Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

For Boris Johnson fans, in short BJ sucks – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited July 4 in General
For Boris Johnson fans, in short BJ sucks – politicalbetting.com

Indeed, almost all of the precipitous decline in the British public’s opinion of the Conservative party came under Johnson.To believe everything was salvageable until Truss came in is to completely ignore what the evidence actually shows. pic.twitter.com/UDIO7TGGv7

Read the full story here

«13456789

Comments

  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,997
    First Tory seat?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    Boris still has fans ?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,873
    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    The great unknown is would Boris have ended up in the situation that Rishi is currently in?

    And equally if Rishi had directly replaced Boris would the situation be much different?

    Now we will never 100% know but I suspect that even without Liz Truss in the middle the current Tory party situation would have been little different even if history was slightly different.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,449
    Nigelb said:

    Boris still has fans ?

    There's this chap called Alex de Pfeffel...
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    Also, laying Boris isn't much of a tip when he's 50/1 and longer.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    edited July 1
    Nigelb said:

    Boris still has fans ?

    Nadine Dorries by the looks of it...
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,449
    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    That comparison only works if things wouldn't have continued getting worse had BoJo stayed on, which seems optimistic.

    Same for Truss.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,669
    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    Yes. The header doesn't suggest that the decline didn't continue thereafter!
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    Nigelb said:

    Also, laying Boris isn't much of a tip when he's 50/1 and longer.

    I know but some of us remember the Santorum surge and when Mike advised laying the mahoosive favourite in one primary.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    It'll 'limited to the present circumstances, only' which means Trump gets immunity and every other President doesn't.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    That is the nightmare scenario. Although I don't know if it's as bad as the Chevron case from last week.
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 976
    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    Probably say Trump is immune but for his particular crimes only.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532
    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,683
    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532
    Not quite seeing the point of Dinard

    Yes it’s pleasant. But I can get all this in England with better food and England is more interesting
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    My election spreadsheet is currently totting up the number of parties running in the GE. It's up to 113, most annoying party so far is the Scottish Family party which is going to make parsing the SNP's results either slightly inaccurate or a pain the arse.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,162
    Three* days left. Time to pump some gas into the giant inflatable Bozo to remind voters what the Conservatives stand for.

    The Tories over-estimated Hartlepool, and they over-estimated him.

    Those who called that by-election win peak Bozo had it bang-on.

    *Or two. Or four.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,334

    Three* days left. Time to pump some gas into the giant inflatable Bozo to remind voters what the Conservatives stand for.

    The Tories over-estimated Hartlepool, and they over-estimated him.

    Those who called that by-election win peak Bozo had it bang-on.

    *Or two. Or four.

    Monkey business, it was.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    In the French elections, I saw that the NFP have said in run offs that they can't win they'd drop out to help defeat RN; last I saw the ENS hadn't said either way if they were going to do the same. Has there been any update on this that anyone here has noticed?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,683
    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    40/1

    Is that value?
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    The great unknown is would Boris have ended up in the situation that Rishi is currently in?

    And equally if Rishi had directly replaced Boris would the situation be much different?

    Now we will never 100% know but I suspect that even without Liz Truss in the middle the current Tory party situation would have been little different even if history was slightly different.
    As a girl on the Centre-Left there’s only one Conservative I’d have feared in this election and that is Boris Johnson.

    Mainly because he’s a disgusting liar, contemptible, turd … but people seem to believe him
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,099
    @RedfieldWilton

    Joint-largest lead EVER for Keir Starmer on this question (Tied with 18 February).

    Between Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak, who do British voters believe can build a strong economy? (21-24 June)

    Keir Starmer 44% (+1)
    Rishi Sunak 29% (–)

    Changes +/- 14-17 June

    https://x.com/RedfieldWilton/status/1807748573766778974
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    I mean, obviously the following is a joke and the Dems wouldn't do it: but if the ruling does accept the Trump teams legal theory then Biden could do the funniest thing and have Trump whacked. The Trump team did argue it would be legal for the President to assassinate a political rival or to do a coup, so they can't complain if Biden then does it...

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/25/trump-attorney-john-sauer-doubles-down-on-argument-that-presidents-are-immune-from-assassinating-political-rivals-at-supreme-court/
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,556
    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    The great unknown is would Boris have ended up in the situation that Rishi is currently in?

    And equally if Rishi had directly replaced Boris would the situation be much different?

    Now we will never 100% know but I suspect that even without Liz Truss in the middle the current Tory party situation would have been little different even if history was slightly different.
    I think if Sunak had replaced Boris without the Truss interregnum then it’s a good chance the cost of living crisis would not have been as bad as it was as the market shocks would have been gentler. There would also be less of a stench of incompetence around the party in terms of the public seeing a bit of crazy in action.

    I also think that if Sunak had replaced Boris directly and the markets hadn’t blown up Sunak would have been in a much stronger position to deal with the wings of the party rather than fighting a giant economic crisis being the only real consideration. It’s possible he could have been able to keep Suella and co at a safe distance if everything hadn’t been such chaos.

    These are just my own hypotheticals from a position of bias in that I believe that Sunak, whilst far from a good politician, is a small tax, small gov person (and would have been good for the country long term)but also realised this couldn’t be so in some short term circumstances but if he had been given a less bonkers starting position then he likely wouldn’t have been under so much political pressure and therefore maybe not made so many political gaffes.

    Other opinions are available.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,214
    edited July 1

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    https://x.com/whotargetsme/status/1807720494126227474?s=46

    Priti Patel (Witham, majority 25,669, 353rd safest Tory seat), has started running Facebook ads in the last couple of days. Very unlikely the seat will change hands.

    19th safest Tory seat.
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    They're very strongly represented in the leafy S.W. London suburbs and throughout the West Country ... yes, I kinda know what you mean!
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,683
    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    edited July 1
    3000 candidates and still updating, 123 seperate party names so far

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hTatDgSpL1zGu9FUKqHw4x5kbkkqHuE2VINI3Ig75CE/edit?usp=sharing

    Democracy club 3 is the currently updating sheet.

    3110 now ^^; Will copy the values to a new sheet once it's all uploaded..
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,214
    boulay said:

    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    The great unknown is would Boris have ended up in the situation that Rishi is currently in?

    And equally if Rishi had directly replaced Boris would the situation be much different?

    Now we will never 100% know but I suspect that even without Liz Truss in the middle the current Tory party situation would have been little different even if history was slightly different.
    I think if Sunak had replaced Boris without the Truss interregnum then it’s a good chance the cost of living crisis would not have been as bad as it was as the market shocks would have been gentler. There would also be less of a stench of incompetence around the party in terms of the public seeing a bit of crazy in action.

    I also think that if Sunak had replaced Boris directly and the markets hadn’t blown up Sunak would have been in a much stronger position to deal with the wings of the party rather than fighting a giant economic crisis being the only real consideration. It’s possible he could have been able to keep Suella and co at a safe distance if everything hadn’t been such chaos.

    These are just my own hypotheticals from a position of bias in that I believe that Sunak, whilst far from a good politician, is a small tax, small gov person (and would have been good for the country long term)but also realised this couldn’t be so in some short term circumstances but if he had been given a less bonkers starting position then he likely wouldn’t have been under so much political pressure and therefore maybe not made so many political gaffes.

    Other opinions are available.
    If Sunak had replaced Boris directly I reckon the Trussite wing would have successfully mounted a leadership challenge early this year. It was only the ludicrous idea of yet another PM that held this back in 2024.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,683

    https://x.com/whotargetsme/status/1807720494126227474?s=46

    Priti Patel (Witham, majority 25,669, 353rd safest Tory seat), has started running Facebook ads in the last couple of days. Very unlikely the seat will change hands.

    19th safest Tory seat.

    I've had Facebook ads from both the Lib Dems and Reform, but nothing from the Conservatives.

    Facebook almost definitely know my profile and everything about me, so they are targeting core Conservative voters and have the money to do it too. Even Reform.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,214

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,890
    OK.

    Had a little nibble with one of my 10 £4 fun money pots on Middlesbrough South & East Cleveland.

    Now we'll see.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,721

    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    It'll 'limited to the present circumstances, only' which means Trump gets immunity and every other President doesn't.
    But - if Biden orders Trump, Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh shot in DC;

    Then resigns;

    And Harris pardons everyone involved;

    The corpses of all four should be cool with that.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,142
    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    The great unknown is would Boris have ended up in the situation that Rishi is currently in?

    And equally if Rishi had directly replaced Boris would the situation be much different?

    Now we will never 100% know but I suspect that even without Liz Truss in the middle the current Tory party situation would have been little different even if history was slightly different.
    Boris and Sunak are pretty much equal and opposite, electorally.

    Boris had supporters (95% of the Tory rump) in spite of his weaknesses, and because of his strengths (a good % of previous Labour voters)

    Sunak loses more traditional Tories (like me) because the technocratic state keeps growing, and more swing voters because he is perceived as being 'too right wing' by many waverers.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,683
    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
    Thanks. You're near Ground Zero of Lib Demmery there, though.

    It's SW London and it probably bleeds out like pebbles in a millpond once people realise you're the main challenger.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084

    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    40/1

    Is that value?
    Worth a flutter I reckon
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,449
    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
    No offence to you at all, but I didn’t find your canvassing report convincing.

    And nor do electoral calculus support it. But if I’m wrong I’m wrong.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,099
    edited July 1
    If the Supreme Court rules this afternoon that Trump is NOT immune (yeah, I know, but go with it) does that give Biden the cover to withdraw?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    Greetings from France

    So far the place hasnt burnt down that will probably be on Sunday

    76 seats have already been filled where the candidate got over 50% of the vote

    RN 39
    Left Alliance 30
    Macronites 1
    Others 6
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,683
    Mortimer said:

    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    Sunak would be delighted if he got 211 seats on Thursday though as Boris was projected to get when he was ousted

    The great unknown is would Boris have ended up in the situation that Rishi is currently in?

    And equally if Rishi had directly replaced Boris would the situation be much different?

    Now we will never 100% know but I suspect that even without Liz Truss in the middle the current Tory party situation would have been little different even if history was slightly different.
    Boris and Sunak are pretty much equal and opposite, electorally.

    Boris had supporters (95% of the Tory rump) in spite of his weaknesses, and because of his strengths (a good % of previous Labour voters)

    Sunak loses more traditional Tories (like me) because the technocratic state keeps growing, and more swing voters because he is perceived as being 'too right wing' by many waverers.
    The trouble is he loses core Conservatives for being too left-wing and floaters for being too right-wing.

    He's in a real pickle.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    They're very strongly represented in the leafy S.W. London suburbs and throughout the West Country ... yes, I kinda know what you mean!
    Superficially the profile of the Lib Dem voter is very similar to that of a Green Party voter (or that might be changing this election); typically white and middle class from an area where Labour has never been the "natural" party to beat the Conservatives. The parties diverge mostly in their radicalism; both have systemic criticisms of the British political system (arguing in favour of PR, being more in favour of small d democratic reform) and have somewhat overlapping policy positions on largely popular issues (drug legalisation, environmental policies, more welfare spending). The LDs have a history of being more free marketers and friendly to capitalist interests, whereas the Green Party is an ecosocialist party.

    I think if the Greens can breakthrough and get 3-4 MPs at this election and come second in multiple other seats, we'll see them being as popular as the LDs quite quickly; I know that hypothetical polling isn't always worth the words used to conduct them, but those I've seen asking how people would vote if they had PR / didn't feel the need to vote tactically had the Greens polling above the LDs.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    ydoethur said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    It'll 'limited to the present circumstances, only' which means Trump gets immunity and every other President doesn't.
    But - if Biden orders Trump, Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh shot in DC;

    Then resigns;

    And Harris pardons everyone involved;

    The corpses of all four should be cool with that.
    I mean why stop at Kavanaugh... go for a full bench of 9 Dems at that point.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,556
    Leon said:

    Not quite seeing the point of Dinard

    Yes it’s pleasant. But I can get all this in England with better food and England is more interesting

    It’s definitely more a summer weekends and high summer place. It’s then full of pretty people dressed well but a nice casual beachside feel. Full bars and those great cheesy French nightclubs that you fall out of as it’s getting light.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,721
    Farooq said:

    Scott_xP said:

    If the Supreme Court rules that afternoon that Trump is NOT immune (yeah, I know, but go with it) does that give Biden the cover to withdraw?

    I think I'm missing your leap of logic here. Cover in the sense that the news cycle will be focused on this? No, Biden withdrawing would overwhelm all other news.
    The logic being I suppose that if he's not immune, he'll stand trial and conceivably be locked up while President so would lose to a monkey on a stick.

    The snag is, not only has that already happened but Biden would see it as a reason to keep going himself.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    edited July 1
    ydoethur said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    It'll 'limited to the present circumstances, only' which means Trump gets immunity and every other President doesn't.
    But - if Biden orders Trump, Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh shot in DC;

    Then resigns;

    And Harris pardons everyone involved;

    The corpses of all four should be cool with that.
    Surely you would get rid of all 5/6 Judges that voted the "wrong" way - best to ensure the Supreme court is completely fixed.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,721
    eek said:

    ydoethur said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    It'll 'limited to the present circumstances, only' which means Trump gets immunity and every other President doesn't.
    But - if Biden orders Trump, Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh shot in DC;

    Then resigns;

    And Harris pardons everyone involved;

    The corpses of all four should be cool with that.
    Surely you would get rid of all 5/6 Judges that voted the "wrong" way - best to ensure the Supreme court is completely fixed.
    Roberts and Coney Barrett can stay. Token right wingers are useful.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,239
    Hmm double-entedres.

    The interesting takeaway from various vox-pops is that people's antagonism towards Johnson is he made promises he had no intention of meeting. Rather than because of Party gate.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,902
    148grss said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    I mean, obviously the following is a joke and the Dems wouldn't do it: but if the ruling does accept the Trump teams legal theory then Biden could do the funniest thing and have Trump whacked. The Trump team did argue it would be legal for the President to assassinate a political rival or to do a coup, so they can't complain if Biden then does it...

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/25/trump-attorney-john-sauer-doubles-down-on-argument-that-presidents-are-immune-from-assassinating-political-rivals-at-supreme-court/
    Their argument is that Trump won the 2020 election, so Biden isn't legitimately the President, and therefore Biden does not benefit from immunity.

    Expect this argument when they are dragging JR Biden through the courts after Trump returns to the White House.
  • highwayparadise306highwayparadise306 Posts: 1,274
    Heathener said:

    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
    No offence to you at all, but I didn’t find your canvassing report convincing.

    And nor do electoral calculus support it. But if I’m wrong I’m wrong.
    Is this seat going Lib Dem?
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    "Posh" and "Upper Middle Class" are highly subjective terms. Perhaps a more accurate definition would be a household with a 3 year old or newer electrically powered car.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,214
    Heathener said:

    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
    No offence to you at all, but I didn’t find your canvassing report convincing.

    And nor do electoral calculus support it. But if I’m wrong I’m wrong.
    I'm heartbroken that you should find my reporting unconvincing. Heartbroken.
  • 148grss148grss Posts: 4,155
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    My friend who does comms and PR stuff was working for a company during Brexit where he had to give a presentation about the potential labour market if we did leave the EU. Someone had crunched the numbers, and it was clear that migration from India, Africa and South East Asia would increase to fill our labour shortages that otherwise were filled by European migrants - with migrants from other majority English speaking nations (Canada, US, Australia etc.) likely decreasing because they could probably get a similar job on the continent and then be able to visit anywhere in the EU very easily and there isn't much of a language barrier anymore as everyone speaks English anyway. Apparently this did not go down well...
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532
    boulay said:

    Leon said:

    Not quite seeing the point of Dinard

    Yes it’s pleasant. But I can get all this in England with better food and England is more interesting

    It’s definitely more a summer weekends and high summer place. It’s then full of pretty people dressed well but a nice casual beachside feel. Full bars and those great cheesy French nightclubs that you fall out of as it’s getting light.
    It’s just a bit dull and too similar to Britain without the advantages of being Britain - salty seaside pubs and gnarly old history and everything so insanely crowded together it becomes fascinating in itself

    However you were quite right about Dinan - it’s gorgeous - so I remain grateful!

    Also I just made €5,000 selling a flint to design to Poland so I am still in love with the European mainland. Just not Dinard
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,099
    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    The Sovereign act of a Sovereign Parliament that Leon voted for...
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,214

    Heathener said:

    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
    No offence to you at all, but I didn’t find your canvassing report convincing.

    And nor do electoral calculus support it. But if I’m wrong I’m wrong.
    Is this seat going Lib Dem?
    Probably a Tory hold but we're not that far behind. It's been Lib Dem many times in the past but is now looking more "safe" Tory than a decade ago.
  • highwayparadise306highwayparadise306 Posts: 1,274
    Labour look assured to have a good majority in the house. Fantasy politics would be they fall short and do a coalition with the Lib dems. The best scenario would be Labour fall short and we have the conservatives with 280 seats. Lib Dems with 55. Tory Lib Dem coalition part 2. Clegg leaves Meta and comes back and takes up his old role.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,099
    @benrileysmith

    The leafy backdrop for stop two on Keir Starmer’s home counties tour. Thatched roof, church tower. A tractor just drove by. Traditional Tory country.

    https://x.com/benrileysmith/status/1807749045101674750
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Top of the list for candidate names from the excellent democracy club resource

    A one Captain Beany, standing in Aberafon Maestag !
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Scott_xP said:

    @benrileysmith

    The leafy backdrop for stop two on Keir Starmer’s home counties tour. Thatched roof, church tower. A tractor just drove by. Traditional Tory country.

    https://x.com/benrileysmith/status/1807749045101674750

    Where is he exactly ?

    Thatched roof reminds me more of a LD/Con battleground area tbh.
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    We were getting about 50:50 Lib Dem / not Lib Dem in canvassing yesterday in a definitely not posh, mixed area.

    Now I'm sure the real split is less good than that as people answering the door to visibly orange sticker-wearing canvassers are going to be self-selecting, but I didn't come across a single well to do upper middle class member.
    Where was this please?
    Sutton and Cheam. See my canvassing report yesterday.
    Slightly fewer leaves, than some of its neighbouring suburbs it has to be said, but I feel sure you see see what I mean!
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532
    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    I want their party dead
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,069
    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    The point being, since Brexit we can now vote out parties who fail to deal with immigration. Hurray!

    Unfortunately we can only do this by replacing them with a party which is even more pro-immigration.

    Democracy doesn't give us perfect levers, and we kid ourselves if we think our vote will give us everything that we want. There are millions of voters, and some of them have the temerity to want different things to us. But still - a tiny and erratic lever on the mechanisms of government is infinitely better than no lever at all.



  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417
    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    To be fair to Boris, he was always openly pro-immigration, and his admirers were not paying attention.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    Guide to UK voters on Thursday: don't vote like the French.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    Leon said:

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    I want their party dead
    Because they did what you asked them to do?
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464
    edited July 1
    148grss said:

    My sense is the Lib Dems are becoming the party of the well-to-do English upper middle classes in the posh areas.

    They don't register very much anywhere else.

    They're very strongly represented in the leafy S.W. London suburbs and throughout the West Country ... yes, I kinda know what you mean!
    Superficially the profile of the Lib Dem voter is very similar to that of a Green Party voter (or that might be changing this election); typically white and middle class from an area where Labour has never been the "natural" party to beat the Conservatives. The parties diverge mostly in their radicalism; both have systemic criticisms of the British political system (arguing in favour of PR, being more in favour of small d democratic reform) and have somewhat overlapping policy positions on largely popular issues (drug legalisation, environmental policies, more welfare spending). The LDs have a history of being more free marketers and friendly to capitalist interests, whereas the Green Party is an ecosocialist party.

    I think if the Greens can breakthrough and get 3-4 MPs at this election and come second in multiple other seats, we'll see them being as popular as the LDs quite quickly; I know that hypothetical polling isn't always worth the words used to conduct them, but those I've seen asking how people would vote if they had PR / didn't feel the need to vote tactically had the Greens polling above the LDs.
    I know it is a simplification but as the Lib Dems slipped below 20% and nearer 10% at times, the Greens have emerged to account for the gap -I first saw this in the Euros of 1989
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    Leon said:

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    I want their party dead
    They might have been reduced to less than 50 seats had Farage not gaffed with Putin and also allowing some extreme candidates to stand.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532
    Cookie said:

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    The point being, since Brexit we can now vote out parties who fail to deal with immigration. Hurray!

    Unfortunately we can only do this by replacing them with a party which is even more pro-immigration.

    Democracy doesn't give us perfect levers, and we kid ourselves if we think our vote will give us everything that we want. There are millions of voters, and some of them have the temerity to want different things to us. But still - a tiny and erratic lever on the mechanisms of government is infinitely better than no lever at all.



    So in the end we will be forced to vote like the French. This is the enraging thing

    In the end voters will vote for Nazis if that is the only way of delivering what they want. And they will do that
  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    So Survation MRP due Tuesday with ‘Final Call’ adjustments on Wednesday, where they will rectify things like North Shropshire on their MRP.

    Do we know any other pollsters doing last minute adjustments like this?
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,449
    edited July 1
    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    From the man himself in May 2016;

    In our desperation to meet our hopeless so-called targets, we push away brilliant students from Commonwealth countries, who want to pay to come to our universities; we find ourselves hard pressed to recruit people who might work in our NHS, as opposed to make use of its services – because we have absolutely no power to control the numbers who are coming with no job offers and no qualifications from the 28 EU countries. I am in favour of immigration; but I am also in favour of control, and of politicians taking responsibility for what is happening; and I think it bewilders people to be told that this most basic power of a state – to decide who has the right to live and work in your country – has been taken away and now resides in Brussels.

    https://conservativehome.com/2016/05/09/boris-johnsons-speech-on-the-eu-referendum-full-text/

    But none of us were listening. Not really listening.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    Nunu5 said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    Probably say Trump is immune but for his particular crimes only.
    The Bush v Gore non -precedent precedent ...
  • TimSTimS Posts: 13,214
    Andy_JS said:

    Guide to UK voters on Thursday: don't vote like the French.

    21% for the yellow centrist party would be OK.
  • GhedebravGhedebrav Posts: 3,860

    https://x.com/whotargetsme/status/1807720494126227474?s=46

    Priti Patel (Witham, majority 25,669, 353rd safest Tory seat), has started running Facebook ads in the last couple of days. Very unlikely the seat will change hands.

    19th safest Tory seat.

    I've had Facebook ads from both the Lib Dems and Reform, but nothing from the Conservatives.

    Facebook almost definitely know my profile and everything about me, so they are targeting core Conservative voters and have the money to do it too. Even Reform.
    Recent report from whotargetsme showed the Conservative ad buy on meta to be rather inept, as well as being underfunded. Individual candidates may be doing a better job.

    Worth noting (saying this as someone who does digital advertising for a living) that targeting on FB etc. is generally not as good or as granular as you might think* (nor is it usually effective to hyper-target) - plus I understand that additional targeting restrictions are placed on political advertising.



    *Meta is still streets ahead of others though, excepting Google, which demonstrates why so many advertisers were able to bin of Twitter with ease.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    Sorry to hear that Heather Watson has been knocked out of Wimbledon already.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    Farooq said:

    If anyone doubts that Sunak needs to go, he's appeared this morning wearing a blue quarter zip sweater over a white shirt and it looks terrible. Defenestrate now.

    The size of his collars is a huge issue for me. The only Wykehamist I know who looks like he gets his shirts from Reiss.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,271
    Leon said:

    Cookie said:

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    The point being, since Brexit we can now vote out parties who fail to deal with immigration. Hurray!

    Unfortunately we can only do this by replacing them with a party which is even more pro-immigration.

    Democracy doesn't give us perfect levers, and we kid ourselves if we think our vote will give us everything that we want. There are millions of voters, and some of them have the temerity to want different things to us. But still - a tiny and erratic lever on the mechanisms of government is infinitely better than no lever at all.



    So in the end we will be forced to vote like the French. This is the enraging thing

    In the end voters will vote for Nazis if that is the only way of delivering what they want. And they will do that
    Denmark shows that it’s not that hard to avoid a populist wave if the mainstream parties deliver what people want.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,532
    edited July 1

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    From the man himself in May 2016;

    In our desperation to meet our hopeless so-called targets, we push away brilliant students from Commonwealth countries, who want to pay to come to our universities; we find ourselves hard pressed to recruit people who might work in our NHS, as opposed to make use of its services – because we have absolutely no power to control the numbers who are coming with no job offers and no qualifications from the 28 EU countries. I am in favour of immigration; but I am also in favour of control, and of politicians taking responsibility for what is happening; and I think it bewilders people to be told that this most basic power of a state – to decide who has the right to live and work in your country – has been taken away and now resides in Brussels.

    https://conservativehome.com/2016/05/09/boris-johnsons-speech-on-the-eu-referendum-full-text/

    But none of us were listening. Not really listening.
    At what point does he say “this means migration will triple”

    At what point does he say “I want control over who comes here! But this does not mean we can control people who simply get on a boat and cross the channel - we can’t control them at all. So we will have no controls really. Also we will allow students to bring their grandmothers from Lagos. Thanks”


    And as for “taking responsibility” oh my holy Jesus. Fuck them. Kill them on Thursday
  • highwayparadise306highwayparadise306 Posts: 1,274
    On the subject of fantasy politics. Can anyone on here propose a different scenario to a labour majority. The more humorous the better! Such as the coalition being made up of Reform with 3 seat. The Greens with 5 and the SNP with 20 being part of the Rainbow coalition l.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417
    Boris was, I think, worse than the header implies. It is not just that he screwed the electoral pooch but that, aiui, he got rid of half the Tories' ministerial talent and, worse, replaced an experienced and competent Number 10 team with his Vote Leave chums, and then sacked the only one of them who had any sort of vision. Liz Truss doubled down on this so by the time Rishi came in, there was no-one in Downing Street who could look out the window to see if it was raining, let alone work an umbrella.

    So it is not just that Boris made the party unpopular, he barred any hope of its recovery.
  • highwayparadise306highwayparadise306 Posts: 1,274
    Ghedebrav said:

    https://x.com/whotargetsme/status/1807720494126227474?s=46

    Priti Patel (Witham, majority 25,669, 353rd safest Tory seat), has started running Facebook ads in the last couple of days. Very unlikely the seat will change hands.

    19th safest Tory seat.

    I've had Facebook ads from both the Lib Dems and Reform, but nothing from the Conservatives.

    Facebook almost definitely know my profile and everything about me, so they are targeting core Conservative voters and have the money to do it too. Even Reform.
    Recent report from whotargetsme showed the Conservative ad buy on meta to be rather inept, as well as being underfunded. Individual candidates may be doing a better job.

    Worth noting (saying this as someone who does digital advertising for a living) that targeting on FB etc. is generally not as good or as granular as you might think* (nor is it usually effective to hyper-target) - plus I understand that additional targeting restrictions are placed on political advertising.



    *Meta is still streets ahead of others though, excepting Google, which demonstrates why so many advertisers were able to bin of Twitter with ease.
    I agree with you.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    From the man himself in May 2016;

    In our desperation to meet our hopeless so-called targets, we push away brilliant students from Commonwealth countries, who want to pay to come to our universities; we find ourselves hard pressed to recruit people who might work in our NHS, as opposed to make use of its services – because we have absolutely no power to control the numbers who are coming with no job offers and no qualifications from the 28 EU countries. I am in favour of immigration; but I am also in favour of control, and of politicians taking responsibility for what is happening; and I think it bewilders people to be told that this most basic power of a state – to decide who has the right to live and work in your country – has been taken away and now resides in Brussels.

    https://conservativehome.com/2016/05/09/boris-johnsons-speech-on-the-eu-referendum-full-text/

    But none of us were listening. Not really listening.
    It is of course gibberish from Boris but you are also right in what you say. Small children in Havant could have told you that if we stop immigration from one place, given the way our society is structured, we would get it from another.

    And his point about control is also bolleaux. We always had the control to reduce immigration just that we choose not to. For any number of valid and/or lazy reasons.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 14,069
    Leon said:

    boulay said:

    Leon said:

    Not quite seeing the point of Dinard

    Yes it’s pleasant. But I can get all this in England with better food and England is more interesting

    It’s definitely more a summer weekends and high summer place. It’s then full of pretty people dressed well but a nice casual beachside feel. Full bars and those great cheesy French nightclubs that you fall out of as it’s getting light.
    It’s just a bit dull and too similar to Britain without the advantages of being Britain - salty seaside pubs and gnarly old history and everything so insanely crowded together it becomes fascinating in itself

    However you were quite right about Dinan - it’s gorgeous - so I remain grateful!

    Also I just made €5,000 selling a flint to design to Poland so I am still in love with the European mainland. Just not Dinard
    I remember Dinan (1987 - same trip as having the oyster in Dinard). I was 12, on a school trip. Fairly difficult to impress with prettiness - or anything, really. (Certainly difficult to impress with oysters). And yet Dinan really made an impact. Just gorgeous. Warm, sultry, fairytale town. Sitting on the fountain, drinking Orangina and eating weird continental ice creams and crepes, trading insults with friends, and happily wondering which of the girls I fancied, and whether any of them were in the crossover area of the Venn diagram with girls who would talk to me. In such a happy and dreamy and fantastical spot, it seemed like perhaps all of them did.
  • highwayparadise306highwayparadise306 Posts: 1,274
    TOPPING said:

    Farooq said:

    If anyone doubts that Sunak needs to go, he's appeared this morning wearing a blue quarter zip sweater over a white shirt and it looks terrible. Defenestrate now.

    The size of his collars is a huge issue for me. The only Wykehamist I know who looks like he gets his shirts from Reiss.
    He shops in Primart.
  • highwayparadise306highwayparadise306 Posts: 1,274
    Andy_JS said:

    Sorry to hear that Heather Watson has been knocked out of Wimbledon already.

    That was quick. Where is Tim Henman?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    Leon said:

    TOPPING said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.
    I do not recall the Tories ever saying “yeah, after Brexit, net migration will double or triple” - because they never did

    It was an act of base fraudulence and outrageous irresponsibility. It was worse than Blair’s stupidity over the EU accession countries

    We will be dealing with the fall out for decades. We could go the way of Sweden. Who the fuck have we let in, 2.4m people in 3 years??

    You probably couldn’t get higher net migration figures if you literally abandoned all controls

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You're not listening to the PB Brexiters. They all line up to say that Brexit wasn't about immigration and they should know. It was about sovereignty, they say, and increasing immigration by kazillions since 2016 was the sovereign act of a sovereign nation so job done by the Cons.

    I trust they can rely on your vote.
    From the man himself in May 2016;

    In our desperation to meet our hopeless so-called targets, we push away brilliant students from Commonwealth countries, who want to pay to come to our universities; we find ourselves hard pressed to recruit people who might work in our NHS, as opposed to make use of its services – because we have absolutely no power to control the numbers who are coming with no job offers and no qualifications from the 28 EU countries. I am in favour of immigration; but I am also in favour of control, and of politicians taking responsibility for what is happening; and I think it bewilders people to be told that this most basic power of a state – to decide who has the right to live and work in your country – has been taken away and now resides in Brussels.

    https://conservativehome.com/2016/05/09/boris-johnsons-speech-on-the-eu-referendum-full-text/

    But none of us were listening. Not really listening.
    At what point does he say “this means migration will triple”

    At what point does he say “I want control over who comes here! But this does not mean we can control people who simply get on a boat and cross the channel - we can’t control them at all. So we will have no controls really. Also we will allow students to bring their grandmothers from Lagos. Thanks”


    And as for “taking responsibility” oh my holy Jesus. Fuck them. Kill them on Thursday
    Are grandmothers from Lagos a particular problem in Delancey St?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    edited July 1
    Pulpstar said:

    Top of the list for candidate names from the excellent democracy club resource

    A one Captain Beany, standing in Aberafon Maestag !

    He's stood in most elections since 1992, getting 3.6% or 1,137 votes in 2015.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    148grss said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Nigelb said:

    Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity should be out around 10am Eastern time.

    6 - 3 ruling with opinions by Alito and Thomas arguing the 6 should have gone further
    I mean, obviously the following is a joke and the Dems wouldn't do it: but if the ruling does accept the Trump teams legal theory then Biden could do the funniest thing and have Trump whacked. The Trump team did argue it would be legal for the President to assassinate a political rival or to do a coup, so they can't complain if Biden then does it...

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/25/trump-attorney-john-sauer-doubles-down-on-argument-that-presidents-are-immune-from-assassinating-political-rivals-at-supreme-court/
    Well, they can complain - just not to the courts.

    The reality is, though, that Trump's GOP is far more likely to abuse presidential power than are the Democrats.
    Which is why we are where we are.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406

    So Survation MRP due Tuesday with ‘Final Call’ adjustments on Wednesday, where they will rectify things like North Shropshire on their MRP.

    Do we know any other pollsters doing last minute adjustments like this?

    It's a bit of a nonsense to create an MRP then stick an oar into individual constituencies when you realise it looks obviously wrong. Just negates the whole point of the exercise to some degree. I'm sticking with their original work in my spreadsheet.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417

    On the subject of fantasy politics. Can anyone on here propose a different scenario to a labour majority. The more humorous the better! Such as the coalition being made up of Reform with 3 seat. The Greens with 5 and the SNP with 20 being part of the Rainbow coalition l.

    Jeremy wins Islington North and half the Labour Party falls in behind him over the issue of house-building on green field allotments. 200 seats for Labour, 200 for Corbynite Labour, and Rishi Sunak returns as Prime Minister leading an unstable minority government.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,918

    Boris was, I think, worse than the header implies. It is not just that he screwed the electoral pooch but that, aiui, he got rid of half the Tories' ministerial talent and, worse, replaced an experienced and competent Number 10 team with his Vote Leave chums, and then sacked the only one of them who had any sort of vision. Liz Truss doubled down on this so by the time Rishi came in, there was no-one in Downing Street who could look out the window to see if it was raining, let alone work an umbrella.

    So it is not just that Boris made the party unpopular, he barred any hope of its recovery.

    I think the Tories electing Boris was a kind of Faustian pact. Yes they got Brexit - the dream of the Tory right for decades- but at the cost of hollowing the party of talent, importing Boris’ loose standards into government, and setting themselves up for an epochal fall from power.

    Its hard to really feel too sorry for them.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,471
    Personally, I'm relieved that Boris has gone - I think he'd be doing significantly better than Sunak, though he'd still lose.

    Rather like Farage, there's a bunch of people for whom Boris can do no wrong, however heinous his misdemeanours. And Boris's bunch is much larger than Farage's.
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    edited July 1
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    As a onetime admirer of Boris I have to admit this is true

    The revelations that it was he that consciously and deliberately opened the migration floodgates - to the insane extent that 1 in 30 people in Britain came in the last 3 years - has finished him forever. The Tories will likely never be forgiven for this. I hope they die on Thursday

    The irony is that it's one of the few times in his life that he told the truth- he's always been upfront about being relaxed about immigration numbers. But in a sort of reverse Boy Who Cried Wolf, we were so used to disbelieving anything he said, that we all ignored it.

    For this, and this alone, every patriotic Briton must vote to exterminate the Tories on Thursday
    You are a disruptor and an anarchist. You are not a patriot. Your contempt for Britain seethes through almost every post.

    I am one of their biggest critics but I do not believe any true patriotic Briton would wish for the extermination of the Conservative Party. They have been the most successful democratically elected party in the western world. At their best they stand for the aspirations of many Britons. Unfortunately they are currently at their worst. But the answer is NOT for them to be exterminated but for them to come back.

    Shame on you.
  • MisterBedfordshireMisterBedfordshire Posts: 2,252
    edited July 1
    So, basically an open acknowledgement that financial institutions are being used as economic paramilitaries by the establishment to depose governments they don't like.

    As happened here a couple of years back

    "How markets are ready to ‘do the dirty job’ of fighting Le Pen
    Bond traders are already reacting to the risk of unfettered spending under National Rally."

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/07/01/how-markets-are-ready-to-do-dirty-job-fighting-le-pen/
This discussion has been closed.