Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

A New Era For PB! – politicalbetting.com

12346»

Comments

  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,734
    Starmer’s crusade goes on:

    https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1829998531333222814

    NEW: The government is set to give councils more powers to stop takeaways opening near schools in a bid to tackle child obesity
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,277

    So exactly how would we have got better growth when the rest of Europe is suffering worse growth than we are? You guys are still so desperate to pin everything on Brexit even when it is blindingly obvious that it is not the economic disaster you so desperately wanted so you could be proved right.
    I didn’t say it was an economic disaster. Growth in the UK before we joined the EEC was poor. The UK has done well out of being in that and then the EU . People can defend Brexit in other areas but economically I’m sorry they just need to admit it hasn’t been a success.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,801
    Leon said:

    Sardinian food is weird tho. They like sheep’s brains and maggot cheese

    Tbh it wouldn’t be the first place I’d move in Italy
    Yeah it is a bit random, but it doesn't get unbearably hot in the summer like Sicily which has undeniably better food, I also think school options are better in Sardinia than Sicily. There's a couple of very good international private schools that are run by Brits.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 14,834
    carnforth said:

    You wouldn't find the corruption wearing on the soul? Easier if you're not poor, of course. But freedom might not feel so free where there are high levels of corruption - or so I imagine.
    I’ve been tempted to move full time to France: better weather, pretty towns and villages, nice roundabouts, good infrastructure, and a language I can understand. But every country has its downsides. In France there’s a certain dourness and lack of dynamism that seems to have taken over, and it’s a society not entirely at ease with itself. I still find myself drawn back to London.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,879
    edited August 2024
    Foxy said:

    Yes, the government that you voted for these last decade has left the country in a piss-poor state, not least with its "fuck
    business" and "we have had
    enough of experts" Brexit
    leadership.
    One Starmer has changed
    nothing so far, indeed that is
    behind his sinking popularity, but
    the sulking loser Brexiters are
    throwing their toys out of the
    pram.

    There is nothing less patriotic
    than a Brexiteer feeling for his
    wallet. He doesn't give a damn
    about his fellow citizens.
    One of my father's friends was a
    staunch Remainer and hates
    Brexit. Yet he is already sick to death of the Starmer government's tax rises, anti entrepreneur, pro union attitude and its attacks on pensioners income
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,285
    Leon said:

    I despise you and everything you believe in and represent. And the government is giving you a massive pay rise out of MY taxes and MY creativity when all you are is a fucking provincial quack

    Sorry. Taking my taxes away. Oops. Who will pay now?!
    Are you standing by your Labour vote at the election?
  • TimSTimS Posts: 14,834
    HYUFD said:

    One of my father's friends was a
    staunch Remainer and hates
    Brexit. Yet he is already sick to death of the Starmer government's tax rises, anti entrepreneur, pro union attitude and its attacks on pensioners income
    So far the announced tax rises are about a fifth of the annual fiscal drag from frozen thresholds introduced by Rishi Sunak as chancellor. A drop in the ocean.

    As will be the new surprise tax rises at the budget. They are barking much more loudly than I expect the bite to be.

    Which is a shame, because we have a public realm that’s falling apart at the seams and a new government too timid to do anything about it.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,418
    "gouging" as in price gouging seems to be a phrase du jour since Kamala said it.

    Now being applied to champagne council house wild ones Oasis and their ticket sales.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,801
    TimS said:

    So far the announced tax rises are about a fifth of the annual fiscal drag from frozen thresholds introduced by Rishi Sunak as chancellor. A drop in the ocean.

    As will be the new surprise tax rises at the budget. They are barking much more loudly than I expect the bite to be.

    Which is a shame, because we have a public realm that’s falling apart at the seams and a new government too timid to do anything about it.
    How about cutting OpEx and increasing CapEx?
  • Jim_MillerJim_Miller Posts: 3,253
    edited August 2024
    On presidents and deficits, since you were discussing it, earlier: Article 1 of the US Constitution puts the House of Representatives in charge of taxation. So, by constitutional design, presidents are less important on deficits than is commonly believed. (I am no expert on the subject, but I believe there are some parallels in British history, that control over taxation by the House of Commons put sharp limits on the power of monarchs.)
    https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/constitution-united-states

    Especially when the House of Representatives is controlled by the opposition party.

    In 1994, Republicans won control of the House and the Senate. (Democrats had controlled the House since the 1954 election.) This graph shows what happened after the 1994 election: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSGDA188S

    Does Clinton deserve some credit for that surplus? Sure. But so do Republican leaders Newt Gingrich and Bob Dole.


  • TimSTimS Posts: 14,834
    edited August 2024
    MaxPB said:

    How about cutting OpEx and increasing CapEx?
    First thing they should do is change our ridiculous fiscal rules which seem designed to do exactly the opposite.

    Cutting opex is rather easier said than done though. Look at the wailing and gnashing of teeth when they cut the universal winter fuel allowance.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,418

    Starmer’s crusade goes on:

    https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1829998531333222814

    NEW: The government is set to give councils more powers to stop takeaways opening near schools in a bid to tackle child obesity

    Why are the focusing on this stuff in first 100 days?

    Bonkers.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,879
    TimS said:

    I’ve been tempted to move full time to France: better weather, pretty towns and villages, nice roundabouts, good infrastructure, and a language I can understand. But every country has its downsides. In France there’s a certain dourness and lack of dynamism that seems to have taken over, and it’s a society not entirely at ease with itself. I still find myself drawn back to London.
    Macron is certainly more dynamic, less prone to raise tax, more pro business and less pro union than Starmer and his government are
  • nico679nico679 Posts: 6,277
    edited August 2024
    RFK Jnr is now suing in North Carolina to get off the ballot after the elections board voted to refuse his request . In NY he’s suing to get on the ballot .

    Ironically in NC the Dems originally wanted him out of the race . But the 3 Democrats on the elections board refused his request.

    This bizarre we want him out and now in is probably because after endorsing Trump , his name on the ballot is a problem in swing states . Some GOP leaning voters might think he’s a Trump supporter so why not vote for him .

    In NC Trump has another problem in the nutjob GOP candidate for governor who could cause a reverse coat tails .
  • TimSTimS Posts: 14,834
    HYUFD said:

    One of my father's friends was a
    staunch Remainer and hates
    Brexit. Yet he is already sick to death of the Starmer government's tax rises, anti entrepreneur, pro union attitude and its attacks on pensioners income
    What he really means is he’s sick to death of having his pensioner benefits cut. He wants other peoples benefits cut, not his. You know, the young workshy scroungers.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,734

    Why are the focusing on this stuff in first 100 days?

    Bonkers.
    Doesn’t Starmer’s wife work in occupational health?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,418
    nico679 said:

    RFK Jnr is now suing in North Carolina to get off the ballot after the elections board voted to refuse his request . In NY he’s suing to get on the ballot .

    Ironically in NC the Dems originally wanted him out of the race . But the 3 Democrats on the elections board refused his request.

    This bizarre we want him out and now in is probably because after endorsing Trump , his name on the ballot is a problem in swing states . Some GOP leaning voters might think he’s a Trump supporter so why not vote for him .

    In NC Trump has another problem in the nutjob GOP candidate for governor who could cause a reverse coat tails .

    The madness just gets madder.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 14,834

    Why are the focusing on this stuff in first 100 days?

    Bonkers.
    Because it doesn’t cost much money. They can’t afford the other more important stuff.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,879
    TimS said:

    So far the announced tax rises are about a fifth of the annual fiscal drag from frozen thresholds introduced by Rishi Sunak as chancellor. A drop in the ocean.

    As will be the new surprise tax rises at the budget. They are barking much more loudly than I expect the bite to be.

    Which is a shame, because we have a public realm that’s falling apart at the seams and a new government too timid to do anything about it.
    Capital gains tax, inheritance tax, council tax will all go up in the autumn, maybe a wealth tax too.

    The income tax and national insurance thresholds will remain frozen as well
  • TimSTimS Posts: 14,834
    HYUFD said:

    Capital gains tax, inheritance tax, council tax will all go up in the autumn, maybe a wealth tax too.

    The income tax and national insurance thresholds will remain frozen as well
    You should get a job as a tax policy guru.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,418

    Doesn’t Starmer’s wife work in occupational health?
    What's that got to do with take aways?

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 65,418
    TimS said:

    Because it doesn’t cost much money. They can’t afford the other more important stuff.
    Well they can but they have imposed stupid fiscal rules on themselves that most economists think are pointless politicking with no actual basis in economics.
  • TresTres Posts: 2,811
    MaxPB said:

    Maybe not, though roughly my tax contribution to the country paid for 3.5 nurses in the NHS, or 2 doctors, or 5 care workers. My daughter gets no funding for nursery so we're not in the education system and my family has private healthcare so we don't use the NHS much at all. There are many, many thousands of families just like mine making the same kind of decisions right now, high earners are fleeing the country and you might say good riddance but then it's people like you and attitudes like yours that are driving force for successful people deciding they've had enough of being treated like punching bags.
    you are a strong sufferer of main character syndrome. if you want to emigrate, own it, don't blame someone else
  • TresTres Posts: 2,811
    Cookie said:

    See, this attitude is exactly the problem. "Rich people can bugger off." Which makes it rather harder to pay for things.
    i'm also a rich person, i'm just not an whiny asswipe about it
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,186

    Why are the focusing on this stuff in first 100 days?

    Bonkers.
    Absolutely no political antennae.

    If the Tories can get behind Cleverly or Jenrick, they should be winning by elections by 2026!
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 5,661
    TimS said:

    Because it doesn’t cost much money. They can’t afford the other more important stuff.
    I'm not rich, but the government are welcome to close or means test the Lifetime ISA and stop giving me £1000 a year for nothing. There's a freebie for Starmer.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,183
    ...
    HYUFD said:

    One of my father's friends was a
    staunch Remainer and hates
    Brexit. Yet he is already sick to death of the Starmer government's tax rises, anti entrepreneur, pro union attitude and its attacks on pensioners income
    Have they raised any taxes yet?
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,831
    Test
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,285
    edited August 2024
    Nigelb said:

    Everyone seems to be getting awfully excited about polls, four and a half years before the next election.

    Very odd.

    It would be except for the fact that polls are one of the main things we usually discuss on this particular site regardless of anything else. 😊
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,080
    I thought Iowa was boring, until we reached Nebraska.
  • nico679 said:

    RFK Jnr is now suing in North Carolina to get off the ballot after the elections board voted to refuse his request . In NY he’s suing to get on the ballot .

    Ironically in NC the Dems originally wanted him out of the race . But the 3 Democrats on the elections board refused his request.

    This bizarre we want him out and now in is probably because after endorsing Trump , his name on the ballot is a problem in swing states . Some GOP leaning voters might think he’s a Trump supporter so why not vote for him .

    In NC Trump has another problem in the nutjob GOP candidate for governor who could cause a reverse coat tails .

    If Harris loses PA but then wins the election because the GOP ratfuck blows up in their faces in NC then that would just be too perfect.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,156

    Starmer’s crusade goes on:

    https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1829998531333222814

    NEW: The government is set to give councils more powers to stop takeaways opening near schools in a bid to tackle child obesity

    At this rate he will be appointing someone to check under the bed before they switch the big light off, and somebody to check if people have flushed after a big poo.
  • viewcode said:

    At this rate he will be appointing someone to check under the bed before they switch the big light off, and somebody to check if people have flushed after a big poo.
    His new deal with Europe will be a contract to import German shelf toilets.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,453

    ...

    Have they raised any taxes yet?
    You're telling us the won't? That's great to hear...
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,540

    Riddle me this: bar staff will be expected to police the new no smoking in pub gardens but retail staff - as was discussed at length earlier - are told not to get involved and stop any shop lifting or intervene in any way.

    Do pub customers routinely threaten violence to pub staff, and to attack them with dirty needles?

    Publicans have a legal duty around ensuring the Health & Safety of their customers, and I would just see it as part of that.

  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,540
    TimS said:

    I’ve been tempted to move full time to France: better weather, pretty towns and villages, nice roundabouts, good infrastructure, and a language I can understand. But every country has its downsides. In France there’s a certain dourness and lack of dynamism that seems to have taken over, and it’s a society not entirely at ease with itself. I still find myself drawn back to London.
    How would your tax situation compare?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,285
    "Stop testing children on times tables, unions tell ministers
    Teachers demand grammar exams are also stripped back to ‘curb student anxiety’"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/08/31/stop-testing-children-on-times-tables-unions-tell-ministers/
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,183
    edited September 2024

    You're telling us the won't? That's great to hear...
    Far be it for me to speak on behalf of Reeves, but even your low tax, low energy Conservative Government had they won the election would be looking at tax rises and service cuts. Fortunately for them, they lost.

    I had written you a lengthy reply but Vanilla who have a history of keeping even deleted comments disposed of my points when I allowed my phone to close as I was pondering my next comment.

    Everyone should be welcome to legitimately criticise missteps by this Government. I am happy to call out the WFA fiasco, something hopefully Reeves will have resolved by the budget. However commentary on Casino's dystopian imagination, William Glenn's retweets of Farage or GB News extrapolations, much like his pro-Trump, Anti-Harris (incidentally autocorrected too antichrist!) fare are best left unread. I won't bother going into the return of the prodigal son's multiple unhinged posts from Kotor last night, suffice to say I do wonder whether PB is for me anymore, and it does seem a number of moderate posters have already voted with their feet.

    Anyway, I will assure you that you'd have loved my lengthy monologue. It's a shame Vanilla decided you were not to read it.

    P S. The new improved Vanilla seems to have an improved autocorrect, so apologies if I have missed any recorrections.
  • You're responding to something that you suppose I've said, not that I've actually said. I'm not suggesting that the relevant actors are teenage communists with Che Guevara posters in their bedrooms. Of course Black Rock are acting to maximise their bottom line - the suggestion that they wanted Truss booted is entirely based on the fact that her deregulatory agenda could have changed the economy in a fashion not conducive to their profits.

    There's an interesting interview with Julian Bishop from the Brunner Investment group here: https://youtu.be/zN3QSJkn_6c?si=UxqdnHBBe5-eDy8m

    One of the most depressing parts is where Bishop recalls that he made his group's displeasure at BP's plans to invest in more capacity clear to the management (the group is a major investor) - because such plans undermined the profits they could make from the high price of energy. Bishop evidently doesn't think of himself as a bad person, and he may even think he's being a good person - he speaks warmly about 'the real price of energy' - there is a convenient aligment between his wish to cut supply and price gouge the consumer, and what he sees as an environmental mission. But it's a very real example of someone in a powerful position acting against supply-side economics that would benefit consumers and the overall British economy.

    I say I have no evidence that Black Rock's buying and selling during the minibudget turbulence was aimed at unseating Truss and her policies, because I don’t. But it's incredibly naive to think that they would not do so if the financial rewards were not there. Why spend several hundred thousand pounds retaining George Osborne if you're not thoroughly invested in the politics of the Tory Party?
    So we had your shilling for Putin over MH17 and Ukrainian biolabs, and now you're so incredibly desperate to clear Truss that you invent, with no evidence, a conspiracy to bring down her government.

    Occam's razor applies: Truss was politically inept and made a series of unforced decisions that upset the market. The thing about this alternative is that it matches the behaviour we have seen since she was defenestrated.
  • Far be it for me to speak on behalf of Reeves, but even your low tax, low energy Conservative Government had they won the election would be looking at tax rises and service cuts. Fortunately for them, they lost.

    I had written you a lengthy reply but Vanilla who have a history of keeping even deleted comments disposed of my points when I allowed my phone to close as I was pondering my next comment.

    Everyone should be welcome to legitimately criticise missteps by this Government. I am happy to call out the WFA fiasco, something hopefully Reeves will have resolved by the budget. However commentary on Casino's dystopian imagination, William Glenn's retweets of Farage or GB News extrapolations, much like his pro-Trump, Anti-Harris (incidentally autocorrected too antichrist!) fare are best left unread. I won't bother going into the return of the prodigal son's multiple unhinged posts from Kotor last night, suffice to say I do wonder whether PB is for me anymore, and it does seem a number of moderate posters have already voted with their feet.

    Anyway, I will assure you that you'd have loved my lengthy monologue. It's a shame Vanilla decided you were not to read it.

    P S. The new improved Vanilla seems to have an improved autocorrect, so apologies if I have missed any recorrections.
    Please stay.

    Conservatives are going to have to shift to opposition; something the party or (IMV) their supporters have not managed well so far.

    But Labourites (and lefties as a whole...) are going to have to shift away from opposition and to defence of hard decisions - a few of which will be wrong, as all governments make mistakes. I fear many Labour supporters will continue in opposition mode - against their own government, if only because it is morally purer not to compromise on hard decisions.
  • Andy_JS said:

    "Stop testing children on times tables, unions tell ministers
    Teachers demand grammar exams are also stripped back to ‘curb student anxiety’"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/08/31/stop-testing-children-on-times-tables-unions-tell-ministers/

    What a stupid idea. Tests are important, both for the kids and the school.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 31,183
    edited September 2024

    Please stay.

    Conservatives are going to have to shift to opposition; something the party or (IMV) their supporters have not managed well so far.

    But Labourites (and lefties as a whole...) are going to have to shift away from opposition and to defence of hard decisions - a few of which will be wrong, as all governments make mistakes. I fear many Labour supporters will continue in opposition mode - against their own government, if only because it is morally purer not to compromise on hard decisions.
    To be fair Jessops you have been one of the welcome voices of reason.

    I think Parties of Government and individuals should be called out. WFA debacle, fair enough, made up, yet to be announced tax rises, not so much. The new Rachmanesque MP by all means, but William Glenn demanding Rayner be vilified for going to Ibiza is ridiculous.

    It's been quite amenable around here of late and then the football hooligan returned home last night. Hopefully I can find better things to do with my time.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,453
    edited September 2024
    Good morning, everyone.

    F1: Betfair has Verstappen 24 to win. This is not a tip, but an observation of how dramatically this season has swung. He won all but one of the first 5-6 races.

    Slept atrociously, again, but given how poor my bets have been this year maybe the lack of sleep will actually improve the results...

    Edited extra bit: also, Ladbrokes has a Winner Without Norris market.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,475

    Why are the focusing on this stuff in first 100 days?

    Bonkers.
    Continuity Sunak.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,353

    What a stupid idea. Tests are important, both for the kids and the school.
    It's the Telegraph and unions, so it's probably BS.

    The tests that really need to go are SATs, which are used by precisely nobody of any importance and written by people who've attended about sixteen of Acland-Hood's works meetings before setting pen to paper.

    But those look set to stay.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,482
    .
    Andy_JS said:

    It would be except for the fact that polls are one of the main things we usually discuss on this particular site regardless of anything else. 😊
    I'll start paying attention to them ahead of the next set of local elections. Until then, there's a big betting event coming up, and the UK polls are of little interest.
    Apart perhaps from the reaction to the autumn budget.
  • Betting Post

    F1: rather flailed around with this but finally went for Stroll at 3 to win group 4 (Tsunoda and the Alpines). He has the car to do it.

    https://enormo-haddock.blogspot.com/2024/09/italy-pre-race-2024.html
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,482

    To be fair Jessops you have been one of the welcome voices of reason.

    I think Parties of Government and individuals should be called out. WFA debacle, fair enough, made up, yet to be announced tax rises, not so much. The new Rachmanesque MP by all means, but William Glenn demanding Rayner be vilified for going to Ibiza is ridiculous.

    It's been quite amenable around here of late and then the football hooligan returned home last night. Hopefully I can find better things to do with my time.
    Avoid late evening, and you'll probably miss most of the hooligan.
    In any event, if you do leave, please drop by occasionally. Your contributions are valued.
  • I see Starmer means that we’re losing the best of us. Tragic.

    https://x.com/calvinrobinson/status/1829437858777637211?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,353

    I see Starmer means that we’re losing the best of us. Tragic.

    https://x.com/calvinrobinson/status/1829437858777637211?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q

    Father Calvin?

    There's a delicious irony if ever there was one...
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,482
    Any English professors like to weigh in ?

    Trump: I'll talk about like nine different things and they all come back brilliantly together. And it's like, friends of mine that are like English professors, they say it's the most brilliant thing I've ever seen. But the fake news, they say, he rambled. It’s not rambling
    https://x.com/Acyn/status/1829628242212335747
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,353
    edited September 2024
    Nigelb said:

    Any English professors like to weigh in ?

    Trump: I'll talk about like nine different things and they all come back brilliantly together. And it's like, friends of mine that are like English professors, they say it's the most brilliant thing I've ever seen. But the fake news, they say, he rambled. It’s not rambling
    https://x.com/Acyn/status/1829628242212335747

    I think that's a beautiful example of irony.

    Not perhaps the most brilliant I've ever seen. He's never encountered Stuart Dickson or Leon. But very good, nevertheless.
  • Nigelb said:

    Any English professors like to weigh in ?

    Trump: I'll talk about like nine different things and they all come back brilliantly together. And it's like, friends of mine that are like English professors, they say it's the most brilliant thing I've ever seen. But the fake news, they say, he rambled. It’s not rambling
    https://x.com/Acyn/status/1829628242212335747

    Oddly reminiscent of Stewart Lee.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,132
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,132
    NEW: polling of Conservative members in The Mail on Sunday

    *Prospective match-ups*

    Tugendhat 44% VS Jenrick 32%

    Badenoch 34% VS Jenrick 35%

    Tugendhat 48% VS Patel 40%

    Badenoch 38% VS Patel 29%

    Jenrick 42% VS Patel 35%

    Badenoch 42% VS Tugendhat 39%

    https://x.com/JLPartnersPolls/status/1830123800202969120?t=eVGg77q-WjZqKzAqVylmsQ&s=19

    Some slightly anomalous ones there. It's a bit rock, paper, scissors.
  • Dr. Foxy, I'm re-reading Donald Kagan's history of the Peloponnesian War, during which nuance died as a credible position in the polarised factionalism. It's possible the Conservative opinion is indicative of this, regarding Reform.

    However, it's worth remembering the left have long enjoyed deriding those who have a different opinion, with Never Kissed A Tory t-shirts and the current deputy PM describing them as 'scum' and refusing to apologise repeatedly before it was dragged out of her (I forget if that was before or after an MP was murdered).
  • rcs1000 said:

    This is the kind of comment that makes me put my head in my hands.

    The vast, vast majority of funds that Blackrock runs are tracker funds. They are passive funds that own the entire index. There is no boss making decisions: if someone puts money into the Blackrock FTSE-100 Tracker, then Blackrock buys the underlying equities. If someone sells shares in the tracker, then it sells the underlying shares.

    If Blackrock - with their passive index tracker - were to do anything else, then they would be breaking the law.

    That's what passive funds do.
    That is interesting to know, but I'm not sure how it's relevant. Afaics a very small minority of their bond holdings that are in managed funds with BR making the buying and selling decisions would still account for vast sums of capital. The person who expounded the idea evidently supposed this to be plenty enough to spearhead the disturbances we saw - are you prepared to declare this to be impossible?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,251
    viewcode said:

    At this rate he will be appointing someone to check under the bed before they switch the big light off, and somebody to check if people have flushed after a big poo.
    You've got it wrong.

    The toilet inspector will not allow you to flush until after a suitable amount of waste has accumulated, so as to minimize water usage.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,251
    Off topic, and it was my topic too: i saw the movie Rush yesterday, and really enjoyed it.
  • Foxy said:
    Interesting?
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,050
    Nigelb said:

    Any English professors like to weigh in ?

    Trump: I'll talk about like nine different things and they all come back brilliantly together. And it's like, friends of mine that are like English professors, they say it's the most brilliant thing I've ever seen. But the fake news, they say, he rambled. It’s not rambling
    https://x.com/Acyn/status/1829628242212335747

    I assume this is a direct result of his "people don't eat bacon because of windmills" ramble speech

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,353
    rcs1000 said:

    You've got it wrong.

    The toilet inspector will not allow you to flush until after a suitable amount of waste has accumulated, so as to minimize water usage.
    Just throw the toilet inspector in. Job's a good 'un.
  • NEW THREAD

  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 44,026
    TimS said:

    Because it doesn’t cost much money. They can’t afford the other more important stuff.
    Yet they can afford 10B + for the doctors and train drivers who are among the highest paid in the country , that is really bonkers.
  • rcs1000 said:

    Off topic, and it was my topic too: i saw the movie Rush yesterday, and really enjoyed it.

    The Hunt/Lauda one released ten or so years ago? Yes, it was excellent.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 98,423
    Cookie said:

    Huh.
    If it prevents another series of Good Omens (Series 1 - essentially a fairly faithful rewrite of the book he wrote with Terry Pratchett in the 90s - brilliant; Series 2 - Neil Gaiman alone - awful) then I'm on board.

    A pity. I used to like his work last century.
    Nothing happened in Good Omens Series 2. Character interactions were a fun part of the book and series 1, but there was also shit actually going on, with real stakes.
This discussion has been closed.