Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » It was exactly two years ago that Brexit, if it happens, inexo

135678

Comments

  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317

    How long before these whackos in Con membership are demanding that Calais be returned to English hands is part of a proper No Deal Brexit?

    Calais? Sod it, I want the Thirteen Colonies back... :)
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,859
    RobD said:

    Even the Irish themselves recognise NI isn't part of their country.
    Only since the Good Friday Agreement. Before then the Irish constitution claimed the whole island as their territory.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,364

    Only since the Good Friday Agreement. Before then the Irish constitution claimed the whole island as their territory.
    Yes, but it doesn't anymore, so Stuart's claims of it not being the Irish border are ridiculous.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,364
    viewcode said:

    Calais? Sod it, I want the Thirteen Colonies back... :)
    rottenborough clearly has no ambition. ;)
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317

    The Irish Border is the beach. The line you see on modern maps was unilaterally drawn by Westminster and Whitehall a century ago.
    That argument (thankfully) was settled back in the 90's

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteenth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572
    RobD said:

    Yes, but it doesn't anymore, so Stuart's claims of it not being the Irish border are ridiculous.
    Although if he's right, it would solve a whole lot of problems. We've spent ages worrying about how not to disrupt the border between Britain and Ireland but apparently there isn't one so there's no problem.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    viewcode said:

    Calais? Sod it, I want the Thirteen Colonies back... :)
    ... and we want Berwick back.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    ... and we want Berwick back.
    I demand the right for the Welsh to take the whole of England back!
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,859
    viewcode said:

    That argument (thankfully) was settled back in the 90's

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteenth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland
    Along with an agreed political process for reunification, so it was a temporary settlement.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    ydoethur said:

    Although if he's right, it would solve a whole lot of problems. We've spent ages worrying about how not to disrupt the border between Britain and Ireland but apparently there isn't one so there's no problem.
    See, I’m just trying to help.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,680
    edited June 2019

    Rents in Scotland rose at the same type rate as the rest of GB with the fees, you can see a comparison on figure 3.

    https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/bulletins/indexofprivatehousingrentalprices/2015-10-29
    Nope - sorry. From that page:

    IPHRP is released as an experimental statistic. This is a new official statistic undergoing evaluation and therefore it is recommended that caution is exercised when drawing conclusions from the published data as the index is likely to be further developed.

    Even now those caveats apply.

    The data also stops in Sept 2015, which is nearly 5 years out of date. Given that normal tenancy lengths in Scotland are 0->5 years with an "average" (undefined average) of around 2 years you would not expect to see a full impact by 2015 from 2012.

    Clearly the impact from a ban on premiums involved in setting up a tenancy will not be seen until the next time a tenancy is set up, since stuff like referencing etc is not done mid-tenancy.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,859
    ydoethur said:

    I demand the right for the Welsh to take the whole of England back!
    If the UK is dissolved, you could choose to go back to being part of England.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280

    I did both and live in a London suburb, but have no idea where to buy cocaine or even cannabis.

    Nick Palmer is probably right: it depends on your circle of friends, and class. Probably like most people, I am not much exercised by people using drugs but am appalled by the social costs in crime and violence.
    I have no idea either, but when I was at university or in my twenties in London it would have been easy to source, especially cannabis. And there must have been at least 50 occasions in my life, obviously mostly in my 20s but a few more recently when walking along the street minding my own business I have been offered drugs, mostly in holiday places in Spain or France but happens around Brixton tube or the West End too. Did this never happen to you or would you not count that as being offered drugs?
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146

    Along with an agreed political process for reunification, so it was a temporary settlement.
    British Unionists conveniently forget that little detail. They only remember what they want to remember.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317

    Out of interest what is the social background of the people who have never been offered drugs? I find it hard to believe many of them can have been at university or grown up in a city.

    I have spent more time in an university than most and I think I've never been offered them . In my limited experience, older people and people with STEM degrees just don't use them.

  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280
    MattW said:

    Nope - sorry. From that page:

    IPHRP is released as an experimental statistic. This is a new official statistic undergoing evaluation and therefore it is recommended that caution is exercised when drawing conclusions from the published data as the index is likely to be further developed.

    Even now those caveats apply.

    The data is also from early 2015, which is nearly 5 years out of date. Given that normal tenancy lengths are 0->4 years you would not expect to see a full impact by then.
    Including 2015 onwards favours England increasing faster!

    https://www.mydepositsscotland.co.uk/blog/scotland-rent-rises-lag-behind-rest-uk

    "The data shows that although UK rents have climbed by 7 per cent since records started in March 2015, rents in Scotland are up just 1.5 per cent over the same period."
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317
    RobD said:

    rottenborough clearly has no ambition. ;)
    Hah! This is only the beginning! I want Mars!
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146

    If the UK is dissolved, you could choose to go back to being part of England.
    That’s not quite what ydoethur said. I think he is demanding the right to send all those bloody Anglo-Saxons back to Denmark and Germany.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317

    Along with an agreed political process for reunification, so it was a temporary settlement.
    "Indefinite" <> "temporary"
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    If the UK is dissolved, you could choose to go back to being part of England.
    What, and be run by a load of drug-addled muppets like the current Cabinet?

    No! Let the English come into Wales, that they can be ruled by people of who are Marks of quality such as Mark James, Mark Reckless and Mark Drakeford...ah.

    That argument doesn't really work, does it?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572
    viewcode said:

    I have spent more time in an university than most and I think I've never been offered them . In my limited experience, older people and people with STEM degrees just don't use them.

    Eight and a half years and the most exciting thing I was offered was a single malt.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    JackW said:

    Not too sure .... but they have to draw the line somewhere ......
    Nobody nose where that line is....
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,531
    viewcode said:

    I have spent more time in an university than most and I think I've never been offered them . In my limited experience, older people and people with STEM degrees just don't use them.

    I suspect many of the people claiming to have taken drugs actually haven't.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146

    This adds nothing to the conversation. What a pointless comment.
    Facts are never pointless.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,364

    Facts are never pointless.
    Except it wasn't a fact.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,922
    In a funny kind of way, one has to sympathise with Roger Godsiff.

    What's a xenophobic, homophobic MP meant to do, faced with a homophobic campaign conducted by an ethnic minority group? How should he choose which prejudice to pander to? If things were arranged delicately enough, he could be like the donkey starving to death between two equidistant piles of hay:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-48569173
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    Chris said:

    Sounds good to me. Johnson calls an election based on a mythical renegotiation of May's deal. With the result that Farage campaigns for No Deal, splitting the Tory vote in two (if the Tories are lucky). Result - a Labour government, and a very soft Brexit or no Brexit at all ...
    Not a mythical renegotiation, a FTA for GB which the vast majority of Leave voters would prefer over No Deal, they are not bothered about a border in the Irish Sea and most Northern Irish voters want no hard border and quite like the backstop.


    Result - a Tory majority government for Boris with Labour perhaps even falling behind the LDs in voteshare as Corbyn still refuses to commit to EUref2
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    ydoethur said:

    What, and be run by a load of drug-addled muppets like the current Cabinet?

    No! Let the English come into Wales, that they can be ruled by people of who are Marks of quality such as Mark James, Mark Reckless and Mark Drakeford...ah.

    That argument doesn't really work, does it?
    “Drug-addled muppets.” That’s a keeper! (I do hope SeanT is lurking this evening.)
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,680
    (Reedited - sorry slightly wrong date)

    Disagree. From that page:

    IPHRP is released as an experimental statistic. This is a new official statistic undergoing evaluation and therefore it is recommended that caution is exercised when drawing conclusions from the published data as the index is likely to be further developed.

    Even now those caveats apply.

    The data also stops in Sept 2015, which is nearly 5 years out of date. Given that normal tenancy lengths in Scotland are 0->5 years with an "average" (undefined average) of around 2 years you would not expect to see a full impact by 2015 from 2012.

    Clearly the impact from a ban on premiums involved in setting up a tenancy will not be seen until the next time a tenancy is set up, since stuff like referencing etc is not done mid-tenancy.

    The other question is why Scottish Govt numbers show such a rapid increase - despite a market collapse in one major region (Aberdeenshire).
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    edited June 2019
    eek said:

    Boris only wins if Nigel doesn't stand and there is zero chance of him not standing candidates...
    Nope, Boris has a 7% lead over Labour and the LDs even with Nigel, with the Brexit Party falling back to just 13% from 20%+ now


    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1136006739864825858?s=20

  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317
    ydoethur said:

    Eight and a half years and the most exciting thing I was offered was a single malt.
    I had this discussion in work the other day. If we consider human maturation as a process of testing alternatives and discarding the ones that don't work, then the popularity of whisky dependent on age is probably indicative. If/when I retire, I can see myself getting into whisky no probs. Drugs on the other hand: zero attraction.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    RobD said:

    Except it wasn't a fact.
    You dispute that “the line you see on modern maps was unilaterally drawn by Westminster and Whitehall a century ago”? Please don’t tell me that the English education system really is as bad as reported.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    edited June 2019
    Sandpit said:

    I’ll take that as a yes then, in which case any PM is going to find an awful lot of the Conservative and Unionist party unwilling to back it.
    I don't think they will actually, provided that GB leaves the single market and customs union almost all Tories could not care less what the DUP thinks.


    Their concern was more May's plan for a temporary customs union for GB while the backstop lasted
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,680
    edited June 2019

    I suspect many of the people claiming to have taken drugs actually haven't.
    4 years at Uni in West Yorkshire 84-88. Never offered drugs.

    I just don't see any reason, any more than I see any reason for smoking.

    On smoking it was parental indoctrination. On drugs .. just ... why need it?

    Far more drugs were around working in the City in IT 10-12 years later.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    rcs1000 said:

    So, his strategy is to make the backstop less acceptable to the DUP?
    His strategy is to win a majority then ignore the DUP
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280
    MattW said:

    (Reedited - sorry slightly wrong date)

    Disagree. From that page:

    IPHRP is released as an experimental statistic. This is a new official statistic undergoing evaluation and therefore it is recommended that caution is exercised when drawing conclusions from the published data as the index is likely to be further developed.

    Even now those caveats apply.

    The data also stops in Sept 2015, which is nearly 5 years out of date. Given that normal tenancy lengths in Scotland are 0->5 years with an "average" (undefined average) of around 2 years you would not expect to see a full impact by 2015 from 2012.

    Clearly the impact from a ban on premiums involved in setting up a tenancy will not be seen until the next time a tenancy is set up, since stuff like referencing etc is not done mid-tenancy.

    The other question is why Scottish Govt numbers show such a rapid increase - despite a market collapse in one major region (Aberdeenshire).

    Read the mydeposits Scotland page

    https://www.mydepositsscotland.co.uk/blog/scotland-rent-rises-lag-behind-rest-uk

    Yes rents in Scotland have gone up, but they have gone up at least as fast in England (that does not prove it either way as there will be other factors involved, but rents rising in Scotland is miles away from proof that that is due to the ban on tenants fees).
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884
    ydoethur said:

    I'm fairly sure it's also the Irish border.
    Technically, yes. But the Irish border isn't mainly a technical border. It's a state of mind. It means completely different things to the communities it affects. For Protestant unionists the border is the necessary bulwark that creates a piece of Britain in Ireland and a safe space for them; for nationalist Catholics it's an abomination that splits families. The border is an irreconcilable and existential issue for both communities. The genius of the Good Friday Agreement wasn't to remove the border. It was to make it ambiguous. It was there if you wanted it to be and not if you didn't. Brexit removes that ambiguity. Northern Ireland either becomes an integrated part of Ireland or definitively Britain.

    Treating the border as a technical issue is doomed. The Irish government know that, as most Tory Brexiteers don't. That's why the Irish will never compromise on the backstop, I believe. They badly want the deal, but they can't compromise on the backstop to get it.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    You dispute that “the line you see on modern maps was unilaterally drawn by Westminster and Whitehall a century ago”? Please don’t tell me that the English education system really is as bad as reported.
    We are all disputing your original claim that Ireland has no border.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572
    MattW said:

    4 years at Uni in West Yorkshire 84-88. Never offered drugs.

    I just don't see any reason, any more than I see any reason for smoking.

    On smoking it was parental indoctrination. On drugs .. just ... why need it?

    Far more drugs were around working in the City in IT 10-12 years later.
    It weeded out some of the students.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280
    HYUFD said:

    Nope, Boris has a 7% lead over Labour and the LDs even with Nigel, with the Brexit Party falling back to just 13% from 20%+ now

    Is there a poll showing how Boris does when he has failed to take us out in October and looks either weak or confirmed as a liar?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,364

    You dispute that “the line you see on modern maps was unilaterally drawn by Westminster and Whitehall a century ago”? Please don’t tell me that the English education system really is as bad as reported.
    No, the claim was there isn't an Irish border.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,680
    edited June 2019

    Read the mydeposits Scotland page

    https://www.mydepositsscotland.co.uk/blog/scotland-rent-rises-lag-behind-rest-uk

    Yes rents in Scotland have gone up, but they have gone up at least as fast in England (that does not prove it either way as there will be other factors involved, but rents rising in Scotland is miles away from proof that that is due to the ban on tenants fees).
    But that is just another quote from the same experimental index which is hedged with caveats.

    I'll add btw that the English version really has created havoc, and affected all types of things that the Parliamentary Pillocks appear not to have even thought about.

    They don't even understand that when a key is lost you replace the lock not the key, 'cos it could have been pick pocketed and may even have been labelled. That's leaving aside the statutory guidance that contradics itself.

    It will take a decade of Court Actions to sort out and, as ever, the fees will come out of someone's rent.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,688
    viewcode said:

    Calais? Sod it, I want the Thirteen Colonies back... :)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sunil060902/sandbox
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,922
    HYUFD said:

    Not a mythical renegotiation, a FTA for GB which the vast majority of Leave voters would prefer over No Deal, they are not bothered about a border in the Irish Sea and most Northern Irish voters want no hard border and quite like the backstop.


    Result - a Tory majority government for Boris with Labour perhaps even falling behind the LDs in voteshare as Corbyn still refuses to commit to EUref2
    If the EU won't renegotiate - as they've said about a hundred times now - then it's mythical, regardless of whatever hypotheses you may have on the opinions of different groups of voters about it.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    rcs1000 said:

    Show me the correlation between protections for tenants and higher birthrates, and I will believe you.

    I think people care far more about housing costs and affordablity, than they do about abstract protections.

    I think you also forget just how f*cked up housing markets become when the government interferes too much.

    Landlords seeking to get rid of tenants stop doing repairs. Or they make sure that some guys making music 24/7 move into the empty apartment next door. Or start sending the boys round to encourage you to move.

    And you discourage people from renting out their properties.
    I think it's rather sad if kids grow up in insecure accommodation. And as they say it's not just a house, it's a home. The economist in you might not like that but well, that's just how it is.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,531
    FF43 said:

    Technically, yes. But the Irish border isn't mainly a technical border. It's a state of mind. It means completely different things to the communities it affects. For Protestant unionists the border is the necessary bulwark that creates a piece of Britain in Ireland and a safe space for them; for nationalist Catholics it's an abomination that splits families. The border is an irreconcilable and existential issue for both communities. The genius of the Good Friday Agreement wasn't to remove the border. It was to make it ambiguous. It was there if you wanted it to be and not if you didn't. Brexit removes that ambiguity. Northern Ireland either becomes an integrated part of Ireland or definitively Britain.

    Treating the border as a technical issue is doomed. The Irish government know that, as most Tory Brexiteers don't. That's why the Irish will never compromise on the backstop, I believe. They badly want the deal, but they can't compromise on the backstop to get it.
    Believe me the Irish border isn't ambiguous to anyone who does business on both sides of it.

    And the Irish government certainly made it less ambiguous when they changed their roads speeds from mph to kmph.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    ydoethur said:

    We are all disputing your original claim that Ireland has no border.
    I never said that. Of course there is a border between two jurisdictions in Ireland. I said that it was incorrect to refer to it as the “Irish Border”. It isn’t. The Irish border is the beach. The correct label for the artificial line is the British border in Ireland. It is entirely a unilateral creation of Westminster and Whitehall.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    edited June 2019
    nichomar said:

    How many HYUFD are there do they ever sleep, eat or s***?

    For the record I have just been to Tesco to get some food, then gone to the lavatory if anyone was concerned!
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,012
    FF43 said:

    Technically, yes. But the Irish border isn't mainly a technical border. It's a state of mind. It means completely different things to the communities it affects. For Protestant unionists the border is the necessary bulwark that creates a piece of Britain in Ireland and a safe space for them; for nationalist Catholics it's an abomination that splits families. The border is an irreconcilable and existential issue for both communities. The genius of the Good Friday Agreement wasn't to remove the border. It was to make it ambiguous. It was there if you wanted it to be and not if you didn't. Brexit removes that ambiguity. Northern Ireland either becomes an integrated part of Ireland or definitively Britain.

    Treating the border as a technical issue is doomed. The Irish government know that, as most Tory Brexiteers don't. That's why the Irish will never compromise on the backstop, I believe. They badly want the deal, but they can't compromise on the backstop to get it.
    A transcendental border.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280
    edited June 2019
    MattW said:

    But that is just another quote from the same experimental index which is hedged with caveats.
    It is the main ONS report on rental housing. Which report would you prefer to look at?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,688
    ydoethur said:

    It weeded out some of the students.
    "My policy on cake is pro having it and pro eating it."
    - Boris.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    I never said that. Of course there is a border between two jurisdictions in Ireland. I said that it was incorrect to refer to it as the “Irish Border”. It isn’t. The Irish border is the beach. The correct label for the artificial line is the British border in Ireland. It is entirely a unilateral creation of Westminster and Whitehall.
    For there to be a border, as you yourself note two jurisdictions have to be involved.

    Are you saying that Ireland has no separate jurisdiction?
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    RobD said:

    No, the claim was there isn't an Irish border.
    There is a border in Ireland, but it is most certainly not the “Irish border”.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,688

    Believe me the Irish border isn't ambiguous to anyone who does business on both sides of it.

    And the Irish government certainly made it less ambiguous when they changed their roads speeds from mph to kmph.
    And changed from the Pund to the Euro?
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    HYUFD said:

    For the record I have just been to Tesco to get some food, then gone to the lavatory if anyone was concerned!

    Don't you have your own lavatory?

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    "My policy on cake is pro having it and pro eating it."
    - Boris.
    Are we now suggesting there was a typo in 'cake'?
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,949
    Think there is a generational difference in use of drugs. As well as the class/social circle effect alluded to. It is Gen X, my cohort, who were the big users. From mid 80s to turn of the millennium, I find it hard to believe that one could have been oblivious to the ubiquity of drugs. You may not have known where to find them, but in cities at least, you didn't have to ask around much.
    Coincidentally, this is the very age of the people aspiring to run the country, and the ones now high up in the media, which is why it is being treated as "no big deal".
    Most of my old uni mates still smoke weed, quite a few of them do a lot more than that. And they all have decent jobs. Not sure that was at all as common in the generations before or since.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 12,541
    MattW said:

    4 years at Uni in West Yorkshire 84-88. Never offered drugs.

    I just don't see any reason, any more than I see any reason for smoking.

    On smoking it was parental indoctrination. On drugs .. just ... why need it?

    Far more drugs were around working in the City in IT 10-12 years later.
    Manchester Uni 73 - 76. I have never been offered drugs. Drugs I was aware of around at the time were cannabis and LSD and usually from outsiders. You could always spot them at a Uni do, trying too hard to look like students. I was only aware of one student who used cannabis who was on our floor in the hall of residence in my 1st year. He started dealing on a minor scale until his floor mates had a quiet word with him.
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    geoffw said:

    A transcendental border.
    Mocking the Irish isn’t going to get the English anywhere. Nowadays they have lots of pals (27 to be exact) and England is Johnny No Mates.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 10,022
    Didn't Boris sneeze when trying to take something or other?
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,688
    ydoethur said:

    Are we now suggesting there was a typo in 'cake'?
    Ask Boris!

    https://www.internetslang.com/CAKE-meaning-definition.asp
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884

    I never said that. Of course there is a border between two jurisdictions in Ireland. I said that it was incorrect to refer to it as the “Irish Border”. It isn’t. The Irish border is the beach. The correct label for the artificial line is the British border in Ireland. It is entirely a unilateral creation of Westminster and Whitehall.
    Which is my point too. You are taking the nationalist view of the border. But there is a different, unionist view, no less strongly held. So how do we reconcile the unreconcileable?
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,680

    It is the main ONS report on rental housing. Which report would you prefer to look at?
    In this case the one that doesn't say:

    "it is recommended that caution is exercised when drawing conclusions from the published data"

    :-)

    Especially as it also is more heavily based on existing rents which will clearly not have been impacted yet by the changes we seek to evaluate.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,688

    Didn't Boris sneeze when trying to take something or other?

    "I think I was once given cocaine but I sneezed so it didn't go up my nose. In fact, it may have been icing sugar." - Boris, 2005
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    Some good news for Rory, he ties Boris for the lead amongst those who think he would make a good PM

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1137439254806781952?s=20
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,531

    Mocking the Irish isn’t going to get the English anywhere. Nowadays they have lots of pals (27 to be exact) and England is Johnny No Mates.
    Doesn't suggest that all those tens of billions we've paid into the EU has done us much good then.

    Perhaps we're better off out of a club where we have no mates ?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113


    Don't you have your own lavatory?

    I do, I even used it
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,302
    edited June 2019
    HYUFD said:

    Nope, Boris has a 7% lead over Labour and the LDs even with Nigel, with the Brexit Party falling back to just 13% from 20%+ now


    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1136006739864825858?s=20

    Well, from an 'exciting times' point of view let's have Jeremy Hunt as Tory leader.

    If nothing else Jeremy vs Jeremy will be funny.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    HYUFD said:

    Some good news for Rory, he ties Boris for the lead amongst those who think he would make a good PM

    https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/status/1137439254806781952?s=20

    No. Rory ties Boris for who would make a mediocre prime minister, one who would score less than five out of ten.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    Chris said:

    If the EU won't renegotiate - as they've said about a hundred times now - then it's mythical, regardless of whatever hypotheses you may have on the opinions of different groups of voters about it.
    Nothing to renegotiate, Barnier has always said he would be happy with a FTA for GB as long as there was a backstop for NI. It was May who insisted on the temporary Customs Union for GB, not Barnier
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,302
    edited June 2019
    Out of interest, what prospect is there of some serious dirt being dished on one or more of the leading Tory candidates?

    Presumably Gove has tried to preempt news he expected to be released but it's hard to believe there is not more to come on some of the other candidates (ok, one of them).
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,355
    HYUFD said:

    For the record I have just been to Tesco to get some food, then gone to the lavatory if anyone was concerned!
    Correlation or causation?
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    HYUFD said:

    Nope, Boris has a 7% lead over Labour and the LDs even with Nigel, with the Brexit Party falling back to just 13% from 20%+ now


    https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1136006739864825858?s=20

    Yougov was the only pollster to underestimate Labour for the EU elections - and the data is 10 days old now.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113

    Is there a poll showing how Boris does when he has failed to take us out in October and looks either weak or confirmed as a liar?
    No, as by then he will be PM of a majority government having won a general election and shortly after taking us out of the EU on the path to a FTA for GB
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 27,531

    Well, from an 'exciting times' point of view let's have Jeremy Hunt as Tory leader.

    If nothing else Jeremy vs Jeremy will be funny.
    Hunt vs *unt ?

    :wink:
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    Doesn't suggest that all those tens of billions we've paid into the EU has done us much good then.

    Perhaps we're better off out of a club where we have no mates ?


    The EU are bullies and are abusing their existing (temporary) arrangements to try and take advantage of us. And still the remainers think they are the good guys.

    I am beginning to understand why some leavers think proroguing parliament and hard brexit are the only options.

  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340


    The EU are bullies and are abusing their existing (temporary) arrangements to try and take advantage of us. And still the remainers think they are the good guys.

    I am beginning to understand why some leavers think proroguing parliament and hard brexit are the only options.

    The Remainers are wondering what happened to “we hold all the cards”. Leavers are now snivelling about being bullied.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113

    Mocking the Irish isn’t going to get the English anywhere. Nowadays they have lots of pals (27 to be exact) and England is Johnny No Mates.
    Though not the US President it seems nor the Scots last week


    https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/donald-trump-ireland-visit-irish-border-wall-brexit-leo-varadkar-meeting/

    https://www.dw.com/en/rockall-dispute-scotland-warns-ireland-over-fishing/a-49112964
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,302
    edited June 2019

    Hunt vs *unt ?

    :wink:
    Corbyn versus Hunt will get provoke an outbreak of spoonerism.

    Edit: Actually Hunt as PM will probably bring the c-word into acceptable use.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113

    Well, from an 'exciting times' point of view let's have Jeremy Hunt as Tory leader.

    If nothing else Jeremy vs Jeremy will be funny.
    It would but the LDs would come first and have the last laugh
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,355
    FF43 said:


    Which is my point too. You are taking the nationalist view of the border. But there is a different, unionist view, no less strongly held. So how do we reconcile the unreconcileable?

    To adapt the saw about the auld Irish lad giving directions to Brexit, I wouldn't start from here.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,317

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sunil060902/sandbox
    Yes, I recall... :)
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    The Remainers are wondering what happened to “we hold all the cards”. Leavers are now snivelling about being bullied.

    Leavers weren't expecting May to flush them down the toilet.

  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,302
    HYUFD said:

    It would but the LDs would come first and have the last laugh
    Well they did have the first Jeremy :smile:
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884

    Mocking the Irish isn’t going to get the English anywhere. Nowadays they have lots of pals (27 to be exact) and England is Johnny No Mates.
    Ireland can deal with the lack of a backstop by asking to partially derogate from the Single Market, conform to UK regulation, and put their customs border into the English Channel. In times past they probably would do just that. Now they don't see why they should. The EU is more powerful than the UK.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Pulpstar said:
    They’re welcome to him.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,012

    Hunt vs *unt ?

    :wink:
    Naughtie, Naughtie
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    To adapt the saw about the auld Irish lad giving directions to Brexit, I wouldn't start from here.
    Indeed no.

    I blame James VI and I.

    It was his stupid idea to settle all those Scots into Ulster...
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,113
    justin124 said:

    Yougov was the only pollster to underestimate Labour for the EU elections - and the data is 10 days old now.
    The final YouGov for the Euro elections had Labour on 13% and the Tories on 7%.

    So while close to the final result YouGov actually underestimated the Tories more than it underestimated Labour given Labour got 14% and the Tories got 9%

    https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/05/22/european-parliament-voting-intention-brex-37-lab-1
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340


    Leavers weren't expecting May to flush them down the toilet.

    Of course. It’s never ever ever Leavers’ fault.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,280
    MattW said:

    In this case the one that doesn't say:

    "it is recommended that caution is exercised when drawing conclusions from the published data"

    :-)

    Especially as it also is more heavily based on existing rents which will clearly not have been impacted yet by the changes we seek to evaluate.
    So there is no alternative that you prefer ergo you are presenting no evidence that Scottish rents have risen faster than English ones. I have provided the opposite evidence and will leave it there as I do not have the resources to instantly create more reliable stats than the ONS are capable of.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    Of course. It’s never ever ever Leavers’ fault.

    Thank you for acknowledging that.

  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 35,302


    Leavers weren't expecting May to flush them down the toilet.

    FFS - our hand was so strong that a nonentity like May could disrupt it? If only a true Leaver like Davis, Gove, Johnson or Leadsom had been in the cabinet!
  • StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146

    Doesn't suggest that all those tens of billions we've paid into the EU has done us much good then.

    Perhaps we're better off out of a club where we have no mates ?
    It was you guys that stormed off in a huff. Not them.

    I’m sure they’ll let you stay in the club if you get grovelling a bit, but don’t expect them to stop sniggering behind your backs for a few decades.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,688
    Pulpstar said:
    The people organising/attending the Straight Pride are so deep in the closet they are having adventures in Narnia.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,688
    Was Gove off his tits on coke when he said if we voted to Leave we would hold all the cards?

    It would explain a great many things.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,572

    The people organising/attending the Straight Pride are so deep in the closet they are having adventures in Narnia.
    Are you suggesting they are lion about their sexuality?
This discussion has been closed.