politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Remainers of the Day. Why are pollsters consistently findi
Comments
-
Also on a pragmatic basis, would they think negotiating subsequent deals with a bunch of Brexitloons drunk on victory would have any utility whatsoever? Defeat them utterly and start again with what's left.DougSeal said:
“Clearly blink” is doing a lot of work there. I see no evidence for it. Giving way on a matter of such fundamental importance would be a huge loss for them. It’s a huge point of pride.Philip_Thompson said:
I agree. With a strong UK thanks to Boris winning a handsome majority, the EU will clearly blink and remove the backstop and we can agree a deal.noneoftheabove said:
He may well. I think regardless it remains very unlikely we no deal regardless which is my main concern.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed. Thanks guys.noneoftheabove said:
Because going into October he has no majority, no EU negotiators to deal with.Philip_Thompson said:
It doesn't matter who chose the deadline. He opposed extending in March and voted against it then, why would he support extending in October?noneoftheabove said:He boxed himself into a ridiculous position in the Tory leadership contest by fully committing to meet the deadline imposed by the French President. After that he had no good options.
I am pleased he has found a way to avoid no deal. Tories should be absolutely livid he has wrecked his party and been hugely disloyal to avoid the embarrassment of saying actually we need more time though.
By January he hopes to have a decent majority, and new EU representatives to deal with who are not tied to the existing plans.
January is clearly a better date for him negotiating than October.
And I expect him to have a very handsome majority indeed thanks to the idiots "opposing" him running away from an election.0 -
I agree. The only Ref2 with a solid claim to legitimacy would be a trinary Hard/Soft/Remain and some sort of pref voting to ID the winner.Nigel_Foremain said:I think Brexit is a massive stupidity, but I really don't think revoke is anything like sensible from where we are now. One way out would be to offer a referendum that clarifies the original result with Hard Brexit v EEA on the ballot paper. Hopefully the sensible compromise of EEA or similar would prevail.
Unfortunately I do not see the ballot paper having Hard on it.
And TBH I am not expecting to see any Ref at all since a Labour win (of any type) in any pre-Brexit GE is a stretch for my imaginative faculties right now.0 -
Boris is great at preaching to the choir.Philip_Thompson said:
Probably not.CarlottaVance said:
That long?Philip_Thompson said:
Tories 40% by November.Jonathan said:
Just wait until Tory Conference. Boris's speech at Conference is going to be something to remember. Tubthumping, barnstorming and election winning while the cowards opposite still haven't agreed to an election yet.
It’s the unpersuaded he needs to convince.
Given voters think by a factor of 2:1 he’s in it for himself and not the country that may be an uphill task.0 -
Yes.Philip_Thompson said:
Pride cometh before the fall.DougSeal said:
“Clearly blink” is doing a lot of work there. I see no evidence for it. Giving way on a matter of such fundamental importance would be a huge loss for them. It’s a huge point of pride.Philip_Thompson said:
I agree. With a strong UK thanks to Boris winning a handsome majority, the EU will clearly blink and remove the backstop and we can agree a deal.noneoftheabove said:
He may well. I think regardless it remains very unlikely we no deal regardless which is my main concern.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed. Thanks guys.noneoftheabove said:
Because going into October he has no majority, no EU negotiators to deal with.Philip_Thompson said:
It doesn't matter who chose the deadline. He opposed extending in March and voted against it then, why would he support extending in October?noneoftheabove said:He boxed himself into a ridiculous position in the Tory leadership contest by fully committing to meet the deadline imposed by the French President. After that he had no good options.
I am pleased he has found a way to avoid no deal. Tories should be absolutely livid he has wrecked his party and been hugely disloyal to avoid the embarrassment of saying actually we need more time though.
By January he hopes to have a decent majority, and new EU representatives to deal with who are not tied to the existing plans.
January is clearly a better date for him negotiating than October.
And I expect him to have a very handsome majority indeed thanks to the idiots "opposing" him running away from an election.0 -
Don't fancy writing the questions, TBH.kinabalu said:
I agree. The only Ref2 with a solid claim to legitimacy would be a trinary Hard/Soft/Remain and some sort of pref voting to ID the winner.Nigel_Foremain said:I think Brexit is a massive stupidity, but I really don't think revoke is anything like sensible from where we are now. One way out would be to offer a referendum that clarifies the original result with Hard Brexit v EEA on the ballot paper. Hopefully the sensible compromise of EEA or similar would prevail.
Unfortunately I do not see the ballot paper having Hard on it.
And TBH I am not expecting to see any Ref at all since a Labour win (of any type) in any pre-Brexit GE is a stretch for my imaginative faculties right now.0 -
I’m sure Boris will put Leo right on Monday:
https://twitter.com/TomMcTague/status/1169927858074083329?s=200 -
Maybe in your echo chamber. Boris was widely predicted to lead the Conservative Party (or what is left of it) to destruction. It will be his only "achievement", and he is making ground on this prediction. The man is a liability and a disgrace to his family party and country. The UK's first joke PM. The second one, a socialist version, on his way, curtesy of the first.Philip_Thompson said:
I can't believe they're dumb enough to fall into Boris's trap.Jonathan said:
He's put out a big massive trap, got a neon flashing sign saying "Trap Here" with an arrow pointing at it and they're going straight in. Hilarious!
Tories 40% by November.0 -
Have you taken over from HYUFD for ludicrously partisan predictions?Philip_Thompson said:
Probably not.CarlottaVance said:
That long?Philip_Thompson said:
Tories 40% by November.Jonathan said:
Just wait until Tory Conference. Boris's speech at Conference is going to be something to remember. Tubthumping, barnstorming and election winning while the cowards opposite still haven't agreed to an election yet.0 -
If he doesn't extend then my guess is he quickly gets VONCed at High Speed and the remain alliance quickly agrees to make Corbyn the Prime Minister so he can extend. Needs must in that situation.Brom said:There is no reason for Boris to ask for an extension is there? It seems all very obvious that he just won't bother or will only agree to extend for 1 day.
Meanwhile he gets taken to court and faces a recall petition in Uxbridge (Corbyn, Clarke or whoever extends).
It'd be the biggest by-election ever.0 -
That's an unusual meaning of "agree" you have there:kinabalu said:
I agree. The only Ref2 with a solid claim to legitimacy would be a trinary Hard/Soft/Remain and some sort of pref voting to ID the winner.Nigel_Foremain said:I think Brexit is a massive stupidity, but I really don't think revoke is anything like sensible from where we are now. One way out would be to offer a referendum that clarifies the original result with Hard Brexit v EEA on the ballot paper. Hopefully the sensible compromise of EEA or similar would prevail.
Unfortunately I do not see the ballot paper having Hard on it.
And TBH I am not expecting to see any Ref at all since a Labour win (of any type) in any pre-Brexit GE is a stretch for my imaginative faculties right now.
@Nigel_Foremain: "I really don't think revoke is anything like sensible from where we are now"
@kinabalu: "I agree. The only Ref2 with a solid claim to legitimacy would be a trinary Hard/Soft/Remain and some sort of pref voting to ID the winner."0 -
-
Indeed - as Boris is discovering this week.Philip_Thompson said:
Pride cometh before the fall.DougSeal said:
“Clearly blink” is doing a lot of work there. I see no evidence for it. Giving way on a matter of such fundamental importance would be a huge loss for them. It’s a huge point of pride.Philip_Thompson said:
I agree. With a strong UK thanks to Boris winning a handsome majority, the EU will clearly blink and remove the backstop and we can agree a deal.noneoftheabove said:
He may well. I think regardless it remains very unlikely we no deal regardless which is my main concern.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed. Thanks guys.noneoftheabove said:
Because going into October he has no majority, no EU negotiators to deal with.Philip_Thompson said:
It doesn't matter who chose the deadline. He opposed extending in March and voted against it then, why would he support extending in October?noneoftheabove said:He boxed himself into a ridiculous position in the Tory leadership contest by fully committing to meet the deadline imposed by the French President. After that he had no good options.
I am pleased he has found a way to avoid no deal. Tories should be absolutely livid he has wrecked his party and been hugely disloyal to avoid the embarrassment of saying actually we need more time though.
By January he hopes to have a decent majority, and new EU representatives to deal with who are not tied to the existing plans.
January is clearly a better date for him negotiating than October.
And I expect him to have a very handsome majority indeed thanks to the idiots "opposing" him running away from an election.
There is no upside politically in Ireland to anyone’s abandoning the backstop. They take a hit economically, sure (not as much as Brexiteers think though) but they can blame the big bad Brits for that. London is disliked there as Brussels is here - it would be considered a “surrender” in the charming military argot you love.
There is nothing to be gained in Germany, France or anywhere else for throwing Ireland under a bus. So it’s no deal. Some more Tory MPs won’t change that. Just means our Parliament is as united as they are and positions are more entrenched.0 -
Poor old Gordon, what a shameOldKingCole said:
Guys, you've lost me. I've only just got my head around QTWTAIYNigel_Foremain said:
yay, I used POBWAS the other shame. I know it was popular on PB as POGWAS back in Gordon's day. I think maybe we should change to POBWAT.Jonathan said:
Poor old Boris, what a t**t0 -
0
-
0
-
POGWAS was Poor Old Gordon What a Shame. POBWAT is Poor Old Boris What a T___OldKingCole said:
Guys, you've lost me. I've only just got my head around QTWTAIYNigel_Foremain said:
yay, I used POBWAS the other shame. I know it was popular on PB as POGWAS back in Gordon's day. I think maybe we should change to POBWAT.Jonathan said:0 -
No, me neither. Nothing quite works. And it's such a massive thing to do to ask people to vote again, i.e. to set aside June 2016. All of which is why, although I can see the route to it, I simply cannot envisage it happening. For me, Ref2 is a Not Happening event. One of those things that I will believe if and when it occurs and not before.OldKingCole said:Don't fancy writing the questions, TBH.
0 -
-
Somewhat amusing that one of the acts of a PM 2 before Boris (Dave) namely the FTPA is the thing which is scuppering Boris now.0
-
Well, apart from it being the law that he has to ask (and for three months). Though aren't the anti No-Dealers taking a risk that he can't persuade one European leader to veto? (Or that one of them will choose to veto of their own accord). I suppose they would then move to an VONC and an emergency Revoke PM?Brom said:There is no reason for Boris to ask for an extension is there? It seems all very obvious that he just won't bother or will only agree to extend for 1 day.
0 -
So useless she enforced the legal requirement for the HoC to agree on any WA. Not that useless really! Poor old Brexiteers, no real understanding of how our system of legal checks and balances work!Brom said:Poor old Gina Miller, completely useless and out of her depth!
1 -
The FTPA has done a sterling job of separating the legislature from the executive. Separation of powers fans must love it.eek said:No October election
https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/11699237326279598090 -
-
It doesn't go far enough, but it is a start.DougSeal said:
The FTPA has done a sterling job of separating the legislature from the executive. Separation of powers fans must love it.eek said:No October election
https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/11699237326279598090 -
This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.Scott_P said:0 -
Obliged!Tabman said:
Poor old Gordon, what a shameOldKingCole said:
Guys, you've lost me. I've only just got my head around QTWTAIYNigel_Foremain said:
yay, I used POBWAS the other shame. I know it was popular on PB as POGWAS back in Gordon's day. I think maybe we should change to POBWAT.Jonathan said:
Poor old Boris, what a t**t
Obvious when you think about it.0 -
No deal is dead. Brexit is on life-support.0
-
-
Smart move.Scott_P said:
Boris Johnson stood for the Tory party leadership in a bid "to get Brexit done." He doesn't want an election, the public don't want an election and now it's clear the opposition doesn't want an election.
Let's see how this piece of sh*t proceeds. Has the retarded moron Cummings war-gamed this? Watching the lying disingenuous fat slob stew in his own mess will be deliciously fun!!!-1 -
I agree with you - and this was more or less Labour's original position - but the current polarized political climate makes such an offering impossible for them now.kamski said:But the point is a referendum which Remain wins by a small margin is unlikely to settle the issue, or is it? And if the Soft Brexit option wins, then why not go straight there without another divisive referendum which half the country anyway won't see as legitimate?
I think the soft brexit option offers a bit more to hardcore remainers than hardcore leavers:
We still wouldn't have full control of immigration
We'd still be paying money in to Brussels
We wouldn't be free to make whatever trade deals we liked with third parties
We generally wouldn't have repatriated as much sovereignty as possible.
Against that, I think the UK does have a responsibility for the situation in Northern Ireland, and a very soft Brexit solves that problem.
A very soft Brexit also offers the consolation to the hardcore remainers that it would be fairly easy to rejoin at some point in the future. And the consolation to hardcore leavers that it would be possible to leave the single market and/or customs union at some point in the future (when a solution has been found for Northern Ireland). Although I suspect that most people will just want to get on with their lives and never reopen the issue again.
They would get slaughtered both sides - Tories 'Proper' Leave, LDs Remain.
Hence the pivot to Ref2.0 -
Cummings must have gamed it that an extension would be deadly for Boris. No Deal followed by an election wouldn't be ideal, but an prolonged Brexit must be avoided at any cots, even if Boris is criminally charged.Scott_P said:0 -
What the resident PB Brexiteers don’t seem to understand is that getting rid of the Backstop is seen in Dublin and Ireland more generally as a “surrender” to London. That phrase has much more resonance historically there than our bleating about “surrender” to Brussels. We’ve never been militarily occupied by Brussels. London has been sending troops to Ireland for the best part of a millenniumCarlottaVance said:I’m sure Boris will put Leo right on Monday:
https://twitter.com/TomMcTague/status/1169927858074083329?s=200 -
The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.DougSeal said:
Indeed - as Boris is discovering this week.Philip_Thompson said:
Pride cometh before the fall.DougSeal said:
“Clearly blink” is doing a lot of work there. I see no evidence for it. Giving way on a matter of such fundamental importance would be a huge loss for them. It’s a huge point of pride.Philip_Thompson said:
I agree. With a strong UK thanks to Boris winning a handsome majority, the EU will clearly blink and remove the backstop and we can agree a deal.noneoftheabove said:
He may well. I think regardless it remains very unlikely we no deal regardless which is my main concern.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed. Thanks guys.noneoftheabove said:
Because going into October he has no majority, no EU negotiators to deal with.Philip_Thompson said:
It doesn't matter who chose the deadline. He opposed extending in March and voted against it then, why would he support extending in October?noneoftheabove said:He boxed himself into a ridiculous position in the Tory leadership contest by fully committing to meet the deadline imposed by the French President. After that he had no good options.
I am pleased he has found a way to avoid no deal. Tories should be absolutely livid he has wrecked his party and been hugely disloyal to avoid the embarrassment of saying actually we need more time though.
By January he hopes to have a decent majority, and new EU representatives to deal with who are not tied to the existing plans.
January is clearly a better date for him negotiating than October.
And I expect him to have a very handsome majority indeed thanks to the idiots "opposing" him running away from an election.
There is no upside politically in Ireland to anyone’s abandoning the backstop. They take a hit economically, sure (not as much as Brexiteers think though) but they can blame the big bad Brits for that. London is disliked there as Brussels is here - it would be considered a “surrender” in the charming military argot you love.
There is nothing to be gained in Germany, France or anywhere else for throwing Ireland under a bus. So it’s no deal. Some more Tory MPs won’t change that. Just means our Parliament is as united as they are and positions are more entrenched.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?0 -
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
0 -
Johnson should resign Oct 18 and recommend Ken Clarke as his successor.KentRising said:
This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.Scott_P said:0 -
I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.0 -
-
Then again, it might not. It will work with those 32% or so who think no-deal self harm is a good idea, but I doubt it will wash much with the rest. Dog whistle stuff for the CINO Party core voteByronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.0 -
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?0 -
You’re totally misreading it, perhaps because you’ve forgotten the Surrender Act. If Boris does not seek an Extension, the EU will unilaterally give us one, of a length they will chooseStark_Dawning said:
Cummings must have gamed it that an extension would be deadly for Boris. No Deal followed by an election wouldn't be ideal, but an prolonged Brexit must be avoided at any cots, even if Boris is criminally charged.Scott_P said:0 -
This kind of language is quite unnecessary and not in tune with the long-established ethos of the site. You are not the only offender, so (to a point) I apologise for singling this post out.murali_s said:Let's see how this piece of sh*t proceeds. Has the retarded moron Cummings war-gamed this? Watching the lying disingenuous fat slob stew in his own mess will be deliciously fun!!!
1 -
Cool. Lets jump straight to 7 then. His choice.CarlottaVance said:I’m sure Boris will put Leo right on Monday:
https://twitter.com/TomMcTague/status/1169927858074083329?s=201 -
But due to the FTPA, how does he ever call an election?! The opposition parties could wait until 2022....Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.0 -
Boris has a couple of moves up his sleeve - though fast running out of options.
1 In mid October bring back TMs deal as, in the circumstances the best available
and/or
2 A couple of days before he is due to go to ask for the extension he has been forced into by the new act, go to the Palace, resign, and advise HM the Queen to ask Corbyn, as LOTO to form a government.
0 -
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?0 -
A minor hit for them; a major hit for us. A political win for them (SM integrity maintained, example made of UK).Philip_Thompson said:
The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.DougSeal said:
Indeed - as Boris is discovering this week.Philip_Thompson said:
Pride cometh before the fall.DougSeal said:
“Clearly blink” is doing a lot of work there. I see no evidence for it. Giving way on a matter of such fundamental importance would be a huge loss for them. It’s a huge point of pride.Philip_Thompson said:
I agree. With a strong UK thanks to Boris winning a handsome majority, the EU will clearly blink and remove the backstop and we can agree a deal.noneoftheabove said:
He may well. I think regardless it remains very unlikely we no deal regardless which is my main concern.Philip_Thompson said:
Indeed. Thanks guys.noneoftheabove said:
Because going into October he has no majority, no EU negotiators to deal with.Philip_Thompson said:
It doesn't matter who chose the deadline. He opposed extending in March and voted against it then, why would he support extending in October?noneoftheabove said:He boxed himself into a ridiculous position in the Tory leadership contest by fully committing to meet the deadline imposed by the French President. After that he had no good options.
I am pleased he has found a way to avoid no deal. Tories should be absolutely livid he has wrecked his party and been hugely disloyal to avoid the embarrassment of saying actually we need more time though.
By January he hopes to have a decent majority, and new EU representatives to deal with who are not tied to the existing plans.
January is clearly a better date for him negotiating than October.
And I expect him to have a very handsome majority indeed thanks to the idiots "opposing" him running away from an election.
There is no upside politically in Ireland to anyone’s abandoning the backstop. They take a hit economically, sure (not as much as Brexiteers think though) but they can blame the big bad Brits for that. London is disliked there as Brussels is here - it would be considered a “surrender” in the charming military argot you love.
There is nothing to be gained in Germany, France or anywhere else for throwing Ireland under a bus. So it’s no deal. Some more Tory MPs won’t change that. Just means our Parliament is as united as they are and positions are more entrenched.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?
That's why threat of no deal is empty. And always has been.0 -
The Act obliges the prime minister to seek an extension, it doesn't permit the EU to impose an extension if the PM doesn't ask for one.Byronic said:
You’re totally misreading it, perhaps because you’ve forgotten the Surrender Act. If Boris does not seek an Extension, the EU will unilaterally give us one, of a length they will chooseStark_Dawning said:
Cummings must have gamed it that an extension would be deadly for Boris. No Deal followed by an election wouldn't be ideal, but an prolonged Brexit must be avoided at any cots, even if Boris is criminally charged.Scott_P said:
0 -
Boris can still 'get Brexit done'. He'll just have to have a bit less of the 'Come on chaps, fix bayonets and over the top' mentality they presumably taught him in the Eton CCF. After all charging machine guns with fixed bayonets was eventually realised to be a Bad Idea.murali_s said:
Smart move.Scott_P said:
Boris Johnson stood for the Tory party leadership in a bid "to get Brexit done." He doesn't want an election, the public don't want an election and now it's clear the opposite doesn't want an election.
Let's see how this piece of sh*t proceeds. Has the retarded moron Cummings war-gamed this? Watching the lying disingenuous fat slob stew in his own mess will be deliciously fun!!!0 -
Sounds about right. The objective has to be: Brexit on Oct 31. Worry about the aftermath later.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.0 -
Minor for Ireland?Tabman said:
A minor hit for them; a major hit for us. A political win for them (SM integrity maintained, example made of UK).Philip_Thompson said:The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?
That's why threat of no deal is empty. And always has been.
Cool then what's the big deal, take the hit and move on.0 -
Yes it does. However parliament has the power to reject the offered extension. Clearly parliament won’t reject, as the alternative will be no deal.Chris said:
The Act obliges the prime minister to seek an extension, it doesn't permit the EU to impose an extension if the PM doesn't ask for one.Byronic said:
You’re totally misreading it, perhaps because you’ve forgotten the Surrender Act. If Boris does not seek an Extension, the EU will unilaterally give us one, of a length they will chooseStark_Dawning said:
Cummings must have gamed it that an extension would be deadly for Boris. No Deal followed by an election wouldn't be ideal, but an prolonged Brexit must be avoided at any cots, even if Boris is criminally charged.Scott_P said:0 -
Fiona whatever her name was thought she could disregard the law, and look what happened to her!Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?
0 -
-
Agreed. It would be the smart thing for Boris to do. I hope he warns Labour on Monday that is his plan. Surely they cannot ignore an election and just sit back and allow no deal to happen?Stark_Dawning said:
Sounds about right. The objective has to be: Brexit on Oct 31. Worry about the aftermath later.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.0 -
Well, what do you think it means when it says "says he would not seek Brexit delay even if it becomes law"?Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?0 -
He meant 'Revoke' as in without Ref2 was not sensible.Tissue_Price said:That's an unusual meaning of "agree" you have there:
@Nigel_Foremain: "I really don't think revoke is anything like sensible from where we are now"
@kinabalu: "I agree. The only Ref2 with a solid claim to legitimacy would be a trinary Hard/Soft/Remain and some sort of pref voting to ID the winner."
Didn't you, Nigel?0 -
So what does Boris do now? FTPA GE won't pass. Probably a one liner single bill won't pass.
He could raise a VoC in his own government, and dare the opposition to 'support' him (or abstain). Is that it? I don't see any other way now.
0 -
He’s bluffing. Also, note how he says HE won’t seek an extension, that’s permissible by law. But the same law says, in that scenario, the EU should offer an extension of its own choosing, which the commons - not Boris - can reject or notChris said:
Well, what do you think it means when it says "says he would not seek Brexit delay even if it becomes law"?Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?0 -
The question comes down to will the public be grateful that parliament engineered a way to block no-deal and also blocked an election they don't want, or will they see it as parliament blocking Brexit / GE and in doing some being anti-democratic.Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.1 -
He literally called for a referendum between Hard Brexit and EEA.kinabalu said:
He meant 'Revoke' as in without Ref2 was not sensible.Tissue_Price said:That's an unusual meaning of "agree" you have there:
@Nigel_Foremain: "I really don't think revoke is anything like sensible from where we are now"
@kinabalu: "I agree. The only Ref2 with a solid claim to legitimacy would be a trinary Hard/Soft/Remain and some sort of pref voting to ID the winner."
Didn't you, Nigel?0 -
You mean he will agree to it but he won't seek it?Chris said:
Well, what do you think it means when it says "says he would not seek Brexit delay even if it becomes law"?Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?0 -
"Boris will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31"TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.
Can the lying disingenuous fat slob actually do this? What are the mechanisms here?0 -
Mr. Thompson. When are you guys that support Brexit going to understand? The EU knows we have a lot more to lose than they. They will lose to some extent, but they will mitigate, and they do not think it is worth compromising the single market, and they are right.
Besides, Boris is telling everyone here there is nothing to fear from no-deal. Therefore by extension there is less to fear for the EU. It is therefore a very limited bargaining chip. Unless he is lying to us, which I am sure Boris wouldn't do now would he?0 -
Maybe I am missing something, but I am struggling to see how BoZo going to the country saying "I was forced to make Corbyn PM, so elect me again so I can deal with Brussels" is a winning strategy0
-
He should deny Royal Assent to the bill.0
-
0
-
We have more to lose by agreeing to the backstop than they do to removing the backstop.Nigel_Foremain said:Mr. Thompson. When are you guys that support Brexit going to understand? The EU knows we have a lot more to lose than they. They will lose to some extent, but they will mitigate, and they do not think it is worth compromising the single market, and they are right.
Besides, Boris is telling everyone here there is nothing to fear from no-deal. Therefore by extension there is less to fear for the EU. It is therefore a very limited bargaining chip. Unless he is lying to us, which I am sure Boris wouldn't do now would he?0 -
The point is it's not going to change the agreed WA.Philip_Thompson said:
Minor for Ireland?Tabman said:
A minor hit for them; a major hit for us. A political win for them (SM integrity maintained, example made of UK).Philip_Thompson said:The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?
That's why threat of no deal is empty. And always has been.
Cool then what's the big deal, take the hit and move on.
The economic hit to Ireland will be bailed out by the other 26 (and the US)0 -
Of course he can do it and it's glaringly obvious, plus he will get plenty of public support for doing so. Labour will have to backtrack on not voting for an election or take Boris to the courts.murali_s said:
"Boris will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31"TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.
Can the lying disingenuous fat slob actually do this? What are the mechanisms here?0 -
No, no more warnings. One of the reasons Cummings and No.10 have fucked up is their intentions end up getting widely reported in the media, tipping off the enemy at every turn. If they intend to go down the - what would be absolutely nuclear - route of faking attempts to seek an extension, then Brexiting hard on 31st October, they need to keep absolutely schtum.Brom said:
Agreed. It would be the smart thing for Boris to do. I hope he warns Labour on Monday that is his plan. Surely they cannot ignore an election and just sit back and allow no deal to happen?Stark_Dawning said:
Sounds about right. The objective has to be: Brexit on Oct 31. Worry about the aftermath later.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.
Doesn't sit well with me. One, they would be breaking the law. Two, there could be civil strife (even if only of the quiche-eating variety). Three, Brexiting in such a way would legitimise further calls to Remain (or re-join). Brexit would be a running sore indefinitely.0 -
I can live with that.Tabman said:
The point is it's not going to change the agreed WA.Philip_Thompson said:
Minor for Ireland?Tabman said:
A minor hit for them; a major hit for us. A political win for them (SM integrity maintained, example made of UK).Philip_Thompson said:The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?
That's why threat of no deal is empty. And always has been.
Cool then what's the big deal, take the hit and move on.
The economic hit to Ireland will be bailed out by the other 26 (and the US)0 -
He is a "something will come up" man. It is why he is such a poor leader. He does not plan, he leaves that to Cummings, and therefore when Cummy gets it slightly wrong he gets blown all over the place.Byronic said:
He’s bluffing.Chris said:
Well, what do you think it means when it says "says he would not seek Brexit delay even if it becomes law"?Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?0 -
When you wrote "Of course he won't," you meant "Of course he will"?Byronic said:
He’s bluffing. Also, note how he says HE won’t seek an extension, that’s permissible by law. But the same law says, in that scenario, the EU should offer an extension of its own choosing, which the commons - not Boris - can reject or notChris said:
Well, what do you think it means when it says "says he would not seek Brexit delay even if it becomes law"?Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?
Good God.0 -
Boris will refuse to go to Brussels to ask for an extension and challenge the Commons to impeach him according to Peston and as a last resort resign, let Corbyn take over to go to Brussels to extend so Labour have their mitts all over denying the Leave vote most Labour seats voted for while the LDs put Corbyn in power (even if purely to extend) then wait for the inevitable general election once the LDs VONC Corbyn as soon as he has extendedTheValiant said:So what does Boris do now? FTPA GE won't pass. Probably a one liner single bill won't pass.
He could raise a VoC in his own government, and dare the opposition to 'support' him (or abstain). Is that it? I don't see any other way now.1 -
Yes. The ensuing election will turn on that.FrancisUrquhart said:
The question comes down to will the public be grateful that parliament engineered a way to block no-deal and also blocked an election they don't want, or will they see it as parliament blocking Brexit / GE and in doing some being anti-democratic.Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.0 -
Wow, you managed all of that without a breath. You forgot to mention "will-of-the-people" and other such moronic platitudes.HYUFD said:
Boris will refuse to go to Brussels to ask for an extension and challenge the Commons to impeach him according to Peston and as a last resort resign, let Corbyn take over to extend so Labour have their mitts all over denying the Leave vote most Labour seats voted for while the LDs out Corbyn in power (even if purely to extend) then wait for the inevitable general election once the LDs VONC Corbyn as soon as he has extendedTheValiant said:So what does Boris do now? FTPA GE won't pass. Probably a one liner single bill won't pass.
He could raise a VoC in his own government, and dare the opposition to 'support' him (or abstain). Is that it? I don't see any other way now.0 -
I agree that they possibly won't tip off Labour. It just depends what Boris prefers - a no deal Brexit to his name and approval from the majority of his base, or a winnable October election. Both come with huge risk but will clearly be better options for the Tories than asking for a 3 month extension which would be incredibly damaging.KentRising said:
No, no more warnings. One of the reasons Cummings and No.10 have fucked up is their intentions end up getting widely reported in the media, tipping off the enemy at every turn. If they intend to go down the - what would be absolutely nuclear - route of faking attempts to seek an extension, then Brexiting hard on 31st October, they need to keep absolutey schtum.Brom said:
Agreed. It would be the smart thing for Boris to do. I hope he warns Labour on Monday that is his plan. Surely they cannot ignore an election and just sit back and allow no deal to happen?Stark_Dawning said:
Sounds about right. The objective has to be: Brexit on Oct 31. Worry about the aftermath later.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.0 -
The nuclear option is for Boris to resign and force Corbyn to sign up to an extension. Corbyn will lose a vote of no confidence a few days later, and there'll be an election. Boris will have kept his promise not to sign.1
-
Boris's line would be that the evil Remainer Establishment coup has installed Corbyn so the people must vote for Boris. In other words, Boris would run an insurgent campaign, like that billionaire property developer man of the people in America.Scott_P said:Maybe I am missing something, but I am struggling to see how BoZo going to the country saying "I was forced to make Corbyn PM, so elect me again so I can deal with Brussels" is a winning strategy
0 -
Nov now heavy odds on. 2020 coming in too. Oct a 7/1 shot.0
-
GreatPhilip_Thompson said:
I can live with that.Tabman said:
The point is it's not going to change the agreed WA.Philip_Thompson said:
Minor for Ireland?Tabman said:
A minor hit for them; a major hit for us. A political win for them (SM integrity maintained, example made of UK).Philip_Thompson said:The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?
That's why threat of no deal is empty. And always has been.
Cool then what's the big deal, take the hit and move on.
The economic hit to Ireland will be bailed out by the other 26 (and the US)
So the terms of the debate become No Deal = huge economic damage to ourselves; vs remain and avoid it
There is no mythical alternative deal.
Remain vs No Deal
Bring it on.
It's a win win for Remain. Albeit the latter win is pyhrric, but it destroys the Tories too.0 -
He won’t ask for an extension. He will either resign or let the EU impose an extension. As per the Surrender ActChris said:
When you wrote "Of course he won't," you meant "Of course he will"?Byronic said:
He’s bluffing. Also, note how he says HE won’t seek an extension, that’s permissible by law. But the same law says, in that scenario, the EU should offer an extension of its own choosing, which the commons - not Boris - can reject or notChris said:
Well, what do you think it means when it says "says he would not seek Brexit delay even if it becomes law"?Byronic said:
He can’t do that. It’s now the law. And it specifically provides for this eventuality.Chris said:
?Byronic said:
Of course he won’t. It would be electoral seppuku. He will abide by the Surrender Act, and wait for the EU to impose a new extension, then he will turn to voters and say, Look, see what they’ve made us do, see how they’ve handed even more power to Brussels.Scott_P said:
And it might work.
He's saying he won't abide by the Anti-No Deal Act, isn't he?
Good God.
The fascinating Q is what happens if the EU says, OK, fuck this, your extension is five years. Deal with it once and for all.
Eek.0 -
BoZo is due to spend the night at Balmoral
Maybe HMQ should have a word in his shell-like, if he carries on saying he will deliberately break the law.0 -
You need to read the text. Parliament doesn't have the power to reject the extension if it's for the requested date. And if it's for another date, parliament only gets to decide if the PM wants to delegate the decision to them.Byronic said:
Yes it does. However parliament has the power to reject the offered extension. Clearly parliament won’t reject, as the alternative will be no deal.Chris said:
The Act obliges the prime minister to seek an extension, it doesn't permit the EU to impose an extension if the PM doesn't ask for one.Byronic said:
You’re totally misreading it, perhaps because you’ve forgotten the Surrender Act. If Boris does not seek an Extension, the EU will unilaterally give us one, of a length they will chooseStark_Dawning said:
Cummings must have gamed it that an extension would be deadly for Boris. No Deal followed by an election wouldn't be ideal, but an prolonged Brexit must be avoided at any cots, even if Boris is criminally charged.Scott_P said:0 -
Similarly if we agree to keep the backstop and pass the WA we avoid an economic hit. However we lose face. If they remove the backstop they lose face. Sauce for the goose etc.Philip_Thompson said:
The gain from agreeing a deal is they avoid the economic hit.
Is an economic hit worth paying to avoid embarrassment?
And it's more than embarrasment for them. They sincerely think removing the backstop risks a return to the violenct past. You and your cohorts sincerely think the backstop is a democratic outrage. I (personally) think both claims are overstated but that hardly matters, they are both sincerely and passionately held. Neither want to "surrender" - much as I hate the use of such militaristic language. If you consider th EU to be the enemy you need to understand their motivations and, with respect, you don't seem to. And the support for the backstop in Ireland and the EU is to my mind stronger than opposition here.0 -
It will be dragged out in the Courts while the EU gives us an indefinite extension then?Brom said:
Of course he can do it and it's glaringly obvious, plus he will get plenty of public support for doing so. Labour will have to backtrack on not voting for an election or take Boris to the courts.murali_s said:
"Boris will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31"TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.
Can the lying disingenuous fat slob actually do this? What are the mechanisms here?0 -
Might back the fragrant Soubry though.MarqueeMark said:
I can't see Clarke standing again.AndyJS said:
I think Grieve and Clarke could win their seats as independents if the LDs don't stand.dyedwoolie said:
Can't see many of those indies winning, grieve for example has a very tough ask to win Beaconsfieldeek said:
And now the Tories can't back down resulting in 12 seats probably being needlessly lost.dyedwoolie said:
Cummings is a tool. Framing the opposition as blocking Brexit is broadly a winning approach I think but its execution has been abject. What really did for him was the size of the rebellion. I guess he thought they might be suspending the whip from a handful, not 21, but that was down to how things were done. The sequencing was all askew.Mysticrose said:
I do wish people would stop elevating this politically autistic advisor. He was good on one single issue campaign that didn't involve dealing with MPs or, indeed, anyone who had a voice in or around his team.Stark_Dawning said:anothernick said:
I think the govt has already agreed the bill will receive the RA by Monday.Stark_Dawning said:
Depends whether Boris can kill off the Rebel Bill by not allowing HM to give assent etc. His best option now is Leave 31 October with No Deal and election later. Nothing else seems possible or good.anothernick said:
I think you mean a post-extension general election? After Johnson's "do or die" pledge to leave by 31 October has been binned.Stark_Dawning said:
Proroguing doesn’t look too smart now - just allows Jezza to sit back and count the days until a post-No Deal general election. Tic toc.Scott_P said:
In that case Cummings must have another trick up his sleeve to prevent an extension. Quite what remains to be seen and be amazed at.
Cummings is politically inept and has created a total disaster.
We had all this nonsense hero worship with Nick Timothy.
My brother is in S Hammonds constituency, reckons he is much safer standing against the Tories than under their banner.0 -
I agree with you, which is why I've been asking about this all morning after mulling it for a few days.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm calling it now.
If no election is agreed on Monday, Boris Johnson will continue to prorogue Parliament past October 31, so they cannot kick Boris out whilst Boris fails to agree an extension and we leave with no deal on the 31st of October.
Well that's the plan, I think we're going to see some epic constitutional shenanigans.
It's Johnson's last, desperate, act once the No Deal bill becomes law.
And, make no mistake, it really IS desperate. Whether he would succeed, god knows. Probably not, because end of the day the law is the law but still ...
Ergo, the safest route for the Opposition rebel alliance is to table a Vote of No Confidence after the No Deal Bill has passed. For belt and braces they then ought to vote on someone who DOES have the confidence of the House, whom the Queen can then call to become PM.
Doesn't have to be for very long. Just to see through Article 50 extension and to call an Election for November. Job done.
Anything else, i.e. leaving Johnson to continue stewing in his own juices is very dangerous, especially if Parliament isn't sitting. Remember, Johnson was commanding the media agenda until Parliament began to re-assemble. Prorogue Parliament and he can pretend to be on the side of Vox populi.0 -
It doesn't look great for Boris, but is there anything that looks better?DecrepitJohnL said:
Boris's line would be that the evil Remainer Establishment coup has installed Corbyn so the people must vote for Boris. In other words, Boris would run an insurgent campaign, like that billionaire property developer man of the people in America.Scott_P said:Maybe I am missing something, but I am struggling to see how BoZo going to the country saying "I was forced to make Corbyn PM, so elect me again so I can deal with Brussels" is a winning strategy
0 -
That’s small print. My point is good.Chris said:
You need to read the text. Parliament doesn't have the power to reject the extension if it's for the requested date. And if it's for another date, parliament only gets to decide if the PM wants to delegate the decision to them.Byronic said:
Yes it does. However parliament has the power to reject the offered extension. Clearly parliament won’t reject, as the alternative will be no deal.Chris said:
The Act obliges the prime minister to seek an extension, it doesn't permit the EU to impose an extension if the PM doesn't ask for one.Byronic said:
You’re totally misreading it, perhaps because you’ve forgotten the Surrender Act. If Boris does not seek an Extension, the EU will unilaterally give us one, of a length they will chooseStark_Dawning said:
Cummings must have gamed it that an extension would be deadly for Boris. No Deal followed by an election wouldn't be ideal, but an prolonged Brexit must be avoided at any cots, even if Boris is criminally charged.Scott_P said:0 -
Possibly correct, but the nature of the EU is that they will not do that without the consent of the Taoiseach. The EU is not like Boris Johnson, it won't just say, "Oh we don't agree with you so we will sack you from the Party/club". They are a consensus driven organisation, rather than the autocratic cartel of Brexiteer fantasy.Philip_Thompson said:
We have more to lose by agreeing to the backstop than they do to removing the backstop.Nigel_Foremain said:Mr. Thompson. When are you guys that support Brexit going to understand? The EU knows we have a lot more to lose than they. They will lose to some extent, but they will mitigate, and they do not think it is worth compromising the single market, and they are right.
Besides, Boris is telling everyone here there is nothing to fear from no-deal. Therefore by extension there is less to fear for the EU. It is therefore a very limited bargaining chip. Unless he is lying to us, which I am sure Boris wouldn't do now would he?0 -
I have just returned from town having met a colleague from years ago and she has always been non political. Not this morning, she is furious with the mps for attempting to stop brexit and wants them gone
Later in Asda I overheard a group discussing brexit and they too were very angry and the target of that anger was Corbyn
Now we have a rebel alliance refusing the legitimate request to put it to the people until they think no deal is off the table, which of course it is not if Boris wins a GE on the basis of deal or no deal
Also does Gina Millar and John Major think they are winning the ordinary voters over with their elite attitude and pots of money attempts through the High and Supreme Courts decision on proroguing parliament. Most people have no idea about the detail but just see a group of the privileged colluding with the EU to stop brexit
Boris is a fool, but I am beginning to think the public are looking elswhere at the fools resisting brexit by any means possible
5 -
Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)KentRising said:
This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.Scott_P said:0 -
It would be clear grounds for him to be dismissed as prime minister.Scott_P said:BoZo is due to spend the night at Balmoral
Maybe HMQ should have a word in his shell-like, if he carries on saying he will deliberately break the law.
In effect he would be daring the Queen to dismiss him. An appalling position to put her in, but what does he care about that in comparison with his own career?0 -
Whoever is advising Corbyn right now is doing a much better job than whoever (we know who) is advising Johnson.
Had Johnson somehow sprung the election request out of the blue with little time to consult, Corbyn would probably have gone along with it (as with TMay in May 17) But as it was so heavily trailed, smarter voices could warn Corbyn off and persuade him of the virtues of patience, boxing Johnson in. Corbyn's played a blinder this week as he's listened to smarter advice.
Johnson could perhaps ask Labour if they have any decent advisors going spare?0 -
I think you could be right.Big_G_NorthWales said:I have just returned from town having met a colleague from years ago and she has always been non political. Not this morning, she is furious with the mps for attempting to stop brexit and wants them gone
Later in Asda I overheard a group discussing brexit and they too were very angry and the target of that anger was Corbyn
Now we have a rebel alliance refusuing the legitimate request to put it to the people until they think no deal is off the table, which of course it is not if Boris wins a GE on the basis of deal or no deal
Also does Gina Millar and John Major think they are winning the ordinary voters over with their elite attititude and pots of money attempts through the High and Supteme Courts decision on proroguing parliament. Most people have no idea about the detail but just see a group of the priviliged colluding with the EU to stop brexit
Boris is a fool but I am beginning to think the public are looking elswhere a the fools resisting brexit by any means possible0 -
I think Labour Brexit policy is nearly coherent but it needs a tweak. Which is to be neutral on the outcome of the referendum. The policy then becomes:
In 2016 half the country voted to Remain; half the country to Leave. Three years later we're stuck and it's still half and half. A Labour government will therefore present the best Leave option along with the Remain option and let the people make the final decision. The Labour government will then happily implement the choice made in that vote, allowing us to move onto our main policies of a fairer society etc. The best Leave option, as presented, will be the one that causes the least economic disruption while meeting our obligations to Northern Ireland, which is part of the UK.
Five sentences instead of a soundbite. But when the soundbites are "Surrender bill" and "Die in the ditch", sensible people might be more comfortable with the Labour approach.
0
