it is perfectly possible the Republican controlled House could try and impeach Biden, however given the Senate remains Democrat controlled it has no chance of leading to a conviction before the next presidential election
it is perfectly possible the Republican controlled House could try and impeach Biden, however given the Senate remains Democrat controlled it has no chance of leading to a conviction before the next presidential election
I think ‘control’ is a generous word for what Republicans have in the House…
I would guess "yes" on this given the terms of the deal. The attempt to "impeach" his son persists for no obvious reason, they attempted to impeach the Homeland Security Secretary for his failures at that Texas border (on pretty much the same day that they failed to pass their own bill which sought to address the problem), they resent the fact that their great leader was impeached twice and they are, quite simply, as mad as a box of frogs. Why on earth wouldn't they? Their track record indicates that they need no evidence, no logic, no reason. Its what they do.
it is perfectly possible the Republican controlled House could try and impeach Biden, however given the Senate remains Democrat controlled it has no chance of leading to a conviction before the next presidential election
I think ‘control’ is a generous word for what Republicans have in the House…
They couldn’t organise the impeachment of James in a Roald Dahl story.
it is perfectly possible the Republican controlled House could try and impeach Biden, however given the Senate remains Democrat controlled it has no chance of leading to a conviction before the next presidential election
I think ‘control’ is a generous word for what Republicans have in the House…
The US House at the moment, is somewhat reminiscent of the 2017 Parliament in the UK. Pretty much unable to agree on anything except postponing decisions, and in need of another election in short order.
However, one thing on which all the various Republican factions should be able to agree, is an impeachment of the president, so long as someone can find the correct form of words. In which case, the 6 is value. (Assuming the UK date format in the rules).
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
it is perfectly possible the Republican controlled House could try and impeach Biden, however given the Senate remains Democrat controlled it has no chance of leading to a conviction before the next presidential election
I think ‘control’ is a generous word for what Republicans have in the House…
The US House at the moment, is somewhat reminiscent of the 2017 Parliament in the UK. Pretty much unable to agree on anything except postponing decisions, and in need of another election in short order.
However, one thing on which all the various Republican factions should be able to agree, is an impeachment of the president, so long as someone can find the correct form of words. In which case, the 6 is value. (Assuming the UK date format in the rules).
Why?
To be impeached, you need to have committed a crime related to the office you hold.
Biden hasn’t even been accused of one.
They tried to impeach the Secretary of Homeland Security because reasons and several of their own reps rebelled on the grounds that actually, impeachment is a process not a political game.
They may also have learned from the Dem mistake about impeaching Trump prematurely. If they hadn’t gone for the first they would have had a slam dunk case even that cowardly cretin McConnell couldn’t have ducked on the second.
Is something afoot? I get the feeling there are elements within Labour that have decided the bland, cautious, managerial approach will get them chucked out of office after one term anyway. So therefore what's the point? Will Sir Keir be replaced with someone with vision and vim, with eye towards the future?
This guy on YouTube keeps making the complaint that figures of the right have been prosecuted and figures of the left have not.
Here’s the thing. Trump (as an example) gets taken to court because he breaks the law, not because he is alt right…
It’s unfair because he is a member of The Legally Challenged Community.
Sometime ago I met some “penal reformers” who wanted to replace “criminal” with LCC. Because criminal is pejorative, apparently.
Well, more that criminal identified then as having criminality as an inherent characteristic, perhaps.
Maybe, "Person With Temporary Legal Difficulties" would be better?
What's wrong with convict? It's accurate, and it's not value loaded - leaves open the question of innocence/unfair trials. Seeing as a convict has been convicted to undergo penal sanctions in the first place.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Austria is quite extraordinarily parasitic. A very wealthy nation - borderline smug - I’d say. The average Austrian has a much nicer welfare coddled life than the average American
Austria spends just 0.77% of GDP on defence, and its right in the firing line if Putin comes marching through Eastern Europe
Ireland is an unspeakable leech, of course. 0.23% and relying on the Brits who they constantly abuse
You can’t blame The Donald for being a bit irritable
it is perfectly possible the Republican controlled House could try and impeach Biden, however given the Senate remains Democrat controlled it has no chance of leading to a conviction before the next presidential election
I think ‘control’ is a generous word for what Republicans have in the House…
The US House at the moment, is somewhat reminiscent of the 2017 Parliament in the UK. Pretty much unable to agree on anything except postponing decisions, and in need of another election in short order.
However, one thing on which all the various Republican factions should be able to agree, is an impeachment of the president, so long as someone can find the correct form of words. In which case, the 6 is value. (Assuming the UK date format in the rules).
Why?
To be impeached, you need to have committed a crime related to the office you hold.
Biden hasn’t even been accused of one.
They tried to impeach the Secretary of Homeland Security because reasons and several of their own reps rebelled on the grounds that actually, impeachment is a process not a political game.
They may also have learned from the Dem mistake about impeaching Trump prematurely. If they hadn’t gone for the first they would have had a slam dunk case even that cowardly cretin McConnell couldn’t have ducked on the second.
To be fair, the impeachment of HS Sec Mayorkas is coming back next week, and will probably pass. He’s the person responsible for the row in Texas over illegal immigration, with the Feds apparently in favour of letting people cross the border.
Regarding Biden, I think that his own Cabinet need to have a good look at the 25th amendment. The report last week is really sad to read, he’s clearly not all there any more and needs to stand down. Many of us will have dealt with family members in similar situations.
This guy on YouTube keeps making the complaint that figures of the right have been prosecuted and figures of the left have not.
Here’s the thing. Trump (as an example) gets taken to court because he breaks the law, not because he is alt right…
It’s unfair because he is a member of The Legally Challenged Community.
Sometime ago I met some “penal reformers” who wanted to replace “criminal” with LCC. Because criminal is pejorative, apparently.
Well, more that criminal identified then as having criminality as an inherent characteristic, perhaps.
Maybe, "Person With Temporary Legal Difficulties" would be better?
What's wrong with convict? It's accurate, and it's not value loaded - leaves open the question of innocence/unfair trials. Seeing as a convict has been convicted to undergo penal sanctions in the first place.
It’s much harder to to turn “convict”‘into a power point slide deck, a charitable cause and whole bunch of nonsense?
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Nice clear post with video illustrations attached below.
Since the media refuses to report on it, let me share what happens at a typical Trump speech:
1. He comes out to the playing of the “January 6 Anthem” song which he recorded with some of the most dangerous J6 rioters in jail.
2. He brags how his song with the J6 rioters gets more downloads than Taylor Swift (it does not)
3. He spends a few minutes talking about passing cognitive exams, and how the audience would not pass the exam, but because he is really smart (he is not) he is able to ace the exam.
4. He praises Viktor Orban, the leader of Hungary, who Trump says is the most respected leader in Europe (he is not).
5. He praises President Xi and says he is very strong and rules over 1 billion people with an iron fist and Hollywood couldn’t find an actor as tough as President Xi.
6. He praises Putin and says people say it’s a bad thing he gets along with Putin but he thinks it’s a good thing.
7. He makes weird noises reenacting lifting weights with a trans woman and he says “mommy I can’t do it. Mommy. Ughhh, uhh, mommy help me.”
8. He says he doesn’t like seeing President Biden at the beach and says he has a better body than Biden (he does not)
9. He talks about his hatred of windmills and his hatred of electric cars. He says he would rather be electrocuted than eaten by sharks however.
10. He praises the J6 insurrectionists and calls them hostages.
11. He whines about his court cases, attacks prosecutors, judges, and witnesses, and then praises “the great Alphonse Capone” and brags he was indicted more than Capone.
12. He quotes Hitler and says immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country.
13. He says he wants to be a dictator on day 1.
14. He plays QAnon music, audience members often make QAnon sign with their hands, and he talks about how America is a failing nation.
Nice clear post with video illustrations attached below.
Since the media refuses to report on it, let me share what happens at a typical Trump speech:
1. He comes out to the playing of the “January 6 Anthem” song which he recorded with some of the most dangerous J6 rioters in jail.
2. He brags how his song with the J6 rioters gets more downloads than Taylor Swift (it does not)
3. He spends a few minutes talking about passing cognitive exams, and how the audience would not pass the exam, but because he is really smart (he is not) he is able to ace the exam.
4. He praises Viktor Orban, the leader of Hungary, who Trump says is the most respected leader in Europe (he is not).
5. He praises President Xi and says he is very strong and rules over 1 billion people with an iron fist and Hollywood couldn’t find an actor as tough as President Xi.
6. He praises Putin and says people say it’s a bad thing he gets along with Putin but he thinks it’s a good thing.
7. He makes weird noises reenacting lifting weights with a trans woman and he says “mommy I can’t do it. Mommy. Ughhh, uhh, mommy help me.”
8. He says he doesn’t like seeing President Biden at the beach and says he has a better body than Biden (he does not)
9. He talks about his hatred of windmills and his hatred of electric cars. He says he would rather be electrocuted than eaten by sharks however.
10. He praises the J6 insurrectionists and calls them hostages.
11. He whines about his court cases, attacks prosecutors, judges, and witnesses, and then praises “the great Alphonse Capone” and brags he was indicted more than Capone.
12. He quotes Hitler and says immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country.
13. He says he wants to be a dictator on day 1.
14. He plays QAnon music, audience members often make QAnon sign with their hands, and he talks about how America is a failing nation.
The flip side is that America might not like a much more pugilistic and independent Europe, with a defence spending matching its economic heft, and thus more autonomous
But I get the sense that is where we are going. And I’m sure - as I’ve said before - that Poland is gonna end up with nukes
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
This guy on YouTube keeps making the complaint that figures of the right have been prosecuted and figures of the left have not.
Here’s the thing. Trump (as an example) gets taken to court because he breaks the law, not because he is alt right…
It’s unfair because he is a member of The Legally Challenged Community.
Sometime ago I met some “penal reformers” who wanted to replace “criminal” with LCC. Because criminal is pejorative, apparently.
Well, more that criminal identified then as having criminality as an inherent characteristic, perhaps.
Maybe, "Person With Temporary Legal Difficulties" would be better?
What's wrong with convict? It's accurate, and it's not value loaded - leaves open the question of innocence/unfair trials. Seeing as a convict has been convicted to undergo penal sanctions in the first place.
It’s much harder to to turn “convict”‘into a power point slide deck, a charitable cause and whole bunch of nonsense?
That sounds like the San Francisco “unhoused outreach workers” who earn $250k but who don’t want to actually solve the problem because it makes their job redundant.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Can you be impeached for being dangerously senile ?
Biden hasn't reached that level yet.
But who knows next week or next month or in six months.
Setting impeachment aside the fact remains Biden's metal faculties are not going to improve as he ages, thy will get worse. I struggle to see what the Dems are trying to achieve with him as candidate.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
I’m really not a Trump fan, but he has a point that Europe has for too long relied on the US for its own defence, and needs to step up.
If European countries start buying more American weapons, then Trump will be all in favour of keeping NATO alive. He’s a zero-sum type of guy.
Yes, he absolutely has a point. The free ride for Europe is coming to an end
Er, the point is that Trump isn't merely complaining about funding contributions. He's actively forming a partnership with Putin to invade Europe.
No, he’s not. He’s doing his deal-making shtick. As @Sandpit correctly notes, if countries start spending 2% on defence - and buying some American kit to guarantee that nuclear umbrella - he’ll make the deal
But yes, if eu/nato countries refuse to pay for their own defence he will leave them to the mercy of Putin. And why shouldn’t he? Do we have an eternal right to American protection without paying for it? How would you feel about this as an American taxpayer with 2 weeks holiday a year and no welfare state, protecting wealthy Irish and Austrians retiring at 60?
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
I meant Switzerland instead of your choice of Slovenia.
Switzerland being the epitome of the tax dodging neutralist parasite.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Its an interesting question. America pushed its currency and its political ideology in a battle against communism. Trump is basically saying screw that, lets pull back into our own borders.
There is nothing that forces America to protect Ireland. It does so because it believes it is in its interest as they have a shared ideology. But if America changes its ideology then its no longer shared...
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
I’m really not a Trump fan, but he has a point that Europe has for too long relied on the US for its own defence, and needs to step up.
If European countries start buying more American weapons, then Trump will be all in favour of keeping NATO alive. He’s a zero-sum type of guy.
Yes, he absolutely has a point. The free ride for Europe is coming to an end
Er, the point is that Trump isn't merely complaining about funding contributions. He's actively forming a partnership with Putin to invade Europe.
Putin is currently in no position to invade anything else.
Currently.
He's heading in to his 70s and has just had his military hollowed out. He wont be in a position to do anything much but bully a few small nations in the Caucuses
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
I meant Switzerland instead of your choice of Slovenia.
Switzerland being the epitome of the tax dodging neutralist parasite.
How much use any of those contingents were I don't know.
The Swiss do take their own defence quite seriously tho. National service, lots of armed citizens, nuclear bunkers. You wouldn’t want to invade Switzerland- they’d give you a hard time
You could conquer Ireland in 7 minutes. They have one armoured car with a special blow up shamrock shaped penis mascot
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
The UK can’t “cease defending Ireland” because it’s a huge open back door to the UK if someone wanted to attack (not likely of course) and Ireland know it and so know they don’t have to spend a cent but can still be smug about how peaceful they are which is somewhat easier if you don’t have to make any effort to defend yourself.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Its an interesting question. America pushed its currency and its political ideology in a battle against communism. Trump is basically saying screw that, lets pull back into our own borders.
There is nothing that forces America to protect Ireland. It does so because it believes it is in its interest as they have a shared ideology. But if America changes its ideology then its no longer shared...
Yes. In a way he’s a classic American isolationist
And it makes sense. No one can threaten America in America, and if America loses interest in policing the world - as they seem to be, and who can blame them - where the fuck is China in the Red Sea? - then the rest of us will have to pony up
America will lose status but perhaps they don’t care
Years back I did a project for the Foreign Office - there is nothing more fun then trying to schedule a meeting between 3 countries that crosses the date line and features India...
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
The UK can’t “cease defending Ireland” because it’s a huge open back door to the UK if someone wanted to attack (not likely of course) and Ireland know it and so know they don’t have to spend a cent but can still be smug about how peaceful they are which is somewhat easier if you don’t have to make any effort to defend yourself.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
I meant Switzerland instead of your choice of Slovenia.
Switzerland being the epitome of the tax dodging neutralist parasite.
How much use any of those contingents were I don't know.
The Swiss do take their own defence quite seriously tho. National service, lots of armed citizens, nuclear bunkers. You wouldn’t want to invade Switzerland- they’d give you a hard time
You could conquer Ireland in 7 minutes. They have one armoured car with a special blow up shamrock shaped penis mascot
Edit - he also got the day of the week wrong, although to be fair other Presidential nominees have done that including JFK.
We could do with some clarity. Nearly every person their age forgets names and calls people by the wrong ones, it is separate from senility. Trump has always been a bit bonkers, so in his case continued bonkers behaviour doesn't really demonstrate senility either.
They may or may not both be senile, Trump is definitely mad, neither has good name recall.
I know I still use the identity of the Co-op movement as my ID on here, but my former home town really is being offered a basket of turds in this byelection.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
I meant Switzerland instead of your choice of Slovenia.
Switzerland being the epitome of the tax dodging neutralist parasite.
How much use any of those contingents were I don't know.
The Swiss do take their own defence quite seriously tho. National service, lots of armed citizens, nuclear bunkers. You wouldn’t want to invade Switzerland- they’d give you a hard time
You could conquer Ireland in 7 minutes. They have one armoured car with a special blow up shamrock shaped penis mascot
Don't give Braverman ideas...
Also, if you invade Switzerland on a Sunday, you’d be breaking all the anti-noise laws.
And the Swiss are fanatical about them. They’ve probably got a specially silently, specially vicious anti-tank weapon for that.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Its an interesting question. America pushed its currency and its political ideology in a battle against communism. Trump is basically saying screw that, lets pull back into our own borders.
There is nothing that forces America to protect Ireland. It does so because it believes it is in its interest as they have a shared ideology. But if America changes its ideology then its no longer shared...
Yes. In a way he’s a classic American isolationist
And it makes sense. No one can threaten America in America, and if America loses interest in policing the world - as they seem to be, and who can blame them - where the fuck is China in the Red Sea? - then the rest of us will have to pony up
America will lose status but perhaps they don’t care
I'd see it a little differently. He's been going on about allies not paying their way for 40 years. He's proud that he 'beat' a lot of people in business. This is just him saying that the US's allies have been beating them in the business of politics.
I know I still use the identity of the Co-op movement as my ID on here, but my former home town really is being offered a basket of turds in this byelection.
I know I still use the identity of the Co-op movement as my ID on here, but my former home town really is being offered a basket of turds in this byelection.
Bit harsh, surely?
I mean, you've got three candidates two of whom have made stupid remarks about Israel/the Jews and one of whom is an actual more or less card-carrying Nazi.
A basket of turds* would be far superior.
*Not necessarily the case for what autocorrect tried to make that, which was 'a basket of Truss.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
The UK can’t “cease defending Ireland” because it’s a huge open back door to the UK if someone wanted to attack (not likely of course) and Ireland know it and so know they don’t have to spend a cent but can still be smug about how peaceful they are which is somewhat easier if you don’t have to make any effort to defend yourself.
We should just demand they pay. Like Trump
And if they don’t get a bit punchy
You would have to wait until Biden isn’t President as they would go crying to him about the nasty English and he would be confused and think he is Irish and not actually American and declare war on us.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
I meant Switzerland instead of your choice of Slovenia.
Switzerland being the epitome of the tax dodging neutralist parasite.
How much use any of those contingents were I don't know.
The Swiss do take their own defence quite seriously tho. National service, lots of armed citizens, nuclear bunkers. You wouldn’t want to invade Switzerland- they’d give you a hard time
You could conquer Ireland in 7 minutes. They have one armoured car with a special blow up shamrock shaped penis mascot
King charles looking very frail now on first public appearance since cancer diagnosis.
Dark.
Harper is not wrong tho. KCIII does look suddenly very frail. Feck. Another coronation on the way?!
They will need to reincorporate Harry at this rate
If Charles has started chemo he'll be feeling like shit and there's worse to come. But it doesn't preclude a complete recovery to normal health. Eventually.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
The UK can’t “cease defending Ireland” because it’s a huge open back door to the UK if someone wanted to attack (not likely of course) and Ireland know it and so know they don’t have to spend a cent but can still be smug about how peaceful they are which is somewhat easier if you don’t have to make any effort to defend yourself.
We should just demand they pay. Like Trump
And if they don’t get a bit punchy
You would have to wait until Biden isn’t President as they would go crying to him about the nasty English and he would be confused and think he is Irish and not actually American and declare war on us.
We should demand an island off the west coast of Ireland as a sovereign UK base if they want continued UK protection
King charles looking very frail now on first public appearance since cancer diagnosis.
Dark.
Harper is not wrong tho. KCIII does look suddenly very frail. Feck. Another coronation on the way?!
They will need to reincorporate Harry at this rate
If Charles has started chemo he'll be feeling like shit and there's worse to come. But it doesn't preclude a complete recovery to normal health. Eventually.
I didn’t know that. He’s definitely on chemo?
Respect to him for even getting out of bed, in that case
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
The UK can’t “cease defending Ireland” because it’s a huge open back door to the UK if someone wanted to attack (not likely of course) and Ireland know it and so know they don’t have to spend a cent but can still be smug about how peaceful they are which is somewhat easier if you don’t have to make any effort to defend yourself.
We should just demand they pay. Like Trump
And if they don’t get a bit punchy
You would have to wait until Biden isn’t President as they would go crying to him about the nasty English and he would be confused and think he is Irish and not actually American and declare war on us.
We should demand an island off the west coast of Ireland as a sovereign UK base if they want continued UK protection
Fab women's q&a session with Labour's @lisanandy, MP and Rochdale's brilliant candidate @CllrAzharAli It was great to hear Labour's plans for Govt and how places like Rochdale, forgotten by the fictitious Tory levelling up,will be prioritised for growth. #GeneralElectionNow
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
I’m really not a Trump fan, but he has a point that Europe has for too long relied on the US for its own defence, and needs to step up.
If European countries start buying more American weapons, then Trump will be all in favour of keeping NATO alive. He’s a zero-sum type of guy.
Yes, he absolutely has a point. The free ride for Europe is coming to an end
Er, the point is that Trump isn't merely complaining about funding contributions. He's actively forming a partnership with Putin to invade Europe.
Putin is currently in no position to invade anything else.
Currently.
He's heading in to his 70s and has just had his military hollowed out. He wont be in a position to do anything much but bully a few small nations in the Caucuses
Russia had transitioned to a war economy. But it is also facing a demographic cliff edge which could put an end to Putin's geopolitical ambitions if he doesnt crack on. The window will close. He's an oldish man in a hurry.
'Donald Trump said on Saturday that as president, he warned Nato allies that he “would encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that are “delinquent” as he ramped up his attacks on foreign aid and longstanding international alliances.'
Trump being re-elected is the end of NATO. Why would anyone want to be reliant on this man?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
He also has a point. Why on earth should Americans continue to spend blood and treasure defending nations who are easily able to afford a lot more money on defence, but prefer to spend it on early retirement and welfare states that Americans do not get
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
Don't you mean Switzerland ?
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
The UK can’t “cease defending Ireland” because it’s a huge open back door to the UK if someone wanted to attack (not likely of course) and Ireland know it and so know they don’t have to spend a cent but can still be smug about how peaceful they are which is somewhat easier if you don’t have to make any effort to defend yourself.
We should just demand they pay. Like Trump
And if they don’t get a bit punchy
You would have to wait until Biden isn’t President as they would go crying to him about the nasty English and he would be confused and think he is Irish and not actually American and declare war on us.
We should demand an island off the west coast of Ireland as a sovereign UK base if they want continued UK protection
Craggy Island will never accept British rule.
Though perhaps you could replace Father Jack as Governor General?
Fab women's q&a session with Labour's @lisanandy, MP and Rochdale's brilliant candidate @CllrAzharAli It was great to hear Labour's plans for Govt and how places like Rochdale, forgotten by the fictitious Tory levelling up,will be prioritised for growth. #GeneralElectionNow
Comments
Edit: This is, of course, why all dates should be in ISO format. 2024-11-05. Easy-peasy.
Remember, Remember
Gunpowder, treason and plot…
Very apt unless Trump is jailed or tossed so isn’t running.
However, one thing on which all the various Republican factions should be able to agree, is an impeachment of the president, so long as someone can find the correct form of words. In which case, the 6 is value. (Assuming the UK date format in the rules).
Here’s the thing. Trump (as an example) gets taken to court because he breaks the law, not because he is alt right…
This builds on previous statements from him he would only defend NATO nations spending at least 2% of their gdp on defence
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/02/11/donald-trump-russia-nato-allies/
Can you get odds on that? Him keeling over? He looks so b ok ok I won’t go there
Why is that?
You could argue, of course, that this is not necessarily a bad thing and that NATO is well past its sell by date. But it would be the end.
Sometime ago I met some “penal reformers” who wanted to replace “criminal” with LCC. Because criminal is pejorative, apparently.
There must be more interesting bets tho, coz if you think about it, whatever happens in 2024 something mad is gonna happen
1. The Americans reelect Biden, a man who is now clearly demented and can’t tell Egypt from Arkansas
2. The Americans reelect Donald trump, ffs
3. The Americans elect Kamala hahahaha no give over
4. The Americans elect someone else? Who? How??
Looking at it that way, which option is the LEAST ridiculous, I am drawn to the idea of Kamala Harris
To be impeached, you need to have committed a crime related to the office you hold.
Biden hasn’t even been accused of one.
They tried to impeach the Secretary of Homeland Security because reasons and several of their own reps rebelled on the grounds that actually, impeachment is a process not a political game.
They may also have learned from the Dem mistake about impeaching Trump prematurely. If they hadn’t gone for the first they would have had a slam dunk case even that cowardly cretin McConnell couldn’t have ducked on the second.
Maybe, "Person With Temporary Legal Difficulties" would be better?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/feb/11/scuttling-his-flagship-green-policy-sir-keir-starmer-has-imperilled-his-credibility
Is something afoot? I get the feeling there are elements within Labour that have decided the bland, cautious, managerial approach will get them chucked out of office after one term anyway. So therefore what's the point? Will Sir Keir be replaced with someone with vision and vim, with eye towards the future?
Looking at you, Ireland, Austria and Slovenia
If European countries start buying more American weapons, then Trump will be all in favour of keeping NATO alive. He’s a zero-sum type of guy.
Think Habitual Criminal.
He owes everything he has retained this millennium, either directly or indirectly (via Deutsche Bank and others) to the Russian state.
Austria spends just 0.77% of GDP on defence, and its right in the firing line if Putin comes marching through Eastern Europe
Ireland is an unspeakable leech, of course. 0.23% and relying on the Brits who they constantly abuse
You can’t blame The Donald for being a bit irritable
Regarding Biden, I think that his own Cabinet need to have a good look at the 25th amendment. The report last week is really sad to read, he’s clearly not all there any more and needs to stand down. Many of us will have dealt with family members in similar situations.
Since the media refuses to report on it, let me share what happens at a typical Trump speech:
1. He comes out to the playing of the “January 6 Anthem” song which he recorded with some of the most dangerous J6 rioters in jail.
2. He brags how his song with the J6 rioters gets more downloads than Taylor Swift (it does not)
3. He spends a few minutes talking about passing cognitive exams, and how the audience would not pass the exam, but because he is really smart (he is not) he is able to ace the exam.
4. He praises Viktor Orban, the leader of Hungary, who Trump says is the most respected leader in Europe (he is not).
5. He praises President Xi and says he is very strong and rules over 1 billion people with an iron fist and Hollywood couldn’t find an actor as tough as President Xi.
6. He praises Putin and says people say it’s a bad thing he gets along with Putin but he thinks it’s a good thing.
7. He makes weird noises reenacting lifting weights with a trans woman and he says “mommy I can’t do it. Mommy. Ughhh, uhh, mommy help me.”
8. He says he doesn’t like seeing President Biden at the beach and says he has a better body than Biden (he does not)
9. He talks about his hatred of windmills and his hatred of electric cars. He says he would rather be electrocuted than eaten by sharks however.
10. He praises the J6 insurrectionists and calls them hostages.
11. He whines about his court cases, attacks prosecutors, judges, and witnesses, and then praises “the great Alphonse Capone” and brags he was indicted more than Capone.
12. He quotes Hitler and says immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country.
13. He says he wants to be a dictator on day 1.
14. He plays QAnon music, audience members often make QAnon sign with their hands, and he talks about how America is a failing nation.
15. He does a weird dance and leaves.
https://twitter.com/meiselasb/status/1756162844431937593
For date time parsing Lower case mm is minutes, upper case mm is months.
But I get the sense that is where we are going. And I’m sure - as I’ve said before - that Poland is gonna end up with nukes
While there's no doubt that the USA has spent treasure I'm not sure what blood it has spent defending Europe in recent decades.
On the other hand there's been a fair bit of European treasure and blood spent in supporting the USA in its wars.
Including over 600 British lives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
0.77%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_in_Europe_by_military_expenditures
How many European countries have got actively and expensively involved in American wars? Britain. Er, occasionally Germany or France. Ummm, anyone else? The Dutch with their brilliant peacekeeping in Bosnia? That wasn’t even an American war yet we relied on them
The UK should cease defending Ireland until they start paying for it
Biden hasn't reached that level yet.
But who knows next week or next month or in six months.
Until Xi Jinping turned up in the city, and all of a sudden the tent cities disappeared overnight.
https://www.ocregister.com/2023/11/20/it-shouldnt-take-the-arrival-of-xi-jinping-to-clear-the-streets-of-san-francisco/
But yes, if eu/nato countries refuse to pay for their own defence he will leave them to the mercy of Putin. And why shouldn’t he? Do we have an eternal right to American protection without paying for it? How would you feel about this as an American taxpayer with 2 weeks holiday a year and no welfare state, protecting wealthy Irish and Austrians retiring at 60?
Switzerland being the epitome of the tax dodging neutralist parasite.
As to involvement in American wars:
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/sep/21/afghanistan-troop-numbers-nato-data
How much use any of those contingents were I don't know.
There is nothing that forces America to protect Ireland. It does so because it believes it is in its interest as they have a shared ideology. But if America changes its ideology then its no longer shared...
https://gist.github.com/timvisee/fcda9bbdff88d45cc9061606b4b923ca#file-falsehoods-programming-time-list-md
You could conquer Ireland in 7 minutes. They have one armoured car with a special blow up shamrock shaped penis mascot
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1756164250827948384
Matt is not, yet, a convicted felon.
And it makes sense. No one can threaten America in America, and if America loses interest in policing the world - as they seem to be, and who can blame them - where the fuck is China in the Red Sea? - then the rest of us will have to pony up
America will lose status but perhaps they don’t care
Lisa Nandy has been campaigning in the constituency all morning.
More:
https://x.com/realbenbloch/status/1756672697176633645?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
https://x.com/richardmarcj/status/1756630445955957248?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
And if they don’t get a bit punchy
Edit - he also got the day of the week wrong, although to be fair other Presidential nominees have done that including JFK.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/02/11/joe-biden-age-legitimate-issue-says-hillary-clinton/
Hilary is 76
They may or may not both be senile, Trump is definitely mad, neither has good name recall.
And the Swiss are fanatical about them. They’ve probably got a specially silently, specially vicious anti-tank weapon for that.
I mean, you've got three candidates two of whom have made stupid remarks about Israel/the Jews and one of whom is an actual more or less card-carrying Nazi.
A basket of turds* would be far superior.
*Not necessarily the case for what autocorrect tried to make that, which was 'a basket of Truss.'
As I said this does feel like a co-ordinated elite Democrat attempt to dislodge Biden
First the NYT, now Hillary
https://www.swansea.ac.uk/law/
I despise hypocrisy.
Except when it's me doing it, of course.
They will need to reincorporate Harry at this rate
Respect to him for even getting out of bed, in that case
GSTK
From this morning
Fab women's q&a session with Labour's @lisanandy, MP and Rochdale's brilliant candidate @CllrAzharAli
It was great to hear Labour's plans for Govt and how places like Rochdale, forgotten by the fictitious Tory levelling up,will be prioritised for growth.
#GeneralElectionNow
https://x.com/bev_place/status/1756668858188902663?s=46&t=CW4pL-mMpTqsJXCdjW0Z6Q
Though perhaps you could replace Father Jack as Governor General?
The fighting must stop now. We need a sustainable ceasefire.
https://twitter.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1756673953970507804?t=sqq1zyR87fAU45fDjrfZcA&s=19
Does this mean that Starmer now has to demand his own resignation?