Hooray, we can all remain Francophiles for the next 5 years at least – politicalbetting.com
Emmanuel Macron will become the first French president in 20 years to win a second term after an official vote projection suggested he has seen off the challenge from Marine Le Pen https://t.co/cqrypIRUSI
It already is de facto involvement with NATO arming Ukrainian and it cannot be ruled out that NATO will be drawn into the conflict at some time
Just repeating your opinion does not make it an unqualified fact in this intractable and unpredictable war, sadly
The Cold War was a series of proxy conflicts where sometimes the USA and Soviet Union would be arming one side or both sides. Ukraine is more like Vietnam or Afghanistan in which the forces of one of the superpowers are faced with what should be an inferior force but which is armed and supplied by the other superpower.
The results of both of those conflicts should give Ukraine some encouragement.
We have to avoid the temptation to become directly involved.
We are discussing this without considering one important thing. What is NATO's war aim? We are all-but belligerent, we must be working towards some end.
The end is the defence of the western democratic, human rights, liberal economics ideal in a rules-based world, and defending it at the first, not last domino. That is a defensive posture; NATO is not being an aggressor.
Yes, but is it the defeat of Russia, the destruction of their Army of Ukraine, a truce on 2014 borders, a bullet in the back of Putin's head, etc, etc.
Ideally, it would result in a Russia who wants to join, and is fully committed to joining that western democratic, human rights, liberal economics ideal in a rules-based world. But there are many acceptable alternatives that fall short of that, where Russia is defanged, required to leave Ukraine and is effectively removed as a threat for the foreseeable.
To many of the hard core Greater Russian Nationalists, the above is tantamount to the extinction of Russia -
Vilain : Respect is everything. Without respect, we are just people. Common, shitty people.
Nick Clegg this could have been you if you hadn’t formed the coalition.
What, president of France?
After the failure and early collapse of the Cameron minority administration, the LibDem on march power there way to a LD led coalition in the post riot 2011 election.
Nick Clegg this could have been you if you hadn’t formed the coalition.
What, president of France?
After the failure and early collapse of the Cameron minority administration, the LibDem on march power there way to a LD led coalition in the post riot 2011 election.
My guess is that Cameron, if left to form a minority administration, would have sought a fresh election at an opportune moment.
Nick Clegg this could have been you if you hadn’t formed the coalition.
What, president of France?
After the failure and early collapse of the Cameron minority administration, the LibDem on march power there way to a LD led coalition in the post riot 2011 election.
Surely Cameron would have called another election for October, with the benefits of incumbency.
2017: Macron 67.0% Le Pen 33.0% 2022: Macron 54.2% Le Pen 45.7%
Réunion & Mayotte landslides for Le Pen
I think one poster said Mayotte is 99% Muslim.
But inundated by immigration from the Comoros. Some estimates that native residents are a minority on the island. And, like some of the rest of overseas France, it is poor and wishes to kick the incumbent, even if that means in some cases a massive Mélenchon - Le Pen transfer.
On the subject of Mayotte and the Comoros, your friendly reminder that the Comoros was conquered, AFTER decolonisation, by a French mercenary with a few dozen men.
From previous thread: Tim T - Thanks for this: "@State go away is not entirely correct. There was an instance in which a Russian Lt Col was required to fire nuclear weapons according to protocol but refused to follow standing orders.
I was vaguely aware of that first example, but couldn't remember enough to find it quickly;
From your Wikipedia link:
Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov (Russian: Станисла́в Евгра́фович Петро́в; 7 September 1939 – 19 May 2017) was a lieutenant colonel of the Soviet Air Defence Forces who played a key role in the 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident.[1] On 26 September 1983, three weeks after the Soviet military had shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007, Petrov was the duty officer at the command center for the Oko nuclear early-warning system when the system reported that a missile had been launched from the United States, followed by up to five more. Petrov judged the reports to be a false alarm.[2]
His subsequent decision to disobey orders, against Soviet military protocol,[3] is credited with having prevented an erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its NATO allies that could have resulted in a large-scale nuclear war which could have wiped out half of the population of the countries involved.
(My apologies for the off-topic comments, but I think nuclear war is an important enough subject to warrant an interruption or two.)
Wonder if Johnson would really prefer Le Pen. They are similar in many ways, a point @Roger was making on the previous thread.
He would not, because Le Pen is hostile towards NATO.
Makes sense. And I suppose also just because you are like someone it doesn't mean you like them. I am guessing Johnson doesn't like Macron much either - seems to be the settled view of those in his camp - cf all those Spectator hatchet jobs on him.
Nick Clegg this could have been you if you hadn’t formed the coalition.
What, president of France?
After the failure and early collapse of the Cameron minority administration, the LibDem on march power there way to a LD led coalition in the post riot 2011 election.
Surely Cameron would have called another election for October, with the benefits of incumbency.
And lost. Arguably preferable for him compared to how it actually turned out.
From previous thread: Tim T - Thanks for this: "@State go away is not entirely correct. There was an instance in which a Russian Lt Col was required to fire nuclear weapons according to protocol but refused to follow standing orders.
I was vaguely aware of that first example, but couldn't remember enough to find it quickly;
From your Wikipedia link:
Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov (Russian: Станисла́в Евгра́фович Петро́в; 7 September 1939 – 19 May 2017) was a lieutenant colonel of the Soviet Air Defence Forces who played a key role in the 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident.[1] On 26 September 1983, three weeks after the Soviet military had shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007, Petrov was the duty officer at the command center for the Oko nuclear early-warning system when the system reported that a missile had been launched from the United States, followed by up to five more. Petrov judged the reports to be a false alarm.[2]
His subsequent decision to disobey orders, against Soviet military protocol,[3] is credited with having prevented an erroneous retaliatory nuclear attack on the United States and its NATO allies that could have resulted in a large-scale nuclear war which could have wiped out half of the population of the countries involved.
(My apologies for the off-topic comments, but I think nuclear war is an important enough subject to warrant an interruption or two.)
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
More than 40% of Americans voted for something worse.
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
Hasn't MLP tacked quite a long way towards the mainstream this time? Enough to leave a chunky space to her right, occupied by Zemmour. Not enough to win, and it's hard to see how she can go much further in that direction.
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
More than 40% of Americans voted for something worse.
Yes I agree with that too. But Roger's a complete pratt for putting them in the same category as Johnson. Le Pen is more like a Nick Griffin character.
It's great that Macron has won, but when a fascist gets 40% of the vote nobody should be celebrating. It's too close to a catastrophe for anything more than temporary relief.
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
Hasn't MLP tacked quite a long way towards the mainstream this time? Enough to leave a chunky space to her right, occupied by Zemmour. Not enough to win, and it's hard to see how she can go much further in that direction.
Yes, but I for one do not believe that it is ever safe to assume the leopard has changed his spots. There will be too many of her followers seeing her as a means to an end.
France 24 now estimating M 58.3. to 58.8. Painfully close.
Interesting given the (very few) results so far suggest more of a swing against Macron.
You have lost, and lost badly.
Another appalling tip from you ramping the right. I suggest you refrain from promoting your political betting tips in future.
Yawn. Do you ever put betting tips on yourself?
Ps how's your "Virginia would never go Republican" comment looking?
PPS oh yes, and Alaska could go Democrat - LOL. Standing in a greenhouse...
People can give betting tips that turn out to be wrong. To give any credence to somebody's tips you need to believe that they are acting dispassionately. As far as I can recall every betting comment I have ever seen from you concerning Trump and now Le Pen have always turned out to be overestimates in their favour.
Straws in the wind can be very useful but not when they always seem to point in the same direction.
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
Though hasn't French politics been polarised for about 2 1/2 cenuries between internationalist Jacobins and chauvinistic catholic conservatives?
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
I would say Johnson and Le Pen ended up in a similar political space, having come on different journeys, with Le Pen softening the fascist tendencies of her inheritance while Johnson rode the populist tiger. They are both insurgents from within the elite, they have similar views of their respective countries' place in the world and how other countries should deal with them, similar views on the role of the State, sovereignty in their view is absolute and what they decide it to be, both previously rather keen on Trump and Putin (but Johnson is better at the pivot). Both are opportunists and chaotic in their behaviours.
France 24 now estimating M 58.3. to 58.8. Painfully close.
Interesting given the (very few) results so far suggest more of a swing against Macron.
You have lost, and lost badly.
Another appalling tip from you ramping the right. I suggest you refrain from promoting your political betting tips in future.
Yawn. Do you ever put betting tips on yourself?
Ps how's your "Virginia would never go Republican" comment looking?
PPS oh yes, and Alaska could go Democrat - LOL. Standing in a greenhouse...
People can give betting tips that turn out to be wrong. To give any credence to somebody's tips you need to believe that they are acting dispassionately. As far as I can recall every betting comment I have ever seen from you concerning Trump and now Le Pen have always turned out to be overestimates in their favour.
Straws in the wind can be very useful but not when they always seem to point in the same direction.
France 24 now estimating M 58.3. to 58.8. Painfully close.
Interesting given the (very few) results so far suggest more of a swing against Macron.
You have lost, and lost badly.
Another appalling tip from you ramping the right. I suggest you refrain from promoting your political betting tips in future.
Yawn. Do you ever put betting tips on yourself?
Ps how's your "Virginia would never go Republican" comment looking?
PPS oh yes, and Alaska could go Democrat - LOL. Standing in a greenhouse...
People can give betting tips that turn out to be wrong. To give any credence to somebody's tips you need to believe that they are acting dispassionately. As far as I can recall every betting comment I have ever seen from you concerning Trump and now Le Pen have always turned out to be overestimates in their favour.
Straws in the wind can be very useful but not when they always seem to point in the same direction.
Works both ways. There are a fair few posters on here who were ramping up the idea in the 2020 GE that the Democrats were going to win places like South Carolina and even Alaska, such as @Anabobazina. But for some reasons - presumably because it's in line with your political views - you give them more leeway.
For the record, I said 2020 in the US would be similar to 2016. Certainly more true than those posters who were saying Biden was in for a landslide, of which there were a few. I also said on here that I thought Le Pen would be bad for the world if she won.
As a general point, you seem to have the implicit view that, if you are left wing, you are more dispassionate. Sorry to tell you, that is wrong.
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
More than 40% of Americans voted for something worse.
They voted for the GOP which Trump had managed to get control over.
Which is why I wonder how well MLP would have done if she had emerged from the traditional, rather than the extreme, right
There you have it. A straight line from Farage through Johnson to Le Pen. France have rejected the far right. The UK have embraced it
You really are a massive dope. Johnson is a poor PM, but not even in the same league as Le Pen. It's completely nuts that 40% of the French voters will back a fascist.
I would say Johnson and Le Pen ended up in a similar political space, having come on different journeys, with Le Pen softening the fascist tendencies of her inheritance while Johnson rode the populist tiger. They are both insurgents from within the elite, they have similar views of their respective countries' place in the world and how other countries should deal with them, similar views on the role of the State, sovereignty in their view is absolute and what they decide it to be, both previously rather keen on Trump and Putin (but Johnson is better at the pivot). Both are opportunists and chaotic in their behaviours.
Johnson leads a mainstream party, Le Pen leads fascists.
Comments
Thoughts.
And prayers.
Le Pen ❌
Johnson 🤞
2017: Macron 67.0% Le Pen 33.0%
2022: Macron 54.2% Le Pen 45.7%
Réunion & Mayotte landslides for Le Pen
So happy that my parents gave me the chance to keep my EU passport .
Not even close, never mind “painfully close”.
2017: Macron 69.8% Le Pen 30.2%
2022: Macron 56.1% Le Pen 43.9%
2017: Macron 58.5% Le Pen 41.5%
2022: Macron 51.5% Le Pen 48.6%
Another appalling tip from you ramping the right. I suggest you refrain from promoting your political betting tips in future.
😂
Anyone know how that compares with 2017?
Note that Shanghai lockdown means that approx 5k French citizens were NOT able to vote in 2nd round.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_French_presidential_election
2017 - Macron 58.5%, Le Pen 41.5%
Macron down 10%
Ps how's your "Virginia would never go Republican" comment looking?
PPS oh yes, and Alaska could go Democrat - LOL. Standing in a greenhouse...
Lt Col Stanislav Petrov: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov "
I was vaguely aware of that first example, but couldn't remember enough to find it quickly;
From your Wikipedia link: (My apologies for the off-topic comments, but I think nuclear war is an important enough subject to warrant an interruption or two.)
Really? You have money on it?
2017: Macron 50.6%
2022: Macron 41.7%
Haute-Corse
2017: Macron 52.3%
2022: Macron 42.1%
It's great that Macron has won, but when a fascist gets 40% of the vote nobody should be celebrating. It's too close to a catastrophe for anything more than temporary relief.
2022
Macron 56,5%
Le Pen 43.5%
2017
Macron 68.7%
Le Pen 31.3%
Macron down 12%
2017: Macron 61.6%
2022: Macron 55.1%
Eure-et-Loir
2017: Macron 60.3%
2022: Macron 53.3%
I am delighted to be wrong.
Happy to lose my £10 on Le Pen.
Straws in the wind can be very useful but not when they always seem to point in the same direction.
2022
Marcon 60%
Le Pen 40%
2017
Macron 72.8%
Le Pen 27.2
Taking a quick look, it looks like Macron is relatively outperforming the overall dip in the East but doing worse in the South.
2017: Macron 50.5%
2022: Macron 43.0%
Meuse
2017: Macron 51.6%
2022: Macron 44.4%
2017: Macron 63.1%
2022: Macron 51.1%
(Close to where our intrepid galloping gourmand has been squirming with the toads, or some such)
For the record, I said 2020 in the US would be similar to 2016. Certainly more true than those posters who were saying Biden was in for a landslide, of which there were a few. I also said on here that I thought Le Pen would be bad for the world if she won.
As a general point, you seem to have the implicit view that, if you are left wing, you are more dispassionate. Sorry to tell you, that is wrong.
2017: Macron 61.4%
2022: Macron 53.1%
Which is why I wonder how well MLP would have done if she had emerged from the traditional, rather than the extreme, right
2022 Macron 51.5%
2017 Macron 64.3%
Vosges
2022 Macron 47.6%
2017 Macron 55.3%
2017: Macron 71.0%
2022: Macron 59.2%