Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Remainers of the Day. Why are pollsters consistently findi

145679

Comments

  • Pulpstar said:

    A mind from Merseyside ;) who has won far more than me betting on politics reckons it has to be Corbyn btw...

    The first recommendation is Boris's, and there is plenty of evidence that Corbyn could not command the House (statements from Swinson and Independents). Of course that might change.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    edited September 2019


    So whilst we should never forget our role in a hideous trade (and one that we were not alone in doing), we can also take some pride that we eventually fought against it.

    There's a bit of a question mark about this "we" business. Nobody alive then is around now. The nature of our state is very different, both in composition and constitution. Very many of the descendants of the British then live in other countries and very many of the population today are descendants of people who were not British then.
    The continuity linking us to them, linking today's Britain to the Britain of then is faded to the extent that it only exists as a story. It's like pouring a cup of tea into a river and trying to follow where it goes. You can for a while, but in the end it's both everywhere and nowhere.

    I feel no shame at the Atlantic slave trade, nor any pride in Britain's efforts to curtail it. Nor should any of you, really.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    DougSeal said:

    "You started that fire, but here's a medal for putting it out"

    I understand where you're coming from, but I think you're wrong to so blithely disregard the point.
    You cannot make up for a great wrong like that, but action to do what you can is worth more than words even if the scales are never balanced.
  • Scott_P said:

    https://twitter.com/RobDotHutton/status/1169944667061915649

    Has anyone got a graphic for falling over a cliff?

    That is quite poweful as it is simple to understand

    It is also utter garbage.

    If you think exiting the EU under this rabble will be simple, I have several bridges to sell you.
    Of course it is garbage. That is not the point, simple messages cut through and that is why the next GE will be

    Conservatives - leave
    Lib Dems - remain

    Labour - we haven't a clue but we will get a deal, put it to the people, and then campaign against our own deal so we remain
  • Scott_P said:
    How’s he going to tweak it when he hasn’t made any proposals?
    The ERG are in the same bind as Boris - they have made such vociferous statements about "The Deal" that they have no way back.

    Also, recall that Boris has a very minority govt at the moment. May had +10 and could not get it through. Boris has -44.
  • HYUFD said:

    Our very own Nick Palmer with Jeremy Hunt this morning

    https://twitter.com/Jeremy_Hunt/status/1169902266230304770?s=20

    Presume this is the very same Nick Palmer ex-MP, of PB? Great tweet/photo.

    November is inexplicably now odds-on.

    Alastair explains this better than i can but if Parliament is prorogued until 14th October and then needs to re-convene and vote through an early GE that takes a minimum of 5 weeks then it has a very narrow window to successfully land at the end of November.

    It’s really a bet on proroguation being cancelled or curtailed. VoNC shenanigans or even a new bill to terminate the session notwithstanding the FTPA wouldn’t make it any faster.

    The only day in November it could realistically be is 28th. EU Summit is on 17th/18th October, earliest Parliament would be dissolved is week beginning 21st, and 25 working days takes us to week beginning 25th. Could theoretically not be a Thursday, but why bother when the immediate deadline is gone?

    Yes, I'd bet against November. Particularly given he might try to tart up May's deal a bit at the summit, and have a last ditch attempt to make 31st, "do or die".
    Fair points very well made by Casino and Sir Norfolk.

    Regarding December, are we really going to have an election in the thick dark, possibly rain, sleet and snow of winter?? Somehow, I can't see it. There are only two possible dates in any case – 4 and 11 Dec – on 18 Dec the schools break up and many people will be travelling/away.

    So perhaps Casino's 2020 play is the right one?
    If there’s no GE this year then it’ll be my second biggest political bet winner - ever.

    You can currently lay GE2019 at 1.16 on Betfair, which seems as obvious as lays get.
  • rawzerrawzer Posts: 189
    Pulpstar said:

    rawzer said:

    only 'useless' in the context that the Prime Minister is prepared to break the law with intent. Which I suppose in normal times is not something you tend to consider likely.

    Well the opposition has repeatedly said it doesn't trust Johnson. Surely if you don't trust him you'll try and remove him at the first opportunity ?
    I guess so... well actually at the first opportunity that you can do so without risking him finding a way to do the thing you least want him to do
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    Scott_P said:
    How’s he going to tweak it when he hasn’t made any proposals?
    Get fellow leaders to change a few meaningless words or give some sort of waffly "best endeavours" statement as a fig-leaf.

    Fuel Cummings up with cheap plonk and set him loose on Geoffrey Cox until he decides that his advice is that Johnson's fig-leaf changes everything.

    Barring that, change the font.
    An interesting what if scenario had Cox either had a different legal opinion last time or been willing to ignore his legal view under political pressure.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    DougSeal said:


    "You started that fire, but here's a medal for putting it out"

    Understates the asymmetry. You mugged, raped, robbed and murdered several old ladies, but then gave 50p to a Big Issue seller on the way home.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,573
    Byronic said:

    algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I have just returned from town having met a colleague from years ago and she has always been non political. Not this morning, she is furious with the mps for attempting to stop brexit and wants them gone

    Later in Asda I overheard a group discussing brexit and they too were very angry and the target of that anger was Corbyn

    Now we have a rebel alliance refusing the legitimate request to put it to the people until they think no deal is off the table, which of course it is not if Boris wins a GE on the basis of deal or no deal

    Also does Gina Millar and John Major think they are winning the ordinary voters over with their elite attitude and pots of money attempts through the High and Supreme Courts decision on proroguing parliament. Most people have no idea about the detail but just see a group of the privileged colluding with the EU to stop brexit

    Boris is a fool, but I am beginning to think the public are looking elswhere at the fools resisting brexit by any means possible

    Parliament/Westminster is playing a very, very dangerous game and I'm unsure what is is they think they are going to achieve - if they think the electorate will blame Boris for their game playing they are deluded (but then Remainers never have understood Leavers and have never made any attempt to do so - that's been half the problem)

    Richard Tice on QT was very clear where the blame would lie if we don't leave on 31st October and it wasn't with Boris who I noted he was very supportative of.

    Sooner or later cowardly Corbyn will have to stop cowering from behind the sofa and actually face the voters and when he does I suspect the voters verdict will be merciless.
    This is correct. Ordinary law abiding citizens are starting to use language about our parliamentary system and MPs which should cause parliamentarians to sit up and think.

    The echoes of the Civil War are, once again, profound. If you’d asked parliamentarians in the 1630s whether they’d end up beheading the king, they would have called you mad. Back then, Oliver Cromwell was an obscure yokel.

    But what started with arcane disputes about money ended up with the overthrow of the entire system, and with Cromwell as Lord Protector.
    However little can be said for Cromwell 'Yokel' is not the right term for graduates of Sidney Sussex and sons of gentlemen.

    Fair dos. But he was ‘obscure’
    An obscure MP by the 1620s.

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    murali_s said:

    TOPPING said:

    Scott_P said:
    Seems a bit more chaff to get rid of before we reach purity.
    I wonder what purity is?
    I'm sure there are a couple of posters on here who will tell us.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,217
    kle4 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Thats what MV3 was attempting to do. It didnt work. Some labour mps are promising that this time theyd back it but thats not enough. Some of the expelled Tories backed it but might not again.

    I think it's too big a risk for Boris. Theoretically since he promised brexit do or die that must include being willing to try the WA again, if tweaked. But theres no guarantee it passes and then hes ripped to shreds by Farage and the Spartans. And even if he gets it through BXP surge to some extent, then labour agree to take him down and hes out of office.
    The WA can only come back post election if Johnson gets a big enough majority to surpass the Spartans...

    No chance he can back it before.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
  • isam said:

    Scott_P said:

    Yes it would indeed. A majority Tory government could resolve this quite simply.

    BoZo had one.

    He torched it.
    No he didnt!
    When he became PM, he had a working majority of 1

    He fired a lot MPs

    He now has a "majority" of -44

    Spin it any way you like....
    Two wasn't it? Brecon was vacant.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Scott_P said:
    How’s he going to tweak it when he hasn’t made any proposals?
    The ERG are in the same bind as Boris - they have made such vociferous statements about "The Deal" that they have no way back.

    Also, recall that Boris has a very minority govt at the moment. May had +10 and could not get it through. Boris has -44.
    There is no Brexit until after a GE - May never had a Brexit or a deal majority. Neither did or does Boris.
  • Can a British government move a motion of no confidence in itself?

    If so I suspect that might be what gets tabled on Monday. Play the 14 day game. Might get Corbyn in Number 10 for a brief period but he would be the one extending. If not, Boris gets his election.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    21%. Will of the people.
  • kle4 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Sigh. Everyone is still wasting time. I guess humiliating BoJo is it's own reward, but blimey this is a shambles.
    It was always destined to be one. The only question was when...
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    algarkirk said:

    I have just returned from town having met a colleague from years ago and she has always been non political. Not this morning, she is furious with the mps for attempting to stop brexit and wants them gone

    Later in Asda I overheard a group discussing brexit and they too were very angry and the target of that anger was Corbyn

    Now we have a rebel alliance refusing the legitimate request to put it to the people until they think no deal is off the table, which of course it is not if Boris wins a GE on the basis of deal or no deal

    Also does Gina Millar and John Major think they are winning the ordinary voters over with their elite attitude and pots of money attempts through the High and Supreme Courts decision on proroguing parliament. Most people have no idea about the detail but just see a group of the privileged colluding with the EU to stop brexit

    Boris is a fool, but I am beginning to think the public are looking elswhere at the fools resisting brexit by any means possible

    I don't think Boris is a fool. I think Boris could be heading for the biggest landslide victory since 1931.

    Telling the British public they voted the wrong way 3 years ago is one thing, telling them they voted the wrong way then and you don't trust them to vote again now is . . . incredible!
    That’s not the plan, at least not for the opposition parties. It’s to fuck the Conservatives.

    If the Brexit vote splits between TBXP and the Tories then it does no good whatsoever in a GE.
    Boris has done everything he needs to neuter BXP.

    In March May wanted an extension, she voted for an extension on a free vote prior to Europe agreeing to it. Extension was her choice. As a result Brexiteers abandoned her.

    Boris isn't doing that. Even if there's an extension its going to be clear who is to blame. I have lifelong Labour voters on Facebook outraged at Parliament and sharing Leave.EU stuff saying BXP and Boris need to work together.

    The idea Parliament can frustrate an election, frustrate Brexit and the voters will blame Boris is too clever by half. We can see right through it. You don't even need to be politically engaged to see through it.
    Well, someone needs to tell the electorate then because the opinion polls show a spike in BXP support and fall for the Tories if Brexit is delayed again post 31st October.
    Voters don't tell until they tell John Curtice on the day

    True, but the tory government is dependent on not getting a backlash from BXP. So do we think the polling is not going to be borne out? Some are very confident of that, I'm not, what about you?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Am I misreading that or are you misrepresenting it? So that's a 21% no deal vs 50% remain-y type situation/softer brexit?
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Yet that option would likely win if we had a series of votes, eliminating the most-hated at each round. First to go would be No Deal, then Revoke. Etc.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,573
    edited September 2019
    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

  • Scott_P said:

    https://twitter.com/RobDotHutton/status/1169944667061915649

    Has anyone got a graphic for falling over a cliff?

    That is quite poweful as it is simple to understand

    It is also utter garbage.

    If you think exiting the EU under this rabble will be simple, I have several bridges to sell you.
    Of course it is garbage. That is not the point, simple messages cut through and that is why the next GE will be

    Conservatives - leave
    Lib Dems - remain

    Labour - we haven't a clue but we will get a deal, put it to the people, and then campaign against our own deal so we remain

    If your primary aim is to vote to stop No Deal, then Labour's speific policy makes little difference. And a lot of people will vote to stop No Deal.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Ishmael_Z said:

    Just heard a quote on 5 Live news headline one of the 'rebel alliance' (didn't hear who, female) saying they have a chance to "bring down Boris and bring down Brexit".

    The mask slips. We can all see and hear what is going on. This next election is a referendum by proxy - if you want Brexit vote Boris's Conservatives. If you don't vote Lib Dem/Labour/SNP/Plaid/Greens/Independents.

    Why "the mask slips" - was anyone pretending different?

    Dom and Dommer are clearly gearing up to re-fight the referendum, hence the lets give £1bn a month which goes to Brussels, to the police, and the risible police-themed speech of yesterday.
    Some are still pretending it's not about stopping Brexit entirely. The labour position is dependent on brexit being a possible goal.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    TM and the EU agreed a deal. The fact that wasn't the end of the matter is possibly the biggest mistake in British political history.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Am I misreading that or are you misrepresenting it? So that's a 21% no deal vs 50% remain-y type situation/softer brexit?
    No only 29% for Remain or EUref2
  • Pulpstar said:

    kle4 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Thats what MV3 was attempting to do. It didnt work. Some labour mps are promising that this time theyd back it but thats not enough. Some of the expelled Tories backed it but might not again.

    I think it's too big a risk for Boris. Theoretically since he promised brexit do or die that must include being willing to try the WA again, if tweaked. But theres no guarantee it passes and then hes ripped to shreds by Farage and the Spartans. And even if he gets it through BXP surge to some extent, then labour agree to take him down and hes out of office.
    The WA can only come back post election if Johnson gets a big enough majority to surpass the Spartans...

    No chance he can back it before.
    Assuming he really wants a deal.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlainlection with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support therly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

    If the “best” lunch available is a shit sandwich then you skip it altogether.

    A deal rejected 3 times.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,217
    edited September 2019
    rawzer said:

    Pulpstar said:

    rawzer said:

    only 'useless' in the context that the Prime Minister is prepared to break the law with intent. Which I suppose in normal times is not something you tend to consider likely.

    Well the opposition has repeatedly said it doesn't trust Johnson. Surely if you don't trust him you'll try and remove him at the first opportunity ?
    I guess so... well actually at the first opportunity that you can do so without risking him finding a way to do the thing you least want him to do
    Not about a lack of trust in Boris, all about electoral advantage. T'was ever thus.
  • isam said:

    Scott_P said:

    Yes it would indeed. A majority Tory government could resolve this quite simply.

    BoZo had one.

    He torched it.
    No he didnt!
    When he became PM, he had a working majority of 1

    He fired a lot MPs

    He now has a "majority" of -44

    Spin it any way you like....
    Two wasn't it? Brecon was vacant.
    Maybe. It was a few dozen more than he has now...
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to ers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he is idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Yet that option would likely win if we had a series of votes, eliminating the most-hated at each round. First to go would be No Deal, then Revoke. Etc.
    In a decade after we have reduced EU migration EEA might be OK but at the moment it would only win as the least hated option not as the most popular and even that is arguable as 52% back Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop with Survation
  • Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.

    We are past that now, sadly. I think we need to experience No Deal before any semblence of sanity can return. The electorate needs to be confronted with reality.

  • GIN1138 said:

    Byronic said:

    Jonathan said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified. MPs are spineless narcissists. We all know they want to Remain. But they are too scared to admit it. Well then, grow some fucking hairy bollocks and Revoke, if that’s what you want. Or call a new referendum. Just stop this wretched, self-serving pantomime of ‘delay’.

    We. Need. Polls.
    The truth is that politics has polarised further this week. Each side of this conflict (it is no longer a debate) can point to real problems with the other position.

    There is no clear right or wrong, good or bad here any more. We need to accept that.

    Agreed. The nation is endangered. Enough, now.
    While our politicians are refusing to allow the 2016 referendum to be implemented and refusing to allow an election that could resolve the impasse nothing will change.

    In fact it will get even worse from here.
    Precious few politicians care now.

    Both sides are being utterly ruthless in pursuing absolute victory, and then responding with ruthlessness in kind.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    isam said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    TM and the EU agreed a deal. The fact that wasn't the end of the matter is possibly the biggest mistake in British political history.
    Or perhaps in Northern Irish political history?
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    isam said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the word "traitor". I have many friends and family who are remain sympathetic and have served their country in the armed forces. What the fuck has this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    TM and the EU agreed a deal. The fact that wasn't the end of the matter is possibly the biggest mistake in British political history.
    I think entering the First World War and killing a million of our best young men was a slightly graver mistake than rejecting Theresa May’s Brexit deal.

  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to ers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he is idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Yet that option would likely win if we had a series of votes, eliminating the most-hated at each round. First to go would be No Deal, then Revoke. Etc.
    as 52% back Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop with Survation
    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Byronic said:

    Byronic said:

    GIN1138 said:

    I have just returned from town having met a colleague from years ago and she has always been non political. Not this morning, she is furious with the mps for attempting to stop brexit and wants them gone

    Later in Asda I overheard a group discussing brexit and they too were very angry and the target of that anger was Corbyn

    Now we have a rebel alliance refusing the legitimate request to put it to the people until they think no deal is off the table, which of course it is not if Boris wins a GE on the basis of deal or no deal

    Also does Gina Millar and John Major think they are winning the ordinary voters over with their elite attitude and pots of money attempts through the High and Supreme Courts decision on proroguing parliament. Most people have no idea about the detail but just see a group of the privileged colluding with the EU to stop brexit

    Boris is a fool, but I am beginning to think the public are looking elswhere at the fools resisting brexit by any means possible

    Richard Tice on QT was very clear where the blame would lie if we don't leave on 31st October and it wasn't with Boris who I noted he was very supportative of.

    Sooner or later cowardly Corbyn will have to stop iless.
    This is s which should cause parliamentarians to sit up and think.

    The echoes of the Civil War are, once again, profound. If you’d asked parliamentarians in the 1630s whether they’d end up beheading the king, they would have called you mad. Back then, Oliver Cromwell was an obscure yokel.

    But what started with arcane disputes about money ended up with the overthrow of the entire system, and with Cromwell as Lord Protector.
    Not sure they'd have been that amazed tbh. Less than a hundred years previously they'd had a king who'd beheaded two of his queens and executed advisors, nobles & prelates, a usurper queen beheaded, a queen who beheaded the grandmother of their current king, a serious attempt at regicide & the destruction of parliament and a steady flow of burnings and disembowellings of sundry individuals for praying a bit differently to whatever was the current mode.

    Good times.
    True enough. But I’ve read a lot of Civil War history. No one but the crazies envisaged killing the King, not when the agitations in parliament began. But then things became more polarised...
    That's true, nor did they envisage a republic. You kind of have to take the crazy options once you take certain actions.
  • Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    If MPs would support that why did they reject it in the indicative votes?
  • nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Corbyn remains PM for the election period...during which he could do an awful lot,
  • algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the wo know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

    The Tories cannot back that now either. It would destroy them. They have to deliver No Deal. They have no other option.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,517
    HYUFD said:

    I have just returned from town having met a colleague from years ago and she has always been non political. Not this morning, she is furious with the mps for attempting to stop brexit and wants them gone

    Later in Asda I overheard a group discussing brexit and they too were very angry and the target of that anger was Corbyn

    Now we have a rebel alliance refusing the legitimate request to put it to the people until they think no deal is off the table, which of course it is not if Boris wins a GE on the basis of deal or no deal

    Also does Gina Millar and John Major think they are winning the ordinary voters over with their elite attitude and pots of money attempts through the High and Supreme Courts decision on proroguing parliament. Most people have no idea about the detail but just see a group of the privileged colluding with the EU to stop brexit

    Boris is a fool, but I am beginning to think the public are looking elswhere at the fools resisting brexit by any means possible

    I don't think Boris is a fool. I think Boris could be heading for the biggest landslide victory since 1931.

    Telling the British public they voted the wrong way 3 years ago is one thing, telling them they voted the wrong way then and you don't trust them to vote again now is . . . incredible!
    That’s not the plan, at least not for the opposition parties. It’s to fuck the Conservatives.

    If the Brexit vote splits between TBXP and the Tories then it does no good whatsoever in a GE.
    Boris has done everything he needs to neuter BXP.

    In March May wanted an extension, she voted for an extension on a free vote prior to Europe agreeing to it. Extension was her choice. As a result Brexiteers abandoned her.

    Boris isn't doing that. Even if there's an extension its going to be clear who is to blame. I have lifelong Labour voters on Facebook outraged at Parliament and sharing Leave.EU stuff saying BXP and Boris need to work together.

    The idea Parliament can frustrate an election, frustrate Brexit and the voters will blame Boris is too clever by half. We can see right through it. You don't even need to be politically engaged to see through it.
    Well, someone needs to tell the electorate then because the opinion polls show a spike in BXP support and fall for the Tories if Brexit is delayed again post 31st October.
    Though even then ICM still has Labour only tied with the Tories on 28% each and the Brexit Party on 18%.

    Alliance victory on those numbers.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had this idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Am I misreading that or are you misrepresenting it? So that's a 21% no deal vs 50% remain-y type situation/softer brexit?
    No only 29% for Remain or EUref2
    But a majority for no no deal according to your figures.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    If MPs would support that why did they reject it in the indicative votes?
    Because the government was whipped for god sake.
  • Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
  • Ishmael_Z said:

    DougSeal said:


    "You started that fire, but here's a medal for putting it out"

    Understates the asymmetry. You mugged, raped, robbed and murdered several old ladies, but then gave 50p to a Big Issue seller on the way home.
    But that misses the economic hit ... it should be more like: then sold the house and car and gave all the money to the local hospice. And economic hits brings us back to Brexit.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    Pulpstar said:

    kle4 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Thats what MV3 was attempting to do. It didnt work. Some labour mps are promising that this time theyd back it but thats not enough. Some of the expelled Tories backed it but might not again.

    I think it's too big a risk for Boris. Theoretically since he promised brexit do or die that must include being willing to try the WA again, if tweaked. But theres no guarantee it passes and then hes ripped to shreds by Farage and the Spartans. And even if he gets it through BXP surge to some extent, then labour agree to take him down and hes out of office.
    The WA can only come back post election if Johnson gets a big enough majority to surpass the Spartans...

    No chance he can back it before.
    And he doesnt get a majority if BXP think theres any chance he will bring it back in any form. Snookered.
  • Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    If MPs would support that why did they reject it in the indicative votes?

    The government did not support EEA/EFTA, as far as I remember.

  • FenmanFenman Posts: 1,047

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to ers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? ow.
    Calm down. HYUFD can be strident, but he and Big G might well be right. We could be looking at a seismic shift in public opinion, as anger at parliament grows.

    That anger is justified.
    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he is idiot done for his country I would like to know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    Yougov yesterday had 21% with No Deal as first choice, 19% for Boris' renegotiated Withdrawal Agreement and 19% for Revoke and Remain but only 12% for Single Market and Customs Union

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/09/05/what-do-public-think-can-still-realistically-happe
    Yet that option would likely win if we had a series of votes, eliminating the most-hated at each round. First to go would be No Deal, then Revoke. Etc.
    as 52% back Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop with Survation
    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.
    Haven't we had enough of stupid questions giving stupid answers?
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    edited September 2019
    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Everything would work up tp 2/3 majority for a general election.

    Once in power he'd take root there... Certainly through the Winter and possibly beyond.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    If MPs would support that why did they reject it in the indicative votes?
    Idiocy. I'm still stunned nothing hot supported. Yes yes, payroll vote, but I think even the architects of the indicative votes were surprised.
  • TOPPING said:

    murali_s said:

    TOPPING said:

    Scott_P said:
    Seems a bit more chaff to get rid of before we reach purity.
    I wonder what purity is?
    I'm sure there are a couple of posters on here who will tell us.
    If enough go, there might be difficulty for the Tories to get candidates to stand.

    This could be HYUFD's big chance. Dunny-on-the-Wold might need a pure Tory....

    Step forward HY ;)
  • Conservative and Labour leaders are still yet to work out that brokering a Deal on Brexit is in both their interests in order for normal business to resume.

    Instead, they seem happy to exhaust each other in a fight to the death over it, whilst insurgents nibble ever harder at their flanks.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    Scott_P said:
    Yet being associated with Farage risks further tainting the Tories (although the damage from this diminishes as Bozo taints them himself), as Martin briefly recognises in his article. It’s a double edged sword that risks driving away what Remain support the Conservatives still have.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Corbyn remains PM for the election period...during which he could do an awful lot,
    Convention dictates not taking major decisions in those circumstances. Most parliamentarians would abide by that, and I'm convinced Corbyn is one of them.

    I can think of someone else who probably wouldn't.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited September 2019
    Moderators: I didn't write the "tough ask" post that was posted earlier by someone using my name. I never use that phrase. Someone must be trying to impersonate me. (Not sure why they'd want to).
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    TGOHF said:



    If the “best” lunch available is a shit sandwich then you skip it altogether.

    A deal rejected 3 times.

    I got almost indignant on your behalf when someone conflated you with hyufd yesterday, but this point is borderline hyufd. Realistically: you are starving hungry, you have turned down three offers of a stale spam and branston pickle bap in the hope of something better. Something better turns out to be a shit sandwich. Spam baps suddenly look a great deal more attractive than they did.
  • Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they undoubtedly are having refused to respect the winning Leave vote despite voting to have the referendum and invoke Article 50 and most of the country feels the same

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.

    We are past that now, sadly. I think we need to experience No Deal before any semblence of sanity can return. The electorate needs to be confronted with reality.

    Are the electorate really the problem here?
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468

    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    Gambling with the country’s future is shameful.
  • isam said:

    Scott_P said:

    Yes it would indeed. A majority Tory government could resolve this quite simply.

    BoZo had one.

    He torched it.
    No he didnt!
    When he became PM, he had a working majority of 1

    He fired a lot MPs

    He now has a "majority" of -44

    Spin it any way you like....
    He didn't have a working majority of 1 as those MPs wouldn't back him.

    Pretending they were on his side didn't make it so.
  • HYUFD said:



    In a decade after we have reduced EU migration EEA might be OK but at the moment it would only win as the least hated option not as the most popular and even that is arguable as 52% back Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop with Survation

    And an amazing 87% back free sex, the moon on a stick, and pet unicorns for all, so let's go for that option.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578

    algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You aring to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the wo know?
    me

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

    The Tories cannot back that now either. It would destroy them. They have to deliver No Deal. They have no other option.

    It won’t be no deal. Boris would have to get a big majority and if he gets that he will have the time and power to do something else, avoiding No Deal.
  • Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    Gambling with the country’s future is shameful.
    Should have thought of that before the referendum.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    GIN1138 said:

    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Everything would work up tp 2/3 majority for a general election.

    Once in power he'd take root there... Certainly through the Winter and possibly beyond.
    VONC is easily done.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468

    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    Gambling with the country’s future is shameful.
    Should have thought of that before the referendum.
    Shameful.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,517
    slade said:
    Is Laura having a sly fag in that photo?

  • AndyJS said:

    Moderators: I didn't write the "tough ask" post that was posted earlier by someone using my name. I never use that phrase. Someone must be trying to impersonate me. (Not sure why they'd want to).

    No somebody just broke the quote order.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    My impression (who knows ofc) is that the EU is intensely relaxed about no deal.

    Especially as they have issued us with a set of non-negotiable terms entirely at their own discretion under which no deal will operate.
  • The nature of the MPs the Tories have post-election is going to be very different. They will be far more right-wing and far less willig to compromise on Brexit. There are 21 deselected MPs to replace and a number of other moderates who have annouced their retirements on top. You can pretty much take it for granted that those who replace them will be ERG/BXP, so there is no way they are going to vote for anything that looks like May's Deal.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,468
    Byronic said:

    algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You aring to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the wo know?
    me

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

    The Tories cannot back that now either. It would destroy them. They have to deliver No Deal. They have no other option.

    It won’t be no deal. Boris would have to get a big majority and if he gets that he will have the time and power to do something else, avoiding No Deal.
    You think? When his cohort of MPs will all be far right nutjobsb
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited September 2019
    Flanner said:

    AndyJS said:

    tough ask for the libs to go from 11 to 45% or so

    But the LibDems polled over three times what the (real) Tories managed in Westminster at the Euros. And that was before Fields' thuggishness at the Guildhall, and before he switched from sanity to Johnsonism.

    Those voting with the Spiv will have to explain their treachery to their voters. In Field's case, he'll also have to explain his manifestly deranged political judgement.


    This one.
  • Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    Gambling with the country’s future is shameful.
    Should have thought of that before the referendum.
    Shameful.
    Of whom?

    Any time we change anything or have an election we gamble with the countries future.
  • ab195ab195 Posts: 477
    When you look at what’s coming out of the Brexit Party I’m starting to wonder if:

    a) Farage has discovered that the other members care more about Brexit than their political careers; and

    b) Farage has no desire to fail to win a seat for the 8th (?) time.

    Because they do rather seem to be rowing in behind Boris. There’s a way to run a Brexit Party campaign which is more about damaging Labour.
  • TOPPING said:

    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    My impression (who knows ofc) is that the EU is intensely relaxed about no deal.

    Especially as they have issued us with a set of non-negotiable terms entirely at their own discretion under which no deal will operate.
    We'll see.

    MRDA.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Noo said:


    So whilst we should never forget our role in a hideous trade (and one that we were not alone in doing), we can also take some pride that we eventually fought against it.

    There's a bit of a question mark about this "we" business. Nobody alive then is around now. The nature of our state is very different, both in composition and constitution. Very many of the descendants of the British then live in other countries and very many of the population today are descendants of people who were not British then.
    The continuity linking us to them, linking today's Britain to the Britain of then is faded to the extent that it only exists as a story. It's like pouring a cup of tea into a river and trying to follow where it goes. You can for a while, but in the end it's both everywhere and nowhere.

    I feel no shame at the Atlantic slave trade, nor any pride in Britain's efforts to curtail it. Nor should any of you, really.
    I agree. However Philip Thompson was suggesting that we have a great system that stopped the Atlantic slave trade while ignoring the fact it started it as well
  • IanB2 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Yet being associated with Farage risks further tainting the Tories (although the damage from this diminishes as Bozo taints them himself), as Martin briefly recognises in his article. It’s a double edged sword that risks driving away what Remain support the Conservatives still have.
    Turning to Farage is like turning to the bottle to solve your problems.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163

    algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You are such a prat, not even funny anymore. What has happened to you? You used to make some sensible comment. Now it is all war comic references and referring to decent British citizens as "traitors" for not agreeing with your myopic view. I am beginning to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the wo know?
    I never said traitors to country, I said traitors to democracy, which they e

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is , and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal t would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

    The Tories cannot back that now either. It would destroy them. They have to deliver No Deal. They have no other option.
    Agreed. Everything is pinned on that, only absolute victories allowed as others have said. They might well end up dominating polling but unable to deliver the no deal that is swelling their numbers.

    For what it's worth I know at least 1 former remainer who would reluctantly back no deal over Corbyn, but the country as a whole?
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
    edited September 2019
    Byronic said:

    algarkirk said:

    Byronic said:

    isam said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    This means resignation. Corbyn in No.10, massively legitimised.
    Corbyn in No 10 for 10 seconds purely to extend as Neville Chamberlain 2, Tories then sweep through Labour Leave seats at the subsequent general election with Boris campaigning as Winston Churchill (while rightly telling Tory Remainers vote LD you get Corbyn)
    You aring to think you are actually a bot from Moscow.

    We. Need. Polls.
    Sorry that is not true. I think many remain voting MPs share the view that is similar to mine. We cannot revoke. Most supported the WA. Compromise is needed but not being offered by this idiot PM
    PS HYUFD completely destroyed any shred of cred he had when he started using the wo know?
    me

    The majority of voters backed parties that specifically opposed a No Deal Brexit in the 2017 General Election. They did so again in the 2019 European Elections.

    Leaving, with a deal, is the thing voters consistently have voted for, and MPs have consistently voted against

    Yep - so we need to get to a deal that most voters and MPs would accept. That involves EEA/EFTA, but is politically impossible for the Tories to support becaue it would destroy them.

    It’s insane that no party in parliament - none of them - support the outcome you suggest, which is clearly the most sensible, and likely to enjoy the widest public support, and which saves our democracy and our economy. They’ve all gone mad on all sides.
    Agree. But TMs deal is the best available right now, and leaves various doors open.

    The Tories cannot back that now either. It would destroy them. They have to deliver No Deal. They have no other option.

    It won’t be no deal. Boris would have to get a big majority and if he gets that he will have the time and power to do something else, avoiding No Deal.

    He is going to be leading a far more uncompromising set of Tory MPs than those that were elected in 2017. The ERG will have 30-40 new members at a minimum. He will essentially be leading the Brexit party post-election.

  • ab195 said:

    When you look at what’s coming out of the Brexit Party I’m starting to wonder if:

    a) Farage has discovered that the other members care more about Brexit than their political careers; and

    b) Farage has no desire to fail to win a seat for the 8th (?) time.

    Because they do rather seem to be rowing in behind Boris. There’s a way to run a Brexit Party campaign which is more about damaging Labour.

    I think Farage knows if he tries to square up against Boris he'll just look silly and it could destroy his reputation.

    The enemies of Brexit are clear. Its not Boris.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,293
    edited September 2019
    Noo said:

    GIN1138 said:

    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Everything would work up tp 2/3 majority for a general election.

    Once in power he'd take root there... Certainly through the Winter and possibly beyond.
    VONC is easily done.
    We don't go the the polls in November, December, January or February. It just won't happen.

    If Jezza is in power on 1st November he'll still be there on 1st April.

    By that time who knows how the political siuation will look...
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    Noo said:


    So whilst we should never forget our role in a hideous trade (and one that we were not alone in doing), we can also take some pride that we eventually fought against it.

    There's a bit of a question mark about this "we" business. Nobody alive then is around now. The nature of our state is very different, both in composition and constitution. Very many of the descendants of the British then live in other countries and very many of the population today are descendants of people who were not British then.
    The continuity linking us to them, linking today's Britain to the Britain of then is faded to the extent that it only exists as a story. It's like pouring a cup of tea into a river and trying to follow where it goes. You can for a while, but in the end it's both everywhere and nowhere.

    I feel no shame at the Atlantic slave trade, nor any pride in Britain's efforts to curtail it. Nor should any of you, really.
    And without wishing to drift the thread with too much history, it is quite possible to (mostly) argue the whole thing in terms of competitive economic self-interests, rather than morality, anyway.
  • IanB2 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Yet being associated with Farage risks further tainting the Tories (although the damage from this diminishes as Bozo taints them himself), as Martin briefly recognises in his article. It’s a double edged sword that risks driving away what Remain support the Conservatives still have.
    Turning to Farage is like turning to the bottle to solve your problems.
    Tories don't need to turn to Farage, they need to run a Vote Leave Mk.II campaign.

    Let Vote Leave/Tories win the election, let Leave.EU/BXP attract anyone who viscerally hates the Tories so they don't go to Labour.
  • ByronicByronic Posts: 3,578
    DougSeal said:

    Noo said:


    So whilst we should never forget our role in a hideous trade (and one that we were not alone in doing), we can also take some pride that we eventually fought against it.

    There's a bit of a question mark about this "we" business. Nobody alive then is around now. The nature of our state is very different, both in composition and constitution. Very many of the descendants of the British then live in other countries and very many of the population today are descendants of people who were not British then.
    The continuity linking us to them, linking today's Britain to the Britain of then is faded to the extent that it only exists as a story. It's like pouring a cup of tea into a river and trying to follow where it goes. You can for a while, but in the end it's both everywhere and nowhere.

    I feel no shame at the Atlantic slave trade, nor any pride in Britain's efforts to curtail it. Nor should any of you, really.
    I agree. However Philip Thompson was suggesting that we have a great system that stopped the Atlantic slave trade while ignoring the fact it started it as well
    We really didn’t start the Atlantic slave trade. The Portuguese did. Go to Lagos on the Algarve, and visit the slave market there. Which still stands. Harrowing and educational
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    TOPPING said:

    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    My impression (who knows ofc) is that the EU is intensely relaxed about no deal.

    Especially as they have issued us with a set of non-negotiable terms entirely at their own discretion under which no deal will operate.
    We'll see.

    MRDA.
    Well the proposals exist and the EU doesn't seem like the the kind of groovy, flexible, let's all hug kind of institution that would scare up another 400 page document over the next seven weeks.
  • Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,337
    edited September 2019
    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Nothing in itself, though without the support (or at least acquiescence) of virtually everyone else, he might be VONC'd before he gets to St Pancras*

    I suppose a smart bunch of smaller parties might be "a bit busy with committee work" until he got home again, delaying them getting round to a VONC. That would help Jo Swinson avoid no deal without breaking her "not supporting PM Corbyn" stance.

    *I'm assuming Jez will take the train? Apart from being greener, it's probably safer than asking the UK armed forces to fly him ("Yes sir.. if you want a coffee.. just press that button marked 'Ejector Seat'. We had it repurposed")
  • DougSeal said:

    Noo said:


    So whilst we should never forget our role in a hideous trade (and one that we were not alone in doing), we can also take some pride that we eventually fought against it.

    There's a bit of a question mark about this "we" business. Nobody alive then is around now. The nature of our state is very different, both in composition and constitution. Very many of the descendants of the British then live in other countries and very many of the population today are descendants of people who were not British then.
    The continuity linking us to them, linking today's Britain to the Britain of then is faded to the extent that it only exists as a story. It's like pouring a cup of tea into a river and trying to follow where it goes. You can for a while, but in the end it's both everywhere and nowhere.

    I feel no shame at the Atlantic slave trade, nor any pride in Britain's efforts to curtail it. Nor should any of you, really.
    I agree. However Philip Thompson was suggesting that we have a great system that stopped the Atlantic slave trade while ignoring the fact it started it as well
    We did not start the slave trade.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,163
    ab195 said:

    When you look at what’s coming out of the Brexit Party I’m starting to wonder if:

    a) Farage has discovered that the other members care more about Brexit than their political careers; and

    b) Farage has no desire to fail to win a seat for the 8th (?) time.

    Because they do rather seem to be rowing in behind Boris. There’s a way to run a Brexit Party campaign which is more about damaging Labour.

    A) would be a fascinating development. What do they do if their new party says we dont trust boris so were standing, but some candidates are really worried that might stop Brexit? How many like that can bring farage to heel?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    He is going to be leading a far more uncompromising set of Tory MPs than those that were elected in 2017. The ERG will have 30-40 new members at a minimum. He will essentially be leading the Brexit party post-election.

    Yes and all the new Cons MPs replacing the sacked ones will be hardline also. Else why bother applying to the Conservative party.
  • TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Withdrawal Agreement minus the backstop does not exist for god sake.

    Not until we give the EU the forced choice between that, or no deal and no backstop.
    My impression (who knows ofc) is that the EU is intensely relaxed about no deal.

    Especially as they have issued us with a set of non-negotiable terms entirely at their own discretion under which no deal will operate.
    We'll see.

    MRDA.
    Well the proposals exist and the EU doesn't seem like the the kind of groovy, flexible, let's all hug kind of institution that would scare up another 400 page document over the next seven weeks.
    Yes they do. They are precisely the kind of institution that will fudge anything to get across the line when they have no other choice.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    The nature of the MPs the Tories have post-election is going to be very different. They will be far more right-wing and far less willig to compromise on Brexit. There are 21 deselected MPs to replace and a number of other moderates who have annouced their retirements on top. You can pretty much take it for granted that those who replace them will be ERG/BXP, so there is no way they are going to vote for anything that looks like May's Deal.

    Virtually all Tory MPs voted for the Withdrawal Agreement with a technical solution for the Irish border rather than the backstop ie the Brady amendment so if Boris gets a Tory majority he can pass that if he agrees it with the EU.

  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    GIN1138 said:

    Noo said:

    GIN1138 said:

    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Everything would work up tp 2/3 majority for a general election.

    Once in power he'd take root there... Certainly through the Winter and possibly beyond.
    VONC is easily done.
    We don't go the the polls in November, December, January or February. It just won't happen.

    If Jezza is in power on 1st Novedmber he'll still be there on 1st April.

    By that time who knows how the political siuation will look...
    Only if he has the confidence of parliament. Which, if he does, is legitimate. If not, the LOTO (presumably the Conservative leader?) VONCs him and a new government or election follows.
    What other outcome could there possibly be?
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    GIN1138 said:

    nichomar said:

    Simple question Johnson resigns Queen invites corbyn to for government as PM no need to have support from anyone else. Goes to Brussels requests extension comes back and seeks 2/3 majority for GE. what is wrong with that

    Everything would work up tp 2/3 majority for a general election.

    Once in power he'd take root there... Certainly through the Winter and possibly beyond.
    Then VONC yes?
  • Byronic said:

    DougSeal said:

    Noo said:


    So whilst we should never forget our role in a hideous trade (and one that we were not alone in doing), we can also take some pride that we eventually fought against it.

    There's a bit of a question mark about this "we" business. Nobody alive then is around now. The nature of our state is very different, both in composition and constitution. Very many of the descendants of the British then live in other countries and very many of the population today are descendants of people who were not British then.
    The continuity linking us to them, linking today's Britain to the Britain of then is faded to the extent that it only exists as a story. It's like pouring a cup of tea into a river and trying to follow where it goes. You can for a while, but in the end it's both everywhere and nowhere.

    I feel no shame at the Atlantic slave trade, nor any pride in Britain's efforts to curtail it. Nor should any of you, really.
    I agree. However Philip Thompson was suggesting that we have a great system that stopped the Atlantic slave trade while ignoring the fact it started it as well
    We really didn’t start the Atlantic slave trade. The Portuguese did. Go to Lagos on the Algarve, and visit the slave market there. Which still stands. Harrowing and educational
    Letting facts enter the discussion. @DougSeal won't like that!
This discussion has been closed.