Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

The local elections – the broad trends so far – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 11,005
edited May 2023 in General
The local elections – the broad trends so far – politicalbetting.com

Labour has continued to make larger gains in areas with fewer university graduates, while the Conservatives are going back fastest in areas with more… #LocalElections2023 @SkyNews pic.twitter.com/85r8Njng0j

Read the full story here

«13456712

Comments

  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    edited May 2023
    1st, like Labour and the LibDems ;)

    Thanks for this Mike.

    The Times are suggesting that trouble is now brewing for Rishi Sunak in the tory party. I think we're going to see more in-fighting and the right wing of the party attempting to wrest back control. This is what the Times are reporting.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/local-elections-2023-tory-right-plotting-to-take-back-control-after-drubbing-7jkrxkgjp

    £££

    Sunak is losing the very people that Boris reached and that's fatal for their chances because they're also losing middle England to Labour and the LibDems.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,097
    Bring back Boris. And Liz.
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415

    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    Morning all.

    Looking like a triumph for Keir Starmer.

    Oh dear. Here we go.

    Please Explain the Dudley result to us.
    Labour are up 8.4% in the south, 8% in the North, and 5.6% in the Midlands.

    I get it that you are a rabid tory but take off your blinkers and go and read the analysis on Sky News and BBC.

    But. The Sky NEV is being so much kinder to Labour than aunty’s PNS.

    If you don’t know the difference between the two, the battle between the National Equivalent methodologies, you might be interested, because the psephologists behind them are pointing to two different takes at the moment, and different broadcasters reporting to that.

    NEV on Sky, which starts from Tories and Labour 31% each, and PNS on aunty, which starts at 28% each. The point being you are more likely to get consensus between Neville and Carragher - the beebs PNS has Labour struggling on only 35%, the Skys NEV has Labour respectfully topping at over 40%.
    The night shift as you see on old thread, debated this through the wee small hours. I believe this graphic to be the Sky NEV, not the raw votes cast. The NEV starts at 31 each, so that’s Labour 40, Tories 28, a Labour win by 12.

    I don’t expect the Nev to narrow throughout the day, grow ifanything.

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,258
    Looks like a fair amount of Conservative abstentions, tactical voting against Conservatives and a modest but decent increase in the Labour vote where it matters.

    They are probably on course for a small majority, but let's see how it looks by the end of the day.

    [You also sort of wonder if it would have better for Rishi had council tax rises, income tax rises, energy bill increases and interest rate rises not all hit together in the last few weeks.]
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    For the record, by the way, from a personal perspective I would be really happy to have a Labour-LibDem coalition. I just don't think it's very likely. The stars really have to align and if you're playing that game you can just as easily end up with a 1992.

    There is nothing at the moment to suggest to me that the Conservatives are going to retain power. For us punters you obviously can't say it's 0% but it's not a lot above.
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415
    The latest from Professor Thrasher

    The Conservatives have lost a third of their council seats so far – a hammering by any standard. If that trend continues the party is likely to post a final tally that rivals the debacle of 1995 that left them limping towards a massacre at the general election two years later.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,234
    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    The LibDems who propped up David Cameron? Is that radical or progressive?
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415
    The Tories had 37 seats on Bath and NE Somerset in 2015. This morning just 3.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    edited May 2023

    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    The LibDems who propped up David Cameron? Is that radical or progressive?
    Yeah, damn these parties who break their promises on tuition fees when they get a sniff of power… oh wait

    (absolutely not a fan of coalition-era LibDems myself but there you go)
  • Options
    IcarusIcarus Posts: 896
    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,848
    While we all revel in the Tory shellacking let us not forget our friends in the North...

    Humza Yousaf became embroiled in another SNP crisis last night after seven councillors were poised to leave the party over its handling of sexual harassment allegations.

    A delegation at North Lanarkshire council accused the SNP hierarchy of failing to investigate alleged cover-ups and bullying in the wake of sexual misconduct claims against their former leader, Jordan Linden.

    The gang of seven had alleged numerous failings by the local leadership team, including a failure to investigate sexual misconduct and “abuse of power”.

    They highlighted that many SNP figures accused of inaction were employed by senior MSPs and MPs, including Neil Gray, the economy secretary, who ran Yousaf’s leadership campaign. Airdrie South, which is in Gray’s constituency, now has no SNP councillors because of the mass resignations.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/snp-hit-by-allegations-of-sex-pest-cover-up-2nczqjjq6
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    near 100% convinced” ??

    So doubt is beginning to creep in….
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249

    The latest from Professor Thrasher

    The Conservatives have lost a third of their council seats so far – a hammering by any standard. If that trend continues the party is likely to post a final tally that rivals the debacle of 1995 that left them limping towards a massacre at the general election two years later.

    This is probably going to be the takeaway snapshot of this vote.

    But then I would hope that, wouldn't I? ;)

    Seriously though, Michael Thrasher is usually pretty balanced and insightful.
  • Options
    StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 6,975
    edited May 2023

    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    The LibDems who propped up David Cameron? Is that radical or progressive?
    To be fair brexit wouldn’t have happened without them. That’s pretty radical
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249

    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    The LibDems who propped up David Cameron? Is that radical or progressive?
    To be fair brexit wouldn’t have happened without them.
    :smiley:
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Looks like Labours best result in years, but the Tories are some way from collapsing. The thing that should worry them is that the anti Tory vote seems to be organising itself again.
  • Options
    GhedebravGhedebrav Posts: 3,000
    Heathener said:

    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    The LibDems who propped up David Cameron? Is that radical or progressive?
    An awful moment. But you only have to look at what Nick Clegg is doing now to realise how it happened ...
    I reckon they might take Hallam back though.
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    IanB2 said:

    Heathener said:

    I don't think this piece on Keir Starmer is particularly insightful but the points about factionalism and 'continuity Blair' do alarm me.

    https://inews.co.uk/opinion/keir-starmer-doubts-loudest-labour-shadow-cabinet-2316816

    I am near 100% convinced that Starmer will be next PM, assuming Sunak makes it to the next election that is.

    But does this enthral me? Not really. Bear in mind that I never voted for Tony Blair though. I want to see these wretched tories booted out, and for a long time, but I'd hope for something more progressive and radical than continuity Blair. The LibDems would bring that to the Cabinet table.

    near 100% convinced” ??

    So doubt is beginning to creep in….
    I'm a Kantian epistemologist.

    Nothing is ever 100%.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,899
    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.
  • Options
    Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 4,595
    FPT

    Heathener said:

    Morning all.

    Looking like a triumph for Keir Starmer.

    Oh dear. Here we go.

    Please Explain the Dudley result to us.
    OK. Dudley: Election by thirds only. Labour win a majority of the 1/3 of the seats up for election, in a Conservative council where all 4 parliamentary seats are Conservative with big majorities, and 3 have been Conservative since 2010.
  • Options
    Wulfrun_PhilWulfrun_Phil Posts: 4,595
    edited May 2023
    Scott_xP said:

    While we all revel in the Tory shellacking let us not forget our friends in the North...

    Humza Yousaf became embroiled in another SNP crisis last night after seven councillors were poised to leave the party over its handling of sexual harassment allegations.

    A delegation at North Lanarkshire council accused the SNP hierarchy of failing to investigate alleged cover-ups and bullying in the wake of sexual misconduct claims against their former leader, Jordan Linden.

    The gang of seven had alleged numerous failings by the local leadership team, including a failure to investigate sexual misconduct and “abuse of power”.

    They highlighted that many SNP figures accused of inaction were employed by senior MSPs and MPs, including Neil Gray, the economy secretary, who ran Yousaf’s leadership campaign. Airdrie South, which is in Gray’s constituency, now has no SNP councillors because of the mass resignations.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/snp-hit-by-allegations-of-sex-pest-cover-up-2nczqjjq6

    Can anyone explain how calculations of the "National" Equivalent Vote based on local government elections in parts of England only can be extrapolated to capture what is happening in Scotland at the moment? Genuine query.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    edited May 2023
    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
  • Options
    bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,531
    We’ve had a first Mayoral result in Middlesbrough, and has the abolition of SV given the win to Labour?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E06000002#mayor-scoreboard
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215

    Scott_xP said:

    While we all revel in the Tory shellacking let us not forget our friends in the North...

    Humza Yousaf became embroiled in another SNP crisis last night after seven councillors were poised to leave the party over its handling of sexual harassment allegations.

    A delegation at North Lanarkshire council accused the SNP hierarchy of failing to investigate alleged cover-ups and bullying in the wake of sexual misconduct claims against their former leader, Jordan Linden.

    The gang of seven had alleged numerous failings by the local leadership team, including a failure to investigate sexual misconduct and “abuse of power”.

    They highlighted that many SNP figures accused of inaction were employed by senior MSPs and MPs, including Neil Gray, the economy secretary, who ran Yousaf’s leadership campaign. Airdrie South, which is in Gray’s constituency, now has no SNP councillors because of the mass resignations.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/snp-hit-by-allegations-of-sex-pest-cover-up-2nczqjjq6

    Can anyone explain how calculations of the "National" Equivalent Vote based on local government elections in parts of England only can be extrapolated to capture what is happening in Scotland at the moment? Genuine query.
    I bet they are just slipping in the latest Scottish poll results and using those?
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    From Nick Eardley BBC:

    "Over the past few weeks, Tory insiders had said losing 1,000 seats was possible. That was expectation management – designed to make a slightly better result look good.

    But it’s quite possible that by the end of the day, the Conservatives could been looking at four figure losses."

  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,899
    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    Where ?

    The Tory vote has held up broadly in Coventry but Labours won Cheylesmore there which is a swing seat. Good hold in Bablake ward tho for the Tories.
    All 3 seats in Cov are lab now and next GE tho.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    edited May 2023
    Heathener said:

    For the record, by the way, from a personal perspective I would be really happy to have a Labour-LibDem coalition. I just don't think it's very likely. The stars really have to align and if you're playing that game you can just as easily end up with a 1992.

    There is nothing at the moment to suggest to me that the Conservatives are going to retain power. For us punters you obviously can't say it's 0% but it's not a lot above.

    Good morning

    That cannot be right as you have maintained for months the conservative party are heading to extinction
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415
    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    If you are using Worcester as your example, where Labour achieved a measly 1 seat gain? Not good enough for a general election win?

    The LLG took 7 seats from the Tories in Worcester, and Labour well placed as the challenger to take the Tory seat.

    Sure, after Corbyn ratnered the Labour brand and left them more than 120 seat wins from an overall majority, Labour were left with a huge electoral hurdle. But when the dust settles on this election, and the situation in westminster seats like Worcester are analysed the overall majority from this position is definitely on, despite how these results may at first glance appear patchy for Labour.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247

    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    If you are using Worcester as your example, where Labour achieved a measly 1 seat gain? Not good enough for a general election win?

    The LLG took 7 seats from the Tories in Worcester, and Labour well placed as the challenger to take the Tory seat.

    Sure, after Corbyn ratnered the Labour brand and left them more than 120 seat wins from an overall majority, Labour were left with a huge electoral hurdle. But when the dust settles on this election, and the situation in westminster seats like Worcester are analysed the overall majority from this position is definitely on, despite how these results may at first glance appear patchy for Labour.
    Sam Coates has just said that on these results Labour need big gains in Scotland to win a majority
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    I understand the conservatives lost Plymouth but what on earth did they expect when felling trees

    I would have voted to throw them out without hesitation if I was living there

    Pure vandalism
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,691
    My impression is Labour doing about as well as predicted; Tories doing even worse than predicted; Lib Dems doing very well indeed. Equivalent swings in a GE would mean a comfortable majority for Labour.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247

    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    If you are using Worcester as your example, where Labour achieved a measly 1 seat gain? Not good enough for a general election win?

    The LLG took 7 seats from the Tories in Worcester, and Labour well placed as the challenger to take the Tory seat.

    Sure, after Corbyn ratnered the Labour brand and left them more than 120 seat wins from an overall majority, Labour were left with a huge electoral hurdle. But when the dust settles on this election, and the situation in westminster seats like Worcester are analysed the overall majority from this position is definitely on, despite how these results may at first glance appear patchy for Labour.
    Good morning @MoonRabbit

    I have just be reading through the thread and just want to say how amazing your contribution has been through the night

    Excellent
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,578
    A new dawn may have broken, but it is grey and damp in West Yorkshire.

    Anyway, Worcester Woman has spoken:

    "The Conservatives suffered a disastrous night in Worcester as Labour became the largest party on the city council for the first time in 23 years.

    The Tories lost all seven seats they were defending and also fell behind the Green Party, which took four seats to become the second largest group."
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,848
    @KevinASchofield

    UPDATE: Labour hails "seismic" win in Medway on a grim night for Rishi Sunak.

    Labour source: "The Tory campaign was a total fucking shambles."
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,848
    @BNHWalker

    Labour take control of Medway for the first time this century. This is Rochester, Strood, Gillingham and Chatham - seats key to Blair's 1997 landslide.
  • Options
    GhedebravGhedebrav Posts: 3,000
    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,578

    We’ve had a first Mayoral result in Middlesbrough, and has the abolition of SV given the win to Labour?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E06000002#mayor-scoreboard

    That is a bit of a LOL.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,336
    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,175

    We’ve had a first Mayoral result in Middlesbrough, and has the abolition of SV given the win to Labour?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E06000002#mayor-scoreboard

    I woke up in 2019 as a Labour candidate in Stockton thinking "uh-oh, we're in trouble". In 2023 my former colleagues will be waking up buzzing. The 20% swing against the Tory independent mayor in Boro will hearten everyone.
  • Options
    SandraMcSandraMc Posts: 591
    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    My local ward (on the south coast) has gone from Conservative to Green. It was the sewage in the sea wot done it.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,848
    @KevinASchofield
    46s
    The hits keep coming for the Tories.

    Lib Dems gain control of Windsor & Maidenhead from Tories.

    "This is a huge win for the Lib Dems and a massive blow to Rishi Sunak," says party spokesperson.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,258
    Heathener said:

    For the record, by the way, from a personal perspective I would be really happy to have a Labour-LibDem coalition. I just don't think it's very likely. The stars really have to align and if you're playing that game you can just as easily end up with a 1992.

    There is nothing at the moment to suggest to me that the Conservatives are going to retain power. For us punters you obviously can't say it's 0% but it's not a lot above.

    Why would that be necessary given you've promised us a total reckoning, and a Conservative extinction event where all their MPs would all fit into a minibus, if they're lucky?
  • Options
    noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 20,625
    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    They should have insisted we bend the knee. Might have caused discombobulation on both sides.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    In that case I assume it was the Archbishop of Canterbury but Charles is King and he should have vetoed it

    It is simply ridiculous in these modern times

    The age of subjication is long over
  • Options
    StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 14,354
    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,258
    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    It was explained on here yesterday by @Ghedebrav I think.

    Press releases and media statements changed a very subtle invitation to anyone else who wanted to join in within the order of service to something that it wasn't.

    Of course, it will be too late for that to have any resonance now. Once the meme is out it is out.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,175

    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    If you are using Worcester as your example, where Labour achieved a measly 1 seat gain? Not good enough for a general election win?

    The LLG took 7 seats from the Tories in Worcester, and Labour well placed as the challenger to take the Tory seat.

    Sure, after Corbyn ratnered the Labour brand and left them more than 120 seat wins from an overall majority, Labour were left with a huge electoral hurdle. But when the dust settles on this election, and the situation in westminster seats like Worcester are analysed the overall majority from this position is definitely on, despite how these results may at first glance appear patchy for Labour.
    Worcester demonstrates why the Tories will lose the election. You don't blindly vote Labour, you vote actively against the Tory. The blues went from largest party to third thanks to tactical voting for greens. So many of the councils which have gone NOC aren't Tories retain power as a minority, they are Tories are OUT.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247

    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    They should have insisted we bend the knee. Might have caused discombobulation on both sides.
    Unfortunately one of my age issues I cannot bend my knee !!!!!
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,072
    edited May 2023
    First thought is that a lot of the most Brexity areas - the Saxon shore - are leaving the Tories for Others (not Labour).

    Braintree in Essex is an interesting exception* to this, but I'm looking at Boston, Castle Point, East Lindsey and South Holland so far.

    * And Medway in Kent. Though Medway might be London overspill finally showing up in elections.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,258
    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    I think Anthony King will be getting up from his grave to comment on this one.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,503
    Pulpstar said:

    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    Where ?

    The Tory vote has held up broadly in Coventry but Labours won Cheylesmore there which is a swing seat. Good hold in Bablake ward tho for the Tories.
    All 3 seats in Cov are lab now and next GE tho.
    Harlow perhaps.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000073
  • Options
    noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 20,625

    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    If you are using Worcester as your example, where Labour achieved a measly 1 seat gain? Not good enough for a general election win?

    The LLG took 7 seats from the Tories in Worcester, and Labour well placed as the challenger to take the Tory seat.

    Sure, after Corbyn ratnered the Labour brand and left them more than 120 seat wins from an overall majority, Labour were left with a huge electoral hurdle. But when the dust settles on this election, and the situation in westminster seats like Worcester are analysed the overall majority from this position is definitely on, despite how these results may at first glance appear patchy for Labour.
    Worcester demonstrates why the Tories will lose the election. You don't blindly vote Labour, you vote actively against the Tory. The blues went from largest party to third thanks to tactical voting for greens. So many of the councils which have gone NOC aren't Tories retain power as a minority, they are Tories are OUT.
    Yeah, a lot of the fun club point to a lack of enthusiam for Starmer and/or Labour as a super power that will save them. In reality when you are getting this kind of polling without enthusiasm for Starmer and Labour it is because the Tories are really, really unpopular, even with people who sometimes vote Tory.
  • Options
    StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 14,354
    SandraMc said:

    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    My local ward (on the south coast) has gone from Conservative to Green. It was the sewage in the sea wot done it.
    Echoes of the Aussie Teals, perhaps? How will Brit Greens adapt to an influx of conservationist conservative voters?
  • Options
    JACK_WJACK_W Posts: 651
    Tories lose 16 seats in South Kestevan to lose control to NOC. 2 results to com.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,175

    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    They should have insisted we bend the knee. Might have caused discombobulation on both sides.
    Unfortunately one of my age issues I cannot bend my knee !!!!!
    Traitor!!!
  • Options
    GhedebravGhedebrav Posts: 3,000

    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    It was explained on here yesterday by @Ghedebrav I think.

    Press releases and media statements changed a very subtle invitation to anyone else who wanted to join in within the order of service to something that it wasn't.

    Of course, it will be too late for that to have any resonance now. Once the meme is out it is out.
    Not me, though it makes sense.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,691

    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?

    Looks like both measures to be met but there's a prospect of a shedload of Tory losses to the Lib Dems in the seats still to be declared, mostly in the South of England. Lib Dems are back could be the message of the day.
  • Options
    darkagedarkage Posts: 4,787
    edited May 2023
    Scott_xP said:

    @BNHWalker

    Labour take control of Medway for the first time this century. This is Rochester, Strood, Gillingham and Chatham - seats key to Blair's 1997 landslide.

    Not sure how the politics are in this area but notably it does also has a lot of green belt. If the tories 'anti housebuilding' policies are going to be effective I would guess that it should lead to gains, not losses here.
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    I think this is really interesting. Apart from some last vestiges in the West Midlands, where exactly is there any remaining bedrock of Conservative support? They're taking a hammering everywhere.

    From Sam Coates Sky:

    'Alarm bells sounding in Conservative HQ'

    The Labour gain in Medway indicates the spread of Labour advances and "will sound an alarm bell in Conservative headquarters this morning", said deputy political editor Sam Coates.

    "Kent should be the place where he can say the Tories are hanging on but that's clearly not true," he said.

    Without the Tory stronghold, it is "not clear which bit of the electorate Rishi Sunak is making advances on".

    The outgoing Medway council leader "put the blame for that firmly at the door of Rishi Sunak" and his messaging, said Coates.

    He explained that in Kent and Essex "there is evidence of Labour doing much better than it has done for quite some years."

    It has been a "difficult area" under Jeremy Corbyn and Ed Miliband, so the result will be "heartening" for Keir Starmer's office.

    "We're now at the sharp end of the results," added Coates.
  • Options
    noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 20,625

    First thought is that a lot of the most Brexity areas - the Saxon shore - are leaving the Tories for Others (not Labour).

    Braintree in Essex is an interesting exception* to this, but I'm looking at Boston, Castle Point, East Lindsey and South Holland so far.

    * And Medway in Kent. Though Medway might be London overspill finally showing up in elections.

    Boston, Castle Point, East Lindsey and South Holland were 70%+ Brexit.

    Braintree 61% Brexit and since then will have had remainers move in from London too. Not really similar to the others.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,503
    FF43 said:

    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?

    Looks like both measures to be met but there's a prospect of a shedload of Tory losses to the Lib Dems in the seats still to be declared, mostly in the South of England. Lib Dems are back could be the message of the day.
    I suspect that Tory vote suppression has backfired completely. It has pissed off voters and not suppressed the vote much.

  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870

    IanB2 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    Labour has had a few stonking results, but there are a lot more areas where they haven’t taken anything from the Tories at all. Which might be of concern?
    If you are using Worcester as your example, where Labour achieved a measly 1 seat gain? Not good enough for a general election win?

    The LLG took 7 seats from the Tories in Worcester, and Labour well placed as the challenger to take the Tory seat.

    Sure, after Corbyn ratnered the Labour brand and left them more than 120 seat wins from an overall majority, Labour were left with a huge electoral hurdle. But when the dust settles on this election, and the situation in westminster seats like Worcester are analysed the overall majority from this position is definitely on, despite how these results may at first glance appear patchy for Labour.
    Worcester demonstrates why the Tories will lose the election. You don't blindly vote Labour, you vote actively against the Tory. The blues went from largest party to third thanks to tactical voting for greens. So many of the councils which have gone NOC aren't Tories retain power as a minority, they are Tories are OUT.
    Yes. It also demonstrates the social change which so many Conservatives don’t get. Worcester has been turning small l liberal over the past 10 years, full of craft beer micropubs, independent cafes, families pottering around on bikes. Next to that you have neanderthal Tory city and county councils who have gone on the record to say they won’t countenance any streetscape improvement that results in the loss of a single parking space.

    As a very regular visitor (we keep our boat there) I’m not at all surprised by the Worcester vote.
  • Options
    noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 20,625
    Foxy said:

    FF43 said:

    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?

    Looks like both measures to be met but there's a prospect of a shedload of Tory losses to the Lib Dems in the seats still to be declared, mostly in the South of England. Lib Dems are back could be the message of the day.
    I suspect that Tory vote suppression has backfired completely. It has pissed off voters and not suppressed the vote much.

    One of the great things about voter suppression is we shall never know but everyone can choose their own opinion on it......
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415
    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    Overnight greens picked up seats from Labour in Labour dominated councils, 4 from Tories in Worcester, to overtake Tories as second party. They can win anywhere. They are winning everywhere. It may be their first two seats on the council this time. Big next time it’s up to eight. Before long up to second. They are like the red weed from War of the Worlds.

    But they are phoney. Their agenda and policies cannot appeal to Tory and Labour voters equally. As Starmer distances himself from woke and trans from nationalisation and resetting UK capitalism, Greens muscle in though the told hold. They pick up Tory seats by opposing sewage, house building on green belt. Greens are not achieving this by being a serious party with a serious manifesto, they are the archetypal protest vote, most likely on a single local issue.
  • Options
    Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,288

    The Tories had 37 seats on Bath and NE Somerset in 2015. This morning just 3.

    So they took a bit of a bath then!


    Ok, it's early but I'll get me coat anyway.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    As predicted a bad night for the conservatives and inevitable following the Johnson/Truss debacle and the cost of living crisis

    Sunak remains their best hope and if he is reading the room then he has 18 months to reset our relationship with the EU and continue to make progress with the economy

    Those siren voices for Johnson and Truss need to understand the wrong person is taking the can for their period in office
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    Rishi Sunak has stemmed the haemorrhage which was happening under Liz Truss but that's about all he was good for. Let's be frank: he reaches no one in any of the key demographics he would need to win the next election. In this respect he is VERY different from Boris Johnson.

    (I'm not saying Starmer is exactly great either but he's better than Sunak.)
  • Options
    noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 20,625

    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    Overnight greens picked up seats from Labour in Labour dominated councils, 4 from Tories in Worcester, to overtake Tories as second party. They can win anywhere. They are winning everywhere. It may be their first two seats on the council this time. Big next time it’s up to eight. Before long up to second. They are like the red weed from War of the Worlds.

    But they are phoney. Their agenda and policies cannot appeal to Tory and Labour voters equally. As Starmer distances himself from woke and trans from nationalisation and resetting UK capitalism, Greens muscle in though the told hold. They pick up Tory seats by opposing sewage, house building on green belt. Greens are not achieving this by being a serious party with a serious manifesto, they are the archetypal protest vote, most likely on a single local issue.
    Fans of the big two often deride votes as mere protest votes. I am often tempted and occassionally do vote Green as a protest vote and think it at least as worthy as a vote for the big two, even though I believe in little of their actual manifesto.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,280
    SKS fans please explain.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,789
    edited May 2023

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    I think Anthony King will be getting up from his grave to comment on this one.
    It looks to me like the Conservatives are heading for about 850 losses.

    A rotten result, but actually *not* on a par with those of the mid 90's. The Conservatives have held onto councils that they lost quite comprehensively to Labour and the Lib Dems. back then.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,280
    On the stepmom index this is pretty bad for the Tories.

    Time to bring back Truss or Johnson.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,848
    @Sime0nStylites

    Would take real political skill to turn expectations management into an exercise in self targeting.

    Oh...
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,691
    FF43 said:

    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?

    Looks like both measures to be met but there's a prospect of a shedload of Tory losses to the Lib Dems in the seats still to be declared, mostly in the South of England. Lib Dems are back could be the message of the day.
    Should add Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories was expectations management by the Tories.

    They weren't really meant to do that badly.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,503

    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    Overnight greens picked up seats from Labour in Labour dominated councils, 4 from Tories in Worcester, to overtake Tories as second party. They can win anywhere. They are winning everywhere. It may be their first two seats on the council this time. Big next time it’s up to eight. Before long up to second. They are like the red weed from War of the Worlds.

    But they are phoney. Their agenda and policies cannot appeal to Tory and Labour voters equally. As Starmer distances himself from woke and trans from nationalisation and resetting UK capitalism, Greens muscle in though the told hold. They pick up Tory seats by opposing sewage, house building on green belt. Greens are not achieving this by being a serious party with a serious manifesto, they are the archetypal protest vote, most likely on a single local issue.
    No, I think the Greens are not yet looking at a national election, and do not want to be that sort of centralised national party.

    They are an interesting mix of alternative lifestyle neo-hippies, Corbynite refugees and Cameroonite Tories who care about global warming and shit in rivers. Difficult to unify, but not particularly needing to do so, at least not yet. I suspect that they will be good councilors.
  • Options
    TimSTimS Posts: 9,452
    FF43 said:

    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?

    Looks like both measures to be met but there's a prospect of a shedload of Tory losses to the Lib Dems in the seats still to be declared, mostly in the South of England. Lib Dems are back could be the message of the day.
    The Lib Dem performance is (I hope) a fascinating omen of what could happen at the GE due to the nature of FPTP.

    The Lib Dem vote share looks like it’s stayed almost at a standstill, while the conservatives vote has declined a little. But huge numbers of seats are falling to the Lib Dems. This is the sight of the dam break in areas where the yellows came second in the last election. All it takes is a few points of Tory decline and they clean up across large swathes of the country.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    As predicted a bad night for the conservatives and inevitable following the Johnson/Truss debacle and the cost of living crisis

    Sunak remains their best hope and if he is reading the room then he has 18 months to reset our relationship with the EU and continue to make progress with the economy

    Those siren voices for Johnson and Truss need to understand the wrong person is taking the can for their period in office

    Sunak was a key part of the Johnson administration. He is not the change we need.
  • Options
    JACK_WJACK_W Posts: 651

    The Tories had 37 seats on Bath and NE Somerset in 2015. This morning just 3.

    So they took a bit of a bath then!


    Ok, it's early but I'll get me coat anyway.
    The Tories are a shower in Bath .... :smiley: .... I'll get my bath robe

  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,937
    edited May 2023
    Sean_F said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    I think Anthony King will be getting up from his grave to comment on this one.
    It looks to me like the Conservatives are heading for about 850 losses.

    A rotten result, but actually *not* on a par with those of the mid 90's. The Conservatives have held onto councils that they lost quite comprehensively to Labour and the Lib Dems, back then.
    500 to 1000 losses about the same as Labour suffered in 2007 but still better than the over 1000 losses May had in 2019 or the over 2000 losses Major had in 1995.

    Sir Keir will be glad Labour have gained bellwether councils like Medway, Stoke and Plymouth but the results suggest they are heading for largest party in a hung parliament or small Labour majority but not a Labour landslide like 1997. For instance Harlow and Basildon and Redditch, which Blair won in 1997, have stayed blue
  • Options

    On the stepmom index this is pretty bad for the Tories.

    Time to bring back Truss or Johnson.

    This isn't the radical thinking I'd expect.

    For me, it's a toss up between Bridgen and Pincher.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,940
    edited May 2023
    Wary of a narrative before most votes are counted, but.
    Seems the chances of a Labour majority haven't changed much.
    The chances of the Tories retaining power have receded.
  • Options
    MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415

    Before all the excitement started, there were a couple of success criteria being bandied about.

    Labour needed to be 10 points ahead on NEV to be in a good position for the General Election.

    Conservatives needed to lose 1000 seats before people could point and laugh about a Terrible Night For The Tories. (Not that people should point and laugh really. Good councillors, doing well for their patch, will have been kicked out last night for wearing the wrong rosette. It's nature's way, but not nice, whoever's involved.)

    From what we've seen so far, is there a fair chance that both those boxes will be ticked?

    My post at 6.23 showing NEV currently giving them 12 point lead and % around 40, and the professors now expecting 4 digit Tory losses.

    Labour will achieve the bar asked of them according to NEV.

    However the PNS on BBC not showing a 10% lead or 40% last time I saw it.

    Anyone wish to paste up the latest PNS?
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,503
    HYUFD said:

    Sean_F said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    I think Anthony King will be getting up from his grave to comment on this one.
    It looks to me like the Conservatives are heading for about 850 losses.

    A rotten result, but actually *not* on a par with those of the mid 90's. The Conservatives have held onto councils that they lost quite comprehensively to Labour and the Lib Dems, back then.
    500 to 1000 losses about the same as Labour suffered in 2007 but still better than the over 1000 losses May had in 2019 or the over 2000 losses Major had in 1995.

    Sir Keir will be glad Labour have gained bellwether councils like Medway, Stoke and Plymouth but the results suggest they are heading for largest party in a hung parliament or small Labour majority but not a Labour landslide like 1997. For instance Harlow and Basildon and Redditch, which Blair won in 1997, have stayed blue
    So, mega losses on a background of previous mega losses, and in the Tory heartlands too.

  • Options
    StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 14,354

    On the stepmom index this is pretty bad for the Tories.

    Time to bring back Truss or Johnson.

    The hilarious/terrifying thing is that we all know that that will be being thought... at least in the Truss and Johnson households.

    There's "never give up" determination, and then there's Black Knight levels of delusion.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,789
    HYUFD said:

    Sean_F said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    I think Anthony King will be getting up from his grave to comment on this one.
    It looks to me like the Conservatives are heading for about 850 losses.

    A rotten result, but actually *not* on a par with those of the mid 90's. The Conservatives have held onto councils that they lost quite comprehensively to Labour and the Lib Dems, back then.
    500 to 1000 losses about the same as Labour suffered in 2007 but still better than the over 1000 losses May had in 2019 or the over 2000 losses Major had in 1995.

    Sir Keir will be glad Labour have gained bellwether councils like Medway, Stoke and Plymouth but the results suggest they are heading for largest party in a hung parliament or small Labour majority but not a Labour landslide like 1997. For instance Harlow and Basildon and Redditch, which Blair won in 1997, have stayed blue
    Braintree and Dudley, too.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    Sean_F said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Looks like the Tories are being battered everywhere tbh.
    Plymouth, Medway and Stoke good results for Labour to pick out 3 working class places.

    I think Anthony King will be getting up from his grave to comment on this one.
    It looks to me like the Conservatives are heading for about 850 losses.

    A rotten result, but actually *not* on a par with those of the mid 90's. The Conservatives have held onto councils that they lost quite comprehensively to Labour and the Lib Dems, back then.
    500 to 1000 losses about the same as Labour suffered in 2007 but still better than the over 1000 losses May had in 2019 or the over 2000 losses Major had in 1995.

    Sir Keir will be glad Labour have gained bellwether councils like Medway, Stoke and Plymouth but the results suggest they are heading for largest party in a hung parliament or small Labour majority but not a Labour landslide like 1997. For instance Harlow and Basildon and Redditch, which Blair won in 1997, have stayed blue
    How's your confident call that the Tories would be winning seats from the Lib Dems panning out at this early stage, out of interest?
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,216

    Nigelb said:

    Amusing that the king's senior spinner is now briefing that Charles wanted nothing to do with the 'loyalty oath'.
    Casino please explain.

    It was explained on here yesterday by @Ghedebrav I think.

    Press releases and media statements changed a very subtle invitation to anyone else who wanted to join in within the order of service to something that it wasn't.

    Of course, it will be too late for that to have any resonance now. Once the meme is out it is out.
    I find the whining about lack of deference to… traditional media hilarious.

    If you can’t report written facts better than a 14 year old gun nut from Nebraska with a MAGA poster on the wall of the basement, then you aren’t any better than him as a news source.

    “The story is the story, not the facts” is Trump territory.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    .

    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    Overnight greens picked up seats from Labour in Labour dominated councils, 4 from Tories in Worcester, to overtake Tories as second party. They can win anywhere. They are winning everywhere. It may be their first two seats on the council this time. Big next time it’s up to eight. Before long up to second. They are like the red weed from War of the Worlds.

    But they are phoney. Their agenda and policies cannot appeal to Tory and Labour voters equally. As Starmer distances himself from woke and trans from nationalisation and resetting UK capitalism, Greens muscle in though the told hold. They pick up Tory seats by opposing sewage, house building on green belt. Greens are not achieving this by being a serious party with a serious manifesto, they are the archetypal protest vote, most likely on a single local issue.
    Fans of the big two often deride votes as mere protest votes. I am often tempted and occassionally do vote Green as a protest vote and think it at least as worthy as a vote for the big two, even though I believe in little of their actual manifesto.
    I find it hard to believe that anyone could look at the Conservatives over the past few years, contrast them with the Greens, and conclude that the Conservatives are the “serious party” with a consistent message while the Greens are the flip-floppy ones. What short memories people have…
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,789

    .

    Ghedebrav said:

    Heathener said:

    Icarus said:

    At Harborough verification last night very difficult to be sure what has happened though possibly Green and Labour vote higher than expected -Green didn't campaign just put up paper candidates.. Misterton (Icarus's ward) probably depending on postal votes we which didn't see being opened and might not be helpful. Not rushing to the bookies!

    Greens also continued their rise in Exeter, gaining two more councillors to have 6 in total now.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2023/england/councils/E07000041
    Greens have had a good night so far. I’m a non-activist member and what I’m hearing on the Greenvine is general happiness with seats held and won. Their candidate selection has improved and, like the Lib Dems, they tend to do their job as councillors (unlike the typical hard right protest votes, who by-and-large are useless).
    Overnight greens picked up seats from Labour in Labour dominated councils, 4 from Tories in Worcester, to overtake Tories as second party. They can win anywhere. They are winning everywhere. It may be their first two seats on the council this time. Big next time it’s up to eight. Before long up to second. They are like the red weed from War of the Worlds.

    But they are phoney. Their agenda and policies cannot appeal to Tory and Labour voters equally. As Starmer distances himself from woke and trans from nationalisation and resetting UK capitalism, Greens muscle in though the told hold. They pick up Tory seats by opposing sewage, house building on green belt. Greens are not achieving this by being a serious party with a serious manifesto, they are the archetypal protest vote, most likely on a single local issue.
    Fans of the big two often deride votes as mere protest votes. I am often tempted and occassionally do vote Green as a protest vote and think it at least as worthy as a vote for the big two, even though I believe in little of their actual manifesto.
    I find it hard to believe that anyone could look at the Conservatives over the past few years, contrast them with the Greens, and conclude that the Conservatives are the “serious party” with a consistent message while the Greens are the flip-floppy ones. What short memories people have…
    The Greens have a consistent message. It's just an unpleasant one.
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,111

    SKS fans please explain.

    He is doing well due to the Tory leadership. Clearly this sets the stage for the return of Truss. Something I suspect she planned all along.
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,848
    @robpowellnews

    Some of the Tory advances Greg Hands pointed to...

    Bassetlaw - Tories gained 4 & have 8 seats compared to Labour's 38.

    Sandwell - Tories gained 2 & have 12 seats compared to Labour's 60.

    🤔
  • Options
    noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 20,625
    Jonathan said:

    As predicted a bad night for the conservatives and inevitable following the Johnson/Truss debacle and the cost of living crisis

    Sunak remains their best hope and if he is reading the room then he has 18 months to reset our relationship with the EU and continue to make progress with the economy

    Those siren voices for Johnson and Truss need to understand the wrong person is taking the can for their period in office

    Sunak was a key part of the Johnson administration. He is not the change we need.
    I kind of like Sunak but not his choices. Williamson, Zahawi, Raab, Braverman all either dim or toxic. Dowden as DPM, seriously?

    If he really wanted to reach out to the Blue Wall voters they are losing he should be working hard to get Rory the ex Tory and some of the others back into the party.
  • Options
    HeathenerHeathener Posts: 5,249
    edited May 2023
    Unusual for the BBC to be faster with results than Sky.

    Current Cons loss is 209 councillors out of 631 = 1/3rd of their seats.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,503
    JACK_W said:

    Tories lose 16 seats as Yellow Peril take Windsor.

    King to wear sandals at Coronation ?? ... :smiley:

    Did the King use a coin as photo ID when voting for the Lib Dem Focus Team?
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    DougSeal said:

    SKS fans please explain.

    He is doing well due to the Tory leadership. Clearly this sets the stage for the return of Truss. Something I suspect she planned all along.
    Truss was denied her moment with the voters. That. Is. a. disgrace.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,097

    On the stepmom index this is pretty bad for the Tories.

    Time to bring back Truss or Johnson.

    Truss and Johnson. And Uncle Tom Kwarteng and all.
This discussion has been closed.