Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The Battle of Tewkesbury – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,158
edited July 4 in General
imageThe Battle of Tewkesbury – politicalbetting.com

On the 4th May 1471 the Yorkist forces of Edward IV defeated the Lancastrian Army of Edward, Prince of Westminster in one of the most decisive battles of the Wars Of The Roses.   Although slightly outnumbered, the success of the White Rose gang was no great surprise and it is likely winning punters got little better than evens on their wagers.   Shrewd punters on the forthcoming election battle of Tewkesbury on July 4th 2024 may however do slightly better, and I shall explain why.

Read the full story here

«134567

Comments

  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    First like Starmer by a long margin
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    Second!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,601
    Tory candidate being looked into over election betting married to party's campaign director

    The BBC can reveal this morning that the Conservative candidate being looked into by the Gambling Commission over a bet relating to the timing of the general election is married to the party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Laura Saunders, the party’s candidate in Bristol North West, has worked for the Tories since 2015.

    It is not known when the bet was placed or for how much money.

    She is married to Tony Lee, who is the Conservative Party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Saunders has been approached for comment by the BBC and has not replied.

    A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: “We have been contacted by the Gambling Commission about a small number of individuals. As the Gambling Commission is an independent body, it wouldn’t be proper to comment further, until any process is concluded.”


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd119p9een9t
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,114
    edited June 20
    Again I am taking the Fifth.

    Good morning everyone, and thanks for the header.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,573
    The battle of Stansted:

    Now the morons are actually throwing paint on planes

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/20/just-stop-oil-targets-taylor-swift-airfield/

    Hope they realise that’s a million or two in damage they’ve caused there, and a few weeks they won’t be able to use the plane. Can’t wait for the civil lawsuit.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,601
    Watch the cricket from last night I see Phil Salt peppered the West Indian boundary so many times.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,485
    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,392
    Kate Forbes talking pure bollocks on BBC
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,590

    Watch the cricket from last night I see Phil Salt peppered the West Indian boundary so many times.

    On topic, feels like he's starting to cut the mustard.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,775
    FPT: I must wonder, is there a Chinese lab working on fungi?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,030

    Kate Forbes talking pure bollocks on BBC

    There was a Green lady on earlier doing the same.
    Nick Robbo got quite shirty.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    Oh dear, that makes it an order of magnitude worse.

    I was prepared to believe some Tory candidates would have randomly bet on this rather improbable date but this news if true stretches the long arm of coincidence way beyond the point of dislocation.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,585
    Thanks PtP.

    Bet placed on LibDems.
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 964

    Tory candidate being looked into over election betting married to party's campaign director

    The BBC can reveal this morning that the Conservative candidate being looked into by the Gambling Commission over a bet relating to the timing of the general election is married to the party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Laura Saunders, the party’s candidate in Bristol North West, has worked for the Tories since 2015.

    It is not known when the bet was placed or for how much money.

    She is married to Tony Lee, who is the Conservative Party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Saunders has been approached for comment by the BBC and has not replied.

    A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: “We have been contacted by the Gambling Commission about a small number of individuals. As the Gambling Commission is an independent body, it wouldn’t be proper to comment further, until any process is concluded.”


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd119p9een9t

    This party must be destroyed. (And I say that as someone who voted for them in 2010, 2015, 2019, not 2017 May was shit).
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,585

    Kate Forbes talking pure bollocks on BBC

    It would be more newsworthy if a politician wasn't.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,651

    Watch the cricket from last night I see Phil Salt peppered the West Indian boundary so many times.

    West Indies mustered no defence.
  • Nunu5Nunu5 Posts: 964
    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    Mrs Sunak?
  • AugustusCarp2AugustusCarp2 Posts: 225
    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    It's like the good old days of Tory Sleaze. Things like this cut through far more than witterings about comparative tax thresholds.

    (And PtP moved to Gloucestershire ... well I never! Always had him down as Metropolitan Elite personified. Very interesting observations from him, as always.)
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,392

    Kate Forbes talking pure bollocks on BBC

    It would be more newsworthy if a politician wasn't.
    Well yes, but she is meant to be the Head Haggis but one, a chieftain of finance, yet what she was saying had little to connect it to the world she lives in.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 21,968

    Watch the cricket from last night I see Phil Salt peppered the West Indian boundary so many times.

    A seasoned player, no doubt.
    Good to get a flavour of his talents.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    EPG said:

    Watch the cricket from last night I see Phil Salt peppered the West Indian boundary so many times.

    West Indies mustered no defence.
    What's the sauce of that allegation?
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,036
    edited June 20
    Edit - too slow on a pun.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,977

    (And PtP moved to Gloucestershire ... well I never! Always had him down as Metropolitan Elite personified. Very interesting observations from him, as always.)

    He has long maintained a country estate even while residing in the smoke...
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,585
    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    A yearning for unearned money runs deep through Conservative politicians.

    Together with an attitude that laws, regulations, ethics are for the 'little people'.

    They really should have employed someone like Cyclefree to explain issues such as insider trading and fraud.

    In addition to a H&S manager to maintain order in Downing Street and CCHQ during covid.
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,036
    Roger said:

    Tory candidate being looked into over election betting married to party's campaign director

    The BBC can reveal this morning that the Conservative candidate being looked into by the Gambling Commission over a bet relating to the timing of the general election is married to the party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Laura Saunders, the party’s candidate in Bristol North West, has worked for the Tories since 2015.

    It is not known when the bet was placed or for how much money.

    She is married to Tony Lee, who is the Conservative Party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Saunders has been approached for comment by the BBC and has not replied.

    A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: “We have been contacted by the Gambling Commission about a small number of individuals. As the Gambling Commission is an independent body, it wouldn’t be proper to comment further, until any process is concluded.”


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd119p9een9t

    Was HYUFD the only Tory who didn't know the election date in advance?
    Maybe they have clubbed together, made a large sum, and are all moving to South America after the election?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,540
    Political betting (in small letters) is the main item on the news. I can't remember that being the case before.
  • johntjohnt Posts: 166
    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983

    Great header Peter, these are the kinds of insights that PB excels at. My only local insight is that Labour's candidate Vicky Foxcroft is going to win Lewisham North. You heard it here first!

    I actually got a flyer from the scarlet pimpernel Vicky Foxcroft yesterday. The only sight or sound anyone gets of her every 5 years. Quite the contrast with her predecessor Joan Ruddock who was at every community event going and can still be seen out and about.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,977
    Andy_JS said:

    Political betting (in small letters) is the main item on the news. I can't remember that being the case before.

    Tory corruption is the main item...
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,485
    biggles said:

    Roger said:

    Tory candidate being looked into over election betting married to party's campaign director

    The BBC can reveal this morning that the Conservative candidate being looked into by the Gambling Commission over a bet relating to the timing of the general election is married to the party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Laura Saunders, the party’s candidate in Bristol North West, has worked for the Tories since 2015.

    It is not known when the bet was placed or for how much money.

    She is married to Tony Lee, who is the Conservative Party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Saunders has been approached for comment by the BBC and has not replied.

    A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: “We have been contacted by the Gambling Commission about a small number of individuals. As the Gambling Commission is an independent body, it wouldn’t be proper to comment further, until any process is concluded.”


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd119p9een9t

    Was HYUFD the only Tory who didn't know the election date in advance?
    Maybe they have clubbed together, made a large sum, and are all moving to South America after the election?
    Well I can imagine they are getting a Chile reception in some Tory circles right now.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,573

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    Oh dear, that makes it an order of magnitude worse.

    I was prepared to believe some Tory candidates would have randomly bet on this rather improbable date but this news if true stretches the long arm of coincidence way beyond the point of dislocation.
    Oh crap.

    Now we’re dealing not with people who might have heard a nudge or a rumour, but who actually had a role in influencing the decision, which would be the criminal standard.

    Looks like we might end up seeing CCHQ minutes read out at the magistrates’ court, and we’ll find out the timing of the decision for 4th July.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,496
    Betting post: If a serious wipeout occurs - Tories down to 60 or less, then the pool of MPs to be next Tory leader is tiny. Of those who may survive Tugendhat, Barclay and possibly Williamson are (relatively) noteworthy cheeses. Of those, Mr Hat (and Farage) are too short, but Barclay and Williamson are both long odds.

    Barclay has no rivals in international boring competitions but could he also be leader of the post corn law rump, the valiant 50 or so?

    These are just Throwaway remarks, suitable for Gold Cup day.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 35,977
    Sandpit said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    Oh dear, that makes it an order of magnitude worse.

    I was prepared to believe some Tory candidates would have randomly bet on this rather improbable date but this news if true stretches the long arm of coincidence way beyond the point of dislocation.
    Oh crap.

    Now we’re dealing not with people who might have heard a nudge or a rumour, but who actually had a role in influencing the decision, which would be the criminal standard.

    Looks like we might end up seeing CCHQ minutes read out at the magistrates’ court, and we’ll find out the timing of the decision for 4th July.
    "So, you're saying we can't win the next election, but Sid has a budgie which can predict the winners in horse racing?"
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,540
    Farooq said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I know one of those seats that's been earmarked as savable. Does anyone know the other?
    South Holland and the Deepings is probably the savable seat.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239
    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,485
    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I guess it depends where your WhatsApp has come from. If, for example, it was coming from Reform HQ expecting it to be disseminated on discussion sites and social media then I expect other reform people are hearing this.

    If the WhatsApp you received is from Tory HQ then it’s worth bearing in mind. So probably more enlightening if you old us the source of the WhatsApp no?
  • RazedabodeRazedabode Posts: 3,028
    Well well well. The Tory party is utterly toxic.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,687
    Great betting header to start the day!!!


  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,496
    Farooq said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I know one of those seats that's been earmarked as savable. Does anyone know the other?
    A renewed Battle of Maldon, last fought in 991?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,546

    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    A yearning for unearned money runs deep through Conservative politicians.

    Together with an attitude that laws, regulations, ethics are for the 'little people'.

    They really should have employed someone like Cyclefree to explain issues such as insider trading and fraud.

    In addition to a H&S manager to maintain order in Downing Street and CCHQ during covid.
    More than that: there are people who have an almost Trumpian desire for the win. They want to win, and ideally want to be seen to win. Winning is more important than honesty or propriety. Even when the 'win' is essentially meaningless.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983
    IF Reform do maintain their streak (I don't think they will, but let's speculate) and the conservatives are reduced to below 100 seats, we've all talked about what then likely happens with a Tory-Reform reverse takeover. Seems pretty likely. But what then happens with the never-Farage Tories?

    Let's also say the Lib Dems do spectacularly well and have 45 to 50 seats.

    We hit a fork in the road where party realignments potentially mean HM opposition is up for grabs. Do those one nation Tories (and there are still a few quiet remainers in there) look to join the Lib Dems, where they could depending on numbers make up a combined opposition? Would the Lib Dems take them? Or do they do what the GOP moderates did and reconcile themselves to denying the evidence of their eyes and ears and loving Nigel Farage?
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    SCOTLAND KLAXON
    New Scotland Only Westminster poll, Savanta 14-18 Jun (changes vs 24-28 May):

    Lab ~ 38% (+1)
    SNP ~ 33% (nc)
    Con ~ 15% (-2)
    LD ~ 7% (nc)
    https://x.com/BallotBoxScot/status/1803691113330377038?s=19
  • TweedledeeTweedledee Posts: 1,405

    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    A yearning for unearned money runs deep through Conservative politicians.

    Together with an attitude that laws, regulations, ethics are for the 'little people'.

    They really should have employed someone like Cyclefree to explain issues such as insider trading and fraud.

    In addition to a H&S manager to maintain order in Downing Street and CCHQ during covid.
    Like Keith Best and his multi application for BT shares

    He seems to have made the unlikely transition from Tory MP to decent bloke in the years since

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Best
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    Interesting article PtP. I don't bet myself but in the same vein William Hill apparently have the LDs at 66/1 in North Dorset with Labour at 9/1, Tories 1/16 with Bet365.

    Similar to Tewksbury, Labour aren't trying here - non-local candidate. Also Dorset Council fell to the LDs in the locals.

    Tory incumbent Simon Hoare is clearly the favourite but Reform have a candidate likely to peel off a sizeable chunk of hard right Tory support.

    I'd say it's an 80% Con, 20% LD chance. DYOR
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983
    Andy_JS said:

    Farooq said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I know one of those seats that's been earmarked as savable. Does anyone know the other?
    South Holland and the Deepings is probably the savable seat.
    They'll do fine in outer SE London. Bromley, Bexley etc. Their new heartland.

    Essentially the Tories will do relatively well in places with 1930s housing and large paved front drives.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,883
    Nunu5 said:

    Tory candidate being looked into over election betting married to party's campaign director

    The BBC can reveal this morning that the Conservative candidate being looked into by the Gambling Commission over a bet relating to the timing of the general election is married to the party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Laura Saunders, the party’s candidate in Bristol North West, has worked for the Tories since 2015.

    It is not known when the bet was placed or for how much money.

    She is married to Tony Lee, who is the Conservative Party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Saunders has been approached for comment by the BBC and has not replied.

    A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: “We have been contacted by the Gambling Commission about a small number of individuals. As the Gambling Commission is an independent body, it wouldn’t be proper to comment further, until any process is concluded.”


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd119p9een9t

    This party must be destroyed. (And I say that as someone who voted for them in 2010, 2015, 2019, not 2017 May was shit).
    Maybe they'll give you first dibs next time?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,540
    edited June 20
    "Labour could become a ‘forever government’, warns Gove

    If Labour win a big majority on July 4 the party could “rig the system” to create a “forever government”, Michael Gove has claimed. "

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/20/general-election-latest-news-sunak-starmer-farage/
  • CCHQ yesterday told candidates it is redirecting campaign resources away from many Tory-held seats toward ultra-safe seats *

    * This will be seen as a tacit admission the Tories are conceding the election and are now trying to avoid wipeout *

    https://x.com/alexwickham/status/1803699718507123176

    It seems safe to say it is going to be a Labour victory.
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 4,513
    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    Someone is actually directing the Tory campaign? ?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    edited June 20
    TimS said:

    IF Reform do maintain their streak (I don't think they will, but let's speculate) and the conservatives are reduced to below 100 seats, we've all talked about what then likely happens with a Tory-Reform reverse takeover. Seems pretty likely. But what then happens with the never-Farage Tories?

    Let's also say the Lib Dems do spectacularly well and have 45 to 50 seats.

    We hit a fork in the road where party realignments potentially mean HM opposition is up for grabs. Do those one nation Tories (and there are still a few quiet remainers in there) look to join the Lib Dems, where they could depending on numbers make up a combined opposition? Would the Lib Dems take them? Or do they do what the GOP moderates did and reconcile themselves to denying the evidence of their eyes and ears and loving Nigel Farage?

    We're seeing evidence for that already, with former Tories from Heseltine through Stewart voting LibDem and Soubry switching straight to Labour. The pro-Brexit moderate Tories will otherwise be homeless if things pan out as they currently look.

    Meanwhile I begin to wonder about my own seat, which the MRPs have as a Labour gain but I was anticipating a Tory hold. The Tory candidate is able and relatively moderate whereas the Labour candidate is dire and was imposed on them by HQ. At the hustings the Tory is coming across well, but so is the Reform woman, despite some of her views, and the YouGov MRP, which builds on a local sample, gives Reform a shout. In an hour's time the relatively energetic primary campaign declares its 'people's champion' to defeat the Tories, likely to be the Labour candidate, and it will be interesting to see how that goes down.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    Did we do the Ashcroft poll last night?
    Lab 43
    Con 18
    Ref 18
    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/
  • johntjohnt Posts: 166
    boulay said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I guess it depends where your WhatsApp has come from. If, for example, it was coming from Reform HQ expecting it to be disseminated on discussion sites and social media then I expect other reform people are hearing this.

    If the WhatsApp you received is from Tory HQ then it’s worth bearing in mind. So probably more enlightening if you old us the source of the WhatsApp no?
    Not sure where it comes from will help, but the claim was it is being reported by Michael Crick. So just wondered if others had seen it. I cannot find an independent verification at this stage.
  • SteveSSteveS Posts: 182
    Top tip PtP. Have gone either way on this one.

    Would repay the favour if there was any value in my local constituency but there’s not
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895
    Looking again at that Torygraph front page, I have to wonder are the Tories approaching the Roche limit where the gravitational pull of Farage on their voters becomes to much and they get torn apart?
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 21,968
    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    Be fair, maybe the Tory MP wasn't kooking forward to claiming Jobseekers Allowance in a couple of weeks time? 😉
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,601

    Did we do the Ashcroft poll last night?
    Lab 43
    Con 18
    Ref 18
    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/

    Doesn't count, not a member of the BPC.
  • Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,337
    On topic: I guess the probable Labour overstatement in the MRPs etc is down to how well they scored in 2019. They picked up the anti-Tory vote almost everywhere, with a relatively close vote to the Tories nationally. Of course, the extra was thinly-spread and of no electoral use, but as a starting point for this year, it puts them ahead of the LibDems in many “Tory” areas.

    It’s driving through into tactical voting guides too (understandably enough): South Shropshire had Lab and LibDems neck and neck in 2019, but had a two-term LD incumbent 1997-2005 who’s standing again now, and close seconds in 05 and 10. Instinctively, it *feels* more LibDemmy. But the tactical voting guides all say Lab or too close to call.

    I suspect the same would be true in North Shropshire, if the LD by-election victory (by a locally-active, now frontbench MP) hadn’t trumped 2019
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,485
    johnt said:

    boulay said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I guess it depends where your WhatsApp has come from. If, for example, it was coming from Reform HQ expecting it to be disseminated on discussion sites and social media then I expect other reform people are hearing this.

    If the WhatsApp you received is from Tory HQ then it’s worth bearing in mind. So probably more enlightening if you old us the source of the WhatsApp no?
    Not sure where it comes from will help, but the claim was it is being reported by Michael Crick. So just wondered if others had seen it. I cannot find an independent verification at this stage.
    Where things come from can be vital, if Putin claims something you will trust its veracity one way, if Mary Berry says something you will know it’s propaganda.

    On the actual point though, it would be crazy if the Tories weren’t pulling all resources from hopeless seats.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,585
    Andy_JS said:

    "Labour could become a ‘forever government’, warns Gove

    If Labour win a big majority on July 4 the party could “rig the system” to create a “forever government”, Michael Gove has claimed. "

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/20/general-election-latest-news-sunak-starmer-farage/

    He should have been saying that to his fellow Conservative politicians from 2019 onwards instead of former Conservative voters now.

    But Conservative politicians seem to think it is only the 'little people' who have obligations and responsibilities.
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,883
    boulay said:

    biggles said:

    Roger said:

    Tory candidate being looked into over election betting married to party's campaign director

    The BBC can reveal this morning that the Conservative candidate being looked into by the Gambling Commission over a bet relating to the timing of the general election is married to the party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Laura Saunders, the party’s candidate in Bristol North West, has worked for the Tories since 2015.

    It is not known when the bet was placed or for how much money.

    She is married to Tony Lee, who is the Conservative Party’s Director of Campaigns.

    Saunders has been approached for comment by the BBC and has not replied.

    A Conservative Party spokesman told the BBC: “We have been contacted by the Gambling Commission about a small number of individuals. As the Gambling Commission is an independent body, it wouldn’t be proper to comment further, until any process is concluded.”


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd119p9een9t

    Was HYUFD the only Tory who didn't know the election date in advance?
    Maybe they have clubbed together, made a large sum, and are all moving to South America after the election?
    Well I can imagine they are getting a Chile reception in some Tory circles right now.
    It should ginger up the race a little more
  • boulayboulay Posts: 5,485

    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    Be fair, maybe the Tory MP wasn't kooking forward to claiming Jobseekers Allowance in a couple of weeks time? 😉
    Not even a Tory MP about to have to find a new career.
  • kamskikamski Posts: 5,189

    dixiedean said:

    Disgusted with these juvenile sauce puns. I'm logging off.
    Tartare for now.

    And hey pesto! He's gone.
    Whoosh! too sure - soz.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,207
    johnt said:

    boulay said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I guess it depends where your WhatsApp has come from. If, for example, it was coming from Reform HQ expecting it to be disseminated on discussion sites and social media then I expect other reform people are hearing this.

    If the WhatsApp you received is from Tory HQ then it’s worth bearing in mind. So probably more enlightening if you old us the source of the WhatsApp no?
    Not sure where it comes from will help, but the claim was it is being reported by Michael Crick. So just wondered if others had seen it. I cannot find an independent verification at this stage.
    Alex Wickham has the same story;

    * EXCLUSIVE: CCHQ yesterday told candidates it is redirecting campaign resources away from many Tory-held seats toward ultra-safe seats *

    * This will be seen as a tacit admission the Tories are conceding the election and are now trying to avoid wipeout *

    — CCHQ on Wednesday told Tory candidates in several seats *who are defending majorities of over 10,000* that their funds and favorable access to party activists was being withdrawn

    — resources are being moved to other seats with larger majorities


    https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/1803699718507123176

    Too little, too late?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    It just needs a WH Smiths with a wooden sign....
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809

    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    A yearning for unearned money runs deep through Conservative politicians.

    Together with an attitude that laws, regulations, ethics are for the 'little people'.

    They really should have employed someone like Cyclefree to explain issues such as insider trading and fraud.

    In addition to a H&S manager to maintain order in Downing Street and CCHQ during covid.
    Like Keith Best and his multi application for BT shares

    He seems to have made the unlikely transition from Tory MP to decent bloke in the years since

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Best
    Brings back memories - not least the thought at the time "wtf did he do that for, such a small sum which would get caught out?!?" - just as others are commenting here re the election date bets.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239
    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    As someone who's ridden the Hell of the North Cotswolds - which starts in Winchcombe - a couple of times I can vouch that there are definitely some steep hills.
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 495
    Surely the health warning on betting based on Lib Dem leaflets is in even bigger than MRPs :)?
    In my area the Lib Dems have been saying it's not a Labour target, but the Labour office was buzzing on a Saturday morning while their office was closed. May not be the same in Tewkesbury of course.
  • TweedledeeTweedledee Posts: 1,405
    Torridge and Tavistock (scene of the rishi sheep feeding debacle last week) is knife edge. Oddschecker has con 1/3 lab 9/4 which looks too short/long. But big Geoff Cox (for it is he) has strong incumbency energy.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,239

    Interesting article PtP. I don't bet myself but in the same vein William Hill apparently have the LDs at 66/1 in North Dorset with Labour at 9/1, Tories 1/16 with Bet365.

    Similar to Tewksbury, Labour aren't trying here - non-local candidate. Also Dorset Council fell to the LDs in the locals.

    Tory incumbent Simon Hoare is clearly the favourite but Reform have a candidate likely to peel off a sizeable chunk of hard right Tory support.

    I'd say it's an 80% Con, 20% LD chance. DYOR

    This is a very good tip and if Hills hadn't blocked me then I'd be putting some money on that.
  • Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,337

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    Someone is actually directing the Tory campaign? ?
    Funny they bet they n the date, not the result!!
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809
    boulay said:

    johnt said:

    boulay said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I guess it depends where your WhatsApp has come from. If, for example, it was coming from Reform HQ expecting it to be disseminated on discussion sites and social media then I expect other reform people are hearing this.

    If the WhatsApp you received is from Tory HQ then it’s worth bearing in mind. So probably more enlightening if you old us the source of the WhatsApp no?
    Not sure where it comes from will help, but the claim was it is being reported by Michael Crick. So just wondered if others had seen it. I cannot find an independent verification at this stage.
    Where things come from can be vital, if Putin claims something you will trust its veracity one way, if Mary Berry says something you will know it’s propaganda.

    On the actual point though, it would be crazy if the Tories weren’t pulling all resources from hopeless seats.
    Mary Berry, the domestic science lady?!?
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061

    Did we do the Ashcroft poll last night?
    Lab 43
    Con 18
    Ref 18
    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/

    Doesn't count, not a member of the BPC.
    Wasn't aware of that! Cheers
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,767
    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    Great checklist - pretty much explains the liberal anomaly of NE Fife. Liberalism survives in those parts of the country left broadly unchanged by the industrial revolution.
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 495

    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    Be fair, maybe the Tory MP wasn't kooking forward to claiming Jobseekers Allowance in a couple of weeks time? 😉
    Clearly not very bright, a cash bet on the high street and at worse they'd have been looking at CCTV, a bit more care and they'd have spread it over a few shops.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,030
    The Tory campaign - and party - has gone a bit Arrested Development.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwQW3KW3DCc
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 54,573

    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    As someone who's ridden the Hell of the North Cotswolds - which starts in Winchcombe - a couple of times I can vouch that there are definitely some steep hills.
    It’s much nicer being in a glider, soaring up and down the ridge line in a NW breeze. You can go from Broadway all the way down to Bath.

    https://www.winchcombewelcomeswalkers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Cotswolds-Map.jpg
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,601

    Did we do the Ashcroft poll last night?
    Lab 43
    Con 18
    Ref 18
    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/

    Doesn't count, not a member of the BPC.
    Wasn't aware of that! Cheers
    I mean the good Lord adheres to all the BPC disclosure rules though.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,114
    FPT:
    Sandpit said:

    The battle of Stansted:

    Now the morons are actually throwing paint on planes

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/20/just-stop-oil-targets-taylor-swift-airfield/

    Hope they realise that’s a million or two in damage they’ve caused there, and a few weeks they won’t be able to use the plane. Can’t wait for the civil lawsuit.

    Have there been any civil cases taken out in such circumstances?

    I would like to see them, but I do not recall any examples.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,342
    Dopermean said:

    boulay said:

    IanB2 said:

    Breaking - the mystery second Tory better is the wife of the Tory campaigns director!

    What the f is wrong with these people - they can’t be winning a life changing amount of money so why risk the hassle which anyone with a brain cell would understand would come if found out.

    The only thing I can think of is that they are a bit needy and wanted to show people they know the winning betting slip so they can demonstrate their amazing insight and knowledge as it cannot be the money.
    Be fair, maybe the Tory MP wasn't kooking forward to claiming Jobseekers Allowance in a couple of weeks time? 😉
    Clearly not very bright, a cash bet on the high street and at worse they'd have been looking at CCTV, a bit more care and they'd have spread it over a few shops.
    People do it all the time. People on big salaries get caught doing minor scams - because they think they can get away with it.

    It’s looking now as if Reform are moving into second place, in voting intentions.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,348
    edited June 20
    The Lib Dems have flattered to deceive at every general election in my memory, but if they were to win Tewkesbury then this election would break that sequence.

    I think the Reform surge in the polling indicates a rootless electorate, willing to be persuaded to vote for any one of a range of parties, but not yet particularly convinced by any.

    I expect Labour to poll well north of 10% here, despite not trying, and for the Tory to be saved as a consequence.

    The incumbent Tory, Laurence Robertson, has a part-time job on the Betting and Gaming Council, so, one never knows, he might be a lurker here.
  • TweedledeeTweedledee Posts: 1,405

    Did we do the Ashcroft poll last night?
    Lab 43
    Con 18
    Ref 18
    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/

    Doesn't count, not a member of the BPC.
    Wasn't aware of that! Cheers
    I mean the good Lord adheres to all the BPC disclosure rules though.
    Sample size 5187 adults -,does he actually have the machinery to do that or is he just rebadging the output of others?
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983

    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    Great checklist - pretty much explains the liberal anomaly of NE Fife. Liberalism survives in those parts of the country left broadly unchanged by the industrial revolution.
    And before that, perhaps equally importantly, untouched by the open field system and then enclosure. Regions, like Western France with its Macron-voting bocage, that never had lord-serf social relations.

    Explains why unindustrialised areas of the East Midlands and Eastern England vote Reform rather than Lib Dem.

    And dates back further still to the Danelaw vs the Anglo Saxon kingdoms.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,874
    There is an excellent re enactment of the battle of Tewkesbury every July I used to go to when I lived in Herefordshire which re enactors from around the world took part in.

    On the political battle of Tewkesbury I expect a Tory hold. The opposition vote will be split between Labour and LD and Tewkesbury voted Leave unlikely Cheltenham and some other Cotswold seats that voted Remain and are better prospects for the yellows
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,540
    edited June 20
    Sandpit said:

    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    As someone who's ridden the Hell of the North Cotswolds - which starts in Winchcombe - a couple of times I can vouch that there are definitely some steep hills.
    It’s much nicer being in a glider, soaring up and down the ridge line in a NW breeze. You can go from Broadway all the way down to Bath.

    https://www.winchcombewelcomeswalkers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Cotswolds-Map.jpg
    I've been in a glider a few times, although not in that area. Very relaxing.
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 495
    IanB2 said:

    TimS said:

    IF Reform do maintain their streak (I don't think they will, but let's speculate) and the conservatives are reduced to below 100 seats, we've all talked about what then likely happens with a Tory-Reform reverse takeover. Seems pretty likely. But what then happens with the never-Farage Tories?

    Let's also say the Lib Dems do spectacularly well and have 45 to 50 seats.

    We hit a fork in the road where party realignments potentially mean HM opposition is up for grabs. Do those one nation Tories (and there are still a few quiet remainers in there) look to join the Lib Dems, where they could depending on numbers make up a combined opposition? Would the Lib Dems take them? Or do they do what the GOP moderates did and reconcile themselves to denying the evidence of their eyes and ears and loving Nigel Farage?

    We're seeing evidence for that already, with former Tories from Heseltine through Stewart voting LibDem and Soubry switching straight to Labour. The pro-Brexit moderate Tories will otherwise be homeless if things pan out as they currently look.

    Meanwhile I begin to wonder about my own seat, which the MRPs have as a Labour gain but I was anticipating a Tory hold. The Tory candidate is able and relatively moderate whereas the Labour candidate is dire and was imposed on them by HQ. At the hustings the Tory is coming across well, but so is the Reform woman, despite some of her views, and the YouGov MRP, which builds on a local sample, gives Reform a shout. In an hour's time the relatively energetic primary campaign declares its 'people's champion' to defeat the Tories, likely to be the Labour candidate, and it will be interesting to see how that goes down.
    Lib Dems would be happier displacing the moderate Conservatives on the centre-right than pretending they're centre/centre-left.
    Then if PR comes in they can form a "centre-right" coalition LD/Con/Reform as per rest of Europe.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859

    Torridge and Tavistock (scene of the rishi sheep feeding debacle last week) is knife edge. Oddschecker has con 1/3 lab 9/4 which looks too short/long. But big Geoff Cox (for it is he) has strong incumbency energy.

    Yougov has the Tories clear there, with the LibDems in second and a strong showing by Reform, putting Labour fourth. Could be a Tory hold on a low-ish percentage?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,601

    Did we do the Ashcroft poll last night?
    Lab 43
    Con 18
    Ref 18
    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/

    Doesn't count, not a member of the BPC.
    Wasn't aware of that! Cheers
    I mean the good Lord adheres to all the BPC disclosure rules though.
    Sample size 5187 adults -,does he actually have the machinery to do that or is he just rebadging the output of others?
    He uses other BPC pollsters to do the fieldwork then his team does weighting etc.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,160
    Andy_JS said:

    Farooq said:

    johnt said:

    I have had a WhatsApp this morning claiming that conservative head office is planning to call candidates and tell them their seats are lost and resources are being pulled back to try and save ‘safe’ seats. Is anyone else hearing this? I guess given today’s news we should just look for betting patterns. Bets on seemingly unlikely Tory losses may be coming from HQ and may be a sign it is happening.

    I know one of those seats that's been earmarked as savable. Does anyone know the other?
    South Holland and the Deepings is probably the savable seat.
    Maldon looks saveable too.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 12,983
    TimS said:

    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    Great checklist - pretty much explains the liberal anomaly of NE Fife. Liberalism survives in those parts of the country left broadly unchanged by the industrial revolution.
    And before that, perhaps equally importantly, untouched by the open field system and then enclosure. Regions, like Western France with its Macron-voting bocage, that never had lord-serf social relations.

    Explains why unindustrialised areas of the East Midlands and Eastern England vote Reform rather than Lib Dem.

    And dates back further still to the Danelaw vs the Anglo Saxon kingdoms.
    And it's notable that the Lib Dem parts of London are where all the rugby clubs are.

    My personal theory is that the South West London LD heartland is a metastasis of Wessex, bringing its political norms and sporting preferences with it - it's the bit of the capital closest to the M3 and M4 so it's where people from those regions choose to live when they move to London.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,874

    TimS said:

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    Great header.

    I am reminded that PtP and I had a conversation about whether Tewkesbury would be a LibDem target back in 2019:

    https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/2159977#Comment_2159977

    It ticks the Lib Dem boxes:

    Cathedral (well OK, abbey): check
    Orchards, Vineyards or Cattle: check
    Rugby clubs: check
    Steep hills: sort of...in the distance
    Fuck off great big yellow diamond signboards: check
    Great checklist - pretty much explains the liberal anomaly of NE Fife. Liberalism survives in those parts of the country left broadly unchanged by the industrial revolution.
    The LDs were also second in Chelsea and Fulham in 2019 and Cities of London and Westminster and do well in spa towns, holding Bath and with Tunbridge Wells, Cheltenham and Harrogate and Knaresborough on their target list.

    Basically along with having a Waitrose and Gales, having a LD MP or the LDs second to the Tories at the last general election is a good indicator of poshness
This discussion has been closed.