Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Will the UK’s unelected ruler take the advice of America’s unelected ruler? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,254
edited January 3 in General
Will the UK’s unelected ruler take the advice of America’s unelected ruler? – politicalbetting.com

Given the dark history of the Royal Family when it comes to coups (King Edward VIII would have been installed as King if the Nazis had invaded and Lord Mountbatten (the current King’s mentor) was touted to become PM if a coup against Harold Wilson succeeded, or Queen Elizabeth II’s disgraceful role in the sacking of Gough Whitlam I can understand why Elon Musk has tweeted this.

Read the full story here

«13456

Comments

  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,888
    QTWTAIN
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,966
    Given what we know of King Charles opinions - expressed through his known interest in minority communities and faiths etc - I think it safe to say that he is utterly opposed to such a suggestion.
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,826
    edited January 3
    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,489
    Alex Wickham, now of Bloomberg News, with the story that British politicians from both Tories and Reform have been reaching out to allies within Trump’s team about Elon Musk and “Tommy Robinson”.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-03/uk-right-warns-trump-allies-that-musk-s-posts-have-gone-too-far
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,888
    Sandpit said:

    Alex Wickham, now of Bloomberg News, with the story that British politicians from both Tories and Reform have been reaching out to allies within Trump’s team about Elon Musk and “Tommy Robinson”.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-03/uk-right-warns-trump-allies-that-musk-s-posts-have-gone-too-far

    Hopefully to tell them to muzzle their mad dog.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,966

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,826
    edited January 3
    The conservatives are still in deep political trouble as well and need to stop the Reform bandwagon. I voted Reform last election so not that fussed if they do not but one way to stop it might be to persuade Sunak to step down as an MP - If the tories are going to win a by -election, currently Richmond is about the best seat they can do it in .This may steady leakage to Reform
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,700

    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Kemi jumps on the bandwagon:

    https://x.com/kemibadenoch/status/1874749990842814606

    The time is long overdue for a full national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal.

    Trials have taken place all over the country in recent years but no one in authority has joined the dots.

    2025 must be the year that the victims start to get justice.

    Oh FFS!

    Here is the IICSA website - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/index.html.

    Could someone in her party send her the link? Or tell her about the Drew Review and Operation Stovewood by the NCA. Or the Jay report or what Dame Louise Casey has done?

    Or remind her of what her fellow Cabinet Minister, Suellla Braverman, the Home Secretary to do in May 2023 when the final IICSA Report came out?

    This is bandwagon jumping of the most tawdry kind instead of action - which she could have been asking for when she was an actual Cabinet Minister.
    What magnificent results have these reports and enquiries produced?
    The IICSA Report - nothing because the government - disgracefully - refused to take action on its recommendations. See https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/05/24/kicking-issues-into-the-long-grass/

    The Drew Review was used to improve the approach of South Yorkshire Police.

    Operation Stovewood: run by the NCA is the largest criminal enforcement investigation into non-family CSE. It has identified 1100 victims, has 50 investigations outstanding and has led to 36 convictions.

    The Jay Report was used to improve services within Rotherham Council which was put into special measures. The council leader and head of children's services left.

    It is something. By no means enough, of course.

    But what actual use will yet another inquiry costing millions, reporting in a decade or so and telling us stuff we already know be? Because my suspicion is that this is not really about joining dots or understanding the manifold causes of male sexual violence - let alone taking effective action against it - but political point-scoring and a disguised fight about immigration, in which the needs of the victims - girls mostly - will largely be ignored.
    Kemi is absolutely right to demand a full public enquiry. We quite rightly had one when postmasters' lives and livelihoods were ruined by public servants whose actions bordered on criminal. The victims of the grooming gangs deserve just as much justice, and the enablers of this abuse must be made to answer for their behaviour, and the causes brought into the open and eliminated from the public sphere.

    This initiative is aligned to Kemi's long-held public stances on culture, and the stress she places on public bodies that don't work. It isn't just necessary, it feels authentic to her and what she stands for.
    🙂‍↔️ you are clueless.

    Kemi is in an official office, but the front page of today’s Daily Telegraph and Musk on X decides strategy and positions for her?

    Then Kemi MUST lead at PMQs asking: how many beloved pets have been stolen and eaten by these outsiders to our country, for sure that hell is warmer than North Yorkshire today Bobby J will ask exactly this, at any moment.

    This politics is developing just as awful for the Conservatives and their leader as could possibly have feared - ‘voting blocks’ on the marmite questions at the next General Election that favours Labour and Libdems mopping up seats from small % of votes from shrinking turnouts.

    All Kemi’s questions at the next PMQs, at ALL PMQs this year, must flag to voters how an incoming government inherited a growing economy, that will now have absolutely no growth for the whole of 2025! leading to higher taxes and more borrowing to fill the expanding black hole.

    Kemi should look to today’s FT front page, not the DT.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,059
    Another GE is not going to happen before 2029, but what we are witnessing is disunity and bitterness growing at a fearful rate with unknown consequences

    Social media is virtually out of control with Musk pouring petrol on the flames

    We can jump.up and down and shout to the heavens, but what we really need is good governance and I do not see where that is coming from

    Very difficult times ahead
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810

    The conservatives are still in deep political trouble and need to stop the Reform bandwagon. I voted Reform last election so not that fussed if they do not but one way to stop it might be to persuade Sunak to step down as an MP - If the tories are going to win a by -election currently Richmond is about the best candidate .This may steady leakage to Reform

    Reform are only a superficial threat to the Tories. It's Labour for whom they are existential because they are claiming the mantle of defending the interests of the British working class against those who, in the name of ideology, think their interests should take second place.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114
    What role in the sacking of Gough Whitlam? As far as I'm aware she didn't even get told about it until it had happened although Kerr asked her private secretary if she had any views on the crisis.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,766
    If Musk is not careful he will derail my Starmer will resign bet. SKS will not want it to look like he was forced out.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,759
    This has to be one of the most depressing PB threads.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,203

    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Kemi jumps on the bandwagon:

    https://x.com/kemibadenoch/status/1874749990842814606

    The time is long overdue for a full national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal.

    Trials have taken place all over the country in recent years but no one in authority has joined the dots.

    2025 must be the year that the victims start to get justice.

    Oh FFS!

    Here is the IICSA website - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/index.html.

    Could someone in her party send her the link? Or tell her about the Drew Review and Operation Stovewood by the NCA. Or the Jay report or what Dame Louise Casey has done?

    Or remind her of what her fellow Cabinet Minister, Suellla Braverman, the Home Secretary to do in May 2023 when the final IICSA Report came out?

    This is bandwagon jumping of the most tawdry kind instead of action - which she could have been asking for when she was an actual Cabinet Minister.
    What magnificent results have these reports and enquiries produced?
    The IICSA Report - nothing because the government - disgracefully - refused to take action on its recommendations. See https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/05/24/kicking-issues-into-the-long-grass/

    The Drew Review was used to improve the approach of South Yorkshire Police.

    Operation Stovewood: run by the NCA is the largest criminal enforcement investigation into non-family CSE. It has identified 1100 victims, has 50 investigations outstanding and has led to 36 convictions.

    The Jay Report was used to improve services within Rotherham Council which was put into special measures. The council leader and head of children's services left.

    It is something. By no means enough, of course.

    But what actual use will yet another inquiry costing millions, reporting in a decade or so and telling us stuff we already know be? Because my suspicion is that this is not really about joining dots or understanding the manifold causes of male sexual violence - let alone taking effective action against it - but political point-scoring and a disguised fight about immigration, in which the needs of the victims - girls mostly - will largely be ignored.
    Kemi is absolutely right to demand a full public enquiry. We quite rightly had one when postmasters' lives and livelihoods were ruined by public servants whose actions bordered on criminal. The victims of the grooming gangs deserve just as much justice, and the enablers of this abuse must be made to answer for their behaviour, and the causes brought into the open and eliminated from the public sphere.

    This initiative is aligned to Kemi's long-held public stances on culture, and the stress she places on public bodies that don't work. It isn't just necessary, it feels authentic to her and what she stands for.
    🙂‍↔️ you are clueless.

    Kemi is in an official office, but the front page of today’s Daily Telegraph and Musk on X decides strategy and positions for her?

    Then Kemi MUST lead at PMQs asking: how many beloved pets have been stolen and eaten by these outsiders to our country, for sure that hell is warmer than North Yorkshire today Bobby J will ask exactly this, at any moment.

    This politics is developing just as awful for the Conservatives and their leader as could possibly have feared - ‘voting blocks’ on the marmite questions at the next General Election that favours Labour and Libdems mopping up seats from small % of votes from shrinking turnouts.

    All Kemi’s questions at the next PMQs, at ALL PMQs this year, must flag to voters how an incoming government inherited a growing economy, that will now have absolutely no growth for the whole of 2025! leading to higher taxes and more borrowing to fill the expanding black hole.

    Kemi should look to today’s FT front page, not the DT.
    I think comparing the very real nightmare of gang-raped girls to rumours about Haitans eating pets is a bit rich for my blood to be honest, whether that was your intention or not.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    Cicero said:

    The more that riches to mega riches Musk tells us what to do, the more I think "Behind every great fortune there lies a great crime". I didn't vote Labour but my response to some foreigner trying to interfere and meddle in our politics with cash and free publicity for Farage is "Get tae fuck".

    Why do I have the feeling that if some European industrialist were telling the British people to reverse Brexit, you would have a different reaction?
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,203

    The conservatives are still in deep political trouble and need to stop the Reform bandwagon. I voted Reform last election so not that fussed if they do not but one way to stop it might be to persuade Sunak to step down as an MP - If the tories are going to win a by -election currently Richmond is about the best candidate .This may steady leakage to Reform

    Reform are only a superficial threat to the Tories. It's Labour for whom they are existential because they are claiming the mantle of defending the interests of the British working class against those who, in the name of ideology, think their interests should take second place.
    Perhaps we will have the Tories and Reform as Government and official opposition.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,935

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken semi seriously.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,315
    edited January 3
    ydoethur said:

    What role in the sacking of Gough Whitlam? As far as I'm aware she didn't even get told about it until it had happened although Kerr asked her private secretary if she had any views on the crisis.

    Sir John Kerr asked the Palace if he had the authority to sack Whitlam, he was told he did, it is incredible to believe this wasn't discussed with Her Majesty.

    Plus her son (and current King) endorsed the sacking.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/24/prince-charless-letter-to-john-kerr-reportedly-endorsing-sacking-of-whitlam-condemned

  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,935
    Sandpit said:

    Alex Wickham, now of Bloomberg News, with the story that British politicians from both Tories and Reform have been reaching out to allies within Trump’s team about Elon Musk and “Tommy Robinson”.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-03/uk-right-warns-trump-allies-that-musk-s-posts-have-gone-too-far

    Interesting. So, will Musk pay any attention? I presume not. Although he may just randomly move on to another topic, wade into a different row.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,551

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114
    edited January 3

    ydoethur said:

    What role in the sacking of Gough Whitlam? As far as I'm aware she didn't even get told about it until it had happened although Kerr asked her private secretary if she had any views on the crisis.

    sir John Kerr asked the Palace if he had the authority to sack Whitlam, he was told he did, it is incredible to believe this wasn't discussed with Her Majesty.

    Plus her son (and current King) endorsed the sacking.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/24/prince-charless-letter-to-john-kerr-reportedly-endorsing-sacking-of-whitlam-condemned

    I think that's a rather - novel - interpretation of what happened. Rather, Charles and then Charteris were asked what would happen if Whitlam asked the Queen to sack the Governor General because the Governor General had tried to sack the Prime Minister, to which the answer was even though the Queen wouldn't be happy about it she would in a contest have to follow the advice of the Prime Minister.

    (That does get rather murky if the Prime Minister had been sacked, but the convention would be I think to go with the elected rather than appointed PM.)

    Truthfully I don't think anyone comes terribly well out of the farrago - Whitlam was recklessly arrogant to the point of unconstitutionality, Fraser was utterly cynical to the same degree, Kerr showed atrocious judgement and moral cowardice throughout - but it's hard to say that the Queen was deeply implicated.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,966
    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    True. So if the entire front bench defects to MAGA, election? Maybe?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    Interesting. I’ve been trying to work out if the explosion in the gang rapes scandal could bring down the government. Sadly, I don’t think it can, even though the scandal is monumental and profound.

    However it will haunt labour until the next election and it could easily damage and even end individual careers.
  • state_go_awaystate_go_away Posts: 5,826
    edited January 3
    I think the Musk thing is well overblown. He is known for saying what he wants over many years . Most people note it and move on . It may well just be a reaction to a lot of labour staff overtly supporting the democrats in the US election. Farage is astute enough to not get too drawn in and will concentrate more on more mainstream issues turning out to be crap -uncontrolled immigration IS mainstream btw
  • Jim_MillerJim_Miller Posts: 3,079
    Reposted from previous thread: Sandpit - Thanks for the info on Epstein's victims. Though it reinforces my view that many of our problems have been worsened by our weakened families. Which are difficult for governments to fix.

    In return, a story common among boys and young men in my youth: The boy calls at the family home for a first date. At that time it was common, at least in middle class families for her father to have a talk with the boy, before the girl came down to meet him. The boy and their father have their talk -- and the boy can't help noticing that the father is in the middle of cleaning and oiling his gun. Nothing is said, and nothing need be.

    (Did such things actually happen? Sure, though I have no idea how often.)
  • FossFoss Posts: 1,093
    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    It wouldn’t be ideal for Party moral tho’.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906

    Sandpit said:

    Alex Wickham, now of Bloomberg News, with the story that British politicians from both Tories and Reform have been reaching out to allies within Trump’s team about Elon Musk and “Tommy Robinson”.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-03/uk-right-warns-trump-allies-that-musk-s-posts-have-gone-too-far

    Interesting. So, will Musk pay any attention? I presume not. Although he may just randomly move on to another topic, wade into a different row.
    Time for HYUFD to call for the enforcement of the Treason Felony Act 1848, which is still on the books.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 43,171
    It's a shame somebody who we seem obliged to hear from all day every day says so little of any merit. We need to locate a mute button.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    edited January 3
    What happened that suddenly wealth is now revered? It used to be considered vulgar particularly if paraded as is the case with Musk.

    Poor old George Soros was called all sorts of names for his wealth though he certainly didn't parade it.

    I remember visiting a garden centre on Cap ferrat and I noticed that there was a security man talking into his sleeve on the gate next door. I asked who was living there and he said the man wanted complete anonymity but he was an extremely nice but shy man. It was only several years later when they reported his death that I learnt it was Paul Allen
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906

    Cicero said:

    The more that riches to mega riches Musk tells us what to do, the more I think "Behind every great fortune there lies a great crime". I didn't vote Labour but my response to some foreigner trying to interfere and meddle in our politics with cash and free publicity for Farage is "Get tae fuck".

    Why do I have the feeling that if some European industrialist were telling the British people to reverse Brexit, you would have a different reaction?
    Not really.
    It's not up to such a hypothetical individual.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,935
    kinabalu said:

    It's a shame somebody who we seem obliged to hear from all day every day says so little of any merit. We need to locate a mute button.

    Absolutely.

    Oh... you mean Musk!

    Yes, him too.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,980

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    Although even if the House voted for an election, that doesn't mean there would be one. The power to call elections lies with the Executive, not the Legislature.

    That said, if the House *did* vote for an election, and the PM ignored it, you'd expect that a Confidence vote would be held within days.
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 4,689
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    What role in the sacking of Gough Whitlam? As far as I'm aware she didn't even get told about it until it had happened although Kerr asked her private secretary if she had any views on the crisis.

    sir John Kerr asked the Palace if he had the authority to sack Whitlam, he was told he did, it is incredible to believe this wasn't discussed with Her Majesty.

    Plus her son (and current King) endorsed the sacking.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/24/prince-charless-letter-to-john-kerr-reportedly-endorsing-sacking-of-whitlam-condemned

    I think that's a rather - novel - interpretation of what happened. Rather, Charles and then Charteris were asked what would happen if Whitlam asked the Queen to sack the Governor General because the Governor General had tried to sack the Prime Minister, to which the answer was even though the Queen wouldn't be happy about it she would in a contest have to follow the advice of the Prime Minister.

    (That does get rather murky if the Prime Minister had been sacked, but the convention would be I think to go with the elected rather than appointed PM.)

    Truthfully I don't think anyone comes terribly well out of the farrago - Whitlam was recklessly arrogant to the point of unconstitutionality, Fraser was utterly cynical to the same degree, Kerr showed atrocious judgement and moral cowardice throughout - but it's hard to say that the Queen was deeply implicated.
    I was only a teenager at the time but I still remember the soundbite - "Kerr's cur".
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,980
    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    It's bollocks. Labour doesn't remove anyone. Ever. They do talk about it a lot though.

    Well, they did remove MacDonald but that was only after he'd literally walked out on them and set up government with the Tories.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    What role in the sacking of Gough Whitlam? As far as I'm aware she didn't even get told about it until it had happened although Kerr asked her private secretary if she had any views on the crisis.

    sir John Kerr asked the Palace if he had the authority to sack Whitlam, he was told he did, it is incredible to believe this wasn't discussed with Her Majesty.

    Plus her son (and current King) endorsed the sacking.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/24/prince-charless-letter-to-john-kerr-reportedly-endorsing-sacking-of-whitlam-condemned

    I think that's a rather - novel - interpretation of what happened. Rather, Charles and then Charteris were asked what would happen if Whitlam asked the Queen to sack the Governor General because the Governor General had tried to sack the Prime Minister, to which the answer was even though the Queen wouldn't be happy about it she would in a contest have to follow the advice of the Prime Minister.

    (That does get rather murky if the Prime Minister had been sacked, but the convention would be I think to go with the elected rather than appointed PM.)

    Truthfully I don't think anyone comes terribly well out of the farrago - Whitlam was recklessly arrogant to the point of unconstitutionality, Fraser was utterly cynical to the same degree, Kerr showed atrocious judgement and moral cowardice throughout - but it's hard to say that the Queen was deeply implicated.
    I was only a teenager at the time but I still remember the soundbite - "Kerr's cur".
    Well, he chewed Whitlam up and spat him out at the election...
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,110
    edited January 3
    Last day of the holidays. Watching the Lockerbie thing - its very good.

    Well, I say last day of the holidays. I've only a had a few days off doing work of some description. Just that none of it has been for clients.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    edited January 3

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    Bullshit replying to concocted bullshit
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 43,171

    kinabalu said:

    It's a shame somebody who we seem obliged to hear from all day every day says so little of any merit. We need to locate a mute button.

    Absolutely.

    Oh... you mean Musk!

    Yes, him too.
    I set em up. Assists beat goals for the cognescenti.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    Silly boy.

    The ideological project which is in trouble is your beloved Brexit.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    edited January 3

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    It's bollocks. Labour doesn't remove anyone. Ever. They do talk about it a lot though.

    Well, they did remove MacDonald but that was only after he'd literally walked out on them and set up government with the Tories.
    Yes, that occurred to me. However my friend made one good point to back up his thesis. No one likes Starmer, even inside Labour. Corbyn had fans. Blair had disciples. Brown had a coterie

    Starmer is quite the loner and has no ideological group around him, he’s also got zero rizz and no charm

    Maybe he will be the exception that proves the rule, but I don’t put chances of his going higher than 15%. Unless there’s a scandal
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    Silly boy.

    The ideological project which is in trouble is your beloved Brexit.
    What is the ideology behind Brexit?
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,110

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    edited January 3
    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    It is so absurd from so many angles not least that you would know a "Labour insider" that you'd be better off keeping shtum!
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,766
    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    As posted ad nauseam, I expect Starmer to resign like Harold Wilson.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,315
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    It is so absurd from so many angles not least that you would know a Labour insider that you'd be better off keeping shtum!
    Wait until you hear the Labour insider’s story was confirmed by an Albanian taxi driver.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,059
    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,980
    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    FWIW, I believe Leon. I don't believe his friend's prediction because - as I noted below - Labour doesn't remove its leaders (not least because it doesn't really have the mechanism to do so).
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,315

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    As posted ad nauseam, I expect Starmer to resign like Harold Wilson.
    What, you mean after his fourth general election victory ?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    It is so absurd from so many angles not least that you would know a Labour insider that you'd be better off keeping shtum!
    He’s a member of Camden Labour and his partner knows Starmer well and is active. I’ll leave it at that
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,059
    Wes Streeting urges households to turn their heating on this weekend

    If true to form this could be the weekend the media concentrate on shivering pensioners !!!!
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 43,171

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
    No, as we've seen over the last 14 years, the Tories are part of the problem and are just as much in thrawl to the same ideology. Putting the Tories back in charge wouldn't help at all.
    It's easier to critique capitalism than design a realistic alternative tbf.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,700

    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Kemi jumps on the bandwagon:

    https://x.com/kemibadenoch/status/1874749990842814606

    The time is long overdue for a full national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal.

    Trials have taken place all over the country in recent years but no one in authority has joined the dots.

    2025 must be the year that the victims start to get justice.

    Oh FFS!

    Here is the IICSA website - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/index.html.

    Could someone in her party send her the link? Or tell her about the Drew Review and Operation Stovewood by the NCA. Or the Jay report or what Dame Louise Casey has done?

    Or remind her of what her fellow Cabinet Minister, Suellla Braverman, the Home Secretary to do in May 2023 when the final IICSA Report came out?

    This is bandwagon jumping of the most tawdry kind instead of action - which she could have been asking for when she was an actual Cabinet Minister.
    What magnificent results have these reports and enquiries produced?
    The IICSA Report - nothing because the government - disgracefully - refused to take action on its recommendations. See https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/05/24/kicking-issues-into-the-long-grass/

    The Drew Review was used to improve the approach of South Yorkshire Police.

    Operation Stovewood: run by the NCA is the largest criminal enforcement investigation into non-family CSE. It has identified 1100 victims, has 50 investigations outstanding and has led to 36 convictions.

    The Jay Report was used to improve services within Rotherham Council which was put into special measures. The council leader and head of children's services left.

    It is something. By no means enough, of course.

    But what actual use will yet another inquiry costing millions, reporting in a decade or so and telling us stuff we already know be? Because my suspicion is that this is not really about joining dots or understanding the manifold causes of male sexual violence - let alone taking effective action against it - but political point-scoring and a disguised fight about immigration, in which the needs of the victims - girls mostly - will largely be ignored.
    Kemi is absolutely right to demand a full public enquiry. We quite rightly had one when postmasters' lives and livelihoods were ruined by public servants whose actions bordered on criminal. The victims of the grooming gangs deserve just as much justice, and the enablers of this abuse must be made to answer for their behaviour, and the causes brought into the open and eliminated from the public sphere.

    This initiative is aligned to Kemi's long-held public stances on culture, and the stress she places on public bodies that don't work. It isn't just necessary, it feels authentic to her and what she stands for.
    🙂‍↔️ you are clueless.

    Kemi is in an official office, but the front page of today’s Daily Telegraph and Musk on X decides strategy and positions for her?

    Then Kemi MUST lead at PMQs asking: how many beloved pets have been stolen and eaten by these outsiders to our country, for sure that hell is warmer than North Yorkshire today Bobby J will ask exactly this, at any moment.

    This politics is developing just as awful for the Conservatives and their leader as could possibly have feared - ‘voting blocks’ on the marmite questions at the next General Election that favours Labour and Libdems mopping up seats from small % of votes from shrinking turnouts.

    All Kemi’s questions at the next PMQs, at ALL PMQs this year, must flag to voters how an incoming government inherited a growing economy, that will now have absolutely no growth for the whole of 2025! leading to higher taxes and more borrowing to fill the expanding black hole.

    Kemi should look to today’s FT front page, not the DT.
    I think comparing the very real nightmare of gang-raped girls to rumours about Haitans eating pets is a bit rich for my blood to be honest, whether that was your intention or not.
    There’s a goat gone missing around here, a much beloved family pet. Are you not thinking what we are all thinking about what’s happened to it? 🐐

    It’s “that lot” over there - outsiders surging into our community, responsible for ALL the bad things, from no decent housing or dentists, to grooming gangs, and pets eaten.

    If we tolerate this, our own families will be next.

    Plus the fact Starmer was head of the criminal justice system, so any enquiry is really all about asking him why he failed us.

    The intention is pointing out to everyone, you are a fellow traveller with fascism.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,906

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    Silly boy.

    The ideological project which is in trouble is your beloved Brexit.
    What is the ideology behind Brexit?
    Neo-poujadism.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    kinabalu said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
    No, as we've seen over the last 14 years, the Tories are part of the problem and are just as much in thrawl to the same ideology. Putting the Tories back in charge wouldn't help at all.
    It's easier to critique capitalism than design a realistic alternative tbf.
    Is this a feature of capitalism?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/10/birmingham-city-council-agrees-deal-over-equal-pay-claims

    Birmingham city council has reached an agreement to settle historical equal pay claims that left the authority with liabilities estimated at £760m and pushed it into effective bankruptcy.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    This is one way the rape gangs story will haunt Labour


    “Starmer ‘guilty as anyone I know’, says grooming gang whistleblower

    Ex-detective Maggie Oliver thinks PM must bear some responsibility for widespread failure to bring those responsible to justice”

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/03/starmer-ddp-grooming-gangs-police-maggie-oliver/
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,110

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
    No, as we've seen over the last 14 years, the Tories are part of the problem and are just as much in thrawl to the same ideology. Putting the Tories back in charge wouldn't help at all.
    I'm glad to hear you confirm that.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,980
    edited January 3
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    It's bollocks. Labour doesn't remove anyone. Ever. They do talk about it a lot though.

    Well, they did remove MacDonald but that was only after he'd literally walked out on them and set up government with the Tories.
    Yes, that occurred to me. However my friend made one good point to back up his thesis. No one likes Starmer, even inside Labour. Corbyn had fans. Blair had disciples. Brown had a coterie

    Starmer is quite the loner and has no ideological group around him, he’s also got zero rizz and no charm

    Maybe he will be the exception that proves the rule, but I don’t put chances of his going higher than 15%. Unless there’s a scandal
    I tend to agree with that.

    However, I'll roll out again my five-point model for when leaders are replaced. Each* point of these has to be fulfilled before a party dumps its leader.

    1. A general sense within the party that things are so bad that a change of leader may be or is necessary;
    2. A crisis to spark MPs or cabinet ministers into action;
    3. A viable mechanism by which the replacement can occur;
    4. At least one potential successor who MPs can be confident would likely make the situation better;
    5. No potential successors with a reasonable chance of winning who would likely make things worse.

    These aren't binary conditions: there are areas of grey between 'this applies' and 'no it doesn't' but at the moment I don't think we can tick any of those boxes with confidence.

    * In a really serious crisis, point 5 might not apply - the party might roll the dice with disaster looming even if there's a good chance that doing so could produce an even bigger one - but at the very least, such a scenario would add a good deal of caution into thinking.
  • Alphabet_SoupAlphabet_Soup Posts: 3,375
    If anyone has a view of the western sky at the moment, Venus is dancing attendance on the crescent moon in a spectacular way. Not for long.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,700
    On topic. And the bottom line to all this. Cause no one can sum this shit up better than me. though Dura Ace take would probably be pretty good and to the point.

    Trump and Musk have always funded, supported and voted Democrat, to the day they realised an opportunity for power opening up, that makes them personally much much richer at the expense of America and its people - who Trump and Musk are quite obviously out to fleece and piss on.

    The alt right gobbles up all the BS in this alt media age, as they are people who haven’t a clue how to think for themselves like we can - take Leon on PB as perfect example of someone who can’t actually do politics simply because he’s too much a vulgarian at heart - in same way the Dems would never have made Trump and Musk their leaders, or allowed them to use the dummy’s guide to fascism playbook.

    But Musk can’t do it. Lacking Trumps charisma, Musk is just gauche, weird and clumsy at using fascism. Musk is like trying to copy the master casserole maker (that’s me actually) but creating some weird tasting gruel disaster which you wouldn’t even want to be left alone in a room with, let alone swallow when he puts it in your mouth.

    Musk is literally a laughing stock.
  • RazedabodeRazedabode Posts: 3,045
    Musk is looking deranged on X. But I think the mood on there captures *something* that has changed and won’t be going away - and I’ve no idea where it leads

    What I do know is that people evidently voted for change / something different, and what it appears is happening with Labour in government is barely any different. The system we have in this country just isn’t fit for purpose.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,637

    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!

    So Labour still in first place, then?

    The ghost of Lady Thatcher is telling them that they're not trying hard enough to be unpopular.

    Meanwhile, and on thread, who on the centre-right or right is going to call out this madness?
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,700

    If anyone has a view of the western sky at the moment, Venus is dancing attendance on the crescent moon in a spectacular way. Not for long.

    That’s probably why I’m so hyper and horny right now!
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    A major Republican donor is urging Trump to put sanctions on the UK for our gang rape human rights failings

    (Telegraph again)

    “The outspoken hedge fund manager questioned why the scandal had been able to continue while those who raised alarms about it were accused of “stirring up racial unrest”.

    Accusing Sir Keir and King Charles of “doing nothing to stop this madness”, Mr Ackman added: “Where is the international uproar? What are the UK and international rape victim groups doing to stop these horrendous acts?

    “Why wouldn’t Donald Trump consider appropriate sanctions against the UK until these concerns are addressed?””

    This is quite astonishing but with a small element of high comedy
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,062
    edited January 3

    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    FWIW, I believe Leon. I don't believe his friend's prediction because - as I noted below - Labour doesn't remove its leaders (not least because it doesn't really have the mechanism to do so).
    Think about it. A Labour INSIDER has parroted in the exact same terms what Leon has been repeating ad nauseam since Labour came to power.

    The only added extra is that its now been confirmed by a Labour Insider!Like he would even know a LABOUR INSIDER
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114

    Wes Streeting urges households to turn their heating on this weekend

    If true to form this could be the weekend the media concentrate on shivering pensioners !!!!

    Well, yes.

    I mean, you usually turn the heating on when it's cold.

    Unless it's an Australian heating system and comes on in their winter, like my old school seemed to have.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    Silly boy.

    The ideological project which is in trouble is your beloved Brexit.
    What is the ideology behind Brexit?
    Neo-poujadism.
    That just doesn't fit with most of the rhetoric about "Global Britain" etc. You could perhaps call Reform UK a poujadist party but the idea of not being in the EU doesn't have any intrinsic ideological component.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,688

    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!

    So Labour still in first place, then?

    The ghost of Lady Thatcher is telling them that they're not trying hard enough to be unpopular.

    Meanwhile, and on thread, who on the centre-right or right is going to call out this madness?
    Which madness ?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,966
    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    There is no mechanism to remove a Labour leader who doesn’t want to go. See Corbyn.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    It's bollocks. Labour doesn't remove anyone. Ever. They do talk about it a lot though.

    Well, they did remove MacDonald but that was only after he'd literally walked out on them and set up government with the Tories.
    Yes, that occurred to me. However my friend made one good point to back up his thesis. No one likes Starmer, even inside Labour. Corbyn had fans. Blair had disciples. Brown had a coterie

    Starmer is quite the loner and has no ideological group around him, he’s also got zero rizz and no charm

    Maybe he will be the exception that proves the rule, but I don’t put chances of his going higher than 15%. Unless there’s a scandal
    I tend to agree with that.

    However, I'll roll out again my five-point model for when leaders are replaced. Each* point of these has to be fulfilled before a party dumps its leader.

    1. A general sense within the party that things are so bad that a change of leader may be or is necessary;
    2. A crisis to spark MPs or cabinet ministers into action;
    3. A viable mechanism by which the replacement can occur;
    4. At least one potential successor who MPs can be confident would likely make the situation better;
    5. No potential successors with a reasonable chance of winning who would likely make things worse.

    These aren't binary conditions: there are areas of grey between 'this applies' and 'no it doesn't' but at the moment I don't think we can tick any of those boxes with confidence.

    * In a really serious crisis, point 5 might not apply - the party might roll the dice with disaster looming even if there's a good chance that doing so could produce an even bigger one - but at the very least, such a scenario would add a good deal of caution into thinking.
    Yes we discussed the lack of an obviously superior successor. If Andy Burnham became an MP maybe that would do it? But we were barrel scraping
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,700

    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!

    So Labour still in first place, then?

    The ghost of Lady Thatcher is telling them that they're not trying hard enough to be unpopular.

    Meanwhile, and on thread, who on the centre-right or right is going to call out this madness?
    Which madness ?
    Trumps Fascist Playbook, and its fellow travellers on PB and in UK.

    Are you really incapable of seeing what the rest of us are seeing?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,688
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    Silly boy.

    The ideological project which is in trouble is your beloved Brexit.
    What is the ideology behind Brexit?
    Neo-poujadism.
    What exactly is wrong with putting your own voters first ?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,966
    ydoethur said:

    Wes Streeting urges households to turn their heating on this weekend

    If true to form this could be the weekend the media concentrate on shivering pensioners !!!!

    Well, yes.

    I mean, you usually turn the heating on when it's cold.

    Unless it's an Australian heating system and comes on in their winter, like my old school seemed to have.
    How many people still have a hearing system that you turn on?

    As opposed to setting the thermostat to 20 and forgetting about it.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    FWIW, I believe Leon. I don't believe his friend's prediction because - as I noted below - Labour doesn't remove its leaders (not least because it doesn't really have the mechanism to do so).
    Think about it. A Labour INSIDER has parroted in the exact same terms what Leon has been repeating ad nauseam since Labour came to power.

    The only added extra is that its now been confirmed by a Labour Insider!Like he would even know a LABOUR INSIDER

    Are we talking an MP or a Cabinet Minister?18 MONTHS!! It's laughable
    Dearest Roger I live on the Primrose Hill borders and I work in artistic bohemian haute bourgeois circles. I can’t fucking move for Labour insiders - half my social circle at least is firmly on the left

    If anything, I need some more right wing friends
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    Rory Stewart calls Elon Musk a “genuine fascist”.

    https://x.com/ben_kew/status/1875193771572506860
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    It's bollocks. Labour doesn't remove anyone. Ever. They do talk about it a lot though.

    Well, they did remove MacDonald but that was only after he'd literally walked out on them and set up government with the Tories.
    They removed Lansbury in 1935, but that was as much as anything else because he'd fallen out with the unions.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,114

    Rory Stewart calls Elon Musk a “genuine fascist”.

    https://x.com/ben_kew/status/1875193771572506860

    Ridiculous comment.

    The man's a complete fake.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145

    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!

    So Labour still in first place, then?

    The ghost of Lady Thatcher is telling them that they're not trying hard enough to be unpopular.

    Meanwhile, and on thread, who on the centre-right or right is going to call out this madness?
    Wait, what, is that a national VI poll??
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 29,203

    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Kemi jumps on the bandwagon:

    https://x.com/kemibadenoch/status/1874749990842814606

    The time is long overdue for a full national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal.

    Trials have taken place all over the country in recent years but no one in authority has joined the dots.

    2025 must be the year that the victims start to get justice.

    Oh FFS!

    Here is the IICSA website - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/index.html.

    Could someone in her party send her the link? Or tell her about the Drew Review and Operation Stovewood by the NCA. Or the Jay report or what Dame Louise Casey has done?

    Or remind her of what her fellow Cabinet Minister, Suellla Braverman, the Home Secretary to do in May 2023 when the final IICSA Report came out?

    This is bandwagon jumping of the most tawdry kind instead of action - which she could have been asking for when she was an actual Cabinet Minister.
    What magnificent results have these reports and enquiries produced?
    The IICSA Report - nothing because the government - disgracefully - refused to take action on its recommendations. See https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/05/24/kicking-issues-into-the-long-grass/

    The Drew Review was used to improve the approach of South Yorkshire Police.

    Operation Stovewood: run by the NCA is the largest criminal enforcement investigation into non-family CSE. It has identified 1100 victims, has 50 investigations outstanding and has led to 36 convictions.

    The Jay Report was used to improve services within Rotherham Council which was put into special measures. The council leader and head of children's services left.

    It is something. By no means enough, of course.

    But what actual use will yet another inquiry costing millions, reporting in a decade or so and telling us stuff we already know be? Because my suspicion is that this is not really about joining dots or understanding the manifold causes of male sexual violence - let alone taking effective action against it - but political point-scoring and a disguised fight about immigration, in which the needs of the victims - girls mostly - will largely be ignored.
    Kemi is absolutely right to demand a full public enquiry. We quite rightly had one when postmasters' lives and livelihoods were ruined by public servants whose actions bordered on criminal. The victims of the grooming gangs deserve just as much justice, and the enablers of this abuse must be made to answer for their behaviour, and the causes brought into the open and eliminated from the public sphere.

    This initiative is aligned to Kemi's long-held public stances on culture, and the stress she places on public bodies that don't work. It isn't just necessary, it feels authentic to her and what she stands for.
    🙂‍↔️ you are clueless.

    Kemi is in an official office, but the front page of today’s Daily Telegraph and Musk on X decides strategy and positions for her?

    Then Kemi MUST lead at PMQs asking: how many beloved pets have been stolen and eaten by these outsiders to our country, for sure that hell is warmer than North Yorkshire today Bobby J will ask exactly this, at any moment.

    This politics is developing just as awful for the Conservatives and their leader as could possibly have feared - ‘voting blocks’ on the marmite questions at the next General Election that favours Labour and Libdems mopping up seats from small % of votes from shrinking turnouts.

    All Kemi’s questions at the next PMQs, at ALL PMQs this year, must flag to voters how an incoming government inherited a growing economy, that will now have absolutely no growth for the whole of 2025! leading to higher taxes and more borrowing to fill the expanding black hole.

    Kemi should look to today’s FT front page, not the DT.
    I think comparing the very real nightmare of gang-raped girls to rumours about Haitans eating pets is a bit rich for my blood to be honest, whether that was your intention or not.
    There’s a goat gone missing around here, a much beloved family pet. Are you not thinking what we are all thinking about what’s happened to it? 🐐

    It’s “that lot” over there - outsiders surging into our community, responsible for ALL the bad things, from no decent housing or dentists, to grooming gangs, and pets eaten.

    If we tolerate this, our own families will be next.

    Plus the fact Starmer was head of the criminal justice system, so any enquiry is really all about asking him why he failed us.

    The intention is pointing out to everyone, you are a fellow traveller with fascism.
    You don't deserve a response, but I shall give one just in case anyone gives a second thought to your thick-witted allegations.

    I have said, until I'm blue in the face, in the last thread, and others, going back years, that I take a behaviourist view of the events in Rotherham and elsewhere, that there may have been cultural antecedents, but the ballooning scale of the events was itself due to the de facto immunity from punishment afforded by the authorities, which allowed groups of men to indulge their worst fantasies in a consequence-free environment. I blame the (primarily white) authorities for this cruel dereliction of duty, and that is what we need a public enquiry to establish and root out. We cannot stop crime at source but we can punish it and deprive those responsible of their freedom, in order to deter others as much as anything else.

    What happened to those girls is not any kind of laughing matter, and your posts on this have for me crossed from your usual harmless buffoonery to grotesque, callous insensitivity. So well done on that. 🐐
  • FossFoss Posts: 1,093

    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!

    There are some more details here: https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/reform-threat-starmer-mega-poll-3458746
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,637
    Some of you may have heard of Thomas Midgley Jr. He was an American industrial chemist who developed both lead additives for petrol and CFCs for refrigeration. Both of which did what they were intended to do very well. Shame about the side effects.

    Anyway, he later contracted polio and went on to invent a mobility device that helped him get in and out of bed. Which also worked very well, until the day the machine swallowed him up and killed him by strangulation.

    I mention this because something similar seems to be happening to Musk. Twitter always had to be used carefully as a news source, but the quest for engagement has turned it into a machine for generating outrage. That machine now appears to be devouring its owner and (sort of) creator, and sending him and others mad.

    It's almost poignant.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,766

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    As posted ad nauseam, I expect Starmer to resign like Harold Wilson.
    What, you mean after his fourth general election victory ?
    Good spot. No, immediately before revealing a sinister South African plot to undermine him!
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 8,629

    Another GE is not going to happen before 2029, but what we are witnessing is disunity and bitterness growing at a fearful rate with unknown consequences

    Social media is virtually out of control with Musk pouring petrol on the flames

    We can jump.up and down and shout to the heavens, but what we really need is good governance and I do not see where that is coming from

    Very difficult times ahead

    Social media needs to be regulated. It should be a public utility with fixed returns on capital. There should be no economic incentive to run toxic algorithms
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 43,171

    kinabalu said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
    No, as we've seen over the last 14 years, the Tories are part of the problem and are just as much in thrawl to the same ideology. Putting the Tories back in charge wouldn't help at all.
    It's easier to critique capitalism than design a realistic alternative tbf.
    Is this a feature of capitalism?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/10/birmingham-city-council-agrees-deal-over-equal-pay-claims

    Birmingham city council has reached an agreement to settle historical equal pay claims that left the authority with liabilities estimated at £760m and pushed it into effective bankruptcy.
    I thought you were talking about the ideology on which the UK is based. There are several but I'd say it's capitalism if you have to pick just one.

    What are you saying it is? What ideology has a bigger impact on life in Britain than capitalism?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,688

    Seems a Stonehaven poll is out with

    Labour 23%
    Conservative 20%
    Reform 17%

    It is paywalled in the I newspaper

    NOA looks popular !!!

    So Labour still in first place, then?

    The ghost of Lady Thatcher is telling them that they're not trying hard enough to be unpopular.

    Meanwhile, and on thread, who on the centre-right or right is going to call out this madness?
    Which madness ?
    Trumps Fascist Playbook, and its fellow travellers on PB and in UK.

    Are you really incapable of seeing what the rest of us are seeing?
    I see the ususal hysterical bollocks of people creating bogeymen without being able to look at their own actions.

    Youre simply annoyed that the Blair settlement is crumbling. Stupidly Mandelson said these people have nowhere else to go. Well now they have and instead of trying to win votes back its blame the voters..

    Bertolt Brecht called it right.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 57,145

    Musk is looking deranged on X. But I think the mood on there captures *something* that has changed and won’t be going away - and I’ve no idea where it leads

    What I do know is that people evidently voted for change / something different, and what it appears is happening with Labour in government is barely any different. The system we have in this country just isn’t fit for purpose.

    There is a definite and dramatic vibe shift. The Temple of Woke is collapsing. In America. There are multiple signs everywhere now

    What starts there will v likely come here
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,766
    edited January 3

    ydoethur said:

    Wes Streeting urges households to turn their heating on this weekend

    If true to form this could be the weekend the media concentrate on shivering pensioners !!!!

    Well, yes.

    I mean, you usually turn the heating on when it's cold.

    Unless it's an Australian heating system and comes on in their winter, like my old school seemed to have.
    How many people still have a hearing system that you turn on?

    As opposed to setting the thermostat to 20 and forgetting about it.
    Lots of people use the thermostat as an on/off switch. Whack it up to turn on; down to turn off. Even I do that on a fan heater sometimes.

    ETA others will have central heating (or storage heaters) timed for when the cheaper tariff is in operation.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,688
    Leon said:

    Musk is looking deranged on X. But I think the mood on there captures *something* that has changed and won’t be going away - and I’ve no idea where it leads

    What I do know is that people evidently voted for change / something different, and what it appears is happening with Labour in government is barely any different. The system we have in this country just isn’t fit for purpose.

    There is a definite and dramatic vibe shift. The Temple of Woke is collapsing. In America. There are multiple signs everywhere now

    What starts there will v likely come here
    Dont frighten the children, they may have to think for themselves.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,713
    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
    No, as we've seen over the last 14 years, the Tories are part of the problem and are just as much in thrawl to the same ideology. Putting the Tories back in charge wouldn't help at all.
    It's easier to critique capitalism than design a realistic alternative tbf.
    Is this a feature of capitalism?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/10/birmingham-city-council-agrees-deal-over-equal-pay-claims

    Birmingham city council has reached an agreement to settle historical equal pay claims that left the authority with liabilities estimated at £760m and pushed it into effective bankruptcy.
    I thought you were talking about the ideology on which the UK is based. There are several but I'd say it's capitalism if you have to pick just one.

    What are you saying it is? What ideology has a bigger impact on life in Britain than capitalism?
    Socialism is as powerful as capitalism, so we get social democracy, as the compromise between the two.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,773

    Some of you may have heard of Thomas Midgley Jr. He was an American industrial chemist who developed both lead additives for petrol and CFCs for refrigeration. Both of which did what they were intended to do very well. Shame about the side effects.

    Anyway, he later contracted polio and went on to invent a mobility device that helped him get in and out of bed. Which also worked very well, until the day the machine swallowed him up and killed him by strangulation.

    I mention this because something similar seems to be happening to Musk. Twitter always had to be used carefully as a news source, but the quest for engagement has turned it into a machine for generating outrage. That machine now appears to be devouring its owner and (sort of) creator, and sending him and others mad.

    It's almost poignant.

    It's like a more up-to-date version of the mediocre Brosnan bond film where some Murdoch-like media mogul is stirring up war between Britain and China for...reasons.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,713
    Leon said:

    Musk is looking deranged on X. But I think the mood on there captures *something* that has changed and won’t be going away - and I’ve no idea where it leads

    What I do know is that people evidently voted for change / something different, and what it appears is happening with Labour in government is barely any different. The system we have in this country just isn’t fit for purpose.

    There is a definite and dramatic vibe shift. The Temple of Woke is collapsing. In America. There are multiple signs everywhere now

    What starts there will v likely come here
    To paraphrase Harold MacMillan, there is certainly a Wind of Change.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,427
    edited January 3
    Of course the King won't dissolve Parliament just a few months after the election and with Labour having such a strong and stable majority.

    That said, the attacks from Musk are just another element in the narrative that Labour is turning out to be a very, very unpopular government and upsetting people on all sides of the political divide.

    WFA will be the next thing to come back and bite them with this freezing cold weather set to last for a good week or more...
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,810
    kinabalu said:

    kinabalu said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Labour are in trouble because the ideological project of the modern UK is in trouble. The question is becoming whether it can be reformed or whether it will end in some kind of collapse or revolution.
    You say that "Labour are in trouble" in relation to "will it end in some kind of collapse or revolution". Is the solution for Chaz to overthrow Labour so that we can put the Tories in?

    If only we had the Tories in government, the "modern UK" would not be "in trouble". It was a paradise until July, and Labour broke it.

    Boooooo I say, Booooooo. The only way to save our democracy, our modern UK is to overthrow democracy. People Voted the Wrong Way and we must Vote Again. Just as we didn't after Brexit where the exact same people suggested it would be outrageous to overthrow democracy and vote again.
    No, as we've seen over the last 14 years, the Tories are part of the problem and are just as much in thrawl to the same ideology. Putting the Tories back in charge wouldn't help at all.
    It's easier to critique capitalism than design a realistic alternative tbf.
    Is this a feature of capitalism?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/10/birmingham-city-council-agrees-deal-over-equal-pay-claims

    Birmingham city council has reached an agreement to settle historical equal pay claims that left the authority with liabilities estimated at £760m and pushed it into effective bankruptcy.
    I thought you were talking about the ideology on which the UK is based. There are several but I'd say it's capitalism if you have to pick just one.

    What are you saying it is? What ideology has a bigger impact on life in Britain than capitalism?
    I'm not sure what the best name for it is but maybe legalism. The idea that the path towards progress comes from encoding ever more 'rights'.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,980
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Leon said:

    spudgfsh said:

    There will be of course be no election until 2028/29 . However the mere fact this is being taken semi seriously shows how bad labour have started . A bit of class war has backfired especially regarding farmers and the banal promise of "growth" has especially backfired given the abysmal budget that everyone can see is anti-growth

    It's not being taken even semi-seriously by anyone with a brain.

    - Calling for another election is fine, as far as I am concerned.
    - Getting the House of Commons to debate having another election via enough petition votes is fine.
    - The majority of the House voting for a dissolution and another election, this evening. Fine

    The last isn't going to happen. Short of Starmer announcing that Trump is the Saviour Of The World - that *might* swing enough Labour MPs against him.
    even if SKS is forced to resign as PM, Labour have enough seats to switch to someone else. I can't see it happening.
    I had drinks with a labour insider last night. He surprised me by saying that Starmer is already in Trouble, and that if his dire polling does not improve in 18 months labour will remove him

    Could be bollocks. My friend is loyal Labour. Centrist
    Why come on here with a completely invented story knowing that no one on here believes a word you say?
    FWIW, I believe Leon. I don't believe his friend's prediction because - as I noted below - Labour doesn't remove its leaders (not least because it doesn't really have the mechanism to do so).
    Think about it. A Labour INSIDER has parroted in the exact same terms what Leon has been repeating ad nauseam since Labour came to power.

    The only added extra is that its now been confirmed by a Labour Insider!Like he would even know a LABOUR INSIDER
    Hmm. Do I think someone who lives and works in the London media industry knows a Labour member? I guess it's possible.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,713

    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Kemi jumps on the bandwagon:

    https://x.com/kemibadenoch/status/1874749990842814606

    The time is long overdue for a full national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal.

    Trials have taken place all over the country in recent years but no one in authority has joined the dots.

    2025 must be the year that the victims start to get justice.

    Oh FFS!

    Here is the IICSA website - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/index.html.

    Could someone in her party send her the link? Or tell her about the Drew Review and Operation Stovewood by the NCA. Or the Jay report or what Dame Louise Casey has done?

    Or remind her of what her fellow Cabinet Minister, Suellla Braverman, the Home Secretary to do in May 2023 when the final IICSA Report came out?

    This is bandwagon jumping of the most tawdry kind instead of action - which she could have been asking for when she was an actual Cabinet Minister.
    What magnificent results have these reports and enquiries produced?
    The IICSA Report - nothing because the government - disgracefully - refused to take action on its recommendations. See https://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/05/24/kicking-issues-into-the-long-grass/

    The Drew Review was used to improve the approach of South Yorkshire Police.

    Operation Stovewood: run by the NCA is the largest criminal enforcement investigation into non-family CSE. It has identified 1100 victims, has 50 investigations outstanding and has led to 36 convictions.

    The Jay Report was used to improve services within Rotherham Council which was put into special measures. The council leader and head of children's services left.

    It is something. By no means enough, of course.

    But what actual use will yet another inquiry costing millions, reporting in a decade or so and telling us stuff we already know be? Because my suspicion is that this is not really about joining dots or understanding the manifold causes of male sexual violence - let alone taking effective action against it - but political point-scoring and a disguised fight about immigration, in which the needs of the victims - girls mostly - will largely be ignored.
    Kemi is absolutely right to demand a full public enquiry. We quite rightly had one when postmasters' lives and livelihoods were ruined by public servants whose actions bordered on criminal. The victims of the grooming gangs deserve just as much justice, and the enablers of this abuse must be made to answer for their behaviour, and the causes brought into the open and eliminated from the public sphere.

    This initiative is aligned to Kemi's long-held public stances on culture, and the stress she places on public bodies that don't work. It isn't just necessary, it feels authentic to her and what she stands for.
    🙂‍↔️ you are clueless.

    Kemi is in an official office, but the front page of today’s Daily Telegraph and Musk on X decides strategy and positions for her?

    Then Kemi MUST lead at PMQs asking: how many beloved pets have been stolen and eaten by these outsiders to our country, for sure that hell is warmer than North Yorkshire today Bobby J will ask exactly this, at any moment.

    This politics is developing just as awful for the Conservatives and their leader as could possibly have feared - ‘voting blocks’ on the marmite questions at the next General Election that favours Labour and Libdems mopping up seats from small % of votes from shrinking turnouts.

    All Kemi’s questions at the next PMQs, at ALL PMQs this year, must flag to voters how an incoming government inherited a growing economy, that will now have absolutely no growth for the whole of 2025! leading to higher taxes and more borrowing to fill the expanding black hole.

    Kemi should look to today’s FT front page, not the DT.
    I think comparing the very real nightmare of gang-raped girls to rumours about Haitans eating pets is a bit rich for my blood to be honest, whether that was your intention or not.
    There’s a goat gone missing around here, a much beloved family pet. Are you not thinking what we are all thinking about what’s happened to it? 🐐

    It’s “that lot” over there - outsiders surging into our community, responsible for ALL the bad things, from no decent housing or dentists, to grooming gangs, and pets eaten.

    If we tolerate this, our own families will be next.

    Plus the fact Starmer was head of the criminal justice system, so any enquiry is really all about asking him why he failed us.

    The intention is pointing out to everyone, you are a fellow traveller with fascism.
    You don't deserve a response, but I shall give one just in case anyone gives a second thought to your thick-witted allegations.

    I have said, until I'm blue in the face, in the last thread, and others, going back years, that I take a behaviourist view of the events in Rotherham and elsewhere, that there may have been cultural antecedents, but the ballooning scale of the events was itself due to the de facto immunity from punishment afforded by the authorities, which allowed groups of men to indulge their worst fantasies in a consequence-free environment. I blame the (primarily white) authorities for this cruel dereliction of duty, and that is what we need a public enquiry to establish and root out. We cannot stop crime at source but we can punish it and deprive those responsible of their freedom, in order to deter others as much as anything else.

    What happened to those girls is not any kind of laughing matter, and your posts on this have for me crossed from your usual harmless buffoonery to grotesque, callous insensitivity. So well done on that. 🐐
    You are correct that the worst part of it is the willingness of people in authority to treat rape as less important than their ideology.

    As Terry Pratchett puts it:

    “Treating people as things, that’s what sin is …that’s where it begins.”
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,362
    edited January 3

    ydoethur said:

    Wes Streeting urges households to turn their heating on this weekend

    If true to form this could be the weekend the media concentrate on shivering pensioners !!!!

    Well, yes.

    I mean, you usually turn the heating on when it's cold.

    Unless it's an Australian heating system and comes on in their winter, like my old school seemed to have.
    How many people still have a hearing system that you turn on?

    As opposed to setting the thermostat to 20 and forgetting about it.
    20? Put a jumper on man!

    Mrs Biggles would like you. I go for 17 and she raises it to 20. It oscillates through the day.

    Mind you we do also have a coal fire as an affectation.
Sign In or Register to comment.