Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

The fog of war – politicalbetting.com

1235716

Comments

  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    tlg86 said:

    BiB - you seem to be assuming that they are welcoming the invasion. One of our own posters with a personal interest poured cold water on that idea this morning.
    I don't make any such assumption.

    Almost every Russian I know has said the invasion is wrong.

    That does not alter the fact that there is a Russian minority in the country of Ukraine. You can be Russian and not support the invasion.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,568

    We need to be energy secure - in surplus if possible. If that comes from good renewables, so much the better. But if it comes from fuels which dare not speak their name, we just have to live with it for the time being.
    One must be mindful of the future, but not at the expense of the present.

    Actually it was Qui-Gonn Jinn who said that and he was wrong, but only in the extent - some cost in the present is justifiable, even potentially significant cost, but the present concerns cannot simply be ignored either, not when they are so vital.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,309

    You seem to think I am supporting Putin in his wilder ravings. I am not.

    I am trying to point out a resolution of a situation that now seems even more incredibly dangerous than it was a few days ago.
    Man, an excuser of Putin and I just thought you were an apologist for Andrew RT Davies.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    Should also mention because it isn't being mentioned enough elsewhere that the Russian central bank have appealed for calm after so many people tried to get their money out of ATMs.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,367

    Saw this shared by one of my lefty friends on facebook. Hopefully the Stop the War Coalition are becoming isolated on the British Left.

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/a-letter-to-the-western-left-from-kyiv/

    I'm not a Socialist, so there are bits of that I disagree with, but it's an excellent piece.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,938
    edited February 2022
    "Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelinskiy has been talking about the prospect of talks with Russian officials planned to take place close to the border with Belarus, Reuters reports. It has the following lines so far:

    Zelinskiy said talks with Belarus leader Alexander Lukashenko were “very substantive”.
    He said he doesn’t want troops to move from Belarus to Ukraine and Lukashenko assured him of this
    Zelinskiy said we all need to act pragmatically to achieve our goal and he said Ukraine’s goal was territorial integrity."

    Interesting. Zelenskiy is sounding very cool-headed, balanced and sober here.

    Maybe we're not all going to be frazzled after all !
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,536

    Like their US GOP comrades assembled at CPAC, UK Tories would rather rave about dangers of Woke than wake up to the Putinist threat abroad AND at home.

    Thus bending over backwards giving aid and comfort to their spiritual leader - Vladimir Putin.

    Side note - keep your eye on Hungary, where Viktor Orban is clearly hoping to get some goodies out of the deal now going down. Including (I'm guessing) "autonomy" for Sub (or Trans) Carpathia, part of which has ethnic-Hungarian majority.

    Utter rubbish.
  • Surely yours truly is NOT alone, in thinking "PJohnson" is a Putinist bot?

    "I speak from a deep knowledge of history and human nature...my concern is humanity as a whole"

    Take your knowledge and concern . . . and shove 'em where the sun don't shine.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,568

    I see the Immunologists on here have become Generals :D

    Yes, people need to not over assume their own ability to assess these matters, but as a general point there's nothign wrong with people seeking to discuss and debate matters of imminology or conflict, so long as they seek out relevant info and can acknowledge their own shortcomings.

    The implications of such blanket comments is that no one could ever say anything beyond the areas they are expert in, and even that doesn't work when so much is still contested.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,705

    The bloke Sky News have hired to do the military analysis.....lets just say he does a great job of scaring the shit out of everybody....next slide please...yes well if Russia want they can deploy this....that will take out a city block...next slide please....a step up from that this, 5 of these will take out a city....next slide please....and after that....these can take out the cities anywhere in the Western world...next slide....no that's all we have time for, thank you.

    Is it Chris Parry? He is awesome, one of the best
  • ping said:

    This is no time for a lightweight like truss as FS.

    Needs to be replaced with Hunt(?) or someone else with gravitas and experience (May?) ASAP

    yes ,much as I like her and perhaps share her more laissez faire views on things I do think she made a silly and not needed comment on saying brits could join up to fight in Ukraine. Perhaps not a big mistake but one that shows she is not a cool head which is needed at this time. Boris needs to get rid of anyone who is not competent in a key position with this issue -forget optics , forget diversity , forget friendship , this is bigger
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    I am expecting some big, big Conservative VI leads. Circumstances are currently Johnson's friend.
    They are not. See header. This helps him look good on telly for a bit but 1. The parallel with another narcissistic leader determined to hang on at all costs is increasingly embarrassing 2. We are screwing up on a number of fronts eg visas for Ukrainians 3. His relationship with sleazy Russian money will come under the microscope 4. Partygate has not gone away. If our attention to Russia remains at this level of intensity for another 2 weeks it will be because of events which mean we will all be little heaps of radioactive ash by Easter anyway.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    Man, an excuser of Putin and I just thought you were an apologist for Andrew RT Davies.
    Well, 'RT' has discovered a silver lining :)

    Further sanctions may well be needed, and I add my voice to calls for UEFA to strip Russia of the privilege of hosting the Champions League final.

    I appreciate that lots of planning goes into this event, but there are plenty of venues experienced in hosting it, including the Principality Stadium, so changing the venue should be relatively straightforward
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,676
    algarkirk said:

    For now, but they will be back. SKS is rightly using the situation to impose a little discipline of ultra left MPs, getting them to withdraw their signing of STW petition/letter attacking NATO.

    The tactic of one ultra left MP has been to suddenly start describing the Russians as 'ultra right wing' as cover for not giving our enemies comfort for the moment. Though the absolute Spartist Laura Pidcock is yet to tweet any support for Ukraine or opposition to Russia since the invasion. TBF most of the ultra left have given themselves a little shelter from the storm with Corbyn like affirmations of peacenikery.

    Full support for our enemies and full hostility to our allies will resume in due course.

    Not really.The left is instinctively critical of NATO, because it was seen as part of the US concept of the world, but it's a long time since they were supportive of Putin's Russia, with its far-right mates from Trump to Bolsanaro - I suspect you're so accustomed to thinking that Nato-sceptical means pro-Russian that you've not noticed. What *has* changed is that the left has started to see the point of NATO. When John McDonnell told our CLP meeting last week that he favoured sending NATO reinforcements to countries bordering Russia, that was something I don't think you'd have heard in the past.

    Curiously, a side-effect of Putin's aggression has been to heal some of the division between the centre and left. I have lots of left-wing friends, but I've not heard one criticise Starmer for giving full support for British aid to Ukraine. In fact I'm a bit unusual in not favouring banning RT.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,568

    "Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelinskiy has been talking about the prospect of talks with Russian officials planned to take place close to the border with Belarus, Reuters reports. It has the following lines so far:

    Zelinskiy said talks with Belarus leader Alexander Lukashenko were “very substantive”.
    He said he doesn’t want troops to move from Belarus to Ukraine and Lukashenko assured him of this
    Zelinskiy said we all need to act pragmatically to achieve our goal and he said Ukraine’s goal was territorial integrity."

    Interesting. Zelenskiy is sounding very cool-headed, balanced and sober here.

    Maybe we're not all going to be frazzled after all !

    Thus far he does not seem a fool. He and his country are prepared to fight, which is essential to get the other side talking, but if a way can be had to acceptably limit damage it seems he would try. It would be interesting how well he can bring his country with him if that path does prove viable.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    Perhaps the endgame here is Russia in NATO. To protect against… China

  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,491
    edited February 2022
    philiph said:

    Is it Chris Parry? He is awesome, one of the best
    It was General Sir Richard Barrons today with the clicker.

    I know they have had Chris Parry on as well.

    It begs the question why they have got two proper experts on to talk about the confliction, but we had to put with unqualified people doing the "info board" during COVID.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,536
    alex_ said:

    Perhaps the endgame here is Russia in NATO. To protect against… China

    That’s 12D chess!
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,357

    Like their US GOP comrades assembled at CPAC, UK Tories would rather rave about dangers of Woke than wake up to the Putinist threat abroad AND at home.

    Thus bending over backwards giving aid and comfort to their spiritual leader - Vladimir Putin.

    Side note - keep your eye on Hungary, where Viktor Orban is clearly hoping to get some goodies out of the deal now going down. Including (I'm guessing) "autonomy" for Sub (or Trans) Carpathia, part of which has ethnic-Hungarian majority.

    Perhaps you should stick to commenting on Washington politics?
  • BurgessianBurgessian Posts: 2,979
    A few possibly contrarian thoughts.

    Putin, in his mind, found Russia weak, diminished, and held in contempt.

    Since then, he has annexed Crimea and turned Belarus into a client state.

    So far as I can see, there is nothing to prevent him from dismembering Ukraine and permanently taking over the East part of the country, thus adding it to Crimea and Belarus.

    The West will huff and puff but can't do much about it. Sure, Russia will endure economic hardship but Putin won't much care about that. Anyway, Russians have put up with far worse.

    When he goes, Russia will be strong, enlarged and feared.

    As I say, contrarian.

    PS. Anyone taking reassurance from the way the invasion is going, bear this in mind. Russian campaigns always go horribly wrong. Their troops (and civilians) go through the meatgrinder. But Mother Russia endures.
    PPS. Putin I suspect looks at himself as a linear descendant of previous Russian leaders. He sees himself in the line of Stalin, Alexander I, Catherine the Great, Peter the Great. Autocrats all, who couldn't give a fig for human suffering. He's not interested in being the natural successor to Gorbachev, Kerensky and Nicholas II.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,939

    Like their US GOP comrades assembled at CPAC, UK Tories would rather rave about dangers of Woke than wake up to the Putinist threat abroad AND at home.

    Thus bending over backwards giving aid and comfort to their spiritual leader - Vladimir Putin.

    Side note - keep your eye on Hungary, where Viktor Orban is clearly hoping to get some goodies out of the deal now going down. Including (I'm guessing) "autonomy" for Sub (or Trans) Carpathia, part of which has ethnic-Hungarian majority.

    He's got a re-election race to fight.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    yes ,much as I like her and perhaps share her more laissez faire views on things I do think she made a silly and not needed comment on saying brits could join up to fight in Ukraine. Perhaps not a big mistake but one that shows she is not a cool head which is needed at this time. Boris needs to get rid of anyone who is not competent in a key position with this issue -forget optics , forget diversity , forget friendship , this is bigger
    I worry about the fact that random ministers are allowed to freerange on the morning interview rounds. OK in normal times but sometimes spokesmen need to speak with confidence of being fully briefed.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,815
    FPT:
    Dura_Ace said:

    Helicopter carriers like the Japanese Izumo class would have been a great fit for the RN.

    The French defence establishment like your idea. Their latest wheeze for reducing the cost of the CdG replacement (PANG) is to build a second one for the EU. German/Dutch/Belgian crew with Italian/Spanish air wing.
    I think the original intended destination of those carriers was the EU defence force - its the only way they made sense to me. So interested to hear what you say, and not surprised it's happening, and yes, I do think the EU/France would have been tickled pink to get one of the carriers 'free' and would probably have been a lot kinder to our exporters and people with ham sandwiches in their cabins in return.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,568

    Like their US GOP comrades assembled at CPAC, UK Tories would rather rave about dangers of Woke than wake up to the Putinist threat abroad AND at home.

    Thus bending over backwards giving aid and comfort to their spiritual leader - Vladimir Putin.

    Side note - keep your eye on Hungary, where Viktor Orban is clearly hoping to get some goodies out of the deal now going down. Including (I'm guessing) "autonomy" for Sub (or Trans) Carpathia, part of which has ethnic-Hungarian majority.

    Being too open to Russian money and not a fan of 'woke' matters does not equal regarding or in effect treating Putin as a spiritual leader. That's too direct a connection.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 9,768
    rcs1000 said:

    He was absolutely backed into a corner by Ukraine doing... doing... doing... ummm... nothing at all.
    That was incredibly passive-aggressive of them
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,118
    Second, we will ban the Kremlin’s media machine in the EU.
     
    The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, and their subsidiaries,
    will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war.
     
    We are developing tools to ban their toxic and harmful disinformation in Europe. https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1497973706831929348/photo/1
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,386

    If you want to believed whilst spreading lies on a uk political blog, why on earth would you start by choosing the name Johnson.....
    He skimped a bit on his preparatory research, and thought the name PJohnson would be nicely inconspicuous.
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,045

    Surely yours truly is NOT alone, in thinking "PJohnson" is a Putinist bot?

    "I speak from a deep knowledge of history and human nature...my concern is humanity as a whole"

    Take your knowledge and concern . . . and shove 'em where the sun don't shine.

    Oh, we all know it. It’s been obvious for a while.
    We’re keeping him going for three reasons:

    1: He provides the opportunity to publicly shoot down Putinist lies (and thus achieve the opposite of what he wants. Much like his boss, really)
    2: Keeping him occupied here with zero benefit to him or his employers means less opportunity to peddle lies elsewhere.
    3: It’s fun to wind him up.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,650
    edited February 2022
    Taz said:

    Agreed, but the green lobby won’t allow it. High gas prices are desirable to ensure moving away from gas. They don’t care about the effect on people. Renewables are the desired end game but we don’t want to impoverish people getting there.
    It seems a very good reason for preserving some oil/gas fields, or opening up a new one or two.

    'Excuses' available include helping Germany out of the hole it has currently dug for itself.

    It is very notable though seldom mentioned that Energy Supplies have been left out of the EU sanctions package, like silk scarves from Milan. I make it that Nordstream 1 is worth about a billion a week to Russia.

    If it is to go in, someone needs to build Germany a Plan B.
  • Scott_xP said:

    Second, we will ban the Kremlin’s media machine in the EU.
     
    The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, and their subsidiaries,
    will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war.
     
    We are developing tools to ban their toxic and harmful disinformation in Europe. https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1497973706831929348/photo/1

    I wonder if YouTube, Twitter, etc will ban them?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,809
    edited February 2022
    algarkirk said:

    Though Kinabalu's theory fails an interesting test: No madman has used it yet, including the N Korea regime, and the longer time goes on without use the less plausible is the theory, and the more plausible is the possibility that people other than madmen having it deters madmen and others too.
    Well there's - I hope! - much time still to flow in human affairs. And we have a situation right now that might provide some evidence either way. Anyway I'm not happy with ascribing to it the oooph of Theory. Was mainly trying to explain why imo nuclear WMDs don't have the deterrent value (either to the individual holder or in aggregate across all holders) that many feel they do.
  • TresTres Posts: 2,819
    kle4 said:

    Being too open to Russian money and not a fan of 'woke' matters does not equal regarding or in effect treating Putin as a spiritual leader. That's too direct a connection.
    It works for the GOP.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    kle4 said:

    Thus far he does not seem a fool. He and his country are prepared to fight, which is essential to get the other side talking, but if a way can be had to acceptably limit damage it seems he would try. It would be interesting how well he can bring his country with him if that path does prove viable.
    I suspect that a lot of the Western assistance is at least being partly conditional of him entertaining vaguely reasonable terms for ending this (even if things go so well that he is in a strong position to push for more). Whilst supporting him and Ukraine strongly there can be no doubt that ultimately we want this to finish asap.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    MattW said:

    It seems a very good reason for preserving some oil/gas fields, or opening up a new one or two.

    'Excuses' available include helping Germany out of the hole it has currently dug for itself.

    It is very notable though seldom mentioned that Energy Supplies have been left out of the EU sanctions package, like silk scarves from Milan. I make it that Nordstream 1 is worth about a billion a week to Russia.
    When the war is costing £20b a day that won’t go far
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 5,173
    alex_ said:

    Perhaps the endgame here is Russia in NATO. To protect against… China

    If we get through all this in one piece then I don't think anyone else in Europe, save for Putin's puppets, is going to want to have anything to do with Russia for at least the next decade, let alone trying to build a constructive relationship with them. Who would make the stupid mistake of trusting them? The best we can hope for is that they kill Putin and replace him with a more stable bastard, who can learn to concentrate on beating his own people up rather than picking fights with the rest of us.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Liz has surpassed herself in flagmanship. A true pass the sick bag moment

    There’s so much I find nauseating about this photograph, the expression, the camera angle, the misplaced confidence, the audacity to pretend the U.K is offering full support when there is no legal route for #Ukraine refugees, and we’re paying for it.

    It’s sickening.
    @trussliz

    https://mobile.twitter.com/skiologist/status/1497833211249848322
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 5,173
    #Breaking EU decides to shut down Russian media outlets, Sputnik and RT

    https://twitter.com/michaelh992/status/1497976940849946638
  • I wonder if YouTube, Twitter, etc will ban them?
    I believe they already have.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 9,768

    Going back to having a laugh would be nice.....
    His comedy career is done after this
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,367
    Scott_xP said:

    Second, we will ban the Kremlin’s media machine in the EU.
     
    The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, and their subsidiaries,
    will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war.
     
    We are developing tools to ban their toxic and harmful disinformation in Europe. https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1497973706831929348/photo/1

    Russia Today already has a lot of tools.

    Like Salmond.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,247
    alex_ said:

    When the war is costing £20b a day that won’t go far
    I don't know where that sum comes from. War is expensive, but not that expensive, at least in direct terms. Possibly the knock on effect for the economy would be.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited February 2022
    Foxy said:

    I don't know where that sum comes from. War is expensive, but not that expensive, at least in direct terms. Possibly the knock on effect for the economy would be.
    Yea. That figure is whiffy.

    A lot of uninformed bullshit flying about right now.
  • I believe they already have.
    I thought so too, but I've just tuned into live RT on youtube.
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    Posted without comment:

    Zelensky is a globalist puppet for Soros and the Clintons.

    https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1497924876480483333 [AZ State Senator]
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 5,603
    Taz said:

    Agreed, but the green lobby won’t allow it. High gas prices are desirable to ensure moving away from gas. They don’t care about the effect on people. Renewables are the desired end game but we don’t want to impoverish people getting there.
    Then the green lobby need to be sidelined.
  • Do only older people say "tuned into" these days?
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    ping said:

    Yea. That figure is whiffy.
    Dunno - what is the cost of the military kit he has allegedly lost so far? Although that is a sunk cost.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,938
    edited February 2022
    Chameleon said:

    Posted without comment:

    Zelensky is a globalist puppet for Soros and the Clintons.

    https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1497924876480483333 [AZ State Senator]

    Ah - the Soros trope again. He's jewish, so he must be.

    Poor old Viktor and his mates in Trumpland.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Scott_xP said:

    Second, we will ban the Kremlin’s media machine in the EU.
     
    The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, and their subsidiaries,
    will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war.
     
    We are developing tools to ban their toxic and harmful disinformation in Europe. https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1497973706831929348/photo/1

    As @NickPalmer pointed out earlier rt.com is surprisingly informative and not entirely biased. I had not for instance seen this rather important story elsewhere

    Belarus’ Lukashenko warns of WWIII

    https://www.rt.com/russia/550766-belarus-war-russia-sanctions/
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    https://twitter.com/olex_scherba/status/1497975994015227907

    A spirited exchange between a Russian ship & a Georgian maintenance ship.

    - You Russian?
    - Yes.
    - We refuse you refueling.
    - Who speaks?
    - Assistant captain from Georgia. “Russian ship, go fuck yourself”

    - But we run on fumes.
    - Ok, then row, fucking invaders!
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,118
    huge breaking news at BP:

    - BP to exit its 20% stake in Russian oil giant Rosneft

    - BP chief executive Bernard Looney to resign from board of Rosneft with immediate effect

    - https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1497980539483172872
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 9,768
    IanB2 said:

    The growing crisis requires a mature, level headed adult to lead our country, whereas the Tories have lumbered us with a spoiled, entitled child.

    What would you have done differently and why?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,247

    His comedy career is done after this
    If he survives this outside prison, he will never need to pay for a drink again.

    He is showing the world what leadership and patriotism really look like.

    Astute to be open for peace talks too. Give the Russian army an excuse to climb down.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022
    alex_ said:

    Dunno - what is the cost of the military kit he has allegedly lost so far? Although that is a sunk cost.
    What’s the cost of the ruble dropping 10% against the US$ in the past week?

    What’s the cost of it dropping 10% more tomorrow, as the ATMs in Moscow run out of cash and credit cards stop working?
  • I was already following Rob Lee, but not Michael Kofman..

    Marcel Dirsus
    @marceldirsus
    I’ve said this before but I’ll say it again: You should follow @RALee85 and @KofmanMichael to understand what’s happening in Ukraine.
    https://twitter.com/marceldirsus/status/1497980909991211017
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518
    Sandpit said:

    What’s the cost of the ruble dropping 10% against the US$ in the past week?

    What’s the cost of it dropping 10% more tomorrow, as the ATMs in Moscow run out of cash and credit cards stop working?
    Well that too!
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,823
    Scott_xP said:

    huge breaking news at BP:

    - BP to exit its 20% stake in Russian oil giant Rosneft

    - BP chief executive Bernard Looney to resign from board of Rosneft with immediate effect

    - https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1497980539483172872

    Wow. That's absolutely huge. Good on BP shareholders for forcing the issue.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,625

    Then the green lobby need to be sidelined.
    I agree but it is unlikely. They are very well funded and influential.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,676
    RobD said:

    Perhaps you should stick to commenting on Washington politics?
    Don't be be like that! We all comment on other countries' politics all the time. Not as important as the Bristol South Town Council by-election, true, but still vaguely interesting, and SSI's US perspective is as interesting as anyone's.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    alex_ said:

    I suspect that a lot of the Western assistance is at least being partly conditional of him entertaining vaguely reasonable terms for ending this (even if things go so well that he is in a strong position to push for more). Whilst supporting him and Ukraine strongly there can be no doubt that ultimately we want this to finish asap.
    Here's the problem. What would a decent settlement look like. Anything more that Putin began with could be treated by the Kremlin as a win. Anyway we've played our big financial card so let's see how it pans out.
  • Sandpit said:

    What’s the cost of the ruble dropping 10% against the US$ in the past week?

    What’s the cost of it dropping 10% more tomorrow, as the ATMs in Moscow run out of cash and credit cards stop working?
    Only 10%?

    That seems optimistic.
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,507
    Scott_xP said:

    Second, we will ban the Kremlin’s media machine in the EU.
     
    The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, and their subsidiaries,
    will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war.
     
    We are developing tools to ban their toxic and harmful disinformation in Europe. https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1497973706831929348/photo/1

    Exposing liars and disinformation is the right way to confront a dictatorship, not suspending free speech.

    I think this is yet another mistake by the EU. I hope we don't make it.
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,277
    A watershed moment for the EU in arming Ukraine and together with the other sanctions announced this evening I’m not sure how much more they can do.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,938
    edited February 2022

    Here's the problem. What would a decent settlement look like. Anything more that Putin began with could be treated by the Kremlin as a win. Anyway we've played our big financial card so let's see how it pans out.
    Not if there were new kinds of guarantees about reduced direct Russian involvement alongside being out of NATO, to be policed by large external actors.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 9,768
    Scott_xP said:

    I understand that Liz Truss's surprising comments on Brits going to fight in Ukraine this morning took No 10 by surprise...
    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/foreign-secretary-liz-truss-back-26341016

    They were Ill-advised.

    To be fair to her she realised halfway through she’d screwed up and started to back peddle
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,357
    .

    Don't be be like that! We all comment on other countries' politics all the time. Not as important as the Bristol South Town Council by-election, true, but still vaguely interesting, and SSI's US perspective is as interesting as anyone's.
    The perspective isn’t interesting when it is totally wrong.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,551

    Should also mention because it isn't being mentioned enough elsewhere that the Russian central bank have appealed for calm after so many people tried to get their money out of ATMs.

    The full banking crisis starts tomorrow though, when people can't their money out of branches....
  • My best case of NATO's response in the case of Putin using nuclear weapons is that it would be launch targeted Trident strikes on all Russian military and nuclear launch facilities to cripple its capability to fight, and would try and destroy Putin personally.

    It wouldn't look to irradiate and destroy its major cities, although there would undoubtedly be major collateral damage.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 14,073

    You seem to think I am supporting Putin in his wilder ravings. I am not.

    I am trying to point out a resolution of a situation that now seems even more incredibly dangerous than it was a few days ago.
    I think Putin has twigged he is not merely fighting Ukraine. As that penny drops, it is a tad more dangerous.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022

    Only 10%?

    That seems optimistic.
    I think they spent the first $200bn of their war chest to prop up the Rouble on Thursday.
  • Only 10%?

    That seems optimistic.
    Fancy a bet, Bart? I say more than 10%.

    How much you want - shall we say 1,000 roubles?
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 14,073
    edited February 2022
    RobD said:

    .

    The perspective isn’t interesting when it is totally wrong.
    RobD said:

    .

    The perspective isn’t interesting when it is totally wrong.
    Greens have got Bristol South Town in the bag. Betting tip.

    Edit. Oops. I’ve managed to do one of them double yoke posts myself. Dare I start deleting bits of it?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,386
    MattW said:

    It seems a very good reason for preserving some oil/gas fields, or opening up a new one or two.

    'Excuses' available include helping Germany out of the hole it has currently dug for itself.

    It is very notable though seldom mentioned that Energy Supplies have been left out of the EU sanctions package, like silk scarves from Milan. I make it that Nordstream 1 is worth about a billion a week to Russia.

    If it is to go in, someone needs to build Germany a Plan B.
    So...

    The world energy markets are wonderfully and curiously interconnected. (And this is one of those times I wish I was still a money manager!)

    So, right now (despite pretty low demand), European natural prices are spiking as everyone rushes to make sure that storage facilities are filled to the brim. This has in turn meant that US natural gas prices are rising as it now makes more sense to send incremental gas to LNG liquification plants in the US for export.

    This means that in the US, coal is beginning to look like better value for electricity production. Powder River Basin coal has gone from about $12/ton to more than $30, as gas is diverted abroad.

    Putin's invasion is therefore saving the US coal industry as another unintended consequence.

    The bottleneck right now is LNG shipping capacity. The US (and Australia) could happily burn more coal for electrical generation, and therefore export more gas. Without Bloomberg, I don't know what LNG day rates are right now, but I'd be very surprised if they were less than $200,000 (against only $25-30,000 last summer).

    Golar LNG. You heard it here first.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    What would you have done differently and why?
    Not made Truss Foreign Sec
    Not made the Afghan evacuation the farce it was
    Not responded to Elwood in that disgraceful manner in the header
    Not ennobled a parcel of tory-sponsoring oligarchs
    Not been a spoiled, entitled child

    the fact that he hasn't actually publicly shat himself in the less-than-a-week since the actual invasion is not the complete vindication you seem to suggest. Russia does its homework: their takedown of truss after her farcical Moscow visit proved that they study her and us in depth. Knowing what sort of a man johnson is will have emboldened Putin.
  • Go Sweden!

    Carl Bildt
    @carlbildt
    In the one country after the other what was unthinkable yesterday becomes necessary today. 🇸🇪 now announces sending also 5.000 AT4 antitank weapons to 🇺🇦. That’s substantial. It’s an effective weapon highly regarded by also the US Army.

    https://twitter.com/carlbildt/status/1497983633365286914
  • Ukrainians have launched a website to help Russian families find their relatives killed in combat, @JamesAALongman reports from Moscow.

    “That’s just one way the truth of the situation is slowly leaking into Russia despite state media control.” https://abcn.ws/3soXace


    https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/1497956985094000644?s=20
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,938
    edited February 2022

    The full banking crisis starts tomorrow though, when people can't their money out of branches....
    Yup. China will turn the screws and extract its demands, too. Settle this down or no help.
  • My best case of NATO's response in the case of Putin using nuclear weapons is that it would be launch targeted Trident strikes on all Russian military and nuclear launch facilities to cripple its capability to fight, and would try and destroy Putin personally.

    It wouldn't look to irradiate and destroy its major cities, although there would undoubtedly be major collateral damage.

    Not sure about that last point. One strategic problem Russia has always had is that it is basically two cities, Moscow and StP. Russia would have to take out a dozen Western Cities to achieve equivalence.

    Incidentally, isn't there a major problem with the idea of Russia nuking Kyiv in that it would certainly damage Belarus and parts of Russia too?
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 11,480
    A whole load of Military jobs are suddenly available in the West - I'd like to encourage the whole of the Russian armed forces to apply.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 56,022
    XE.com rouble/dollar rate is currently 83.3. It was 77 a week ago, and clearly being held up by the central bank. Two weeks ago it was 74.

    Informal rate in Moscow is 100, at the few remaining open money changers.
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    Go Sweden!

    Carl Bildt
    @carlbildt
    In the one country after the other what was unthinkable yesterday becomes necessary today. 🇸🇪 now announces sending also 5.000 AT4 antitank weapons to 🇺🇦. That’s substantial. It’s an effective weapon highly regarded by also the US Army.

    https://twitter.com/carlbildt/status/1497983633365286914

    At this rate Ukraine is going to be the most well equipped army in Europe. (Admittedly this is Sweden but) I do wonder a bit about whether there becomes a point whereby the distinction about NATO involvement or not is determined by boots on the ground is purely academic. And how that changes things (it probably explains Putin’s action today)
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,367

    My best case of NATO's response in the case of Putin using nuclear weapons is that it would be launch targeted Trident strikes on all Russian military and nuclear launch facilities to cripple its capability to fight, and would try and destroy Putin personally.

    It wouldn't look to irradiate and destroy its major cities, although there would undoubtedly be major collateral damage.

    It would depend on the target. If the targets are in Ukraine, I would *not* respond with nukes. I would get a worldwide moratorium on Russia and everything Russian. Make them a pariah state (more so than at the moment).

    Sadly, we may need to respond with nukes if the targets were anywhere outside Ukraine.

    What worries me is if Russia used chemical or biological weapons. They have the capability, and we don't. Our only response is nuclear.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,568
    alex_ said:

    At this rate Ukraine is going to be the most well equipped army in Europe. (Admittedly this is Sweden but) I do wonder a bit about whether there becomes a point whereby the distinction about NATO involvement or not is determined by boots on the ground is purely academic. And how that changes things (it probably explains Putin’s action today)
    If the distinction is less than Ukraine might more easily concede not to seek to join NATO, but presumably would make it less a concession to Russian eyes. And the wish to join the EU would remain.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,650
    edited February 2022
    alex_ said:

    When the war is costing £20b a day that won’t go far
    I spotted that number, and I don't believe it.

    Brief envelope calculation of part of the cost.

    200k of armed forces personnel at Ukraine's borders, or invading. Russia GPD per pop = 10k USD.

    Multiply up, remembering that GDP is double the amount paid to a professional Russian soldier, which is around £6k a year, and that many of these are conscripts, so the GDP figure accounts for a big chunk of the overheads, gives a number of 200k*6k=1200 million per month, or 40 million per day for soldiers' wages.

    Fine there is the kit and the missiles (200 so far?) and the planes shot down etc.

    But 20 billion £ or $ a day is BS when soldiers' wages are $0.04 billion per day.

    I think this number was from an Estonian Minister, and the rest of his report was credible.

    In Roubles 20 billion is still $250 million or so or 0.25 billion $, which is a more credible.
  • Hot news from the front line.

    There are Russians all over Hampstead with their noses pressed up against the windows of the local Estate Agents. Foxtons have put a 10% premium on all property with an NW3 postcode.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,386
    MattW said:

    I make it that Nordstream 1 is worth about a billion a week to Russia.

    I think you are a little high with that estimate.

    Russian natural gas exports (total) are 6.5% of $400bn - or $25bn/year*. And their gas is exported through three major pipelines, half a dozen minor ones, and two LNG plants (Sakhalin-2 and Yamal).

    Nordstream 1 is a big pipe, sending about 40BCM of gas a year, but it is smaller than the pipeline that runs through Ukraine (a 65BCM pipe).

    Total exports of natural gas to non-former USSR countries are about 185BCM a year, so Nordstream 1 is probably more like $1bn every six weeks.

    * That's the 2019 number. As gas contracts are mostly oil price linked, the number is probably a bit higher today, but almost certainly not more than $40bn.
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,507
    MattW said:

    It's worth a note that this is Putin Playbook.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/16/europe/russia-putin-crimea-nuclear/index.html

    Shortly after that he threatened Denmark with nukes.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-threatens-denmark-with-nuclear-weapons-if-it-tries-to-join-nato-defence-shield-10125529.html
  • alex_alex_ Posts: 7,518

    It would depend on the target. If the targets are in Ukraine, I would *not* respond with nukes. I would get a worldwide moratorium on Russia and everything Russian. Make them a pariah state (more so than at the moment).

    Sadly, we may need to respond with nukes if the targets were anywhere outside Ukraine.

    What worries me is if Russia used chemical or biological weapons. They have the capability, and we don't. Our only response is nuclear.
    How much damage can chemical/biological weapons cause though? Obviously loads of deaths, but not the end of civilisation.
  • Swedish PM:

    Sweden to send Ukraine cash, helmets and anti-tank weapons.

    Will Putin consider this to be military assistance? If so, this may be the last you’ll ever hear from this particular troublesome Jock.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,118
    the statement from BP says the company will write down up to $25bn at the end of the first quarter as a result of the Rosneft exit
    https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1497985987506544642
  • MaxPB said:

    Wow. That's absolutely huge. Good on BP shareholders for forcing the issue.
    Who are they going to sell it to?
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 10,154
    Is there any chance that the Ukraine Air Force are operating from Romanian/Polish air fields?

    Or being refueled by US tankers?
  • Not sure about that last point. One strategic problem Russia has always had is that it is basically two cities, Moscow and StP. Russia would have to take out a dozen Western Cities to achieve equivalence.

    Incidentally, isn't there a major problem with the idea of Russia nuking Kyiv in that it would certainly damage Belarus and parts of Russia too?
    I just don't think NATO would needlessly target civilians whatever happened.

    Of course, it needs to claim it might because that might be the only deterrent that could stop Russia from doing the same to ours.
  • Swedish PM:

    Sweden will not be joining NATO.

    Not sure it’s her decision to make. She’ll probably be out of office in September.
  • YokesYokes Posts: 1,359
    If you were Zelenskyy right now, would you go to the Belarus border for a meeting right now? Highly risky

    As mentioned yesterday, President Big Hat is due to commit forces over the next 48-72 hours and that has been confirmed by the Ukrainians this afternoon, who said they had reports of Belarus forces prepping. This might be an important addition because it potentially enables the opening of a new front, if the Belarus military can fight.

  • algarkirk said:

    O man of peace; Could you just remind us what was the Russian concern which will be solved for them by an ultra violent invasion of a UN recognised non NATO sovereign country bigger than France?

    Invasion was sadly a last resort...Putin felt he wasn't listened to and got angry and lashed out
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 45,367
    alex_ said:

    How much damage can chemical/biological weapons cause though? Obviously loads of deaths, but not the end of civilisation.
    TimT's an expert on this sort of thing, but some biological weapons (proposed only, hopefully, or if developed long got rid of) were extremely nasty.

    And we don't have a response. AIUI, until either Clinton or Obama, the official US response was to use nukes.
This discussion has been closed.