Re the local elections, and following on from Yougov.
I think that Wandsworth is a lot more than leaning Labour. I think that Labour will win the borough very comfortably.
Barnet, I think, comes down to whether Starmer has detoxified Labour sufficiently among Jewish voters. Labour should win a clear majority in the wards making up Chipping Barnet. It will turn on whether they can make headway in Hendon, and in Finchley & Golders Green.
Westminster should see Labour lead comfortably in terms of vote share, but like Kensington, the ward boundaries are drawn very favourably towards the Conservatives. Labour need a big lead to take that borough.
The "journalists" rewriting the same beergate scandal story every day. Have they been promised their own show on a right wing TV network with no viewers if they do as they are told?
The "RochdalePioneers" rewriting the same beergate scandal story every day on PB. Has he been promised his own show on a left wing TV network with no viewers if he does as he is told?
Posting 50 times a day that NOBODY IS POSTING ABOUT THE STORY I AM POSTING ABOUT, NOBODY, DO YOU HEAR ME? is deep into Cretan paradox country
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
What drama in the Bernabeau. The commentators were already talking about the Liverpool/City final then . . . what an impressive comeback to go to Extra Time.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sport free with my btinternet broadband 😁
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
8.7 million watched last years champions league final
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sprot free with my btinternet broadband 😁
I've now got it free via a Starmer Stream. Thats why he was illegally eating a curry with Nye Bevan, to set up internet streaming services.
Fancy Real to win this now, with home advantage and all the fervour
But Liverpool to win the Final
Sounds about right but I think I want City to win this. We need them to somehow drop a point in the Premier League which is unlikely enough, but if the League is the only thing they've got left to play for then I expect its even less likely. If they go into the final games of the season knowing they've got the Champions League final coming up they might be more incentivised to rest some players or something ...
Re the local elections, and following on from Yougov.
I think that Wandsworth is a lot more than leaning Labour. I think that Labour will win the borough very comfortably.
Barnet, I think, comes down to whether Starmer has detoxified Labour sufficiently among Jewish voters. Labour should win a clear majority in the wards making up Chipping Barnet. It will turn on whether they can make headway in Hendon, and in Finchley & Golders Green.
Westminster should see Labour lead comfortably in terms of vote share, but like Kensington, the ward boundaries are drawn very favourably towards the Conservatives. Labour need a big lead to take that borough.
My feeling - and it's just that, not based on any knowledge - is that Jewish voters in Barnet left Labour quite reluctantly, and will return in sufficient numbers. In general, though, Labour looks likely to have a decent night in terms of polling numbers but few major gains to point to, and some local setbacks. The Tory collapse in the south may be more significant. But overall I don't think the elections are going to be a killer blow for Johnson.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
8.7 million watched last years champions league final
It was made free to watch, wasn't it? The Liverpool one was, so I already expect this year's will be.
I'm going to cancel my subscription now, should have a month ago so the month's notice expired now. Signed up for the Ashes but kept it for the Champions League, don't see any point paying for it going forwards now.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sprot free with my btinternet broadband 😁
I've now got it free via a Starmer Stream. Thats why he was illegally eating a curry with Nye Bevan, to set up internet streaming services.
It's hard to see how the Conservatives can do so unambiguously badly that Johnson has to have the whisky and revolver treatment. The underlying map sees to that, and there's always somewhere where a struggling government does well locally.
So the Johnson exit date question comes down to what it's always come down to:
Do enough Conservative MPs want to risk shooting at Johnson? They can bring him down whenever they want, if that's what they want to do. But if they wait for someone else to do the dirty work for them, they may have to wait a long time.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Water, electricity, gas, rail transport... now we're talking natural monopolies.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Football is not a natural monopoly, not even close.
It 100% is because only one channel shows the fixture, so every single fixture absolutely is monopolised.
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
Fancy Real to win this now, with home advantage and all the fervour
But Liverpool to win the Final
Sounds about right but I think I want City to win this. We need them to somehow drop a point in the Premier League which is unlikely enough, but if the League is the only thing they've got left to play for then I expect its even less likely. If they go into the final games of the season knowing they've got the Champions League final coming up they might be more incentivised to rest some players or something ...
Man City will be psychologically broken, and drop points elsewhere.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Water, electricity, gas, rail transport... now we're talking natural monopolies.
I can choose which company I get my electricity from - that is competition. I can choose which company I get my gas from - that is competition. I can choose which transport option I take, with different companies going from the train station too - that is competition.
I can't choose which company I get a fixture from. There is no choice, there is no competition, only one channel broadcasts it. The fact a different channel broadcasts different fixtures doesn't help me, it just means I need to pay for the same thing twice!
Fancy Real to win this now, with home advantage and all the fervour
But Liverpool to win the Final
Sounds about right but I think I want City to win this. We need them to somehow drop a point in the Premier League which is unlikely enough, but if the League is the only thing they've got left to play for then I expect its even less likely. If they go into the final games of the season knowing they've got the Champions League final coming up they might be more incentivised to rest some players or something ...
Man City will be psychologically broken, and drop points elsewhere.
Now that's a lot more in my ballpark than some of the ludicrous expectations management I've seen. Bit high for Labour. And low for the LD's. But in that region I would say.
Fancy Real to win this now, with home advantage and all the fervour
But Liverpool to win the Final
Sounds about right but I think I want City to win this. We need them to somehow drop a point in the Premier League which is unlikely enough, but if the League is the only thing they've got left to play for then I expect its even less likely. If they go into the final games of the season knowing they've got the Champions League final coming up they might be more incentivised to rest some players or something ...
Man City will be psychologically broken, and drop points elsewhere.
A first leg where they could and should have won 6-3 not 4-3, then a second leg where they were cruising to victory with a 2 goal lead with about six minutes left. And they lose?! (Or so it seems right now)
It's hard to see how the Conservatives can do so unambiguously badly that Johnson has to have the whisky and revolver treatment. The underlying map sees to that, and there's always somewhere where a struggling government does well locally.
So the Johnson exit date question comes down to what it's always come down to:
Do enough Conservative MPs want to risk shooting at Johnson? They can bring him down whenever they want, if that's what they want to do. But if they wait for someone else to do the dirty work for them, they may have to wait a long time.
Probably the smartest bet we can place tonight is Truss to No. 11 and Sunak to leave government. Other calls in the imminent post locals reshuffle harder to call with Patel resisting attempts to move her to party chair.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sprot free with my btinternet broadband 😁
I've now got it free via a Starmer Stream. Thats why he was illegally eating a curry with Nye Bevan, to set up internet streaming services.
You can't help yourself, can you? Nobody else wanted to talk about beergate lying lockdown buster Sir Keirio curry-guzzler, but you just had to drag him into the thread.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Football is not a natural monopoly, not even close.
It 100% is because only one channel shows the fixture, so every single fixture absolutely is monopolised.
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
You can watch a given team on Sky, BT, Prime Video, in different competitions, and sometimes in the same competitions. And there's no reason in principle that even the same game couldn't be on multiple channels. It's not a natural monopoly.
Each fixture is monopolised.
I agree that there's no reason in principle the same game couldn't be on multiple channels, but that wasn't the ruling they made. If it was, then there'd be actual competition, but it wasn't. Instead we get the worst of all worlds and need to pay twice for the same product.
https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1521902853778030596 Heavy fighting continues at Mariupol's Azovstal as of 18:00 EEST - Suspilne citing Azov-Kyiv co-commander Maksym Zhorin Communication was restored with the 🇺🇦military at Azovstal. Russians partially broke into the plant's territory from one direction…
… "It's the second day as the enemy broke into the premises of the plant. There are heavy bloody battles. The situation is extremely difficult, but in spite of everything we continue to carry out the order to keep the defense" - Azov Regiment Commander Lt-Col Denys Prokopenko.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sprot free with my btinternet broadband 😁
I've now got it free via a Starmer Stream. Thats why he was illegally eating a curry with Nye Bevan, to set up internet streaming services.
Ramsay MacDonald surely. And it was a Finnan haddock.
Labour is likely to advance in key battlegrounds in the local elections but may struggle to win significant numbers of new councils outright, according to a major new results projection by YouGov for Sky News.
Labour looks set to make slower progress tomorrow in the north of England than elsewhere in the local council elections, despite Sir Keir Starmer putting regaining the "red wall" lost in the 2019 general election at the top of his agenda.
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
I used to like it when I liked the success of English clubs. But they are all so international now, and as others have said, we see it at lest twice a year already, so I do now prefer not to have two English finalists.
Fancy Real to win this now, with home advantage and all the fervour
But Liverpool to win the Final
Sounds about right but I think I want City to win this. We need them to somehow drop a point in the Premier League which is unlikely enough, but if the League is the only thing they've got left to play for then I expect its even less likely. If they go into the final games of the season knowing they've got the Champions League final coming up they might be more incentivised to rest some players or something ...
Man City will be psychologically broken, and drop points elsewhere.
A first leg where they could and should have won 6-3 not 4-3, then a second leg where they were cruising to victory with a 2 goal lead with about six minutes left. And they lose?! (Or so it seems right now)
It will be painful in the extreme
They let in the only 2 shots on target in the 90 minutes too didn't they?
Exclusive YouGov poll for Sky News: 🔴 Wandsworth leaning Labour ⚪️ Westminster too close to call ⚪️ Barnet too close to call 🔴 Croydon will likely stay Labour 🔴 Southampton leaning Labour ⚪️ Worthing too close to call ⚪️ Crawley too close to call ⚪️ Hull too close to call
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sprot free with my btinternet broadband 😁
I've now got it free via a Starmer Stream. Thats why he was illegally eating a curry with Nye Bevan, to set up internet streaming services.
You can't help yourself, can you? Nobody else wanted to talk about beergate lying lockdown buster Sir Keirio curry-guzzler, but you just had to drag him into the thread.
Its called satire. I'm not debating it. I'm taking the piss out of it.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Football is not a natural monopoly, not even close.
It 100% is because only one channel shows the fixture, so every single fixture absolutely is monopolised.
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
You can watch a given team on Sky, BT, Prime Video, in different competitions, and sometimes in the same competitions. And there's no reason in principle that even the same game couldn't be on multiple channels. It's not a natural monopoly.
Each fixture is monopolised.
I agree that there's no reason in principle the same game couldn't be on multiple channels, but that wasn't the ruling they made. If it was, then there'd be actual competition, but it wasn't. Instead we get the worst of all worlds and need to pay twice for the same product.
Yes but the bidding war for games is how the money gets there to make the PL such a good league.
Re the local elections, and following on from Yougov.
I think that Wandsworth is a lot more than leaning Labour. I think that Labour will win the borough very comfortably.
Barnet, I think, comes down to whether Starmer has detoxified Labour sufficiently among Jewish voters. Labour should win a clear majority in the wards making up Chipping Barnet. It will turn on whether they can make headway in Hendon, and in Finchley & Golders Green.
Westminster should see Labour lead comfortably in terms of vote share, but like Kensington, the ward boundaries are drawn very favourably towards the Conservatives. Labour need a big lead to take that borough.
My feeling - and it's just that, not based on any knowledge - is that Jewish voters in Barnet left Labour quite reluctantly, and will return in sufficient numbers. In general, though, Labour looks likely to have a decent night in terms of polling numbers but few major gains to point to, and some local setbacks. The Tory collapse in the south may be more significant. But overall I don't think the elections are going to be a killer blow for Johnson.
Exclusive YouGov poll for Sky News: 🔴 Wandsworth leaning Labour ⚪️ Westminster too close to call ⚪️ Barnet too close to call 🔴 Croydon will likely stay Labour 🔴 Southampton leaning Labour ⚪️ Worthing too close to call ⚪️ Crawley too close to call ⚪️ Hull too close to call
I'd ban 'too close to call' as a prediction, from pundits at least (not pollsters). It's unfair, because many will be too close to call, but it'd be easy for use it as a crutch.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Football is not a natural monopoly, not even close.
It 100% is because only one channel shows the fixture, so every single fixture absolutely is monopolised.
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
You can watch a given team on Sky, BT, Prime Video, in different competitions, and sometimes in the same competitions. And there's no reason in principle that even the same game couldn't be on multiple channels. It's not a natural monopoly.
Each fixture is monopolised.
I agree that there's no reason in principle the same game couldn't be on multiple channels, but that wasn't the ruling they made. If it was, then there'd be actual competition, but it wasn't. Instead we get the worst of all worlds and need to pay twice for the same product.
I'm not saying the rights are done correctly, in truth it's something that doesn't bother me since I don't even have a tv licence so cannot watch anyway. I'm only saying the term natural monopoly doesn't really apply at all to football in general and not even to a game level.
Be careful, though. I think the big clubs win quite a premium from the way TV money works, and it might not be in your team's interests to have a different rights system.
Nowadays we are seeing a big increase in streaming for smaller clubs and other sports. You can watch every minute of say Swindon’s season online, should you be sufficiently mentally disturbed to want to. You can live stream all county cricket matches. The issue with the big ticket sports is the fragmentation of the coverage. I’d like to have just one provider for the sport I want, not have amazon, bt, sky and others all snatching bits of it. Frankly I watch less and less now. I think the idea of buying a ticket for a given match has appeal, rather than having to pay for a full subscription.
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
It is international. If English teams prove to be the two best teams it is no less international.
It is boring. We see that match a few times each season.
Yes, for a time it was looking like every major trophy available to English clubs might as well be decided in a miniseries of City/Liverpool games. Dull. Chelsea only have a chance in the FA Cup because of the draw.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
I seem to get BT Sprot free with my btinternet broadband 😁
I've now got it free via a Starmer Stream. Thats why he was illegally eating a curry with Nye Bevan, to set up internet streaming services.
You can't help yourself, can you? Nobody else wanted to talk about beergate lying lockdown buster Sir Keirio curry-guzzler, but you just had to drag him into the thread.
Its called satire. I'm not debating it. I'm taking the piss out of it.
Re the local elections, and following on from Yougov.
I think that Wandsworth is a lot more than leaning Labour. I think that Labour will win the borough very comfortably.
Barnet, I think, comes down to whether Starmer has detoxified Labour sufficiently among Jewish voters. Labour should win a clear majority in the wards making up Chipping Barnet. It will turn on whether they can make headway in Hendon, and in Finchley & Golders Green.
Westminster should see Labour lead comfortably in terms of vote share, but like Kensington, the ward boundaries are drawn very favourably towards the Conservatives. Labour need a big lead to take that borough.
My feeling - and it's just that, not based on any knowledge - is that Jewish voters in Barnet left Labour quite reluctantly, and will return in sufficient numbers. In general, though, Labour looks likely to have a decent night in terms of polling numbers but few major gains to point to, and some local setbacks. The Tory collapse in the south may be more significant. But overall I don't think the elections are going to be a killer blow for Johnson.
People find the notion of any bloc vote questionable, doesn't seem to stop it happening in practice. Presumably there simply are not that many places where any Jewish bloc vote, should it exist, would be of sufficient scale to make a difference.
Certainly many in Labour felt the cause was clear at the time.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Water, electricity, gas, rail transport... now we're talking natural monopolies.
I can choose which company I get my electricity from - that is competition. I can choose which company I get my gas from - that is competition. I can choose which transport option I take, with different companies going from the train station too - that is competition.
I can't choose which company I get a fixture from. There is no choice, there is no competition, only one channel broadcasts it. The fact a different channel broadcasts different fixtures doesn't help me, it just means I need to pay for the same thing twice!
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
It is international. If English teams prove to be the two best teams it is no less international.
It is boring. We see that match a few times each season.
Yes, for a time it was looking like every major trophy available to English clubs might as well be decided in a miniseries of City/Liverpool games. Dull. Chelsea only have a chance in the FA Cup because of the draw.
Man United will be back. And Newcastle are in the distance, with all that money
Thank God we have such a lively league. Bayern have just won their ninth title in a row; the Bundesliga is worse than the Scottish Premiership
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
It is international. If English teams prove to be the two best teams it is no less international.
It is boring. We see that match a few times each season.
That's a separate argument to 'CL is better when international' though. There's no way to avoid the possibility of clubs from the same country getting through to face each other unless you limit each nation to one.
Includes this remarkable anecdote. … Minor digression: I once pressed Scalia on this point, and he said as much: that it was BECAUSE there was no meaning of terms like liberty' that we could figure out that we had to rely on the extension of 'liberty' as understood by the framers. … 23/ So I asked him: are you saying that you, unlike the Framers, are a moral nihilist?, and he said: yes.
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Football is not a natural monopoly, not even close.
It 100% is because only one channel shows the fixture, so every single fixture absolutely is monopolised.
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
You can watch a given team on Sky, BT, Prime Video, in different competitions, and sometimes in the same competitions. And there's no reason in principle that even the same game couldn't be on multiple channels. It's not a natural monopoly.
Each fixture is monopolised.
I agree that there's no reason in principle the same game couldn't be on multiple channels, but that wasn't the ruling they made. If it was, then there'd be actual competition, but it wasn't. Instead we get the worst of all worlds and need to pay twice for the same product.
I'm not saying the rights are done correctly, in truth it's something that doesn't bother me since I don't even have a tv licence so cannot watch anyway. I'm only saying the term natural monopoly doesn't really apply at all to football in general and not even to a game level.
Be careful, though. I think the big clubs win quite a premium from the way TV money works, and it might not be in your team's interests to have a different rights system.
Nowadays we are seeing a big increase in streaming for smaller clubs and other sports. You can watch every minute of say Swindon’s season online, should you be sufficiently mentally disturbed to want to. You can live stream all county cricket matches. The issue with the big ticket sports is the fragmentation of the coverage. I’d like to have just one provider for the sport I want, not have amazon, bt, sky and others all snatching bits of it. Frankly I watch less and less now. I think the idea of buying a ticket for a given match has appeal, rather than having to pay for a full subscription.
Yeah. Watched my youngest bat for the 3rd XI in an away fixture live on YouTube. The days of sport as a unifying national event is over for all but the very biggest games. Even the Sunday afternoon live ITV Division One game in 1987 was a huge occasion. Now. You can take your pick.
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
It is international. If English teams prove to be the two best teams it is no less international.
It is boring. We see that match a few times each season.
Yes, for a time it was looking like every major trophy available to English clubs might as well be decided in a miniseries of City/Liverpool games. Dull. Chelsea only have a chance in the FA Cup because of the draw.
Man United will be back. And Newcastle are in the distance, with all that money
Thank God we have such a lively league. Bayern have just won their ninth title in a row; the Bundesliga is worse than the Scottish Premiership
I’ve long felt that Man Utd are in for decades of pain to match Liverpool’s slump in the 90s until recently. Reportedly the stadium is in poor shape, the owners are only interested in shirt sales and the ghost of fergie oppresses any manager foolish enough to take the job.
When I was a child that was how laundry was done. My mother would ring up, they would come round and collect all my father's shirts, sheets etc then return with them all cleaned, pressed and neatly folded.
No apps of course. But otherwise we are just rediscovering services we used to have before.
And as for @rcs1000's waste Uber, I was doing this for my street years ago. When I went to the Regis Road recycling centre I would ask neighbours if they had stuff to go there and would take it along, especially garden waste, rather than pay for Camden to collect it. In return other favours would be done for me.
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
It is international. If English teams prove to be the two best teams it is no less international.
It is boring. We see that match a few times each season.
That's a separate argument to 'CL is better when international' though. There's no way to avoid the possibility of clubs from the same country getting through to face each other unless you limit each nation to one.
I am not saying it should be banned, just that RM vs LFC is a more interesting match than the tedious psychodrama of MCFC vs LFC.
Includes this remarkable anecdote. … Minor digression: I once pressed Scalia on this point, and he said as much: that it was BECAUSE there was no meaning of terms like liberty' that we could figure out that we had to rely on the extension of 'liberty' as understood by the framers. … 23/ So I asked him: are you saying that you, unlike the Framers, are a moral nihilist?, and he said: yes.
One of the more astonishing moments of my life.
Surely America has a simple solution. The problem is too many young men depositing sperms inside young ladies. Vasectomies can be reversed, so simply sterilise all young American men at the age of 14 so that there are no unwanted pregnancies.
Then once they have demonstrated they are morally sound and financially secure they can appeal to a legal system largely run by women who can mandate them to have their vasectomies reversed.
What do you mean no? But you think men should interfere with women's bodies...
And since when did BT get exclusive rights to the Champions League? Why not just give it to Setanta or DAZN and have done with it so that nobody can watch it.
Bloody idiots in the EU insisting on "competition" resulting in football fans having to buy multiple licences to watch their sports. Some things are a natural monopoly and football, until we get general streaming, is one of them.
Football is not a natural monopoly, not even close.
It 100% is because only one channel shows the fixture, so every single fixture absolutely is monopolised.
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
You can watch a given team on Sky, BT, Prime Video, in different competitions, and sometimes in the same competitions. And there's no reason in principle that even the same game couldn't be on multiple channels. It's not a natural monopoly.
Each fixture is monopolised.
I agree that there's no reason in principle the same game couldn't be on multiple channels, but that wasn't the ruling they made. If it was, then there'd be actual competition, but it wasn't. Instead we get the worst of all worlds and need to pay twice for the same product.
I'm not saying the rights are done correctly, in truth it's something that doesn't bother me since I don't even have a tv licence so cannot watch anyway. I'm only saying the term natural monopoly doesn't really apply at all to football in general and not even to a game level.
Be careful, though. I think the big clubs win quite a premium from the way TV money works, and it might not be in your team's interests to have a different rights system.
Nowadays we are seeing a big increase in streaming for smaller clubs and other sports. You can watch every minute of say Swindon’s season online, should you be sufficiently mentally disturbed to want to. You can live stream all county cricket matches. The issue with the big ticket sports is the fragmentation of the coverage. I’d like to have just one provider for the sport I want, not have amazon, bt, sky and others all snatching bits of it. Frankly I watch less and less now. I think the idea of buying a ticket for a given match has appeal, rather than having to pay for a full subscription.
Yeah. Watched my youngest bat for the 3rd XI in an away fixture live on YouTube. The days of sport as a unifying national event is over for all but the very biggest games. Even the Sunday afternoon live ITV Division One game in 1987 was a huge occasion. Now. You can take your pick.
We were gutted that the live stream at Marshfield was turned off when the 3rds played at the main ground. That said I have no desire to see my ‘athletic’ attempts on camera... When I was a kid live TV sport was a treat. Now I just can’t get excited.
It's not great, given how many of these seats Labour won last time around but it is excusable as mid term blues etc.
Yup. Looking under the bonnet, it'll be pretty poor, but there will be enough to distract from that if the Conservatives want to be distracted.
Meanwhile, it looks like the first Mail front page in forever that isn't about beergate (Channel crossings, lefty lawyers instead), and the Telegraph story (retired Chief Constable thinks that Durham police probably need to reinvestigate...) looks like pretty thin gruel, really.
Damn, I love an all English final. But hopefully that will break their will elsewhere.
I hate an all English final. We watch that every season.CL is better when international.
It is international. If English teams prove to be the two best teams it is no less international.
It is boring. We see that match a few times each season.
That's a separate argument to 'CL is better when international' though. There's no way to avoid the possibility of clubs from the same country getting through to face each other unless you limit each nation to one.
I am not saying it should be banned, just that RM vs LFC is a more interesting match than the tedious psychodrama of MCFC vs LFC.
I'm only teasing, I get the argument we want something different than our regular leagues, but your first attempt at explaning that was just silly!
Shockingly the Wail is dropping currygate and instead is leading on the shocking news that leftie lawyers are threatening to sink Boris's brave Rwanda plan.
Shockingly the Wail is dropping currygate and instead is leading on the shocking news that leftie lawyers are threatening to sink Boris's brave Rwanda plan.
Ah, we've moved onto that phase of the Rwanda plan already then? Priti will be pleased.
Shockingly the Wail is dropping currygate and instead is leading on the shocking news that leftie lawyers are threatening to sink Boris's brave Rwanda plan.
Comments
I think that Wandsworth is a lot more than leaning Labour. I think that Labour will win the borough very comfortably.
Barnet, I think, comes down to whether Starmer has detoxified Labour sufficiently among Jewish voters. Labour should win a clear majority in the wards making up Chipping Barnet. It will turn on whether they can make headway in Hendon, and in Finchley & Golders Green.
Westminster should see Labour lead comfortably in terms of vote share, but like Kensington, the ward boundaries are drawn very favourably towards the Conservatives. Labour need a big lead to take that borough.
2 - 2 (5 - 5)
Extra time on now.
Posting 50 times a day that NOBODY IS POSTING ABOUT THE STORY I AM POSTING ABOUT, NOBODY, DO YOU HEAR ME? is deep into Cretan paradox country
But Liverpool to win the Final
I'm going to cancel my subscription now, should have a month ago so the month's notice expired now. Signed up for the Ashes but kept it for the Champions League, don't see any point paying for it going forwards now.
Penalty to Madrid! What drama!
CON: -206
LAB: +147
LDEM: +34
GRN: +35
SNP: -12
PC: -14
Drilldown:
sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/05/our-lo…
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1521957860887912448
So the Johnson exit date question comes down to what it's always come down to:
Do enough Conservative MPs want to risk shooting at Johnson? They can bring him down whenever they want, if that's what they want to do. But if they wait for someone else to do the dirty work for them, they may have to wait a long time.
CON: -206
LAB: +147
LDEM: +34
GRN: +35
SNP: -12
PC: -14
Drilldown:
https://sotn.newstatesman.com/2022/05/our-local-election-forecast-for-2022/ https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1521957860887912448/photo/1
"Competition" would be me being able to watch Liverpool fixtures on my choice of Sky or BT. Having to pay for both isn't competition.
I can choose which company I get my gas from - that is competition.
I can choose which transport option I take, with different companies going from the train station too - that is competition.
I can't choose which company I get a fixture from. There is no choice, there is no competition, only one channel broadcasts it. The fact a different channel broadcasts different fixtures doesn't help me, it just means I need to pay for the same thing twice!
Bit high for Labour. And low for the LD's. But in that region I would say.
Question is can Liverpool beat Man City. I am no Liverpool fan but maybe they can! 👍
It will be painful in the extreme
I agree that there's no reason in principle the same game couldn't be on multiple channels, but that wasn't the ruling they made. If it was, then there'd be actual competition, but it wasn't. Instead we get the worst of all worlds and need to pay twice for the same product.
https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1521902853778030596
Heavy fighting continues at Mariupol's Azovstal as of 18:00 EEST - Suspilne citing Azov-Kyiv co-commander Maksym Zhorin
Communication was restored with the 🇺🇦military at Azovstal. Russians partially broke into the plant's territory from one direction…
… "It's the second day as the enemy broke into the premises of the plant. There are heavy bloody battles. The situation is extremely difficult, but in spite of everything we continue to carry out the order to keep the defense" - Azov Regiment Commander Lt-Col Denys Prokopenko.
Labour looks set to make slower progress tomorrow in the north of England than elsewhere in the local council elections, despite Sir Keir Starmer putting regaining the "red wall" lost in the 2019 general election at the top of his agenda.
https://news.sky.com/story/local-elections-2022-labour-to-advance-in-key-battlegrounds-but-struggle-to-win-many-councils-outright-poll-suggests-12605545
🔴 Wandsworth leaning Labour
⚪️ Westminster too close to call
⚪️ Barnet too close to call
🔴 Croydon will likely stay Labour
🔴 Southampton leaning Labour
⚪️ Worthing too close to call
⚪️ Crawley too close to call
⚪️ Hull too close to call
https://twitter.com/itssophiemorris/status/1521955547767050243
Also, Real are just not that good
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnet_London_Borough_Council_elections
It's still pretty poor, mind.
The issue with the big ticket sports is the fragmentation of the coverage. I’d like to have just one provider for the sport I want, not have amazon, bt, sky and others all snatching bits of it. Frankly I watch less and less now. I think the idea of buying a ticket for a given match has appeal, rather than having to pay for a full subscription.
I genuinely have no clue
But you have no skin in the game. Phew.
Certainly many in Labour felt the cause was clear at the time.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/may/04/labour-antisemitism-scandal-blamed-for-tory-win-in-barnet
Thank God we have such a lively league. Bayern have just won their ninth title in a row; the Bundesliga is worse than the Scottish Premiership
https://twitter.com/hilzoy/status/1521869746878177281
Includes this remarkable anecdote.
… Minor digression: I once pressed Scalia on this point, and he said as much: that it was BECAUSE there was no meaning of terms like liberty' that we could figure out that we had to rely on the extension of 'liberty' as understood by the framers.
… 23/ So I asked him: are you saying that you, unlike the Framers, are a moral nihilist?, and he said: yes.
One of the more astonishing moments of my life.
The days of sport as a unifying national event is over for all but the very biggest games.
Even the Sunday afternoon live ITV Division One game in 1987 was a huge occasion.
Now. You can take your pick.
When I was a child that was how laundry was done. My mother would ring up, they would come round and collect all my father's shirts, sheets etc then return with them all cleaned, pressed and neatly folded.
No apps of course. But otherwise we are just rediscovering services we used to have before.
And as for @rcs1000's waste Uber, I was doing this for my street years ago. When I went to the Regis Road recycling centre I would ask neighbours if they had stuff to go there and would take it along, especially garden waste, rather than pay for Camden to collect it. In return other favours would be done for me.
Then once they have demonstrated they are morally sound and financially secure they can appeal to a legal system largely run by women who can mandate them to have their vasectomies reversed.
What do you mean no? But you think men should interfere with women's bodies...
When I was a kid live TV sport was a treat. Now I just can’t get excited.
Meanwhile, it looks like the first Mail front page in forever that isn't about beergate (Channel crossings, lefty lawyers instead), and the Telegraph story (retired Chief Constable thinks that Durham police probably need to reinvestigate...) looks like pretty thin gruel, really.
https://www.tomorrowspapers.co.uk/
Of course 'people don't want to watch X, they want to watch the top teams play each other' was also the pitch of the Super League.