Options
By election betting – politicalbetting.com

This betting opportunity from Smarkets on a by election in Boris Johnson’s seat is intriguing. This isn’t a bet on the outcome of such a by election but whether there will be one.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
edit: rats. Beaten by Bev.
Rats again.
Current 538 prediction:
Dem 49.5%
GOP 48.9%
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2022-election-forecast/senate/
Should be the easiest of easy holds for Labour, but the Tory share will be interesting given it was a swing seat not that long ago.
So it's probably an excellent idea.
My assumption had been that the Lib Dems would have been working very hard preparing the ground for by-elections in the constituencies held by the soon-to-be Lordships from Johnson's resignation honours, and so wouldn't want to spread themselves too thinly.
However the LDs were front runners in a few seats recently where they had been third. (Owen Paterson's especially). ASnd of course the Labour MP has been forced out in bad circumstances.
Worth a nibble at the right price. But SFAICS the dynamics have shifted and the world is now a Lab v Con contest between two heavyweights, with the LDs as onlookers.
25% is poor enough without fantasy meltdowns
Thank you Prime Minister @NarendraModi
for your kind words as I get started in my new role.
The UK and India share so much. I'm excited about what our two great democracies can achieve as we deepen our security, defence and economic partnership in the months & years ahead.
https://twitter.com/RishiSunak/status/1585645864261156870
Glad to speak to
@RishiSunak today. Congratulated him on assuming charge as UK PM. We will work together to further strengthen our Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. We also agreed on the importance of early conclusion of a comprehensive and balanced FTA.
https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1585643229034483712
https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/12587/Lost-USS-pension-benefits-can-be-returned-and-backdated-trustee-data-confirms?utm
"the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) trustee has released new information which shows the scheme is in such a healthy position that those lost benefits could be paid back, backdated to April - and still leave the scheme in surplus."
The word keir (also spelt kier) means a bleaching vat, from Old Norse 'ker'
Was Sir Keir dipped in a keir?
Asking for an academic friend.
source$:https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/10/27/baby-bison-uk-rewilding-wildlife/
The first in more than 6,000 years deserves some notice.
The calf appears to be doing well, judging by the article and the pictures in it.
London
Lab 64%
Con 16%
LD 9%
Ref 7%
Grn 4%
Rest of South
Lab 46%
Con 29%
LD 14%
Ref 6%
Grn 4%
Midlands and Wales
Lab 53%
Con 25%
Ref 6%
LD 6%
PC 5%
Grn 3%
North
Lab 60%
Con 20%
Ref 8%
LD 6%
Grn 4%
Scotland
SNP 46%
Lab 25%
Con 19%
LD 5%
Grn 3%
Ref 1%
(YouGov / The Times; Sample Size: 1646; Fieldwork: 25-26 October 2022)
https://twitter.com/bmay/status/1585594129874128897?s=46&t=g0hOX_7juKJm38OTfiMcAA
Attacking the RSPB is unwise.
The Battle of Bamber Bridge, 1943.
Racist US military police attacked black US troops on British soil.
US military authorities demanded the town’s pubs impose a colour bar, the local landlords responded with signs that read “Black Troops Only” which pissed them off.
A THREAD
https://twitter.com/AfricanArchives/status/1585360676826251264
Indeed I have maintained all along the polls next April and May will be a better test of just how he and the conservative party is performing
But I have a sneaking suspicion the polls will not be right. I suspect they will - in most every race - be wrong by 3-4 points. And that the direction of wrong will be fairly uniform, and therefore either the Republicans will outperform by 3-4 points, or the Democrats will.
I therefore think that the Republicans will either hold PA, and win GA, AZ and NV. (And maybe even CO too. Although NH is probably a bit of a stretch.)
Or the Dems will hold GA, AZ, CO, NV, and win PA, and quite possibly NC and WI too. With OH being an unlikely but not impossible ask
It is also far from impossible that McMullin wins in Utah. Deseret News has seen Lee's lead come down by a point every week, and had him at just four points ahead. And the most recent polls - from Hill Research - even showed McMullin leading by 8 points.
* Do remember that - in Georgia - if you fail to get 50%, there's a run-off election. And that there is a Libertarian candidate who will likely get 3% of the vote. If the polls are right, then a run-off is highly likely.
Does that mean Charles can go instead now?
Update: Putin: We do not need a nuclear strike on Ukraine and it is useless, either militarily or politically.
https://twitter.com/EndGameWW3/status/1585656808278032385
He also said he wouldn’t invade….
mandy rhodes
@holyroodmandy
"There is no evidence that predatory and abusive men have ever had to pretend to be anything else to carry out abusive and predatory behaviour."
Not, for instance, a policeman carrying out his duty? Not a taxi driver? Not a singing coach? Not a friend of your parents come to pick you up?
This is just frighteningly mad.
That person was not assigned female at birth.
- Labour ahead among the elderly (65+): Lab 40%, Con 34%, Ref 10%, LD 9%
- Only 8% (!!) of young voters (18-24) are intending to vote Conservative
- Labour, SNP and Greens doing well among women, while the Tories and Reform are doing proportionally better among men
- Scottish voters have a much higher propensity to actually cast their vote (10/10 likelihood): 65% compared to about 56% in England and Wales
- Women more likely to vote than men: 59% to 54%
- The Liberal Democrats have mind-bogglingly poor voter retention: only 43% of 2019 LD voters are intending to cast their next vote on the same party (cf Lab 90% and Con 60%).
And as for the other thing, I think 'else' refers to 'men' tbf. The 'predatory and abusive' carries forward.
Except that the Tories only have a majority on paper. In reality they are a barely functioning coalition of about 12 factions.
Much later.
As I understood it, though, there was a list of places that could potentially apply for a change in planning law (although the nature of that change hadn't been decided), and although no actual boundaries had been drawn, some of those named places could potentially have included designated sites.
It wasn't really worth the full on outrage.
I await any actual proposals.
And it's not just SSSIs that are the question. There are NNRs, AONB, NPs, and generally not having some numpty frack (or whatever) your local wood and them go bankrupt.
Would the police even investigate if it was a vagina?
Lots of incidents because it was damp. Someone put their car in the armco. Lots of yellow flags during the session (none last time) and someone spun in front of me going onto the grass and then back onto the track and stopping sideways on in front of me. Seemed to take me ages to react as it was so unexpected.
There are strict instructions where not to overtake (we weren't racing) and one is obviously the Chicane. So it came as a surprise to be overtaken by a saloon car as I was going through the Chicane which then slide nicely around the end of chicane. I was taken aback and then saw the name on the rear window. It was Tiff Needell taking people out on a 'scare the willies out of you' lap. I noticed in the restaurant that he took 5 sugars with his tea/coffee. Obviously that is what you need to do.
OK everyone what do I now add to the bucket list. Done the Pitts Special, done the racing car, I'm too old now for the catamarans and black runs. I need another challenge and I don't want to sky dive (heights, yuck).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwsxaYGJgyM
If I'm right that it was penis exposure, it'd take a brave "woman" to flash "her" cock and balls at teenage boys
The adrenalin is still pumping today and it did for ages after I skied that run. But it has to be done.
Labour leads by 32%.
Westminster Voting Intention (25-26 October):
Labour 55% (+1)
Conservative 23% (+2)
Liberal Democrat 9% (-2)
Green 5% (+1)
Reform UK 4% (–)
Scottish National Party 4% (+1)
Other 1% (-1)
Changes +/- 23 October
“Many skip work over hygiene poverty shame, charity says”
The way this is written - and the comments of the people/charities featured - are just absurd. Soap, basic toothpaste, unbranded shampoo and basic sanitary products are extremely cheap.
These people need their heads screwing on. They’re taking the piss out of the good Samaritans and bbc journos. Stories like this keep the daily mail in business.
“Struggling to make ends meet” stories are important, when reflecting genuine reality, but this reframing as “X poverty” is getting ever more absurd.
Skipping work, because you’re too poor is the most basic logic fail of all. Journos need to call people out on it.