of :
Ukip 27% .. Lab 24% .. Con 22% .. Green 8% .. LibDem 8%
wasn't too shabby.
I'm hoping to put all the local/Euro numbers into ARSE by Wednesday to issue the latest ARSE 2015 GE prediction by Thursday. I also hope to name all the "JackW Dozen" - 13 constituencies that will determine the shape of the GE - by a week tomorrow.
Inheritance tax cuts for millionaires
• Bringing back O-levels
• A two-tier education system
• Profit-making in state schools
• New childcare ratios
• Firing workers at will, without any reasons given
• Regional pay penalising public sector workers in the north
• Scrapping housing benefit for young people
• Ditching the Human Rights Act
• Weakening the protections in the Equalities Act
• Closing down the debate on Trident
• Parliamentary boundary changes
• Scrapping Natural England
• Holding back green energy
• Stopping geography teachers telling children about how we can tackle climate change
• The snoopers' charter (draft communications data bill)
And remember it is not Indyref but an election - where the governing party held on to its vote in mid term. Certainly mixed news but not that much of a change except for LDs and UKIP. [edted to remove stray text] I'm not sure I would be too happy if I were Mr Miliband.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/trident-may-be-retained-after-labour-rejects-lib-dem-idea-of-three-nuclear-subs-8710216.html
YH continues to drift rightwards and NW leftwards.
Take into account in any constituency bets.
PS. I have to say though that UKIP getting a seat in Scotland is very depressing, have to wonder what cretins voted that way.
I know Scotland's result won't officially come in until later today but is it looking like UKIP will win a seat there?
Under FPTP with what we saw last night its almost a lottery. Its going to reinforce the reality of this electoral system that national percentage shares and proportion of seats really have no meaning. Funnily enough Farage understands this better than anyone, and I think we're going to see them win more than the zero seats so many of you confidently state they will win based on 3 party thinking and national swings.
According to Wiki turnout in 2009 was 34.7% and turnout this time according to the BBC is 34.19%. I think I might have won my bet with Nick after all which is a bit unexpected to be honest.
Some of the factors on which I based my assessment have certainly been proven to be correct. The Labour vote where there were no other elections has not bothered. UKIP has not caused a surge in the NOTA who sat on their arses as usual. The LIb Dems face an extinction event and the tories turned out with heavy hearts on the back of quite a good internet campaign.
Something occurs to me. It has been much touted on here that a Yes vote would have a very nice consolation prize for the Tories in EWNI of permanently losing the anti-Tory voting Scots. The same is true for UKIP but also the quickest way for UKIP to get the issue of the UK's membership of the EU into question is simply to support the Yes side. A Yes victory would necessitate negotiations between EWNI and the EU for EWNI's continuing membership. This is not to suggest whether EWNI is or is not the continuing UK: it is a practical point forced by the loss of such things as Scottish fishing resources (access to which was used by the UK Government to gain concessions in other areas). And once negotiations are forced ...
I saw Andy Burnham speak on the subject last year, and he promised to work within the new structures. His only major proposal was to put local councillors on the boards to increase democratic accountability.
His more radical plans to integrate health and social care seems to have been vetoed by the two Eds, which is a pity.
http://tinyurl.com/lr7aq8v
With the 'Referendum Period' starting in 4 days, the Weir's Euromillions have been spent....what is going to budge 'No's 10 point lead?
Ukip will take the last seat ahead of the SNP regardless of the numbers yet to come in from the Western Isles.
OK, that's all pretty desperate.
Reminds me of that conman in the South Sea Bubble who set up a company which promised "an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is"
Not too disappointed the Lib Dems got a seat. May help keep Clegg in place.
Something ISN'T 'A Victory for Eck'!
I may have to lie down.....
Nicola Sturgeon: 'Voting SNP is the only way to stop Ukip'
The remarks, which came at the SNP's European election manifesto launch in Edinburgh, suggest the party has moved from viewing Ukip as an irrelevance in Scotland to a genuine political contender.
Last year Alex Salmond dismissed Ukip's appeal north of the border by saying they "dislike everybody" and know "absolutely nothing about Scotland".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/10831966/Nicola-Sturgeon-Voting-SNP-is-the-only-way-to-stop-Ukip.html
Apparently a promise of an unknown shopping list of reforms followed by a referendum in which the Tories would campaighn to stay in has big appeal to voters who don't like Europe and think Cameron is an untrustworthy liar who already broke the last pledge.
To ensure that this narrative is maintained the pollsters may well continue as they have so far with a 3 party model and UKIP not prompted.
I share your delight at the collapse of the BNP. Down from 6.3% to 1.1% is quite something, and for all his faults Farage is no Nick Griffin.
You have to wonder at the mentality of the no immigration mob, who do they think will fund their welfare benefits in the future.
If this is the case, and that is replicated at a GE, doesn't that mean they could have a relatively limited impact in terms of seats?
I guess what you are looking for is where UKIP is currently within (BNP vote share + 5) of winning a seat. I know this is a little simplistic, but perhaps an interesting thought.
As I indicated way back in June 2010 they yellow peril were in this to the bitter end and basically bet the farm on events running their way in May 2015. They may still prove to be correct albeit with a diminished number of 40ish MP's -
The Great British Public tends to sympathise with puppies that are being kicked.
The problem labour has is that some aspects of Thatcherism were very popular with their core voters, as Mrs Thatcher demonstrated, however a good chunk of their core would never vote tory EVER. That dosent apply to UKIP. I expect to see and hear from people like Paul Nuttal a lot over the next year.
Labour have a major headache.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/10855860/European-elections-2014-This-is-one-peasants-revolt-that-Brussels-cant-just-brush-aside.html
I do wonder if this will affect how Scots and leftwing areas elsewhere view the Conservatives. Will they remain the evil baby-eaters, or will UKIP assume that mantle and the blues be seen as at least 'better than UKIP'.
Mr. W, the General Election's looking interesting.
Feel free to correct my logic - just pondering the question...
For months, I've assumed UKIP would poll 25-30%..