Are the SNP too wee, too poor, too stupid to fight an election? – politicalbetting.com
Electoral Commission figures show the SNP took £4,000 in donations in the first quarter of 2023. Both Scottish Labour and the Scottish Lib Dems registered more than £200,000. https://t.co/cqrRVK2F2o
Ban them from putting the Union Jack on their flag.
Isn’t it more insulting for them that their head of State is British and they have our flag on our flag. Nice reminder to them that they aren’t a real country.
F1 on the TV, Cricket on the laptop, the iPad switching between here & a motorsport forum, and the phone for the F1 live timing. Should be a fun next couple of hours!
F1 on the TV, Cricket on the laptop, the iPad switching between here & a motorsport forum, and the phone for the F1 live timing. Should be a fun next couple of hours!
Suella Braverman’s rhetoric about child sexual abuse and grooming gangs has cost her the support of an influential Conservative backer, Steve Baker, in a sign her hardline approach to culture war issues could hamper her chances of becoming Tory leader.
Baker, a Tory MP on the Brexiter right of the party, who is now a Northern Ireland minister, was Braverman’s de facto campaign manager when she stood to succeed Boris Johnson as Conservative leader and prime minister last summer.
While Braverman, now the home secretary, was eliminated in the second round of MPs’ voting, her candidacy was seen as a marker for a possible future contest, one likely if the Conservatives lose the next general election.
However, it is understood Baker has decided he would not back Braverman again because of serious concerns over the way she has approached the issue of so-called grooming gangs.
No they are not, but the low level of donations does seem remarkable to me - with so many Indy backers even with some being a bit annoyed with the SNP at present it seems strange.
True but before play this morning I thought it would be a damp squib and over before lunch but even if we lose it’s been a blinder and sets it up nicely for the rest of a series more than if we had just failed meekly this morning.
If Australia win by 15 runs or less it'll arguably be because of Lyon's decision to bat with a serious injury.
Where as England lost the first test by doing the opposite. I still can't work out the thinking, if they wanted to hurry the game along, why they didn't just say play T20 cricket, just swipe at everything, try and get 30-40-50 in a few overs.
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
If Australia win by 15 runs or less it'll arguably be because of Lyon's decision to bat with a serious injury.
Where as England lost the first test by doing the opposite. I still can't work out the thinking, if they wanted to hurry the game along, why they didn't just say play T20 cricket, just swipe at everything, try and get 30-40-50 in a few overs.
They wanted a few overs at them before the close of play. If they had picked up a couple everyone would have said how clever.
No they are not, but the low level of donations does seem remarkable to me - with so many Indy backers even with some being a bit annoyed with the SNP at present it seems strange.
Would you hand over cash to that bunch of grifters, £660K missing , accounts a disaster with no idea how much money they received or where it went etc. People have finally understood they are at it, their goose is cooked.
If Australia win by 15 runs or less it'll arguably be because of Lyon's decision to bat with a serious injury.
Where as England lost the first test by doing the opposite. I still can't work out the thinking, if they wanted to hurry the game along, why they didn't just say play T20 cricket, just swipe at everything, try and get 30-40-50 in a few overs.
They wanted a few overs at them before the close of play. If they had picked up a couple everyone would have said how clever.
I understand that. But I think they got quite a few overs. I don't think another 3 overs of T20 would have made much difference on getting overs during that tricky period.
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
You can find information about donations online. Looks like the Scottish Parliament, some form of short money?
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
Yes they are all funded from London and are basically English sockpuppet organisations, with lickspittles who are happy to take cash under false pretences.
No they are not, but the low level of donations does seem remarkable to me - with so many Indy backers even with some being a bit annoyed with the SNP at present it seems strange.
Would you hand over cash to that bunch of grifters, £660K missing , accounts a disaster with no idea how much money they received or where it went etc. People have finally understood they are at it, their goose is cooked.
I wouldn't, but it doesn't take many idiots to get more than £4k - people give more than that to far more direct grifters.
That they had to rely on a 6 figure loan from their own chief executive is very telling. That is not what well run organisations do.
I've just watched the Bairstow stumping. As a village wicketkeeper, I've done that a few times. Nowt wrong with it, it's the batman's one job to not chuck his wicket away cheaply.
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
I suspect Reform has plenty of money and wealthy backers and people still give money to the Conservative Party which is an ever greater lost cause.
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
Yes they are all funded from London and are basically English sockpuppet organisations, with lickspittles who are happy to take cash under false pretences.
Don’t let the facts, conveniently posted just before your comment, get in the way of a good rant.
Australia were unsporting not to withdraw that appeal.
Bairstow was a muppet for allowing it to happen.
Sorry but after Broad did not walk when clearly he hit it (ashes series a few years ago) then england cannot accuse Australia of being unsporting - Broad rightly or wrongly that day set the dial to play by the strict rules and therefore that works both ways occasionally
Australia were unsporting not to withdraw that appeal.
Bairstow was a muppet for allowing it to happen.
Sorry but after Broad did not walk when clearly he hit it (ashes series a few years ago) then england cannot accuse Australia of being unsporting - Broad rightly or wrongly that day set the dial to play by the strict rules and therefore that works both ways occasionally
Yes, that was far worse than the Bairstow incident today.
F1 on the TV, Cricket on the laptop, the iPad switching between here & a motorsport forum, and the phone for the F1 live timing. Should be a fun next couple of hours!
Clearly not as you've omitted the real sport this afternoon from The Curragh.
9 go in the Irish Derby, five are trained by Aidan O'Brien and one each by his sons Joseph and Donnacha so it's a bit like the private sweepstakes of old. AUGUSTE RODIN is 3/10 to follow up from Epsom and probably wins - he has a fair bit in hand on WHITE BIRCH and SPREWELL.
Nine means three places so one at a big price to crawl in the frame - the money has come for SAN ANTONIO from 40s to 22s but I'd have a small amount on PROUD AND REGAL at 40s - he's a full to a couple of decent stayers and I'm sure it all happened too quick in the Irish 2000 Guineas last time.
Australia were unsporting not to withdraw that appeal.
Bairstow was a muppet for allowing it to happen.
Sorry but after Broad did not walk when clearly he hit it (ashes series a few years ago) then england cannot accuse Australia of being unsporting - Broad rightly or wrongly that day set the dial to play by the strict rules and therefore that works both ways occasionally
You could argue every time a batsman nicks the ball and calls for a review hoping that it doesn't show up on snickometer is against the spirit of cricket, but about 90% of international cricketers do it.
Australia were unsporting not to withdraw that appeal.
Bairstow was a muppet for allowing it to happen.
Sorry but after Broad did not walk when clearly he hit it (ashes series a few years ago) then england cannot accuse Australia of being unsporting - Broad rightly or wrongly that day set the dial to play by the strict rules and therefore that works both ways occasionally
Who walks when they hit but were not given out?
exactly - but who does not attempt a run out when they can?
No they are not, but the low level of donations does seem remarkable to me - with so many Indy backers even with some being a bit annoyed with the SNP at present it seems strange.
Would you hand over cash to that bunch of grifters, £660K missing , accounts a disaster with no idea how much money they received or where it went etc. People have finally understood they are at it, their goose is cooked.
I wouldn't, but it doesn't take many idiots to get more than £4k - people give more than that to far more direct grifters.
That they had to rely on a 6 figure loan from their own chief executive is very telling. That is not what well run organisations do.
That one was debatable , the treasurer could not work the computer and it was only registered when someone publicised it. Seemingly his wife had no knowledge of it either and purely a coincidence that it matched the price of a well known campervan model.
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
It is only because of a specific let-out in the electoral legislation, inserted IIRC by the Blair or Cameron administrations, I forget which, that "Scottish Labour" can call itself that on ballot papers at all without breaching the strict rules on party naming. There is no such separate organization for EC purposes - as seen by central HQ's yanking of the chain when Ms Dugdale seemed well on the way to blow party funds on a court case. SLD and SCUP are slightly more within the spirit of the wider legislation, though.
Edit: not at all clear to me how one can be specific about how much £££ Slab do or don't receive, in that context, as for instance stated in the header.
I've just watched the Bairstow stumping. As a village wicketkeeper, I've done that a few times. Nowt wrong with it, it's the batman's one job to not chuck his wicket away cheaply.
I still think he ought not to have been out. He clearly grounded his foot, having returned to his ground, didn’t he (?) - and looked back at it to confirm before stepping away again.
Technically, he can be said to have started a run, and then returned to his ground ?
30.1.2 However, a batter shall not be considered to be out of his/her ground if, in running or diving towards his/her ground and beyond, and having grounded some part of his/her person or bat beyond the popping crease, there is subsequent loss of contact between the ground and any part of his/her person or bat, or between the bat and person.
A more interesting question for me is who the hell has donated £200,000 to the "Scottish" Lib Dems whose number of MSPs (4) does not even constitute an official party in Holyrood. I suppose the truth is that the "Scottish" unionist parties are primarily funded from England.
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
Yes they are all funded from London and are basically English sockpuppet organisations, with lickspittles who are happy to take cash under false pretences.
Don’t let the facts, conveniently posted just before your comment, get in the way of a good rant.
via Russia as well in many cases. Tories just gotta grift.
I've just watched the Bairstow stumping. As a village wicketkeeper, I've done that a few times. Nowt wrong with it, it's the batman's one job to not chuck his wicket away cheaply.
I still think he ought not to have been out. He clearly grounded his foot, having returned to his ground, didn’t he (?) - and looked back at it to confirm before stepping away again.
Technically, he can be said to have started a run, and then returned to his ground ?
30.1.2 However, a batter shall not be considered to be out of his/her ground if, in running or diving towards his/her ground and beyond, and having grounded some part of his/her person or bat beyond the popping crease, there is subsequent loss of contact between the ground and any part of his/her person or bat, or between the bat and person.
I think it was clever keeping, Bairstow made it easy and the umpires agreed. It'll be argued for years!
If being 'intellectually dead from the neck up' disqualified people from winning at next general election, I'm afraid virtually our whole political class would face the chop.
We'd end up with almost no MPs at all and tumbleweed blowing through the Chamber in 2025.
I've just watched the Bairstow stumping. As a village wicketkeeper, I've done that a few times. Nowt wrong with it, it's the batman's one job to not chuck his wicket away cheaply.
I still think he ought not to have been out. He clearly grounded his foot, having returned to his ground, didn’t he (?) - and looked back at it to confirm before stepping away again.
Technically, he can be said to have started a run, and then returned to his ground ?
30.1.2 However, a batter shall not be considered to be out of his/her ground if, in running or diving towards his/her ground and beyond, and having grounded some part of his/her person or bat beyond the popping crease, there is subsequent loss of contact between the ground and any part of his/her person or bat, or between the bat and person.
I think it was clever keeping, Bairstow made it easy and the umpires agreed. It'll be argued for years!
It was poor umpiring, IMO, and pretty pathetic from the keeper. No doubt it will be argued over, but the facts look quite plain to me - unless you can point out how I’m misinterpreting the laws ?
I've just watched the Bairstow stumping. As a village wicketkeeper, I've done that a few times. Nowt wrong with it, it's the batman's one job to not chuck his wicket away cheaply.
I still think he ought not to have been out. He clearly grounded his foot, having returned to his ground, didn’t he (?) - and looked back at it to confirm before stepping away again.
Technically, he can be said to have started a run, and then returned to his ground ?
30.1.2 However, a batter shall not be considered to be out of his/her ground if, in running or diving towards his/her ground and beyond, and having grounded some part of his/her person or bat beyond the popping crease, there is subsequent loss of contact between the ground and any part of his/her person or bat, or between the bat and person.
I think it was clever keeping, Bairstow made it easy and the umpires agreed. It'll be argued for years!
It was poor umpiring, IMO, and pretty pathetic from the keeper. No doubt it will be argued over, but the facts look quite plain to me - unless you can point out how I’m misinterpreting the laws ?
I can't fault your logic or interpretation. It's what makes Test Cricket so good, so human, even with all the cameras and sensors.
In January, French President Emmanuel Macron promised the delivery of these highly mobile reconnaissance armoured vehicles on wheels, equipped with a formidable 105mm cannon. Four months later, they were already in service on the front line, according to the Ukrainian government.
But in this high-intensity war marked by constant heavy artillery strikes, their thin armour is proving to be a major weakness, according to Major Spartanets.
"There have been cases where a 152mm shell has exploded nearby and the shrapnel has pierced the vehicle," noted the 34-year-old officer, who said this has already resulted in the death of the crew on one occasion.
"A shell exploded next to the vehicle, the fragments pierced the armour and the stock of ammunition (on board) was detonated", says the Ukrainian officer. "The crew of four, unfortunately, remained inside; they were killed in the armoured vehicle."…
Three more Spanish polls today, one shows the race quite close with s tightening lead for the right of just 3% but the other two see healthy larger leads. With 3 weeks to the poll it could still go either way.
"Statement from the MCC: “After this morning’s play, emotions were running high, and words were unfortunately exchanged with some of the Australian team, by a small number of Members.
"We have unreservedly apologised to the Australian Team and will deal with any Member who has not maintained the standard we expect through our disciplinary processes.
"It was not necessary to eject anyone from the ground and I am pleased to say that there was no repeat of this as the players resumed the field for this afternoon.""
Suella Braverman’s rhetoric about child sexual abuse and grooming gangs has cost her the support of an influential Conservative backer, Steve Baker, in a sign her hardline approach to culture war issues could hamper her chances of becoming Tory leader.
Baker, a Tory MP on the Brexiter right of the party, who is now a Northern Ireland minister, was Braverman’s de facto campaign manager when she stood to succeed Boris Johnson as Conservative leader and prime minister last summer.
While Braverman, now the home secretary, was eliminated in the second round of MPs’ voting, her candidacy was seen as a marker for a possible future contest, one likely if the Conservatives lose the next general election.
However, it is understood Baker has decided he would not back Braverman again because of serious concerns over the way she has approached the issue of so-called grooming gangs.
Suella Braverman’s rhetoric about child sexual abuse and grooming gangs has cost her the support of an influential Conservative backer, Steve Baker, in a sign her hardline approach to culture war issues could hamper her chances of becoming Tory leader.
Baker, a Tory MP on the Brexiter right of the party, who is now a Northern Ireland minister, was Braverman’s de facto campaign manager when she stood to succeed Boris Johnson as Conservative leader and prime minister last summer.
While Braverman, now the home secretary, was eliminated in the second round of MPs’ voting, her candidacy was seen as a marker for a possible future contest, one likely if the Conservatives lose the next general election.
However, it is understood Baker has decided he would not back Braverman again because of serious concerns over the way she has approached the issue of so-called grooming gangs.
I don't think you can play Broad, Anderson, Robinson, Tongue....that tail-end is far too long. Its 4 rabbits.
If it had been say Ali, Woakes, Broad, Anderson. Stokes wouldn't have had to hide Ali and Woakes away from the bowling, thus the pressure would have really been Australia.
Two entertaining matches, but still going to be 2-0 - a whitewash not out of the question. Statisticians won't be able to tell it was an entertaining series.
Two entertaining matches, but still going to be 2-0 - a whitewash not out of the question. Statisticians won't be able to tell it was an entertaining series.
Comments
Fucking disgrace we share a monarch with them.
Ban them from putting the Union Jack on their flag.
Australia were unsporting not to withdraw that appeal.
Bairstow was a muppet for allowing it to happen.
Steve Smith drops a Stokes sitter.
DROPPPPPED....LOL.
Suella Braverman’s rhetoric about child sexual abuse and grooming gangs has cost her the support of an influential Conservative backer, Steve Baker, in a sign her hardline approach to culture war issues could hamper her chances of becoming Tory leader.
Baker, a Tory MP on the Brexiter right of the party, who is now a Northern Ireland minister, was Braverman’s de facto campaign manager when she stood to succeed Boris Johnson as Conservative leader and prime minister last summer.
While Braverman, now the home secretary, was eliminated in the second round of MPs’ voting, her candidacy was seen as a marker for a possible future contest, one likely if the Conservatives lose the next general election.
However, it is understood Baker has decided he would not back Braverman again because of serious concerns over the way she has approached the issue of so-called grooming gangs.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/02/steve-baker-withdraws-support-for-suella-braverman-over-grooming-gangs-rhetoric-says-ally
I remind anyone who might be inclined to object to my use of inverted commas around "Scottish" that none of the 3 unionist parties are recognised as parties by the electoral commission. They are branch offices pretending to be something else (notable that none of the 3 ruling elements of these parties call themselves English Labour Party etc. etc.)
https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk//?currentPage=1&rows=10&query=Scottish Liberal
Good article, thank you.
That they had to rely on a 6 figure loan from their own chief executive is very telling. That is not what well run organisations do.
https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/Search/Donations?currentPage=1&rows=10&query=snp&sort=AcceptedDate&order=desc&tab=1&open=filter&et=pp&et=tp&et=perpar&et=rd&et=ppm&isIrishSourceYes=true&isIrishSourceNo=true&date=Received&from=&to=&quarters=2023Q1234&prePoll=true&postPoll=true&donorStatus=individual&donorStatus=tradeunion&donorStatus=company&donorStatus=unincorporatedassociation&donorStatus=publicfund&donorStatus=other&donorStatus=registeredpoliticalparty&donorStatus=friendlysociety&donorStatus=trust&donorStatus=limitedliabilitypartnership&donorStatus=impermissibledonor&donorStatus=na&donorStatus=unidentifiabledonor&donorStatus=buildingsociety®ister=gb®ister=ni®ister=none&optCols=Register&optCols=CampaigningName&optCols=AccountingUnitsAsCentralParty&optCols=IsSponsorship&optCols=IsIrishSource&optCols=RegulatedDoneeType&optCols=CompanyRegistrationNumber&optCols=Postcode&optCols=NatureOfDonation&optCols=PurposeOfVisit&optCols=DonationAction&optCols=ReportedDate&optCols=IsReportedPrePoll&optCols=ReportingPeriodName&optCols=IsBequest&optCols=IsAggregation
9 go in the Irish Derby, five are trained by Aidan O'Brien and one each by his sons Joseph and Donnacha so it's a bit like the private sweepstakes of old. AUGUSTE RODIN is 3/10 to follow up from Epsom and probably wins - he has a fair bit in hand on WHITE BIRCH and SPREWELL.
Nine means three places so one at a big price to crawl in the frame - the money has come for SAN ANTONIO from 40s to 22s but I'd have a small amount on PROUD AND REGAL at 40s - he's a full to a couple of decent stayers and I'm sure it all happened too quick in the Irish 2000 Guineas last time.
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/en/cricket/test-matches/england-v-australia-betting-32425691
Edit: not at all clear to me how one can be specific about how much £££ Slab do or don't receive, in that context, as for instance stated in the header.
He clearly grounded his foot, having returned to his ground, didn’t he (?) - and looked back at it to confirm before stepping away again.
Technically, he can be said to have started a run, and then returned to his ground ?
30.1.2 However, a batter shall not be considered to be out of his/her ground if, in running or diving towards his/her ground and beyond, and having grounded some part of his/her person or bat beyond the popping crease, there is subsequent loss of contact between the ground and any part of his/her person or bat, or between the bat and person.
Come along, Mr Stokes, Papa needs a new pair of everything !!
It’s not as though we will ever hear the end of anything else from him, either.
virtually our whole political class would face the chop.
We'd end up with almost no MPs at all and tumbleweed blowing through the Chamber in 2025.
No doubt it will be argued over, but the facts look quite plain to me - unless you can point out how I’m misinterpreting the laws ?
Ukrainian commander warns French tanks are inadequate for counteroffensive
https://www.euronews.com/2023/07/02/ukrainian-commander-warns-french-tanks-are-inadequate-for-counteroffensive
…"They are used for supporting fire, because of their light armour," he said. "Their armament is good, their observation instruments are very good. But unfortunately it's light armour, which makes them unsuitable."
In January, French President Emmanuel Macron promised the delivery of these highly mobile reconnaissance armoured vehicles on wheels, equipped with a formidable 105mm cannon. Four months later, they were already in service on the front line, according to the Ukrainian government.
But in this high-intensity war marked by constant heavy artillery strikes, their thin armour is proving to be a major weakness, according to Major Spartanets.
"There have been cases where a 152mm shell has exploded nearby and the shrapnel has pierced the vehicle," noted the 34-year-old officer, who said this has already resulted in the death of the crew on one occasion.
"A shell exploded next to the vehicle, the fragments pierced the armour and the stock of ammunition (on board) was detonated", says the Ukrainian officer. "The crew of four, unfortunately, remained inside; they were killed in the armoured vehicle."…
Three more Spanish polls today, one shows the race quite close with s tightening lead for the right of just 3% but the other two see healthy larger leads. With 3 weeks to the poll it could still go either way.
"We have unreservedly apologised to the Australian Team and will deal with any Member who has not maintained the standard we expect through our disciplinary processes.
"It was not necessary to eject anyone from the ground and I am pleased to say that there was no repeat of this as the players resumed the field for this afternoon.""
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/cricket/65033457
Broad bash to try to unsettle the Aussies?
Going at 2-3 an over wont' cut it, even though there is technically time.
If it had been say Ali, Woakes, Broad, Anderson. Stokes wouldn't have had to hide Ali and Woakes away from the bowling, thus the pressure would have really been Australia.
Like imagine playing that innings and it not being your best in Test cricket.
https://twitter.com/ajarrodkimber/status/1675508640193601541
ArsenalAussies, always cheating.Still, imagine the hilarity if Anderson nurdled his way to a 50 and shocked the world.