Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

The Return of the King at 100/1? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 11,688
edited March 12 in General
imageThe Return of the King at 100/1? – politicalbetting.com

Why it’s unlikely Lord Cameron would become PM again despite Tory plots to oust Sunak ? One MP tells @theipaper the Foreign Secretary is being floated by Tory plotters as a potential 'unity candidate' before the election? Analysis by @poppyeh https://t.co/LNeJFW39To

Read the full story here

«134567

Comments

  • Options
    Lord Cameron could, even while retaining his peerage, relinquish his right to sit in the Lords and then be elected as a Conservative MP and then be elected party leader (who must sit in the House of Commons) and thus Prime Minister. That might be worth 100/1 since a safe seat can be arranged.

    But the scheme discussed in the header for a PM in the House of Lords which even in 1940 was unacceptable, is far more than a 100/1 shot.


  • Options

    Lord Cameron could, even while retaining his peerage, relinquish his right to sit in the Lords and then be elected as a Conservative MP and then be elected party leader (who must sit in the House of Commons) and thus Prime Minister. That might be worth 100/1 since a safe seat can be arranged.

    But the scheme discussed in the header for a PM in the House of Lords which even in 1940 was unacceptable, is far more than a 100/1 shot.

    On second thoughts, the header, and I, have the wrong precedent by two decades. In 1963, Sir Alec Douglas-Home was still a peer when appointed Prime Minister although he then renounced his peerage (which Lord Cameron cannot do as a Life Peer rather than a Hereditary Peer) and was elected to the Commons within three weeks of his appointment.
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,289
    It may seem a laughable idea but the reality is that it is almost certain that the Conservatives would do better at the next GE with Cameron as leader than they would with anybody else.

    How you arrange the mechanics I don't know. It would have to be along the lines of Sunak remaining PM until the GE, Cameron giving up his Peerage, Cameron fighting a safe seat at the GE on the basis he would then become leader post GE.

    I guess technically he could become leader as soon as Parliament is dissolved because at that point there are no Conervative MPs and someone has to be leader if Rishi resigned as leader.

    But I think it would be best for Rishi to remain PM until GE day to avoid charges of an unelected PM. But the Conservative Party would campaign on the basis that Cameron would take over the day after the GE.
  • Options
    Penddu2Penddu2 Posts: 595
    Fourth - the position Wales aspire to in this 6 Nations.
  • Options
    Penddu2Penddu2 Posts: 595
    Penddu2 said:

    Fourth - the position Wales aspire to in this 6 Nations.

    And will probably be disappointed....
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,430
    edited February 13
    How is a Prime Minister appointed?
    https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/how-is-a-prime-minister-appointed/

    House of Commons Library, 2022. It also mentions Sir Alec Douglas-Home.

    Conservative Party rules.
    https://public.conservatives.com/organisation-department/202101/Conservative Party Constitution as amended January 2021.pdf
  • Options
    EabhalEabhal Posts: 5,906
    Exceptionally poor taste betting on the King's cancer prognosis.
  • Options
    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,044
    On Cameron as PM:

    Why would he want to go back to be PM?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646
    Eabhal said:

    Exceptionally poor taste betting on the King's cancer prognosis.

    The grammar is worse: "..i are reporting.."
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646
    What chance of this surviving another Trump presidency ?

    White House touts trilateral cooperation with S. Korea, Japan as key feat in Indo-Pacific Strategy
    https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=368659
    ..
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,395
    Not on that, but I did put a quid on Theresa May as next PM at 500/1 on Betfair.

    At those sort of odds you don't really need much analysis but she's still an PM, has lots of experience, could do the job (Brexit is done) and is genuinely committed to the Conservatives.

    If it really does totally collapse for Sunak after the locals there are far worse choices and, who knows, she might have even learnt something from 2017.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,044

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Lord Cameron could, even while retaining his peerage, relinquish his right to sit in the Lords and then be elected as a Conservative MP and then be elected party leader (who must sit in the House of Commons) and thus Prime Minister. That might be worth 100/1 since a safe seat can be arranged.

    But the scheme discussed in the header for a PM in the House of Lords which even in 1940 was unacceptable, is far more than a 100/1 shot.


    Are there any safe seats?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,395
    Marcus Rashford to become *a UK MP* by 2060 at 33/1 looks good to me.

    That's for any party, in any form, over the next 36 years.

    Given he's actually interested in politics there are worse bets and I could see that coming true once his football career is over.
  • Options

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873
    Labour's disciplinary process laid bare.

    Factionalism drives everything rather than a proper process.

    Labour has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing in Rochdale as the Candidate was a Starmerite.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Labour's disciplinary process laid bare.

    Factionalism drives everything rather than a proper process.

    Labour has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing in Rochdale as the Candidate was a Starmerite.

    Or should I say an SKS fan
  • Options

    Labour's disciplinary process laid bare.

    Factionalism drives everything rather than a proper process.

    Labour has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing in Rochdale as the Candidate was a Starmerite.

    Surely that was Paul Waugh?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646
    The GOP is now a family business.
    Aka Trump Org.

    Trump endorses new RNC chair and Lara Trump as co-chair
    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/12/trump-republican-national-committee-chair-whatley-00141061
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Labour's disciplinary process laid bare.

    Factionalism drives everything rather than a proper process.

    Labour has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing in Rochdale as the Candidate was a Starmerite.

    Surely that was Paul Waugh?
    Well there were 3 on the shortlist all deemed suitable with the values of the Party and all SKS fans.

    Paul Waugh was asked to stand despite not qualifying under the rulebook as he wasn't a Labour member.

    The process if purely factional and top-down and lacks any pretence of being what it should be ie selecting on merit.
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,423

    Labour's disciplinary process laid bare.

    Factionalism drives everything rather than a proper process.

    Labour has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing in Rochdale as the Candidate was a Starmerite.

    Or should I say an SKS fan
    Who backed Corbyn in 2016.
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,423

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Labour's disciplinary process laid bare.

    Factionalism drives everything rather than a proper process.

    Labour has had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing in Rochdale as the Candidate was a Starmerite.

    Or should I say an SKS fan
    Who backed Corbyn in 2016.
    Did he?

    He has been a right winger for as long as I can remember look at his record in Lancashire Labour.

    Perhaps he believed austerity was the wrong way forward and only one of the 4 Candidates was arguing that in 2016
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,423
    Welcome to Hyperbole City Arizona 🫠

    Sunak was facing a tough week - it has now turned into Christmas, Easter and his birthday all at once!

    https://news.sky.com/story/this-is-sir-keir-starmers-biggest-crisis-as-labour-leader-and-there-may-be-worse-to-come-13070386

    Laugh out loud hyperbole includes:

    “Suddenly, the Rochdale disaster - 17 days before polling day in that by-election - plunges the two by-elections this week, in Wellingborough and Kingswood, into potential disarray.”

    “This is far worse for Sir Keir and Labour than the "Red wall" Hartlepool by-election defeat in 2021 and the ULEZ backlash that handed victory to the Tories in Boris Johnson's Uxbridge and South Ruislip constituency in July.”

    “Labour's lead in the opinion polls has remained stubbornly around the 20% mark for months. That could now change. Will we see the beginning of the end of Labour's seemingly unassailable poll lead?
    Is this a turning point for the Tories? Possibly.“

    This is quickly following on from the hyperbole over Labours strong and sensible decision to retreat from an old and now unaffordable £140B spending commitment that wouldn’t have survived first contact with a pre budget OBR and possibly city markets too (aside from being so poorly itemised and defined for last two years it was becoming absolute gift to Sunak) - the media is surely driven not just by an election coming, but that one party is twenty points clear, so anything at all is now being elevated to “game changing” status, with these funny results like the Sky News analysis.

    I ask you to compare Starmer’s “week from Hell” with a Primeminster about to lose two seats in by elections, face more internal party derision, and see the economy, often the flagship of government re-election campaigning, enter technical recession.

    I post this on basis this sort of warped media frenzy doesn’t help or guide Political Betting at all, does it? You can even second guess the daft thing media commentators will do next in this mood - ignore what last 100 polls saying as well as all the other polls around the rogue poll, and big up the rogue poll as the game changing moment. 😏
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873
    BTW Ali was a Parliamentary Candidate under EICIPM in 2915 and Corbyn in 2019 but not 2017 all in Pendle
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    Daily Mail published a recording last night, allegedly of Mr Ali, blaming "people in the media from certain Jewish quarters" for the suspension of Andy McDonald from the Labour Party.

    McDonald was suspended after saying: "We will not rest until we have justice. Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty."

    The person on the recording goes on to say Israel planned to "get rid of [Palestinians] from Gaza" and "grab" the land.

    He also appears to boast about preventing Israeli flags being flown from local public buildings after the deadly attack by Hamas gunmen on 7 October.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Boring!

    I thought this thread was proposing an innovative solution to the US political situation
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998
    Jonathan said:

    Boring!

    I thought this thread was proposing an innovative solution to the US political situation

    But Trump does see his election as the return of the King...
  • Options
    OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,122

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
  • Options
    JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,013

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    Why is an opinion that Israel wishes to ethnically cleanse Gaza, unacceptable?

    I don't think it's correct. If it is, they'd have killed more Gazans by now, but I don't see how it can be considered antisemitic
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    Yes


    "We will not rest until we have justice. Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty."

    Is antisemitic these days in SKS land
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,318
    Jonathan said:

    Boring!

    I thought this thread was proposing an innovative solution to the US political situation

    Yep I was expecting the name Barack Obama to feature. Is that even legal/constitutional.

    And no not for him to become UK PM...
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,395
    OK, I'm going to say it: I find the whole Israel/Gaza/Palestine thing deeply deeply boring and I'm not sure I care.

    Next.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,873
    Quite proud of my post on Feb 10th I placed a bet at 4/1 at the time

    Lab good value at 6/4 now so time for me to go green on that too.

    Peter_the_Punter said:
    » show previous quotes
    There's not much liquidity in the market, so you have to look at last price matched. On Betfair that was 5.3 or about 9/2. I'm surprised it's that short though.

    Lot of cat-lovers in Rochdale?

    BigJohnOwls said:
    Labour likely to suspend their candidate lump on Galloway
  • Options
    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/
  • Options
    OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,122

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
  • Options
    CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 222

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
  • Options

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
    He's an editor at the lefty New Statesman.

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1721114343071170769
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.

    Why are you afraid?

    "Up the workers" will be a welcome change from the "right up the workers" mentality of the posh Brexiteer twats in government the last few years.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    Or as it is also known, the Golden Age of post Brexit vote Tory Government...
  • Options

    Quite proud of my post on Feb 10th I placed a bet at 4/1 at the time

    Lab good value at 6/4 now so time for me to go green on that too.

    Peter_the_Punter said:
    » show previous quotes
    There's not much liquidity in the market, so you have to look at last price matched. On Betfair that was 5.3 or about 9/2. I'm surprised it's that short though.

    Lot of cat-lovers in Rochdale?

    BigJohnOwls said:
    Labour likely to suspend their candidate lump on Galloway

    I did hat-tip you about this subsequently, John, when the price came in to the 5/2 you mentioned, about 48 hours later. Perhaps you missed it.

  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    While it would be untrue to say that "Israel wants" to ethnically cleanse Gaza, there is undeniably a movement for that, which has support in the more extreme elements of Netanyahu's coalition.

    Netenyau himself is as much opportunist as ideologue, so it's hard to be sure exactly what is his position.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/prominent-settler-pushes-pm-benjamin-netanyahu-rebuild-israeli-homes-gaza/
    ...Still, Dagan is not a total outlier. Some in Israel’s defense establishment are also lobbying for a permanent change in Gaza. In mid-October, the Misgav Institute for National Security and Zionist Strategy, an Israeli think tank founded by former security officials, urged Netanyahu to seize the “unique and rare opportunity to evacuate the whole Gaza Strip”.
    That’s been echoed by the Israeli Intelligence Ministry, a think tank within the government, which has recommended Gazans be relocated to Egypt’s northern Sinai..

    ...Remarks from members of Netanyahu’s government – though not from any ministers in the emergency war cabinet – are only fueling fears.
    This week Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter, a former head of the Shin Bet intelligence service, said on television: “We are now rolling out the Gaza nakba.”
  • Options
    Scott_xP said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.

    Why are you afraid?

    "Up the workers" will be a welcome change from the "right up the workers" mentality of the posh Brexiteer twats in government the last few years.
    Class warfare, like Brexit, always ends in failure.

    Which reminds me, Goldman Sachs, top firm, never doubted them.

    Brexit delivered 5% blow to UK economy, says Goldman Sachs

    Britain has “significantly underperformed” compared with the European Union and the United States since the vote to leave in June 2016, the bank claims


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cost-of-brexit-is-a-5-percent-knock-to-uk-economy-says-goldman-sachs-pwwqwhfwc
  • Options

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
    Testify.
  • Options

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998
    @alexmassie

    Weird to see the prime minister arguing for a Labour government but few things should surprise us anymore.


  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646
    TOPPING said:

    Jonathan said:

    Boring!

    I thought this thread was proposing an innovative solution to the US political situation

    Yep I was expecting the name Barack Obama to feature. Is that even legal/constitutional.

    And no not for him to become UK PM...
    As was noted upthread, it's Trump rather than Obama who seems attracted to monarchical powers.
  • Options
    TimSTimS Posts: 9,650

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
    According to the likes of Lee Anderson, Jonathan Gullis or Darren Grimes the working class are in power already and the problem is, quote, the chai latte drinking, avocado toast munching middle classes and tofu eating wokerati who don’t understand the will of the people.

    We’ve had the mythical white working class salt of the earth red wall voter shoved in our faces since 2016. But now the Tories look fearfully at the blue wall and decide to change their minds about all that.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,831

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    I'm not entirely sure that a working-class Labour cabinet will be electorally unattractive. 😃
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,758

    Scott_xP said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.

    Why are you afraid?

    "Up the workers" will be a welcome change from the "right up the workers" mentality of the posh Brexiteer twats in government the last few years.
    Class warfare, like Brexit, always ends in failure.

    Which reminds me, Goldman Sachs, top firm, never doubted them.

    Brexit delivered 5% blow to UK economy, says Goldman Sachs

    Britain has “significantly underperformed” compared with the European Union and the United States since the vote to leave in June 2016, the bank claims


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cost-of-brexit-is-a-5-percent-knock-to-uk-economy-says-goldman-sachs-pwwqwhfwc
    LOL, shows why Cameron should never be let near the levers of power
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,298

    OK, I'm going to say it: I find the whole Israel/Gaza/Palestine thing deeply deeply boring and I'm not sure I care.

    Next.

    A seventy-five year old conflict that blew its best plot lines in the first few decades?
  • Options
    CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 222

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    By the way I will add that the tories are the ones who have governed in such a way for class tensions to appear in the first place.... very aggressive economic policies. Let me give you an example. If you are born into poverty in the uk it will, on average, take your family 5 generations to make it up to median income...FIVE GENERATIONS. In Denmark, a country just 4p0km away across the north sea, that takes 2 generations. You can see that there are incentivisation issues in the uk and literal class issues when any effort on your part can only be felt by your far far far decendants 🤷 by the way the uk has the highest gini coefficient in Europe.... so yeah, class is a thing, and the numbers say there is a good reason for that. The uk used to be able to use its empire to address its internal pressures (export the poor and children, bring in extra resourses), but now we are an ordinary country we have to learn to live in social equilibrium... and the five gen problem won't be left unanswered.
  • Options
    TimS said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
    According to the likes of Lee Anderson, Jonathan Gullis or Darren Grimes the working class are in power already and the problem is, quote, the chai latte drinking, avocado toast munching middle classes and tofu eating wokerati who don’t understand the will of the people.

    We’ve had the mythical white working class salt of the earth red wall voter shoved in our faces since 2016. But now the Tories look fearfully at the blue wall and decide to change their minds about all that.
    Indeed, another pleb David Davis was Brexit Secretary, what a success he was.
  • Options
    TazTaz Posts: 11,193
    How convenient for Labour to get "new information" about their hapless Rochdale candidate which allows them to dump him and deflect questions about their judgement.

    Also how nice of a tame price to regurgitate that for them.

    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/labour-received-new-information-about-rochdale-by-election-candidate-before-withdrawing-support/ar-BB1iaZrz?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=48cf682047a84dd695af2bd8e5997ccd&ei=16
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,044

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998

    Class warfare, like Brexit, always ends in failure.

    Why is Richi pitching for votes of private school parents then?

    @mikeysmith

    When you say “my parents worked hard to give me a good education” you’re saying two things.

    • State education, which I am in charge of, is bad and should be avoided at all costs.
    • If you’re a parent who can’t afford to do that, you aren’t working hard enough for your kids.
  • Options

    Scott_xP said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.

    Why are you afraid?

    "Up the workers" will be a welcome change from the "right up the workers" mentality of the posh Brexiteer twats in government the last few years.
    Class warfare, like Brexit, always ends in failure.

    Which reminds me, Goldman Sachs, top firm, never doubted them.

    Brexit delivered 5% blow to UK economy, says Goldman Sachs

    Britain has “significantly underperformed” compared with the European Union and the United States since the vote to leave in June 2016, the bank claims


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cost-of-brexit-is-a-5-percent-knock-to-uk-economy-says-goldman-sachs-pwwqwhfwc
    What's weird is the denial of the issue.

    Even BoJo the Liar talked of a Nike swoosh; an transitional hit before everything went brilliantly.

    One out of one so far, but it's blooming hard to see where the second bit comes from.
  • Options

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    I think we just have to be very careful what we say on the subject, and to whom, because a lot of people are very touchy about it and desperate to portray their side as victims and the other side as monsters.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998
    @lizzzburden
    The jobs data also put the spotlight back on NHS waiting lists ahead of the UK election - economic inactivity due to long-term sickness is up again...
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,444

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    I think we just have to be very careful what we say on the subject, and to whom, because a lot of people are very touchy about it and desperate to portray their side as victims and the other side as monsters.
    It's essentially a Civil War.

    First Law of Civil Wars

    1) They aren't civil.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    I think we just have to be very careful what we say on the subject, and to whom, because a lot of people are very touchy about it and desperate to portray their side as victims and the other side as monsters.
    There are victims and monsters on both sides.
    It's only the relative proportions which are in dispute.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646
    “Any new mobilisation requires more coercion and violence. The Kremlin is afraid of people returning home from the front.”


    @polinaivanovva⁩ on how Russian army wives are demanding their men back – and the Kremlin doesn’t know what to do about them

    https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1757298038035431626
  • Options
    bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,661
    Rochdale… Clearly not good for Labour, but they have a huge majority. I think it likely Ali wins, as Neale Hanvey did in similar circumstances with almost no drop in vote share.

    People who were tempted to vote for Galloway aren’t going to be put off Ali by Ali’s comments. If anything, they will be more sympathetic towards him!

    Reform UK usually have a poor ground war, and have chosen a candidate with more problems than Ali. The Tories last won Rochdale in 1951 and their national polling is atrocious. The Green candidate has withdrawn from campaigning. The LibDems may be best placed to make a challenge, but they’ve only got a fortnight to do it in. It’s over a decade since they got a decent vote in the constituency.

    We’d expect a very low turnout simply given it’s a safe Opposition-held seat in a by-election. I suggest the turnout may be even lower, but Ali will win. I think the betting value is on Labour and I’d lay Galloway on current odds. You can still get good odds on the LibDems in places, I think, which may be worth it as a trading bet. DYOR.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,395

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
    The final paragraph is instructive, though, in that it seems to be gleefully anticipating a bit of class war.

    That's not healthy. If it does this then it might entrench division. I can't see anything that would promote a more rapid recovery of the Tories in their base than this. And that's almost regardless of who they select as LoTO:


    "The first working-class government in decades will speak that language. It will also be chippy. It will squeeze private schools and spray concrete newbuild homes all over the shires. It will go after companies who make the same mistakes as P&O. It may struggle to hide the pleasure it takes in doing so."
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,395

    OK, I'm going to say it: I find the whole Israel/Gaza/Palestine thing deeply deeply boring and I'm not sure I care.

    Next.

    A seventy-five year old conflict that blew its best plot lines in the first few decades?
    It's a bit season six of The Crown at the moment.

    Everyone else has now flipped over to AppleTV to watch Masters of the Air instead.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,311
    I have read the whole thread and there is no update on Simba. I am really confused.
  • Options

    TimS said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
    According to the likes of Lee Anderson, Jonathan Gullis or Darren Grimes the working class are in power already and the problem is, quote, the chai latte drinking, avocado toast munching middle classes and tofu eating wokerati who don’t understand the will of the people.

    We’ve had the mythical white working class salt of the earth red wall voter shoved in our faces since 2016. But now the Tories look fearfully at the blue wall and decide to change their minds about all that.
    Indeed, another pleb David Davis was Brexit Secretary, what a success he was.
    He certainly was compared to David 'paid the whole bill' Cameron.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998
    Nigelb said:

    I'm just surprised that TSE hasn't noticed Shrove Tuesday has creped up on us.

    That joke also fell flat on TwiX. Flat as a pancake...
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,395

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
    I agree, and I fear many in Labour would want to do the same as well.

    Let's be honest: none of us really knows what SKS is going to do. We're only going to find out after he's been elected and not everyone is going to like it.
  • Options
    So we've apparently been in a recession during which unemployment has fallen significantly, pay growth has been positive, the population has expanded and even the PMIs have been pretty good.

    Either we're in some weird new economic paradigm, there's a mixture of minor factors (reducing work hours among the well paid over 50s perhaps) or somewhere the data is wrong.
  • Options
    CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 222

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
    He's an editor at the lefty New Statesman.

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1721114343071170769
    I am not so worried about being labeled "leftie" by somebody with the handle "screaming eagles" 🤷
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,044

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
    I agree, and I fear many in Labour would want to do the same as well.

    Let's be honest: none of us really knows what SKS is going to do. We're only going to find out after he's been elected and not everyone is going to like it.
    He will disappoint some in his own party, and many outside his party. But that's the same for all new PMs.

    I'm not expecting him to be very good, to be honest. Probably at May's level of competence- reasonable, but uninspiring. Not what the country needs, but better than what we've got.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,296
    DavidL said:

    I have read the whole thread and there is no update on Simba. I am really confused.

    Not Simba, Aragorn!
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,998

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
    I agree, and I fear many in Labour would want to do the same as well.

    Let's be honest: none of us really knows what SKS is going to do. We're only going to find out after he's been elected and not everyone is going to like it.
    He will disappoint some in his own party, and many outside his party. But that's the same for all new PMs.

    I'm not expecting him to be very good, to be honest. Probably at May's level of competence- reasonable, but uninspiring. Not what the country needs, but better than what we've got.
    The sheer sense of relief will give him quite a long honeymoon I think
  • Options

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
    Though running the country on behalf of their own constituencies would have been better than on behalf of themselves and their cronies.

    In reality a combination of full employment, affordable housing, control of East European immigration and extra NHS spending has actually delivered for most of their new 2017-2019 constituencies.

    As Conservatives don't boast of this success I can only think its a happy accident.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,905

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    I think we just have to be very careful what we say on the subject, and to whom, because a lot of people are very touchy about it and desperate to portray their side as victims and the other side as monsters.
    It's essentially a Civil War.

    First Law of Civil Wars

    1) They aren't civil.
    This particular one has been going on for an entire lifetime, and there’s very little that anyone can say that hasn’t been said already.
  • Options
    OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,122

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Euch, working class people with political power, how awful.
    The final paragraph is instructive, though, in that it seems to be gleefully anticipating a bit of class war.

    That's not healthy. If it does this then it might entrench division. I can't see anything that would promote a more rapid recovery of the Tories in their base than this. And that's almost regardless of who they select as LoTO:


    "The first working-class government in decades will speak that language. It will also be chippy. It will squeeze private schools and spray concrete newbuild homes all over the shires. It will go after companies who make the same mistakes as P&O. It may struggle to hide the pleasure it takes in doing so."
    We've had plenty of class war from the other side too, I don't see why we should be the ones to go all kumbaya.
  • Options
    LeonLeon Posts: 47,292

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    Daily Mail published a recording last night, allegedly of Mr Ali, blaming "people in the media from certain Jewish quarters" for the suspension of Andy McDonald from the Labour Party.

    McDonald was suspended after saying: "We will not rest until we have justice. Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty."

    The person on the recording goes on to say Israel planned to "get rid of [Palestinians] from Gaza" and "grab" the land.

    He also appears to boast about preventing Israeli flags being flown from local public buildings after the deadly attack by Hamas gunmen on 7 October.
    The trouble for Labour is that these attitudes are shared right across the party, especially but not exclusively in Muslim MPs, activists, members. voters - along with the mad smelly Corbynites

    It is all there. Starmer has not purged it, not remotely. And it will all come bubbling out like some vile boiling effluent, even as Starmer tries to make us all shut up with new Woke laws on hate speech and Islamismphobia and specifically equal rights for midget trans ginger haired asylum seeking amputee terrorist mongers
  • Options

    So we've apparently been in a recession during which unemployment has fallen significantly, pay growth has been positive, the population has expanded and even the PMIs have been pretty good.

    Either we're in some weird new economic paradigm, there's a mixture of minor factors (reducing work hours among the well paid over 50s perhaps) or somewhere the data is wrong.

    Paper economy vs real economy.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,044

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
    Though running the country on behalf of their own constituencies would have been better than on behalf of themselves and their cronies.

    In reality a combination of full employment, affordable housing, control of East European immigration and extra NHS spending has actually delivered for most of their new 2017-2019 constituencies.

    As Conservatives don't boast of this success I can only think its a happy accident.
    I chose my wording poorly: by 'constituency' I meant 'themselves and their cronies', rather than their parliamentary constituency.
  • Options
    algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 10,550

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
    He's an editor at the lefty New Statesman.

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1721114343071170769
    The New Statesman feels very middling in recent times - perched in the general area of social liberalism, posh green and social democrat. A decent proportion of it is readable. I suspect that keeping an eye on it as Labour assume power and then spend a year or two dealing with reality will be quite informative.

    It is also much less self consciously pseudo intellectual than it sometimes has been. For that, and much further left, you have to go to the London Review of Books.
  • Options
    Nigelb said:

    I'm just surprised that TSE hasn't noticed Shrove Tuesday has creped up on us.

    My other half regularly tells me I am a useless tosser so I try and ignore Shrove Tuesday.
  • Options
    So does anyone have any thoughts about the special election to replace George Santos in New York ?
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,003
    Scott_xP said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    Because the posher governments of Johnson, Truss and Sunak have gone really brilliantly well...
    I don't care if poshos or plebs run the country: as long as they run it for everyone, not just their own constituency. This is where the Conservatives have gone very wrong.
    I agree, and I fear many in Labour would want to do the same as well.

    Let's be honest: none of us really knows what SKS is going to do. We're only going to find out after he's been elected and not everyone is going to like it.
    He will disappoint some in his own party, and many outside his party. But that's the same for all new PMs.

    I'm not expecting him to be very good, to be honest. Probably at May's level of competence- reasonable, but uninspiring. Not what the country needs, but better than what we've got.
    The sheer sense of relief will give him quite a long honeymoon I think
    Morning All!
    I’m normally a fairly optimistic sort of bloke, but the wretched Rochdale row suggests that any post-election ‘honeymoon’ will be quite short.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646

    Nigelb said:

    I'm just surprised that TSE hasn't noticed Shrove Tuesday has creped up on us.

    My other half regularly tells me I am a useless tosser so I try and ignore Shrove Tuesday.
    A must celebrate for a serial flipper like Keir, though.
  • Options
    OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,122
    algarkirk said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
    He's an editor at the lefty New Statesman.

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1721114343071170769
    The New Statesman feels very middling in recent times - perched in the general area of social liberalism, posh green and social democrat. A decent proportion of it is readable. I suspect that keeping an eye on it as Labour assume power and then spend a year or two dealing with reality will be quite informative.

    It is also much less self consciously pseudo intellectual than it sometimes has been. For that, and much further left, you have to go to the London Review of Books.
    I wouldn't describe the LRB as pseudo-intellectual. Or to put it another way, if the LRB isn't intellectual, what is?
  • Options

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
    He's an editor at the lefty New Statesman.

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1721114343071170769
    I am not so worried about being labeled "leftie" by somebody with the handle "screaming eagles" 🤷
    I have a weakness for cavalry charges, tank battles, and airborne operations, hence the name.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/101st_Airborne_Division

    I also love naval battles.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,646

    So does anyone have any thoughts about the special election to replace George Santos in New York ?

    The weather outside is frightful...
    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/12/forecast-worsens-on-eve-of-new-york-special-election-00141032
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,296
    edited February 13

    So does anyone have any thoughts about the special election to replace George Santos in New York ?

    It's a swing seat. It will be interesting to see who wins. The Republican candidate is an Israeli who is registered as a Democrat. The Democrat candidate is the former Rep.

    If the Democrats retake the seat it would suggest that they are not doing as badly among their core vote as one or two here have suggested.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,318
    Of course given that Galloway is a threat to Lab and is running afaics on a pro-palestinian ticket the fact that Lab's official candidate has all of a sudden been discovered to have made some anti-Jewish comments might safely deliver the seat to Lab.

    Trebles all round.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,296

    Nigelb said:

    I'm just surprised that TSE hasn't noticed Shrove Tuesday has creped up on us.

    My other half regularly tells me I am a useless tosser so I try and ignore Shrove Tuesday.
    I don't think she was panning you.
  • Options
    algarkirk said:

    This is why the Starmer government will be a disaster and makes me afraid.



    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/class-war-is-back-in-fashion-for-labour-gnzgk79hl

    I did warn you about this last year.

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2023/11/06/class-warfare/

    This is the times.... how likely are they to give a balancen representation? Source criticism required.
    He's an editor at the lefty New Statesman.

    Stats show Starmer will have the most plebeian cabinet since Theresa May.

    https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1721114343071170769
    The New Statesman feels very middling in recent times - perched in the general area of social liberalism, posh green and social democrat. A decent proportion of it is readable. I suspect that keeping an eye on it as Labour assume power and then spend a year or two dealing with reality will be quite informative.

    It is also much less self consciously pseudo intellectual than it sometimes has been. For that, and much further left, you have to go to the London Review of Books.
    The New Statesman peaked in 2007 with this article then it has been downhill ever since.

    We cannot be killed

    'Shortly there will be an election, in which Labour will increase its majority'


    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2007/09/labour-majority-increase
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,296
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    I'm just surprised that TSE hasn't noticed Shrove Tuesday has creped up on us.

    My other half regularly tells me I am a useless tosser so I try and ignore Shrove Tuesday.
    A must celebrate for a serial flipper like Keir, though.
    Ah well, when it comes to flippers, I'm sure @DougSeal can put the rest of us to shame.
  • Options
    Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,320
    edited February 13

    Good morning from Aberdeen airport. Could I please offer my congratulations to @NickPalmer ? His attempted smear of the Liberal Democrat’s over Cyril Smith in response to his own candidate being thrown out in disgrace was quality entertainment.

    It’s pretty clear in this by election. We have a choice of disgraced former Labour candidates - Ali, Galloway, Danczuk. We have a disgraced party - the Tories. Or we have the LibDems.

    We know that people want to Get The Tories Out. Happily in Rochdale they don’t have a chance. Plenty of people also seem to want to vote for foaming dog fever. If you want to stop both, vote LibDem.

    On this topic; ages ago I argued that Labour were going to get such a stonking majority, that they would be inundated with new, untested MPs. And therefore there might be more examples of (ahem) 'poor' MPs, such as the ex-member for Sheffield Hallam (and I don't mean Clegg...).

    It seems this is coming true much earlier than I expected. There's something rotten in the way Labour chooses candidates. The same might be true for the other parties, as well.
    I’ve been a candidate. I’ve interviewed candidates. I’ve discussed candidates with regional office staff. I cannot understand how they managed to miss this.

    Worst thing is that it would appear that at least some local party members had heard the comments - and voted for Ali anyway. Which means the CLP needs suspending. This wasn’t an HQ parachute candidate, the CLP actively chose him.
    What have they actually missed though. The only thing the mail on Sunday came up with are remarks the Israeli government allowed the Hamas attack so they could have the war they wanted - not the most blisteringly anti semitic of statements, unless you disagree?
    The latest remarks that have come to light are that he said Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

    Obviously Labour thinks that even saying that is unacceptable!
    I think we just have to accept that all criticism of Israel is a thought crime in Britain. If the Israelis want to kill another 12000 Gazan children who are we to question them?
    I think we just have to be very careful what we say on the subject, and to whom, because a lot of people are very touchy about it and desperate to portray their side as victims and the other side as monsters.
    Both sides have victims, and both sides have monsters. That's why it's so difficult to speak about without upsetting people.

    In comparison, the Ukraine war is exceedingly simple morally: Russia is in the wrong, and Ukraine is in the right.
    It's more than that with Ukraine, JJ.

    We have a dog in the fight. If Ukraine goes, where next? We stop Putin now, we save ourselves a lot of problems later. That is all very simple.

  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,101
    edited February 13

    So we've apparently been in a recession during which unemployment has fallen significantly, pay growth has been positive, the population has expanded and even the PMIs have been pretty good.

    Either we're in some weird new economic paradigm, there's a mixture of minor factors (reducing work hours among the well paid over 50s perhaps) or somewhere the data is wrong.

    Paper economy vs real economy.
    The real economy is great for lots of people.

    And bad for many others.

    I do wonder if economic mobility has declined.

    Which would be odd as there are so many job and training opportunities and thanks to the internet its much easier to improve your skillset now that in previous decades.

    Perhaps there's too many young workers trapped in some student debt, unaffordable housing economic stasis.
This discussion has been closed.