Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The next Tory poll lead – politicalbetting.com

135

Comments

  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 38,857

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    And my answer is even better.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 38,857
    IshmaelZ said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    One just does

    My Italian waiter has arbitrarily decided I am French and I have managed to keep up the act for so far 4 interactions with him (he is speaking English to the next table). Inexplicably pleased about this
    That's huge.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    dixiedean said:

    Taz said:

    Taz said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Carnyx said:

    Taz said:

    Carnyx said:

    ydoethur said:

    Carnyx said:

    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    This plan to get agency staff for the Railways?
    AIUI, agency staff are in short supply everywhere. And they are turning down work right now.
    So. Where do they come from?

    It shows how little they actual understand about the things they are supposedly in charge of.

    I don’t believe there is such a thing as a qualified agency signalman and even if they did exist they won’t be qualified to run anything as all signal boxes require site specific knowledge that takes time to get
    I am sure there are some non technical roles agency staff could do, but it seems a bit desperate.
    Especially as one needs a certain minimum number of signalmen, for instance, to keep the railways running. And one can't simply make them work overtime. Classic disaster trigger (e.g. a signalling engineer caused a disaster by leaving some bare wiring in a signalbox as a result of being grossly overworked).

    If I were a manager I wouldn't touch any derogation of regulations, either. That would be to accept liability for the ensuing crash.
    Shades of Abermiwl, where untrained staff accidentally allowed a train onto a section which already contained an oncoming express, with disastrous consequences.
    Quite (once I had worked out that this is the correct orthography for the location in question, which is better known in railway books by its anglicised version). But the problem remains, as with the signalling engineer incident (1988).

    This threat to bring in blacklegs is so stupid, a few managers aside, that it must be a deliberate Tory attempt to inflame the strike and get better ratings for Big Dog.
    It’s like an eighties greatest hits tour. We are already seeing pieces in big dog friendly papers about how labour MPs who support the strike have taken money from the Rail Unions.
    Seventies, soon, with the power cuts and oil crisis.
    Oh, "but the music".

    For every magic memory by the Sex Pistols and The Clash there were ten by Joe Dolce, Paper Lace, Boney M, Rick Dees with his "Disco Duck"....
    I think Rivers of Babylon is fab

    And if that doesn't give you an earworm, Rasputin

    Thinking about it they are the black Abba
    They were the epitome of disco, criticism of Boney M is not allowed! Paper Lace can fuck off though. Nottingham Forest, Billy dont be a hero, orchestra/pop twats.
    That aside, every decade has its cheese. We will no doubt look back (or rather younger bears will) and cringe at todays novelty performers however much their teeny bopper fans think they are the absolute moon and cutting edge of cool.
    Paper Lace only had the one big hit and a couple of minor ones. One of its former members wrote the opening credits music for Midlands today in the late eighties.

    Boney M had far greater longevity and knocked out some belting tunes. Their cover of ‘Painter Man’ is a banger.

    Of course famously there are currently more versions of Boney M touring than grains of sand in the world.
    They toured the USSR and had some of the best selling singles of the 70s, when it meant something.
    Legends.
    Talking of grains of sand it is estimated for every grain of sand on earth there are 10,000 stars in the universe.
    Known universe(s)....
    In some universes in our multiverse Keir, Angie and Mary Foy really were working on curry 'n beer with the lads night.#eventhemostunlikelyuniversesexist
    Could we postulate one in which Boris Johnson is hard-working, competent, honest and selflessly devoted to the welfare of the nation?
    You see thats the one that breaks the whole multiverse theory
    #oneuniverseitis
    That''s four separate universes!
    I assume you used to discreetly dispense a soothing ointment for gents with a nasty little case of oneuniverseitis.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 12,745

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    Had Johnson lost the vote last week which wasn't I think remotely likely, we'd be in a very different place now.

    The fundamental for those who don't like Johnson is whether any Conservative Government is always preferable to any Labour Government and, within that, whether there are any circumstances in which a period of renewal in Opposition is preferable to being in Government.

    With that, the cafe is about to open...
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,883
    Interesting tory kremlinology here...

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-is-beyond-saving-inside-a-stunned-conservative-party-plotting-to-find-a-new-leader-1681006

    Mad Nad fucked up the confidence vote whipping operation by going full tonto on Rat Eyes.
    S/Lt (Acting) Mordaunt is too woke.
    That one with the enormous head is the frontrunner apparently.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 18,100

    HYUFD said:

    Taz said:

    Heathener said:

    Taz said:

    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    This plan to get agency staff for the Railways?
    AIUI, agency staff are in short supply everywhere. And they are turning down work right now.
    So. Where do they come from?

    It shows how little they actual understand about the things they are supposedly in charge of.

    I don’t believe there is such a thing as a qualified agency signalman and even if they did exist they won’t be qualified to run anything as all signal boxes require site specific knowledge that takes time to get
    It’s all to appear to be doing something.
    Pretty much sums up Boris Johnson. No soul. No ideology. No coherence.

    Just a muddled set of knee-jerk reactions to the latest crisis with the sole aim of holding onto power.

    There is nothing that defines Johnson or his brand of conservativism. It’s power for the Sake of it with no aim or purpose.
    Which is the point of being Oxford Union President, isn't it?

    Looking at this list,

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_Oxford_Union

    There are very few future PMs there. It's more Jeremy Thorpe and Gyles Brandreth than Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher.

    Might be a reason for that.
    Certainly at least one Oxford Union President on that least who became PM other than Johnson, Edward Heath in 1938.

    A few Presidents who nearly made it too, Michael Heseltine, Tony Benn and William Hague and one President, Philip May, who married a future PM
    Here is Edward Heath giving evidence to a Select Committee on PMQs. At 43 minutes, he mentions the Oxford Union as a training ground.
    https://youtu.be/FcKxJZZP2Z4?t=2581s
    There seems to be a dearth of senior politicians in the last 2-3 decades, even allowing for

    The most recent really senior one was Michael Gove, and a few tiddlers (Sam Gyimah, Damian Hinds, Jeremy Quinn). Only Sam Gyimah since 1990, unless I missed some.

    I see that Lee Anderson is not on the list :smile: .

    I hadn't realised they only had the post for about 8-10 weeks.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_Oxford_Union
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,684

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    I was surprised on the upside at the levels of celebration I saw around Scotland. I suppose we all see what we're looking for.
    Just have been fake lucky, never even saw a union Jack and that in West coast LOL not spot
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,756
    IshmaelZ said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    One just does

    My Italian waiter has arbitrarily decided I am French and I have managed to keep up the act for so far 4 interactions with him (he is speaking English to the next table). Inexplicably pleased about this
    I think a distinguished PBer suggested recently that the English envied the French because they thought them sexy, so you may be on a promise.
  • It is interesting that those who say polls are irrelevant when they show the Tories doing badly suddenly proclaim Labour is screwed and struggling as soon as the polls change a bit.

    Oh well dishonesty is Tory MO
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 39,156
    edited June 2022
    malcolmg said:

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    I was surprised on the upside at the levels of celebration I saw around Scotland. I suppose we all see what we're looking for.
    Just have been fake lucky, never even saw a union Jack and that in West coast LOL not spot
    Maybe he saw a miners' fete or Common Riding? Can't think what it was otherwise. Bit early for the chaps in bowler hats and sashes.

    Edit: my total was

    2 x houses with a couple of metres of bunting, or a few flags on sticks in flowerpots
    1 x old folks home with the above combined

    vs

    2 Ukrainian flags

    vs

    1 unidentifiable (by me) flag of a football club (?)
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,851
    edited June 2022

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    Get rid of Boris and we can all enjoy just hating and laughing at Labour above all things.
    Tories for messing up running the country, Labour as figures of hate and ridicule. LDs for super pantie bunching earnestness about extraordinarily irrelevant things and breaking cardboard box blue walls with a big orange hammer.
    The natural UK order.
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    Get rid of Boris and we can all enjoy just hating and laughing at Labour above all things.
    Tories for messing up running the country, Labour as figures of hate and ridicule. LDs for super pantie bunching earnestness about extraordinaily irrelevant things and breaking cardboard box blue walls with a big orange hammer.
    The natural UK order.
    I don’t like laughing at any party. But then I used to think the Tories were a proud institution. They no longer are.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047
    Dura_Ace said:

    Interesting tory kremlinology here...

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-is-beyond-saving-inside-a-stunned-conservative-party-plotting-to-find-a-new-leader-1681006

    Mad Nad fucked up the confidence vote whipping operation by going full tonto on Rat Eyes.
    S/Lt (Acting) Mordaunt is too woke.
    That one with the enormous head is the frontrunner apparently.

    You can 'un-woke' fairly easily. It's not a bad scenario for Mordaunt.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    IshmaelZ said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    One just does

    My Italian waiter has arbitrarily decided I am French and I have managed to keep up the act for so far 4 interactions with him (he is speaking English to the next table). Inexplicably pleased about this
    I don't. I like what I like, and I couldn't give even the tiniest of shits whether that puts me in a minority of one, or whether it puts me in with the Guardian readers, the lumpen proles, Hitler, or anyone else. I can't imagine being so ludicrously weak minded and insecure as to stop liking something because of the others who liked or disliked it.
    Chill pill in order I think

    There's a legitimate issue of over exposure. The Mona frigging Lisa may be a good painting, Beethovens setting of the ode to joy may be ok music, but they are both so over exposed it is no longer possible to tell. I like the Doors a lot, there is nothing wrong with Light My Fire, but when I hear it played I think fuck not this again, and am very grateful that the end and wtmo are too long for the radio
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,684
    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    I was surprised on the upside at the levels of celebration I saw around Scotland. I suppose we all see what we're looking for.
    Just have been fake lucky, never even saw a union Jack and that in West coast LOL not spot
    Maybe he saw a miners' fete or Common Riding? Can't think what it was otherwise. Bit early for the chaps in bowler hats and sashes.
    Morning Carnyx, they were out in force Sunday recently, droves
    of them
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,756

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    I was surprised on the upside at the levels of celebration I saw around Scotland. I suppose we all see what we're looking for.
    Well I wasn’t all around Scotland, but I was quite surprised that there were only 2 street party requests in its largest city and the capital of ultra Unionism. On the aforementioned social media I saw a lot of people moaning about councils and the SG not organising events which begged the question why they didn’t get off their arses and organise something themselves.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 39,156
    edited June 2022
    malcolmg said:

    Carnyx said:

    malcolmg said:

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    I was surprised on the upside at the levels of celebration I saw around Scotland. I suppose we all see what we're looking for.
    Just have been fake lucky, never even saw a union Jack and that in West coast LOL not spot
    Maybe he saw a miners' fete or Common Riding? Can't think what it was otherwise. Bit early for the chaps in bowler hats and sashes.
    Morning Carnyx, they were out in force Sunday recently, droves
    of them
    Ah. I see the migration season has begun. We don't get them over here in the east nearly so much.

    And morning Malky! Intermittent sun and showers here ...
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047
    malcolmg said:

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    I was surprised on the upside at the levels of celebration I saw around Scotland. I suppose we all see what we're looking for.
    Just have been fake lucky, never even saw a union Jack and that in West coast LOL not spot
    I was between Perthshire and the East Coast. And it's not that I saw scores of jubilant merry makers spontaneously breaking out into the National Anthen, it was more that it was marked in small ways and in various nice events. My expectations were very low tbf.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 8,480
    edited June 2022
    Dura_Ace said:

    Interesting tory kremlinology here...

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-is-beyond-saving-inside-a-stunned-conservative-party-plotting-to-find-a-new-leader-1681006

    Mad Nad fucked up the confidence vote whipping operation by going full tonto on Rat Eyes.
    S/Lt (Acting) Mordaunt is too woke.
    That one with the enormous head is the frontrunner apparently.

    Hmm, some of the those quotes look to be from just one person, though. I can't see the the Conservative grassroots getting behind Nadim Zahawi, to be perfectly honest. Mordaunt looks the more likely out of those two, to me.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,840

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    There wasn't much round this bit of England.
    Mind you. We are north of Gretna so that might explain it.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,883

    Dura_Ace said:

    Interesting tory kremlinology here...

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-is-beyond-saving-inside-a-stunned-conservative-party-plotting-to-find-a-new-leader-1681006

    Mad Nad fucked up the confidence vote whipping operation by going full tonto on Rat Eyes.
    S/Lt (Acting) Mordaunt is too woke.
    That one with the enormous head is the frontrunner apparently.

    You can 'un-woke' fairly easily. It's not a bad scenario for Mordaunt.
    Assad stan to Penny Dreadful simp is quite a journey.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 8,480
    edited June 2022
    dixiedean said:

    Carnyx said:

    Heathener said:

    Sandpit said:

    On topic, there wil be a Tory poll lead about a fortnight after fuel duty gets suspended.

    Hmmm. I'm still not sure you really get the national mood in your UAE hideaway.
    I don't think any of us really 'get' the national mood. Few of us talk with wide swathes of the population, especially about politics. We have family and friends, often of similar backgrounds to our own, and many of us frequent comfortable echo chambers on the Internet.

    Are discussions I have with parents in the schoolground whilst waiting for their kids to come out of class representative of a 'national mood' , or just ones of certain geographic and economic basis?

    Then there's the issue of what you hear: if I am talking with someone who is very left-wing, I am unlikely to talk about privatisation unless I know them very well. I'm more likely just to nod and listen.

    We can only see a tiny slice of that national mood.
    I'd go further (having agreed with everything you posted) and ask if there is even such a thing as a "national mood" any more. We are more and more polarised and divided, and the government's only consistent policy is to fan these flames and makes us ever more so.
    I'd suggest that last weekend was a prime example of us having a 'national mood'. Millions of people having a good time and getting to know each other on a rather spurious basis.

    Then there's the question of whether there was ever really a 'national mood'. Even during World War II there were plenty of dissenting voices and moods that varied from: "Let's go and kill all the vile Hun!" through "Let's just go, get the job done and get home," to "We shouldn't fight, war's bad". Then there were the black marketeers and strikers who were not exactly fitting in with what we see as the mood at the time.
    Indeed. I think Angus Calder's 'The people's war' was quite a shock at the time of publication in 1969, for its revisionist take, though (slightly surprisingly) I haven't read his later 'Myth of the Blitz'.
    For all the beating that social media gets it’s decent at dispelling the national myth stuff. Last weekend I was surprised at just how much genuine participation in the royal jamboree there was south of Gretna and how much genuine indifference there was north of it. If we’d only had the media package available in say 1977, ie a fawning BBC and deranged tabloids, the myth of an all consuming national Platty Joobs would be well on its way to be established. We wouldn’t have royalists gloomily prognosticating about what a disaster King Charles will be within a week of the Windsorgasm either.
    There wasn't much round this bit of England.
    Mind you. We are north of Gretna so that might explain it.
    A lot of it in surprising bits of the big cities, I think. Plenty around here in diverse West London, and nearer my older stamping ground in North London. Quite a few parties in Brixton and Peckham too, apparently.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047
    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    One just does

    My Italian waiter has arbitrarily decided I am French and I have managed to keep up the act for so far 4 interactions with him (he is speaking English to the next table). Inexplicably pleased about this
    I don't. I like what I like, and I couldn't give even the tiniest of shits whether that puts me in a minority of one, or whether it puts me in with the Guardian readers, the lumpen proles, Hitler, or anyone else. I can't imagine being so ludicrously weak minded and insecure as to stop liking something because of the others who liked or disliked it.
    Chill pill in order I think

    There's a legitimate issue of over exposure. The Mona frigging Lisa may be a good painting, Beethovens setting of the ode to joy may be ok music, but they are both so over exposed it is no longer possible to tell. I like the Doors a lot, there is nothing wrong with Light My Fire, but when I hear it played I think fuck not this again, and am very grateful that the end and wtmo are too long for the radio
    I am not actually annoyed, I was using hyperbole. Besides, I misunderstood Kinnabula's point.

    This is a theme I feel quite strongly about. It goes back to Brexit and being questioned about how I could support something espoused by [insert racist scumbag here]. It didn't even compute for me that there would be people who would change their mind on an important issue for reasons like that.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950
    edited June 2022
    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 14,093
    MattW said:

    HYUFD said:

    Taz said:

    Heathener said:

    Taz said:

    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    This plan to get agency staff for the Railways?
    AIUI, agency staff are in short supply everywhere. And they are turning down work right now.
    So. Where do they come from?

    It shows how little they actual understand about the things they are supposedly in charge of.

    I don’t believe there is such a thing as a qualified agency signalman and even if they did exist they won’t be qualified to run anything as all signal boxes require site specific knowledge that takes time to get
    It’s all to appear to be doing something.
    Pretty much sums up Boris Johnson. No soul. No ideology. No coherence.

    Just a muddled set of knee-jerk reactions to the latest crisis with the sole aim of holding onto power.

    There is nothing that defines Johnson or his brand of conservativism. It’s power for the Sake of it with no aim or purpose.
    Which is the point of being Oxford Union President, isn't it?

    Looking at this list,

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_Oxford_Union

    There are very few future PMs there. It's more Jeremy Thorpe and Gyles Brandreth than Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher.

    Might be a reason for that.
    Certainly at least one Oxford Union President on that least who became PM other than Johnson, Edward Heath in 1938.

    A few Presidents who nearly made it too, Michael Heseltine, Tony Benn and William Hague and one President, Philip May, who married a future PM
    Here is Edward Heath giving evidence to a Select Committee on PMQs. At 43 minutes, he mentions the Oxford Union as a training ground.
    https://youtu.be/FcKxJZZP2Z4?t=2581s
    There seems to be a dearth of senior politicians in the last 2-3 decades, even allowing for

    The most recent really senior one was Michael Gove, and a few tiddlers (Sam Gyimah, Damian Hinds, Jeremy Quinn). Only Sam Gyimah since 1990, unless I missed some.

    I see that Lee Anderson is not on the list :smile: .

    I hadn't realised they only had the post for about 8-10 weeks.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_Oxford_Union
    I reckon it's the difference between being famous for having a talent and being famous for being famous.

    Oxford Union stuff is a great training in winning debates and winning elections. But there's no content, it's all about the rhetoric and personality. And if that's all you have, reality will find you out.

    Which is what's happening to Johnson. With the added twist that his content-free electioneering skills make him hard to depose, even when that's in the Conservative Party's interests.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047
    Dura_Ace said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Interesting tory kremlinology here...

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-is-beyond-saving-inside-a-stunned-conservative-party-plotting-to-find-a-new-leader-1681006

    Mad Nad fucked up the confidence vote whipping operation by going full tonto on Rat Eyes.
    S/Lt (Acting) Mordaunt is too woke.
    That one with the enormous head is the frontrunner apparently.

    You can 'un-woke' fairly easily. It's not a bad scenario for Mordaunt.
    Assad stan to Penny Dreadful simp is quite a journey.
    No journey. My opinions are case by case.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004
    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    I understand Biden is about to send Mexicans to Spain
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    kinabalu said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    One just does

    My Italian waiter has arbitrarily decided I am French and I have managed to keep up the act for so far 4 interactions with him (he is speaking English to the next table). Inexplicably pleased about this
    That's huge.
    That's what she said
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,044
    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    If they are not successful what happens?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 38,857

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    With Abba, I think it's just over-familiarity. By chance I discovered that they recorded a lot of their songs in Spanish and it was like listening to them with fresh ears.
    Some of it, yes, but some of that in turn comes from the reappraisal. Don't get me wrong, I quite like them. The reappraisal from cheese to banging pop group I largely go along with. It's just the extra mile towards 'one of the finest music combos ever' where I demur and get off.

    Yes, in the Spanish works well, esp Fernando which is an utter dirge as regards the original (imo) but in the Spanish somehow acquires lilt and gravitas.
  • TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    The Home Office is apparently planning a new propaganda campaign in France, with a picture of a dangerously over-full dinghy, and the caption : "Planning to come the UK illegally ? You could end up in Rwanda."

    I don't think the ultimate objective is to promote Rwanda as a great WFH and lifestyle working opportunity, to be perfectly honest.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950

    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    If they are not successful what happens?
    Back to country of origin. Presumably as far as can be determined.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,718
    edited June 2022

    MattW said:

    HYUFD said:

    Taz said:

    Heathener said:

    Taz said:

    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    This plan to get agency staff for the Railways?
    AIUI, agency staff are in short supply everywhere. And they are turning down work right now.
    So. Where do they come from?

    It shows how little they actual understand about the things they are supposedly in charge of.

    I don’t believe there is such a thing as a qualified agency signalman and even if they did exist they won’t be qualified to run anything as all signal boxes require site specific knowledge that takes time to get
    It’s all to appear to be doing something.
    Pretty much sums up Boris Johnson. No soul. No ideology. No coherence.

    Just a muddled set of knee-jerk reactions to the latest crisis with the sole aim of holding onto power.

    There is nothing that defines Johnson or his brand of conservativism. It’s power for the Sake of it with no aim or purpose.
    Which is the point of being Oxford Union President, isn't it?

    Looking at this list,

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_Oxford_Union

    There are very few future PMs there. It's more Jeremy Thorpe and Gyles Brandreth than Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher.

    Might be a reason for that.
    Certainly at least one Oxford Union President on that least who became PM other than Johnson, Edward Heath in 1938.

    A few Presidents who nearly made it too, Michael Heseltine, Tony Benn and William Hague and one President, Philip May, who married a future PM
    Here is Edward Heath giving evidence to a Select Committee on PMQs. At 43 minutes, he mentions the Oxford Union as a training ground.
    https://youtu.be/FcKxJZZP2Z4?t=2581s
    There seems to be a dearth of senior politicians in the last 2-3 decades, even allowing for

    The most recent really senior one was Michael Gove, and a few tiddlers (Sam Gyimah, Damian Hinds, Jeremy Quinn). Only Sam Gyimah since 1990, unless I missed some.

    I see that Lee Anderson is not on the list :smile: .

    I hadn't realised they only had the post for about 8-10 weeks.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_Oxford_Union
    I reckon it's the difference between being famous for having a talent and being famous for being famous.

    Oxford Union stuff is a great training in winning debates and winning elections. But there's no content, it's all about the rhetoric and personality. And if that's all you have, reality will find you out.

    Which is what's happening to Johnson. With the added twist that his content-free electioneering skills make him hard to depose, even when that's in the Conservative Party's interests.
    Jacob Rees Mogg and Ann Widdecombe were Union Librarians. Harold Macmillan and Lord Salisbury were Union Secretaries who went on to be PM. Macmillan and Widdecombe were also Treasurer.

    However you have to go back to Gladstone to find the last Oxford Union President who became PM before Heath and Johnson (although Heseltine was deputy PM and a former President). Although Hague was a Union President who became Leader of the Opposition.

    Thorpe as mentioned was a past President who became Liberal leader, former SDP leader and Labour leadership candidate Roy Jenkins was an active Union member and stood for President but lost
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,851
    Dura_Ace said:

    Interesting tory kremlinology here...

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-is-beyond-saving-inside-a-stunned-conservative-party-plotting-to-find-a-new-leader-1681006

    Mad Nad fucked up the confidence vote whipping operation by going full tonto on Rat Eyes.
    S/Lt (Acting) Mordaunt is too woke.
    That one with the enormous head is the frontrunner apparently.

    One MP said 'the one im supporting is definitely the unity candidate'
    Another disagreed and said 'no, the one im supporting is'
    Not disfunctional.
  • TresTres Posts: 2,164
    Yawn, should I become dictator for the day I would make membership of the Oxford Union or even just applying for that fucking PPE course come with a lifetime bar from running for office.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950

    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    The Home Office is apparently planning a new propaganda campaign in France, with a picture of a dangerously over-full dinghy, and the caption : "Planning to come the UK illegally ? You could end up in Rwanda."

    I don't think the ultimate objective is to promote Rwanda as a great WFH and lifestyle working opportunity, to be perfectly honest.
    The govt has said only a limited number will be sent. Which makes me think that for any would-be asylum seeker with a laptop and rudimentary risk assessment software (or alternatively the calculator on their phone) it will be simple to work out the trivial increase in risk of being sent to Rwanda vs dying on the way over.
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,724
    Sad news. First wicket of the morning. Lees for 67. 147-2
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,851
    Tres said:

    Yawn, should I become dictator for the day I would make membership of the Oxford Union or even just applying for that fucking PPE course come with a lifetime bar from running for office.

    Not a bad policy.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,724
    edited June 2022

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,094
    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    Carnyx said:

    Taz said:

    Carnyx said:

    ydoethur said:

    Carnyx said:

    eek said:

    dixiedean said:

    This plan to get agency staff for the Railways?
    AIUI, agency staff are in short supply everywhere. And they are turning down work right now.
    So. Where do they come from?

    It shows how little they actual understand about the things they are supposedly in charge of.

    I don’t believe there is such a thing as a qualified agency signalman and even if they did exist they won’t be qualified to run anything as all signal boxes require site specific knowledge that takes time to get
    I am sure there are some non technical roles agency staff could do, but it seems a bit desperate.
    Especially as one needs a certain minimum number of signalmen, for instance, to keep the railways running. And one can't simply make them work overtime. Classic disaster trigger (e.g. a signalling engineer caused a disaster by leaving some bare wiring in a signalbox as a result of being grossly overworked).

    If I were a manager I wouldn't touch any derogation of regulations, either. That would be to accept liability for the ensuing crash.
    Shades of Abermiwl, where untrained staff accidentally allowed a train onto a section which already contained an oncoming express, with disastrous consequences.
    Quite (once I had worked out that this is the correct orthography for the location in question, which is better known in railway books by its anglicised version). But the problem remains, as with the signalling engineer incident (1988).

    This threat to bring in blacklegs is so stupid, a few managers aside, that it must be a deliberate Tory attempt to inflame the strike and get better ratings for Big Dog.
    It’s like an eighties greatest hits tour. We are already seeing pieces in big dog friendly papers about how labour MPs who support the strike have taken money from the Rail Unions.
    Seventies, soon, with the power cuts and oil crisis.
    Oh, "but the music".

    For every magic memory by the Sex Pistols and The Clash there were ten by Joe Dolce, Paper Lace, Boney M, Rick Dees with his "Disco Duck"....
    I think Rivers of Babylon is fab

    And if that doesn't give you an earworm, Rasputin

    Thinking about it they are the black Abba
    I used to go to Sana'a in Yemen (in the time before the Saudis and Iranians decided to flatten, it as a neutral venue for a proxy war). One of the more surreal experiences was being woken by the call to prayers starting with the central Rasputin theme played on what I can only think was a Rolf Harris Stylophone.

    I relayed this to a very skeptical colleague, who at that point had not visited. But once he did "Bloody hell.....Ra-ra-rasputin at some ungodly hour....why???"

    I do miss stuff like that, not having travelled abroad now for 3 years.
    Sicily is 3 hours and £60 quid away

    Sitting in the piazza del Duomo in Ortygia, thinking the world really is Italy, and the rest
    That fish restaurant just up the hill on the mainland side of the causeway used to be really good, some years back. Name began with P I think?
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 12,415
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    The Home Office is apparently planning a new propaganda campaign in France, with a picture of a dangerously over-full dinghy, and the caption : "Planning to come the UK illegally ? You could end up in Rwanda."

    I don't think the ultimate objective is to promote Rwanda as a great WFH and lifestyle working opportunity, to be perfectly honest.
    The govt has said only a limited number will be sent. Which makes me think that for any would-be asylum seeker with a laptop and rudimentary risk assessment software (or alternatively the calculator on their phone) it will be simple to work out the trivial increase in risk of being sent to Rwanda vs dying on the way over.
    Spot on! Which makes any Tory who says this is a real policy and will work either thick or a damned liar.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,718
    edited June 2022
    Tres said:

    Yawn, should I become dictator for the day I would make membership of the Oxford Union or even just applying for that fucking PPE course come with a lifetime bar from running for office.

    So that would mean Gladstone, Heath and Johnson and Cameron could never have become PM, Hague and Ed Miliband could never have become Leader of the Opposition, Heseltine could never have become Deputy PM, Jeremy Hunt and David Miliband and Liz Truss could never have become Foreign Secretary, Sunak and Philip Hammond and Nigel Lawrence could never have become Chancellor, Yvette Cooper could not be Shadow Home Secretary and Rachel Reeves could not be Shadow Chancellor to name but a few.
  • TresTres Posts: 2,164
    HYUFD said:

    Tres said:

    Yawn, should I become dictator for the day I would make membership of the Oxford Union or even just applying for that fucking PPE course come with a lifetime bar from running for office.

    So that would mean Gladstone, Heath and Johnson and Cameron could never have become PM, Hague and Ed Miliband could never have become Leader of the Opposition, Heseltine could never have become Deputy PM, Hunt and David Miliband could never have become Foreign Secretary, Sunak and Philip Hammond and Nigel Lawrence could never have become Chancellor, Yvette Cooper could not be Shadow Home Secretary to name but a few.
    Only if I also invented a time machine.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,044

    Tres said:

    Yawn, should I become dictator for the day I would make membership of the Oxford Union or even just applying for that fucking PPE course come with a lifetime bar from running for office.

    Not a bad policy.
    Alan Johnson in an interview the other day bought up the old american joke that "anyone who wants to be President should be barred for life from applying".
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047
    edited June 2022

    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    If they are not successful what happens?
    Back to the UK. :lol:
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,851
    HYUFD said:

    Tres said:

    Yawn, should I become dictator for the day I would make membership of the Oxford Union or even just applying for that fucking PPE course come with a lifetime bar from running for office.

    So that would mean Gladstone, Heath and Johnson and Cameron could never have become PM, Hague and Ed Miliband could never have become Leader of the Opposition, Heseltine could never have become Deputy PM, Hunt and David Miliband could never have become Foreign Secretary, Sunak and Philip Hammond and Nigel Lawrence could never have become Chancellor, Yvette Cooper could not be Shadow Home Secretary to name but a few.
    And the children held hands and sang for a beautiful new world lay before them
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004
    edited June 2022

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    Abuse is always unnecessary

    And thank you
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,724

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    The Home Office is apparently planning a new propaganda campaign in France, with a picture of a dangerously over-full dinghy, and the caption : "Planning to come the UK illegally ? You could end up in Rwanda."

    I don't think the ultimate objective is to promote Rwanda as a great WFH and lifestyle working opportunity, to be perfectly honest.
    The govt has said only a limited number will be sent. Which makes me think that for any would-be asylum seeker with a laptop and rudimentary risk assessment software (or alternatively the calculator on their phone) it will be simple to work out the trivial increase in risk of being sent to Rwanda vs dying on the way over.
    Spot on! Which makes any Tory who says this is a real policy and will work either thick or a damned liar.
    According to a Facebook post, one of those shortly be deported is the son of one of the Afghan interpreters attached to our forces. The father's dead apparently.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 18,100

    tlg86 said:

    tlg86 said:

    MattW said:

    tlg86 said:

    Tomorrow is going to be fun...

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/jun/12/carole-cadwalladr-arron-banks-defamation-verdict-press-freedom

    The highly anticipated judgment in the libel action brought by multimillionaire Brexit backer Arron Banks against the Observer and Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr will be handed down this week. The landmark verdict will potentially have huge ramifications for press freedom and investigative reporting.

    Mrs Justice Steyn will deliver her judgment by email on Monday morning. The decision will be the culmination of an often rancorous three-year legal battle and could send a chilling effect throughout British journalism.

    I wonder if the Guardian will be reporting objectively on this one :smile: .

    Personally I am hoping it will have ramifications for journalistic competence (see the industrial scale production of corrections following CC's articles).
    Do journalists take out professional indemnity insurance? Perhaps they should.
    I wonder if the Guardian will bail her out if she does lose. Or does their support for her stop short of that?
    Arron Banks presumably hopes so. Whatever the merits, suing individual journalists rather than their publishers is surely a sinister development.
    Normally you sue the individual/organisation with the deepest pockets. But given Banks's wealth, I assume he thought it more amusing to sue Cadwalladr personally.
    "Do journalists take out professional indemnity insurance"

    Certainly should do if you are freelancer.
    Did Banks sue the Guardian as well? And what was the outcome? Genuine question - I don't know.

    The G has a tax-sheltered £1bn endowment iirc.

    Cadwalladr has already raised approx £825,000 via crowd funding.

    We will hear tomorrow.
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    Abuse is always unnecessary
    Except against people you don’t agree with politically when you engage and cheer people on doing it.

    Fuck off you twat
  • Anyway I’ve said my piece.
  • Can we discuss Lisa Nandy who apparently would be a political genius.

    She came out and supported the strikes. I’m not sure that was a great move.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004
    edited June 2022

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    Abuse is always unnecessary
    Except against people you don’t agree with politically when you engage and cheer people on doing it.

    Fuck off you twat
    I really do not think this forum deserves such a response but I will leave it to others to judge
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 38,857
    edited June 2022
    IshmaelZ said:

    IshmaelZ said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Why would you stop being a fan just because others overrate them?
    An excellent question.
    One just does

    My Italian waiter has arbitrarily decided I am French and I have managed to keep up the act for so far 4 interactions with him (he is speaking English to the next table). Inexplicably pleased about this
    I don't. I like what I like, and I couldn't give even the tiniest of shits whether that puts me in a minority of one, or whether it puts me in with the Guardian readers, the lumpen proles, Hitler, or anyone else. I can't imagine being so ludicrously weak minded and insecure as to stop liking something because of the others who liked or disliked it.
    Chill pill in order I think

    There's a legitimate issue of over exposure. The Mona frigging Lisa may be a good painting, Beethovens setting of the ode to joy may be ok music, but they are both so over exposed it is no longer possible to tell. I like the Doors a lot, there is nothing wrong with Light My Fire, but when I hear it played I think fuck not this again, and am very grateful that the end and wtmo are too long for the radio
    Yes, this is all I really mean. If most people like something more than I do it feels wrong to describe myself as a "fan" of that thing. Fandom involves liking something more than the average bear does.

    Eg I like carrots but not to an unusual extent. Therefore it's wrong to say I'm a fan of carrots. But imagine I like carrots just the same amount as before but with the difference that most people hate carrots. Now it does make sense to say I'm a fan of carrots.

    Edit: on reflection a slightly different point to yours but complementary to it.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,724

    Anyway I’ve said my piece.

    Horse. Please stop this. You're better than this. You are letting yourself down, and IMHO heading for a ban.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,286
    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Agree. Boney M's output is fantastic.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950

    TOPPING said:

    Very articulate Rwandan spokesperson on LBC explaining the asylum agreement.

    The interviewer was unaware that the asylum claims were to be processed in Rwanda and successful applicants would get to stay in Rwanda. ie it is not an offshore processing facility. I thought that was well known and a supposed feature not a bug.

    If they are not successful what happens?
    Back to the UK. :lol:
    Eventually I have no doubt.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,044

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    You don't seem to be in a very good mood this morning. Perhaps time to step away from the keypad and get some air?
  • Anyway I’ve said my piece.

    Horse. Please stop this. You're better than this. You are letting yourself down, and IMHO heading for a ban.
    If that’s the case then so be it.

    This forum operates in such a way that abuse and rudeness to a couple of specific users is cheered on and tolerated and then they pile onto anyone who calls it out. I have pointed this out and it never changes.

    I like you OKC but on this you have a total blind spot.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 14,884

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    Horse, what do you gel out of being like this? Are you enjoying it? You don’t like a certain poster? Fine. Ignore him. You frequently post interesting things with insight from labour, and it seems you have some links to close to the inner circle.
    There is no need to endlessly be deliberately rude. Ismael is much better at it...
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    You don't seem to be in a very good mood this morning. Perhaps time to step away from the keypad and get some air?
    I’m not in a good mood because HYUFD spent the whole of yesterday being abused and shouted at and nothing was done.

    I’ve called out the user in question who now plays the victim even though he said the same things to HYUFD yesterday.

    I stand by everything I’ve done. If that results in a ban then that’s fine, I’ll go knowing I did the right thing.
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    Horse, what do you gel out of being like this? Are you enjoying it? You don’t like a certain poster? Fine. Ignore him. You frequently post interesting things with insight from labour, and it seems you have some links to close to the inner circle.
    There is no need to endlessly be deliberately rude. Ismael is much better at it...
    And yet this user is constantly rude and abusive to HYUFD. Why don’t you call that out?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 14,884

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    Horse, what do you gel out of being like this? Are you enjoying it? You don’t like a certain poster? Fine. Ignore him. You frequently post interesting things with insight from labour, and it seems you have some links to close to the inner circle.
    There is no need to endlessly be deliberately rude. Ismael is much better at it...
    And yet this user is constantly rude and abusive to HYUFD. Why don’t you call that out?
    The difference is he disagrees without resorting to swearing, as far as I can tell.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950
    Seems like I missed a fun-packed day yesterday on PB.
  • I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    Horse, what do you gel out of being like this? Are you enjoying it? You don’t like a certain poster? Fine. Ignore him. You frequently post interesting things with insight from labour, and it seems you have some links to close to the inner circle.
    There is no need to endlessly be deliberately rude. Ismael is much better at it...
    And yet this user is constantly rude and abusive to HYUFD. Why don’t you call that out?
    The difference is he disagrees without resorting to swearing, as far as I can tell.
    No he doesn’t. Look at what he said yesterday and was cheering on. Literally bullying a user off this site.

    Again I like you but you have a total blind spot on this.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,165
    A lengthy pit stop for Perez; I’m shocked.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,175
    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.
  • TresTres Posts: 2,164
    Consultation on Imperial measures is here - https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/choice-on-units-of-measurement-markings-and-sales

    Helpfully 1c gives you the option to state 'items should not be sold in imperial measures'.

  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,840
    tlg86 said:

    A lengthy pit stop for Perez; I’m shocked.

    He's not the only one judging by the last few posts.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 14,884

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    Horse, what do you gel out of being like this? Are you enjoying it? You don’t like a certain poster? Fine. Ignore him. You frequently post interesting things with insight from labour, and it seems you have some links to close to the inner circle.
    There is no need to endlessly be deliberately rude. Ismael is much better at it...
    And yet this user is constantly rude and abusive to HYUFD. Why don’t you call that out?
    The difference is he disagrees without resorting to swearing, as far as I can tell.
    No he doesn’t. Look at what he said yesterday and was cheering on. Literally bullying a user off this site.

    Again I like you but you have a total blind spot on this.
    To be honest I was playing cricket all day yesterday, and have desire to read old threads. Just wanting a chill Sunday.
  • A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I think this one is very unpopular because of how much Tube drivers get paid.

    Of course my solution to that is to pay nurses and doctors more but then I believe in aspiration where the Tories prefer to pull people down
  • TresTres Posts: 2,164

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I think this one is very unpopular because of how much Tube drivers get paid.

    Of course my solution to that is to pay nurses and doctors more but then I believe in aspiration where the Tories prefer to pull people down
    Tube drivers aren't the ones striking though.
  • Tres said:

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I think this one is very unpopular because of how much Tube drivers get paid.

    Of course my solution to that is to pay nurses and doctors more but then I believe in aspiration where the Tories prefer to pull people down
    Tube drivers aren't the ones striking though.
    They aren't but that's what people see in terms of transport workers going on strike
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,004
    edited June 2022

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    Horse, that is beyond unnecessarily unpleasant. Please delete.
    I stand by what I said.

    I see the waverers are back on team Tory again. They were wavering for a whole week this time

    I would just comment that the 148 and those of us who support them are not 'waverers' but conservatives who want Boris ousted, but support the conservative party against a labour government

    There is a difference
    Remember when you said your vote was up for grabs and you could vote Labour.

    Another lie.
    It was nor a lie at the time, but circumstances have changed and the 148 conservatives have my full support and while I did vote for Blair twice, Starmer and labour are not Blair or his labour no matter how much they playact
    You’re a big fat liar
    There is absolutely no need for such personal abuse

    Maybe step back from your key board
    Just like when you spent yesterday abusing HYUFD.

    Hypocrite and twat
    You don't seem to be in a very good mood this morning. Perhaps time to step away from the keypad and get some air?
    I’m not in a good mood because HYUFD spent the whole of yesterday being abused and shouted at and nothing was done.

    I’ve called out the user in question who now plays the victim even though he said the same things to HYUFD yesterday.

    I stand by everything I’ve done. If that results in a ban then that’s fine, I’ll go knowing I did the right thing.
    I would remind you that you suggested @HYUFD is being paid to post on here and have not apologised to him for something manifestly untrue

    You have this strange concept that vigorous debate is abuse and shouting out when you are more than able to shout and abuse yourself as evidenced on here this morning

    This forum has been excellent today with lots of intense debate then you decide to embark on abusive language which was entirely unnecessary

    However, it is for others to decide if it is acceptable but for me I find it sad that you feel a need to express yourself in this manner today
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 6,851
    edited June 2022

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I saw one from i think YouGov. Against but not by an overwhelming margin
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 38,857
    TOPPING said:

    Seems like I missed a fun-packed day yesterday on PB.

    Yes, who was driven off the site?

    I've been on a digital detox as I wait for my new HP Envy 14 from Currys.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 8,480
    edited June 2022

    Can we discuss Lisa Nandy who apparently would be a political genius.

    She came out and supported the strikes. I’m not sure that was a great move.

    To get back onto political discussion, I agree this is an important question. All the pieces are in flux as regards the parties' approach to strikes, and I don't think the Tories are sure where to stand either. Two weeks ago they were throwing up an awful lot of hot air about supporting the sacked P&O workers, because they're aware of the precedent they set by promoting themselves as the party of the workers over the "metropoiltan" elite. We've had five years of Brexit rhetoric about fighting for the working class, as I mentioned below, so this is a crucial moment.

    Labour should adopt the Miliband, German-style consensual and workers-on-boards stance, but, the Tories ? I really haven't the faintest idea what they should do, and it could be another real crisis moment for them, when the working class rhetoric clashes into the demands of their donors for the decisive time.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,840

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    It's not really a niche position. You can see from the opinions on here.
  • @HYUFD I am sure you know that I was joking when I said you were being paid to post on here but if that wasn't clear then I do apologise. As you know I think you are one of the kindest and best posters here.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 14,884

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I think this one is very unpopular because of how much Tube drivers get paid.

    Of course my solution to that is to pay nurses and doctors more but then I believe in aspiration where the Tories prefer to pull people down
    On the rail strike, one of th3 big issues is that rail use is still down since the pandemic, and frankly a lot of people are far more set up to wfh than two years ago.
    Can’t get to the office in 2019 - real pain in the arse, trying to sort work environments etc.
    Can’t get to the office in 2022 - no problem reactivate pandemic plan, or just carry on what’s already happening.
    (Won’t work for all, of course).
    So to the public, overstretched NHS workers deserve a big pay rise if possible, while the railways don’t. Not saying that’s fair, but that’s how some will see it.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 14,884

    @HYUFD I am sure you know that I was joking when I said you were being paid to post on here but if that wasn't clear then I do apologise. As you know I think you are one of the kindest and best posters here.

    It was not clear. Nuance is lost on forum posts, as others have found out!
  • @HYUFD I am sure you know that I was joking when I said you were being paid to post on here but if that wasn't clear then I do apologise. As you know I think you are one of the kindest and best posters here.

    It was not clear. Nuance is lost on forum posts, as others have found out!
    Well I thought in the context of the discussion we were having it was clear but I'm happy to clarify that I was joking.

    It would be very out of character for me to attack HYUFD because I like him and also respect what he has to say. He receives the most awful abuse on here from two particular users on a daily basis and I would not want to contribute to that.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,175

    Tres said:

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I think this one is very unpopular because of how much Tube drivers get paid.

    Of course my solution to that is to pay nurses and doctors more but then I believe in aspiration where the Tories prefer to pull people down
    Tube drivers aren't the ones striking though.
    They aren't but that's what people see in terms of transport workers going on strike
    That’s what people in London see in terms of transport workers going on strike.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 38,857
    Andy_JS said:

    kinabalu said:

    I think Abba have gone from underrated to overrated. Boney M for me are still in underrated territory. Very much so in fact. I recently wrote a spoof song "Mad Bad Vlad Putin" to the tune of Ra Ra Rasputin which involved listening to the original several times and left me thinking, gosh great song actually (theirs not mine) and which then took me down a rabbit hole of other stuff by them. Some minor gems! To mention just 2: Belfast, a punchy protest about the Troubles that you could dance to, and a more than passable disco ballady treatment of Neil Young's Heart Of Gold which had me smiling and thinking where has THAT been all my life? Big stage presence too, the live versions often better than the record. So, yes, Boney M rocked. Course they will one day get discovered again by opinion formers and then it'll swing the other way and they'll get ridiculously overrated like Abba. But until then I'm a fan.

    Agree. Boney M's output is fantastic.
    I was genuinely surprised when I sank into it. As I say, for work purposes, but it didn't feel like work at all.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950
    kinabalu said:

    TOPPING said:

    Seems like I missed a fun-packed day yesterday on PB.

    Yes, who was driven off the site?

    I've been on a digital detox as I wait for my new HP Envy 14 from Currys.
    Assuming that is a phone then it's Poco all the way for me. Looking to replace my Poco f1 right now AAMOF.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 18,100
    Tres said:

    Consultation on Imperial measures is here - https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/choice-on-units-of-measurement-markings-and-sales

    Helpfully 1c gives you the option to state 'items should not be sold in imperial measures'.

    From all the shouting - especially on Euro-twitter I admit - I thought we already had a law which had mandated Groats for everything, and made commas in large numbers subject to the death or deportation to St Helena penalties.

    Thanks for the link.
  • Johnson is caught in a catch 22 at present, he needs to shore up Southern seats but by doing that he's abandoning the North.

    And that is fundamentally why those seats have swung back to Labour. Recall that these seats were held under some pretty terrible leaders Like Foot, so it should not be a surprise that Starmer will take them back even if he's not in Blair leagues of "good".

    Frankly I still believe in the value of what he's doing, which is destroying the left from the inside and allowing Labour to be in Government soon.

    My central forecast remains a Hung Parliament.
  • CorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorseBattery Posts: 21,436
    edited June 2022

    Tres said:

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I think this one is very unpopular because of how much Tube drivers get paid.

    Of course my solution to that is to pay nurses and doctors more but then I believe in aspiration where the Tories prefer to pull people down
    Tube drivers aren't the ones striking though.
    They aren't but that's what people see in terms of transport workers going on strike
    That’s what people in London see in terms of transport workers going on strike.
    I hear it from plenty of people outside London too.

    To me Tube drivers just show how good effective trade unions are however inconvenient the strikes are.

    Who really should go on strike is bus drivers who get paid sod all.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 7,461

    Can we discuss Lisa Nandy who apparently would be a political genius.

    She came out and supported the strikes. I’m not sure that was a great move.

    So did Wes Streeting, on QT. If I recall correctly, you're a huge fan of his?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,840
    edited June 2022
    Was talking to someone high up in the supply teaching business on Thursday.
    The position as regards September vacancies in schools in the NE is utterly dire.
    There is a very real prospect of classes being sent home.
    3% this year and 2% the next is not going to help.
  • Can we discuss Lisa Nandy who apparently would be a political genius.

    She came out and supported the strikes. I’m not sure that was a great move.

    So did Wes Streeting, on QT. If I recall correctly, you're a huge fan of his?
    I am a huge fan but that was moronic.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 7,175

    A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I saw one from i think YouGov. Against but not by an overwhelming margin
    Thanks. Found it: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/survey-results/daily/2022/06/08/d6f7e/3 As you say, against, but not by much, and most people in the middle.
  • A lot of people here appear to be presuming that strike action is loathed by the electorate. I am not convinced. Have we seen any recent polling on the strike? In past cases, public opinion has often been quite supportive of strike actions.

    I saw one from i think YouGov. Against but not by an overwhelming margin
    Thanks. Found it: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/survey-results/daily/2022/06/08/d6f7e/3 As you say, against, but not by much, and most people in the middle.
    Huh, maybe public opinion is changing.
This discussion has been closed.