politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » GE 2015 – the view of the spread betting trader
Comments
-
Just to be clear this is SURBY's forecast not the official YouGov (which I think basically flips Con & Lab numbers above)?surbiton said:FINAL FORECAST
based on the Yougov 10000.
England, Scotland and Wales separately calculated by UNS.
LAB 283
CON 271
SNP 52
LD 17
UKIP 3*
PC 3
GRN 1
RES 1*
SPK 1
NI 18
Total 650
* Only 4 seats were not calculated by UNS. Three have been manually adjusted for UKIP. Clacton, Thanet S from Con and Thurrock from Labour. One for Respect from Labour.
No other statistical adjustments have been done.
and, a very Good Morning to all !
Off to Istanbul for dinner, so play nicely while I'm away. Will be back tomorrow morning to pick up the pieces0 -
Did you answer enigmatically and say 'I am"' that's what I'd have done!NickPalmer said:Opinium just polled me on a post-voting survey - who did you vote for and why, and what's a legitimate government.
0 -
That's a rather good idea. I'm expecting Twitter to be unreadable tonight - I follow about 200 political types and they'll be on overdrive - the kitten pix will have to take a back seatFreggles said:
We could always use a twitter hashtagPlato said:Is there any news on a back-up PB in case Vanilla falls over under the F5s? We had another one that worked really well last time.
#PBliveson0 -
Can anyone with Times access summarise their front page story
"Queen to Take Control of Election Aftermath"?
I though she was staying as far away from the mess as possible, until the politicians had decided to behave like adults and tell her the outcome?0 -
Depends what you mean by "making the country a better place" among other things.Patrick said:
Success in politics covers two dimensions:Casino_Royale said:
It's the politics he's not very good at. The 2010 election campaign, the 2015 campaign, the management of his own party, his own MPs, the positioning within the EU, selling his mission statement to the general public and triangulating his policy positions to try and demonstrate modernisation, and curry the most votes.Alanbrooke said:
hmmmJosiasJessop said:
There is a good chance that history will judge Cameron much better than Brown or Blair, at the very least. Holding together a coalition during the economic crisis was not easy. Blair had it easy with a large majority and will be stained by the wars, whilst Brown will be stained by the economic crash and Labour's tribal infighting, much of which he caused.Roger said:Richard Nabavi
Who knows? To be honest I've not given it much thought, since if, God forbid, we do end up with Ed Miliband in No 10, there will be much more important things to worry about than David Cameron.
In any case his place in history as one of the very best post-war PMs is already assured."
Have you ever thought about doing 'stand-up'?
Major's reputation seems to have been rehabilitated since he left power. Blair and Brown's have both plummeted. Time will tell which way Cameron's will go: Richard might well be correct.
I think Cameron will be judged by his own benchmark that he'd make a pretty good PM, whereas he's been pretty average.
Cameron always strikes me as someone who has underachieved his potential.
That's why he'll lose. In pure administrative terms, the competence of this government has been quite good - and much better than Labour - particularly on jobs, tax, economy, infrastructure, science, pensions, welfare and education reform.
1. The retail side. Getting elected, managing people, aligning factions, driving belief - basically the whole art of shaping opinion and putting yourself in a position to be able to deliver on your beliefs (assuming you have any in the first place); and
2. The managerial side. Delivering well and competently when in power. This means making the country a better place. It does not necessarily mean being able to force through a ruinous agenda.
Blair (and the Labour party generally) excel at 1. But suck harder than the vacuum of deep space at 2.
Dave (and the Tory party generally) are really very good at 2. But suck way more than is acceptable at 1.
Thus Blair and Dave are examples of potentially great but in fact deeply flawed politicians. The true political greats have strength in both dimensions.
0 -
She's learned from 2010 when we were suggesting it might be required to #activatethequeenSandpit said:Can anyone with Times access summarise their front page story
"Queen to Take Control of Election Aftermath"?
I though she was staying as far away from the mess as possible, until the politicians had decided to behave like adults and tell her the outcome?0 -
Well, as the army of voters march to the voting booths, the pollsters tell us a quarter of them are making their mind up - right now....
Tory 41%, Labour 26% anybody?0 -
Nominations for the 2010 political volte face or volte farce awards can start.
2010 Newport East.
http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20100513080200/http://www.dawnparry.com/
2015 Bristol West.
http://dawnparry.com/
0 -
I presume MORI, The Good Lord and ICM are late because they are trying to work out how the results can be that bad for the blues0
-
To paraphrase - QE2 would deliver Queen's Speech, even if it could be overturned the following week if the Tories failed to get enough backing from smaller parties.
It's a change to how they normally do this stuff apparently.Sandpit said:Can anyone with Times access summarise their front page story
"Queen to Take Control of Election Aftermath"?
I though she was staying as far away from the mess as possible, until the politicians had decided to behave like adults and tell her the outcome?0 -
Quite the opposite. She will NOT deliver a QS unless it's passage is secure via coalition, s and c or agreement to abstainPlato said:To paraphrase - QE2 would deliver Queen's Speech, even if it could be overturned the following week if the Tories failed to get enough backing from smaller parties.
It's a change to how they normally do this stuff apparently.Sandpit said:Can anyone with Times access summarise their front page story
"Queen to Take Control of Election Aftermath"?
I though she was staying as far away from the mess as possible, until the politicians had decided to behave like adults and tell her the outcome?0 -
Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.0
-
You in Soweto?!Jonathan said:Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.
0 -
But, but... How difficult is it to imagine 2010 in reverse? Then it was Labour incumbents who held on - this time it could be Tory incumbents who hold on. In 2010 the forecast was that 30% would give Labour less than 230 seats - they got 258. This time 34/35% might give the Tories 300 seats.DavidL said:I have been saying since January at least that the markets are out of line with the polling and severely over estimating the Tory chances. If Sporting Index are carrying a substantial book based on their mid points I expect them to once again make a lot of money.
The final set of polls last night seemed to me to make the Conservatives being the largest party almost impossible and one simply has to apply the regional swings from Yougov to see how seats are going to fall.
...
I expect Cameron to have resigned by this time tomorrow.
Take a look at these 17 seats. They're the difference between Labour getting 262 seats (losing) and getting 279 seats (winning). How confident are you that they will all fall? Brighton Kemptown, Pudsey, Northampton N, Halesowen, Bury N, Wirral W, Chester, Croydon C, Keighley, Cannock, Harrow E, Ealing C, Rossendale, Peterborough, Milton Keynes S, S Ribble, Finchley.0 -
So the polls released today will actually have been done after the bank holiday?0
-
Off out later knocking up.I think the Tories have got it down here in Pembs, but still working hard to get the Labour vote out.
Over last 48 hours felt people actually made up their minds.Better late than never I guess.
Good luck to fellow canvassers.0 -
Sussex. A retired gent was very angry, ranting at the staff for no discernible reason whatsoever. Going to be a looooong day for the staff.dyedwoolie said:
You in Soweto?!Jonathan said:Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.
0 -
The Times can reveal that Buckingham Palace has had a change of heart in recent days and decided that Her Majesty will deliver the Queen’s Speech — which sets the agenda for her government — whatever the outcome of the election.dyedwoolie said:Quite the opposite. She will NOT deliver a QS unless it's passage is secure via coalition, s and c or agreement to abstain
The palace had voiced fears that her reputation would be tarnished should Mr Cameron try to put forward a Queen’s Speech before he could guarantee the backing of enough MPs to govern. It had suggested that the Queen might stay away from the event, planned for May 27 in the House of Lords, in case the speech was voted down in the Commons.
Royal sources confirmed that she would lead proceedings, even if there was a risk that the speech would be overthrown the following week because the Tories had failed to muster enough backing from smaller parties.0 -
I am now leaving this place to go to a place of electioning to cast my ballot. I shall pick up some tabs and return to report on turnout in Broadland at this unholy hour.0
-
Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....0
-
Here endeth the lecture from Russia.FalseFlag said:
Blair mkII, we all know whose orders he follows and it isn't the British interest. Don't like his obvious failings being highlighted, the destruction in the Middle East and North Africa are consequences my generation will have to live with for decades.JosiasJessop said:
Yes, he did not follow Putin's every whim.FalseFlag said:
I can't imagine his foreign policy as being regarded as anything but a complete disaster. Let's hope he resigns sooner rather than later but I doubt he has the integrity.JosiasJessop said:
There is a good chance that history will judge Cameron much better than Brown or Blair, at the very least. Holding together a coalition during the economic crisis was not easy. Blair had it easy with a large majority and will be stained by the wars, whilst Brown will be stained by the economic crash and Labour's tribal infighting, much of which he caused.Roger said:Richard Nabavi
Who knows? To be honest I've not given it much thought, since if, God forbid, we do end up with Ed Miliband in No 10, there will be much more important things to worry about than David Cameron.
In any case his place in history as one of the very best post-war PMs is already assured."
Have you ever thought about doing 'stand-up'?
Major's reputation seems to have been rehabilitated since he left power. Blair and Brown's have both plummeted. Time will tell which way Cameron's will go: Richard might well be correct.
I can see why you might be upset about that.0 -
Has she gone mad?! Russian roulette with the constitutional make up of the nation.Scott_P said:
The Times can reveal that Buckingham Palace has had a change of heart in recent days and decided that Her Majesty will deliver the Queen’s Speech — which sets the agenda for her government — whatever the outcome of the election.dyedwoolie said:Quite the opposite. She will NOT deliver a QS unless it's passage is secure via coalition, s and c or agreement to abstain
The palace had voiced fears that her reputation would be tarnished should Mr Cameron try to put forward a Queen’s Speech before he could guarantee the backing of enough MPs to govern. It had suggested that the Queen might stay away from the event, planned for May 27 in the House of Lords, in case the speech was voted down in the Commons.
Royal sources confirmed that she would lead proceedings, even if there was a risk that the speech would be overthrown the following week because the Tories had failed to muster enough backing from smaller parties.
0 -
The swings are too large. The tories needed to be at least 5% ahead in the polls to keep the swing down to something they could cope with. But the polls are basically showing support level. I still expect the tories to get the most votes but it is going to be far too close.Dadge said:
But, but... How difficult is it to imagine 2010 in reverse? Then it was Labour incumbents who held on - this time it could be Tory incumbents who hold on. In 2010 the forecast was that 30% would give Labour less than 230 seats - they got 258. This time 34/35% might give the Tories 300 seats.DavidL said:I have been saying since January at least that the markets are out of line with the polling and severely over estimating the Tory chances. If Sporting Index are carrying a substantial book based on their mid points I expect them to once again make a lot of money.
The final set of polls last night seemed to me to make the Conservatives being the largest party almost impossible and one simply has to apply the regional swings from Yougov to see how seats are going to fall.
...
I expect Cameron to have resigned by this time tomorrow.
Take a look at these 17 seats. They're the difference between Labour getting 262 seats (losing) and getting 279 seats (winning). How confident are you that they will all fall? Brighton Kemptown, Pudsey, Northampton N, Halesowen, Bury N, Wirral W, Chester, Croydon C, Keighley, Cannock, Harrow E, Ealing C, Rossendale, Peterborough, Milton Keynes S, S Ribble, Finchley.0 -
Whitehall officials feared that the decision to stay away would in itself be a political act, since the Queen would effectively be prejudging the outcome of the vote by MPs. It would also break with precedent. In January 1924, George?V gave a King’s Speech shortly before the government was defeated.dyedwoolie said:Has she gone mad?! Russian roulette with the constitutional make up of the nation.
0 -
It seemed to be struggling a bit last night....Plato said:Is there any news on a back-up PB in case Vanilla falls over under the F5s? We had another one that worked really well last time.
0 -
Doubt that in TorbayMarqueeMark said:Well, as the army of voters march to the voting booths, the pollsters tell us a quarter of them are making their mind up - right now....
Tory 41%, Labour 26% anybody?0 -
Morning PB.
Beautiful sunny morning here in London. The kind to make even the most apathetic mythical Labour dependent tear themselves away their 55" taxpayer funded 3D OLED TV and bother voting.
[I wish I believed it]0 -
I don't see the problem, if they don't like it parliament can do what they've done before amend the subsequent motion to say, "Lovely delivery, Your Majesty, and we totally appreciate you dropping by, but we respectfully submit that we think your government is a pile of pants".dyedwoolie said:
Has she gone mad?! Russian roulette with the constitutional make up of the nation.Scott_P said:
The Times can reveal that Buckingham Palace has had a change of heart in recent days and decided that Her Majesty will deliver the Queen’s Speech — which sets the agenda for her government — whatever the outcome of the election.dyedwoolie said:Quite the opposite. She will NOT deliver a QS unless it's passage is secure via coalition, s and c or agreement to abstain
The palace had voiced fears that her reputation would be tarnished should Mr Cameron try to put forward a Queen’s Speech before he could guarantee the backing of enough MPs to govern. It had suggested that the Queen might stay away from the event, planned for May 27 in the House of Lords, in case the speech was voted down in the Commons.
Royal sources confirmed that she would lead proceedings, even if there was a risk that the speech would be overthrown the following week because the Tories had failed to muster enough backing from smaller parties.0 -
Morning, wet and windy here. Was first in to my polling station who were still getting ready! Also had the Opinium poll on how and why voted.0
-
Good luck Nick!!0
-
I dare say this is correct in theory, but in 2015 there's no way Cameron and Miliband will do this to HMQ.Scott_P said:
Whitehall officials feared that the decision to stay away would in itself be a political act, since the Queen would effectively be prejudging the outcome of the vote by MPs. It would also break with precedent. In January 1924, George?V gave a King’s Speech shortly before the government was defeated.dyedwoolie said:Has she gone mad?! Russian roulette with the constitutional make up of the nation.
0 -
For Dave, a day in Cornwall will always be an easier sell than tramping the pavements of suburbia just off The M1DavidL said:I have been saying since January at least that the markets are out of line with the polling and severely over estimating the Tory chances. If Sporting Index are carrying a substantial book based on their mid points I expect them to once again make a lot of money.
The final set of polls last night seemed to me to make the Conservatives being the largest party almost impossible and one simply has to apply the regional swings from Yougov to see how seats are going to fall.
I have frankly not understood Tory party strategy at all. They have spent their time chasing a couple of dozen Lib Dem seats and not done nearly enough to fight the 50-60 seats they are going to lose to Labour today. It seems bizarre to me, particularly when their only chance of maintaining power was to go into a second coalition with the same Lib Dem party diminished by the loss of the seats they are chasing.
Only the disaster in Scotland is going to stop Ed having an overall majority today. I think Labour most seats is inevitable despite this. It frankly depresses me that firstly in the referendum and now in the GE such a large percentage of our population put so little weight on fiscal sanity, sound government, sound money and a recognition that the State has to be paid for. But that's the way it is and today the Tories are going to suffer the consequences. In Scotland of course the people in their wisdom have determined that Labour is not lunatic enough and have found something even more unrealistic.
I expect Cameron to have resigned by this time tomorrow.0 -
Why is Crosby stating Ipsos +5 for Tories, Ashcroft +2, old polls?0
-
I believe that I was the first person to note publicly that the upcoming election could cause difficulties for the Queen:
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2015/03/10/antifrank-guest-slot-how-the-monarchy-might-suffer-in-the-post-election-scramble/
I'm quite proud of that.0 -
tradition breaker...
where's hugh ferbie-withastall on his bike?0 -
No idea...roserees64 said:Why is Crosby stating Ipsos +5 for Tories, Ashcroft +2, old polls?
Is Crosby a PB Tory?
Anyway, lovely morning here is SW London and I can feel the winds of change blowing through...0 -
So are our polls being skewed by an over representation of up with the lark PBers?Financier said:Morning, wet and windy here. Was first in to my polling station who were still getting ready! Also had the Opinium poll on how and why voted.
As my voting pattern is inevitably go at about 2000 and have a pint afterwards it's no wonder I never get exit polled0 -
Has the Mail told readers where Mrs Miliband bought her lovely pink twin set from?
https://twitter.com/itvnews/status/5962042389397831680 -
@patrickwintour: Found on Crisp Street just metres or in my case yards from a polling station in East London. http://t.co/caLxUvdPNW0
-
Wow, that's something of a change to what was expected. So basically, if Cons are largest party and there's no obvious coalition of the Left, expect Dave to dare everyone to vote down the Queen's Speech!Plato said:To paraphrase - QE2 would deliver Queen's Speech, even if it could be overturned the following week if the Tories failed to get enough backing from smaller parties.
It's a change to how they normally do this stuff apparently.Sandpit said:Can anyone with Times access summarise their front page story
"Queen to Take Control of Election Aftermath"?
I though she was staying as far away from the mess as possible, until the politicians had decided to behave like adults and tell her the outcome?
Exciting times ahead0 -
You know where they livePulpstar said:
Doubt that in TorbayMarqueeMark said:Well, as the army of voters march to the voting booths, the pollsters tell us a quarter of them are making their mind up - right now....
Tory 41%, Labour 26% anybody?0 -
There were no tellers present or even a police presence. Rush will come about 10am after milking and wives having tidied up their farmer husbands.Monksfield said:
So are our polls being skewed by an over representation of up with the lark PBers?Financier said:Morning, wet and windy here. Was first in to my polling station who were still getting ready! Also had the Opinium poll on how and why voted.
As my voting pattern is inevitably go at about 2000 and have a pint afterwards it's no wonder I never get exit polled0 -
Is that Ed's first visit to Doncaster since 2010?dr_spyn said:Has the Mail told readers where Mrs Miliband bought her lovely pink twin set from?
https://twitter.com/itvnews/status/5962042389397831680 -
I'd settle for that tho!Pulpstar said:
Doubt that in TorbayMarqueeMark said:Well, as the army of voters march to the voting booths, the pollsters tell us a quarter of them are making their mind up - right now....
Tory 41%, Labour 26% anybody?0 -
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
0 -
A crisp sunny morning in leafy north Hertfordshire.
I'm promised some calls later in the day and anything tasty, non actionable or barely interesting I will endeavour to pass along.
Good luck to all PB candidates and party workers today on what will I'm sure prove to a long and eventful 24 hours.0 -
We had two polling stations down here with no one telling until yesterday. I took the more marginal of them. The weather is nice - mostly sunshine and odd showers so hoping not to get too wet or bored.Financier said:
There were no tellers present or even a police presence. Rush will come about 10am after milking and wives having tidied up their farmer husbands.Monksfield said:
So are our polls being skewed by an over representation of up with the lark PBers?Financier said:Morning, wet and windy here. Was first in to my polling station who were still getting ready! Also had the Opinium poll on how and why voted.
As my voting pattern is inevitably go at about 2000 and have a pint afterwards it's no wonder I never get exit polled0 -
Good morning all.
Best wishes to Nick Palmer and all others involved in today's events. I hope the day brings you whatever you desire and, if it doesn't, that you are not too downhearted.
I have no more idea than anyone else what the outcome will be but as a wild guess will go for
Labour: 300,
UKIP: 2,
Lib Dems: 25,
Northern Ireland: 18,
Others:3,
Speaker: 1,
SNP: 40 and
Cons: 259
When Labour won in 1997 within 48 hours they announced - much to everyone's surprise - the independence of the Bank of England.
Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
And on that note, off to vote and work.0 -
I am defining the Jockalypse as SNP >=50 seats
If you believe the jockalypse cannot happen then Labour most seats is screaming value. Monstrous.0 -
My ARSE has been I'm trouble since yesterday lunchtime. Hoping its now behaving itself so I can pound the streets of Stockton South as plannedMarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
0 -
0
-
The police would have to be busy, taking the shotguns off every Kipper with a licence.....Cyclefree said:Good morning all.
Best wishes to Nick Palmer and all others involved in today's events. I hope the day brings you whatever you desire and, if it doesn't, that you are not too downhearted.
I have no more idea than anyone else what the outcome will be but as a wild guess will go for
Labour: 300,
UKIP: 2,
Lib Dems: 25,
Northern Ireland: 18,
Others:3,
Speaker: 1,
SNP: 40 and
Cons: 259
When Labour won in 1997 within 48 hours they announced - much to everyone's surprise - the independence of the Bank of England.
Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
And on that note, off to vote and work.0 -
That would be a brave move - in the Sir Humphrey sense!Cyclefree said:If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.0 -
Vote cast in Broadland. Turnout steady, fun playing guess the allegiance with cute girl and crusty old duffers. Green to win, or at least chalk one up :-)
Local election disappointing - pick 2 from 2 Tory, 2 lib and one kipper. great choice, thanks0 -
-
Absolutely not.MarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
My ARSE is looking especially resplendent this fine morning but also looking forward to a well earned sabbatical in warmer climes where the following phrase need not require any internal rationalization :
Ed Miliband Will Never Be Prime Minister
0 -
No chance.Cyclefree said:Good morning all.
Best wishes to Nick Palmer and all others involved in today's events. I hope the day brings you whatever you desire and, if it doesn't, that you are not too downhearted.
I have no more idea than anyone else what the outcome will be but as a wild guess will go for
Labour: 300,
UKIP: 2,
Lib Dems: 25,
Northern Ireland: 18,
Others:3,
Speaker: 1,
SNP: 40 and
Cons: 259
When Labour won in 1997 within 48 hours they announced - much to everyone's surprise - the independence of the Bank of England.
Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
And on that note, off to vote and work.
More likely they will toughen up the OBR to give them more credibility for their financial planning0 -
Done, voted for Damian Hinds here in Hampshire... nice weather early this morning but a bit cloudy now.0
-
Are you feeling better - you mentioned being very under the weather last night?
How is Stockton South looking? I've no idea about the seat bar your posts.RochdalePioneers said:
My ARSE has been I'm trouble since yesterday lunchtime. Hoping its now behaving itself so I can pound the streets of Stockton South as plannedMarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
0 -
Did these people work for Romney by any chance? Or Salmond?Plato said:0 -
The economic crisis was over, it was about managing the recovery.JosiasJessop said:
There is a good chance that history will judge Cameron much better than Brown or Blair, at the very least. Holding together a coalition during the economic crisis was not easy. Blair had it easy with a large majority and will be stained by the wars, whilst Brown will be stained by the economic crash and Labour's tribal infighting, much of which he caused.Roger said:Richard Nabavi
Who knows? To be honest I've not given it much thought, since if, God forbid, we do end up with Ed Miliband in No 10, there will be much more important things to worry about than David Cameron.
In any case his place in history as one of the very best post-war PMs is already assured."
Have you ever thought about doing 'stand-up'?
Major's reputation seems to have been rehabilitated since he left power. Blair and Brown's have both plummeted. Time will tell which way Cameron's will go: Richard might well be correct.0 -
Good morning, fellow voters.
Cheers for the article, Mr. Nutbrown. Although I do expect the SNP to top 50 seats, I don't think the index price is that much out of whack. Only a total clean sweep or sub-40 would be a surprise result at this stage.
Miss Cyclefree, you poker of hornet nests'!0 -
This will go down in history as the Antifrank election. Beware of sounding too smug :-)antifrank said:I believe that I was the first person to note publicly that the upcoming election could cause difficulties for the Queen:
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2015/03/10/antifrank-guest-slot-how-the-monarchy-might-suffer-in-the-post-election-scramble/
I'm quite proud of that.
0 -
Bright sunshine here, though more "Baltic" than tropical.
My best wishes to all the foot soldiers out there.0 -
He wouldn't dare do that, he would be eaten alive by all sides, including most of those who voted for him!Cyclefree said:
When Labour won in 1997 within 48 hours they announced - much to everyone's surprise - the independence of the Bank of England.
Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
He would also have to repeal the law that the current government passed, that such matters should be referred directly to the electorate.0 -
My polling station was busy at 7.25am this morning too, I had to queue and wait to get my ballot.Jonathan said:Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.
High turnout?0 -
0
-
What happens to the votes for the Kipper chappy who has been suspended by UKIP? Do they still count with him as an Indy instead or are they void?Casino_Royale said:
My polling station was busy at 7.25am this morning too, I had to queue and wait to get my ballot.Jonathan said:Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.
High turnout?0 -
The SNP today looks like Labour in 1997. We Tories KNEW it was going to be bad. We just had a vain hope that it wouldn't be as horrendous as it turned out.Alistair said:I am defining the Jockalypse as SNP >=50 seats
If you believe the jockalypse cannot happen then Labour most seats is screaming value. Monstrous.
SLAB is as trashed today as the Tories were in 97. SNP to poll 50%+ and take at least 55 seats...0 -
This seems a reasonable forecast if you assume some shy Tories. I'll go with this.
https://twitter.com/fpp2015/status/5962078977946419210 -
I think it was an extreme example but during the referendum the percentage that had voted did not change at all in Dundee between 12 and 8 and barely after that. I think people might be getting into the habit of voting early or using a postal vote.Casino_Royale said:
My polling station was busy at 7.25am this morning too, I had to queue and wait to get my ballot.Jonathan said:Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.
High turnout?0 -
That would be a bit rude on Ed's first Queen's Speech.edmundintokyo said:
I don't see the problem, if they don't like it parliament can do what they've done before amend the subsequent motion to say, "Lovely delivery, Your Majesty, and we totally appreciate you dropping by, but we respectfully submit that we think your government is a pile of pants".dyedwoolie said:
Has she gone mad?! Russian roulette with the constitutional make up of the nation.Scott_P said:
The Times can reveal that Buckingham Palace has had a change of heart in recent days and decided that Her Majesty will deliver the Queen’s Speech — which sets the agenda for her government — whatever the outcome of the election.dyedwoolie said:Quite the opposite. She will NOT deliver a QS unless it's passage is secure via coalition, s and c or agreement to abstain
The palace had voiced fears that her reputation would be tarnished should Mr Cameron try to put forward a Queen’s Speech before he could guarantee the backing of enough MPs to govern. It had suggested that the Queen might stay away from the event, planned for May 27 in the House of Lords, in case the speech was voted down in the Commons.
Royal sources confirmed that she would lead proceedings, even if there was a risk that the speech would be overthrown the following week because the Tories had failed to muster enough backing from smaller parties.0 -
I dont think there is any requirement to publish before 7.00. But after that Broadcasters cannot report the results. MORI have usually reported mid morning on election day for first edition of Evening Standard.dyedwoolie said:I presume MORI, The Good Lord and ICM are late because they are trying to work out how the results can be that bad for the blues
0 -
Could be the first and last....Casino_Royale said:
That would be a bit rude on Ed's first Queen's Speech.edmundintokyo said:
I don't see the problem, if they don't like it parliament can do what they've done before amend the subsequent motion to say, "Lovely delivery, Your Majesty, and we totally appreciate you dropping by, but we respectfully submit that we think your government is a pile of pants".dyedwoolie said:
Has she gone mad?! Russian roulette with the constitutional make up of the nation.Scott_P said:
The Times can reveal that Buckingham Palace has had a change of heart in recent days and decided that Her Majesty will deliver the Queen’s Speech — which sets the agenda for her government — whatever the outcome of the election.dyedwoolie said:Quite the opposite. She will NOT deliver a QS unless it's passage is secure via coalition, s and c or agreement to abstain
The palace had voiced fears that her reputation would be tarnished should Mr Cameron try to put forward a Queen’s Speech before he could guarantee the backing of enough MPs to govern. It had suggested that the Queen might stay away from the event, planned for May 27 in the House of Lords, in case the speech was voted down in the Commons.
Royal sources confirmed that she would lead proceedings, even if there was a risk that the speech would be overthrown the following week because the Tories had failed to muster enough backing from smaller parties.0 -
Cyclefree
"If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??"
So you're going for the '45 minutes to save the pound' vote?0 -
Why is it reasonable to use the same colour for both Labour and UKIP?Freggles said:This seems a reasonable forecast if you assume some shy Tories. I'll go with this.
https://twitter.com/fpp2015/status/596207897794641921
0 -
First time for everything. No Labour candidates , not even paper ones in my ward for the local elections.. as of 8am 7 people had voted!0
-
I'll be bored then...DavidL said:
I think it was an extreme example but during the referendum the percentage that had voted did not change at all in Dundee between 12 and 8 and barely after that. I think people might be getting into the habit of voting early or using a postal vote.Casino_Royale said:
My polling station was busy at 7.25am this morning too, I had to queue and wait to get my ballot.Jonathan said:Voted in the first batch. Queues and a small fracas. All before 7:10am.
High turnout?0 -
I am clinging to it ....JackW said:
Absolutely not.MarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
My ARSE is looking especially resplendent this fine morning but also looking forward to a well earned sabbatical in warmer climes where the following phrase need not require any internal rationalization :
Ed Miliband Will Never Be Prime Minister0 -
Nobody can say a bookie doesn't know how to make money, but the media comment has certainly assumed probability distributions that are ridiculously leptokurtic. Bettors have followed suit by staking so that bookies and betting exchanges are offering odds that imply the probability of a hung parliament is around 93%, which is far too high given the unknowns and their probable weight.
0 -
It just struck me what was odd about going to vote today.
The lamp posts were devoid of boards, and there seemed to be no posters in the windows.
0 -
Jack's ARSE has given refuge to many.....Scrapheap_as_was said:
I am clinging to it ....JackW said:
Absolutely not.MarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
My ARSE is looking especially resplendent this fine morning but also looking forward to a well earned sabbatical in warmer climes where the following phrase need not require any internal rationalization :
Ed Miliband Will Never Be Prime Minister0 -
UKIP looks more pink.. which is amusing given their track recordInnocent_Abroad said:
Why is it reasonable to use the same colour for both Labour and UKIP?Freggles said:This seems a reasonable forecast if you assume some shy Tories. I'll go with this.
https://twitter.com/fpp2015/status/596207897794641921
0 -
Mr. N, you think there's a realistic prospect (greater than 7%) of one party achieving a minority?
I agree it's possible, but I do think it's unlikely.0 -
Golly, where are you?SquareRoot said:
First time for everything. No Labour candidates , not even paper ones in my ward for the local elections.. as of 8am 7 people had voted!
0 -
Horsham
0 -
JackW
I must have missed your final ARSE. What was it?-1 -
No - you will see that I have predicted that Labour will win handsomely, one of the few on here to do so. You will also know that I have indicated that I won't be voting Tory.Roger said:Cyclefree
"If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??"
So you're going for the '45 minutes to save the pound' vote?
I was just speculating on what might be Labour's first major decision. The last Labour government introduced a bold measure, Ed Milliband has done something similar e.g. the energy policy announcement and I was wondering last night whether they might be doing so again and, if so, what that might be.
Whatever the economic consequences it might have some good political outcomes for him - or so he might think.
0 -
Well that's @Jonathan's backyard!SquareRoot said:
Horsham
0 -
Too many perhaps ....MarqueeMark said:
Jack's ARSE has given refuge to many.....Scrapheap_as_was said:
I am clinging to it ....JackW said:
Absolutely not.MarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
My ARSE is looking especially resplendent this fine morning but also looking forward to a well earned sabbatical in warmer climes where the following phrase need not require any internal rationalization :
Ed Miliband Will Never Be Prime Minister
I may have to introduce an Australian points system for entry to my ARSE (copyright N Farage Esq)
0 -
Higher likelihood of entry for those with special and rare skills or experience?JackW said:
Too many perhaps ....MarqueeMark said:
Jack's ARSE has given refuge to many.....Scrapheap_as_was said:
I am clinging to it ....JackW said:
Absolutely not.MarqueeMark said:
Any ominous rumblings to cause concern that your ARSE may be in trouble, JackW?JackW said:Good morning ARSE lovers worldwide ....
My ARSE is looking especially resplendent this fine morning but also looking forward to a well earned sabbatical in warmer climes where the following phrase need not require any internal rationalization :
Ed Miliband Will Never Be Prime Minister
I may have to introduce an Australian points system for entry to my ARSE (copyright N Farage Esq)0 -
One of the loaded spring guns left by the Coalition is the European Union Act 2011. Section 6(5)(e) provides that a decision to make the euro the currency of the United Kingdom must be approved by an Act of Parliament and a referendum. It should be noted however that the requirement for a referendum could be negated by a subsequent Act of Parliament. Furthermore, some academics have argued that this provision is inconsistent with EU law and is unenforceable in any event.Cyclefree said:Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
And on that note, off to vote and work.0 -
What is it I wonder thats so shameful about this election...Smarmeron said:It just struck me what was odd about going to vote today.
The lamp posts were devoid of boards, and there seemed to be no posters in the windows.0 -
Well, since he's against having a Euro referendum I don't suppose that last bit would worry him t hat much.Sandpit said:
He wouldn't dare do that, he would be eaten alive by all sides, including most of those who voted for him!Cyclefree said:
When Labour won in 1997 within 48 hours they announced - much to everyone's surprise - the independence of the Bank of England.
Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
He would also have to repeal the law that the current government passed, that such matters should be referred directly to the electorate.
He's likely - if he has the votes - to be more radical where he can then some may assume. He has said that he wants to reshape society rather than simply tinker with it. Joining the euro would do that, would put his main opponents off guard and would, in his view, solve the European question definitively.
0 -
Any overturning of that legislation and entry into the Euro when not a manifesto pledge would be catastrophic electorally. To do it as Grexit looms would compound the issue. Labour sub 100 seats in 2020 if he did that.Life_ina_market_town said:
One of the loaded spring guns left by the Coalition is the European Union Act 2011. Section 6(5)(e) provides that a decision to make the euro the currency of the United Kingdom must be approved by an Act of Parliament and a referendum. It should be noted however that the requirement for a referendum could be negated by a subsequent Act of Parliament. Furthermore, some academics have argued that this provision is inconsistent with EU law and is unenforceable in any event.Cyclefree said:Might Labour do something similar?
If so - very very wild off the wall guess here - might they announce that the UK will join the Euro??
It would keep the Lib Dems and SNP on side, would drive the Tories completely batshit crazy and would make Milliband the darling of the Eurocrats.
And on that note, off to vote and work.
0 -
Blimey - bad al is a machine gun of bile on twitter this morning. he is a lovely fella.-1