Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

A damning attack on Truss from ConservativeHome – politicalbetting.com

2456711

Comments

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,049
    biggles said:

    eek said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    I'll quote 1 paragraph

    Households coming to the end of a fixed-term deal will soon face increases of around £5,000 a year. Before Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement last Friday analysts were expecting repayments to rise by £3,500.

    So Kwasi's statement has removed £125 a month (or 1 / 2 nights out a month) from household budgets....
    Yet more evidence that traders are a bit slow and just follow the herd, which sadly in 2022 often means Twitter plays a role too.
    Are you saying that "traders" should have taken a politician's word at face value?

    Interesting take.
  • Scott_xP said:

    A representative sample of voters were asked which one word comes to mind when you think about Liz Truss's economic policies?

    Top 5= Rich, Rubbish, Disaster, Disastrous, Cr*p
    @PeoplePolling Sep 28-29 https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1575814003708002304/photo/1


    I'm surprised they were that positive about it! 👍
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 4,069
    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
  • Scott_xP said:

    A representative sample of voters were asked which one word comes to mind when you think about Liz Truss's economic policies?

    Top 5= Rich, Rubbish, Disaster, Disastrous, Cr*p
    @PeoplePolling Sep 28-29 https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1575814003708002304/photo/1


    If you read from left to right across the middle I rather like the phrase “Disastrous rich c**p s**t”.

  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,225

    On the positive side, given how clogged up the courts are, I wouldn't expect to see any speedy repossession hearings.

    Some banks going under then?
  • Pro_Rata said:

    @eek

    Out of interest, which are the two seats the Conservatives keep in a scenario where Labour >50% ?

    Please don't tell me one of them is Sir Christopher Chope. :(

    Have you failed to back him as next Tory leader?
    That truly made me smile! Thanks Alph.
    It's surely academic, and an artefact of the separate calculation, but the two surviving on the YouGov Electoral Calculus prediction are the D&G pair of Mundell and Lamont.
    Scots! Well, I never....
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    AlistairM said:

    Leon said:

    All this Truss Budget bollocks, however serious, is being utterly overshadowed by what Putin is right now saying in Moscow



    PUTIN: THERE ARE FOUR NEW REGIONS OF RUSSIA

    PUTIN: WE CALL ON KYIV TO IMMEDIATELY STOP MILITARY ACTIONS AND RETURN TO NEGOTIATION TABLE

    PUTIN: WE ARE READY FOR TALKS


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575824762387021826?s=20&t=aGA_ZNARoL32Nj4prs2uNQ


    Exactly as predicted. Unfortunately

    I saw some of the video. The faces in the audience were like those at a funeral.

    Awful yes. They know what is probably coming next

    One insane man has trapped them all, and now the rest of us
  • eekeek Posts: 28,592

    Scott_xP said:

    Tory MPs are starting to ask is it possible to “Bring Back Boris”. One texts saying they now have their eyes very much on the next election: “We will do whatever it takes to win. He is the best communicator we have.”
    https://twitter.com/HannahAlOthman/status/1575752730202714115

    I honestly can't see any way back for Truss. The narrative of reckless incompetence is embedded so she will get the blame for all mortgage rises even though some rise in rates are absolutely inevitable. She is also a very poor media performer - she can't think on her feet or project empathy and she is also poor at set piece speeches. BoJo was partly good and partly crap (poor attention to detail) but could waffle and fib his way out of a tight corner. Makes one realise how brilliant Blair was on the communication front.

    I think the severity of the reaction will force Tory hands so a change in leader is likely which may well close the gap with Labour. If Truss continues or her replacement is a poor choice it gets very interesting - but I would expect a LD revival. There is a lot of anti-Labour sentiment and there must be many millions who are very negative about both main parties.
    There may be a lot of anti-labour sentiment but the reality is the anti-Tory sentiment is going to trump that.

    My viewpoint is that people vote for the least worst party that has a chance of winning which means that Labour and the Lib Dems probably need to be very clear as to who is going to win the seats the Lib Dems wish to target to avoid confusion..

    Because few people are going to vote Tory once they see their monthly mortgage repayment...
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
    He looks more unstable than I’ve ever seen

    FFS someone push him out the window. It is 2 minutes to midnight
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,199
    edited September 2022
    TOPPING said:

    biggles said:

    eek said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    I'll quote 1 paragraph

    Households coming to the end of a fixed-term deal will soon face increases of around £5,000 a year. Before Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement last Friday analysts were expecting repayments to rise by £3,500.

    So Kwasi's statement has removed £125 a month (or 1 / 2 nights out a month) from household budgets....
    Yet more evidence that traders are a bit slow and just follow the herd, which sadly in 2022 often means Twitter plays a role too.
    Are you saying that "traders" should have taken a politician's word at face value?

    Interesting take.
    No. Can’t you read? Which word are you struggling with?

    Edit - just seen you clipped why I wrote to wilfully misrepresent it. Twat.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,592

    There are two opposing impossibilities:

    1. The removal of Liz Truss after half an hour in the job. There are so many reasons why even contemplating her removal is politically insane - that we are openly discussing how it could happen shows how far into political unreality we have travelled
    2. The continuation of the "this is fine" messaging around the "stay the course" economic plan. The -33% poll looks to be an outlier until we then get -20, -21 and even -30 polls to accompany it

    Neither impossibility looks set to back down. Truss and her cabal are wedded to their plan and apparently don't care about either the political impact or the market reaction. The market absolutely doesn't accept what they are saying or the "wait til late November timing or the proven lie about the OBR.

    And voters? From what I am seeing and hearing the reaction against their plan is visceral and widespread. Whats more after a disastrous media shitshow yesterday, we go into Tory conference. Where the masters of the universe will show just how out of touch with reality they are and how incapable they are of emoting.

    However impossible and political insane point 1 is, I can't see how the alternative isn't more impossible. By the end of conference it will clear to anyone outside her cabal that they have to be forcibly removed from the controls.

    Fun times ahead for students of politics!

    I think every polling firm except for 1 has done a poll over the past few days. And all have the Tories at least 20 points behind Labour....
  • We should annex Kaliningrad today.

    Followed by a referendum in which 98% of the inhabitants vote to be part of the UK.
    The way things are going we might not even have to rig the vote.
  • AlistairMAlistairM Posts: 2,005
    edited September 2022
    AlistairM said:

    Leon said:

    All this Truss Budget bollocks, however serious, is being utterly overshadowed by what Putin is right now saying in Moscow



    PUTIN: THERE ARE FOUR NEW REGIONS OF RUSSIA

    PUTIN: WE CALL ON KYIV TO IMMEDIATELY STOP MILITARY ACTIONS AND RETURN TO NEGOTIATION TABLE

    PUTIN: WE ARE READY FOR TALKS


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575824762387021826?s=20&t=aGA_ZNARoL32Nj4prs2uNQ


    Exactly as predicted. Unfortunately

    I saw some of the video. The faces in the audience were like those at a funeral.


    Every new angle has more miserable faces.


  • darkage said:

    Leon said:

    "This may seem weird, but I'm OK with that:

    I think the most important investment question for the next 6 months is "does Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?".

    I'm concerned the odds are up to maybe 35% likely, & rising.

    Where do you come out?"

    https://twitter.com/GaryHaubold/status/1575818826402263040?s=20&t=uvrhpasizW4QbkYJr3P_tQ

    The likelihood is surely quite high because, as I recall, their military doctrine is that they can use it to defend Russia, which they have now of course extended by way of this annexation. The whole thing looks like a path to using a battlefield nuke. Maybe that is what he wants us to think. But he is running out of other options. His conventional forces are failing and the conscript army is going to be wiped out.

    Sadly this is part of the inherent dangers of trying to 'beat back Putin'. There was some wisdom in this idea that we should 'give Putin an off ramp'. The useful opposition to Putin is of a small size and they are all trying to flee the country to avoid military service, they aren't going to rise up.

    If Putin uses a battlefield nuke, how exactly do we 'beat back Russia' then? I truly don't think there is any good answer to that.
    NATO can very rapidly obliterate any ability for Russia to launch battlefield nukes. That would leave him with his strategic nuclear deterrence, to deter any attempt to occupy Russian territory within its internationally recognised borders.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,131
    DavidL said:

    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "This may seem weird, but I'm OK with that:

    I think the most important investment question for the next 6 months is "does Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?".

    I'm concerned the odds are up to maybe 35% likely, & rising.

    Where do you come out?"

    https://twitter.com/GaryHaubold/status/1575818826402263040?s=20&t=uvrhpasizW4QbkYJr3P_tQ

    iirc I predicted on here a few months ago that v sadly he would use a battlefield nuke in late summer. So I was wrong. We can only hope that I was completely wrong rather than just out by a month or two.

    Bleak times.
    I reckon this market analyst is actually understating the chances. More like 50-60%. Dropping a small nuke is an incredible risk for Putin - but the alternatives are equally dismal, and probably less likely to save him short term. He cannot afford to lose, and he is losing

    Everything points to him getting desperate. eg now mobilising in Moscow. A massive red warning sign

    Bleak indeed. The best outcome now - BEST - is maybe the war grinds on over winter, we have a horrible economic crisis - around the world - economies lurch into steep recession, million lose jobs, poor countries tip into civil strife, but then the war fades away in spring - somehow - fuel prices drop, economies pick up, we return slowly to something like normal: but quite a lot poorer

    And yet I see the future being worse. The number of grave systemic threats to the world as we know it are too many and too fearsome. It is hard not to despair, or get completely laughingly drunk all the time*

    *I don't actually do this, but I might start now




    Im seeing lots of rolled eyes in the audience for vlads speech
    Heads, surely? Ed
    FWIW there is growing sense among people who deal with Russia on a daily basis that if this (frankly laughable) attempt to annex territory they don´t control does not stop the war within a few weeks, then Putin will be put through a window.

    Any use of even a "tactical nuke" would speed up his exit to hours or days rather than weeks.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
  • AlistairM said:

    AlistairM said:

    Leon said:

    All this Truss Budget bollocks, however serious, is being utterly overshadowed by what Putin is right now saying in Moscow



    PUTIN: THERE ARE FOUR NEW REGIONS OF RUSSIA

    PUTIN: WE CALL ON KYIV TO IMMEDIATELY STOP MILITARY ACTIONS AND RETURN TO NEGOTIATION TABLE

    PUTIN: WE ARE READY FOR TALKS


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575824762387021826?s=20&t=aGA_ZNARoL32Nj4prs2uNQ


    Exactly as predicted. Unfortunately

    I saw some of the video. The faces in the audience were like those at a funeral.


    Every new angle has more miserable faces.


    Wish one of them had a gun…
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,779

    Scott_xP said:

    A representative sample of voters were asked which one word comes to mind when you think about Liz Truss's economic policies?

    Top 5= Rich, Rubbish, Disaster, Disastrous, Cr*p
    @PeoplePolling Sep 28-29 https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1575814003708002304/photo/1


    If you read from left to right across the middle I rather like the phrase “Disastrous rich c**p s**t”.

    A bit further down you can see "chaotic c**t gamble".
  • DavidL said:

    maxh said:

    DavidL said:

    Ok. So what do we do?

    1 Reverse both the 45% and CT cuts.
    2. Cancel the gas cap nonsense: we can’t afford it.
    3. Increase benefits by enough to keep poor people warm.
    4. Boost investment by super reliefs on capital spend and training.
    5. Encourage the Bank to catch up with interest rates to secure pound and reduce imported inflation.
    6. Accelerate domestic energy production by all means possible.
    7. Increase VAT
    8. Combine IT and NI so we all pay the same taxes on earnings and other income.
    9. Offer those working in the public sector wage increases equivalent to inflation.
    10. Increase instead of decreasing government capital spending.

    That’s my starter for 10. Tough times, tough measures.

    Feels like a good list. To me only 2 is politically very difficult to do (in general, not talking about this govt, politically they're utterly f***ed).

    I wonder what the combined affordability of all this would be, though? I'd add a condition that the combined 10 need to regain the confidence of the markets. Would these? I hope so but unsure.
    That's why I had the VAT in there. Deficit reduction is a must or the markets are going to crucify us.
    I have a lefty's instinctive aversion to increasing VAT, but given the need to rebalance the economy away from consumption of imported goods it is perhaps a necessary evil.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045
    AlistairM said:

    AlistairM said:

    Leon said:

    All this Truss Budget bollocks, however serious, is being utterly overshadowed by what Putin is right now saying in Moscow



    PUTIN: THERE ARE FOUR NEW REGIONS OF RUSSIA

    PUTIN: WE CALL ON KYIV TO IMMEDIATELY STOP MILITARY ACTIONS AND RETURN TO NEGOTIATION TABLE

    PUTIN: WE ARE READY FOR TALKS


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575824762387021826?s=20&t=aGA_ZNARoL32Nj4prs2uNQ


    Exactly as predicted. Unfortunately

    I saw some of the video. The faces in the audience were like those at a funeral.


    Every new angle has more miserable faces.


    Reminds me of scenes in 1984. The minute of hate approaches.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606

    darkage said:

    Leon said:

    "This may seem weird, but I'm OK with that:

    I think the most important investment question for the next 6 months is "does Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?".

    I'm concerned the odds are up to maybe 35% likely, & rising.

    Where do you come out?"

    https://twitter.com/GaryHaubold/status/1575818826402263040?s=20&t=uvrhpasizW4QbkYJr3P_tQ

    The likelihood is surely quite high because, as I recall, their military doctrine is that they can use it to defend Russia, which they have now of course extended by way of this annexation. The whole thing looks like a path to using a battlefield nuke. Maybe that is what he wants us to think. But he is running out of other options. His conventional forces are failing and the conscript army is going to be wiped out.

    Sadly this is part of the inherent dangers of trying to 'beat back Putin'. There was some wisdom in this idea that we should 'give Putin an off ramp'. The useful opposition to Putin is of a small size and they are all trying to flee the country to avoid military service, they aren't going to rise up.

    If Putin uses a battlefield nuke, how exactly do we 'beat back Russia' then? I truly don't think there is any good answer to that.
    NATO can very rapidly obliterate any ability for Russia to launch battlefield nukes. That would leave him with his strategic nuclear deterrence, to deter any attempt to occupy Russian territory within its internationally recognised borders.
    So your idea is NATO should pre-emptively attack Russia? Brilliant. Can’t see any problem with that
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,184

    IDS never got put to the voters.

    There is a precedent for the Tories realising the members have made a howler...

    The MPs should never have put Truss to the members - it could so easily have been Mordaunt and Sunak. Or even Badenoch, (although her inexperience probably would have made her risky in different ways).
  • eekeek Posts: 28,592
    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    If you read the article there are £1500 reasons for her to go....
  • Another thought.

    The last two Conservative leaders have got there by being the candidate of the Eurosceptic Right. Neither of them was really of that wing of the party, and they have both been disasters in ways that were obvious beforehand to anyone who was paying attention.

    So, why have we not had a full-on ERG candidate winning, and why are they so awful at putting their weight behind someone not obviously terrible?
  • Chris said:

    Scott_xP said:

    A representative sample of voters were asked which one word comes to mind when you think about Liz Truss's economic policies?

    Top 5= Rich, Rubbish, Disaster, Disastrous, Cr*p
    @PeoplePolling Sep 28-29 https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1575814003708002304/photo/1


    If you read from left to right across the middle I rather like the phrase “Disastrous rich c**p s**t”.

    A bit further down you can see "chaotic c**t gamble".
    One of The Fall's finest choons.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    I think we should unilaterally attack China as well. Might as well get ail the housework done in one go
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,049
    biggles said:

    TOPPING said:

    biggles said:

    eek said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    I'll quote 1 paragraph

    Households coming to the end of a fixed-term deal will soon face increases of around £5,000 a year. Before Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement last Friday analysts were expecting repayments to rise by £3,500.

    So Kwasi's statement has removed £125 a month (or 1 / 2 nights out a month) from household budgets....
    Yet more evidence that traders are a bit slow and just follow the herd, which sadly in 2022 often means Twitter plays a role too.
    Are you saying that "traders" should have taken a politician's word at face value?

    Interesting take.
    No. Can’t you read? Which word are you struggling with?

    Edit - just seen you clipped why I wrote to wilfully misrepresent it. Twat.
    You wrote this, arsehole:

    "Why are people pretending that increased interest rates are a surprise? They were actively discussed during her election, even by her own advisers and should have been priced in.

    Yet more evidence that traders are a bit slow and just follow the herd, which sadly in 2022 often means Twitter plays a role too."


    Which bit have I misrepresented. Dickhead.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,957
    When Ben Wallace said that Putin had gone "full tonto" he was right. It might not have been diplomatic to say so anywhere that it might get reported, but he was absolutely correct about the scale of Putin's delusion.

    Let's hope some US black programme is about to end Putin in a deniable fashion.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,779
    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
    He looks more unstable than I’ve ever seen
    Even in the mirror??
  • AlistairM said:

    Putin has made his speech to bring the 4 regions into Russia. However he now calls on Ukraine to now negotiate but those 4 regions are non-negotiable. This is what he thought was his get out - keep those 4 regions and spin it as a victory despite the catastrophic losses.

    Ukraine will obviously not negotiate and why should they. So now what happens?

    It will be interesting to see if China responds at all. Will they back the call for negotiations, or make more of a point of not recognising the annexations?

    Now would be a great time to announce that the first squadron of Ukrainian F-16s were ready to be deployed.
  • DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    People do not expect the government to underwrite their mortgages. They do expect the government not to act in such an irresponsible manner that mortgage rates are forced up in response.

    A significant problem now is that lenders do not know how to price products. They know there is significant and increasing downside risk from this government but they can't see how much - and the 2 month delay until the next budget event only makes that worse.
  • Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    You have linked via a loony right wing site to get to Sky News.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Does Poots include Lyman in this annexation announcement?
  • stjohnstjohn Posts: 1,889

    tlg86 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    On topic.

    ***Buffs nails***

    I did tell you she was shite and wouldn't make it to conference 2023.

    The only examples I can find of PMs toppled after they took the reins from another PM of the same party and didn't make it through to the next GE are George Canning (Who died) and the Viscount Goderich (Who invited loads of opposition into his cabinet).
    Are there any more ?
    I'm betting against it happening with Truss. She might dispose of Kwarteng at some point, but he too is safe this year I believe.
    Neville Chamberlain.
    Maybe Dave Davis can do his (admittedly pretty rubbish) 'In the name of God, go' schtick?
    "Your joking! Not another one!"
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,756
    biggles said:

    TOPPING said:

    biggles said:

    eek said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    I'll quote 1 paragraph

    Households coming to the end of a fixed-term deal will soon face increases of around £5,000 a year. Before Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement last Friday analysts were expecting repayments to rise by £3,500.

    So Kwasi's statement has removed £125 a month (or 1 / 2 nights out a month) from household budgets....
    Yet more evidence that traders are a bit slow and just follow the herd, which sadly in 2022 often means Twitter plays a role too.
    Are you saying that "traders" should have taken a politician's word at face value?

    Interesting take.
    No. Can’t you read? Which word are you struggling with?

    Edit - just seen you clipped why I wrote to wilfully misrepresent it. Twat.
    He does that sometimes. Just chill and be the better man.
  • DavidL said:

    Ok. So what do we do?

    1 Reverse both the 45% and CT cuts.
    2. Cancel the gas cap nonsense: we can’t afford it.
    3. Increase benefits by enough to keep poor people warm.
    4. Boost investment by super reliefs on capital spend and training.
    5. Encourage the Bank to catch up with interest rates to secure pound and reduce imported inflation.
    6. Accelerate domestic energy production by all means possible.
    7. Increase VAT
    8. Combine IT and NI so we all pay the same taxes on earnings and other income.
    9. Offer those working in the public sector wage increases equivalent to inflation.
    10. Increase instead of decreasing government capital spending.

    That’s my starter for 10. Tough times, tough measures.

    I'd vote for you David on that platform. 👍
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045
    Cicero said:

    DavidL said:

    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "This may seem weird, but I'm OK with that:

    I think the most important investment question for the next 6 months is "does Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?".

    I'm concerned the odds are up to maybe 35% likely, & rising.

    Where do you come out?"

    https://twitter.com/GaryHaubold/status/1575818826402263040?s=20&t=uvrhpasizW4QbkYJr3P_tQ

    iirc I predicted on here a few months ago that v sadly he would use a battlefield nuke in late summer. So I was wrong. We can only hope that I was completely wrong rather than just out by a month or two.

    Bleak times.
    I reckon this market analyst is actually understating the chances. More like 50-60%. Dropping a small nuke is an incredible risk for Putin - but the alternatives are equally dismal, and probably less likely to save him short term. He cannot afford to lose, and he is losing

    Everything points to him getting desperate. eg now mobilising in Moscow. A massive red warning sign

    Bleak indeed. The best outcome now - BEST - is maybe the war grinds on over winter, we have a horrible economic crisis - around the world - economies lurch into steep recession, million lose jobs, poor countries tip into civil strife, but then the war fades away in spring - somehow - fuel prices drop, economies pick up, we return slowly to something like normal: but quite a lot poorer

    And yet I see the future being worse. The number of grave systemic threats to the world as we know it are too many and too fearsome. It is hard not to despair, or get completely laughingly drunk all the time*

    *I don't actually do this, but I might start now




    Im seeing lots of rolled eyes in the audience for vlads speech
    Heads, surely? Ed
    FWIW there is growing sense among people who deal with Russia on a daily basis that if this (frankly laughable) attempt to annex territory they don´t control does not stop the war within a few weeks, then Putin will be put through a window.

    Any use of even a "tactical nuke" would speed up his exit to hours or days rather than weeks.
    We can only pray that even the expressed intention of using a tactical nuke would be his death sentence.
  • novanova Posts: 701
    kinabalu said:

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Lead slashed from 33 to 30 in the space of 24 hours. That's a bit worrying for Labour. Crossover coming?
    From polls averaging 25% lead for the Tories, to polls averaging a 25% lead for Labour in 30 months.

    Even the "shy Tory" polling turnaround under Kinnock wasn't that big.
  • Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Leon said:

    "This may seem weird, but I'm OK with that:

    I think the most important investment question for the next 6 months is "does Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?".

    I'm concerned the odds are up to maybe 35% likely, & rising.

    Where do you come out?"

    https://twitter.com/GaryHaubold/status/1575818826402263040?s=20&t=uvrhpasizW4QbkYJr3P_tQ

    The likelihood is surely quite high because, as I recall, their military doctrine is that they can use it to defend Russia, which they have now of course extended by way of this annexation. The whole thing looks like a path to using a battlefield nuke. Maybe that is what he wants us to think. But he is running out of other options. His conventional forces are failing and the conscript army is going to be wiped out.

    Sadly this is part of the inherent dangers of trying to 'beat back Putin'. There was some wisdom in this idea that we should 'give Putin an off ramp'. The useful opposition to Putin is of a small size and they are all trying to flee the country to avoid military service, they aren't going to rise up.

    If Putin uses a battlefield nuke, how exactly do we 'beat back Russia' then? I truly don't think there is any good answer to that.
    NATO can very rapidly obliterate any ability for Russia to launch battlefield nukes. That would leave him with his strategic nuclear deterrence, to deter any attempt to occupy Russian territory within its internationally recognised borders.
    So your idea is NATO should pre-emptively attack Russia? Brilliant. Can’t see any problem with that
    It'd be easy. We'd be guaranteed to get every single one of the tactical warheads, and old Vald would be fine with NATO air power sweeping across his borders and obliterating his troops and munitions.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    edited September 2022
    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
  • Not sure if anybody's mentioned it, but I do wonder whether the financial chaos may also be exacerbated by a lot of people struggling to meet the monthly payments on the cars they're buying, and defaulting on their loans/contracts.

    I'm surveying the local streets in the expectation (hope) of a downturn in the visibility of Chelsea tractors.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045
    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    If you read the article there are £1500 reasons for her to go....
    What, the PM should go because mortgage rates go up 1%. I mean, are you serious?
  • WillGWillG Posts: 2,366
    Putin openly saying they are fighting for "great historic Russia". This is why the West cannot give into nuclear blackmail. If we accept it with Ukraine, he will do the same with Belarus, with Kazakhstan, with the Baltics, with Poland. He must lose and be seen to lose.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    Chechen warlord Kadyrov appears to cry during Putin’s speech

    https://twitter.com/tpyxanews/status/1575828398513197061?s=46&t=QJuJi3i2InYi7HVRCxyY9w

    Is that good or bad? I’m going with bad. Because this is 2022
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 4,069
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/28/world/europe/russian-soldiers-phone-calls-ukraine.html?campaign_id=190

    "‘Putin Is a Fool’: Intercepted Calls Reveal Russian Army in Disarray

    In phone calls to friends and relatives at home, Russian soldiers gave damning insider accounts of battlefield failures and civilian executions, excoriating their leaders just weeks into the campaign to take Kyiv.

    Yevgeniy: We are positioned in Bucha town.

    Sergey: Our offense has stalled. We’re losing this war.

    Andrey: Half of our regiment is gone.

    Sergey: We were given an order to kill everyone we see.

    ...

    Sergey to girlfriend: They told us that, where we’re going, there’s a lot of civilians walking around. And they gave us the order to kill everyone we see.

    Why the f**k?

    Because they might give away our positions. … That’s what we’re f**king going to do, it seems. Kill any civilian that walks by and drag them into the forest. … I’ve already become a murderer. That’s why I don’t want to kill any more people, especially ones I will have to look in the eyes."
  • WillGWillG Posts: 2,366
    Even the applause is slow. Look at the faces. Not one of them in the crowd there believes this will work.
  • eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045

    DavidL said:

    maxh said:

    DavidL said:

    Ok. So what do we do?

    1 Reverse both the 45% and CT cuts.
    2. Cancel the gas cap nonsense: we can’t afford it.
    3. Increase benefits by enough to keep poor people warm.
    4. Boost investment by super reliefs on capital spend and training.
    5. Encourage the Bank to catch up with interest rates to secure pound and reduce imported inflation.
    6. Accelerate domestic energy production by all means possible.
    7. Increase VAT
    8. Combine IT and NI so we all pay the same taxes on earnings and other income.
    9. Offer those working in the public sector wage increases equivalent to inflation.
    10. Increase instead of decreasing government capital spending.

    That’s my starter for 10. Tough times, tough measures.

    Feels like a good list. To me only 2 is politically very difficult to do (in general, not talking about this govt, politically they're utterly f***ed).

    I wonder what the combined affordability of all this would be, though? I'd add a condition that the combined 10 need to regain the confidence of the markets. Would these? I hope so but unsure.
    That's why I had the VAT in there. Deficit reduction is a must or the markets are going to crucify us.
    I have a lefty's instinctive aversion to increasing VAT, but given the need to rebalance the economy away from consumption of imported goods it is perhaps a necessary evil.
    I think that we should look to zero rate things to reduce the regression. Fule certainly. Maybe hot food?

    It would give George something to laugh about.
  • Bad News! Manchester United report that Harry Maguire has come back from international duties with an injury which will keep him out of action against Citeh on Sunday.

    How awful! He was such an integral part of our defence, the first pick on the team sheet every game this season...
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Scott_xP said:

    A representative sample of voters were asked which one word comes to mind when you think about Liz Truss's economic policies?

    Top 5= Rich, Rubbish, Disaster, Disastrous, Cr*p
    @PeoplePolling Sep 28-29 https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1575814003708002304/photo/1


    There's a LOT of swear words in that.
    Don't think I've seen so many in one of these.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,957
    WillG said:

    Even the applause is slow. Look at the faces. Not one of them in the crowd there believes this will work.

    Remember that meeting with Putin and the Security Council two days before the invasion? They all looked worried, they knew that the boss has lots his marbles.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    DavidL said:

    Cicero said:

    DavidL said:

    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    "This may seem weird, but I'm OK with that:

    I think the most important investment question for the next 6 months is "does Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine?".

    I'm concerned the odds are up to maybe 35% likely, & rising.

    Where do you come out?"

    https://twitter.com/GaryHaubold/status/1575818826402263040?s=20&t=uvrhpasizW4QbkYJr3P_tQ

    iirc I predicted on here a few months ago that v sadly he would use a battlefield nuke in late summer. So I was wrong. We can only hope that I was completely wrong rather than just out by a month or two.

    Bleak times.
    I reckon this market analyst is actually understating the chances. More like 50-60%. Dropping a small nuke is an incredible risk for Putin - but the alternatives are equally dismal, and probably less likely to save him short term. He cannot afford to lose, and he is losing

    Everything points to him getting desperate. eg now mobilising in Moscow. A massive red warning sign

    Bleak indeed. The best outcome now - BEST - is maybe the war grinds on over winter, we have a horrible economic crisis - around the world - economies lurch into steep recession, million lose jobs, poor countries tip into civil strife, but then the war fades away in spring - somehow - fuel prices drop, economies pick up, we return slowly to something like normal: but quite a lot poorer

    And yet I see the future being worse. The number of grave systemic threats to the world as we know it are too many and too fearsome. It is hard not to despair, or get completely laughingly drunk all the time*

    *I don't actually do this, but I might start now




    Im seeing lots of rolled eyes in the audience for vlads speech
    Heads, surely? Ed
    FWIW there is growing sense among people who deal with Russia on a daily basis that if this (frankly laughable) attempt to annex territory they don´t control does not stop the war within a few weeks, then Putin will be put through a window.

    Any use of even a "tactical nuke" would speed up his exit to hours or days rather than weeks.
    We can only pray that even the expressed intention of using a tactical nuke would be his death sentence.
    Like everyone i am heartily sick of this war now...even with ukraine winning the cost is enormous
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,422
    No problems with the pen for Putin.
  • Leon said:

    AlistairM said:

    Leon said:

    All this Truss Budget bollocks, however serious, is being utterly overshadowed by what Putin is right now saying in Moscow



    PUTIN: THERE ARE FOUR NEW REGIONS OF RUSSIA

    PUTIN: WE CALL ON KYIV TO IMMEDIATELY STOP MILITARY ACTIONS AND RETURN TO NEGOTIATION TABLE

    PUTIN: WE ARE READY FOR TALKS


    https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1575824762387021826?s=20&t=aGA_ZNARoL32Nj4prs2uNQ


    Exactly as predicted. Unfortunately

    I saw some of the video. The faces in the audience were like those at a funeral.

    Awful yes. They know what is probably coming next

    One insane man has trapped them all, and now the rest of us
    It's a perfect opportunity for them to start a slow hand clap and bring an end to this disaster.
  • From BBC: Putin “criticised capitalism, saying this was not the way to provide food for the people.”

    Wha….?
  • WillGWillG Posts: 2,366
    Putin standing next to people and shaking hands. What happened to his COVID paranoia?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,592
    DavidL said:

    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    If you read the article there are £1500 reasons for her to go....
    What, the PM should go because mortgage rates go up 1%. I mean, are you serious?
    The PM managed to create a scenario where base rates that were expected to hit 5% are now going to hit 7%.

    That is something that she will be blamed for
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,184

    nico679 said:

    The Tories could recover significantly if they do dump Truss . Sunak looks even better after his forecasts came true so the public might think he knows what he’s talking about .

    Of course there will be the issue that the Tories have yet another new leader but how much will the public factor that into their vote?

    It would make the Tories look utterly dysfunctional but it’s their best chance now of preventing disaster at the next GE (which they will still lose - the question is now the scale).

    Better to cut off the arm than risk the contagion spreading. Keeping Liz will just make things worse. She’s been tested and she’s just not up to the job. She’s actively making things more difficult every day.
    They could bring back Mrs May - her track record of defying the opinion polls might be just what they need?
  • Not sure if anybody's mentioned it, but I do wonder whether the financial chaos may also be exacerbated by a lot of people struggling to meet the monthly payments on the cars they're buying, and defaulting on their loans/contracts.

    I'm surveying the local streets in the expectation (hope) of a downturn in the visibility of Chelsea tractors.

    Last time we had a big financial crisis there was a major threat to the car company finances in the UK. The sheer number of vehicles on PCP deals being handed back which then couldn't easily be sold on was a big problem.

    If we start seeing a spike in voluntary terminations on such deals, we know the balloon is going up.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,422
    Arf Putin really is quite short. All the 4 err 'governors' taller than him.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    've watched a lot of Putin speeches over the last 10-15 years and this is the most anti-US one by a really long way.

    If I were a western policymaker wondering if he'd really use nuclear weapons – and he hasn't even got to them yet – I'd be very concerned.

    https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1575829807593533441?s=46&t=QJuJi3i2InYi7HVRCxyY9w

    In case you had any doubt what this is really about, Putin hasn't even mentioned Ukraine for about 15 minutes now. This is effectively an official declaration of hostilities against the west.“
  • AlistairMAlistairM Posts: 2,005

    Bad News! Manchester United report that Harry Maguire has come back from international duties with an injury which will keep him out of action against Citeh on Sunday.

    How awful! He was such an integral part of our defence, the first pick on the team sheet every game this season...

    It would be very unfortunate if the injury kept him out until Christmas.
  • ohnotnow said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/28/world/europe/russian-soldiers-phone-calls-ukraine.html?campaign_id=190

    "‘Putin Is a Fool’: Intercepted Calls Reveal Russian Army in Disarray

    In phone calls to friends and relatives at home, Russian soldiers gave damning insider accounts of battlefield failures and civilian executions, excoriating their leaders just weeks into the campaign to take Kyiv.

    Yevgeniy: We are positioned in Bucha town.

    Sergey: Our offense has stalled. We’re losing this war.

    Andrey: Half of our regiment is gone.

    Sergey: We were given an order to kill everyone we see.

    ...

    Sergey to girlfriend: They told us that, where we’re going, there’s a lot of civilians walking around. And they gave us the order to kill everyone we see.

    Why the f**k?

    Because they might give away our positions. … That’s what we’re f**king going to do, it seems. Kill any civilian that walks by and drag them into the forest. … I’ve already become a murderer. That’s why I don’t want to kill any more people, especially ones I will have to look in the eyes."

    Putins got a good chance of being seen as one of the most evil persons ever in history after this.

    This is Hitler and Stalin level stuff.
  • eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    The Ruth Davidson Says No Party commemorative service:

    - no flowers at the funeral;
    - and don’t give the Chancellor any cocaine just before he enters the church.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 4,069
    The hand-holding, singing and clapping at the end of Putin's speech felt a bit 'Yeltsin', I must say.
  • WillG said:

    Putin standing next to people and shaking hands. What happened to his COVID paranoia?

    He is (supposedly) dying of bum cancer. He's not worried about Covid any more as he's a dead man anyway.
  • After reading this header, I nipped to ConHome for a quick read. I think the Tories are in for an interesting conference.

    I wonder will they try to close ranks, or will they indulge in close-quarters combat?
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,061
    eek said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Tory MPs are starting to ask is it possible to “Bring Back Boris”. One texts saying they now have their eyes very much on the next election: “We will do whatever it takes to win. He is the best communicator we have.”
    https://twitter.com/HannahAlOthman/status/1575752730202714115

    I honestly can't see any way back for Truss. The narrative of reckless incompetence is embedded so she will get the blame for all mortgage rises even though some rise in rates are absolutely inevitable. She is also a very poor media performer - she can't think on her feet or project empathy and she is also poor at set piece speeches. BoJo was partly good and partly crap (poor attention to detail) but could waffle and fib his way out of a tight corner. Makes one realise how brilliant Blair was on the communication front.

    I think the severity of the reaction will force Tory hands so a change in leader is likely which may well close the gap with Labour. If Truss continues or her replacement is a poor choice it gets very interesting - but I would expect a LD revival. There is a lot of anti-Labour sentiment and there must be many millions who are very negative about both main parties.
    There may be a lot of anti-labour sentiment but the reality is the anti-Tory sentiment is going to trump that.

    My viewpoint is that people vote for the least worst party that has a chance of winning which means that Labour and the Lib Dems probably need to be very clear as to who is going to win the seats the Lib Dems wish to target to avoid confusion..

    Because few people are going to vote Tory once they see their monthly mortgage repayment...
    What about the other two-thirds of adults?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,606
    This is legit terrifying now
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
    He looks more unstable than I’ve ever seen

    FFS someone push him out the window. It is 2 minutes to midnight
    But who replaces him...might be someone worse
  • WillGWillG Posts: 2,366
    Pulpstar said:

    Arf Putin really is quite short. All the 4 err 'governors' taller than him.

    This whole catastrophe comes out of one man's Napoleon complex.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,957

    WillG said:

    Putin standing next to people and shaking hands. What happened to his COVID paranoia?

    He is (supposedly) dying of bum cancer. He's not worried about Covid any more as he's a dead man anyway.
    It would be nice if he could die a bit quicker. Sometime this afternoon would suit me.
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    There are videos of her from the election debates calling Sunak's suggestion that increased borrowing would result in rising interest rates 'project fear'.

  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302
    Leon said:

    This is legit terrifying now

    Ever see the move the stand where there is a vision of a future president stillson going completely mad
    His final words
    "The missiles are flying halleluhah"
  • AlistairM said:

    Bad News! Manchester United report that Harry Maguire has come back from international duties with an injury which will keep him out of action against Citeh on Sunday.

    How awful! He was such an integral part of our defence, the first pick on the team sheet every game this season...

    It would be very unfortunate if the injury kept him out until Christmas.
    Awful! Imagine if he has already played his last game in red?

    Tragic.
  • WillGWillG Posts: 2,366
    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
    He looks more unstable than I’ve ever seen

    FFS someone push him out the window. It is 2 minutes to midnight
    But who replaces him...might be someone worse
    When Putin is replaced, the elite will be desperate to release sanctions. They need it for financial survival and to restore their army. They will appoint someone amenable.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,422
    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
    He looks more unstable than I’ve ever seen

    FFS someone push him out the window. It is 2 minutes to midnight
    But who replaces him...might be someone worse
    Liz Truss
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    WillG said:

    Putin openly saying they are fighting for "great historic Russia". This is why the West cannot give into nuclear blackmail. If we accept it with Ukraine, he will do the same with Belarus, with Kazakhstan, with the Baltics, with Poland. He must lose and be seen to lose.

    He is not looking like he is in the ascendancy, in perhaps the way that Hitler was in advance of WW2.
  • novanova Posts: 701

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    There has been a lot of talk about Tory > Labour movement recently, but there are still a LOT of don't knows in the 2019 Tory voter column and they're driving the huge leads.

    In total, of the 2019 Tories, 17% say Labour, 38% still Tory, but a ridiculous 29% saying Don't Know.

    Of Labour 2019 voters the comparable figure is 7%, so it'll be interesting to see whether the Don't Knows will get over their shock and move back to the Tories. I suspect so, and it's one reason why we don't get 30pt leads in actual elections.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045

    Bad News! Manchester United report that Harry Maguire has come back from international duties with an injury which will keep him out of action against Citeh on Sunday.

    How awful! He was such an integral part of our defence, the first pick on the team sheet every game this season...

    To be honest if I was a centre half nominated to stop Haaland from scoring I just might have an injury too.
  • PeterMPeterM Posts: 302

    ohnotnow said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/28/world/europe/russian-soldiers-phone-calls-ukraine.html?campaign_id=190

    "‘Putin Is a Fool’: Intercepted Calls Reveal Russian Army in Disarray

    In phone calls to friends and relatives at home, Russian soldiers gave damning insider accounts of battlefield failures and civilian executions, excoriating their leaders just weeks into the campaign to take Kyiv.

    Yevgeniy: We are positioned in Bucha town.

    Sergey: Our offense has stalled. We’re losing this war.

    Andrey: Half of our regiment is gone.

    Sergey: We were given an order to kill everyone we see.

    ...

    Sergey to girlfriend: They told us that, where we’re going, there’s a lot of civilians walking around. And they gave us the order to kill everyone we see.

    Why the f**k?

    Because they might give away our positions. … That’s what we’re f**king going to do, it seems. Kill any civilian that walks by and drag them into the forest. … I’ve already become a murderer. That’s why I don’t want to kill any more people, especially ones I will have to look in the eyes."

    Putins got a good chance of being seen as one of the most evil persons ever in history after this.

    This is Hitler and Stalin level stuff.
    Oh come on he hasnt slaughtered 6 million jews for a start
  • IcarusIcarus Posts: 994
    District Council By-election last night in Harborough.

    Lib Dems held the seat with a modest increase in vote share of 2.7% (to 45.7%) -Conservatives who came second were down 2.6% (to 30%) Labour went up 8.6% (to 19.6%)

    1,270 votes cast (30.7% turnout) of which 637 (50%) were postal votes - most of which were probably posted back to the council before the mourning period for the Queen had ended (so didn't receive much literature) and before last Friday's "Fiscal Misstatement" and the aftermath.

    Will be interesting to see council election in the next couple of weeks - I expect that they will help any Conservative MPs make up their minds about what to do next.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,473

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    The Ruth Davidson Says No Party commemorative service:

    - no flowers at the funeral;
    - and don’t give the Chancellor any cocaine just before he enters the church.
    How extraordinary. Some Labour votes must have shuffled SNP-wards - or some Tories seen the light on indy. Those figures for over-65 in another poll however were consistent with that.

    I'd like to see more proper polls though (ie for Scots voters).

  • eekeek Posts: 28,592

    Not sure if anybody's mentioned it, but I do wonder whether the financial chaos may also be exacerbated by a lot of people struggling to meet the monthly payments on the cars they're buying, and defaulting on their loans/contracts.

    I'm surveying the local streets in the expectation (hope) of a downturn in the visibility of Chelsea tractors.

    Last time we had a big financial crisis there was a major threat to the car company finances in the UK. The sheer number of vehicles on PCP deals being handed back which then couldn't easily be sold on was a big problem.

    If we start seeing a spike in voluntary terminations on such deals, we know the balloon is going up.
    There are 2 issues with PCP - the immediate one of can people continue to pay the monthly rental fees

    A secondary one of with interest rates rising what can they get when their 2 year contract ends and they need to renew or replace their current deal...
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,927
    edited September 2022
    ohnotnow said:

    The hand-holding, singing and clapping at the end of Putin's speech felt a bit 'Yeltsin', I must say.

    If only we were dealing with a mad alcoholic!
    Pulpstar said:

    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Watch Putin live. Right now. Annexing 20% of Ukraine

    Reassuringly, he looks completely mad


    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-putin-declares-annexation-eastern-ukraine

    I'm enjoying the faltering voice-over. I'd love to believe it's mimicking the real speech.

    It is a very odd speech mind you. He's just been going on about the Opium Wars as an example of the neoliberal/neocolonial 'project'. And now something about offices, or TV's ... and chemical weapons? And Europe is taking 95% of the recent grain exports from Ukraine, apparently. It's like the rambly haverings of the guy the barman advises you to avoid in the pub.
    He looks more unstable than I’ve ever seen

    FFS someone push him out the window. It is 2 minutes to midnight
    But who replaces him...might be someone worse
    Liz Truss
    What have the Russians done to deserve that?!
  • nova said:

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    There has been a lot of talk about Tory > Labour movement recently, but there are still a LOT of don't knows in the 2019 Tory voter column and they're driving the huge leads.

    In total, of the 2019 Tories, 17% say Labour, 38% still Tory, but a ridiculous 29% saying Don't Know.

    Of Labour 2019 voters the comparable figure is 7%, so it'll be interesting to see whether the Don't Knows will get over their shock and move back to the Tories. I suspect so, and it's one reason why we don't get 30pt leads in actual elections.
    I wonder if those DKs are more of an inducement to depose Truss than the dire face value figures in the polls? Wouldn't need much of a nudge (ie anyone not Truss leading the Tory party) to get these guys back on board.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 8,965
    Carnyx said:

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    The Ruth Davidson Says No Party commemorative service:

    - no flowers at the funeral;
    - and don’t give the Chancellor any cocaine just before he enters the church.
    How extraordinary. Some Labour votes must have shuffled SNP-wards - or some Tories seen the light on indy. Those figures for over-65 in another poll however were consistent with that.

    I'd like to see more proper polls though (ie for Scots voters).

    Are we doing Scottish sub-samples again? :)
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045
    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    If you read the article there are £1500 reasons for her to go....
    What, the PM should go because mortgage rates go up 1%. I mean, are you serious?
    The PM managed to create a scenario where base rates that were expected to hit 5% are now going to hit 7%.

    That is something that she will be blamed for
    Sure, she's incompetent and economically illiterate. No arguments from me on that one. But people entering long term loans must surely realise that they have no right to base rates staying at 1% indefinitely.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,473
    PeterM said:

    Leon said:

    This is legit terrifying now

    Ever see the move the stand where there is a vision of a future president stillson going completely mad
    His final words
    "The missiles are flying halleluhah"
    Never mind, you'll be glad to know, as I have jus\t discovered by chance, that aliens didn't build Woolworths:

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/jan/16/ben-goldacre-bad-science-aliens-woolworths
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,473
    Eabhal said:

    Carnyx said:

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    The Ruth Davidson Says No Party commemorative service:

    - no flowers at the funeral;
    - and don’t give the Chancellor any cocaine just before he enters the church.
    How extraordinary. Some Labour votes must have shuffled SNP-wards - or some Tories seen the light on indy. Those figures for over-65 in another poll however were consistent with that.

    I'd like to see more proper polls though (ie for Scots voters).

    Are we doing Scottish sub-samples again? :)
    I'm afraid we are standing round them poking them with a stick picked up from the ground. As my comment re proper polls implies (which was also intended to avert any threat of a ban).
  • eekeek Posts: 28,592
    DavidL said:

    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    If you read the article there are £1500 reasons for her to go....
    What, the PM should go because mortgage rates go up 1%. I mean, are you serious?
    The PM managed to create a scenario where base rates that were expected to hit 5% are now going to hit 7%.

    That is something that she will be blamed for
    Sure, she's incompetent and economically illiterate. No arguments from me on that one. But people entering long term loans must surely realise that they have no right to base rates staying at 1% indefinitely.
    A lot of people don't exactly have much choice but to buy the best property they can with the money they earn...
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,045
    darkage said:

    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    There are videos of her from the election debates calling Sunak's suggestion that increased borrowing would result in rising interest rates 'project fear'.

    10+ years of base rates of 1% or less will do that to a politican. It was yet another failure of imagination.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,957
    DavidL said:

    Sure, she's incompetent and economically illiterate. No arguments from me on that one. But people entering long term loans must surely realise that they have no right to base rates staying at 1% indefinitely.

    That always happens, even despite affordability tests far too many people still stretch their finances to the limit and essentially bet on rates never rising. It is nuts, but people keep doing it.
  • DavidL said:

    eek said:

    DavidL said:

    HSBC release statement warn mass forced house sales as mortgage rise by £6,000 ps

    Truss needs to go now

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/personal-banking/mortgages/hsbc-warns-mass-forced-sales-mortgage-costs-jump-5000-year/

    The government cannot underwrite everybody's bloody mortgage. Changes in mortgage rates are a known risk. There may be lots of reasons for her to go but this is simply not one.
    If you read the article there are £1500 reasons for her to go....
    What, the PM should go because mortgage rates go up 1%. I mean, are you serious?
    Thanks to her ill considered plans, botched announcements and cack-handed approach she will have nearly doubled mortgage rates from 2.7% to 5.5%

    If she had kept her big gob shut and let the OBR do its job then this would not be happening.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 8,965
    Carnyx said:

    Eabhal said:

    Carnyx said:

    eek said:

    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1575816156937875456

    Westminster Voting Intention:

    LAB: 50% (+10)
    CON: 20% (-8)
    LDM: 9% (-1)
    GRN: 8% (=)
    SNP: 5% (-1)

    Via
    @PeoplePolling
    , 29 Sep.
    Changes w/ 21 Sep.

    Scottish break catastrophic for the Unionists:

    SNP 56%
    SLab 25%
    Grn 6%
    SLD 5%
    SCon 3%
    Ref 2%
    oth (presumably Alba) 2%

    Total pro-independence 64%
    Total Unionists 35%
    3%!
    That. Is. A. etc
    The Ruth Davidson Says No Party commemorative service:

    - no flowers at the funeral;
    - and don’t give the Chancellor any cocaine just before he enters the church.
    How extraordinary. Some Labour votes must have shuffled SNP-wards - or some Tories seen the light on indy. Those figures for over-65 in another poll however were consistent with that.

    I'd like to see more proper polls though (ie for Scots voters).

    Are we doing Scottish sub-samples again? :)
    I'm afraid we are standing round them poking them with a stick picked up from the ground. As my comment re proper polls implies (which was also intended to avert any threat of a ban).
    It's still 200 people, to be fair. Wouldn't be surprised if there has been a huge crash in Scons.

    Weird that Lib Dems haven't gone up. Natural 2nd option for Perthshire (etc) Tories, I'd have thought.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,592
    one to set @Leon panicking

    https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/norway-strengthen-security-oil-gas-installations-2022-09-27/

    Russia is supposedly send drones over Norwegian oil rigs.
This discussion has been closed.