politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Two polls so far – Populus remains level pegging while CON
Comments
-
-
I've totally filled my boots in Sittingbourne Sheppey, Christchurch, Kettering and some others.rural_voter said:
Thanet, Clacton and Thurrock I assume. Plus R&S or Boston?Pulpstar said:
UKIP's problem is that it isn't doing nearly badly enough in it's no hoper seats. The vast array of 2nd places in the North should give a solid base for GE2020 though.isam said:The groupthink mike speaks of assumes Ukip will get 2-3 seats from a double figure vote share too
I expect 3 or 4 seats for UKIP this time round.
A reduced UKIP vote leaves some 'interesting' odds on what are now fairly safe Tory seats.0 -
Isn't that simply because Labour have realised they won't get a clear neat win, and are actually starting to contemplate the horror of regaining power and trying to govern whilst being behind on seats?antifrank said:The main thing that makes me wonder about the polls is Labour's brittle emotional state at present. It's hard to credit unless they have fairly tangible evidence that the polls aren't telling the whole story.
0 -
The Duke of Dork?JosiasJessop said:
This has probably already been done, but:Plato said:twitter.com/jasonmillsitv/status/595636847440723970/photo/1
Dwayne Dibley!!!0 -
A possibility, to be sure. Personally I find it hard to accept that the national polls would be as poor (or rather not good enough) for the Tories and yet they will still win on that basis of that alone though. And the other potential factors to help the Tories are even less visible.Millsy said:
The important point is the the Tories will lose votes where it doesn't matter. So what if the Tories suffer a loss of 5-10% to Ukip in their safe seats, they are not going to be moved from the blue column
This seems more likely a reason to my mind.Casino_Royale said:
Isn't that simply because Labour have realised they won't get a clear neat win, and are actually starting to contemplate the horror of regaining power and trying to govern whilst being behind on seats?antifrank said:The main thing that makes me wonder about the polls is Labour's brittle emotional state at present. It's hard to credit unless they have fairly tangible evidence that the polls aren't telling the whole story.
0 -
That Staggers article also reports doubts within Labour that their worrying is actually justified, and that apparently they always think they are going to lose at every election. Even the Staggers' conclusion isn't sure whether the worrying is justified or not. I'm rather puzzled by it; tbh I can't see the evidence for Labour's worrying. The Tories appear to be confident because they think (a. they'll at least get the popular vote (b. Tory party hierarchy feel they are assured of another coalition with the LDs to keep them in government (c. that Labour will be so afraid of being associated with the SNP, they won't vote down anything will could weaken the government. All of which are quite debatable, but the last two especially.0
-
Boston is interesting because it is under UKIP control somewhat, it is the strongest local UKIP stronghold and the Tory MP retired, also the UKIP candidate despite his young age is a local councillor.Pulpstar said:
You'd have to go with R&S for the fourth I think due to incumbency factor. The youngish Boston candidate may well cost UKIP the seat unfortunately.rural_voter said:
Thanet, Clacton and Thurrock I assume. Plus R&S or Boston?Pulpstar said:
UKIP's problem is that it isn't doing nearly badly enough in it's no hoper seats. The vast array of 2nd places in the North should give a solid base for GE2020 though.isam said:The groupthink mike speaks of assumes Ukip will get 2-3 seats from a double figure vote share too
I expect 3 or 4 seats for UKIP this time round.
A reduced UKIP vote leaves some 'interesting' odds on what are now fairly safe Tory seats.
I say it's 50-50 but only because a LordA poll had it very close, the Survation one had it on a huge double digit lead for UKIP.0 -
I was thinking about how the Ashcroft polling may have understated Farage's chances but there was also the ComRes polling which had him 1% behind.Speedy said:
Yesterday's Sheffield Hallam poll which named the candidates and provided a boost for Captain Titanic there, that's what happened.MP_SE said:Anyone know what is going on with the South Thanet odds? Tory and Labour odds are lengthening. The UKIP odds look way way too short.
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/thanet-south/winning-party
OGH has a theory that naming the candidates will provide a boost for Clegg, Murphy and Farage in the polls, ICM has aided him on that.0 -
I do seem to remember at 2010, the Tories actually by their historically low standard put on a fair few votes in some places like RedCar and then woefully under performed in some traditional Tory seats / marginals they were expected to walk e.g Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones failed in deepest darkest farmer country of Chippenham.Millsy said:I find it hard to see how the polling swings in England and Wales can be just ignored. In England & Wales in 2010 the Tories were 10.2% ahead of LAB on voters. It is very hard to discount current margins of just one or two.
The assumption appears to be that LAB will put on votes where it doesn’t matter but will do less well where it does. I don’t buy it and there’s precious little supporting evidence.
The important point is the the Tories will lose votes where it doesn't matter. So what if the Tories suffer a loss of 5-10% to Ukip in their safe seats, they are not going to be moved from the blue column
Off the top of my head there was a lot of excitement from the Tories and early claims exit polls might be wrong and not hung parliament, due to showing so well in some early traditionally Labour seats that they had no chance of ever winnings, but then had lots of misses on marginals.0 -
Might be true, but probably bollocks. Wouldn't be the first time this sort of story has turned up out of nowhere. Good news, only two days 'til we start to find out.SouthamObserver said:Labour has never seen itself as the natural party of government in this country. It is perennially pessimistic about its chances, something which also affects the way it governs. What happened in I992 probably stung the party more than any other election it has ever contested.
I suspect there is a bit of that in the NS article, but I also believe that Labour is going to significantly under-perform the UNS numbers. A lot of sitting Labour MPs will increase their majorities, the Labour vote share will go up, but gains against both the LDs and Tories will be relatively light and certainly nowhere near enough for Labour to be the largest party.0 -
Well UNS has never been more that 10 seats wrong on the Labour-Tory fight, 1997 was the only exception because of the huge LD tactical vote in the south.SouthamObserver said:Labour has never seen itself as the natural party of government in this country. It is perennially pessimistic about its chances, something which also affects the way it governs. What happened in I992 probably stung the party more than any other election it has ever contested.
I suspect there is a bit of that in the NS article, but I also believe that Labour is going to significantly under-perform the UNS numbers. A lot of sitting Labour MPs will increase their majorities, the Labour vote share will go up, but gains against both the LDs and Tories will be relatively light and certainly nowhere near enough for Labour to be the largest party.0 -
Speedy The key is where the UKIP vote is coming from not where it has drifted back, and half of UKIP voters are ex Tories, so plenty of room for some of them to come back at the last minute to get an EU referendum and stop a Miliband-Sturgeon deal, just as voters moved to Likud in Israel from rightwing parties at the last minute. Indeed UKIP are still on 12% in Norwich N, 19% in Peterborough, 15% in Stourbridge and 14% in N Cornwall in the last batch of Ashcroft marginals polls, so plenty of room to be squeezed
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2015/05/mixed-fortunes-in-my-final-round-of-marginals/#more-11523
Before 1997 John Major of course won over 40% in 1992, the last Tory leader to do so
0 -
UKIP have been running a very strong ground game in Dudley North and have been able to pull in a lot of support from UKIP teams in Birmingham so I believe that seat is one of the possible (admittedly few) upsets that could see UKIP get an extra seat.Pulpstar said:
You'd have to go with R&S for the fourth I think due to incumbency factor. The youngish Boston candidate may well cost UKIP the seat unfortunately.rural_voter said:
Thanet, Clacton and Thurrock I assume. Plus R&S or Boston?Pulpstar said:
UKIP's problem is that it isn't doing nearly badly enough in it's no hoper seats. The vast array of 2nd places in the North should give a solid base for GE2020 though.isam said:The groupthink mike speaks of assumes Ukip will get 2-3 seats from a double figure vote share too
I expect 3 or 4 seats for UKIP this time round.
A reduced UKIP vote leaves some 'interesting' odds on what are now fairly safe Tory seats.0 -
-
O/T:
Trojan Horse scandal still ongoing according to headteacher:
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/03/birmingham-headteachers-say-subject-campaign-intimidation
"Birmingham headteachers say they are subject to campaign of intimidation
Schools in city caught in upheaval from the Trojan Horse investigation are targeted with dead animals in playgrounds and death threats on social media"0 -
That is one more than I have seen anywhere!currystar said:
In Eastleigh I have only seen one UKIP posterMikeK said:
MikeK's forecast for the GE......:
Con 29% Lab 28% UKIP 21% L/Dem 7% SNP 5% Grn 3% Others 7%
Travelled around Hampstead and Camden Town this morning and the absence of posters and billboards is striking. I saw one window in Camden displaying a vote Labour poster; just one in miles of streets in this Labour London heartland. Uncanny! It's as if people have decided to vote - if at all - in silence.
Thats why I believe a silent revolution, utterly British, is in the making.0 -
You see the key is always where the vote is drifting back, if it is.HYUFD said:Speedy The key is where the UKIP vote is coming from not where it has drifted back, and half of UKIP voters are ex Tories, so plenty of room for some of them to come back at the last minute to get an EU referendum and stop a Miliband-Sturgeon deal, just as voters moved to Likud in Israel from rightwing parties at the last minute. Indeed UKIP are still on 12% in Norwich N, 19% in Peterborough, 15% in Stourbridge and 14% in N Cornwall in the last batch of Ashcroft marginals polls, so plenty of room to be squeezed
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2015/05/mixed-fortunes-in-my-final-round-of-marginals/#more-11523
Before 1997 John Major of course won over 40% in 1992, the last Tory leader to do so
You forget that UKIP voters are made up of people who detest Cameroonianism.
And I will repeat it, no one believes Cameron's promises.0 -
UKIP's 10 most likely seats IMO:
1. Clacton
2. Thanet South
3. Thurrock
4. Rochester & Strood
5. Boston & Skegness
6. Castle Point
7. Dudley North
8. Rother Valley
9. Walsall North
10.Great Grimsby0 -
I think the nervous breakdown over Scotland would cover it.antifrank said:The main thing that makes me wonder about the polls is Labour's brittle emotional state at present. It's hard to credit unless they have fairly tangible evidence that the polls aren't telling the whole story.
0 -
I think the candidate in Grimsby effectively kills any chance of that being a UKIP gain.AndyJS said:UKIP's 10 most likely seats IMO:
1. Clacton
2. Thanet South
3. Thurrock
4. Rochester & Strood
5. Boston & Skegness
6. Castle Point
7. Dudley North
8. Rother Valley
9. Walsall North
10.Great Grimsby0 -
1992, 1970, 1959 (believe it or not - you may not when you check the result!)...Labour actually has quite a history of hubris and then humiliation when it comes to election results. Indeed, they have been more or less arrogant about their chances of winning for the last 15 months (cf @Jonathan).SouthamObserver said:Labour has never seen itself as the natural party of government in this country. It is perennially pessimistic about its chances, something which also affects the way it governs. What happened in I992 probably stung the party more than any other election it has ever contested.
I suspect there is a bit of that in the NS article, but I also believe that Labour is going to significantly under-perform the UNS numbers. A lot of sitting Labour MPs will increase their majorities, the Labour vote share will go up, but gains against both the LDs and Tories will be relatively light and certainly nowhere near enough for Labour to be the largest party.
I am not saying that such a shock is in store this time - merely that if Labour is pessimistic, there probably is a reason for it. It may be postal votes, or canvass returns, or simply the fact that while they have expended enormous energy on their campaign, it has been ill-directed and badly thought out. But whatever it is, it's clearly there.0 -
Lord Oakeshott has been in Dewsbury today supporting the Labour candidate. She is one of the 30 from her party who received money in order to oust the sitting Conservative.0
-
I agree, with the following chances:AndyJS said:UKIP's 10 most likely seats IMO:
1. Clacton
2. Thanet South
3. Thurrock
4. Rochester & Strood
5. Boston & Skegness
6. Castle Point
7. Dudley North
8. Rother Valley
9. Walsall North
10.Great Grimsby
Clacton 100%
Thanet South 60%
Thurrock 80%
Rochester 40%
Boston 50%
Castle Point 40%
The problem is on other seats that haven't been polled and might have slipped under the radar, anyway that is the reason why the range of UKIP seats goes from 3 up to 5.0 -
Does increasing your number of seats by 10 or 20 count as "winning"?Tissue_Price said:Are Labour losing?
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/05/are-labour-losing0 -
It ok Khalid Mahmood will be on the case again, he's your man to clamp down on things like gender segregation...it isn't like he is happy to attend rallys were it occurs, on wait...AndyJS said:O/T:
Trojan Horse scandal still ongoing according to headteacher:
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/03/birmingham-headteachers-say-subject-campaign-intimidation
"Birmingham headteachers say they are subject to campaign of intimidation
Schools in city caught in upheaval from the Trojan Horse investigation are targeted with dead animals in playgrounds and death threats on social media"
0 -
It is very easy if you have an interest in politics to get caught up in all the excitement (over excitement) of the next few days. The reality is that folk on here are very much in the minority and (despite OGH's strap line) part of a bubble of unreality. Most folk made their minds up weeks / months ago. All the 24hr news blah, newspaper headlines, leaflets through the door etc make very little difference. In a very few marginal seats, Russell Brand, Boris Johnson, punch ups on the streets of Glasgow or whatever might, just might, move a few voters to actually change the result. There is evidence from 2010 that where Labour's impressive ground operation is focused, it makes a real difference (eg Westminster North, Edgbaston, Gedling) but can it really make that much difference, especially if many voters are disaffected?
Logic and past experience, that the final result usually matches the polls before the short campaign starts, suggests OGHs views are right and the betting markets wrong (he has made a good deal of money from spotting when the market is wrong). Personal experience from the past few weeks leaves me firmly convinced Labour will do well in London, including picking up a seat not on most lists for Labour to win. However there is clearly nervousness about the prospects elsewhere, some of that is dictated by the groupthink OGH mentions but perhaps also generated because there are areas where Labour is simply not doing as well as it could be eg Medway Towns.
I think OGH is right but have a small nagging doubt he might not be, perhaps because of the experience from having "been there got the t shirt" in 92, when I was involved in a fantastically successful campaign (we won) but the rest of the country was a different story.
0 -
Survation. @Survation 4m4 minutes ago
POLL ALERT: 7PM - 2 days to go until polls open 30 mins until our next @DailyMirror poll @Jack_Blanchard_ reports "at the top of the hour".
Another Survation0 -
I agree with Mike's logic and think that Labour having an equal number of seats is even money. Nobody is recognising that they have a huge army of supporters in key marginals that should enable them to deliver at least in line with the national polls0
-
I think Great Grimsby will go Labour and kippers in third, but the Con highjinks in Dudley North could send it kipper.Speedy said:
I agree.AndyJS said:UKIP's 10 most likely seats IMO:
1. Clacton
2. Thanet South
3. Thurrock
4. Rochester & Strood
5. Boston & Skegness
6. Castle Point
7. Dudley North
8. Rother Valley
9. Walsall North
10.Great Grimsby
Clacton 100%
Thanet South 60%
Thurrock 80%
Rochester 40%
Boston 50%
Castle Point 40%
The problem is on other seats that haven't been polled and might have slipped under the radar, anyway that is the reason why range of UKIP seats goes from 3 up to 5.0 -
Right - about to set off for the pb.com meet-up in Broxtowe. A chance to
kidnapshare a pint with Nick.
Victoria pub, 85 Dovecote Lane, Beeston NG9 1JG from about 8 if anyone local is reading and at a loose end...0 -
"Places like Stockton South and Broxtowe have received extra staff, suggesting the party’s central data is projecting a tougher fight than expected by the polls – while alarmingly, seats like Pudsey, Ipswich and Northampton North are receiving no extra visits. Without those gains, even a combined Labour-SNP bloc won’t be sufficient to oust David Cameron.
One organiser sent me a text that summed up the overall message: “Dude, where’s my swing?”
“The only way I can explain our promise,” said another, “is if there is barely any swing at all.”"
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/05/are-labour-losing0 -
If they use them correctly. They have been shockingly badly used here. I agree with @JGC that where they are focussed and well-managed, it may make a difference - but otherwise it's hard to see them doing more than a shift a handful of ultra-marginals.jameslaz said:I agree with Mike's logic and think that Labour having an equal number of seats is even money. Nobody is recognising that they have a huge army of supporters in key marginals that should enable them to deliver at least in line with the national polls
0 -
Speedy The hardcore UKIP voters detest Cameron yes, and UKIP will get around 10% at least, but at least 40% of UKIP voters voted for Cameron in 2010, even if only half those vote for him again that would give the Tories an extra 3% or so and get them up to around 37% and save a few more Tory marginals0
-
Since the Tories don't effectively have a candidate in Dudley North after that very amusing scandal there and UKIP was already second within range of Labour, yes there is a chance if only the Tory voters have thrown the towel.foxinsoxuk said:
I think Great Grimsby will go Labour and kippers in third, but the Con highjinks in Dudley North could send it kipper.Speedy said:
I agree.AndyJS said:UKIP's 10 most likely seats IMO:
1. Clacton
2. Thanet South
3. Thurrock
4. Rochester & Strood
5. Boston & Skegness
6. Castle Point
7. Dudley North
8. Rother Valley
9. Walsall North
10.Great Grimsby
Clacton 100%
Thanet South 60%
Thurrock 80%
Rochester 40%
Boston 50%
Castle Point 40%
The problem is on other seats that haven't been polled and might have slipped under the radar, anyway that is the reason why range of UKIP seats goes from 3 up to 5.
But I'm sure Tory HQ will do it's best to prevent Tory tactical voting in favour of UKIP, even if it means Labour win the seat.0 -
Yet another online poll!!!bigjohnowls said:Survation. @Survation 4m4 minutes ago
POLL ALERT: 7PM - 2 days to go until polls open 30 mins until our next @DailyMirror poll @Jack_Blanchard_ reports "at the top of the hour".
Another Survation0 -
Because I'm unfashionably early.
I'm the pub for da Broxtowe meet.
I'm the chap in the red shoes.0 -
I saw a UKIP poster in Southampton! (And two Conservative ones. And four Labour ones - although perhaps it was more like two sets of two Labour posters..)foxinsoxuk said:
That is one more than I have seen anywhere!currystar said:
In Eastleigh I have only seen one UKIP posterMikeK said:
MikeK's forecast for the GE......:
Con 29% Lab 28% UKIP 21% L/Dem 7% SNP 5% Grn 3% Others 7%
Travelled around Hampstead and Camden Town this morning and the absence of posters and billboards is striking. I saw one window in Camden displaying a vote Labour poster; just one in miles of streets in this Labour London heartland. Uncanny! It's as if people have decided to vote - if at all - in silence.
Thats why I believe a silent revolution, utterly British, is in the making.0 -
I think they will prefer to shove him than vote for him again.HYUFD said:Speedy The hardcore UKIP voters detest Cameron yes, and UKIP will get around 10% at least, but at least 40% of UKIP voters voted for Cameron in 2010, even if only half those vote for him again that would give the Tories an extra 3% or so and get them up to around 37% and save a few more Tory marginals
0 -
Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours
0 -
The media and many on here, will be declaring that a government led by Miliband would be illegitimate,Jonathan said:
Might be true, but probably bollocks. Wouldn't be the first time this sort of story has turned up out of nowhere. Good news, only two days 'til we start to find out.SouthamObserver said:Labour has never seen itself as the natural party of government in this country. It is perennially pessimistic about its chances, something which also affects the way it governs. What happened in I992 probably stung the party more than any other election it has ever contested.
I suspect there is a bit of that in the NS article, but I also believe that Labour is going to significantly under-perform the UNS numbers. A lot of sitting Labour MPs will increase their majorities, the Labour vote share will go up, but gains against both the LDs and Tories will be relatively light and certainly nowhere near enough for Labour to be the largest party.0 -
The DH call is the worst news I've heard this week.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours0 -
If they are the same red shoes you'll be the only person in the pub soon so easy for everyone to spot.TheScreamingEagles said:Because I'm unfashionably early.
I'm the pub for da Broxtowe meet.
I'm the chap in the red shoes.
Now click your heels together and say "there's nothing like swingback, there's nothing like swingback".
0 -
They are the replica of the originals.Neil said:
If they are the same red shoes you'll be the only person in the pub soon so easy for everyone to spot.TheScreamingEagles said:Because I'm unfashionably early.
I'm the pub for da Broxtowe meet.
I'm the chap in the red shoes.
Now click your heels together and say "there's nothing like swingback, there's nothing like swingback".0 -
It is amazing that Labour most seats is on 5.1, with only one poll out of nine showing Tory most seats.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours0 -
Bet you keep a diaryTheScreamingEagles said:Because I'm unfashionably early.
I'm the pub for da Broxtowe meet.
I'm the chap in the red shoes.0 -
The mind boggles.TheScreamingEagles said:
They are the replica of the originals.Neil said:
If they are the same red shoes you'll be the only person in the pub soon so easy for everyone to spot.TheScreamingEagles said:Because I'm unfashionably early.
I'm the pub for da Broxtowe meet.
I'm the chap in the red shoes.
Now click your heels together and say "there's nothing like swingback, there's nothing like swingback".
0 -
Unless it's like the famous wobble which the Tories had during the 1987 campaign. In retrospect the result was never in doubt.antifrank said:The main thing that makes me wonder about the polls is Labour's brittle emotional state at present. It's hard to credit unless they have fairly tangible evidence that the polls aren't telling the whole story.
0 -
Until you saw Roger call it for Dave, surely.Casino_Royale said:
The DH call is the worst news I've heard this week.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours
0 -
8m to Survation0
-
Speedy When they hover over their ballot papers and the prospect of a Miliband premiership under the thumb of Salmond and no EU referendum hovers into view I would not be surprised if a few stick with the blue team in the end0
-
You know the election is too close to call because publicity shy Paddy Power haven't done an early payout.0
-
I'm sure that you all mostly know about this link for declaration times, but if you don't (and I had trouble finding it again) then
http://election.pressassociation.com/Declaration_times/general_by_time.php
@speedy,foxinsoxuk etc. Re Hull area - I think that we'll get surprises. Hull East - 3am! I wouldn't give a fig for the seat normally, but for 2-Jags old haunt to go purple would be quite a lot of fun.
0 -
Sh*t. Did he?Neil said:
Until you saw Roger call it for Dave, surely.Casino_Royale said:
The DH call is the worst news I've heard this week.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours0 -
roadto326 retweeted
Will Jennings @drjennings 2m2 minutes ago
Will Jennings retweeted Guardian news
Abolishing statutory maternity pay? Wow.0 -
I think the prospect of a Cameron premiership under the thumb of Clegg and no EU referendum is equally appalling.HYUFD said:Speedy When they hover over their ballot papers and the prospect of a Miliband premiership under the thumb of Salmond and no EU referendum hovers into view I would not be surprised if a few stick with the blue team in the end
But just to see Cameron's face when he's booted out of No.10 tips the scales to UKIP with many of their voters.0 -
How on earth did communities like that subsist? I can see abandoned terraces in the background there but it doesn't look nearly enough for the population, there doesn't seem to be much grazing.SeanT said:
Yes. I've visted a few Italian ghost towns. One in particular, in Calabria - Rhogudi - features in a novel of mine.Plato said:
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3236/5791050742_cde1cc57fc_o.jpg
I spent a day there (it's very hard to get to). An incredible place. V spooky. It was abandoned in the 19th century due to an overabundance of earthquakes, and witches.
I can understand people abandoning them as unsuitable for modernity, no roads and stuff. But how did a community even develop there without any visible agricultural prospects?0 -
Roger got the Scottish referendum correct didn`t he.Neil said:
Until you saw Roger call it for Dave, surely.Casino_Royale said:
The DH call is the worst news I've heard this week.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours
I always look out for Southam, he makes me laugh, especially on the night before the Scottish referendum , he was still giving his money away,0 -
See if you can swipe a look at his canvass returns when he's distracted. I'd love a second opinion ;-)Tissue_Price said:Right - about to set off for the pb.com meet-up in Broxtowe. A chance to
kidnapshare a pint with Nick.
Victoria pub, 85 Dovecote Lane, Beeston NG9 1JG from about 8 if anyone local is reading and at a loose end...0 -
Not surprisingly as a Tory, I want Nick to fall short, decent chap though he seems to be, but I'm a bit surprised he's down the pub 36 hours before the polls open rather than doing all he can to round up every last Labour voter.Tissue_Price said:Right - about to set off for the pb.com meet-up in Broxtowe. A chance to
kidnapshare a pint with Nick.
Victoria pub, 85 Dovecote Lane, Beeston NG9 1JG from about 8 if anyone local is reading and at a loose end...
Is he supremely confident he's got Broxtowe in the bag, or does he know it's not going to happen?
;-)0 -
Actually I forgot about Plymouth Moor View where UKIP were just 5% behind Labour in an Ashcroft poll from December:
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2015/01/plymouth-moor-view/0 -
Very helpful leak even if it terms out again to be "blue sky" thinking, thats tomorrow BBC new cycle sorted. Wonder how long the Guardian have been sitting on it, waiting to deploy at the most helpful time.bigjohnowls said:roadto326 retweeted
Will Jennings @drjennings 2m2 minutes ago
Will Jennings retweeted Guardian news
Abolishing statutory maternity pay? Wow.0 -
The leaked proposals say the DWP is at high risk of continuing to overspend on sickness and disability benefits in future years because the high-profile programme of welfare reform introduced by Duncan Smith in 2010 “has not realised its goals” of saving money.0
-
Ed Miliband thinks it is still useful to be campaigning in Warwickshire North. Snigger.
He thinks he is losing.0 -
Jack Blanchard @Jack_Blanchard_ 27s28 seconds ago
Today's Mirror/Survation poll:
LAB 34 (n/c)
CON 33 (n/c)
UKIP 16 (n/c)
LD 9 (n/c)
SNP 4 (+1)
GREEN 4 (+1)
OTHER 1 (-1)
No change.0 -
@Jack_Blanchard_: Today's Mirror/Survation poll:
LAB 34 (n/c)
CON 33 (n/c)
UKIP 16 (n/c)
LD 9 (n/c)
SNP 4 (+1)
GREEN 4 (+1)
OTHER 1 (-1)0 -
Tonights Survation EICIPM
Britain Elects @britainelects 23s24 seconds ago
Latest Survation poll:
LAB - 34% (-)
CON - 33% (+2)
UKIP - 16% (-1)
LDEM - 9% (+1)
GRN - 4% (-)0 -
Well, that poll was something of a damp squib.0
-
I'm interested to see the named constituency question of Survation.0
-
So is it Tories up 2 or not?0
-
Some of this is simply not true and much of it rather understandable nerves.AndyJS said:
Does increasing your number of seats by 10 or 20 count as "winning"?Tissue_Price said:Are Labour losing?
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/05/are-labour-losing
Perhaps an indication that some of the speculation in the past 48 hours is overdone is the fact that Yvette Cooper lead a bus full of folk around 6 constituencies today, Hove, the 2 Brighton seats, Croydon Central & Bermondsey. If there was real concern about places like Westminster North and Hampstead they would have gone there instead of longer shot marginals.
As to what counts as "winning", that is likely to be more than an abstract philosophical discussion on Friday morning0 -
0
-
Speedy Clegg has said an EU referendum is not a red line, public spending on education is, so that would not be a problem, the prospect of a Miliband premiership is more of a fear for them, especially as UKIP voters heavily favour a Cameron over Miliband premiership0
-
I really doubt SMP will be abolished. The ability of (some?) firms to claim it back from their NI bill on the other hand? That could save a small chunk of the £12bn. (After all the Coalition managed to remove small firms' ability to reclaim SSP from their NI bill with hardly a squeak from anyone.)bigjohnowls said:roadto326 retweeted
Will Jennings @drjennings 2m2 minutes ago
Will Jennings retweeted Guardian news
Abolishing statutory maternity pay? Wow.
0 -
Nope, the previous Survation poll was also 34-33.Plato said:So is it Tories up 2 or not?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2015_United_Kingdom_general_election0 -
Have we had any polls that does not show EICIPM?0
-
up 2 on Survation's daily mail pollPlato said:So is it Tories up 2 or not?
0 -
I think so compared to massive SurvationPlato said:So is it Tories up 2 or not?
0 -
Who where on labourdoostep today
Cooper: Hove, Kemptown, Pavilion, Croydon Central, Bermondsey
Balls: Cardiff Central, South Swindon
Smith: Cardiff Central, Cardiff North
Harriet: Northamton North
Tristam: Chester, Weaver Vale,
Flint: Pudsey
Benn: Bradford West
Twigg: Harrow East
Burnham: Redditch, Worcester, Dudley
Khan: Croydon Central, Battarsea
Dugher: Pudsey, Halifax
Ashworth: Loughborough, Northampton North
Coaker: Sherwood
Maria Eagle: Wirral West
St Helens North candidate: Chester
Jarvis: Bradford
Watson (with Coogan): Brentford, Stevenage, Ealing Central
Hodge: Thurrock
Berger: Finchley
Reed: Croydon Central
Gen Secretary: Swindon South
Jack McConnell: Edinburgh South,
Alastair Campbell: Burnley
McCluskey: Pudsey
Eizzard: Plymouth0 -
You better believe it.Casino_Royale said:
Sh*t. Did he?Neil said:
Until you saw Roger call it for Dave, surely.Casino_Royale said:
The DH call is the worst news I've heard this week.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours
0 -
This is getting confusing!Big_G_NorthWales said:
up 2 on Survation's daily mail pollPlato said:So is it Tories up 2 or not?
0 -
SeanT The key factor is the UKIP vote, if that drifts back to around 10% the Tories will be on about 37% and certainly largest party0
-
I wonder if they repeated the special ballot question.bigjohnowls said:
I think so compared to massive SurvationPlato said:So is it Tories up 2 or not?
0 -
No change according to Mirror0
-
Survation did a poll for the daily mail dated 1-2nd May - labour 34 conservatives 31Plato said:This is getting confusing!
Big_G_NorthWales said:
up 2 on Survation's daily mail pollPlato said:So is it Tories up 2 or not?
0 -
More gaiety. mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/robert-blay-ukip-suspends-parliamentary-5641537#ICID=sharebar_twitter
Robert Blay, who is standing in North East Hampshire, made the shocking threat of violence against Conservative Ranil Jayawardena.
Former bank accountant Blay, 55, who used to be a member of the Conservative Party, told our reporter that Jayawardena had been tipped to potentially be the country’s first British Asian Prime Minister.
And in a vile and shocking outburst, he raged: “If he is I will personally put a bullet between his eyes.
"If this lad turns up to be our Prime Minister I will personally put a bullet in him. That’s how strong I feel about it.
“I won’t have this f***** as our Prime Minister. I absolutely loathe him.”
The shocking remarks were made to a Daily Mirror investigator at a public meeting on Saturday attended by party leader Nigel Farage.
A UKIP spokesman said tonight: “"Mr Blay has been suspended with immediate effect".0 -
Last weeks MORIcompouter2 said:Have we had any polls that does not show EICIPM?
0 -
*pointless poster non-prognostications*
went running yesterday: nine miles. # electoral posters = # machine guns
on the bus to hel(l)ensburgh and back today: # snp placards > # scottish tory und unionist placards > the three lib dem diamonds on one gate such that you could only see them if you were heading in one direction > zero dirty labour placards (= # placards from the party i'll be voting for on thursday)
took the train to the big city. saw a few snp fingys in winders on the way. in the big ass-glow (my friend who christened it thus blew his brains out) city centre there was absolutely no sign of an election. didn't even see a transvestite. but it was raining.0 -
Wearing my orange tinted sun glasses and seven years of spani Sh beer and wine, possibly coupled with too much sun my take on lib dem prospects are
Scotland hold 4/5 there are reasons but no time to post them
We will lose
Burnley
Withington
Bradford East
May hold berwick but difficult
We will also lose
Cardiff Cental, BristolWest, Wells, Taunton, Somerton&Frome, the one in Norfolk, Brent Central, possibly Redcar
There will be gains, Watford, OXWAB, and possibly two others so net 52/53 gbut that is too silly so I'll settle for 40
0 -
Not somewhere Ed should have even needed to set foot in. If he did, do it early on not 36 hours before polls open. That certainly sends out a signal!DavidL said:Ed Miliband thinks it is still useful to be campaigning in Warwickshire North. Snigger.
He thinks he is losing.0 -
Are you related to @FluffyThoughts ?initforthemoney said:
*pointless poster non-prognostications*
went running yesterday: nine miles. # electoral posters = # machine guns
on the bus to hel(l)ensburgh and back today: # snp placards > # scottish tory und unionist placards > the three lib dem diamonds on one gate such that you could only see them if you were heading in one direction > zero dirty labour placards (= # placards from the party i'll be voting for on thursday)
took the train to the big city. saw a few snp fingys in winders on the way. in the big ass-glow (my friend who christened it thus blew his brains out) city centre there was absolutely no sign of an election. didn't even see a transvestite. but it was raining.0 -
Is Eddie Izzard now a member of the shadow cabinet?AndreaParma_82 said:Who where on labourdoostep today
Cooper: Hove, Kemptown, Pavilion, Croydon Central, Bermondsey
Balls: Cardiff Central, South Swindon
Smith: Cardiff Central, Cardiff North
Harriet: Northamton North
Tristam: Chester, Weaver Vale,
Flint: Pudsey
Benn: Bradford West
Twigg: Harrow East
Burnham: Redditch, Worcester, Dudley
Khan: Croydon Central, Battarsea
Dugher: Pudsey, Halifax
Ashworth: Loughborough, Northampton North
Coaker: Sherwood
Maria Eagle: Wirral West
St Helens North candidate: Chester
Jarvis: Bradford
Watson (with Coogan): Brentford, Stevenage, Ealing Central
Hodge: Thurrock
Berger: Finchley
Reed: Croydon Central
Gen Secretary: Swindon South
Jack McConnell: Edinburgh South,
Alastair Campbell: Burnley
McCluskey: Pudsey
Eizzard: Plymouth
If not, perhaps he should be. He seems to be their crack legion.0 -
The Labour focus on Scotland again seems to be lacking.AndreaParma_82 said:Who where on labourdoostep today
Cooper: Hove, Kemptown, Pavilion, Croydon Central, Bermondsey
Balls: Cardiff Central, South Swindon
Smith: Cardiff Central, Cardiff North
Harriet: Northamton North
Tristam: Chester, Weaver Vale,
Flint: Pudsey
Benn: Bradford West
Twigg: Harrow East
Burnham: Redditch, Worcester, Dudley
Khan: Croydon Central, Battarsea
Dugher: Pudsey, Halifax
Ashworth: Loughborough, Northampton North
Coaker: Sherwood
Maria Eagle: Wirral West
St Helens North candidate: Chester
Jarvis: Bradford
Watson (with Coogan): Brentford, Stevenage, Ealing Central
Hodge: Thurrock
Berger: Finchley
Reed: Croydon Central
Gen Secretary: Swindon South
Jack McConnell: Edinburgh South,
Alastair Campbell: Burnley
McCluskey: Pudsey
Eizzard: Plymouth0 -
Lord. We're screwed.Neil said:
You better believe it.Casino_Royale said:
Sh*t. Did he?Neil said:
Until you saw Roger call it for Dave, surely.Casino_Royale said:
The DH call is the worst news I've heard this week.bigjohnowls said:Most seats market
LAB into 5.1 from 5.9
Con 1.2 out to 1.23
EICIPM market Mystic Dan does the trick as back to yesterdays levels after DH declares Dave the winner
Dave drifted like a barge in last 3 hours0 -
Possibly Redcar LAB are 1/12nichomar said:Wearing my orange tinted sun glasses and seven years of spani Sh beer and wine, possibly coupled with too much sun my take on lib dem prospects are
Scotland hold 4/5 there are reasons but no time to post them
We will lose
Burnley
Withington
Bradford East
May hold berwick but difficult
We will also lose
Cardiff Cental, BristolWest, Wells, Taunton, Somerton&Frome, the one in Norfolk, Brent Central, possibly Redcar
There will be gains, Watford, OXWAB, and possibly two others so net 52/53 gbut that is too silly so I'll settle for 400 -
UKIP supporter beaten up over sign. Lefties like to go on about the fascist right wingers but I think they should have a long hard look in the mirror.
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/12932095.UKIP_supporter__kicked_by_group_of_men__over_election_sign_outside_his_house/0 -
Have all the firms had a chat and decided they'd rather get collective 'egg on their face' if they're wrong?!SeanT said:As predicted by many of us, the polls are herding. They are now almost pointless.
0 -
What is it with UKIP in Hampshire? Dysfunctional doesnt begin to cover it.Plato said:More gaiety. mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/robert-blay-ukip-suspends-parliamentary-5641537#ICID=sharebar_twitter
Robert Blay, who is standing in North East Hampshire, made the shocking threat of violence against Conservative Ranil Jayawardena.
Former bank accountant Blay, 55, who used to be a member of the Conservative Party, told our reporter that Jayawardena had been tipped to potentially be the country’s first British Asian Prime Minister.
And in a vile and shocking outburst, he raged: “If he is I will personally put a bullet between his eyes.
"If this lad turns up to be our Prime Minister I will personally put a bullet in him. That’s how strong I feel about it.
“I won’t have this f***** as our Prime Minister. I absolutely loathe him.”
The shocking remarks were made to a Daily Mirror investigator at a public meeting on Saturday attended by party leader Nigel Farage.
A UKIP spokesman said tonight: “"Mr Blay has been suspended with immediate effect".
0 -
SeanT UKIP is lower than its peak, and the drift of voters from rightwing parties to Likud in Israel only happened on election day0
-
How can Labour think they are losing? How bad can their canvassing returns really be telling them they are doing given the rock solid TCTC (equaling a Labour government) of the polls. Silly Labour.
What will be interesting to see (though sadly I will not be around to see it, being at a count), is how disbelieving the pundits and pollsters may be of the exit polls. We have reason to doubt the exit polls more than usual this time apparently, but it'll be fun to see if most people are adamant they will be wrong (If they indicate the LDs holding 40 or something else ridiculous) and then they are almost dead on again.0