politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » A Brexit Carol – how last time is shaping views of GE2019

There is a ghost which is stalking this election in the media coverage, and it is the spirit of 2017. Everywhere one looks right leaning journalists are fretting and not quite believing the polls. The spirit of Election 2017 and a good ghost for Labour it is too – “Oh Jeremy Corbyn !”.
Comments
-
Fiirst.. maybe ...0
-
Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.6 -
One thing I can't square: a lot of people genuinely thought Theresa was the Second Coming (effigies erected on the cliffs of Dover etc.), but almost everybody thinks Boris is a bit of an arse. So how can the latter be doing better then the former when nothing else has changed?0
-
We need a name for the new party. ConBrex...BrexCon...The ConMen ....KipperCons....BluKips....The shits
Good Header Pulp! After giving me the two correct results out of two I was interested in I'm following you big time!!0 -
Oh, and thanks, Pulpstar! Love the header picture.0
-
The conmen will work...Roger said:We need a name for the new party. ConBrex...BrexCon...The ConMen ....KipperCons....BluKips....The shits
Good Header Pulp! After giving me the two correct results i was interested in I'm following you big time!!0 -
Nice.RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.0 -
They appear to have become a remain party to leavers and a leave party to remainers. This is the opposite of and the biggest change to 2017 where they pulled the trick of appearing to be a leave party to leavers and a remain party to remainers.
Excellent article and if you're right a more apt comparison for Labour is Lib Dems in 2015.
Lib Dems succeeded in the past by being "not the Tories" to left-leaning voters and "not Labour" to right-leaning voters but after the Coalition they were unable to repeat that trick. Right leaning voters worried they'd put in Labour and left-leaning voters worried they'd put in the Tories. Better to vote for what you believe in than a party you can't rely upon.
Labour look in danger of repeating the same fate as the Lib Dems in 2015. From appealing to both sides to appealing to neither.1 -
Time has changed by over two years.Stark_Dawning said:One thing I can't square: a lot of people genuinely thought Theresa was the Second Coming (effigies erected on the cliffs of Dover etc.), but almost everybody thinks Boris is a bit of an arse. So how can the latter be doing better then the former when nothing else has changed?
Learning and experiences have permeated the electorate.0 -
"Everywhere one looks the written media is observing this election as a closish horse race “You can’t rely on labour leavers to not revert to type” twitter journalists type."
Because they're right. Sorry, I wish it wasn't true, but it is.
Labour have been heading Northwards in the polls since the start of the campaign, and will continue to do so.0 -
Rumour has it that Nigel Farage has been offered a peerage. Is there any truth in this? Sir Nigel could then hang up his spurs for good.
Boris has the horrific prospect of surviving the TV debates ahead of him, there will be the usual audience plant hoping to spike Corbyn, who has nothing to lose. It should be interesting.0 -
On topic: I think Pulpstar is probably right. Of course there is no such thing as 'objective truth' in trying to guess how voters will actually behave when they cast their votes, but there's no particular reason to suppose that it will be a repeat of 2017, and lots of reasons to suppose it won't. In particular I don't think the vile but effective Momentum social-media campaign of 2017 will work again to anything like the same extent. Once bitten, twice shy.0
-
Today’s announcement certainly consolidates what we’re against. Cameron must be turning in his political grave.Roger said:We need a name for the new party. ConBrex...BrexCon...The ConMen ....KipperCons....BluKips....The shits
Good Header Pulp! After giving me the two correct results out of two I was interested in I'm following you big time!!0 -
Thanks Rod, that's kind of cute!RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
The takeaway is, I suppose, that whilst there's less evidence this time round of a Labour recovery the gap it needs to close is smaller. No?0 -
There was a poll ten days ago which put Labour on 21%???Richard_Nabavi said:
Nice.RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.0 -
That's very useful, thank youRobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.0 -
Blind faith, dogma, and a determination to Brexit, whatever that might mean and whatever the consequences.Stark_Dawning said:One thing I can't square: a lot of people genuinely thought Theresa was the Second Coming (effigies erected on the cliffs of Dover etc.), but almost everybody thinks Boris is a bit of an arse. So how can the latter be doing better then the former when nothing else has changed?
0 -
Yeah, a YouGov one.TheWhiteRabbit said:
There was a poll ten days ago which put Labour on 21%???Richard_Nabavi said:
Nice.RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.0 -
Rod?Peter_the_Punter said:
Thanks Rod, that's kind of cute!RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
The takeaway is, I suppose, that whilst there's less evidence this time round of a Labour recovery the gap it needs to close is smaller. No?
Both parties are trending upwards - but no guarantee either will continue to do so. We all remember what happened in 2010.0 -
I do apologise, Bob.RobD said:
Rod?Peter_the_Punter said:
Thanks Rod, that's kind of cute!RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
The takeaway is, I suppose, that whilst there's less evidence this time round of a Labour recovery the gap it needs to close is smaller. No?
Both parties are trending upwards - but no guarantee either will continue to do so. We all remember what happened in 2010.1 -
Because May showed herself incapable of delivering Leave, and Boris is thought to be a better bet.Stark_Dawning said:One thing I can't square: a lot of people genuinely thought Theresa was the Second Coming (effigies erected on the cliffs of Dover etc.), but almost everybody thinks Boris is a bit of an arse. So how can the latter be doing better then the former when nothing else has changed?
0 -
That could be the most prescient of posts.Philip_Thompson said:They appear to have become a remain party to leavers and a leave party to remainers. This is the opposite of and the biggest change to 2017 where they pulled the trick of appearing to be a leave party to leavers and a remain party to remainers.
Excellent article and if you're right a more apt comparison for Labour is Lib Dems in 2015.
Lib Dems succeeded in the past by being "not the Tories" to left-leaning voters and "not Labour" to right-leaning voters but after the Coalition they were unable to repeat that trick. Right leaning voters worried they'd put in Labour and left-leaning voters worried they'd put in the Tories. Better to vote for what you believe in than a party you can't rely upon.
Labour look in danger of repeating the same fate as the Lib Dems in 2015. From appealing to both sides to appealing to neither.
Labour down to 7 seats?0 -
Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
She decided to p off the voters by putting out a ridiculously unpopular care policy and hid from scrutiny all campaign.Stark_Dawning said:One thing I can't square: a lot of people genuinely thought Theresa was the Second Coming (effigies erected on the cliffs of Dover etc.), but almost everybody thinks Boris is a bit of an arse. So how can the latter be doing better then the former when nothing else has changed?
0 -
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.0 -
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.0 -
pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
Whose core vote will ultimately prevail? I know where my money is, literally, and it ain't with this thread header.0 -
There are very few seats where I'd actually like to the see the Conservatives unseat a Labour MP, but that is definitely one. I would fucking love it if Skinner lost to a blue.Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.0 -
On topic, this is what I have said since the campaign started. We have got to stop thinking in terms of the last battle. That’s not to say that we should assume any outcome (I still think we’re in HP to slim Tory majority territory) but just because the labour vote recovered in 2017 doesn’t mean it will happen again.
They will poll at least 29-30% though, IMHO.0 -
Could you add the trendlines (and r² values)?RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
Ta0 -
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
I'm not sure PBC has gone all anti-Corbyn. There seem far more people here willing to support him here than there are IRL. And I work in the public sector.Mysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
Whose core vote will ultimately prevail? I know where my money is, literally, and it ain't with this thread header.
Which, I suppose, gives the lie to my previous comment. I'll try and calm down a bit.0 -
Can't say I've seen much of Boris beyond a few well-managed photo-opps, but I expect he'll be along in a bit.numbertwelve said:
She decided to p off the voters by putting out a ridiculously unpopular care policy and hid from scrutiny all campaign.Stark_Dawning said:One thing I can't square: a lot of people genuinely thought Theresa was the Second Coming (effigies erected on the cliffs of Dover etc.), but almost everybody thinks Boris is a bit of an arse. So how can the latter be doing better then the former when nothing else has changed?
0 -
Yep.Black_Rook said:"Everywhere one looks the written media is observing this election as a closish horse race “You can’t rely on labour leavers to not revert to type” twitter journalists type."
Because they're right. Sorry, I wish it wasn't true, but it is.
Labour have been heading Northwards in the polls since the start of the campaign, and will continue to do so.
Spot on.
0 -
Conversely if Corbyn goes too critical of the Tory Brexit stance he pushes some more of his voters into the arms of Con/BXP, quite possibly in the seats that matter.Mysticrose said:
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.
Catch 220 -
“The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's how the smart money bets.”numbertwelve said:On topic, this is what I have said since the campaign started. We have got to stop thinking in terms of the last battle. That’s not to say that we should assume any outcome (I still think we’re in HP to slim Tory majority territory) but just because the labour vote recovered in 2017 doesn’t mean it will happen again.
They will poll at least 29-30% though, IMHO.
― Damon Runyon
-is the principle to bear in mind.
0 -
If you are right, there will be a few shirts lostMysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
Whose core vote will ultimately prevail? I know where my money is, literally, and it ain't with this thread header.0 -
No I meant officially. Threads on 'who will be next Labour leader' and writing him off.Cookie said:
I'm not sure PBC has gone all anti-Corbyn. There seem far more people here willing to support him here than there are IRL. And I work in the public sector.Mysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
Whose core vote will ultimately prevail? I know where my money is, literally, and it ain't with this thread header.
Which, I suppose, gives the lie to my previous comment. I'll try and calm down a bit.
Deja vu.0 -
-
I don't believe that they won't put him in in returnfor the promise of a referendum. They'll think they can control him. Like tha nationalists in Germany in the 1930s.HYUFD said:
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
Labour will poll 22-25% the result depends on where their vote goes.0
-
Agreed. Today is a better day for Labour than for the Lib Dems.Mysticrose said:
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.
And a bad day for democracy, because once again, FPTP is eating our choices. Much as I think TBP are scum, they are scum that some people want to vote for and won't get the chance. And that's not right.0 -
I was thinking about adding a moving average rather than a linear trendline, but I could give it a shot (not till later though...)MaxPB said:
Could you add the trendlines (and r² values)?RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
Ta0 -
Absolutely. Underlined what we’re up against. Hope LD/Lab vote remembers how to organise itself.Mysticrose said:
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.0 -
That would be hilarious, but I do not think those ex-Labour voters will be going Tory so do not be expecting 500 MPs on your sideMarqueeMark said:
That could be the most prescient of posts.Philip_Thompson said:They appear to have become a remain party to leavers and a leave party to remainers. This is the opposite of and the biggest change to 2017 where they pulled the trick of appearing to be a leave party to leavers and a remain party to remainers.
Excellent article and if you're right a more apt comparison for Labour is Lib Dems in 2015.
Lib Dems succeeded in the past by being "not the Tories" to left-leaning voters and "not Labour" to right-leaning voters but after the Coalition they were unable to repeat that trick. Right leaning voters worried they'd put in Labour and left-leaning voters worried they'd put in the Tories. Better to vote for what you believe in than a party you can't rely upon.
Labour look in danger of repeating the same fate as the Lib Dems in 2015. From appealing to both sides to appealing to neither.
Labour down to 7 seats?0 -
... and a few hats eaten.Beibheirli_C said:
If you are right, there will be a few shirts lostMysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
Whose core vote will ultimately prevail? I know where my money is, literally, and it ain't with this thread header.0 -
Could Labour shaft the Lib Dems by standing down in Richmond Park (and perhaps any other similar ultra close marginals)? It would force the Lib dems to show some reciprocity in Canterbury etc or risk being seen as sabotaging the remain alliance. At which point it becomes clear that Labour are Remain's best bet regardless sof the LD revoke policy (which was only ever if they were to get a majority anyway, and that has been out of the question for a long time now)0
-
The striking thing about that chart is the gradient of the labour climb last time (and the lower Tory start). While Lab superficially seems to be matching the climb so far, I think it's optimstic to assume a repeat, and even last time they didn't win.Richard_Nabavi said:
Nice.RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.0 -
Or you could just look at the data.MaxPB said:
Could you add the trendlines (and r² values)?RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
Ta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anscombe's_quartet0 -
Compared to the only alternative, Boris is one of the most wildly popular PM candidates ever put forward.Mysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
0 -
Cheers, I think for this purpose the linear trendline probably makes more sense as it will show how things have changed from day 0 (and how that compares to the 2017 trendline from a complete dataset), the moving average is better for a nowcast though.RobD said:
I was thinking about adding a moving average rather than a linear trendline, but I could give it a shot (not till later though...)MaxPB said:
Could you add the trendlines (and r² values)?RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
Ta0 -
That's why Jezza has to contrast his cuddly Brexit with Boris's Trumpian one. From what we know of Nigel, he hates Boris and Dom with a passion, so he must reckon that today's decision will screw them in some way. I suspect he's calculated that the re-toxification of the Tory brand through association with TBP will be prove more harmful to Boris than a few voter defections will prove helpful. Nigel wants another hung parliament and death by extension.numbertwelve said:
Conversely if Corbyn goes too critical of the Tory Brexit stance he pushes some more of his voters into the arms of Con/BXP, quite possibly in the seats that matter.Mysticrose said:
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.
Catch 220 -
Yes but the picture is much clearer now than in 2017RobD said:
That's a very low figure.nichomar said:Labour will poll 22-25% the result depends on where their vote goes.
A brexit policy which, as the thread header, says satisfy nobody
EHRC about to report
Chaos with candidate selection
Nationalization policies which when thought about are a waste of money
A very poor front bench, even worse than the tories
Etc etc
I wouldn’t vote for red or blue but it’s clear many people can’t vote red, who knows where their vote will Go?0 -
I've previously predicted 32-35%. I think Labour will be averaging no less than 31% in the polls by next weekend, then after that it's all about finding exactly where their ceiling is.numbertwelve said:On topic, this is what I have said since the campaign started. We have got to stop thinking in terms of the last battle. That’s not to say that we should assume any outcome (I still think we’re in HP to slim Tory majority territory) but just because the labour vote recovered in 2017 doesn’t mean it will happen again.
They will poll at least 29-30% though, IMHO.
I don't see them getting up to 40% again by the end of the campaign - the LD revival isn't going to evaporate entirely, and Corbyn's dire leadership ratings will have an effect somewhere in excess of zero - but if Labour end up at the top end of that range (and I'm beginning to suspect that they will) then it's going to be tight. Either another Hung Parliament or a small Tory majority, most likely in single figures and probably not in excess of 20.
Any Con majority sees the Withdrawal Agreement passed and any of about 5 or more should, given the average age and health status of the modern MP, see them safe for a full Parliament. Although sorting out the future relationship with the EU under those circumstances would be great fun for Boris Johnson, I'm sure.
Anything short of a Con majority and we're probably heading for another election in the first half of 2020. A Labour performance good enough to rule with SNP votes alone doesn't look like it's on the cards, and a wobbly Remain alliance featuring the Lib Dems and other bits and pieces won't be able to agree on anything except stopping Brexit.0 -
They won't, they will vote for an EU referendum amemdment but they will not make Corbyn PM, if they did so all the gains they had made in the Home Counties from the Tories to hold the balance of power would go straight back to the Tories.Cookie said:
I don't believe that they won't put him in in returnfor the promise of a referendum. They'll think they can control him. Like tha nationalists in Germany in the 1930s.HYUFD said:
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!
Though interesting you compare Corbyn to Hitler0 -
Farage has been forced into this by his party and falling poll numbers.Stark_Dawning said:
That's why Jezza has to contrast his cuddly Brexit with Boris's Trumpian one. From what we know of Nigel, he hates Boris and Dom with a passion, so he must reckon that today's decision will screw them in some way. I suspect he's calculated that the re-toxification of the Tory brand through association with TBP will be prove more harmful to Boris than a few voter defections will prove helpful. Nigel wants another hung parliament and death by extension.numbertwelve said:
Conversely if Corbyn goes too critical of the Tory Brexit stance he pushes some more of his voters into the arms of Con/BXP, quite possibly in the seats that matter.Mysticrose said:
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.
Catch 220 -
Hence the r² value...viewcode said:
Or you could just look at the data.MaxPB said:
Could you add the trendlines (and r² values)?RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
Ta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anscombe's_quartet0 -
But almost any alternative in the labour party would too. Why poison yourself by putting Corbyn in?Cookie said:
I don't believe that they won't put him in in returnfor the promise of a referendum. They'll think they can control him. Like tha nationalists in Germany in the 1930s.HYUFD said:
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
Today's news changes things a lot more then people think.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.0 -
-
Lol. Does anyone give a fuck what that serial loser thinks?Noo said:0 -
I think it motivates remainers to vote tactically even where there is no formal alliance.nunu2 said:
Today's news changes things a lot more then people think.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.0 -
Been speaking to a few of my brexiteer Tyneside/County Durham friends tonight. They are convinced that the Brexit Party will win scores of MPs and will go into coalition with the Tories to ensure Brexit will be done properly.
They are all voting Brexit Party...
Hmm..
0 -
Game changer in Cambridgeshire as Tory Police and Crime Commissioner forced to resign.0
-
Do we know what Laura Bush thinks?Noo said:0 -
And the plurality of voters that picked her in 2016. And a lot of people who admire her for speaking up against a fascist foreign government interfering in both parties in the USA, when a lot of other politicians are hunkering down and waiting for someone else to do it. Clinton is a brave and principled woman, whatever you personally think of her policies.MaxPB said:0 -
The Lib Dems will, given the chance, install Corbyn because somebody has to be Prime Minister, and the only two candidates will be the Conservative leader and the Labour leader. The Conservative leader can't give them the chance to Remain, so they must install the Labour one.HYUFD said:
They won't, they will vote for an EU referendum amemdment but they will not make Corbyn PM, if they did so all the gains they had made in the Home Counties from the Tories to hold the balance of power would go straight back to the Tories.Cookie said:
I don't believe that they won't put him in in returnfor the promise of a referendum. They'll think they can control him. Like tha nationalists in Germany in the 1930s.HYUFD said:
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!
Trying to wish Jeremy Corbyn away, even if they close their eyes and imagine Keir Starmer is the actual Labour leader really, really hard, won't work. They will have to treat with him to get what they want.
The only possible getout is if the Conservatives fall so far short of a majority that the Lib Dems can abstain, and the other Opposition parties still have the numbers to outvote them. It's possible, of course, but it seems unlikely.0 -
That is a bit of a Wow!!!!HYUFD said:0 -
LOL, one whiff of ministerial cars and they will be signed upHYUFD said:
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
More like he has been bought offGabs2 said:
Farage has been forced into this by his party and falling poll numbers.Stark_Dawning said:
That's why Jezza has to contrast his cuddly Brexit with Boris's Trumpian one. From what we know of Nigel, he hates Boris and Dom with a passion, so he must reckon that today's decision will screw them in some way. I suspect he's calculated that the re-toxification of the Tory brand through association with TBP will be prove more harmful to Boris than a few voter defections will prove helpful. Nigel wants another hung parliament and death by extension.numbertwelve said:
Conversely if Corbyn goes too critical of the Tory Brexit stance he pushes some more of his voters into the arms of Con/BXP, quite possibly in the seats that matter.Mysticrose said:
For Labour you mean? I think so. A huge outcry about the stitch up but more pertinently, it means Corbyn can hammer home the message that a vote for Johnson is a vote for Farage-Trump and a No Deal Brexit next year. Potent message for Labour.Jonathan said:
Today helps rally the troops.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
Twitter is all agog.
Catch 221 -
I bet this proves to be the most accurate prediction on here this side of the election.Black_Rook said:
I've previously predicted 32-35%. I think Labour will be averaging no less than 31% in the polls by next weekend, then after that it's all about finding exactly where their ceiling is.numbertwelve said:On topic, this is what I have said since the campaign started. We have got to stop thinking in terms of the last battle. That’s not to say that we should assume any outcome (I still think we’re in HP to slim Tory majority territory) but just because the labour vote recovered in 2017 doesn’t mean it will happen again.
They will poll at least 29-30% though, IMHO.
I don't see them getting up to 40% again by the end of the campaign - the LD revival isn't going to evaporate entirely, and Corbyn's dire leadership ratings will have an effect somewhere in excess of zero -0 -
Great work, Rob.RobD said:Relevant to this thread, a plot I quickly threw together showing the share of Tory and Labour in 2017 (crosses) and 2019 (circles). If I have time I'll try to add trendlines...
https://imgur.com/wlZXn52
Edit: not sure how to make it less huge, sorry about that.
I think that explains people’s nervousness too: will Labour consolidate around 29-30%, or keep trending up to polling day?
We just don’t know.1 -
Do parties with a couple of dozen MPs tend to be able to dictate who the leader of parties with in excess of 200 MPs is? The LDs would put the devil himself in No. 10 in exchange for a chance to Remain.philiph said:
But almost any alternative in the labour party would too. Why poison yourself by putting Corbyn in?Cookie said:
I don't believe that they won't put him in in returnfor the promise of a referendum. They'll think they can control him. Like tha nationalists in Germany in the 1930s.HYUFD said:
How is Corbyn going to become PM given the only realistic possible way the Tories lose their majority is if the LDs hold the balance of power and they will refuse to make Corbyn PM?Cookie said:Good article Pulpstar - but I still don't believe it. I think Cons might have reaches a ceiling in seats like Bolsover - everyone in Bolsover who was ever going to vote Conservativedis so last time. And it wasn't enough, and still won't be enough this time. The 2017 Conservatives got almost as many votea as any party has ever got - they're only going downwards from there. Meanwhile, voters, it seems, genuinely don't care about candidates like Sultana in Coventry South. As long as you're not a Tory, you can pretty much say what you like and people will still vote for you.
So despite your excellent analysis, I'm still expecting a convincing Labour revival over the next few weeks, and increasingly Corbyn as PM. If we're lucky, a handful of LD MPs and some Scot Nats who are largely disinterested inwhat haooens to England and Wales will be stong enough to keep a far-left Labour Party leadership who admire revolutionary communism in check until a saner leader or a saner party can be conjured up from somewhere.
I very much hope you are right and I am wrong!0 -
The Lib Dems only become relevant if Labour get below 270 or so, possibly lower. Otherwise Labour can just rely on the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens.Black_Rook said:
The Lib Dems will, given the chance, install Corbyn because somebody has to be Prime Minister, and the only two candidates will be the Conservative leader and the Labour leader. The Conservative leader can't give them the chance to Remain, so they must install the Labour one.HYUFD said:
They won't, they will vote for an EU referendum amemdment but they will not make Corbyn PM, if they did so all the gains they had made in the Home Counties from the Tories to hold the balance of power would go straight back to the Tories.
Trying to wish Jeremy Corbyn away, even if they close their eyes and imagine Keir Starmer is the actual Labour leader really, really hard, won't work. They will have to treat with him to get what they want.
The only possible getout is if the Conservatives fall so far short of a majority that the Lib Dems can abstain, and the other Opposition parties still have the numbers to outvote them. It's possible, of course, but it seems unlikely.
So it’s considerably more likely than not that the Lib Dems only come into the mix if Labour has gone backwards in the seat count from last time. If so, there’s a very different dynamic to party negotiations. One more heave isn’t going to be remotely credible. The party leader would have demonstrably failed.0 -
If Labour had moderate leadership they wouldn’t be miles ahead in this election.maaarsh said:
Compared to the only alternative, Boris is one of the most wildly popular PM candidates ever put forward.Mysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
There wouldn’t be an election because Boris figures wouldn’t look so bad in the commons, he wouldn’t have sent the DUP under a bus nor his liberal Tories to the gallows harangued on the way by Dom if he thought there would be an election up against a moderate labour leader,0 -
Just name them after the PM - Porky F***in Blunders.Roger said:We need a name for the new party. ConBrex...BrexCon...The ConMen ....KipperCons....BluKips....The shits
Good Header Pulp! After giving me the two correct results out of two I was interested in I'm following you big time!!0 -
A colleague of mine who’s working on the Palace of Westminster restoration project spoke to a Parliamentary clerk today about the election.Black_Rook said:
I've previously predicted 32-35%. I think Labour will be averaging no less than 31% in the polls by next weekend, then after that it's all about finding exactly where their ceiling is.numbertwelve said:On topic, this is what I have said since the campaign started. We have got to stop thinking in terms of the last battle. That’s not to say that we should assume any outcome (I still think we’re in HP to slim Tory majority territory) but just because the labour vote recovered in 2017 doesn’t mean it will happen again.
They will poll at least 29-30% though, IMHO.
I don't see them getting up to 40% again by the end of the campaign - the LD revival isn't going to evaporate entirely, and Corbyn's dire leadership ratings will have an effect somewhere in excess of zero - but if Labour end up at the top end of that range (and I'm beginning to suspect that they will) then it's going to be tight. Either another Hung Parliament or a small Tory majority, most likely in single figures and probably not in excess of 20.
Any Con majority sees the Withdrawal Agreement passed and any of about 5 or more should, given the average age and health status of the modern MP, see them safe for a full Parliament. Although sorting out the future relationship with the EU under those circumstances would be great fun for Boris Johnson, I'm sure.
Anything short of a Con majority and we're probably heading for another election in the first half of 2020. A Labour performance good enough to rule with SNP votes alone doesn't look like it's on the cards, and a wobbly Remain alliance featuring the Lib Dems and other bits and pieces won't be able to agree on anything except stopping Brexit.
He thinks we’re facing a GE every 18 months or so for the next decade.0 -
A former Secretary of State with extensive knowledge about Russia and direct personal experience of Russian interference in elections? Yes I’d say her view is worth hearing.Big_G_NorthWales said:1 -
Do we know if the pollsters polling Labour now have corrected for undershooting for them last time and, if so, how and what the effect of this is?0
-
If they get within 5 with some tv Boris is toast.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.
But all companies would have to consistently say within 5 in the last week of campaign.0 -
LAB remains a real threat! Lots of people on benefits and those 'rich through mummy and daddy' who think that voting LAB demonstrates a social conscience!
Beware the CORBYN1 -
The Boris Farage Pact a hugely significant moment in this campaign. It will either help Brexit Party and Conservatives or backfire. Inside a bubble where you can’t see the difference anyway between Boris Tories and Brexit Party under Farage, this makes little difference other than idea it wont split the Brexit vote. So very good news.
On the other hand outside that bubble where Farage is very right of centre and his love for No Deal Brexit extreme, how many BP votes hinged on not being Tory, how many Tory votes hinged on not being Farage?
The guardian if you haven’t read it, can’t stop laughing at Farage for his climb down.
“If this was supposed to be a rally, you’d have to call it Triumph of the Willy. Here was a guy who’d spent 10 days bullishly making Johnson an offer he couldn’t refuse, (not forgetting a 10 point demolition of Boris deal, a deal that hasn’t changed a jot) it seems the PM does not negotiate with Faragists. The Brexit party leader is one of those hapless movie villains who tells a millionaire he’s kidnapped his wife, and the millionaire goes – great, you can keep her.”
I’m not so sure the Guardian has got this right, their position takes people on their word about what happened. Nigel said he got his assurances from a video in a Boris tweet, but with Tice and Farage both offered peerages there’s clearly been backroom discussions going on, so I agree with the BP members who feel there’s been a backroom meeting and stitch up.0 -
Will the Brexit Broadcast Corporation be putting Nick Boles vote for the Lib Dems as headline news or is it the case they only bother if it’s a vote for Bozo .0
-
I try to take this on board, but am too aware of the ghost of 2017 I suspect. It's the same reason as a Liverpool fan I'm not at all confident despite being 8 points clear after 12 games.
0 -
The next important moment is when the candidate lists are revealed and which labour seats have TBP fighting the election
Do not be surprised if some or more marginals do not have any TBP representation
I expect Arron Banks and Farage are in further talks over this0 -
She’s remarkably arrogant and lacking in self-awareness.Big_G_NorthWales said:
And, helpfully, thinks any criticism of her must be sexist or motivated by jealousy thus allowing her to be entirely dismissive of it.0 -
If Labour had moderate leadership there wouldn't never have been a 2017 election, we would have Brexited in March and PM May would be negotiating the terms of a FTA at the moment.egg said:
If Labour had moderate leadership they wouldn’t be miles ahead in this election.maaarsh said:
Compared to the only alternative, Boris is one of the most wildly popular PM candidates ever put forward.Mysticrose said:pb has officially gone all anti-Corbyn which is fine but it's ignoring the fact that, actually, the tories aren't doing particularly well either and Johnson's not THAT popular.
There wouldn’t be an election because Boris figures wouldn’t look so bad in the commons, he wouldn’t have sent the DUP under a bus nor his liberal Tories to the gallows harangued on the way by Dom if he thought there would be an election up against a moderate labour leader,0 -
“Country before party” was the Brexit line to take. Just one syllable too many.egg said:The Boris Farage Pact a hugely significant moment in this campaign. It will either help Brexit Party and Conservatives or backfire. Inside a bubble where you can’t see the difference anyway between Boris Tories and Brexit Party under Farage, this makes little difference other than idea it wont split the Brexit vote. So very good news.
On the other hand outside that bubble where Farage is very right of centre and his love for No Deal Brexit extreme, how many BP votes hinged on not being Tory, how many Tory votes hinged on not being Farage?
The guardian if you haven’t read it, can’t stop laughing at Farage for his climb down.
“If this was supposed to be a rally, you’d have to call it Triumph of the Willy. Here was a guy who’d spent 10 days bullishly making Johnson an offer he couldn’t refuse, (not forgetting a 10 point demolition of Boris deal, a deal that hasn’t changed a jot) it seems the PM does not negotiate with Faragists. The Brexit party leader is one of those hapless movie villains who tells a millionaire he’s kidnapped his wife, and the millionaire goes – great, you can keep her.”
I’m not so sure the Guardian has got this right, their position takes people on their word about what happened. Nigel said he got his assurances from a video in a Boris tweet, but with Tice and Farage both offered peerages there’s clearly been backroom discussions going on, so I agree with the BP members who feel there’s been a backroom meeting and stitch up.0 -
Could well be. I think such was inevitable really. But potentially making a lot more Tory seats relatively safe could be major in fairness.MaxPB said:
I think it motivates remainers to vote tactically even where there is no formal alliance.nunu2 said:
Today's news changes things a lot more then people think.Mysticrose said:
ComRes 7% gap. I still don't believe Labour will poll in the 20's.Mysticrose said:
If they get to within 5% of the tories then this is all to play for.0 -
Why would the Brexit Party contest Kensington?Big_G_NorthWales said:The next important moment is when the candidate lists are revealed and which labour seats have TBP fighting the election
Do not be surprised if some or more marginals do not have any TBP representation
I expect Arron Banks and Farage are in further talks over this0